The document announces a public meeting of the City Council of San Angelo, Texas to take place on March 19, 2013 at the McNease Convention Center. The agenda includes consideration of items such as approving meeting minutes, awarding bids, residential lease renewals, tax resale deeds, allocating hotel occupancy tax funds, appointing election officials, authorizing park improvements, amending zoning ordinances, and endorsing legislative actions. The meeting location is accessible to persons with disabilities and public comment will be taken.

1. NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING
AN AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS
9:00 A.M. - Tuesday, March 19, 2013
McNease Convention Center, South Meeting Room
500 Rio Concho Drive
THE MCNEASE CONVENTION CENTER IS ACCESSIBLE TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES.
ACCESSIBLE ENTRIES AND SPECIALLY MARKED PARKING SPACES ARE AVAILABLE AT BOTH
MAIN ENTRANCES AT SURBER DRIVE AND RIO CONCHO DRIVE. IF ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE
IS NEEDED TO OBSERVE OR COMMENT, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK,
ROOM 210, CITY HALL, 657-4405, AT LEAST 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING.
City Council meetings are broadcast on Channel 17-Government Access at 10:30 A.M. and 7:00 P.M. every
day for two weeks beginning on the Thursday after each meeting.
As a courtesy to those in attendance, please place your cell phone on “Silent” or “Vibrate”
Thank You!
I. OPEN SESSION (9:00 A.M.)
A. Call to Order
B. Prayer and Pledge
"Honor the Texas flag; I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, one state under God, one and indivisible.”
C. Proclamations
Nutrition Month, March 2013, to be accepted by Betty Teston, Big Country Academy of Nutrition &
Dietetics, local organization for Dietitians and members of the American Academy of Nutrition & Dietetics
(form)
Lutheran Schools Month, March 2013, to be accepted by by Ron Fritsche, Principal of Trinity Lutheran
School
D. Recognition
Rex Rogers, for winning the contest suggesting the name for the City’s government access channel SATV
E. Public Comment
The Council takes public comment on all items in the Regular Agenda. Public input on a Regular Agenda
item will be taken at its appropriate discussion. Public input on an item not on the Agenda or Consent
Agenda may be identified and requested for consideration by the Council at this time. The Council may
request an item to be placed on a future agenda, or for a Consent Agenda item, to be moved to the Regular
Agenda for public comment.
II. CONSENT AGENDA
1. Consideration of approving the February 26, 2013 City Council Special meeting minutes and the
March 5, 2013 City Council Regular meeting minutes
2. Consideration of adopting a Resolution awarding bid CFM-01-13for Pest Control Services to Bug
Express authorizing the City Manager to execute related documents (submitted by Construction &
Facilities Manager Ron Lewis)
City Council Agenda Page 1 of 5 March 19, 2013

2. 3. Consideration of approving a residential lease renewal located at Lot 104, Group Shady Point, 6678
Knickerbocker Road (Persely), and authorizing the Water Utilities Director to execute the same
(submitted by Interim Water Utilities Director Ricky Dickson)
4. Consideration of adopting a Resolution of the City of San Angelo authorizing the Mayor to execute a
tax-resale (quitclaim) deed conveying all right, title and interest of the City of San Angelo, and all other
taxing units interested in the tax foreclosure judgment:
a. 1944 & 1948 Magnolia Street, (Gonzalez), Lots 1 & 2, Block 2, Avondale, $1,000.00, Suit No.B99-0081-
T
b. 207 E Avenue L, (Perez), E 50’ x 238’ of a 1 acre Tract, Fisher Miller, $750.00, Suit No.TAX89-0388B
c. 725 Hughes Street, (Salinas), Lot 9, Block 2, Culwell, $950.00, Suit No. B-03-0087-T
d. 816 Volney, (Salinas) Portion of Lots 6-8, Block 28, Miles, 1,500.00, Suit No. B-05-0192-T
e. 111 E 13th Street, (Salinas), Lot 7, Block 57, Miles, $1,200.00, Suit No. B-97-0170-T
f. 329 13th Street, (Salinas), Lot 2, Block 2, Pecan Place, $750.00, Suit No.TAX90-0083B
g. 1916 Shelton, (Sanchez), S ½ of Lot 12, Block 3, Home Acres, $2,500.00, Suit No.B-00-0043-T
5. Consideration of adopting a Resolution allowing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate and
execute a contract with the Chamber of Commerce Convention & Visitors Bureau allocating Hotel
Occupancy Tax funds (submitted by Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Michael Dane)
6. Consideration of adopting a Resolution appointing election officials for the election to be held on May
11, 2013; and providing for an effective date (submitted by City Clerk Alicia Ramirez)
7. Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an Interlocal
Cooperation Agreement with the San Angelo Independent School District (SAISD) providing for
construction by the City of recreational and park improvements, not to exceed $175,000.00, for public
use on property owned by the SAISD generally known as Bradford Elementary School, to be
maintained by the SAISD (submitted by Parks and Recreation Director Carl White)
8. Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a first amended lease
agreement amending the original lease agreement between City of San Angelo and Howard County
Junior College District, including extending the original lease term and providing for additional
improvements to be made on leased premises (submitted by Assistant City Manager Rick Weise)
9. Consideration of adopting a Resolution endorsing certain legislative action in the Regular Session of
the 83rd Texas Legislature to enhance the competitive electric market and system reliability and to
protect the traditional role of cities in the regulatory process (submitted by City Attorney Lysia H.
Bowling)
10. Second Hearing and consideration of adopting an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A”
(Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo (submitted Interim Director of
Development Services AJ Fawver)
PD 13-01: West Company/Granger Macdonald
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES,
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS
ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE
FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: an unaddressed 9.8 acre property out of approximately 75 acres
currently described as Section 3, Arden Acres, which is located adjacent to and directly west of the
intersection of Northwest Drive and Green Hill Road. The property specifically occupies a proposed
Second Replat of Arden Acres, Section Three, Block 3, Tract 3 in western San Angelo, changing the
zoning classification from a combination of Single-Family Residential (RS-1) and General Commercial
(CH) to Planned Development (PD) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING
A PENALTY
City Council Agenda Page 2 of 5 March 19, 2013

3. 11. Second Hearing and consideration of adopting an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A”
(Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo (submitted Interim Director of
Development Services AJ Fawver)
Z 13-02: Debbie Clark
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES,
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS
ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE
FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 2008 Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of the
intersection of Beacon Street and Montague Avenue. This property specifically occupies the Avondale
Addition, Block 10, Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a
Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Two-Family Residential (RS-2) District; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
12. Second Hearing and consideration of adopting an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A”
(Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo (submitted Interim Director of
Development Services AJ Fawver)
Z 13-03: Tom Green County
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES,
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS
ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE
FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 318 North Bell Street, located on the northeast corner of the
intersection of North Bell Street and Spaulding Street. This property specifically occupies the Bell
Addition, Block 9, 2.35 acres in the southwest corner of Block 9, in north central San Angelo,
changing the zoning classification from Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to Neighborhood
Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
13. Second Hearing and consideration of adopting an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A”
(Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo (submitted Interim Director of
Development Services AJ Fawver)
Z 13-04: Abel Fernandez
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES,
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS
ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE
FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1006 East 14th Street, located approximately 170 feet from the
northeast intersection at East 14th Street and Wade Street. This property specifically occupies the Exall
Addition, Block 9, Lot 8 Exc. West 88.7’, in north central San Angelo, changing the zoning
classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
14. Second Hearing and consideration of adopting an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A”
(Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo (submitted Interim Director of
Development Services AJ Fawver)
Z 13-06: City of San Angelo Development Corporation
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES,
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS
ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE
City Council Agenda Page 3 of 5 March 19, 2013

4. FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1020, 1030, & 1040 Gateway Drive, located east of the
intersection of Gateway Drive and FM 380; more specially occupying the Gateway Addition, Section 1,
Block 3, Lots 1 and 2 and Tract A, in Section 1 being a 20.059 acres, in northeast San Angelo,
changing the zoning classification from Light Manufacturing (ML) to Heavy Manufacturing (MH)
District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
15. Second Hearing and consideration of adopting an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A”
(Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo (submitted Interim Director of
Development Services AJ Fawver)
Z 13-07: City of San Angelo Planning
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES,
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS
ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE
FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: An unaddressed tract of land located at the southwest end of
Twin Mountain Drive. This property specifically occupies approximately 24 acres of the G. Maurer
Survey 0182, Abstract 1649, west of Sections One-A and One-B of The Homestead, in southwest San
Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a Planned Development (PD) to a Single Family
Residential (RS-1) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
16. Second Hearing and consideration of adopting an Ordinance amending established boundaries of
Single Member District 1 (submitted by City Clerk Alicia Ramirez)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS
AMENDING THE ESTABLISHED BOUNDARIES OF SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT NUMBER 1
FOR THE PURPOSE OF INCORPORATING NEWLY ANNEXED AREAS INTO SAID
DISTRICT, PROVIDING FOR PRECLEARANCE AND ALL OTHER NECESSARY ACTIONS;
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE
III. REGULAR AGENDA:
F. EXECUTIVE/CLOSED SESSION
Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. Open Government; Ethics, Subtitle A.
Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings
be Open, Section 551.072 to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property
Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. Open Government; Ethics, Subtitle A.
Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings
be Open, Section 551.087 to discuss an offer of financial or other incentive to a company or companies
with whom the City of San Angelo is conducting economic development negotiations and which the City of
San Angelo seeks to have, locate, stay or expand in San Angelo
G. PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENT
17. Update on the design and construction activities for the Hickory Aquifer Water Supply Project
(Presentation by Interim Water Utilities Director Ricky Dickson and Hutch Musallam with Carollo
Engineers)
18. First public hearing and consideration of introducing an Ordinance amending the 2012-2013 Budget
for new projects, incomplete projects, capital projects and grants
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AMENDING THE BUDGET FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2012, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2013, FOR
NEW PROJECTS, INCOMPLETE PROJECTS, AND GRANTS
(Presentation by Budget Analyst Steve Mahaffey)
City Council Agenda Page 4 of 5 March 19, 2013

5. 19. Public hearing and consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the adoption of the 2013-2018
Capital Improvement Plan for the City of San Angelo
(Presentation by Budget Analyst Laura Brooks)
20. Discussion of prohibiting commercial vehicles from using certain streets and parking in certain areas
within the San Angelo city limits and any action in connection thereto
(Presentation by City Engineer Clinton Bailey)
21. Consideration of granting a request for temporary placement of a mobile home, not to exceed one year,
during construction of a permanent home on the same 3 acre site. 1105 West 48th Street, located
approximately 320 feet east of the intersection of Lake Drive and West 48 Street; more specifically
occupying the Chandler Subdivision, Section 1, Block 1, Lot 2, in northwest San Angelo
(Presentation by Interim Director of Development Services AJ Fawver)
22. First Public Hearing and consideration of introducing an Ordinance amending the allocation method of
Hotel Occupancy Tax and related matters
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO,
TEXAS, CHAPTER 5 “BUSINESS AND COMMERCE”, ARTICLE 5.800 “HOTEL OCCUPANCY
TAX”, SECTION 5.805 “PURPOSE AND DISTRIBUTION OF TAX”, BY REPEALING SAID
SECTION IN ITS ENTIRETY AND ADOPTING A NEW SECTION 5.805 ENTITLED, “USE OF
REVENUE”, TO REMOVE THE MANDATED ALLOCATION OF REVENUE FOR USES ON A
FIXED PERCENTAGE BASIS AND TO PROVIDE FOR ALLOCATION OF REVENUE FOR USES
PERMITTED BY LAW AS CITY COUNCIL MAY DETERMINE WILL PROVIDE THE BEST
VALUE IN APPLICATION OF HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX REVENUE TO THE CITIZENS OF
SAN ANGELO BY RESOLUTION FROM TIME TO TIME
(Presentation by Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Michael Dane)
23. Discussion and update on the housing data obtained by Hotel/Community Housing Committee
Members
(Requested by Councilmember Hirschfeld and presentation by City Manager Daniel Valenzuela)
H. FOLLOW UP AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES
24. Consideration of and possible action on matters discussed in Executive/Closed Session, if needed
25. Consideration of approving a Board nomination by Council and designated Councilmember:
a. Planning Commission: Valerie Priess (Mayor) to an unexpired term January 2014
26. Consideration of nominating City Council Members to serve as representatives on the Concho Valley
Council of Government General Assembly
27. Announcements and consideration of Future Agenda Items
28. Adjournment
Given by order of the City Council and posted in accordance with Title 5, Texas Government Code, Chapter
551, Tuesday, March 12, 2013, at 5:00 P.M.
/s/________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
City Council Agenda Page 5 of 5 March 19, 2013

6. City of San Angelo
Memo
Date: February 20, 2013
To: Mayor and Council Members
From: Ron Lewis, Construction and Facilities Maintenance
Subject: Agenda Item for March 19, 2013 Council Meeting
Contact: Ron Lewis, 481.2773
Caption: Consent
Adoption of a resolution awarding a contract for Pest Control Services between the
City of San Angelo and Bug Express, and authorizing the Mayor and/or City Manager
to execute said contract.
The City of San Angelo posted RFB:CFM-01-13 on the COSA website and
advertised twice in the San Angelo Standard Times Newspaper, and directly
Summary: notified 13 vendors for Pest Control Services. Ten vendors were located in San
Angelo. The bids were opened on February 1, 2013. Four vendors responded.
Bug Express provided the best value for the City of San Angelo. The initial term
of the contract is for three (3) years with two (2) options to extend for a period of
one (1) year each.
History: Construction and Facilities Maintenance and the Purchasing Department
prepared RFB: CFM-01-13 for Pest Control Services. Several calls where made
to current users of Bug Express. All had good reports to their service and one
mentioned they were on a first name basis with their service person. They work
well with scheduling and coordinating when having to gain access to large
numbers of housing unit.
Financial Impact: Total impact is $9,790.00 per year budgeted throughout several City
department accounts. Departments paying annually will receive a 5%
discount.
Related Vision Item Financial Vision: Review contracted services on annual basis to ensure highest
and best use of public funds.
(if applicable):
Other Information/ Staff recommends approval of the contract with Bug Express for Pest Control
Recommendation: Services.
Attachments: Resolution, Contract, RFB:CFM-01-13 Bid Tab
Presentation: NA
Publication: NA
Reviewed by Rick Weise, Assistant City Manager
Director:
Approved by Legal:
Adopted: 5/30/03
Revised: 6/21/10

7. CITY OF SAN ANGELO
BID TAB
CFM-01-13 PEST CONTROL SERVICE
February 1, 2013 / 2:00pm
Better Choice Bug Express Jim's Pest Control Thrash Pest Control
Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per
Facilities Frequency Frequency Per year Frequency Per year Frequency Per year Frequency Per year
1 City Hall Monthly $ 50.00 $ 600.00 $ 21.00 $ 252.00 $ 350.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00
2 Community Development Building Monthly $ 30.00 $ 360.00 $ 21.00 $ 252.00 $ 150.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00
3 Water Billing & Collection Monthly $ 30.00 $ 360.00 $ 17.00 $ 204.00 $ 125.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00
4 Santa Fe Crossing Monthly $ 30.00 $ 360.00 $ 17.00 $ 204.00 $ 225.00 $ 2,700.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00
5 Station 618 Monthly $ 30.00 $ 360.00 $ 20.00 $ 240.00 $ 155.00 $ 1,860.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00
6 Carl Ray Center Monthly $ 15.00 $ 180.00 $ 20.00 $ 240.00 $ 102.50 $ 1,230.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00
7 Southside Recreation Monthly $ 15.00 $ 180.00 $ 20.00 $ 240.00 $ 175.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00
8 Municipal Pool Monthly $ 15.00 $ 180.00 $ 20.00 $ 240.00 $ 102.50 $ 1,230.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00
9 Nature Center Monthly $ 15.00 $ 180.00 $ 20.00 $ 240.00 $ 102.50 $ 1,230.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00
10 Municipal Court Monthly $ 20.00 $ 240.00 $ 20.00 $ 240.00 $ 95.00 $ 1,140.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00
11 Wastewater Treatment Plant Quarterly $ 50.00 $ 200.00 $ 55.00 $ 220.00 $ 225.00 $ 900.00 $ 200.00 $ 800.00
12 Police Dept Monthly $ 30.00 $ 360.00 $ 30.00 $ 360.00 $ 300.00 $ 3,600.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00
13 Training Facility Monthly $ 20.00 $ 240.00 $ 45.00 $ 540.00 $ 125.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00
14 Building / 505 S. Chadbourne Monthly $ 15.00 $ 180.00 $ 15.00 $ 180.00 $ 125.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00
15 Gun Range Quarterly $ 30.00 $ 120.00 $ 50.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 800.00 $ 150.00 $ 600.00
16 McNease Convention Center Monthly $ 30.00 $ 360.00 $ 30.00 $ 360.00 $ 350.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00
17 City Auditorium Monthly $ 30.00 $ 360.00 $ 20.00 $ 240.00 $ 150.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 100.00 $ 1,200.00
18 Coliseum Monthly $ 35.00 $ 420.00 $ 40.00 $ 480.00 $ 375.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 200.00 $ 2,400.00
Every 3 weeks
(17 billing
19 Animal Shelter periods) $ 35.00 $ 595.00 $ 25.00 $ 425.00 $ 155.00 $ 2,635.00 $ 100.00 $ 1,700.00
Spring &
summer every
Mo./Fall-Winter
every Other Mo
20 Public Safety Communications (9 mos) $ 30.00 $ 270.00 $ 35.00 $ 315.00 $ 92.50 $ 832.50 $ 50.00 $ 450.00
21 Central Fire Dept Every Other Mo. $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 125.00 $ 750.00 $ 50.00 $ 300.00
22 Training Center Every Other Mo. $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 125.00 $ 750.00 $ 50.00 $ 300.00
23 Station #2 Every Other Mo. $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 125.00 $ 750.00 $ 50.00 $ 300.00
24 Station #3 Every Other Mo. $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 125.00 $ 750.00 $ 50.00 $ 300.00
25 Station #4 Every Other Mo. $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 125.00 $ 750.00 $ 50.00 $ 300.00
26 Station #5 Every Other Mo. $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 125.00 $ 750.00 $ 50.00 $ 300.00
27 Station #6 Every Other Mo. $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 125.00 $ 750.00 $ 50.00 $ 300.00
28 Station #7 Every Other Mo. $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 125.00 $ 750.00 $ 50.00 $ 300.00
29 Station #8 Every Other Mo. $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 25.00 $ 150.00 $ 125.00 $ 750.00 $ 50.00 $ 300.00
30 Water Distribution And Collection Monthly $ 30.00 $ 360.00 $ 22.00 $ 264.00 $ 152.50 $ 1,830.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00
31 Cemetery Office Quarterly $ 20.00 $ 80.00 $ 35.00 $ 140.00 $ 62.50 $ 250.00 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
32 Parks Dept. Quarterly $ 20.00 $ 80.00 $ 35.00 $ 140.00 $ 125.00 $ 500.00 $ 100.00 $ 400.00
33 Santa Fe Train Museum Quarterly $ 20.00 $ 80.00 $ 30.00 $ 120.00 $ 125.00 $ 500.00 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
34 Emergency Operations Center Monthly $ 20.00 $ 240.00 $ 17.00 $ 204.00 $ 125.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00
35 Ralph Chase State Services Center Monthly $ 25.00 $ 300.00 $ 25.00 $ 300.00 $ 300.00 $ 3,600.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00
36 Texas Workforce Solutions Monthly $ 25.00 $ 300.00 $ 25.00 $ 300.00 $ 225.00 $ 2,700.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00
37 Employee Health Clinic Monthly
C:Usersbryan.kendrickDesktop03-19-1302 PUR CFM-01-13Bid $ 20.00 $ 240.00 $ 22.00 $ 264.00 $ 92.50 $ 1,110.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00

8. CITY OF SAN ANGELO
BID TAB
CFM-01-13 PEST CONTROL SERVICE
February 1, 2013 / 2:00pm
Better Choice Bug Express Jim's Pest Control Thrash Pest Control
38 Airport Terminal Monthly $ 20.00 $ 240.00 $ 18.00 $ 216.00 $ 155.00 $ 1,860.00 $ 50.00 $ 600.00
Semi-Monthly
39 Control Tower (24 per year) $ 20.00 $ 480.00 $ 15.00 $ 360.00 $ 205.00 $ 4,920.00 $ 50.00 $ 1,200.00
Semi-Monthly
40 Flight Services Station (24 per year) $ 20.00 $ 480.00 $ 15.00 $ 360.00 $ 305.00 $ 7,320.00 $ 50.00 $ 1,200.00
41 Water Quality Lab Quarterly $20.00 $ 80.00 $25.00 $ 100.00 $102.50 $ 410.00 $50.00 $ 200.00
GRAND TOTAL $ 1,040.00 $ 10,415.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 9,790.00 $ 6,780.00 $ 74,507.50 $ 2,600.00 $ 25,250.00
Current number of certified pest control technicians: 2 10 2 5
none we have
Annual in already placed
Annual pay advance - 5% discounts in the 20% discount
List any discounts available (annual pay, etc.): 10% off discount bid for annual pay
Vendor Agrees to allow Piggy-Back Procurements Yes Yes Yes Yes
Will you accept Credit Card Payments? Yes Yes n No
If you accept Credit Card Payments, will you offer a discount? No No n/a n/a
If so, how much and what are the terms? N/a n.a n/a n/a
Invitation to Bids Mailed To:
A&A Pest San Angelo, TX Hi-Tech Pest Defense San Angelo, TX
A Ban Exterminators San Angelo, TX Orkin Pest Control Abilene, TX
B Better Choice Pest Control Tom Bean, TX Terminix International San Angelo, TX
Affordable Pest Control San Angelo, TX Pioneer Termite & Pest Control San Angelo, TX
Bug Experts Pest Control San Angelo, TX Rex Pest Control San Angelo, TX
Bug Express San Angelo, TX Rhino Pest Control Mertzon, TX
Farmers Daughter Landscape San Angelo, TX
C:Usersbryan.kendrickDesktop03-19-1302 PUR CFM-01-13Bid

9. City of San Angelo
Memo
Date: March 8, 2013
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Will Wilde, Water Utilities Director
Subject: Consent Item for March 19, 2013 Council Meeting
Contact: Ricky Dickson, Interim Water Utilities Director, 657-4209
Caption: Consideration of approving a residential lease renewal with David and Kerry Persely,
at Lot 104, Group Shady Point, 6678 Knickerbocker Road; and authorizing the Water Utilities Director
to execute the same.
Summary: The leaseholder’s current lease expires in 2043 and they would like to execute a new 40 year lease for
financing purposes.
History: Lease fees are current and there are no issues with the lease on this tract.
Financial Impact: Current lease fees: 2013-2016 $450.00
2017-2043 Market Value
New lease fees: 2013-2016 $540.00
2017-2053 Market Value
Related Vision Item (if applicable): None.
Other Information/Recommendation: It is recommended that the lease renewal be approved
and the Water Utilities Director be authorized to execute the lease. Staff recommends approval.
Attachments: Lease Renewal Agreement (Persely)
Presentation: None.
Publication: None.
Reviewed by Service Area Director: Ricky Dickson, Interim Water Utilities Director
March 8, 2013

10. LAKE NASWORTHY RESIDENTIAL LOT LEASE
This lease is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF SAN ANGELO, a
Texas municipal corporation, ("Lessor"), whose address is 72 W. College Avenue, San Angelo,
Tom Green County, Texas 76903, and David and wife, Kerry Persely, whose address is 6678
Knickerbocker Road, San Angelo, Texas 76904 ("Lessee").
I. DEMISE OF LEASED PREMISES
1.1 In consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and agreements set forth in this
lease, Lessor hereby demises and leases to Lessee, and Lessee hereby accepts and leases from
Lessor, the following described real property (hereinafter called "leased premises") situated in
San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas:
Lot 104, Group Shady Point, Lake Nasworthy Addition, according
to the map or plat of said Lake Nasworthy Campsites in the
custody of the Water Utilities Department of the City of San
Angelo (also commonly known as 6678 Knickerbocker Road).
II. TERM, FEES AND RENT
FIXED COMMENCEMENT AND TERMINATION DATE
2.1 This lease is granted for a period of forty (40) years having an effective date beginning
March 1, 2013 and ending April 30, 2053, in consideration of the initial payment of $150.00,
which payment includes the granting fee, receipt of which payment is hereby acknowledged, and
the further consideration of Lessee's payment of future annual rent in accordance with
subsequent paragraphs hereof and Lessee's compliance with the stipulations and conditions
hereinafter set forth.
TIME AND MANNER OF PAYMENT
2.2 Lessee shall pay annual rent to Lessor at the San Angelo Water Utilities Department, 72
W. College Avenue, San Angelo, Texas, 76903, or at such other place as Lessor may from time
to time designate by written notice to Lessee. Such rent shall be paid annually on or before July 1
during the term of this lease in accordance with the following schedule:
Dates Annual Rent
For the Years 2013 Through 2016 $540.00
For the Years 2017 Through 2052 * Market Value
1

11. * Annual rent shall be the appraised market value of the leased premises multiplied by a factor of
0.08. Such appraised market value shall be determined and adjusted in accordance with
applicable City ordinances in effect at the time of execution of this lease.
DELINQUENT PAYMENTS
2.3 Lessee shall pay to Lessor a late charge or interest for any rent received by Lessor after
the date that the rent is due in accordance with established ordinances, provided however, that
this provision for late charges or interest shall not be construed as a waiver of the right of Lessor
to terminate this lease at its option as authorized herein.
HOLD OVER
2.4 Any holding over by Lessee of the herein leased premises after the expiration of this
lease shall operate and be construed only as a tenancy from month to month, terminable at the
will of Lessor.
III. DEBTS RELATED TO LEASED PREMISES
UTILITIES
3.1 Any utility charges shall be paid in full by Lessee when due. Failure to pay such
charges may be deemed a default at the option of Lessor.
TAXES
3.2 It is further understood and agreed that Lessee shall pay and discharge all taxes, general
and special assessments, and other charges of every description which during the term of this
lease may be levied on or assessed against the leased premises and all interest therein and all
improvements and other property thereon, whether belonging to Lessor or Leaser to which either
of them may become liable. Lessee shall pay all such taxes, charges, and assessments to the
public officer charged with the collection thereof not less than fifteen (15) days before the same
shall become delinquent, and Lessee agrees to indemnify and save harmless Lessor from all such
taxes, charges and assessments. Failure to pay such taxes and special assessments as provided
herein may be deemed a default at the option of Lessor.
WATER, SEWAGE, PAVING IMPROVEMENTS
3.3 In the event the Lessor lays sewer and/or water lines on, adjacent to or in the vicinity of
the leased premises, Lessee agrees to pay the pro rata front-foot cost of laying said line or lines
as established by and in accordance with city policies then in existence.
3.4 Lessee expressly agrees that if city water or sewer lines are ever located within 200 feet
of the leased premises, Lessee will tie on to such service at its own expense at the price
established for that specific Lake Nasworthy area.
2

12. 3.5 In the event the Lessor institutes a paving program abutting the leased premises, Lessee
shall pay his pro rata share of paving, curb and gutter costs pursuant to prevailing city policies.
IV. RULES AND REGULATIONS
4.1 The rules and regulations provided in those certain ordinances of the City Council of the
City of San Angelo, ("Council"), adopted April 2, 1951, and now known as the Lake
Nasworthy-Twin Buttes Ordinances and any and all subsequent amendments adopted heretofore
or hereafter are expressly incorporated herein by reference as terms and conditions of this lease.
This lease is expressly made subject to any ordinances adopted in the future by the Council for
the regulation of Lake Nasworthy and surrounding property, including but not limited to, safety,
sanitation, and ecological requirements. This lease will be managed by the Water Utilities
Department of the City of San Angelo subject to the approval of the Council.
V. USE OF LEASED PREMISES
CONSTRUCTION BY LESSEE
5.1 The premises shall be used only for a single family residence and lawful uses incidental
thereto, and in this connection the following shall be applicable:
a. No structure shall be constructed in excess of two stories in height.
b. No dwelling or residence shall be located nearer than 75 feet to the 1,872.2 foot
elevation line.
c. No housetrailer, shack, tent, or temporary residence of any type shall be permitted on
the leased premises, and no garage or other accessory building shall be used as a
residence.
d. All structures shall have a foundation that complies with Lessor's building code.
e. No outside toilets shall be constructed or maintained on leased premises, and all
plumbing shall be connected with a sanitary sewer or with a septic tank which complies
in all respects to all state, county and city sanitation regulations and requirements. No
septic tank shall be placed, constructed, or maintained nearer than 75 feet to the 1,872.2
foot elevation line nor nearer than five (5) feet to any property line. All wastewater
facilities shall conform to all of the City's wastewater ordinances, where applicable. No
sewer or drain shall empty into the lake or be constructed so as to flow or wash into the
lake. No concrete storm drains may be constructed without the prior approval of the
Water Utilities Department, Zoning Board of Adjustment, Planning Commission and/or
Council, as applicable.
f. No structure shall be constructed closer than five (5) feet to any property line.
3

13. g. No trees may be removed from the leased premises without the prior written consent of
the Water Utilities Director.
h. No improvements or construction work of any kind, including but not limited to,
houses, boathouses, piers, pump houses, water wells, storage buildings, fences,
excavations, fills, and other types of structures or improvements, shall be built or
performed on leased premises without prior approval of the Water Utilities Department,
Zoning Board of Adjustment, Planning Commission and/or Council, as applicable.
i. Lessee agrees to comply with all provisions of the Official Code of the City of San
Angelo ("Code"), as such now exists or may hereafter be amended including, but not
limited to, those provisions regarding building permits and permit fees; inspections and
fees therefore; building, plumbing, electrical, and fire standards or requirements; and the
regulation of septic tanks.
j. After any permit is granted, Lessee expressly agrees that all improvements or
construction work shall be built or performed in strict compliance with the terms of the
permit and approval granted, that construction shall commence within six (6) months
following the date of the permit, and that all construction shall be completed within one
(1) year of the date of the permit.
k. Lessee may request from the Council a variance or deviation from any term or
condition contained herein.
l. The Council, prior to granting any extension of an existing lease or a new lease
covering the leased premises shall have the right to review the leased premises and
improvements thereon and submit in writing to the Lessee the requirements, if any, which
shall attach to and become a part of this lease, necessary for compliance with the
above-mentioned provisions of the Code. Failure of the Lessee to abide by and comply
with said requirements may be deemd a default at the option of Lessor.
RESERVATIONS AND EASEMENTS
5.2 Lessor, its agents or assigns, reserves the privilege and right at any time to execute and
deliver valid oil, gas and other mineral leases upon the leased premises, and valid right-of-way
easements for gas, oil, water, or wastewater pipelines, telephone, telegraph or electric pole
transmission lines on said premises, or any part thereof, and in such event this lease shall be
subject and subordinate to the rights, terms and privileges of any such oil, gas and other mineral
leases or such easements as may have been executed heretofore or hereafter by Lessor, its agents
or assigns. An easement across leased premises is hereby retained by Lessor for the purpose of
laying sewer and water lines and/or for necessary rights-of-way for roads, alleys or other
throughways.
VI. ENCUMBRANCE OF LEASEHOLD ESTATE
ENCUMBERING LEASEHOLD INTEREST ONLY
4

14. 6.1 Lessee shall not have the right to encumber the fee simple, but Lessee may request
Lessor's written consent (pursuant to article XII of this lease) to encumber the leasehold estate,
personal property or improvements made by Lessee which may be removed from the realty
without injury to the realty; provided however, that no mortgagee nor anyone who claims by,
through or under such mortgage or deed of trust shall, by virtue of such mortgage or deed trust,
acquire any greater or more extended rights than Lessee has under this lease but such mortgage
or deed of trust shall be in every respect subject, subservient and subordinate to all of the
conditions, provisions, requirements, covenants and obligations of this lease. The mortgagee
under any such deed of trust or mortgage shall have the right to assume this lease and perform its
terms and conditions to protect itself.
NOTICES TO LENDER
6.2 Any lender or mortgagee may notify Lessor in writing that a mortgage or deed of trust
has been given and executed by Lessee and furnish Lessor with the address to which it desires
copies of notices to be mailed. Lessor agrees to mail to lender or mortgagee or its designated
agent or representative, at the address given, a copy of any notice which Lessor gives, mails, or
serves on Lessee under the terms of this lease after receipt of such a notice from the lender or
mortgagee.
VII. CONDITION OF PREMISES
NO WARRANTY
7.1 LESSOR GIVES NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE
CONDITION OF THE LEASED PREMISES OR ANY IMPROVEMENTS THEREON,
INCLUDING WARRANTY OF HABITABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE.
AVAILABILITY AND USE OF LAKE WATER
7.2 Lessor in no way guarantees the accessibility of water to the leased premises nor the level
of water in Lake Nasworthy.
Lessee can use water from the lake, river, and/or wells on the premises for domestic
purposes and water of existing trees and shrubs; but no water will be removed from the premises.
Use of water for irrigation is expressly prohibited. Lessee shall use water in a conservative
manner, and any abusive use of water shall be grounds for denying the use of water to the
Lessee. Lessee shall pay the applicable water use charge as set by the Lessor, for water or raw
water usage, as the case may be.
VIII. REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE
LESSEE'S DUTY TO REPAIR AND MAINTAIN
5

15. 8.1 Lessee agrees to keep and maintain any and all structures erected or caused to be erected
or placed on the leased premises in good and tenantable condition, to maintain its appearance,
and to landscape and keep said premises cleared of all objectionable matter, things, and
vegetation. Leased premises shall not be used for the outside storage of usable materials for
unreasonable lengths of time. In the event Lessee shall fail to maintain leased premises in a
manner acceptable to Lessor, after notice to Lessee as prescribed by city ordinance, the Lessor
shall cause leased premises to be cleaned, cleared, and mowed. Lessee expressly authorizes the
cost of any such clearing, cleaning, and mowing to be billed to it or added to the next annual
rental payment, with interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum beginning thirty (30)
days from the date on which the work was completed, and continuing until such cost is paid in
full.
DAMAGE OR DESTRUCTION
8.2 The parties hereto acknowledge that the leased premises are within an area subject to
overflow and flooding and it is expressly agreed between the parties that neither Lessor nor any
of its agents or employees shall be liable to Lessee for any damages caused in any manner,
negligent or otherwise, by high water or floods at Lake Nasworthy, nor by the rivers or creeks
which serve as its sources of supply or diversion channels, nor by reason of any work deemed
necessary in Lessor's sole judgment in the maintenance of said Lake and sources of supply or
diversion channels and all damages occasioned thereby are hereby waived, and when Lessor (or
any agent thereof) deems it necessary to enter on the leased premises for any of the above
purposes, its judgment shall be conclusive.
IX. SUSPENSION OF PRIVILEGES
HEALTH MATTERS
9.1 It is expressly understood and agreed that Lessor may at any time, without notice to
Lessee or any mortgagee, suspend or revoke any and all privileges granted herein for such length
of time as in its sole judgment is necessary for the purpose of suppressing or arresting an
epidemic of any contagious or infectious disease, or when, in its sole judgment, any suspension
of privileges is necessary to protect the health of the water consumers of San Angelo, Texas. In
the event privileges are suspended by Lessor, rent shall be prorated; and if the lease is revoked,
Lessor shall pay Lessee an amount equal to the market value of any structures or improvements
hereto made or erected on leased premises in compliance with the terms of this lease.
PUBLIC PURPOSES
9.2 If Lessor shall deem that leased premises are required for any public purpose or that
condemnation is necessary, Lessor shall have the right to terminate this lease by giving ninety
(90) days written notice of such termination to Lessee and any mortgagee who has notified the
Water Utilities Department of its lien and its address for notice purposes; and Lessee agrees to
promptly deliver possession of leased premises to Lessor; and this lease shall terminate upon the
expiration of ninety (90)days after the date of such notice; and in such event Lessor shall pay
6

16. Lessee an amount equal to the market value of any structures or improvements hereto made or
erected on leased premises in compliance with the terms of this lease.
X. RELEASE
10.1 Lessee expressly releases Lessor, its officers, agents, and employees from any and all
claims for damages of any kind by reason of the condition of the premises hereby leased, or any
improvements thereon or any damages incurred in the enjoyment or exercise of the privileges
granted hereunder, or for damage to its person or property caused by the opening of the gates at
Nasworthy Dam, the lowering of the normal water elevation in the lake, or due to flood or high
water, or any fluctuating water levels which may arise in the use and operation of Lake
Nasworthy, or in the joint use and operation of Lake Nasworthy, San Angelo Reservoir, and
Twin Buttes Reservoir for the purposes of recreation, irrigation, and water supply, or for any
other purpose.
XI. INDEMNIFICATION
11.1 LESSEE FURTHER AGREES FOR LESSEE AND LESSEE’SSUCCESORS IN
INTEREST TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD LESSOR, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, AND
EMPLOYEES, FREE AND HARMLESS FROM ANY CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OR
INJURY, INCLUDING DEATH, TO PERSONS OR PROPERTY, OR ANY LIABILITY
INCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE EXERCISE OF THE PRIVILEGES CONFERRED BY
THIS LEASE, AND AGREES TO REIMBURSE LESSOR FOR ANY EXPENSES
INCURRED IN THE DEFENSE OF ANY SUCH CLAIM, INCLUDING REASONABLE
ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COURT COSTS ACTUALLY INCURRED. NOTHING HEREIN
SHALL REQUIRE THE INDEMNIFYING PARTY TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND OR
HOLDHARMLESS ANY INDEMNIFIED PARTY FOR THE INDEMNIFIED PARTY’S
OWN GROSS NEGLIGENCE OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT. THIS INDEMNIFICATION
SHALL SURVIVE THE TERM OF THIS LEASE AS LONG AS ANY LIABILITY COULD
BE ASSERTED.
XII. TRANSFER, ASSIGNMENT, AND SUBLETTING
12.1 Lessee may not transfer or assign the leased premises, in whole or in part, without the
prior written consent of the Lessor, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld. Lessee
may not sublet the leased premises, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the
Lessor. Any such transfer, assignment or sublease shall be evidenced in writing, properly
executed and acknowledged by both parties thereto; a copy shall be delivered to Lessor and the
original shall be recorded in the office of the County Clerk of Tom Green County, Texas. It is
agreed, however, that each such transfer, assignment or sublease shall bind the transferee,
assignee or sublessee to the obligations of Lessee to Lessor as set forth in this lease and shall not
release Lessee from Lessee's obligations under the lease.
XIII. DEFAULT AND REMEDIES
DEFAULT
7

17. 13.1 (a) Any breach of this lease by Lessee, other than the non-payment of rent, may result in
irreparable damage to Lessor for which Lessor will not have an adequate remedy at law. If
Lessee should default with respect to any of its obligations hereunder except with respect to the
non-payment of rent, and should fail within 60 days after written notice of such default from the
Lessor to cure such default, then Lessee agrees that that Lessor shall be entitled to immediately
seek relief by action or proceeding at law for damages, for specific performance and injunction,
without any requirement to post a bond or other security.
(b) In addition to, and independent of, the provisions of subsection (a), above, should
Lessee violate any provision of this Lease, other than the non-payment of rent, and fail or refuse
to cure such violation within 60 days after written notice of such default from Lessor, then
Lessor or Lessor’s agents may enter the premises as reasonably necessary to perform the work
required as determined by Lessor to cure the default and the costs thereof shall be deemed to be
additional rent, immediately due and payable upon written notice to Lessee of the sum of
expenses, costs, and fees so incurred by Lessor, including an assessment for the cost related to
Lessor’s employee time in curing the default, if any. LESSEE HEREBY WAIVES ANY
CLAIM FOR TRESSPASS OR DAMAGES RELATING TO LESSOR OR LESSOR’S
AGENTS OR EMPLOYEES ENTRY ONTO THE LEASEHOLD PREMISES PURSUANT TO
THE PROVSIONS OF THIS LEASE.
(c) A breach of this lease by Lessee for non-payment of rent shall result in termination of
this lease should Lessee within 60 days after written notice of default setting forth the amount
past due fail to cure such default by making payment of the full amount due Lessor.
POSSESSION
13.2 Lessee agrees at the termination of this lease to deliver possession peacefully to the
Lessor or its agents or employees; and if it fails to give peaceful possession, Lessor may take
forceful possession of said premises and eject all parties therefrom without being guilty of
trespass; and all damages occasioned thereby are hereby waived.
REMOVAL OF IMPROVEMENTS
13.3 All buildings and other improvements placed on the property by Lessee (except trees,
shrubs, flowers and plants) which may be removed without injury to the realty shall remain the
property of Lessee. It is understood and agreed, however, that buildings and improvements shall
be held by the Lessor until all rentals due Lessor by Lessee shall have been paid, and should any
amount remain unpaid for more than thirty (30) days after termination of this lease, the Lessor
shall have the right to sell such buildings and improvements and apply the proceeds to the
amount due Lessor, with interest at the annual rate of ten percent (10%), and to any costs
incident to the sale, and pay the balance remaining, if any, to Lessee. All property remaining on
the premises after the expiration of ninety (90) days following the termination of this lease,
however terminated, shall be deemed abandoned by Lessee and shall become the property of
Lessor.
8

18. OTHER REMEDIES
13.4 (a) Any termination of this lease shall not relieve Lessee from the payment of any sum or
sums that are due and payable to Lessor under the lease, or any claim for damages then or
previously accruing against Lessee under this lease, and any such termination shall not prevent
Lessor from enforcing the payment of any such sum or sums or claim for damages by any
remedy provided for by law, or from recovering damages from Lessee for any default under the
lease. All rights, options, and remedies of Lessor contained in this lease shall be construed and
held to be cumulative, and no one of them shall be exclusive of the other, and Lessor shall have
the right to pursue any one or all of such remedies or any other remedy or relief which may be
provided by law, whether or not stated in this lease. No waiver by Lessor of a breach of any of
the covenants, conditions, or restrictions of this lease shall be construed or held to be a waiver of
any succeeding or preceding breach of the same or any other covenant, condition, or restriction
contained in this lease.
(b) The remedies provided herein shall not be exclusive of other remedies. A failure by
the Lessor to take action on any past violation shall not constitute a waiver of the Lessor’s right
to take action on any subsequent violation.
XIV. MISCELLANEOUS
RELATIONSHIP OF LESSOR AND LESSEE
14.1 The relationship between Lessor and Lessee at all times shall remain solely that of
landlord and tenant and shall not be deemed a partnership or joint venture.
PARTIES BOUND
14.2 This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties of the lease
and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, legal representatives, successors and
assigns.
HEADINGS
14.3 The paragraph headings contained herein are for convenience and reference and are not
intended to define, extend or limit the scope of any provisions of this lease.
SUPERSEDES PRIOR AGREEMENTS
14.4 If this lease replaces another lease, all prior agreements are superseded by this lease.
ENTIRE AGREEMENT/AMENDMENTS
14.5 This lease constitutes the entire agreement between the parties, and Lessor is not bound
by any agreement, condition or stipulation, understanding or representation made by any of
9

19. Lessor’s agents not contained herein. No amendment to this lease shall be effective unless such
is in writing and signed by both parties.
VIOLATIONS OF LEASE
14.6 IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES THAT
THE VIOLATION OF ANY TERM, STIPULATION, CONDITION, OR COVENANT,
SHALL ENTITLE THE LESSOR, AT ITS OPTION, TO TERMINATE THIS LEASE.
FAILURE TO EXERCISE SUCH OPTION AT ANY TIME SHALL NEVER BE
CONSTRUED AS A WAIVER OF ANY CONDITION OF THIS LEASE.
TEXAS LAW TO APPLY
14.7 The parties hereby agree that Texas law will control the interpretation or enforcement of
this lease. This lease has been executed in Texas, and all obligations hereunder are performable
in Tom Green County, Texas.
INVALID OR ILLEGAL PROVISIONS
14.8 If any provision of this lease is held invalid as to any person or set of circumstances, such
holding shall not affect the validity of any remaining provision of this lease or any provision’s
application to other persons not similarly situated or to other circumstances.
REIMBURSEMENT OF LESSOR’S EXPENSES
14.9 Lessee shall pay on demand all of Lessor’s expenses including, but not limited to,
attorney’s fees and court costs incurred in enforcing any of Lessee’s obligations under this lease,
which include, but are not limited to, collection of rental fees and collection of utility payments,
taxes and other legitimate assessments.
NOTICES
14.9 All notices concerning this lease shall be in writing and delivered to the parties at the
addresses below:
LESSEE: David and Kerry Persely
6678 Knickerbocker Road
San Angelo, Texas 76904
LESSOR: City of San Angelo
Attn: Water Utilities Director
72 W. College Avenue
San Angelo, Texas 76903
[SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]
10

20. EXECUTED in duplicate originals on the _____day of _____________________, 2013
by:
LESSEE
David Persely
Kerry Persely
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF TOM GREEN §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the _____day of ________________,
2013 by David and Kerry Persely.
Notary Public, State of Texas
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, LESSOR
BY:
RICKY DICKSON
Water Utilities Department
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF TOM GREEN §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the _____day of ________________,
2012, by Ricky Dickson, Interim Director of Water Utilities of the City of San Angelo, a Texas
home rule municipal corporation, on behalf of said corporation.
Notary Public, State of Texas
11

21. City of San Angelo
Memo
Date: March 4, 2013
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Cindy M. Preas, Real Estate Administrator (657-4407)
Subject: Agenda Item for March 19, 2013 Council Meeting
Contact: Diana Farris, Property Specialist (657-4407)
Caption: Consent Item
Consideration of adopting a Resolution of the City of San Angelo authorizing the
mayor to execute a tax-resale (quitclaim) deed conveying all right, title and interest
of the City of San Angelo, and all other taxing units interested in the tax
foreclosure judgment:
1944 & 1948 Magnolia Street, (Gonzalez), Lots 1 & 2, Block 2, Avondale, $1,000, Suit
No.B99-0081-T
207 E Avenue L, (Perez), E 50’ x 238’ of a 1 acre Tract, Fisher Miller, $750, Suit
No.TAX89-0388B
725 Hughes Street, (Salinas), Lot 9, Block 2, Culwell, $950, Suit No. B-03-0087-T
816 Volney, (Salinas) Portion of Lots 6-8, Block 28, Miles, 1,500, Suit No. B-05-0192-T
111 E 13th Street, (Salinas), Lot 7, Block 57, Miles, ($1,200) Suit No. B-97-0170-T
th
329 13 Street, (Salinas), Lot 2, Block 2, Pecan Place, $750, Suit No.TAX90-0083B
1916 Shelton, (Sanchez), S ½ of Lot 12, Block 3, Home Acres, $2,500, Suit No.B-00-
0043-T
Summary: The subject properties were auctioned at Sheriff’s Sale. No offers were received
causing subject properties to be stuck-off to the City, as Trustee for itself and the
other taxing entities.
History: The attached Property Analysis reflects amounts of delinquent taxes, accrued
penalties, interest, attorney fees and costs for delinquent years of, together with
additional penalties and interest at the rates prescribed by Chapter 33, Texas
Property Tax Code.
Financial Impact: Upon approval: (1) The City will retain a $500 Administration fee; (2) The balance
will be distributed according to the judgment on the Sheriff’s Return; and (3)
Property will be reinstated back onto tax roll.
Related Vision Item Financial Vision – Examine liquidation of unused or underperforming city-owned
properties
(if applicable):
Neighborhood Vision – Attract reinvestment
Other Information/ Staff recommends approval.
Recommendation:
Attachments: Property Analysis, Resolution, Tax-Resale Deed and Property Location Map
Adopted: 5/30/03
Revised: 6/21/10

22. Presentation: N/A
Publication: N/A
Reviewed by Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney
Director:
Approved by Legal:

23. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR TO EXECUTE A TAX-RESALE (QUITCLAIM) DEED
CONVEYING ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF THE CITY OF
SAN ANGELO, AND ALL OTHER TAXING UNITS INTERESTED IN
THE TAX FORECLOSURE JUDGMENT
WHEREAS, by Sheriff’s Sale, the properties described below were struck-off to the City of
San Angelo, Trustee, pursuant to delinquent tax foreclosure decrees of the 119th and 340th
Judicial Districts, Tom Green County, Texas; and
WHEREAS, offers have been made for the purchase of said properties pursuant to Section
34.05, Texas Tax Code Ann.(Vernon, 1982); and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN ANGELO that its Mayor, Alvin New, is hereby authorized to execute a Tax-Resale
(quitclaim) Deed conveying the following described real properties to the following as specified
below, all of the right, title, and interest of the City of San Angelo, and all other taxing units
interested in the tax foreclosure judgment, located in San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas:
Conveying to:
CARLOS GONZALEZ, a single person; ($1,000):
Lots 1 & 2, Block 2, Avondale Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas,
according to the map or plat thereof, recorded in Volume 1, Page 86, Plat Records of
Tom Green County, Texas.
Account #02-12400-0002-001-00
#02-12400-0002-002-00
GILBERT PEREZ, JR., a single person; ($750):
The East 50’ x 238’ of a 1.00 acre Tract described in Volume 39, Page 621, Deed
Records, said East 50’ being described in Volume 361, Page 196, Deed of Tom Green
County, Texas.
Account #38-00205-0013-000-00
RICHARD SALINAS, a married person as his sole and separate property; ($1,200):
Lot 9, Block 2, Culwell Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as
described in deed recorded in Volume 648, Page 622, Deed Records of Tom Green
County, Texas.
Account #07-19800-0002-008-00
RICHARD SALINAS, a married person as his sole and separate property; ($1,200):
Lot 7, Block 57, Miles Addition to the City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as
described in Volume 85, Page 576, Deed Records, Tom Green County, Texas.
Account #19-34200-0057-007-00

24. RICHARD SALINAS, a married person as his sole and separate property; ($1,500):
A portion of Lots 6, 7 and 8, Block 28, Miles Addition, an addition to the City of San
Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in deed dated March 20, 1974 from
Donald Nelson Holley, et ux. To George Jones, Sr., et ux., in Volume 611, Page 583,
Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas.
Account #18-34200-0028-009-00
RICHARD SALINAS, a married person as his sole and separate property; ($750):
Lot 2, Block 2, Pecan Place, being more particularly described in Volume 251, Page 235,
Deed Records of Tom Green, Texas.
Account #21-38600-0002-002-00
MARIA ROSA SANCHEZ, a single person, and LILLIANA SANCHEZ, a single person;
($2,500):
The South one-half of Lot 12, Block 3, Home Acres Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green
County, Texas, as described in Volume 288, Page 55, Deed Records of Tom Green County,
Texas.
Account #15-28100-0003-029-00
APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF , 2013.
THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO
_______________________________
Alvin New, Mayor
Attest:
______________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
Approved As to Content: Approved As to Form:
______________________________ ______________________________
Cindy M. Preas, Real Estate Administrator Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

26. PROPERTY ANALYSIS
For Tax Resale Property
Legal Description: Lots 1 & 2, Block 2, Avondale Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County,
Texas, according to the map or plat thereof, recorded in Volume 1, Page 86, Plat
Records of Tom Green County, Texas.
Improved/Unimproved Unimproved
Tax Suit Number: B99-0081-T
Location: 1944 & 1948 Magnolia Street
Parcel Size/Dimensions: 50' x 130'
City of San Angelo vs. J.F. Kite, Addie Kite, Mrs. N.E. Hicks Account #1391
Tax ID Number: #02-12400-0002-001-00 #02-12400-0002-002-00
Tax Warrant Date: October 26, 1999
Date of Sheriff's Sale: December 7, 1999
Sheriff's Deed Recorded: January 6, 2000
Years Held in Trust 13 YRS
Adjudge Value: $ 1,800.00 Purchased under Urban Redevelopment No
Amount of Offer: $ 1,000.00
Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts
Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations Distributed
Administration Fee $500.00 $500.00 0.00% $500.00
Maintenance Fee $ 1,820.00 100.00% $ 500.00 $ 500.00
District Clerk $ - 0.00% $ -
Sheriff's Fee $ - 0.00% $ -
Attorney Fee $ - 0.00% $ -
Municipal Liens $ - $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00
Taxes $ - $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00
Total $2,320.00 $ - $500.00 100.00% $ 500.00 $1,000.00
Actual Total Amt Due $2,320.00
Amount Remaining $ 500.00
All costs according to the Tax Warrant have been perviously paid. Offer will satisfy a portion of the Maintenance costs.

27. NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove or
strike any or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record in
the public records: your social security number or your driver’s license number.
Tax-Resale Deed
(Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value)
Date: __________________________
Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee
for itself, Tom Green County, and San Angelo Independent School District
72 West College Avenue
San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903
Grantee: CARLOS GONZALEZ, a single person
725 Amberton Parkway
San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76901
Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration
Property (including any improvements):
Lots 1 & 2, Block 2, Avondale Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas,
according to the map or plat thereof, recorded in Volume 1, Page 86, Plat Records of Tom
Green County, Texas.
Account #02-12400-0002-001-00
#02-12400-0002-002-00
Tax Warrant: Tax Warrant for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on October 26, 1999
in Suit No. B-99-0081-T by the 340th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas.
Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for
all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the
terms of the Tax Warrant — by Sheriff’s Deed dated January 5, 2000, and recorded in
Volume 751, Page 622, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas.
For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to
execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the
City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantor's right, title, and interest in and
to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantee's heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither
Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Tax Warrant, nor any other person or entity claiming under
them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax-
Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by
common law and the warranties in § 5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically
excluded.
Grantee's rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code,
including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms
of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in

28. which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was
not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date of
the sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose.
Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the market
value specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment.
Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and all
future years.
When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural.
GRANTOR:
The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule
municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for
any taxing authorities named in the Judgment
ATTEST: By: ____________________________
Alvin New, Mayor and
duly-authorized agent
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
STATE OF TEXAS §
§
COUNTY OF TOM GREEN §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2013, by Alvin New,
Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, on
behalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in the
above instrument.
__________________________________
Notary Public, State of Texas
After Recording, Return To:

29. E 50' x 238' of a 1 acre tract, Fisher & Miller
Addition
207 E Avenue L 50' x 238'
Copyright 2011 Esri. All rights reserved. Tue Dec 20 2011 04:46:45 PM.

31. PROPERTY ANALYSIS
For Tax Resale Property
Legal Description: The East 50’ x 238’ of a 1.00 acre Tract out of Fisher & Miller, described in Volume
39, Page 621, Deed Records, said East 50’ being described in Volume 361, Page
196, Deed of Tom Green County, Texas.
Improved/Unimproved Unimproved
Tax Suit Number: TAX89-0388b
Location: 207 E Avenue L
Parcel Size/Dimensions: 50' x 238'
City of San Angelo vs. Balente Martinez a/k/a Valente Martinez Account #1448
Tax ID Number: #38-00205-0013-000-00
Judgment Date: October 14, 1992
Date of Sheriff's Sale: August 1, 1995
Sheriff's Deed Recorded: October 25, 1995
Years Held in Trust 18 YRS
Adjudge Value: $ 4,375.00 Purchased under Urban Redevelopment No
Amount of Offer: $ 750.00
Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts
Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations Distributed
Administration Fee $500.00 $500.00 0.00% $500.00
Maintenance Fee 0.00% $ -
District Clerk $ 131.00 21.84% $ 54.59 $ 54.59
Sheriff's Fee $ 156.93 26.16% $ 65.40 $ 65.40
Attorney Fee $ 311.98 52.00% $ 130.01 $ 130.01
Municipal Liens $ - $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00
Taxes $ - $3,775.09 0.00% $0.00 $0.00
Total $500.00 $3,775.09 $500.00 100.00% $ 250.00 $750.00
Actual Total Amt Due $4,275.09 $ 599.91
Amount Remaining $ 250.00
Offer will satisfy all costs according to the Judgment.

32. NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove or
strike any or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record in
the public records: your social security number or your driver’s license number.
Tax-Resale Deed
(Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value)
Date: __________________________
Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee
for itself, Tom Green County, and San Angelo Independent School District
72 West College Avenue
San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903
Grantee: GILBERT PEREZ, JR, a single person
712 Era Street
San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76905
Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration
Property (including any improvements):
The East 50’ x 238’ of a 1.00 acre Tract described in Volume 39, Page 621, Deed Records,
said East 50’ being described in Volume 361, Page 196, Deed of Tom Green County, Texas.
Account #38-00205-0013-000-00
Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on October 14, 1992 in
Suit No. TAX89-0388-B by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas.
Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for
all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the
terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated September 20, 1995, and recorded in
Volume 502, Page 55, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas.
For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to
execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the
City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantor's right, title, and interest in and
to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantee's heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither
Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Judgment, nor any other person or entity claiming under
them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax-
Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by
common law and the warranties in § 5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically
excluded.
Grantee's rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code,
including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms
of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in
which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was

33. not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date of
the sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose.
Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the market
value specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment.
Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and all
future years.
When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural.
GRANTOR:
The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule
municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for
any taxing authorities named in the Judgment
ATTEST: By: ____________________________
Alvin New, Mayor and
duly-authorized agent
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
STATE OF TEXAS §
§
COUNTY OF TOM GREEN §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2013, by Alvin New,
Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, on
behalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in the
above instrument.
__________________________________
Notary Public, State of Texas
After Recording, Return To:

34. 725 Hughes Street, Lot 9, Block 2, Culwell Addition 60' x 115'
March 5, 2013 1:1,349
0 0.01 0.02 0.04 mi
Zip Codes
0 0.0175 0.035 0.07 km
City Address Points Copyright:© 2013 ESRI, NAVTEQ, DeLorme
Pending City Addresses

35. PROPERTY ANALYSIS
For Tax Resale Property
Legal Description: Lot 9, Block 2, Culwell Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as
described in deed recorded in Volume 648, Page 622, Deed Records of Tom Green
County, Texas.
Improved/Unimproved Unimproved
Tax Suit Number: B-03-0087-T
Location: 725 Hughes Street
Parcel Size/Dimensions: 52' x 86'
City of San Angelo vs. John D. Northcutt Account #6883
Tax ID Number: #07-19800-0002-008-00
Judgment Date: January 18, 2005
Date of Sheriff's Sale: April 4, 2006
Sheriff's Deed Recorded: April 11, 2006
Years Held in Trust 7 YRS
Adjudge Value: $ 2,100.00 Purchased under Urban Redevelopment No
Amount of Offer: $ 1,200.00
Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts
Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations Distributed
Administration Fee $500.00 $500.00 0.00% $500.00
Maintenance Fee $ 980.00 0.00% $ -
District Clerk $236.00 $236.00 0.00% $236.00
Sheriff's Fee $100.00 $100.00 0.00% $100.00
Attorney Fee $332.00 $332.00 0.00% $332.00
Municipal Liens $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00
Taxes $1,778.00 100.00% $32.00 $32.00
Total $2,148.00 $ 1,778.00 $1,168.00 100.00% $ 32.00 $1,200.00
Actual Total Amt Due $3,926.00
Amount Remaining $ 32.00
Offer will satisfy all court costs and a small portion of the Taxes.

36. NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove or
strike any or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record in
the public records: your social security number or your driver’s license number.
Tax-Resale Deed
(Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value)
Date: __________________________
Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee
for itself, Tom Green County, and San Angelo Independent School District
72 West College Avenue
San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903
Grantee: RICHARD SALINAS, a married person as his sole and separate property
2107 Greenwood
San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76901
Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration
Property (including any improvements):
Lot 9, Block 2, Culwell Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as
described in deed recorded in Volume 648, Page 622, Deed Records of Tom Green
County, Texas.
Account #07-19800-0002-008-00
Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on January 18, 2005 in
Suit No. B-03-0087-T by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas.
Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for
all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the
terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated April 11, 2006, and recorded in
Instrument Number 609008, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County,
Texas.
For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to
execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the
City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantor's right, title, and interest in and
to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantee's heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither
Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Judgment, nor any other person or entity claiming under
them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax-
Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by
common law and the warranties in § 5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically
excluded.
Grantee's rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code,
including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms
of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in

37. which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was
not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date of
the sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose.
Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the market
value specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment.
Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and all
future years.
When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural.
GRANTOR:
The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule
municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for
any taxing authorities named in the Judgment
ATTEST: By: ____________________________
Alvin New, Mayor and
duly-authorized agent
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
STATE OF TEXAS §
§
COUNTY OF TOM GREEN §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2013, by Alvin New,
Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, on
behalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in the
above instrument.
__________________________________
Notary Public, State of Texas
After Recording, Return To:

38. 816 Volney Street, A Portion of Lots 6,7 & 8 , Block 28, Miles Addition 40' x 120'
March 5, 2013 1:2,699
0 0.0225 0.045 0.09 mi
City Address Points County Address Points Parcels Abandonments Approved
0 0.035 0.07 0.14 km
Pending City Addresses Pending County Addresses Platted Lot Line Labels Abandonments Denied
Copyright:© 2013 ESRI, NAVTEQ, DeLorme
Retired City Addresses Retired County Addresses Platted Lot Lines Abandonments Expired

39. PROPERTY ANALYSIS
For Tax Resale Property
Legal Description: A portion of Lots 6, 7 and 8, Block 28, Miles Addition, an addition to the City of San
Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in deed dated March 20, 1974 from
Donald Nelson Holley, et ux. to George Jones, Sr., et ux., in Volume 611, Page 583,
Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas.
Improved/Unimproved Unimproved
Tax Suit Number: B-05-0192-T
Location: 816 Volney Street
Parcel Size/Dimensions: 40' x 120'
City of San Angelo vs. Joseph Jones Acct-Unknown Lula B. Jones Acct #3835 Sylvia A. Jenkins Acct #1365
Tax ID Number: #18-34200-0028-009-00
Judgment Date: August 7, 2009
Date of Sheriff's Sale: November 3, 2009
Sheriff's Deed Recorded: November 23, 2009
Years Held in Trust 4 YRS
Adjudge Value: $ 3,000.00 Purchased under Urban Redevelopment No
Amount of Offer: $ 1,900.00
Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts
Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations Distributed
Administration Fee $500.00 $500.00 0.00% $500.00
Maintenance Fee $ 560.00 $0.00 100.00% $ 402.00 $ 402.00
District Clerk $ 533.00 $ 533.00 0.00% $533.00
Sheriff's Fee $ 100.00 $ 100.00 0.00% $100.00
Attorney Fee $ 365.00 $ 365.00 0.00% $365.00
Municipal Liens $981.22 0.00% $0.00 $0.00
Taxes $6,101.42 0.00% $0.00 $0.00
Total $1,060.00 $ 8,080.64 $1,498.00 100.00% $ 402.00 $1,900.00
Actual Total Amt Due $9,140.64
Amount Remaining $ 402.00
Offer will satisfy all court cost according to the Judgment.

40. NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove or
strike any or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record in
the public records: your social security number or your driver’s license number.
Tax-Resale Deed
(Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value)
Date: __________________________
Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee
for itself, Tom Green County, and San Angelo Independent School District
72 West College Avenue
San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903
Grantee: RICHARD SALINAS, a married person as his sole and separate property
2107 Greenwood
San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76901
Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration
Property (including any improvements):
A portion of Lots 6, 7 and 8, Block 28, Miles Addition, an addition to the City of San
Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in deed dated March 20, 1974 from
Donald Nelson Holley, et ux. To George Jones, Sr., et ux., in Volume 611, Page 583,
Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas.
Account #18-34200-0028-009-00
Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on August 7, 2009 in
Suit No. B-05-0192-T by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas.
Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for
all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the
terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated November 20, 2009, and recorded in
Instrument Number 678726, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County,
Texas.
For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to
execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the
City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantor's right, title, and interest in and
to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantee's heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither
Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Judgment, nor any other person or entity claiming under
them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax-
Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by
common law and the warranties in § 5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically
excluded.
Grantee's rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code,
including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms

41. of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in
which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was
not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date of
the sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose.
Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the market
value specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment.
Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and all
future years.
When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural.
GRANTOR:
The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule
municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for
any taxing authorities named in the Judgment
ATTEST: By: ____________________________
Alvin New, Mayor and
duly-authorized agent
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
STATE OF TEXAS §
§
COUNTY OF TOM GREEN §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2013, by Alvin New,
Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, on
behalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in the
above instrument.
__________________________________
Notary Public, State of Texas
After Recording, Return To:

42. 111 E 13th Street, Lot 7, Block 57, Miles Addition 50' x 100'
March 5, 2013 1:1,349
0 0.01 0.02 0.04 mi
Zip Codes
0 0.0175 0.035 0.07 km
City Address Points Copyright:© 2013 ESRI, NAVTEQ, DeLorme
Pending City Addresses

43. PROPERTY ANALYSIS
For Tax Resale Property
Legal Description: Lot 7, Block 57, Miles Addition to the City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as
described in Volume 85, Page 576, Deed Records, Tom Green County, Texas.
Improved/Unimproved Unimproved
Tax Suit Number: B-97-0170-T
Location: 111 E 13th Street
Parcel Size/Dimensions: 50' x 100'
City of San Angelo vs. Frank B. Snodgrass, Jr. Account #1692
Tax ID Number: #19-34200-0057-007-00
Judgment Date: July 7, 1999
Date of Sheriff's Sale: March 5, 2002
Sheriff's Deed Recorded: March 25, 2002
Years Held in Trust 11 YRS
Adjudge Value: $ 3,000.00 Purchased under Urban Redevelopment No
Amount of Offer: $ 1,200.00
Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts
Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations Distributed
Administration Fee $500.00 $500.00 0.00% $500.00
Maintenance Fee $ 1,540.00 $0.00 100.00% $ 317.00 $ 317.00
District Clerk $ 103.00 $ 103.00 0.00% $103.00
Sheriff's Fee $ 40.00 $ 40.00 0.00% $40.00
Attorney Fee $ 240.00 $ 240.00 0.00% $240.00
Municipal Liens $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00
Taxes $3,298.48 0.00% $0.00 $0.00
Total $2,040.00 $ 3,681.48 $883.00 100.00% $ 317.00 $1,200.00
Actual Total Amt Due $5,721.48
Amount Remaining $ 317.00
Offer will satisfy all court cost according to the Judgment.

44. NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove or
strike any or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record in
the public records: your social security number or your driver’s license number.
Tax-Resale Deed
(Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value)
Date: __________________________
Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee
for itself, Tom Green County, and San Angelo Independent School District
72 West College Avenue
San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903
Grantee: RICHARD SALINAS, a married person as his sole and separate property
2107 Greenwood
San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76901
Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration
Property (including any improvements):
Lot 7, Block 57, Miles Addition to the City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as
described in Volume 85, Page 576, Deed Records, Tom Green County, Texas.
Account #19-34200-0057-007-00
Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on July 7, 1999 in Suit
No. B-97-0170-T by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas.
Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for
all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the
terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated March 25, 2002, and recorded in
Volume 902, Page 534, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas.
For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to
execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the
City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantor's right, title, and interest in and
to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantee's heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither
Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Judgment, nor any other person or entity claiming under
them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax-
Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by
common law and the warranties in § 5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically
excluded.
Grantee's rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code,
including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms
of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in
which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was

45. not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date of
the sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose.
Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the market
value specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment.
Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and all
future years.
When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural.
GRANTOR:
The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule
municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for
any taxing authorities named in the Judgment
ATTEST: By: ____________________________
Alvin New, Mayor and
duly-authorized agent
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
STATE OF TEXAS §
§
COUNTY OF TOM GREEN §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2013, by Alvin New,
Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, on
behalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in the
above instrument.
__________________________________
Notary Public, State of Texas
After Recording, Return To:

46. Lot 2, Block 2, Pecan Place Addition
329 E 13th St 52' x 86'
Copyright 2011 Esri. All rights reserved. Thu Dec 22 2011 09:08:38 AM.

48. PROPERTY ANALYSIS
For Tax Resale Property
Legal Description: Lot 2, Block 2, Pecan Place, being more particularly described in Volume 251, Page
235, Deed Records of Tom Green, Texas.
Improved/Unimproved Unimproved
Tax Suit Number: TAX90-0083B
Location: 329 13th Street
Parcel Size/Dimensions: 52' x 86'
City of San Angelo vs. Roy L. Mayo Account #918
Tax ID Number: 21-38600-0002-002-00
Judgment Date: June 16, 1993
Date of Sheriff's Sale: February 4, 1997
Sheriff's Deed Recorded: February 21, 1997
Years Held in Trust 16 YRS
Adjudge Value: $ 4,269.00 Purchased under Urban Redevelopment No
Amount of Offer: $ 750.00
Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts
Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations Distributed
Administration Fee $500.00 $500.00 0.00% $500.00
Maintenance Fee $ 2,240.00 $0.00 100.00% $ 250.00 $ 250.00
District Clerk $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00
Sheriff's Fee $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00
Attorney Fee $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00
Municipal Liens $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00
Taxes $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00
Total $2,740.00 $ - $500.00 100.00% $ 250.00 $750.00
Actual Total Amt Due $2,740.00
Amount Remaining $ 250.00
Offer will satisfy a portion of the fees. No costs are due.

49. NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove or
strike any or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record in
the public records: your social security number or your driver’s license number.
Tax-Resale Deed
(Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value)
Date: __________________________
Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee
for itself, Tom Green County, and San Angelo Independent School District
72 West College Avenue
San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903
Grantee: RICHARD SALINAS, a married person as his sole and separate property
2107 Greenwood
San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76901
Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration
Property (including any improvements):
Lot 2, Block 2, Pecan Place, being more particularly described in Volume 251, Page 235,
Deed Records of Tom Green, Texas.
Account #21-38600-0002-002-00
Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on June 16, 1993 in
Suit No. TAX90-0083B by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas.
Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for
all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the
terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated February 17, 1997, and recorded in
Volume 570, Page 84, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas.
For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to
execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the
City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantor's right, title, and interest in and
to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantee's heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither
Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Judgment, nor any other person or entity claiming under
them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax-
Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by
common law and the warranties in § 5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically
excluded.
Grantee's rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code,
including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms
of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in
which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was

50. not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date of
the sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose.
Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the market
value specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment.
Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and all
future years.
When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural.
GRANTOR:
The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule
municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for
any taxing authorities named in the Judgment
ATTEST: By: ____________________________
Alvin New, Mayor and
duly-authorized agent
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
STATE OF TEXAS §
§
COUNTY OF TOM GREEN §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2013, by Alvin New,
Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, on
behalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in the
above instrument.
__________________________________
Notary Public, State of Texas
After Recording, Return To:

51. 1916 Shleton St. S 1/2 of Lot 12, Block 3, Home Acres 87' x 250'
March 7, 2013 1:2,699
0 0.0225 0.045 0.09 mi
City Address Points
0 0.035 0.07 0.14 km
Pending City Addresses Copyright:© 2013 ESRI, NAVTEQ, DeLorme
Retired City Addresses
County Address Points

52. PROPERTY ANALYSIS
For Tax Resale Property
Legal Description: The South one-half of Lot 12, Block 3, Home Acres Addition, City of San Angelo,
Tom Green County, Texas, as described in Volume 288, Page 55, Deed Records of
Tom Green County, Texas.
Improved/Unimproved Unimproved
Tax Suit Number: B-00-0043-T
Location: 1916 Shelton
Parcel Size/Dimensions: 87' x 250'
City of San Angelo vs. Eddie May Brown Account #5610 and R.J. Brown Account #8515
Tax ID Number: #15-28100-0003-029-00
Judgment Date: January 6, 2004
Date of Sheriff's Sale: November 1, 2011
Sheriff's Deed Recorded: November 17, 2011
Years Held in Trust 1 YR
Adjudge Value: $ 5,200.00 Purchased under Urban Redevelopment No
Amount of Offer: $ 2,500.00
Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts
Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations Distributed
Administration Fee $500.00 $500.00 0.00% $500.00
Maintenance Fee $ 350.00 0.00% $ -
District Clerk $34.00 $34.00 0.00% $ - $ -
Sheriff's Fee $100.00 $100.00 0.00% $ - $ -
Attorney Fee $208.00 $208.00 0.00% $ - $ -
Municipal Liens $ - $794.06 10.82% $141.50 $141.50
Taxes $ - $6,546.19 89.18% $1,166.50 $1,166.50
Total $1,192.00 $7,340.25 $842.00 100.00% $ 1,308.00 $1,808.00
Actual Total Amt Due $8,532.25
Amount Remaining $ 1,308.00
Offer will satisfy all court costs and a small portion of the taxes and liens.

53. NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove or
strike any or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record in
the public records: your social security number or your driver’s license number.
Tax-Resale Deed
(Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value)
Date: __________________________
Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee
for itself, Tom Green County, and San Angelo Independent School District
72 West College Avenue
San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903
Grantee: MARIA ROSA SANCHEZ, a single person and LILLIANA SANCHEZ, a single person
718 W 19th Street
San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903
Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration
Property (including any improvements):
The South one-half of Lot 12, Block 3, Home Acres Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom
Green County, Texas, as described in Volume 288, Page 55, Deed Records of Tom Green
County, Texas.
Account #15-28100-0003-029-00
Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on January 6, 2004 in
Suit No. B-00-0043-T by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas.
Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for
all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the
terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated November 17, 2011, and recorded in
Instrument 710996, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas.
For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to
execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the
City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantor's right, title, and interest in and
to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantee's heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither
Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Judgment, nor any other person or entity claiming under
them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax-
Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by
common law and the warranties in § 5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically
excluded.
Grantee's rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code,
including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms
of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in
which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was

54. not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date of
the sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose.
Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the market
value specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment.
Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and all
future years.
When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural.
GRANTOR:
The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule
municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for
any taxing authorities named in the Judgment
ATTEST: By: ____________________________
Alvin New, Mayor and
duly-authorized agent
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
STATE OF TEXAS §
§
COUNTY OF TOM GREEN §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2013, by Alvin New,
Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, on
behalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in the
above instrument.
__________________________________
Notary Public, State of Texas
After Recording, Return To:

55. City of San Angelo
Memo
Date: March 6, 2013
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Michael Dane, ACM/CFO
Subject: Agenda Item for March 19, 2013 Council Meeting
Contact: Morgan Trainer, Budget, 325-653-6291
Caption: Consent Agenda
Consideration of adoption of a resolution allowing the City Manager or his
designee to negotiate and execute a contract with the Chamber of Commerce
Convention & Visitors Bureau allocating Hotel Occupancy Tax funds.
Summary: City staff is requesting the City Council consider adopting a resolution allowing
staff to continue negotiating terms of the Chamber of Commerce Convention &
Visitors Bureau contract for use of hotel occupancy tax dollars. Due to San
Angelo’s changing economy and positive hotel occupancy tax experience, it is
prudent to change existing methodology to provide the best value to the citizens
of San Angelo.
History: The City of San Angelo levied the hotel occupancy tax for the operation of
convention facilities, the promotion of tourism, and the improvement of the arts.
Current contracts and ordinances allocate 48% of tax receipts to City of San
Angelo Civic Events, 47% to the Convention & Visitors Bureau, and the
remaining 5% to the San Angelo Cultural Affairs Council. The current tax rate is
7% for the City of San Angelo. The state levies an additional 6%. No change is
proposed to the tax levy.
On February 5, 2013 City Council discussed changing the Hotel Occupancy Tax
allocation process. On March 5, 2013 staff presented a draft contract with the
Chamber of Commerce Convention & Visitors Bureau to revise the way Hotel
Occupancy Tax dollars are disbursed to include clear communication,
performance benchmarks, demonstrate the value added, and allow the City
Council to shape the entity’s activity.
Financial Impact: The current budget for the Convention & Visitors Bureau contract is $693,250. The
proposed contract would allocate $795,000 to the Convention & Visitors Bureau.
Though this would require an increase to the budget of $101,750, this proposed
allocation is less than last year’s transfer of $1,003,034.18. Though a budget
amendment is required, there is ample funding available based on year to date trend
to fund this contract with hotel occupancy tax.
Related Vision Item Financial Vision
(if applicable):
Other Information/ Staff recommends approval of the resolution
Recommendation:
Attachments: Proposed Convention & Visitors Bureau contract and Resolution
Presentation: None

56. Publication: None
Reviewed by Michael Dane, Finance, 3/6/2013
Director:
Approved by Legal: Pending

62. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A CONTRACT
WITH THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CONVENTION & VISITORS
BUREAU ALLOCATING HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUNDS
WHEREAS, the State of Texas allows local governments to levy a hotel occupancy tax to
enhance and promote tourism, to construct and maintain convention center facilities, to
encourage the arts, for historical restoration, and for expenses for sporting events; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo has levied such a tax at the rate of 7% for the operation of
convention facilities, the promotion of tourism, and the improvement of the arts; and
WHEREAS, the Chamber of Commerce Convention & Visitors Bureau is the City’s agent to
promote tourism; and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN ANGELO that its City Manager Daniel Valenzuela or his designee is hereby authorized to
negotiate and execute a contract with the Chamber of Commerce Convention & Visitors Bureau
allocating hotel occupancy tax funds:
APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF , 2013.
THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO
_______________________________
Alvin New, Mayor
Attest:
______________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
Approved As to Content: Approved As to Form:
______________________________ ______________________________
Michael Dane, Assistant City Manager/CFO Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

63. Exhibit "A"
CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU 2013 BUDGET
INCOME:
Hotel/Motel Tax Receipts 795,000.00
Interest Income 350.00
Other Income/Visitor Center Sales 8,000.00
Community Events 0.00
Travel Cookbooks Income 0.00
TOTAL INCOME $803,350.00
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Extra Help/Part Time 17,500.00
Administrative Salaries 197,887.00
Social Security 11,800.00
Bookkeeping/Administration 17,000.00
Medicare 2,700.00
Employee Retirement 10,600.00
Unemployment Comp 600.00
Group Insurance 29,150.00
Audit/Legal 2,600.00
Facility Agreement 6,000.00
Rent/Storage Bldg. 1,000.00
Equipment Expense 18,000.00
Insurance 4,680.00
Postage 2,400.00
Telephone 7,000.00
Office Supplies 6,500.00
Automobile 19,000.00
Miscellaneous Office Support 2,000.00
Maintenance 11,600.00
Security 2,000.00
Utilities 14,000.00
Computers/Database Support 5,000.00
Christmas Lights Expense 1,750.00
Cornerstone Expense 200.00
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 390,967.00

64. MARKETING/ADVERTISING
Professional Dues 7,000.00
Pro Training/Conferences 4,500.00
Subscriptions 5,000.00
Advertising/publicity 185,000.00
Volunteer Programs 2,400.00
Public Relations 5,000.00
Convention Servicing/Supplies 27,000.00
Promotional Items 11,500.00
Visitors & Travel Marketing 29,575.00
Convention & Travel Trade 48,000.00
Postage/marketing 3,500.00
800 Number (telephone) 400.00
Trade Shows 23,000.00
Visitor Center Merchandise 6,000.00
Brochure Development/Printing 12,000.00
Visitor Event Incentive 40,000.00
CVB Website 2,500.00
TOTAL MARKETING/ADV 412,375.00
TOTAL EXPENSES 803,342.00
SURPLUS (DEFICIT) 8.00

65. City of San Angelo
Office of the City Clerk
Memo
Date: March 8, 2013
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
Subject: Agenda Item for March 20, 2012 Council Meeting
Contact: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk, 657-4405
Caption: Consent Item
Consideration of adopting a Resolution appointing election officials for the election to be held on
May 11, 2013; and providing for an effective date
Summary: The Resolution appointing election officials, judges and alternates for the
General/Special Election is a routine action required by the Election Code. In the majority of the
polling places, both the judges and alternates have previously served for City elections. In all
polling places, either the judge or alternate has experience in serving for elections. In addition,
State Law requires the presiding judge of an election precinct to make reasonable efforts to
appoint a sufficient number of election clerks who are fluent in both English and Spanish to serve
the needs of the Spanish-speaking voters of the precinct, if five percent (5%) or more of the
inhabitants are persons of Spanish origin or descent. Most precincts will include two (2) election
clerks. In accordance with the Election Services Contract with the Tom Green County Elections
Administrator previously approved by the Council, the list of judges and alternates is provided by
the Elections Administrator and is responsible for ensuring reasonable efforts to serve Spanish-
speaking voters.
Financial Impact: The expense of the Election is shared on a pro rata basis with the Independent School
Districts in San Angelo, Grape Creek, Wall, and Veribest. The estimated total cost for a city-wide
election at $30,000.00 to $40,000.00 and we are anticipating a Runoff Election for June 15, 2013..
Other Information/Recommendation: On the final two days of early voting by personal appearance, the
Election Administrator’s office and branch location hours will be designated from 7:00 a.m. until 7:00
p.m., beginning on May 6 and ending May 7, 2013.
Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution. The Resolution designating the polling locations and
Contract for joint election services was authorized in December 6, 2011.
Attachments: Resolution appointing Election Judges

66. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, APPOINTING ELECTION
OFFICIALS FOR THE ELECTION TO BE HELD ON
MAY 11, 2013; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE
WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo adopted Ordinance #2013-02-??? calling for the
General Election on May 11, 2013; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo adopted Resolution #2013-03-??? designating
polling places within the election precincts within the City of San Angelo, Texas for elections
ordered; and
WHEREAS, the Texas Election Code Section 32.005 authorizes the City Council to
appoint election judges for the designated polling places, within the election precincts within
the City of San Angelo, Texas for elections ordered by the City; and
WHEREAS, by this Resolution, it is the intention of the City Council to appoint
election officials and judges to each early voting and election day polling place within the
designated election precinct; and
WHEREAS, the Election Services Contract with the Tom Green County
Elections Administrator provides that the Administrator arrange for the use of the polling
places and furnish a list of judges and Alternateernates for each polling place;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
SECTION 1: FINDINGS INCORPORATED. The findings set forth above are
incorporated into the body of this Resolution as if fully set forth herein.
SECTION 2: DESIGNATION OF ELECTION JUDGES AND
ALTERNATEERNATES FOR THE CITY’S ELECTION PRECINCTS FOR THE GENERAL
ELECTION TO HELD ON MAY 11, 2013: The election judges and Alternateernates
assigned to the designated election precincts within the City, as set forth in Exhibit "A",
attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes.
SECTION 3: FURTHER DESIGNATION: The City further authorizes the City Clerk
to appoint substitute election judges in the event the individuals appointed herein are
unable to fulfill their duties.
SECTION 4: NECESSARY ACTIONS: The Mayor and the City Clerk, in consultation
with the City Attorney, are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all actions
necessary to comply with the provisions of the Code, the Texas Election Code and any
other state or federal law in carrying out and designating polling placing, whether or not
expressly authorized herein and all actions previously taken are hereby ratified.

67. SECTION 5: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its passage.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 19th day of March, 2013.
THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS
___________________________
Alvin New, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
Approved As to Content: Approved As to Form:
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

68. Exhibit “A”
DESIGNATION OF ELECTION JUDGES AND ALTERNATEERNATE JUDGES
FOR DESIGNATED POLLING PLACES FOR MAY 11, 2013 GENERAL/SPECIAL ELECTION
ELECTION DAY POLLING LOCATIONS OPEN FROM 7:00 A.M. TO 7:00 P.M.
Election Day Dia de las Elecciones
May 11, 2013, 7 am to 7 pm El 11 de mayo, 2013, desde las 7 hasta las 7
Voters in precincts 114, 137, and 144 vote at Belmore Baptist Church-Fellowship Hall, 1214 S. Bell St.
Votantes en precintos 114, 137, y 144, votar en Belmore Baptist Church-Fellowship Hall, 1214 South Bell
ELECTION JUDGE: David McMahon, Judge and Nelda Englert, Alternate Judge
Voters in precincts 106, 107, 127, and 146 vote at Baptist Memorial Hospital, 902 N. Main, Chapel
Votantes en precintos 106, 107, 124, y 146 votan en la capilla de Baptist Memorial Hospital, 902 Main al Norte.
ELECTION JUDGE: Mark Gregory, Judge and Maggie Fernandez, Alternateernate Judge
Voters in precinct 108 vote at Harriett Baptist Church, 7626 N US Hwy 67
Votantes en precinto 108 votan en Harriett Baptist Church, 7626 N US Hwy 67
ELECTION JUDGE: Noemi Hoelscher, Judge and Cruz Carol, Alternateernate Judge
Voters in precincts 112 and 213 vote at St Ambrose Church, 8602 Loop 570, Wall, TX.
Votantes en precintos 112 y 213 votan en St. Ambrose Church, 8602 Loop 570, Wall, TX.
ELECTION JUDGE: Lloyd Moore, Judge and Charlene Dusek, Alternateernate Judge
Voters in precincts 228, and 230 vote at Southgate Church of Christ, 528 Country Club Rd.
Votantes dentro precintos 228, y 230 votan en Southgate Church of Christ, 528 Country Club Road.
ELECTION JUDGE: Sid Clemmer, Judge and Carol Cahill, Alternateernate Judge
Voters in precincts 215 and 241 vote at Texas Department of Transportation, 4502 Knickerbocker Rd., Bldg. E
Votantes en precintos 215 y 241 votan en el Departamento de Transporte de Texas, 4502 Knickerbocker Road,
Edificio "E".
ELECTION JUDGE: Charlie Hafer, Judge and Sue Bramhall, Alternate Judge
Voters in precincts 304, 306, and 348 vote at Lakeview Bible Church, 4825 Grape Creek Rd.
Votantes en precintos 304, 306, y 348 votan en Lakeview Bible Church, 4825 Grape Creek Road
ELECTION JUDGE: Gloria Mata, Judge and Aurora Rodriguez , Alternate Judge
Voters in precincts 305, 308, 319, 327, and 351 vote at Ángelo Bible Church, 3506 Sherwood Way.
Votantes en precintos 305, 308, 319, 327, y 351 votan en Ángelo Bible Church, 3506 Sherwood Way.
ELECTION JUDGE: Sandi Smith, Judge and Charlene Corfield , Alternate Judge
Voters in precinct 358 vote at Grape Creek ISD Admin. Building, 8207 US Hwy. 87 N.
Votantes en precinto 358 votan en el DEI de Grape Creek en el edificio de Administración, 8207 US HWY 87,
Norte.
ELECTION JUDGE: Betty Lacy, Judge and Gena Franks, Alternate Judge
Voters in precincts 402, 420, 421, and 424 vote at Plaza del Sol Apartments, 4359 Oak Grove Blvd.
Votantes en precintos 402, 420, 421, y 424 votan en Plaza del Sol Apartments, 4359 Oak Grove Boulevard
ELECTION JUDGE: John Graham, Judge and Mitch Krasny, Alternate Judge
Voters in precincts 401, 434, 435, and 436 vote at MHMR Services, 1501 W. Beauregard Ave.
Votantes en precintos 401, 434. 435 y 436 votan en Servicios de MHMR 1501 Beauregard, Oeste.
ELECTION JUDGE: Ivey Mossell, Judge and Jim Jones, Alternate Judge
Voters in precinct 423 vote at Knickerbocker Community Center, 14608 FM 2335, Knickerbocker, TX.
Votantes en precinto 423 votan en Knickerbocker Community Center, 14608 FM 2335, Knickerbocker, TX.
ELECTION JUDGE: Mary Page, Judge and Silvia Montalvo, Alternate Judge

69. Early Voting by personal appearance and mail, 113 W. Beauregard
Vona McKerley, Early Voting Clerk
Alicia Ramirez, Deputy Early Voting Clerk
Rudy Olivas, Deputy Early Voting Clerk
Vanessa Simon, Deputy Early Voting Clerk
Early Voting Ballot Board, 113 W. Beauregard
Katherine Osborne, Chairperson
CLERKS: Lenda Campbell, Stella Hodges, Connie DelaRosa, Anita Betty,
Linda Martin, and Charlene Schmidt
Central Counting Station and Manual Count, 113 W. Beauregard
Alicia Ramirez, Presiding Judge
Vona McKerley, Manager
Rudy Olivas, Technical Supervisor
CLERKS: John Stone, Barbara Stone, Kevin Burke, Gwenn Neill, Mike
Granados, and Stephen Radloff
TECHNICAL CLERKS: John Stone and Barbara Stone
Tom Green County Sherriff, Security
DOCK: Bob Boyles and Danny List
Precinct Records and Voted Ballots Storage, 113 W. Beauregard
Vona McKerley, Agent to General Custodian
Alicia Ramirez, General Custodian of Special Election Records

70. City of San Angelo
Memo
Date:
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Carl White, Parks & Recreation Director
Subject: Agenda Item for March 19, 2013 Council Meeting
Contact: Carl White, 325-234-1724
Caption: Consent Item
Consideration of approving an Interlocal Cooperative Agreement with the San
Angelo Independent School District for the construction of improvements at the
Bradford Elementary School Park and authorizing the Mayor or City Manager to
execute the agreement.
Summary: This agreement will authorize the construction of park amenities on the Bradford
th
School property (vicinity 24 and Poe Streets in Northeast San Angelo) and
document the relationship between the City and SAISD regarding this project and
the availability of the improvements to the public as well as maintenance
responsibilities.
History: There is no history on this item. Funds are available for park improvements and
Council has directed staff to cooperate with SAISD to provide park amenities,
where possible, on school property such that they can be used by the public and
maintained by SAISD.
Financial Impact: The cost of the project is $175,000.00 from half-cent sales tax funds dedicated to
Park Improvements.
Related Vision Item Neighborhood Vision – provide adequate amenities for all neighborhoods.
(if applicable):
Other Information/ Staff recommends approval.
Recommendation:
Attachments: Proposed agreement and Resolution
Presentation: N/A
Publication: N/A
Reviewed by Rick Weise, Assistant City Manager
Director:
Approved by Legal: Yes
Adopted: 5/30/03
Revised: 6/21/10

80. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO
EXECUTE AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT
WITH THE SAN ANGELO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
(SAISD) PROVIDING FOR CONSTRUCTION BY THE CITY OF
RECREATIONAL AND PARK IMPROVEMENTS, NOT TO
EXCEED $175,000.00, FOR PUBLIC USE ON PROPERTY OWNED
BY THE SAISD GENERALLY KNOWN AS BRADFORD
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE SAISD
WHEREAS, the City Council determines that it is in the interest of the citizens of
the City of San Angelo for the City to cooperate with the San Angelo Independent School
District (SAISD) for the joint use of resources to mutually provide park amenities open to
the public ; and,
WHEREAS, the Bradford Elementary School is located on N. Poe Street, between
E. 22nd Street and E. 24th Street, and includes vacant land suitable for recreational and
park amenities for public use; and,
WHEREAS, the SAISD is agreeable to maintain park facilities proposed to be
constructed on school district property by the City for public use under terms of an
interlocal agreement, for a term of twenty-five years with option to renew for an
additional twenty-five years, which use would be beneficial for the citizens of the City of
San Angelo;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS THAT:
The City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to execute an Interlocal
Cooperation Agreement on behalf of the City of San Angelo with the San Angelo
Independent School District effective for a term of twenty-five years with an option to
renew for an additional twenty-five years, pursuant to which the City of San Angelo shall
construct recreational and park improvements on certain property owned by the SAISD
known as Bradford Elementary School, in a sum not to exceed One Hundred Seventy-
Five Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($175,000.00), for public use by the Citizens of San
Angelo..
PASSED and APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2013.
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS
ATTEST:
Alvin New, Mayor
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

81. APPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORM
Carl White, Parks & Recreation Director Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

82. City of San Angelo
Memo
Date:
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney
Subject: Agenda Item for March 19, 2013 Council Meeting
Contact: Assistant City Manager Rick Weise, 657-4241
Caption: Consent Item
Consideration of A Resolution by the City Council of the City of San Angelo,
Texas, authorizing the City Manager to execute a First Amended Lease
Agreement amending the original lease agreement between City of San Angelo
and Howard County Junior College District, including extending the original lease
term and providing for additional improvements to be made on leased premises.
Summary/History: Since January of 2001, Howard County Junior College District and the City of San
Angelo have operated a highly successful vocational training program commonly
referred to as the West Texas Training Center (WTTC) located at the Howard
College San Angelo Campus facility.
Due to its success, the Howard College San Angelo Campus facility has reached
maximum enrollment and additional facilities are needed to better serve the
citizens of San Angelo and surrounding areas. The identified needs are both
vocational and academic programs and the expanded services will begin
immediately upon construction. Preexisting educational services will continue
without interruption.
For this reason, Howard County Junior College District requests the City of San
Angelo approve the attached amendment to the original lease between the parties
which provides for a fifty five (55) year lease term from the inception of the original
lease term of September 1, 2008 and for one (1) renewal term of twenty five (25)
years. This amended lease term will allow Howard County Junior College District
to construct and maintain additional vocational and educational facilities for the
benefit of the Howard College San Angelo campus and the San Angelo
community as a whole. The improvements will be financed by revenue bonds to
be repaid by student tuition and other fees. All costs of construction and
maintenance will be assumed by Howard County Junior College District for the
period of the lease. After the term of the lease and any renewal term expire,
ownership of the facilities will transfer to City of San Angelo. The proposed
facilities and improvements have been designed by the architectural firm of
Parkhill Smith and Cooper Inc. employing the construction management at risk
procurement and delivery method.
Financial Impact: Lessee bears cost for performance and obligations.
Related Vision Item None.
(if applicable):
Other Information/ Staff recommends the City Manager to execute the lease agreement.
Recommendation:

83. Attachments: Resolution
Lease Agreement
Presentation: None.
Publication: None.
Reviewed by None.
Director:
Approved by Legal: City Attorney Lysia H. Bowling, 3/12/13

108. A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO,
TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A FIRST
AMENDED LEASE AGREEMENT AMENDING THE ORIGINAL LEASE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF SAN ANGELO AND HOWARD COUNTY
JUNIOR COLLEGE DISTRICT, INCLUDING EXTENDING THE ORIGINAL
LEASE TERM AND PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS TO
BE MADE ON LEASED PREMISES.
WHEREAS, City and Howard County Junior College District entered into Lease Agreement ("Lease
Agreement") on August 19, 2008 for lease of 20.087 acres of land, to include the West Texas Training
Center located at 3501 N. US HWY 67, San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, for the operation and
maintenance of a technical training center for public education purposes;
WHEREAS, City and Lessee now desire to amend Lease Agreement and enter into First
Amended Lease Agreement to change certain provisions of Lease Agreement, including extending the
original lease term and providing for additional improvements to be made on leased premises;
WHEREAS, all of the terms and conditions of the original Lease Agreement shall be and remain
in full force and effect unless amended or changed by the First Amended Lease Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAN
ANGELO, TEXAS THAT:
The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the First Amended Lease Agreement on behalf of the
City of San Angelo and Howard County Junior College District amending the original Lease Agreement between
the parties dated August 19, 2008.
PASSED and APPROVED THIS _ _ _ _ _ DAY OF _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.~:, 2013.
ATTEST: CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Alvin New, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORM
Rick Weise, Assistant City Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

133. City of San Angelo
Memo
Date: December 14, 2012
To: Mayor and Council members
From: City Attorney Lysia H. Bowling
Subject: Agenda Item for March 19, 2013
Contact: Office of the City Attorney, 657-4405
Caption: Consent Agenda
Consideration of the adoption of a resolution endorsing certain legislative action in
rd
the Regular Session of the 83 Legislature to enhance the competitive electric
market and system reliability and to protect the traditional role of cities in the
regulatory process..
Summary: The City of San Angelo is a member of the Texas Coalition for Affordable Power
(TCAP). More than 160 cities and political subdivisions make up TCAP, which is
one of the largest organizations of energy consumers in the State of Texas.
TCAP, as part of its mission, monitors federal, state and local initiatives that may
affect the price and availability of energy, and proactively promotes affordable
energy policies which can impact municipal budgets and the ability to fund
essential services
History: Historically, cities have formed coalitions to represent their collective interests
before utility rate regulatory agencies and courts. By forming coalitions, cities
have been able to present a strong voice for consumers for over thirty years. This
has served to reduce costs that cities and their residents pay for electric and gas
utility services. In numerous instances, without the participation of coalitions of
cities, rate increases would have gone into effect without any party scrutinizing the
utility’s application for rate increase. Participation in the coalition and adoption of
the resolution endorsing legislative action to enhance the competitive electric
market will demonstrate the mutual concern of the City of San Angelo with other
city members of TCAP for reliability, quality of service, and price of electric utilities.
Financial Impact: The City of San Angelo is a member of TCAP. Support of the efforts of the coalition
may result in maintaining favorable legislation accommodating the participation of
Texas cities in the process for consideration of future utility applications for rate
increases.
Related Vision Item N/A
(if applicable):
Other Information/ N/A
Recommendation: Staff recommends adoption of the resolution.

134. Attachments: The proposed resolution is attached.
Presentation: N/A
Publication: N/A
Reviewed by City Attorney Lysia H. Bowling
Director:
Approved by Legal: 3/12/13

135. RESOLUTION NO. ____________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, ENDORSING
CERTAIN LEGISLATIVE ACTION IN THE REGULAR SESSION OF THE 83RD
TEXAS LEGISLATURE TO ENHANCE THE COMPETITIVE ELECTRIC
MARKET AND SYSTEM RELIABILITY AND TO PROTECT THE
TRADITIONAL ROLE OF CITIES IN THE REGULATORY PROCESS
WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo, Texas is a member of Texas Coalition for Affordable
Power (“TCAP”), a non-profit political subdivision created by cities throughout Texas to secure
affordable electric energy for its members in the deregulated electric market; and
WHEREAS, TCAP pools the energy needs of its more than 160 political subdivision
members to negotiate favorable prices and contract terms for the purchase of approximately 1.3
billion kilowatt hours annually; and
WHEREAS, affordable and reliable power means economic development for the City and a
better standard of living for our citizens; and
WHEREAS, the City supports legislative initiatives that promote a healthy electric market
where competition can flourish and electric customers can save money; and
WHEREAS, the City endorses the legislative agenda of TCAP and opposes legislative
initiatives that would fundamentally alter the ERCOT energy market or the traditional role of cities in
the regulatory process.
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO,
TEXAS, THAT:
1. The Regular Session of the 83rd Texas Legislature be encouraged to preserve the
traditional role of cities in the regulatory process, including original jurisdiction and reimbursement
of reasonable rate case expenses.
2. The Legislature make no statutory changes that would lead to a reduction in revenues
paid by public utilities as franchise fees for rental of public rights-of-way.
3. The Legislature facilitate and encourage public/private partnerships between cities
and electric generation developers in creating small-scale (not to exceed 50 MW) power plants
capable of rapidly meeting peak power needs.
4. The Legislature recognize that “smart meters” are under-utilized with regard to
encouraging and incentivizing reductions in energy consumption during peak periods and that the
regulated transmission and distribution utilities which own the “smart meters” be allowed to re-enter
the retail electric market to the extent they offer regulated rate plans designed to incent reductions in
peak energy consumption.
5. The Legislature preclude foreign ownership of electric distribution assets and make it
clear that, notwithstanding any other provision in law, home rule cities, individually or collectively,
shall be permitted to own and operate electric distribution assets so long as said cities are not
involved in retail sales of electricity.

136. 6. The Legislature resist any efforts to transform the energy-only ERCOT market into a
capacity market which would increase the price of electricity by artificially inflating generator
profits.
7. The Legislature enhance protections against anti-competitive activities in the
wholesale market and require the Public Utility Commission (“PUC”) to reform its rules related to
Voluntary Mitigation Plans and allow cities and other interested parties to participate in review of
such plans.
8. The Legislature mandate that the PUC and market participants provide consumer
education regarding the relationship between time of use, cost of energy production and transmission,
and the price paid by consumers.
9. The Legislature require the PUC to establish certain uniform products that must be
offered by all retail electric providers (“REPs”) and to establish new rules governing the
powertochoose.org and powertosavetexas.org websites that will better inform retail customers of
complaints against REPs and better educate customers regarding the economic and market benefits of
reducing demand during peak periods.
10. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage.
11. A copy of this resolution shall be sent to the elected lawmakers representing the
City’s interests in the Texas House and Senate and to Randolph C. Moravec, Executive Director of
TCAP, 15455 Dallas Parkway, Addison, Texas 75001.
PRESENTED AND PASSED on this ______ day of ____________, 2013 by a vote of ____ ayes
and ____ nays at a regular meeting of the City Council of San Angelo, Texas.
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS
____________________________________
Alvin New, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________
Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

137. The Texas Coalition for Affordable Power
Recommendations for a More
Competitive Electric Market
Because high energy costs can impact municipal
budgets and the ability to fund essential services, TCAP,
as part of its mission, actively promotes affordable energy
policies. Affordable power in a fully competitive market
also means economic development for our communities
and a better life for our citizens. TCAP members are
committed to making electric deregulation work.
Maintaining an even playing field for cities
Cities have a long history representing consumers in “regulated” rate cases. But big electric companies
want to deter cities from exercising any opposition so they can more easily raise rates. TCAP will work
hard at the Texas Legislature to protect city authority.
Fair Price for Electricity Produced at Home
Are rooftop solar panels installed in your community? TCAP supports legislation that will ensure that
residential and small commercial customers that produce excess power at their homes or businesses
receive a fair price for power they provide the grid.
Reduce Confusion in the Retail Electricity Market
Texans should have access to standard-language electricity deals. These deals will enhance competition
by facilitating apples-to-apples price shopping.
Contact: Randolph (Randy) C. Moravec, PhD, Executive Director
rcmoravec@tcaptx.com • (972) 742-7015

138. Avoid Changes in the Market that Will Increase Costs
Some of the state’s generation companies want to receive big payments for power plants, regardless
of whether any power is actually generated — and are lobbying hard for changes to make it happen.
TCAP will oppose proposals at the Legislature that create unnecessary price supports for generators that
circumvent the competitive market and increase electricity costs to consumers.
Updating Market Protections in the Lone Star State
Where appropriate, anti-competitive behavior prohibited in other states should also be prohibited in
Texas. Texas regulators should have the same power to assess penalties as regulators elsewhere. Legal
loopholes that exempt some generators from prosecution should be closed.
Promote Public-Private Electric Generation Partnerships
TCAP wants cities to have the right to pursue small-scale generation projects, just so long as the projects
enhance economic development and produce affordable power. Such public-private partnerships also
are a cost-effective way to help address the state’s long-term generation and reliability challenges.
No foreign ownership of electric distribution facilities
Texans depend on a complex network of wires to bring power to their homes. With so much at stake,
accountability is important. That’s why there should be no foreign ownership of local electric distribution
networks. When the system fails or bills go up, Texans shouldn’t have to call Madrid to complain.
Home rule cities — individually or collectively —also should be permitted to own and operate electric
distribution networks.
Hold Big Generation Companies Accountable for Market Abuses
Under Texas law, big generation companies can obtain advanced regulatory protections against future
prosecution for anti-competitive behavior. TCAP supports reforms to ensure that these advanced
protections are fair, and don’t become “Get Out Of Jail Free” cards for market abusers.
Contact: Randolph (Randy) C. Moravec, PhD, Executive Director
rcmoravec@tcaptx.com • (972) 742-7015

139. National Nutrition Month® 2013
Proclamation
(State or City) OF
EXECUTIVE OFFICE
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS food is the substance by which life is sustained; and
WHEREAS the type, quality, and amount of food that individuals consume each day plays a
vital role in their overall health and physical fitness; and
WHEREAS there is a need for continuing nutrition education and a wide-scale effort to
enhance healthy eating practices;
NOW, THEREFORE I, _________________(Name), __________________(Title)
_________________________________________________________, (City/State)
DO HEREBY PROCLAIM the month of March NATIONAL NUTRITION MONTH® in
(City/State)_______________, and I encourage all citizens to join the campaign
and become concerned about their nutrition and the nutrition of others in the hope of
achieving optimum health for both today and tomorrow.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the
_____________________________________________________________________
to be affixed.
Done at the ____________on this the ________day of ________________________,
Two thousand and thirteen.
By:
Title:
Attest:
Title:

140. PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, For over 150 years, Lutheran Schools have provided communities,
states, and the country with Christian leaders in business, politics,
military, ministry, education, and other fields; and
WHEREAS, National Lutheran Schools Month is also an occasion for schools
to interest citizens in volunteering their time and talents to local
Lutheran Schools; and
WHEREAS, Lutheran Schools have provided a quality Christian education
program that has inspired students to serve others through civic
engagement and provided students with opportunities to serve
while equipping them with the tools they need to fulfill their future
roles as good citizens, productive employees, and compassionate
leaders; and
WHEREAS, Locally we are joining with Trinity Lutheran School as they
celebrate almost 63 years of service to our Community;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Alvin New, Mayor of the City of San Angelo, Texas, on behalf
of the City Council, do hereby proclaim March, 2013 as
“NATIONAL LUTHERAN SCHOOLS MONTH”
and encourage everyone to pay tribute to the dedication and service of Trinity
Lutheran School for their many years of commitment to the community of San Angelo.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
set my hand and caused the Seal of the City to
be affixed this 19th day of March, 2013.
THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO
ALVIN NEW, MAYOR

141. City of San Angelo
Memo
Meeting Date: March 5, 2013
To: City Council members
From: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner
Subject: PD 13-01 West Company/Granger Macdonald, A request for
approval of a zone change from a combination of Single-Family
Residential (RS-1) and General Commercial (CG) to Planned
Development (PD) to specifically allow for multi-family living and a
lease house /amenity center on the following property:
Location: an unaddressed 9.8 acre property, located directly west of the
intersection of Northwest Drive and Green Hill Road. The property
specifically occupies a proposed Second Replat of Arden Acres,
Section Three, Block 3, Tract 3 in western San Angelo.
Purpose: Approval of this request will change the zoning designation on the
property and allow the construction of multi-family dwelling units.
Contacts: Andrew Mellen, West Company 432-682-0588
Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner 325-657-4210
Caption: First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance
amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of
Ordinances, City of San Angelo
PD 13-01: West Company/Granger Macdonald
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE
CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH
SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING
REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN
ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING
THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING
PROPERTY, TO WIT: an unaddressed 9.8 acre property out of
approximately 75 acres currently described as Section 3, Arden
Acres, which is located adjacent to and directly west of the

142. intersection of Northwest Drive and Green Hill Road. The
property specifically occupies a proposed Second Replat of
Arden Acres, Section Three, Block 3, Tract 3 in western San
Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a combination of
Single-Family Residential (RS-1) and General Commercial (CG) to
Planned Development (PD) District; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
Summary: The City Council may:
(1) Approve the proposed zone change;
(2) Remand the application back to Planning Commission for further discussion, in
which case another public hearing will need to be scheduled; or
(3) Approve subject to modification OR acceptance of proposed conditions; or
(4) Deny the proposed zone change
Recommendation: Planning staff recommends approving the proposed zone
change, subject to the Conditions listed in Conditions 5-14 of the attached draft
ordinance.
Planning Commission recommended approval of this request by a 5-0 vote on February
18, 2013.
History and Background:
General Information
Existing Zoning: Single-Family Residential (RS-1) and General
Commercial (CG)
Existing Land Use: undeveloped, vacant property
Surrounding Zoning/Land Use:
North: CH Undeveloped open property
West: CG & RS-1 Undeveloped property & ball fields
South: RS-1 Red Arroyo, vacant land
East: CG Vacant property & retail establishments
2

143. Thoroughfares/Streets: Northwest Drive is defined as a collector street in
this area and is designed to collect local street
traffic carrying it to arterial streets at a moderate
speed.
Green Hill Road is defined as a local street and is
designed to carries light neighborhood traffic at
lower speeds and generally connects to collector
streets.
Zoning History: No previous zoning history on this property. The
general area was annexed into the City Limits in
November of 1997
Development Standards: All required off-street parking and the
connection(s) to a public right-of-way are required
to be paved.
Construction of more than one principal building
for multi-family use on a lot requires an Urban
Design Review to be completed and approved
before construction may take place.
Other applicable development standards are
included in the draft ordinance at the end of this
report.
Vision Plan Map: Commercial
Comp Plan Excerpts: Goal Three from the Neighborhood Section of the
2009 Comprehensive Plan states that (the city
should), "Improve relationship between adjacent
commercial and residential land use adjacencies."
One action step of this goal states that (the city
should), " Require a buffer separating commercial,
industrial, or agricultural zoned lands from
neighborhoods. This buffer may be an intermediate
“mixed-use” zone, a landscape buffer, or public right-
of-way.
Goal One from the Commercial Section of the
2009 Comprehensive Plan states that (the city
should), "Establish transition areas between
commercial areas and nearby neighborhoods."
3

144. Special Information
Traffic Concerns: Changing the zoning from residential and
commercial to Planned Development with the
allowance for a multi-family living facility will
certainly generate additional traffic than if the
property remained as is. Northwest Drive has
immediate access to the Houston Harte
Expressway and Arden Road; both of these
roadways are designed to carry traffic at higher
speeds with limited access.
Parking Requirements: See Section 11 of the attached draft ordinance.
Parking Provided: No off-street parking is currently provided.
Density: No development is currently open space is
currently present in this area
Notification Required: Yes
Notifications Sent: 1
Responses in Favor: 0
Responses in Opposition: 0
Analysis:
In order to approve this zone change request, the City Council members are first required
to consider the following criteria:
1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible
with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies adopted by the Planning
Commission or City Council.
2. Consistent with Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment would conflict with any portion of this Zoning Ordinance.
3. Compatible with Surrounding Area. Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject land
and is the appropriate zoning district for the land.
4. Changed Conditions. Whether and the extent to which there are changed conditions
that require an amendment.
4

145. 5. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment,
including but not limited to water and air quality, noise, storm water management,
wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the practical functioning of the natural environment.
6. Community Need. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment
addresses a demonstrated community need.
7. Development Patterns. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment
would result in a logical and orderly pattern of urban development in the community.
The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below.
Staff finds this request to be consistent and compatible with the plans and policies
adopted by the community for this particular area. When examining the comprehensive
Plan as a whole, the intent is to transition from more intense zoning classifications
slowly into neighborhoods. In examining this particular request, staff believes a multi-
family complex will serve as this transition in this area. The areas along Houston Harte
are intended for higher trafficked and more intense commercial uses. In examining this
particular area, there is neighborhood development called for to the west. Staff believes
this request is consistent with the goals of the community's comprehensive plan and this
particular development will serve as a gentle transition into the neighborhood areas.
Given the current zoning of the property, a much higher intensity usage would be
allowed and also be a much less suitable into the neighborhood areas identified within
the vision plan.
It is the belief of staff that a Planned Development for this particular property will
generally be consistent with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance. The introduction of a
multi-family dwelling unit development in this area is compatible with the surrounding
area. The street network's capability in this area and isolated location make this an area
where staff believes a multi-family dwelling will be successful. This higher intensity,
residential development will not generate the traffic that a retail establishment has the
potential to, but at the same time the number of visitors to and from the site will be more
like a traditional neighborhood, but a more compact scale. Staff is confident this
Planned Development will serve as a buffer from the higher intensity commercial uses
that may occur along northwest to the envisioned neighborhood development areas to
the west. The Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan seek to create these
transition areas between land uses and in turn help to create orderly predictable
development in this area. This proposal will not alter development patterns in this area,
in fact this development may serve as a catalyst for infill development in this area,
something that is also encouraged within the Comprehensive Plan.
5

146. The intent of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance is to create transitional
zones between commercial zoning and residential zoning within the community. Multi-
family developments tend to be a bit of a hybrid regarding the actual land use. These
types of developments are residential in nature and use, but depending upon the size,
can generate traffic at a higher rate than a lower density neighborhood can. While
apartments can be part of a successful neighborhood (one which offers a wide variety of
housing options), staff believes this Planned Development and the intensity it is seeking
to create on the property will be consistent with the goals and intent of the
Comprehensive Plan for this area. As such, no vision Comprehensive Plan amendment
will be required to approve this request.
This proposal will certainly have an effect on the natural environment in this area as the
land is currently undeveloped and in its natural state. The proximity to the Red Arroyo
and the sheer size of this development will require some storm water mitigation through
the platting process. The applicant is aware of the effect this development will have on
the area and it is the understanding of staff that there are plans being worked on to
account for this effect on the environment in this area. The development is located
nearby other businesses at this time, but given the size of the parcels in this area will be
somewhat isolated when it is completed. Given the development patterns of the area
and isolation from other properties, staff believes that neighboring properties will see
little to no detrimental effects from this proposed development.
The community is certainly growing and a need for more housing and housing choices
certainly comes along with the anticipated growth. Staff believes this area has a great
potential for infill development or both commercial and residential opportunities. A multi-
family development will serve as a transition between zoning districts and will help to
ensure consistent development patterns in this area. This region of town has some
commercial uses and lower density residential zoning and development in place
currently. This mix of housing choices in the region will help to solidify the development
patterns and be highly consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan in staff's
opinion. The commercial zoning present along Houston Harte and Arden Road will need
a population base to develop successfully in staff's opinion. Allowing for a multi-family
development in this area would add population that can utilize the existing businesses,
and also has the potential to create demand for new businesses. This relationship
between commercial and residential properties in this area can be promoted and
protected further by introducing this Planned Development District to serve as a
transition and a compliment to current and future development for the area.
The draft ordinance accompanying this report is designed in a manner that ensures that
the plans and renderings submitted will occur on this property. Due to the nature of the
Planned Development, any deviations in design or layout of the site would require
rehearing. Staff believes a project of this size and scale in this area, the design and site
layout are essential. The site plan allows for circulation inside and outside the site in a
logical, orderly pattern; in addition the renderings of the buildings and proposed
6

147. materials are aesthetically pleasing and will be a compliment to the area in staff's
opinion.
Proposed Conditions
Conditions of the Planned Development are listed in the draft ordinance at the end of
this report in sections 5 through 14.
Attachments: excerpt from zoning map, showing the general location within
the City of San Angelo;
excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property;
aerial photo, highlighting subject property;
excerpt from the comprehensive plan vision map highlighting
the subject property;
draft minute excerpt from the February 18, 2013 Planning
Commission meeting;
draft ordinance with site plan; and
large scale site plan.
Presentation: AJ Fawver, AICP Interim Director of Development Services
7

149. 9

150. 10

151. 11

152. B. PD 13-01: West Company/ Granger Macdonald
A request for approval of a zone change from a combination of Single-Family
Residential (RS-1) and General Commercial (CG) to Planned Development (PD)
to specifically allow for multi-family living and a lease house /amenity center on
the following property:
an unaddressed 9.8 acre property out of approximately 75 acres currently
described as Section 3, Arden Acres, which is located adjacent to and directly
west of the intersection of Northwest Drive and Green Hill Road. The property
specifically occupies a proposed Second Replat of Arden Acres, Section Three,
Block 3, Tract 3 in western San Angelo.
Jeff Hintz, Planner, came forward to present this request, consistent with the staff
recommendation of approval. He gave some background about the property,
highlighting the classification for the property in the Vision Plan Map
("Commercial"). The area is surrounded by commercial properties, and there is
some undeveloped property, as well as ball fields to the west. The area was
annexed in 1997. Mr. Hintz reviewed the criteria required to be considered as part
of zone change requests. The request is consistent with the City's plans, policies
and ordinances and is compatible with the surrounding area. An Urban Design
Review was required due to the size of the planned construction, and this UDR has
been approved by the Interim Director/Planning Manager. This less intensive
zoning will provide a better transition than the stark commercial to low-intensity
residential change that exists today. The platting process will handle storm water
requirements and other development-related standards. The Comprehensive Plan
speaks to improving the relationship between adjacent commercial and residential
land use adjacencies, which staff finds this plan actually does. This property also
provides flexibility of design, meets the traffic capabilities of the area, and provides
infill development. The PD is the most predictable type of zoning district, as a
custom zoning ordinance is crafted for the use. Mr. Hintz addressed the community
need - providing a diverse mix of housing, and that it is far less intensive than the
current zoning allows.
Mr. Hintz showed the planned subdivision plat and the UDR that was approved by
the staff members. The concept plan for the ordinance, illustrating the layout of
residential buildings on this tract. The proposed PD ordinance only allows for multi-
family living and an amenity center. The development is in accordance with the
standards of the Zoning Ordinance. Signage will match the materials of the
dwelling units, and pole signs are strictly prohibited. Landscaping will be providing,
and a wrought iron fence with brick columns will surround the exterior of the site
along the boundaries. Sidewalks are also proposed, so it certainly makes this area
a walkable one. Mr. Hintz offered to answer any other questions or get into the
details of the ordinance more, but the Commission had no additional questions.
Justin McDonald, representing the applicant, came forward to answer any questions
the Commission had, and complimented the staff on their presentation. Mr. Wynne
asked for the number of units, and Mr. McDonald stated that there are 176 units
planned. Jennifer Boggs asked about the mix of units. Mr. McDonald mentioned
that the units will be a mix of 1b/1b, 2b/2b, and 3b/2b. Mr. Hintz answered

153. specifically the number of units that are allocated for each group. Mr. McDonald
mentioned that they also handled the apartment complex on Irene Street, and that it
will somewhat resemble those units.
No one else came forward to speak.
Motion, to approve as presented, was made by Darlene Jones and seconded by
Jennifer Boggs. The motion passed unanimously, 5-0.

154. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE
OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT
“A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS
AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE
FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: an unaddressed 9.8 acre property out
of approximately 75 acres currently described as Section 3, Arden
Acres, which is located adjacent to and directly west of the intersection
of Northwest Drive and Green Hill Road. The property specifically
occupies a proposed Second Replat of Arden Acres, Section Three,
Block 3, Tract 3 in western San Angelo, changing the zoning
classification from a combination of Single-Family Residential (RS-1)
and General Commercial (CG) to Planned Development (PD) District;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
RE: PD 13-01: West Company/Granger Macdonald
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governing
body for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law with
reference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publication
and otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property
owners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area and
in the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set out
herein; NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:
SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enacted
by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within
Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is
hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally
and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: an
unaddressed 9.8 acre property out of approximately 75 acres currently described as
Section 3, Arden Acres, which is located adjacent to and directly west of the
intersection of Northwest Drive and Green Hill Road in western San Angelo shall
henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Planned Development (PD) District
allowing for multi-family living and a lease house/amenity center.
The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of the
Director of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning.
SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove described
property shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code of
Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended.

155. SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment:
SEVERABILITY:
The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that, if any
portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity
of the other provisions of this Ordinance.
SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment:
PENALTY:
Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and,
upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in Section 1.106 of the Code of
Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of such violation shall constitute a
separate offense.
SECTION 5: Except as otherwise specified or limited below, the use and
development of the subject property shall generally conform to a High Rise Multi-Family
Residence (RM-2) zoning district unless specified as otherwise within this ordinance. All
activities shall be limited to those associated with multi-family living, lease
house/amenities center.
SECTION 6: Overall site use shall be in accordance with the map shown as Exhibit
A of this Ordinance. Changes to the usage of this property shall be approved through an
amendment to this Planned Development District with approval from the Planning
Commission and City Council.
SECTION 7: Design of the buildings, coloring, and materials shall conform to the
conditional approval given (see Urban Design Review 13-01) approved by the Planning
Director on February 8, 2013 and as maintained on file in the offices of the Planning
Division.
SECTION 8: The following uses are allowed on the subject property, and shall
include:
1. Apartment dwelling units for "Household Living" as defined in section 313.B.1 of
the Zoning Ordinance.
2. Offices are to be used solely for the management of the units developed on this
site as shown on the concept plan.
3. Incidental accessory uses are intended for tenants and their guests only; this
includes laundry facilities, lease house/amenities center, and recreational areas.
SECTION 9: Signage shall be allowed within this Planned Development District,
provided it meets all of the following criteria:

156. 1. On-site signage shall be limited to free-standing (specifically monument) types
only. Pole signage is expressly prohibited.
2. Internally illuminated signage is expressly prohibited.
3. All signage shall be constructed from the same materials and colors approved in
the conditional approval given (see Urban Design Review 13-01) approved by the
Planning Director on February 8, 2013 and as maintained on file in the offices of
the Planning Division.
4. Quantity of signage, area of signage, and placement of signage shall be as
directed within the Sign Ordinance for the City of San Angelo.
SECTION 10: Fencing around the exterior of the site and the pool area shall be
of wrought iron with masonry and stone columns consistent with the conditional approval
given (see Urban Design Review 13-01) approved by the Planning Director on February 8,
2013 and as maintained on file in the offices of the Planning Division. Other usage of
fencing material for screening purposes, within the confines of the concept plan for this
Planned Development shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 509
of the Zoning Ordinance.
SECTION 11: Parking standards within this Planned Development District shall
be as follows:
1. One bedroom apartments shall have 1.5 parking spaces per unit.
2. Two bedroom apartments shall have 1.75 parking spaces per unit
3. Three bedroom apartments shall have 2.0 parking spaces per unit.
4. Areas used for the rental office shall have 1 parking space per 300 square feet
gross of office space.
5. Design standards for the parking spaces shall be in accordance with Section
511 of the Zoning Ordinance. Section 511.G of the Zoning Ordinance defines
dimensions and maneuvering room. Section 511.F of the Zoning Ordinance
defines the maintenance of parking facilities.
SECTION 12: The sidewalks as shown on the graphic concept plan identified in
Exhibit A shall be no less than four feet in width, shall be installed prior to the issuance
of a certificate of occupancy, and shall meet all ADA accessibility standards.
SECTION 13: No outdoor storage shall be allowed within the boundaries of this
Planned Development District.

157. SECTION 14: This Planned Development district shall not be added to the
Official Zoning Map for the City of San Angelo, until the replat establishing Tract 3,
Block 3, in Section Three of the Arden Acres is recorded with the Tom Green County
Clerk.
INTRODUCED on the 5th day of March, 2013 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND
ADOPTED on this the 19th day of March, 2013.
THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO
____________________________________
Alvin New, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
Approved As To Content: Approved As To Form:
_________________________ ________________________
AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney
Development Services

158. Exhibit A, Site Plan

160. City of San Angelo
Memo
Meeting Date: February 19, 2013
To: City Council members
From: Roxanne Johnston, Planner
Subject: Z13-02: Debbie Clark. A request for approval of a zone
change from Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to Two-Family
Residential (RS-2) to specifically allow for “Household
Living” as allowed in RS-2 zoning districts on the following
property:
Location: 2008 Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of
the intersection of Beacon Street and Montague Avenue.
This property specifically occupies the Avondale Addition,
Block 10, Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo.
Purpose: Approval or modification of this request by the Planning
Commission would forward the recommendation to City
Council for a final decision on the matter.
Contacts: Debbie Clark 325-659-3901
Roxanne Johnston, Planner 325-657-4210
Caption: First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance
amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of
Ordinances, City of San Angelo
Z 13-02: Debbie Clark
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE
CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH
SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING
REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN
ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING

161. THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING
PROPERTY, TO WIT: 2008 Beacon Street, located on the
northeast corner of the intersection of Beacon Street and
Montague Avenue. This property specifically occupies the
Avondale Addition, Block 10, Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo,
changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family
Residential (RS-1) to a Two-Family Residential (RS-2) District;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
Summary: The City Council may:
(1) Approve this zone change request from RS-1 to RS-2 which would allow for
“Household Living” as allowed in RS-2 zoning districts; or
(2) Modify the application to some alternative zoning classification believed to
be more appropriate; or
(3) Deny this zoning request from RS-1 to RS-2.
Recommendation: City staff recommends approving the proposed zone
change.
On January 28, 2013, the Planning Commission recommended approval of this
request by a unanimous vote of 5-0.
History and Background:
General Information
Existing Zoning: Single Family Residential (RS-1)
Existing Land Use: Vacant property, vacant residence
Surrounding Zoning/Land Use:
North: RS-1 Residential
West: RS-1 & RS-2 Residential
South: RS-1 & OW Residential & vacant property
East: RS-1 & CO Residential & vacant property
Thoroughfares/Streets: Montague Avenue is defined as a “major
collector” and is designed to carry traffic at

162. moderate speeds to connect arterials to
local streets
Beacon Street is defined as a “local street”
which carries light neighborhood traffic at
lower speeds and generally connects to
collector streets.
Zoning History: The property has been a part of the city
limits since at least 1949 with little change
in zoning and use to the immediate area.
Applicable Regulations: Allowed uses for this property can be
found in Section 310 (Use Table) of the
Zoning Ordinance.
Section 511.B of the Zoning Ordinance
requires two off-street parking spaces per
dwelling unit.
Development Standards: Residential development setbacks are
outlined in Section 501 of the Zoning
Ordinance.
All required off-street parking and the
connection(s) to a public right-of-way are
required to be paved as defined in Section
511.F.3 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Vision Plan Map: Neighborhood for the subject properties with
a Transitional Zone located directly south on
Beacon Street as a buffer to Commercial
envisioned areas further south.
Related Comp Plan
Excerpts: “Create new physical connections to
neighborhoods lined with transitional and
intermediate uses."
"Promote neighborhood diversity and
security by encouraging a mix of age,
income, and housing choices within San
Angelo's neighborhoods.”
"Encourage in-fill development sensitive to the
existing and desired content of the area”
“Encourage the re-use of vacant buildings in the
city. Carefully integrate new uses into older

163. areas, in a manner that encourages comfort,
accessibility, efficiency and aesthetic gratification
for resident and visitor alike.”
“All residents within each neighborhood
boundary should be able to meet their daily
needs within a reasonable and accessible
distance from their home.”
"Variety of residential product types -
multi-family, townhomes, courtyard homes,
patio homes, etc."
Establish transition areas to better "scale-
down" intensity of use from commercial
centers to neighborhoods."
Special Information
Traffic Concerns: Changing the zoning to RS-2 will create
little impact on the volume of traffic than if
the property remained as-is, being that 4 of
the lots are vacant at this time.
Parking Requirements: New residential units require a minimum of
two off-street parking spaces. All areas used
for off-street parking shall be paved, per
Section 511.F.3 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Parking Provided: No paved parking spots at this time.
Density: Surrounding uses are predominately of a
low density residential nature. There are
many vacant lots in the area.
Notification Required: Yes
Notifications Sent: 22
Responses in Favor: 3
Responses in Opposition: 0
Analysis:
In order to approve this Zone change request, City Council members are first
required to consider the following criteria:

164. 1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is
compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies
adopted by the Planning Commission or City Council.
2. Consistent with Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to which the
proposed amendment would conflict with any portion of this Zoning
Ordinance.
3. Compatible with Surrounding Area. Whether and the extent to which the
proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses
surrounding the subject land and is the appropriate zoning district for the land.
4. Changed Conditions. Whether and the extent to which there are changed
conditions that require an amendment.
5. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which the
proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the
natural environment, including but not limited to water and air quality, noise,
storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the practical
functioning of the natural environment.
6. Community Need. Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment addresses a demonstrated community need.
7. Development Patterns. Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment would result in a logical and orderly pattern of urban
development in the community.
The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below.
The applicant stated to Planning Staff that she wished to re-zone so that she
could convert an existing vacant building into a duplex. This zone change request
from RS-1 to RS-2 is a only a slight change from current zoning and Staff feels
that the proposed change is in keeping with the 7 criteria listed above, all of
which will be explained in the following.
A zone change to RS-2 will allow the owner and future owners to enjoy the same
residential uses that are allowed by right as current zoning with just one
exception. Essentially, the only difference is that it allows a two family residence
or accessory apartment on the property. Because of this minute difference, the
proposed zone change is consistent with both the Zoning Ordinance and the
Comprehensive Plan. Again, since there is little change from its current zoning
the immediate area will remain residential. The proposed zone change area lies
amid an older, more established low-density residential area with large sections
of undeveloped land nearby to the east and north. Beacon Street dead ends

165. about 200 feet east of the property. As a major collector, Montague Street is
situated west of the subject property and ties into East Houston Harte
Expressway, located approximately 390 feet south of the property.
The Comprehensive Plan calls for residential areas to be typified by a mix of housing
stock, which in this case refers to the addition of a duplex, and for housing to be in
close proximity to commercial zones, which is also the case here. Two different uses
were introduced nearby; in 1982, an area approximately 155 feet west of the subject
property was re-zoned from RS-1 to RS-2 to allow for a duplex. In 1985, Special
Permit 1122 was given to allow for “a mobile home to be owner family occupied
and to have two residences on one zoning lot.” These illustrate a precedence by
the City Council to allow a mix of housing stock to the area, which was and still is in
keeping with the Comprehensive Plan as would allowing an additional zone change
from RS-1 to RS-2 in this area.
Conditions would remain relatively the same or may even improve should the
zone change be approved. There are several vacant lots in and around the
subject property. The Vision Plan calls for the subject property to remain as
‘Neighborhood’ in nature with a “Transitional” zoning district directly to the south.
This “Transitional” zone creates a buffer between commercial areas further
south, which is an ideal situation in terms of the Vision Plan. Therefore, the zone
change request is consistent with aspects of the Vision Plan and will most
certainly have a positive impact on current and future land uses. RS-2 zoning
here for a duplex could also encourage redevelopment and provide
encouragement for future neighborhood development that would be compatible
with surrounding uses, including Holiman Elementary School to the north of this
neighborhood and Producer’s Park to the northwest.
This zoning request would have minimal negative impacts on the natural
environment, again, since there is a little change between RS-1 and RS-2 uses.
The only perceivable difference would be that a minimum of two paved parking
spaces per dwelling unit and the access from the street to them are required per
Section 511 of the Ordinance, but this would cause overall minimal runoff to the
area as would the construction of a larger building footprint. These would most
likely not negatively affect neighboring properties.
San Angelo is experiencing a need for increased housing stock as our population
has been increasing. According to the United States Department of Commerce,
population increased by nearly 5,000 between the years 2000 and 2010. 1 In this
instance, an existing vacant house would be repurposed to provide more housing
to assist with community need, so Criteria 6 would be met should the zone
change be approved.
Smart
Also addressing community need is this: the proposed area is situated in what
contains several potential components of a walk-able community from a Smart
1
www.quickfacts.census.gov (accessed 01/18/13).

166. Growth point of view. Smart Growth, can be defined as “development that
serves the economy, the community and the environment”2 and promotes strong
neighborhoods through choices in transportation and housing. Smart Growth also
offers a higher level of social interaction, reduced emissions caused by
automobile travel and greater opportunities for physical opportunity that are
brought about by higher pedestrian and bicycling uses. Both Holiman
Elementary north on Montague Street and Producer’s Park to the northwest off of
Magnolia Street are located less than 1/3 of a mile from the subject property.
Commercial access exists less than a half a mile west from the subject property
along Bell Street. These are just three examples of current locations that area
residents have reasonable pedestrian and bicycle access to.
In addition to meeting Criteria 1-6, Staff feels this request is in keeping with
Criteria 7. A rezone to RS-2 is most certainly a logical progression in terms of
development patterns. Again, the change is very slight from the current zoning
and the Vision Plan calls for the area to remain residential. A rezone to RS-2
would have little negative impact on the area, if any, and again, could help
encourage future development in a predictable, orderly manner which is exactly
the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
Proposed Conditions
N/A
Attachments: Excerpt from zoning map, showing the general
location within the City of San Angelo;
excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject
property;
aerial photo, highlighting subject property;
excerpt from the Comprehensive Plan Vision map
highlighting the subject property; and
notification map highlighting responses from
neighboring properties.
citizen response letters;
draft minutes from January 28, 2013 Planning
Commission meeting; and
2
www.smartgrowthpa.org (accessed 01/22/13).

167. draft Ordinance.
Presentation: Roxanne Johnston, Planner
Reviewed by: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner (01/21/13)

168. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF
CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A
ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY
CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING
PROPERTY, TO WIT: 2008 Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner
of the intersection of Beacon Street and Montague Avenue. This property
specifically occupies the Avondale Addition, Block 10, Lots 15-20, in central
San Angelo; changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family
Residential (RS-1) to a Two-Family Residential (RS-2) District; PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
RE: Z 13-02: Debbie Clark
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governing
body for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law with
reference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publication
and otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property
owners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area and
in the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set out
herein; NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:
SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enacted
by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within
Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is
hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally
and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 2008
Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Beacon Street and
Montague Avenue. This property specifically occupies the Avondale Addition, Block 10,
Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo, shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Two-
Family Residential (RS-2) District.
The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of the
Director of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning.
SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove described
property shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code of
Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended.
SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment:

169. SEVERABILITY:
The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that,
if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not
affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.
SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment:
PENALTY:
Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in
Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of
such violation shall constitute a separate offense.
INTRODUCED on the 19th day of February, 2013 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND
ADOPTED on this the 5th day of March, 2013.
THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO
____________________________________
Alvin New, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
Approved As To Content: Approved As To Form:
_________________________ ________________________

170. AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

179. MINUTE RECORD OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON MONDAY, October 15, 2012 AT 9:00
AM IN THE SOUTH MEETING ROOM OF THE SAN ANGELO
CONVENTION CENTER, 500 RIO CONCHO DRIVE, SAN ANGELO,
TEXAS
PRESENT: Joe Grimes, Bill Lawrence, Jennifer Boggs, Darlene Jones,
Bill Wynne
ABSENT: Sebastian Guerrero (AE), Sam Tambunga (AE)
STAFF: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager
Jeff Hintz, Planner
Kevin Boyd, Planner
Roxanne Johnston, Planner
B. Z 13-02: Debbie Clark
A request for approval of a zone change from Single-Family Residential (RS-
1) to Two-Family Residential (RS-2) to specifically allow for “Household
Living” as allowed in RS-2 zoning districts on the following property:
2008 Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of
Beacon Street and Montague Avenue. This property specifically occupies
the Avondale Addition, Block 10, Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo.
Roxanne Johnston came forward to present this item, consistent with the staff
recommendation of approval. There were 22 notifications sent out, with 3
returned in favor and 0 returned in opposition of the request. She showed a
series of maps to the Commission members, illustrating the area in which the
subject property is located. She illustrated the tracts representing owners who
were in favor of this request. Ms. Johnston also reviewed the criteria of
approval which the Zoning Ordinance requires to be considered in all zone
change cases. Ms. Johnston discussed that the Comprehensive Plan
discusses establishing a mix of housing within neighborhoods and encourages
"neighborhood" development in this area, which staff feels this would meet.
This is especially so when realizing that there is an area for "transitional"
development immediately adjacent to the property.
The area is largely developed in a traditional neighborhood style, with
infrastructure and a street network largely reflective of - and appropriate for -

180. this type of development. There is a school in this neighborhood area, along
with a city park. There are a few businesses in the area that help promote a
walkable community. Staff feels a minor change in land use fits in and meets
all of the criteria which are required for consideration in this area as outlined in
the Comprehensive Plan.
There were no questions for Ms. Johnston.
Debbie Clark, the proponent, came forward to speak in favor of this request.
She would like to develop this area now and in the future.
There was no one else in attendance who desired to speak on this item.
Motion, to approve as presented, was made by Bill Wynne and seconded by
Jennifer Boggs. Motion passed unanimously, 5-0.

181. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF
CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A
ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY
CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING
PROPERTY, TO WIT: 2008 Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner
of the intersection of Beacon Street and Montague Avenue. This property
specifically occupies the Avondale Addition, Block 10, Lots 15-20, in central
San Angelo; changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family
Residential (RS-1) to a Two-Family Residential (RS-2) District; PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
RE: Z 13-02: Debbie Clark
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governing
body for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law with
reference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publication
and otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property
owners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area and
in the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set out
herein; NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:
SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enacted
by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within
Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is
hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally
and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 2008
Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Beacon Street and
Montague Avenue. This property specifically occupies the Avondale Addition, Block 10,
Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo, shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Two-
Family Residential (RS-2) District.
The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of the
Director of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning.
SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove described
property shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code of
Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended.
SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment:
SEVERABILITY:

182. The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that,
if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not
affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.
SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment:
PENALTY:
Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in
Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of
such violation shall constitute a separate offense.
INTRODUCED on the 19th day of February, 2013 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND
ADOPTED on this the 5th day of March, 2013.
THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO
____________________________________
Alvin New, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
Approved As To Content: Approved As To Form:
_________________________ ________________________
AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

183. City of San
Angelo
Memo
Meeting Date: February 19, 2013
To: City Council members
From: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner
Subject: Z 13-03 Tom Green County: A request for approval of a
zone change from Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to
Neighborhood Commercial (CN) to specifically allow for
commercial opportunities as allowed in CN zoning districts
on the following property:
Location: 318 North Bell Street, located on the northeast corner of the
intersection of North Bell Street and Spaulding Street. This
property specifically occupies the Bell Addition, Block 9, 2.35
acres in the southwest corner of Block 9, in north central San
Angelo.
Purpose: Approval of this request would zone the property
Neighborhood Commercial (CN)
Contacts: Judge Michael D. Brown 325-653-3318
Jeff Hintz, Planner 325-657-4210
Caption: First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an
Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning
Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo
Z 13-03: Tom Green County
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO,
TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12
ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A
ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A

184. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING
AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY,
TO WIT: 318 North Bell Street, located on the northeast
corner of the intersection of North Bell Street and
Spaulding Street. This property specifically occupies the
Bell Addition, Block 9, 2.35 acres in the southwest corner
of Block 9, in north central San Angelo, changing the
zoning classification from Single-Family Residential (RS-1)
to Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
Summary: The City Council may:
(1) Approve the proposed zone change; or
(2) Remand the application back to Planning Commission for further discussion,
in which case another public hearing will need to be scheduled; or
(3) Deny the proposed zone change.
Recommendation: Planning staff recommends approving the proposed
zone change.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of this request 5-0 at the
January 28, 2013 Meeting.
History and Background:
General Information
Existing Zoning: Single-Family Residential (RS-1)
Existing Land Use: Vacant office building and parking lot
Surrounding Zoning/Land Use:
North: CG/CH Various retail establishments
West: RS-1 Mobile Home Park
South: RS-1 Church & single-family residences
East: CN & RS-1 Church & single-family residences

185. Thoroughfares/Streets: Pulliam Street & North Bell Street are defined
as "arterial streets," and designed to connect
collector streets to freeways and other
arterials carrying large volumes of traffic at
high speeds. Access is secondary and
mobility is the primary function of these
streets.
Zoning History: Special Permit 200 approved in August of
1966 allowed the construction of a "welfare
building" in an RS-1 zoning district.
Applicable Regulations: Allowed uses for this property can be
found in Section 310 (Use Table) of the
Zoning Ordinance
Development Standards: Section 502 of the Zoning Ordinance
covers general development standards for
the property.
In CN districts, “Type 1 Outdoor Display
shall be allowed adjacent to a principal
building wall and extending to a distance
no greater than 5 feet from the wall.
Such storage shall not be permitted to
block windows, entrances or exits, and
shall not impair the ability of pedestrians to
use the building.”
Vision Plan Map: Neighborhood Center
Comp Plan Excerpts: Within the Comprehensive Plan, Goal 3 of
“Neighborhoods” is to “improve the
relationship between adjacent commercial
and residential properties”. CG/CH zoning
currently borders the RS-1 properties, a
CN zoning would be a more suitable and
less harsh buffer between the two.
“Commercial properties tend to be
organized in a single use, isolated pattern
of development. This form generates little
synergy between businesses and land
uses and often results in incompatibility.”
“All residents within each neighborhood
boundary should be able to meet their
daily needs within a reasonable and
accessible distance from their home.”

186. “Promote better transition between nearby
commercial and residential use of land and
buildings.”
“Rezone or remove any CG/CH zoning
from adjacent to existing neighborhoods."
“Require a buffer separating commercial,
industrial, or agricultural zoned lands from
neighborhoods.”
“Establish transition areas between
commercial areas and nearby
neighborhoods.”
“Organize commercial uses in nodes to
avoid deteriorating corridors.”
Special Information
Traffic Concerns: Changing the zoning from residential to
commercial generally will add traffic to an
area, however given the past zoning
history on the property, this residential
property has functioned as commercial
property for decades.
Parking Requirements: Section 511 of the Zoning Ordinance
covers parking standards and
requirements vary by proposed usage(s).
Parking Provided: It appears off-street parking is available on
this lot; the number of spots will depend
upon lot orientation and future building
configuration.
Density: This general area is of medium density
residential and higher intensity commercial
uses that are of a lower density.
Notification Required: Yes
Notifications Sent: 17
Responses in Favor: 0
Responses in Opposition: 0

187. Analysis:
In order to approve this zone change request, the City Council members are first
required to consider the following criteria:
1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is
compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies adopted
by the Planning Commission or City Council.
2. Consistent with Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to which the
proposed amendment would conflict with any portion of this Zoning Ordinance.
3. Compatible with Surrounding Area. Whether and the extent to which the
proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding
the subject land and is the appropriate zoning district for the land.
4. Changed Conditions. Whether and the extent to which there are changed
conditions that require an amendment.
5. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural
environment, including but not limited to water and air quality, noise, storm water
management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the practical functioning of the
natural environment.
6. Community Need. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment
addresses a demonstrated community need.
7. Development Patterns. Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment would result in a logical and orderly pattern of urban development in
the community.
The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below.
In looking at this proposal, Planning staff has found that a CN zoning district is
compatible with the plans and policies in place for the community and that the
zone change is consistent with the zoning ordinance. This particular property has
functioned as a public building in some fashion for nearly 50 years despite the
RS-1 zoning. This area between Pulliam Street and Koberlin Street is a mixed
use are with a multitude of varying uses. Houses, churches, and some lower
intensity commercial opportunities make sense; the plans and policies in place
for the community recognize this need for neighborhood serving businesses that
a CN zoning district will allow for.
Introducing a more intensive zoning district would not be appropriate for this area
given the intensive land uses allowed for in CG/CH zoning that is present on

188. Pulliam. A CN zoning designation will provide a suitable buffer into the
neighborhoods that are prevalent to the south of this subject property without
diminishing the ability for this property to develop. At the same time, a CN zone
will also allow the responsible and sustainable development of the
neighborhoods to the south. This zone change request is certainly in line with the
intent of the Zoning Ordinance as responsible & predictable development for
properties both new and in the future is exactly the intent of the Zoning
Ordinance.
Staff believes that the CN zoning in this area is compatible with the surrounding
area; as previously mentioned, the lower intensity commercial opportunities that
are allowed within this zoning district have high potential to be an asset to the
neighborhood in both the short and long term. While not all types of commercial
activities would be appropriate for this particular property (given the proximity to
the neighborhood, churches, and other lower intensity businesses) staff believes
some lower intensity neighborhood serving businesses would be a fit that is
compatible with the surrounding area. Several properties to the south of this
general area provide prime opportunities for some infill development; some new
businesses that serve the area may have the potential to revitalize this area and
usher in the infill development.
This area is envisioned within the Comprehensive Plan's Vision Map as a
"Neighborhood Center." CN zoning fits in this vision. Neighborhood Center
envisioned areas are designed to compliment neighborhoods with opportunities
for higher density residential opportunities and some lower intensity, lower scale
commercial opportunities. In this case, the Neighborhood Center envisioned area
provides these development opportunities, and serves as a buffer from the
"Industrial" and higher intensity "Commercial" envisioned areas just to the
northwest of this area. Since this particular zone change is in harmony with the
Comprehensive Plan, there is no need for an amendment to the Comprehensive
Plan to approve this request.
In addition, staff does not believe the impact on the natural environment will be
detrimentally affected through the approval of this zone change. While some
impact due to storm water runoff will certainly be taking place (since the property
is already improved) staff is unable to find any other negative environmental
consequences that will result from this zone change. Staff also believes this zone
change request has potential to serve a community need in this particular area.
Pulliam Street offers multiple opportunities for higher intensity commercial
development in the CG/CH zoning district in this area, however the opportunities
for neighborhood serving, walkable businesses in this area are less prevalent.
From this standpoint, staff believes this proposal for CN zoning will help to fill a
community need and be a benefit to the area.
Staff finds that a CN zoning district on the subject property will create an orderly
development pattern that is consistent with the surrounding area. As one travels

189. south from Pulliam along Bell Street, the character of the area is much less
intense and becomes solely residential fairly quickly. Staff feels anything more
intensive in this area has the potential to upset this balance and encroach into a
long standing neighborhood. It should be mentioned that this neighborhood has
been zoned as RS-1 since approximately 1954 and for the most part has
developed as such with little commercial encroachment. Staff finds is necessary
to protect and promote the current and future growth of this neighborhood; the
introduction of CN zoning will allow this to occur while serving the needs of the
residents of this neighborhood at the same time. Neighborhood serving, walkable
businesses will serve the neighborhood in this area both now and in the future;
the goals of infill, walkable development are highly in line with the City's
Comprehensive Plan and sound neighborhood development principles. Staff
believes this request will be a responsible addition, that is in harmony with the
neighborhood and will only aid in the future development of the area.
Proposed Conditions
N/A
Attachments: excerpt from zoning map, showing the general location
within the City of San Angelo;
excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject
property;
aerial photo, highlighting subject property;
excerpt from the Comprehensive Plan Vision Map
highlighting the subject property;
draft minutes from 01/28/13 Planning Commission
meeting; and
Draft Ordinance.
Presentation: AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services.

194. C. Z 13-03: Tom Green County
A request for approval of a zone change from Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to
Neighborhood Commercial (CN) to specifically allow for commercial opportunities
as allowed in CN zoning districts on the following property:
318 North Bell Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of North
Bell Street and Spaulding Street. This property specifically occupies the Bell
Addition, Block 9, 2.35 acres in the southwest corner of Block 9, in north central
San Angelo.
Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner, came forward to present this request, consistent
with the staff recommendation of approval. Mr. Hintz began by revealing that 17
notifications were sent out on this request, and 0 were received in favor or in
opposition to this request. Mr. Hintz explained that Tom Green County is looking to
sell this property. Mr. Hintz revealed that the Vision Plan map calls for
"neighborhood center" at this location. A number of photographs were shown on
and around the site. There are two churches in close proximity to this location, and
a large neighborhood, which is mostly developed. The Comprehensive Plan
encourages buffer zones to be located between commercial properties and
residential neighborhoods. This property is in a prime location to provide such a
buffer zone, and the proposal is consistent with that idea. There is a mix of zoning
districts in the area, as well as a special permit in place which would allow a
"welfare building" on the property - which is what the county utilized that site for at
one time. He referred back to the criteria of approval which Ms. Johnston reviewed
in depth in the previous case. Mr. Hintz also reviewed several excerpts from the
city's Comprehensive Plan which supports this type of zoning at this location. This
proposal is consistent with the City's plans and policies. Staff believes this type of
zoning is suitable for this area and is a good fit as opposed to heavier types of
commercial zoning. This does follow development patterns for this area. Staff sees
little anticipated effect on the natural environment, especially when considering that
the building is already constructed and in place.
Bill Lawrence asked for clarification regarding the buffer zone placement at this
location and addressed the opportunity for a better and more appropriate transition
to be placed at this site. The "neighborhood center" is intended for higher-density
residential development, and so the current zoning does not work in line with that
intention.
Bill Wynne stated his opinion that this would correct the zoning that has long been
in place.
Judge Mike Brown, with Tom Green County, came forward to speak in favor of this
request. He stated that their objective is to have the zoning changed to something
more marketable in order to offer it for sale down the road. The building is currently
vacant.
There were no other comments in favor or in opposition of the request.

195. Motion, to approve as presented, was made by Joe Grimes and seconded by
Jennifer Boggs. The motion passed unanimously, 5-0.

196. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF
CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A
ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY
CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING
PROPERTY, TO WIT: 318 North Bell Street, located on the northeast corner
of the intersection of North Bell Street and Spaulding Street. This property
specifically occupies the Bell Addition, Block 9, 2.35 acres in the southwest
corner of Block 9, in north central San Angelo, changing the zoning
classification from Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to Neighborhood
Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING
A PENALTY
RE: Z 13-03: Tom Green County
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governing
body for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law with
reference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publication
and otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property
owners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area and
in the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set out
herein; NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:
SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enacted
by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within
Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is
hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally
and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 318
North Bell Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of North Bell
Street and Spaulding Street. This property specifically occupies the Bell Addition,
Block 9, 2.35 acres in the southwest corner of Block 9, in north central San Angelo,
shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Neighborhood Commercial (CN)
District.
The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of the
Director of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning.
SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove described
property shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code of
Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended.

197. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF
CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A
ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY
CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING
PROPERTY, TO WIT: 318 North Bell Street, located on the northeast corner
of the intersection of North Bell Street and Spaulding Street. This property
specifically occupies the Bell Addition, Block 9, 2.35 acres in the southwest
corner of Block 9, in north central San Angelo, changing the zoning
classification from Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to Neighborhood
Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING
A PENALTY
RE: Z 13-03: Tom Green County
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governing
body for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law with
reference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publication
and otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property
owners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area and
in the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set out
herein; NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:
SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enacted
by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within
Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is
hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally
and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 318
North Bell Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of North Bell
Street and Spaulding Street. This property specifically occupies the Bell Addition,
Block 9, 2.35 acres in the southwest corner of Block 9, in north central San Angelo,
shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Neighborhood Commercial (CN)
District.
The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of the
Director of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning.
SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove described
property shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code of
Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended.

198. SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment:
SEVERABILITY:
The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that,
if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not
affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.
SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment:
PENALTY:
Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in
Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of
such violation shall constitute a separate offense.
INTRODUCED on the 19th day of February, 2013 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND
ADOPTED on this the 5th day of March, 2013.
THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO
____________________________________
Alvin New, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
Approved As To Content: Approved As To Form:
_________________________ ________________________
AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

199. SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment:
SEVERABILITY:
The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that,
if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not
affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.
SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment:
PENALTY:
Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in
Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of
such violation shall constitute a separate offense.
INTRODUCED on the 19th day of February, 2013 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND
ADOPTED on this the 5th day of March, 2013.
THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO
____________________________________
Alvin New, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
Approved As To Content: Approved As To Form:
_________________________ ________________________
AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

200. City of San
Angelo
Memo
Meeting Date: February 19, 2013
To: City Council members
From: Roxanne Johnston, Planner
Subject: Z 13-04 Abel Fernandez. A request for approval of a zone
change from Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to
Neighborhood Commercial (CN) to specifically allow for
commercial opportunities as allowed in CN zoning districts
on the following property:
Location: 1006 East 14th Street, located approximately 170 feet from the
northeast intersection at East 14th Street and Wade Street. This
property specifically occupies the Exall Addition, Block 9, Lot 8
Exc. West 88.7’, in north central San Angelo.
Purpose: Approval or modification of this request by the Planning
Commission would forward that recommendation to City
Council for a final decision on the matter.
Contacts: Abel Fernandez, property owner 325-482-0946
Roxanne Johnston, Planner 325-657-4210
Caption: First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an
Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning
Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo
Z 13-04: Abel Fernandez
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT
“A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN
ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF
CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE
DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE

201. WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE
ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING
PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1006 East 14th Street, located
approximately 170 feet from the northeast intersection
at East 14th Street and Wade Street. This property
specifically occupies the Exall Addition, Block 9, Lot 8
Exc. West 88.7’, in north central San Angelo, changing
the zoning classification from a Single-Family
Residential (RS-1) to a Neighborhood Commercial
(CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND
PROVIDING A PENALTY
Summary: The City Council may:
(1) Approve this zone change request from RS-1 to RS-2 which would allow for
“Household Living” as allowed in RS-2 zoning districts; or
(2) Modify the application to some alternative zoning classification believed to
be more appropriate; or
(3) Deny this zoning request from RS-1 to RS-2.
Recommendation: City staff recommends approving the proposed zone change.
On January 28, 2013, the Planning Commission recommended approval of this request
by a unanimous vote of 5-0.
History and Background:
General Information
Existing Zoning: Single-Family Residential (RS-1)
Existing Land Use: Vacant residential
Surrounding Zoning/Land Use:
North: RS-1 Single-Family Residential
West: RS-1 Single-Family Residential
South: RS-1 Single-Family Residential
East: RS-1 Single-Family Residential

202. Thoroughfares/Streets: East 14th Street is defined as a “collector
street” which provides direct access to
residential, commercial and other land
uses.
Wade Street is defined a "local street" and
is designed to carry light traffic at lower
speeds and generally connects to collector
streets.
East Main Street is defined as an “arterial
street” and is designed to connect collector
streets to freeways and other arterials
carrying large volumes of traffic at high
speeds. Access is secondary and mobility
is the primary function of these streets.
Zoning History: Residential as early as 1939.
Applicable Regulations: Allowed uses for this property can be
found in Section 310 (Use Table) of the
Zoning Ordinance.
.
Refer to off-street parking standards, per
Section 511.
Section 602.
“B. No nonconforming structure may be
enlarged, expanded or extended in such a
manner that it shall be made more
nonconforming… A non-conforming
structure may be enlarged expanded or
extended so long as the nonconforming
feature is not enlarged, expanded or
extended, thereby making the structure
more nonconforming.”
Development Standards: Section 502. Nonresidential Development
Standards
Neighborhood Commercial (CN) requires a
25 feet front setback for commercial
structures. No side or rear setback are
required in commercial districts unless the
lot abuts a residential district or use, where
a minimum of 10 feet is required.

203. Section 504 of the Zoning Ordinance
covers outdoor storage and display. Aside
from Type 1 outdoor display, no other
outside storage is allowed here.
A.1. “Type 1 Outdoor Display shall be
allowed adjacent to a principal building
wall and extending to a distance no greater
than 5 feet from the wall. Such storage
shall not be permitted to block windows,
entrances or exits, and shall not impair the
ability of pedestrians to use the building.
E.1. “Unless specifically authorized
elsewhere… all outdoor storage and
display shall be located outside the public
right-of-way and/or at least 15 feet from
the back edge of the adjacent curb or
street pavement.
Section 509. Fences
A.1. “A privacy fence shall be required
where the side or rear lot line of a
nonresidential use is adjacent to either of
the following.
a. A residential district boundary
other than the R&E District.
b. An existing residential use.
Vision Plan Map: Neighborhood Center & Neighborhood
Comp Plan Excerpts: Within the Comprehensive Plan, Goal 3 of
“Neighborhoods” is to “improve the
relationship between adjacent commercial
and residential properties”.
“All residents within each neighborhood
boundary should be able to meet their
daily needs within a reasonable and
accessible distance from their home.”
“Promote better transition between nearby
commercial and residential use of land and
buildings.”

204. “Establish transition areas between
commercial areas and nearby
neighborhoods.”
“Address issues related to the transition of
older homes into offices, including parking
and compatibility with surrounding areas.”
Special Information
Traffic Concerns: Changing the zoning from residential to
commercial use will generally add traffic to
an area, but due to the small lot size and
that CN is the least intensive of
commercial zoning, potential businesses
locating there will most likely yield little
traffic than would more intensive uses.
Parking Requirements: Section 511 of the Zoning Ordinance
covers parking standards; the requirement
varies depending on the proposed
usage(s). The requirement for a tax
service establishment, for example, would
be 1 space paved per 300ft2 gross floor
area.
Parking Provided: It appears off-street parking opportunity is
available on this lot; the number of spots
will depend upon lot orientation and future
building configuration.
Density: This general area is of light to medium
density residential with lower density
businesses outside of the current RS-1
zone. The zone change request complies
with the Vision Plan, which calls for a
continuation of the future development
of this area as “Neighborhood Center."
Notification Required: Yes
Notifications Sent: 13
Responses in Favor: 0
Responses in Opposition: 0
Analysis:

205. In order to approve this zone change request, the City Council members are first
required to consider the following criteria:
1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is
compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies adopted
by the Planning Commission or City Council.
2. Consistent with Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to which the
proposed amendment would conflict with any portion of this Zoning Ordinance.
3. Compatible with Surrounding Area. Whether and the extent to which the
proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding
the subject land and is the appropriate zoning district for the land.
4. Changed Conditions. Whether and the extent to which there are changed
conditions that require an amendment.
5. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural
environment, including but not limited to water and air quality, noise, storm water
management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the practical functioning of the
natural environment.
6. Community Need. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment
addresses a demonstrated community need.
7. Development Patterns. Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment would result in a logical and orderly pattern of urban development in
the community.
The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below.
The subject property is located on the fringes of an older RS-1 zoning district
within 300 feet of North Main Street. The applicant is planning to operate a tax
service business from the property and seeks to repurpose a vacant house to do
so. Atmos Energy, a planned development, is located near the property to the
northeast. There are a variety of mixed uses and zoning to the east and
southeast of the subject property which include an assisted living and retirement
facilities. To the north, within walking distance of well under ½ a mile, are a
variety of businesses that support neighborhood services such as restaurants
and car repair shops. Near the same area to the north are more intense land
uses (CG/CH) that allow for heavy land use, such as junk yards; although
certainly not allowed on the subject property. In the future, the Vision Plan calls
for CG/CH zoning districts to be phased out.

206. In looking at this proposal, Planning Staff has found that a CN zoning district is
compatible with the plans and policies in place for the community and that the
zone change is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. Staff feels this request is
compatible with and appropriate to the surrounding area. A CN zoning district lies
less than 35 feet from the southeastern section of the property. The Vision Plan
calls for about 1/3 of the subject property to the east to be zoned “Neighborhood
Center” with the remaining staying “Residential.” Due to the size of this property,
the nature of businesses that could locate there in the future are constricted by
the lot size and limited area for parking, so this property use will likely remain
smaller and less intensive in nature and would generate little traffic to the area.
Residential near CN zoning which allows lower intensity commercial
opportunities make sense; the plans and policies in place for the community
recognize this need for neighborhood serving businesses that a CN zoning
district will allow for. With the subject property's proximity to North Main Street to
the east, the area has already seen a variety of change.
The second possible challenge is that a portion of a neighboring residence is
located on the western side of subject property and is legally non-conforming as
it has been there since 2000. The proposed zone change would necessitate the
construction of an opaque fence between the residence to the west and
businesses located on the subject property. According to Section 502 of the
Zoning Ordinance, there can be no fewer than 10 feet between the proposed use
and a residence. There is currently a 4’ chain link fence between the building on
the subject property and the neighboring residence to the west.
Staff believes that the CN zoning in this area is compatible with the surrounding
area. As previously mentioned, the lower intensity commercial opportunities that
are allowed within this zoning district have high potential to be an asset to the
neighborhood in both the short and long term. While not all types of commercial
activities would be appropriate for this particular property, given the lot size and
proximity to the neighborhood and other lower intensity businesses, staff believes
some lower intensity neighborhood serving businesses would be a fit that is
compatible with the surrounding area. Since this particular zone change is in
harmony with the Comprehensive Plan, there is no need for an amendment to
the Comprehensive Plan to approve this request.
Staff does not believe the impact on the natural environment will be detrimentally
affected through the approval of this zone change. Staff is unable to find any
negative environmental consequences that will result from this zone change.
Given that semi-industrial uses are not allowed within CN zoning, the zone
change will not bring about the noises and odors often associated with a heavier
commercially zoned district. Staff also believes this zone change request has
potential to serve a community need in this particular area, even given the
example of the applicant’s desire to locate a tax service business there. Other
businesses that would be a fit for the same property include those of a

207. community services nature and a small new or used retail sales and services
business such as product repair, for example (since the property is relatively
small) to name just a few.
Staff finds that a CN zoning district on the subject property will create an orderly
development pattern that is consistent with the surrounding area. CG/CH, RS-2,
CG, and CN zoning currently borders the RS-1 properties. Staff feels anything
more intensive in this area has the potential to upset this balance and encroach
into a long standing neighborhood. This neighborhood has been zoned
residential since at least 1939 and has experienced, for the most part, a sensible
mix of zoning around it. Staff finds it necessary to protect and promote the
current and future growth of this neighborhood and the introduction of CN zoning
will allow this to occur while serving the needs of the residents of this
neighborhood both now and in the future. The goals of infill and walk-able
development are highly in line with the City's Comprehensive Plan and are in
harmony with the neighborhood. Lastly, it is possible that this development may
serve to aid in future area development.
Proposed Conditions
N/A
Attachments: excerpt from zoning map, showing the general location
within the City of San Angelo;
excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject
property;
aerial photo, highlighting subject property;
excerpt from the Comprehensive Plan Vision Map
highlighting the subject property; and
draft minutes from January 28, 2013 Planning
Commission meeting; and
draft Ordinance
Presentation: Roxanne Johnston, Planner
Reviewed by: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner (01/21/13)

212. MINUTE RECORD OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING HELD ON MONDAY, January 28, 2013 AT 9:00 AM IN THE SOUTH
MEETING ROOM OF THE SAN ANGELO CONVENTION CENTER, 500 RIO CONCHO
DRIVE, SAN ANGELO, TEXAS
PRESENT: Joe Grimes, Bill Lawrence, Jennifer Boggs, Darlene Jones, Bill Wynne
ABSENT: Sebastian Guerrero (AE), Sam Tambunga (AE)
STAFF: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager
Jeff Hintz, Planner
Kevin Boyd, Planner
Roxanne Johnston, Planner
D. Z 13-04: Abel Fernandez
A request for approval of a zone change from Single-Family Residential (RS-
1) to Neighborhood Commercial (CN) to specifically allow for a tax service
business as allowed in CN zoning districts on the following property:
1006 East 14th Street, located approximately 170 feet from the northeast
intersection at East 14th Street and Wade Street. This property specifically
occupies the Exall Addition, Block 9, Lot 8 Exc. West 88.7’, in north central
San Angelo.
Roxanne Johnston, Planner, came forward to present this request, consistent
with the staff recommendation of approval. Ms. Johnston noted that there were
13 notifications sent out on this request, with 0 returned in favor or in opposition
to the request. The subject property is a residential structure, which sits on the
edge of a neighborhood and near Main Street, which has a mix of zoning district
types. There are also some empty lots in this area. The eastern section of the
subject property terminates at an alley bifurcating the neighborhood, creating a
triangular shaped property. There is a single-family residential area in and
around this location, and the residential usage of the area dates back to 1939.
The subject property is located on the fringe of an RS-1 neighborhood. The
desire is to have a tax service business at this location. There are several
zoning districts within a 1/2 mile of this location. A CN zoning district would be
compatible with the plans and policies of the city. She again referred to the
need and appropriateness for a buffer between the mix of uses nearby and this
large residential area. The concept of "neighborhood" is for low-impact
business, of which this is one. CN is the least intensive type of commercial
zoning. The small lot size does limit naturally the types of businesses which
could locate on the lot. However, the scale of a neighborhood center would be
appropriate. There is a CN zone currently in existence less than 35' from the
subject property. The zone change does trigger placement of a 6' opaque
privacy fence to screen from the residential area nearby. The request is
consistent with the Vision Plan map as well as the city plans and criteria outlined
in the Zoning Ordinance. Businesses that are allowed in CN allow small new or
used retail sales or services, along with office usage. More intensive zoning

213. would potentially upset the balance and encroach into a large and long-
established neighborhood.
Darlene Jones asked if this business would strictly be a business or if it would
also be a residential use. It was responded that it would be allowed to be a
business only - this type of zoning would not allow residential living.
Jennifer Boggs also asked a couple of questions regarding the parking.
Fortunately, the floor-area ratio limit for this site would limit much of an additional
expansion, meaning that parking would not likely need to increase by more than
one space in the future.
The proponent, Abel Fernandez, came forward and spoke in favor of this
request. He stated that he does not currently have any employees.
Joe Grimes asked if the stipulations that were required were fine with the
applicant. Mr. Fernandez expressed his acceptance of the requirements.
No one else came forward to speak on this request.
Motion, to approve as presented, was made by Darlene Jones and seconded by
Joe Grimes. The motion passed unanimously, 5-0.

214. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF
CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A
ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY
CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING
PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1006 East 14th Street, located approximately 170 feet
from the northeast intersection at East 14th Street and Wade Street. This
property specifically occupies the Exall Addition, Block 9, Lot 8 Exc. West
88.7’, in north central San Angelo; changing the zoning classification from
a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN)
District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
RE: Z 13-04: Abel Fernandez
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governing
body for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law with
reference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publication
and otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property
owners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area and
in the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set out
herein; NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:
SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enacted
by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within
Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is
hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally
and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 2008
Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Beacon Street and
Montague Avenue. This property specifically occupies the Avondale Addition, Block 10,
Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo; shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows:
Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District.
The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of the
Director of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning.
SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove described
property shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code of
Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended.
SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment:
SEVERABILITY:

215. The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that,
if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not
affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.
SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment:
PENALTY:
Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in
Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of
such violation shall constitute a separate offense.
INTRODUCED on the 19 day of February, 2013 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND
ADOPTED on this the 5th day of March, 2013.
THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO
____________________________________
Alvin New, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
Approved As To Content: Approved As To Form:
_________________________ ________________________
AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

216. City of San Angelo
Memo
Meeting Date: March 5, 2013
To: City Council members
From: Kevin Boyd, Planner
Subject: Z 13-06: City of San Angelo Development Corporation, a request for a
zone change from Light Manufacturing (ML) to Heavy Manufacturing
(MH) to allow for activities allowed within MH zoning districts, on the
following property:
Location: 1020, 1030, & 1040 Gateway Drive, located east of the intersection of
Gateway Drive and FM 380; more specially occupying the Gateway
Addition, Section 1, Block 3, Lots 1 and 2 and Tract A, in Section 1
being a 20.059 acres, in northeast San Angelo.
Purpose: Approval of this request would zone the property Heavy
Manufacturing (MH).
Contacts: COSA Development Corporation, owner 325-653-7197
Kevin Boyd, Planner 325-657-4210
Caption: First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance
amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of
Ordinances, City of San Angelo
Z 13-06: City of San Angelo Development Corporation
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE
OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID
EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE
DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND
CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1020,
1030, & 1040 Gateway Drive, located east of the intersection of Gateway
Drive and FM 380; more specially occupying the Gateway Addition,
Section 1, Block 3, Lots 1 and 2 and Tract A, in Section 1 being a 20.059
acres, in northeast San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from

217. Light Manufacturing (ML) to Heavy Manufacturing (MH) District;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
Summary: The City Council may:
(1) Approve the proposed zone change as requested; or
(2) Remand the application back to Planning Commission for further discussion, in
which case another public hearing will need to be scheduled; or
(3) Deny the proposed zone change.
Recommendation: Planning staff recommends approving the proposed zone
change.
History and Background:
General Information
Existing Zoning: Light Manufacturing (ML)
Existing Land Use: Undeveloped land
Surrounding Zoning/Land Use:
North: Light Manufacturing (ML) Angelo Achieves
West: Light Manufacturing (ML) Undeveloped land
South: Unincorporated Undeveloped land
East: Light Manufacturing (ML) Undeveloped land
Thoroughfares/Streets: FM 380 is classified as an ‘arterial street’ which is
designed to be a major thoroughfare that carries
heavy traffic to points of interest throughout the
city.
Gateway Drive is classified as a "local street" and
is designed to carry light traffic at lower speeds
and generally connects to collector streets.
Zoning History: The property was annexed into the city in
November 1997 and later rezoned to Light
Manufacturing (ML) in December 1997, refer to
case Z 97-51.
2

218. Applicable Regulations: 316.B.1 of the Zoning Ordinance states, ..."If the
uses routinely subject the surrounding area to
noxious or malodorous impacts, they are
considered heavy manufacturing and production.."
Development Standards: All required off-street parking and the
connection(s) to a public right-of-way are required
to be paved.
Vision Plan Map: Industrial
Related Comp Plan Excerpts: Intent of Industrial in the Comprehensive
Plan is to, “[dedicate areas for] supporting the
local economy while mitigating some of their
potentially undesirable secondary effects on
nearby residences.”
Industrial section goal one of the
Comprehensive Plan is to "Organize LULUs
(Locally Undesirable Land Uses) into
clusters." The purpose of this goal is to:
"Cluster potentially hazardous industries into
a limited number (given the size of San
Angelo) of larger, isolated areas will minimize
negative effects on residential areas, while
balancing access to these businesses within
the region, rather than putting all of them into
one location."
Special Information
Traffic Concerns: Changing the zoning to a more intensive industrial
district has the potential to generate additional
traffic than if the property remained as-is.
However, given the limited number of visitors to
industrial zoned properties, and ease of access to
the highway for transport, staff is not concerned
with the development of this property as heavy
industrial.
Parking Requirements: Vary depending upon the use of the property, see
Section 511.
Parking Provided: Currently, no parking exist on the site, though it is
a sizable tract.
3

219. Density: Predominantly large tracts of undeveloped land in
the surrounding areas. The Vision Plan also calls
for a continuation of the future development of this
area as Industrial, creating an industrial hub.
Notification Required: Yes
Notifications Sent: 1
Responses in Favor: 0
Responses in Opposition: 1
Analysis:
In order to approve this zone change request, the Planning Commission members are
first required to consider the following criteria:
1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible
with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies adopted by the Planning
Commission or City Council.
2. Consistent with Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment would conflict with any portion of this Zoning Ordinance.
3. Compatible with Surrounding Area. Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject land
and is the appropriate zoning district for the land.
4. Changed Conditions. Whether and the extent to which there are changed conditions
that require an amendment.
5. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment,
including but not limited to water and air quality, noise, storm water management,
wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the practical functioning of the natural environment.
6. Community Need. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment
addresses a demonstrated community need.
4

220. 7. Development Patterns. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment
would result in a logical and orderly pattern of urban development in the community.
The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below.
The zone change request was initiated in an effort to market the properties to various
industrial opportunities. The 89 acre tract consists of three adjacent properties zoned
Light Manufacturing (ML), and are part of the City’s Business and Industrial Center –
located in the northeast part of town. Generally speaking, the proposal for Heavy
Manufacturing (MH) will allow for the most intense and noxious possible within the city
limits. Given the extreme nature of allowed uses, careful consideration was given in
formulating this recommendation. The Vision Plan envisions the subject property, and
areas to the north, east and west to remain 'industrial'. Industrial allows for clustering
potentially hazardous industries into limited, isolated parts of the city. Although portions
to the south calls for neighborhood development, no residences currently exist along
FM 280 or anywhere within 3/4 of a mile of the site. This particular property is isolated
from the surrounding area through the large tracts of land in the area. Loud noises and
the occasional odd smells that may potentially be emitted from property are not likely to
bother neighboring properties, given their distance from the site. After carefully
assessing the factors to the proposal for a zone change, staff has determined that such
a location would be appropriate for intense uses, for this and other reasons articulated
below.
A zone change from ML to MH is an appropriate transition given the location of the site.
In some respect, the two zoning districts are similar in terms of allowed uses. One
exception is that MH provides opportunities for heavy processing and manufacturing
that is inherently noxious and dangerous due to the chemicals or processes involved.
Other uses allowed in MH zoning include warehouse and freight movement, wholesale
trade, heavy manufacturing and production and fabrication of wearing apparel including
boots and shoes, and mining and waste-related uses as conditional uses. Since the site
is several miles from populated areas, noxious sounds and odors will likely go unnoticed
by a vast majority of people who visit and live within San Angelo.
This request for MH zoning is compatible with much of the surrounding area. The land
surrounding the site remains largely undeveloped and varies from open plains to a mix
of light to heavy brush. Two noticeable nearby structures are Angelo Achieves, which
occupies the property directly to the north, and a vacant distribution center at the
intersection of North Loop 306 Frontage and Venture Drive. In November 2012, City
Council approved a request for a "Major Entertainment Event" to temporarily develop a
tract on the properties immediately north of the subject property, for the Lucas Oil Track.
No other structures exist within 1/2 a mile of the site. The fact that the site is in one of
the most isolated and undeveloped areas allows COSADC opportunities to develop the
site for the most intensive uses, with the least potential impacts.
5

221. As referenced above, ML and MH zoning districts are very similar. The exception is that
MH zoning allows for greater flexibility in the intent as it relates to intensity and the level
of noxious uses allowed. Heavy manufacturing and production, for example, is allowed
in MH zoning. In ML districts, no vibrations can be produced which are transmitted
through the ground at any point beyond the lot line. There are also measures to reduce
noise and emission of airborne particles. Conceivably, with a more intense MH zoning,
these uses would be allowed, subject to applicable state and federal environmental
regulations in regards to environmental quality.
Depending on the intensity of the use, the transition may have an effect on the natural
environment. Staff believes that efforts to cluster these high intense uses into a few
isolated areas follows the goal of the Comprehensive Plan, and diminishes potential for
any unforeseen negative impacts. A zoning of this intensity would not normally be
appropriate near areas identified as ‘Neighborhood’ but it has, for some time, been
planned and dedicated for intense industrial uses (for many of the reasons mentioned
above), staffs feels the proposed zoning is appropriate. The site measures over 2,300
feet from any significant water feature – the nearest is the Concho River, which flow
west to east into the O.H. Ivie Reservoir (away from the city). Due to isolation of this
property and the area in general, staff is confident that there will be a suitable buffer
from residential development.
The community needs zoning districts that are this intense in nature to be isolated from
residences and highly trafficked areas. Few people will ever see the outdoor storage
that is possible in this zoning district, and those who are subjected to it are not
residences but rather industrial users of property themselves. The Comprehensive Plan
seeks to buffer residences from the tendency of industry to have outdoor storage of
materials and goods. The request is consistent with aspects of the Vision Plan and as
such, will not require amendment to the plan.
In the manufacturing and production field, materials and freight need quick access to
highways for transport to other locations. There are not many areas in the city that are
isolated from residences and that provide for quick access to a highway, which is vital in
the manufacturing field. North Loop 306, a freeway, measures less than 1/3 of a mile, to
the west of the site. Still, given its short distance from the Loop – it is somewhat
removed from the thoroughfare (separated by a 55 acre tract zoned for ML) and is an
ideal fit for the most noxious of uses, which shields potential effects from passing
motorists along the freeway. The request also offers a nice transition of permissible
uses (ML zoning between the highway and the proposed MH district), in that regard.
The property is near the edge of the city-limits – positioned nearly 2,000 feet to the east
of the boundary – which allows for easy access to routes that led outside of the city.
Quick access to the highway system, while not abutting highly trafficked residential or
commercial thoroughfares, makes this one of the safest locations within the city limits to
locate heavy industries.
6

222. Proposed Conditions
N/A
Attachments: Excerpt from zoning map, showing the general location within
the City of San Angelo;
Excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property;
Aerial photo, highlighting subject property;
Excerpt from the comprehensive plan vision map highlighting
the subject property;
Excerpt of the favor/opposition notification map;
Citizen Response;
Draft minutes from 02/18/13 Planning Commission meeting;
and
Draft Ordinance.
Presentation: Kevin Boyd, Planner
Reviewed by: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner (02/11/13)
7

224. 9

225. 10

226. 11

227. 12

229. D. Z 13-06: City of San Angelo Development Corporation
A request for approval of a zone change from Light Manufacturing (ML) to Heavy
Manufacturing (MH) to allow for activities allowed within MH zoning districts, on
the following property:
1020, 1030, & 1040 Gateway Drive, located east of the intersection of Gateway
Drive and FM 380; more specially occupying the Gateway Addition, Section 1,
Block 3, Lots 1 and 2 and Tract A, in Section 1 being a 20.059 acres, in northeast
San Angelo.
Kevin Boyd, Planner, came forward to present this request, consistent with the staff
recommendation of approval. One notification was required to be sent, and one was
received in opposition to the request. Mr. Boyd described the subject property and
its general location in the city. Mr. Boyd explained that the rquest complies with the
Vision Plan Map, which calls for "Industrial" at this location. The Economic
Development Staff, working as representatives for the San Angelo Development
Corporation, made this request because they are looking to diversify the offerings of
the Industrial Park. MH zoning is very similar to the current ML zoning, but the
section being considered for this change is very remote (not highway frontage), and
allows more flexibility and higher intensity. This is one of the most isolated and
undeveloped parts of the city, and it would allow opportunities to develop as
originally intended, far removed from neighborhoods and commercial corridors. Mr.
Boyd explained that another rationale for approval is the fact that the property being
proposed is not within the direct line of site
Bob Schneeman, the Interim Director of Economic Development, came forward to
speak in favor of this request. The infrastructure improvements in this area were
done in 2004, but little interest has so far been seen for developing the area. The
influx of oilfield-related activity prompted Economic Development and COSADC to
re-examine the allowed uses at this site in order to better bring activity to it - as
initially intended. There are a significant amount of deed restrictions on the property
in addition to the zoning. Those could not be changed without approval of the
property owners, and there is a design committee that oversees all development
within the Industrial Park. They are willing to work with the property owner who
wrote in as opposition, to skirt their property and to site operations appropriately.
There has been interest from some businesses about locating in this park. Mr.
Schneeman also expressed that there is some natural buffering due to a rather large
drainage easement that would prohibit buildings to be placed within it. In addition,
there are plans for a street to be extended to the east, which would also create a
buffer to the owner in opposition. As such, mitigation of negative impacts should be
greatly reduced as opposed to most properties. Mr. Schneeman outlined some of
the deed restrictions that are in place, prohibiting things such as feed lots, rendering
plants, height restrictions (cell towers, for example), among other things.
There was some additional discussion of the potential uses allowed in MH districts
and the specific use standards of ML districts that are different from MH district
regulations. There was also a question of utilizing a "buffer zone" for this business,

230. but staff reminded the Commission that zoning changes cannot carry conditions with
them.
There were several questions asked of staff regarding the potential for future uses at
this location.
John Dugan, with the Chamber of Commerce, came forward to speak in favor of this
request, stating that there were several types of interests in this location that would
not work under the current zoning. This would make the property more attractive.
No one else came forward to speak in favor of this request.
HR Wardlaw came forward to speak in opposition to this request, stating that the
neighbor in this area needed to be "made whole" and that endangering this particular
property owner was not the correct approach. He also stated that the original intent
of the park was to function as an office park. He asked the Commission to keep the
zoning as it is today.
Bill Wynne stated that the nearby business's issues could potentially be handled via
an air conditioning system. Jennifer Boggs discussed that the discussions about the
potential legal ramifications (privately) were not the responsibility of the Commission
members to oversee and handle/enforce. Joe Grimes explained that the Chamber,
COSADC, Eco Dev, exist to bring in revenue to the city and market it in a way that
brings industry into town rather than pushing it out into Tom Green County. Bill
Lawrence considered the fact that, to have this industry somewhere in San Angelo, it
should be considered where the most appropriate place is in the city. Bill Lawrence
also suggested that replatting could change the boundaries, and staff agreed that it
would, but that it would have to precede any change of zoning.
Motion, to approve, was made by Bill Wynne and seconded by Joe Grimes. The
motion passed by a motion of 4-1, with Darlene Jones in opposition to the change.

231. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF
CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A
ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY
CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING
PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1020, 1030, & 1040 Gateway Drive, located east of the
intersection of Gateway Drive and FM 380; more specially occupying the
Gateway Addition, Section 1, Block 3, Lots 1 and 2 and Tract A, in Section 1
being a 20.059 acres, in northeast San Angelo, changing the zoning
classification from Light Manufacturing (ML) to Heavy Manufacturing (MH)
District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
RE: Z 13-06: City of San Angelo Development Corporation
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governing
body for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law with
reference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publication
and otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property
owners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area and
in the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set out
herein; NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:
SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enacted
by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within
Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is
hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally
and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 1020,
1030, & 1040 Gateway Drive, located east of the intersection of Gateway Drive and FM
380; more specially occupying the Gateway Addition, Section 1, Block 3, Lots 1 and 2
and Tract A, in Section 1 being a 20.059 acres, in northeast San Angelo, shall
henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Heavy Manufacturing (MH) District.
The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of the
Director of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning.
SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove described
property shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code of
Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended.
SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment:

232. SEVERABILITY:
The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that,
if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not
affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.
SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment:
PENALTY:
Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in
Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of
such violation shall constitute a separate offense.
INTRODUCED on the 5th day of March, 2013 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND
ADOPTED on this the 19th day of March, 2013.
THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO
____________________________________
Alvin New, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
Approved As To Content: Approved As To Form:
_________________________ ________________________
AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

233. City of San
Angelo
Memo
Meeting Date: February 20, 2013
To: City Council members
From: Roxanne Johnston, Planner
Subject: Z 13-07: COSA Planning
A request for approval of a zone change from a Planned
Development (PD) zoning district to Single-Family
Residential (RS-1) to specifically allow for “Household
Living” as defined in Section 310 of the Zoning Ordinance on
the following property:
Location: An unaddressed tract of land located at the southwest end
of Twin Mountain Drive. This property specifically occupies
approximately 24 acres of the G. Maurer Survey 0182,
Abstract 1649, west of Sections One-A and One-B of The
Homestead, in southwest San Angelo.
Purpose: Approval of this request would zone the property RS-1
Contacts: Roxanne Johnston, Planner 325-657-4210
Caption: First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an
Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning
Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo
Z 13-07: COSA Planning
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A”
OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN
ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF
CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE
DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE

234. WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE
ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING
PROPERTY, TO WIT: An unaddressed tract of land
located at the southwest end of Twin Mountain Drive.
This property specifically occupies approximately 24
acres of the G. Maurer Survey 0182, Abstract 1649, west
of Sections One-A and One-B of The Homestead, in
southwest San Angelo, changing the zoning
classification from a Planned Development (PD) to a
Single Family Residential (RS-1) District; PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
Summary: The City Council may:
(1) Approve this zone change request from PD to RS-1 which would allow for
“Household Living” as allowed in RS-1 zoning districts; or
(2) Remand the application back to Planning Commission for further discussion,
in which case another public hearing will need to be scheduled; or
(3) Deny this zoning request from PD to RS-1.
Recommendation: Planning staff recommends approving the proposed
Zone Change.
On February 18, 2013, the Planning Commission recommended approval of
this request by a unanimous vote of 5-0.
History and Background:
PD 06-01 was approved by City Council on June 20, 2006, which
encompassed this property and others that have since been rezoned to
RS-1 on January 17, 2012 (cases Z11-23 & Z11-24). This Planned
Development called for several community areas and single family
residences that must generally conform to an RS-1 (Single Family
Residential) District. The original developer of this PD has since gone out
of business and the property has reverted back to the bank and then was
recently sold to a private buyer.
The subject property is the last remaining section of this Planned
Development District. Originally, a clubhouse, pool, and other private
amenities were proposed to go along with the 118 single family home
sites within this area and even more sites beyond. The intent was for it to
function as a gated community. Once the developer went through the

235. bankruptcy process, First Financial Bank took control of the properties in
this area which had been under that developer's ownership. In December
of 2011 the Planning Commission approved a zone change on adjacent
properties making up this Planned Development, resulting in a Single
Family Residential (RS-1) zoning district.
The bank did not wish to pursue a clubhouse and other amenities on the
subject property and the homeowners association is defunct, so staff
believes a RS-1 zoning classification gives future developers the best
opportunity to make use of the property at the highest and best use.
General Information
Existing Zoning: Planned Development (PD)
Existing Land Use: Vacant property
Surrounding Zoning/Land Use:
North: RM-1 undeveloped property
West: R & E; undeveloped property
County
South: R&E undeveloped property
East: RS-1 undeveloped property, vacant lots
& residences
Thoroughfares/Streets: Twin Mountain Drive is defined as an
“arterial” street which is designed to
connect collector streets to freeways and
carries large volumes of traffic at high
speeds. Access is secondary and mobility
is the prime function of these streets.
Zoning History: The area was annexed into the City in April
of 2006. PD 06-01 was established June
20, 2006. This land was previously zoned
Ranch & Estate (R & E).
Applicable Regulations: Section 212.A.2.d.
“An application for an amendment of the
Official Zoning Map…shall only be filed by…
the Planning Director, acting in his/her
capacity as technical advisor to the Planning
Commission.”
Development Standards: Zoning Ordinance Section 501.A.
Minimum Lot Area – 5,000 sq ft

236. Minimum Lot Dimensions – 50x100
Minimum Front Yard – 25 ft
Minimum Side Yard – 5 ft
Minimum Rear Yard – 20 ft
Maximum Floor Area Ratio – 0.4 (40%)
Maximum Height – 35 ft
Vision Plan Map: Neighborhood
Special Information
Traffic Concerns: There are currently no traffic concerns as
this area has not been developed and has
no “local” streets. Twin Mountain Drive
currently ends at the northeast section of
the subject property. Once the northern
section of the property is developed, Twin
Mountain Drive is projected to lie along the
northern boundary of the subject property
and will be an arterial which will connect
with Sherwood Way to the northwest.
The impact of future local streets will be
determined as the area is subdivided and
plans are submitted to the Planning
Division for approval. The property
experiences a variety of terrain, elevation,
and washes that will certainly be impacted
by any development.
Parking Requirements: Zoning Ordinance Section 511.B.
Two off-street parking spaces are required
for each single-family residence.
Section 511.D.1.
“All required off-street parking spaces shall
be located on the same lot or tract of land as
the building and/or activity they are intended
to serve”
Section 511.F.3.
“All areas used for required off-street parking
shall be paved”
Density: The property is currently undeveloped with
no internal street access. Low density
residential property lies to the north and east.
Notification Required: Yes

237. Notifications Sent: 13
Responses in Favor: 2
Responses in Opposition: 0
Analysis:
In order to approve this Zone change request, City Council members are first
required to consider the following criteria:
1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible
with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies adopted by the Planning
Commission or City Council.
2. Consistent with Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment would conflict with any portion of this Zoning Ordinance.
3. Compatible with Surrounding Area. Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject land
and is the appropriate zoning district for the land.
4. Changed Conditions. Whether and the extent to which there are changed conditions
that require an amendment.
5. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which the proposed
amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment,
including but not limited to water and air quality, noise, storm water management, wildlife,
vegetation, wetlands and the practical functioning of the natural environment.
6. Community Need. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment
addresses a demonstrated community need.
7. Development Patterns. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment
would result in a logical and orderly pattern of urban development in the community.
The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below.
Given the history of this property stated above whereby the original
developer went out of business, a zone change to Single Family
Residential would better fall in line with the plans, policies and Zoning
Ordinance adopted by the Planning Commission and City Council. There
are several reasons for this to hold true.
To begin with, there is currently no financial backing to ensure the
development of the several community buildings and open spaces

238. originally planned for in the Planned Development (PD) would occur.
Either way, the development standards for both categories of residential
zoning (PD and RS-1) are very similar. Section 306.B.2 of the Zoning
Ordinance states, ”It is intended that PD Districts conform as closely as
possible to established zoning and subdivision regulations…” Both zoning
districts (the PD currently in place and the proposed RS-1rezone) require
the same setback and height requirements as well as signage,
landscaping and off-street parking.
By doing nothing to the zoning, the property is not as consistent with
surrounding zoning as it would be if it were rezoned to RS-1. Future
developers may have a hard time developing since this is currently a
remnant from the original PD.
A requirement of any PD is that the original plans approved as a condition
of the PD be adhered to and any changes would require a review. Section
210.H.1 of the Zoning Ordinance states, “No building permit may be
issued and no construction or development requiring a building permit and
situated within a PD District may commence unless a site plan has been
approved for that phase of the project that is consistent with the approved
concept plan. A site plan that is not consistent with the approved concept
plan and specific PD District ordinance shall not be approved.” These
statements illustrates that conditions of the PD must be met. This is
virtually impossible now given the changed circumstances now that the
PD no longer exists in its entirety, so current zoning creates a special
circumstance that could keep the area from developing and could make
land transactions less attractive to prospective buyers who would want to
create their own plans. These developers may not wish to contribute to the
required common areas as originally envisioned when the development
was first conceived.
Staff feels that a zone change would continue to be in line with the
Comprehensive Plan’s Vision map which calls for neighborhood in this
area. Additionally, staff feels that a zone change continues to address
community need, as it does under the current zoning, for creating
residential opportunities here. As such, an amendment to the Vision Plan
would not be required with this particular request.
Although the original PD plan encompassed a large section beyond the
subject property, it theoretically would have ensured more consistency
with regard to building, street, and general layout design and design
concepts than a usual RS-1 zone would. As previously mentioned, the
development standards would not change as a result of a zone change.
Therefore, one could argue that there can now be a mix of development
concepts in the area which could allow for more diverse home stock. So
far the development that has occurred since the recent zone changes to

239. surrounding the property has yielded in thoughtful and consistent
development patterns, which is what the Zoning Ordinance seeks to
create.
It is possible, too, that new development patterns on the subject property
could actually result in fewer residential lots than originally planned. For
example, it is conceivable that a land-owner of the subject property would
wish to keep the property in its natural state. Again, any development
occurring within the proposed zoning district would be required to adhere
to RS-1 development standards, so there is no chance of over-developing
the subject property. This would also ensure consistent development
patterns as directed in Criteria 7. Furthermore, Criteria 2 would be met
because an amendment here would be consistent with the Zoning
Ordinance. It would also be compatible with surrounding zoning and
therefore meets the objective of Criteria 3.
In addressing environmental impacts resulting from this rezoning; second
only to Ranch & Estate zoning districts (R&E), RS-1 creates the least use
demand on the property. Whereas no heavier use zoning is planned for
this area in the Vision Plan, any development or future subdivisions will
most likely be reviewed by the City to ensure that environmental impacts
are minimized. Also, until plans are made for the vacant property, it would
not be possible to forecast the direct environmental impacts on this
property that enjoys a variety of open space, gullies and topographic
changes. With either zoning (PD or RS-1), this uncertainty would remain
the same.
To summarize, staff feels a zone change from PD to RS-1 on the subject
property meets with all of the above criteria which include conformity with
the Zoning Ordinance, plans and policies, compatibility with the
surrounding area, and corrects changed conditions that resulted from the
end of the original PD agreements. This proposal also does not create
additional adverse impacts on the property than would the PD, it meets a
community need by not requiring surrounding property owners to pay for
the amenities and Homeowner’s Association fees set forth in the original
PD plan, and ensures logical and consistent development patterns to
protect the area from over development. Lastly, a zone change will most
likely result in a logical and consistent pattern of residential development.
Attachments: excerpt from zoning map, showing the general location
within the City of San Angelo;
excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject
property;

240. aerial photo, highlighting subject property;
excerpt from the Comprehensive Plan Vision map
highlighting the subject property;
original PD concept plan;
notification map highlighting responses from
neighboring properties;
citizen response letters;
draft minutes from February 18, 2013 Planning
Commission meeting; and,
draft Ordinance.
Presentation: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager
Reviewed by: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner (02/11/13)

249. MINUTE RECORD OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
HELD ON MONDAY, February 18, 2013 AT 9:00 AM IN THE SOUTH MEETING ROOM OF
THE SAN ANGELO CONVENTION CENTER, 500 RIO CONCHO DRIVE, SAN ANGELO,
TEXAS
PRESENT: Joe Grimes, Bill Lawrence, Jennifer Boggs, Darlene Jones, Bill Wynne
ABSENT: Sebastian Guerrero (AE), Sam Tambunga (AE)
STAFF: AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services
Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner
Kevin Boyd, Planner
Roxanne Johnston, Planner
C. Z 13-07: COSA Planning
A request for approval of a zone change from a Planned Development (PD)
zoning district to Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to specifically allow for
“Household Living” as defined in Section 310 of the Zoning Ordinance on the
following property:
An unaddressed tract of land located at the southwest end of Twin Mountain
Drive. This property specifically occupies approximately 24 acres of the G.
Maurer Survey 0182, Abstract 1649, west of Sections One-A and One-B of The
Homestead, in southwest San Angelo.
Roxanne Johnston, Planner, came forward to present this request, consistent with
the staff recommendation of approval. 13 notifications were sent out on this
request, 3 of which were returned in favor. There were no notifications returned in
opposition to this request. Ms. Johnston gave some background on the area. Ms.
Johnston explained that there is one remaining piece of this PD that remains in this
area. The original plan called for a gated community, an HOA, and additional
community amenities. Ms. Johnston explained the complications for each individual
lot and individual owner, due to these requirements. This change has taken place
throughout the other two pieces of the original PD district, and this would simply be
the last piece, restoring all of the area to an RS-1 district, which is consistent with
the Vision Plan Map category of "Neighborhood". The proposal is in line with
development of the area, and activity in this area (by single, individual property
owners, not an HOA) is increasing. All development must adhere to RS-1
development standards, so it would be consistent with the surrounding
neighborhoods in the same general vicinity.
There were no questions.
No one came forward to speak in favor of this request. No one came forward to
speak in opposition of this request.
Motion, to approve as presented, was made by Jennifer Boggs and seconded by
Bill Wynne. The motion passed unanimously, 5-0.

250. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF
CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A
ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY
CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING
PROPERTY, TO WIT: An unaddressed tract of land located at the southwest
end of Twin Mountain Drive. This property specifically occupies
approximately 24 acres of the G. Maurer Survey 0182, Abstract 1649, west
of Sections One-A and One-B of The Homestead, in southwest San Angelo,
changing the zoning classification from a Planned Development (PD) to a
Single Family Residential (RS-1) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
RE: Z 13-07: COSA Planning
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governing
body for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law with
reference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publication
and otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property
owners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area and
in the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set out
herein; NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:
SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enacted
by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within
Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is
hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally
and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: An
unaddressed tract of land located at the southwest end of Twin Mountain Drive. This
property specifically occupies approximately 24 acres of the G. Maurer Survey 0182,
Abstract 1649, west of Sections One-A and One-B of The Homestead, in southwest San
Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a Planned Development (PD) to a Single
Family Residential (RS-1) District;, shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows:
Single Family Residential (RS-1) District.
The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of the
Director of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning.
SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove described
property shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code of
Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended.
SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment:

251. SEVERABILITY:
The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that,
if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not
affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.
SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment:
PENALTY:
Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in
Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of
such violation shall constitute a separate offense.
INTRODUCED on the 5th day of March, 2013 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND
ADOPTED on this the 19th day of March, 2013.
THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO
____________________________________
Alvin New, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
Approved As To Content: Approved As To Form:
_________________________ ________________________
AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

252. City of San Angelo
Office of the City Clerk
Memo
Date: February 13, 2013
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
Subject:
th
Agenda Item for March 5 Council Meeting
Contact: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk, 657-4405
Caption: Regular Item
First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance amending
established boundaries of Single Member District 1
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO,
TEXAS AMENDING THE ESTABLISHED BOUNDARIES OF SINGLE
MEMBER DISTRICT NUMBER 1 FOR THE PURPOSE OF INCORPORATING
NEWLY ANNEXED AREAS INTO SAID DISTRICT, PROVIDING FOR
PRECLEARANCE AND ALL OTHER NECESSARY ACTIONS; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE
Summary: The City Council adopted two ordinances incorporating newly annexed areas in
SMD 1.
a. The public hearings were held on January 22, 2013 and February 5, 2013 and adopted an
ordinance on February 5, 2013. The area annexed is 20 acres located west/southwest of
the city at about the southern corner of the intersection of U.S. Highway 67 (Sherwood Way)
and a southward projection of Appaloosa Trail, adjacent and contiguous to the present
corporate limits of the city. The area is uninhabited and situated adjacent to an apartment
development currently undergoing construction.
b. The public hearings were held on February 5, 2013 and March 5, 2013 and adopted an
ordinance on March 5, 2013. The area annex is 8.995 acres located west/southwest of the
city at about northwest of mills pass drive, east of Community of Faith subdivision and
southwest of Sam’s Club addition, adjacent and contiguous to the present corporate limits of
the city. The area is uninhabited and situated adjacent to a growing residential subdivision.
As part of the submission under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, the annexations update and
change to the established boundaries of single member districts shall be cleared through the
Department of Justice. Both areas are uninhabited.
The City will comply with all necessary requirements for the submission by adoption of this ordinance.
Financial Impact: None.
Other Information/Recommendation: Staff recommends updating the established boundary of
SMD #1.
Attachments: Annexation Map A and B, Proposed Ordinance, and Revised 2013 SMD Map
 Page 1

258. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS AMENDING THE
ESTABLISHED BOUNDARIES OF SINGLE MEMBER
DISTRICT NUMBER 1 FOR THE PURPOSE OF
INCORPORATING NEWLY ANNEXED AREAS INTO
SAID DISTRICT, PROVIDING FOR PRECLEARANCE
AND ALL OTHER NECESSARY ACTIONS; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo is a Home Rule municipal corporation operating
under a municipal charter that has been adopted as authorized by Article XI, Section 5 of
the Texas Constitution; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the City of San Angelo Charter, Section 3 entitled “Annexation”,
the City Council shall have the power, after public hearing, of fixing the boundaries of the
City of San Angelo and to annex additional territory by ordinance; and
WHEREAS, on February 5, 2013 and March 5, 2013, the City Council adopted
Ordinances #2013-02-021 and #2013-03-034, annexing certain uninhabited areas into
the City of San Angelo; and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary to incorporate such areas into a Single Member District
within the City of San Angelo in order to ensure future new residents of the right to vote;
and
WHEREAS, changes in single member districts constitute a change from prior practices
requiring preclearance under the Federal Voting Rights Act.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:
SECTION 1: RECITALS INCORPORATED. The recitals set forth above are incorporated
into the body of this Resolution as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.
SECTION 2: DESIGNATION OF ESTABLISHED BOUNDARIES: The boundaries of
Single Member District 1 be, and are hereby, amended as set forth in Exhibit “A”,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
SECTION 3: SUBMISSIONS TO THE UNITED STATES JUSTICE DEPARTMENT: The
City Clerk of the City of San Angelo, or her authorized agent, shall make such
submissions as are necessary to the United State Justice Department to seek pre-
clearance approval.
SECTION 4: NECESSARY ACTIONS: The Mayor and the City Clerk, in consultation
with the City Attorney, are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all actions
necessary or appropriate to comply with the provisions of the San Angelo Code of
Ordinances, the Texas Election Code and any other Texas State or federal law in
carrying out and designating established single member district boundaries for District 1,
as amended, whether or not expressly authorized herein and all such actions of City
officials previously taken for said purposes are hereby ratified.

259. SECTION 5: SEVERABILITY: The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be
deemed to be severable in that if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be
invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.
SECTION 6: EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective from and after
adoption of this ordinance.
INTRODUCED on the 5th day of March, 2013, and finally PASSED, APPROVED and
ADOPTED on this the 19th day of March, 2013.
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS
_________________________
Alvin New, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
Approved as to Content: Approved as to Form:
_________________________ __________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

260. EXHIBIT “A”
DESCRIPTION OF SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT 1
FOR SAN ANGELO, TEXAS
BY 2010 U. S. CENSUS P. L. 94-171 TRACT AND BLOCK
TRACT / BLOCK TRACT / BLOCK TRACT / BLOCK
001304 4008 001706 1034 001101 1098
001303 5006 001706 1023 001101 1099
001303 1004 001706 1037 001301 7006
001304 4003 001706 1020 001707 1015
001101 1075 001704 2187 001704 2182
001101 1025 001101 1087 001101 2002
001304 2000 001101 1046 001303 1008
001101 1114 001101 1065 001200 6038
001101 1084 001706 1038 001101 1081
001101 1097 001707 1002 001101 1092
001101 1053 001101 2008 001707 2029
001101 1104 001301 6003 001101 1064
001101 1041 001101 1089 001301 7007
001707 1044 001101 1095 001707 1008
001707 2039 001101 1096 001301 7002
001101 1045 001101 3004 001101 1112
001101 1027 001101 2004 001101 1060
001101 1036 001200 6039 001101 2009
001303 3005 001303 3006 001101 2001
001707 1011 001301 7014 001301 7000
001707 1026 001101 1109 001304 1000
001707 1043 001707 2016 001101 1011
001707 1010 001706 1011 001101 1009
001706 1030 001706 1018 001101 3002
001304 2005 001706 1041 001101 1023
001303 3003 001706 1019 001707 1034
001303 2005 001707 2037 001101 1103
001303 3008 001101 1010 001303 2008
001303 2001 001304 1005 001303 3010
001303 5005 001707 2038 001101 1115
001303 5002 001707 1001 001101 2007
001304 4007 001707 1012 001101 2000
001707 1021 001101 1069 001101 1091
001707 2023 001101 1068 001101 1111
001707 1042 001101 1118 001303 4002
001707 1032 001101 1078 001101 1090
001706 1014 001303 1010 001303 2003

261. 001303 2006 001707 2019 001304 1009
001303 4005 001303 1005 001101 1048
001303 1001 001303 4009 001101 1116
001704 1095 001707 2015 001101 1049
001707 1033 001707 2013 001707 2033
001707 1028 001101 1074 001707 2034
001706 1027 001707 2026 001704 2179
001706 1032 001303 3001 001707 1000
001707 1018 001304 4005 001707 1013
001707 1016 001101 1035 001706 1001
001303 1000 001707 1005 001101 1108
001303 2012 001707 1031 001303 5001
001101 1083 001706 1016 001303 3012
001303 3009 001706 1025 001303 4008
001303 1003 001706 1033 001303 4003
001303 2011 001704 2180 001303 4000
001303 2002 001301 7013 001101 1042
001303 2007 001301 7003 001304 2001
001303 1002 001101 1038 001704 1079
001707 2031 001101 1101 001704 1115
001101 1055 001101 1088 001707 1003
001707 1006 001304 2002 001707 1030
001706 1008 001706 1028 001706 1007
001707 1017 001707 2014 001706 1009
001101 1086 001304 4000 001706 1022
001101 1082 001707 2011 001706 1040
001101 1113 001707 2028 001707 2021
001101 1057 001101 1061 001101 1026
001704 2000 001707 2032 001101 1117
001101 3001 001704 2184 001304 4002
001303 1006 001101 3003 001704 2186
001303 1007 001101 2006 001303 5008
001304 2004 001101 2005 001303 4004
001304 4006 001101 2003 001303 4010
001707 1038 001101 1100 001704 2181
001706 1013 001101 1106 001704 2185
001706 1042 001303 2004 001706 1003
001303 5009 001707 1027 001707 2018
001303 2009 001704 2001 001101 1059
001706 1002 001707 2025 001101 1105
001707 1009 001303 1009 001101 1058
001706 1029 001304 4001 001303 4006
001707 1039 001301 7005 001304 1006
001706 1026 001704 2183 001304 1008
001706 2002 001101 3000 001707 1040

262. 001303 5004 001101 3006
001304 4004 001303 2010
001707 2012 001704 1068
001707 1037 001706 1004
001707 1035 001707 1014
001704 1094 001101 1093
001706 1006 001101 1071
001706 1010 001101 1070
001707 1022 001101 1056
001707 1024 001303 3013
001706 1031 001101 1063
001707 1036 001707 1007
001706 1012 001707 1029
001706 1015 001707 1025
001101 1024 001707 2017
001101 1054 001706 1017
001707 1020 001706 1021
001101 1077 001706 1036
001101 1067 001704 1096
001101 1110 001707 2022
001303 3007 001706 1035
001304 2003 001101 1047
001707 1019 001707 1004
001301 7004 001707 1023
001101 1076 001101 1066
001101 1050 001101 1079
001101 1051 001101 1080
001303 3011 001101 1072
001303 3000 001707 2036
001101 3005 001707 2020
001303 3002 001707 2010
001101 1094 001303 3004
001101 1107 001303 4001
001303 4011 001303 2000
001303 5000 001303 5007
001303 5003 001101 1085
001303 4007 001101 1073
001706 1024 001101 1044
001706 1000
001707 2027
001706 1039
001707 2009
001706 1005
001101 1102

263. City of San Angelo
Memo
Date: March 6, 2013
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Ricky Dickson, Interim Water Utilities Director
Subject: Agenda Item for March 19, 2013 Council Meeting
Contact: Ricky Dickson, Water Utilities Director, 657-4209
Caption: Update on the design and construction activities for the Hickory Water Supply Project
Summary: Hutch Musallam with Carollo Engineers will give an update on the status of the
Hickory Water Supply projects currently under design and the projects currently in construction.
History: Construction on the first Hickory project began in the Fall of 2011 with the Well
Field Pipelines project. This project has since been completed and two other projects are
currently under construction. The projects under construction are the 30” Transmission Main and
the Booster Pump Station and Well Field Improvements. Projects currently in the design phase
are the Groundwater Treatment Facility and drilling of new wells for the expansion of the well
field. Planned projects will include equipping the new wells, extension of well field collector
mains, extension of power lines to the new wells, construction of well access roads and
installation of an additional pump in the booster pump station.
Financial Impact: N/A
Other Information/Recommendation: N/A
Attachments: Presentation
Presentation: Project update by Hutch Musallam, Carollo Engineers.
Publication: None.
Reviewed by Service Area Director: Ricky Dickson, Water Utilities Director, March 6, 2013.

264. Progress Report
San Angelo City Council
March 19, 2013
Agenda
1. Progress & Schedule Update:
a. Transmission M i
T i i Main
b. Booster Pump Station & Well Field
c. Treatment
d. New Groundwater Wells
2.
2 Questions Disc ssion
Q estions & Discussion
2
1

265. Transmission Main
 NTP January 23, 2012
 Substantial Completion: July 16, 2013
 Final Completion: September 14, 2013
 Current status: Dig-Lay-Bury is approximately
80% complete
3
Progress As of March 4, 2013
4
2

266. Progress Summary
 3rd dig-lay-bury crew added through March 14,
2013 to expedite production i BCV areas b f
t dit d ti in before
nesting season.
 Work progressing in both directions
 Valves and appurtenance work ongoing with dig-
lay-bury
l b
 Pressure testing starting soon
5
Laying Pipe in Rock
6
3

267. Gate Valve Installation
7
Booster Pump Station & Well Field
 NTP: June 18, 2012
 Substantial Completion: June 18, 2013
 Final Completion: July 17, 2013
 Current Status: Approximately 50% complete
8
4

268. Progress Summary
 Booster pump cans set, backfill underway
 Foundations for all well buildings underway most
underway,
complete
 High point and well 6 tank foundations underway.
 Well cleaning underway
 Potential delay to current schedule mainly due to
longer than expected time needed to clean and
retrofit existing wells
9
Hickory Wells 1-9 Background
 Wells drilled in the 70s
 Potential obstructions or items identified by the
initial video survey at some wells
 TCEQ required cleaning of the well casing at
each well along with the removal of debris or
obstructions noted i the i i i l video survey
b i d in h initial id
followed by a new video survey to confirm
conditions of wells
10
5

269. Conditions of Well
 Obstruction in Well 4 has been identified as a
packing plug Contractor trying drill and air purge it
plug.
out of the well.
 Obstruction removal and repairs to 3 wells
 5 holes in well 7 casing: 1 at 64 feet, 3 at 1,128 feet,
and 1 at 2,062 feet. A sleeve can be swaged in at 64
feet and possibly at 1128 feet, but not at 2062 due to
the pressure at that depth. H l at 2062 i
h h d h Hole is
completely sealed with grout.
 Well 1 liner casing slipped. Attempt will be made to
remove the slipped casing.
11
Setting block for booster pump station
electrical building
12
6

270. Booster Pump Cans
13
Looking East PS & Electrical Building
14
7

271. Underground electrical at Well 1
15
Groundwater Treatment Plant
 Groundwater Treatment Facility
 Disinfection Facility
 Associated civil work and piping
 Project Status:
• RRSS Selection and Design NTP: February 6, 2013
g y ,
• Overall final design: Anticipated completion
completion April 30, 2013
16
8

272. Site Layout
Disinfection Facility Groundwater
Treatment Facility
17
Disinfection Facility
18
9

273. Groundwater Treatment Facility
19
Groundwater Treatment Facility
Building Dimensions: 208’ – 0” x 133’ – 4”
20
10

274. Groundwater Treatment Facility
21
Disinfection Facility
Building Dimensions:
105’ – 4” x 64’ – 44”
22
11

275. Disinfection Facility
23
Post Design Key Milestones
Anticipated Dates or
Schedule
TWDB/TCEQ Review May 1, 2013 through June 30
1 30,
2013
Advertise Project May 16, 2013
Bid Project July 9, 2013
Recommendation of Award & July 9 through July 16, 2013
Council Approval
TWDB R l
Release of F d and NTP
f Funds d August 1 2013
A t 1,
Substantial Construction July 31, 2014
Completion for GWTF
Final Construction Completion of October 30, 2014
Project
24
12

276. New Wells
 Regulatory hurdle cleared and clearing, grubbing
and grinding of cleared material of new wells and
d i di f l d t i l f ll d
ROW complete.
 Phase 1: Engineering for “Drilling New Wells”
underway. Expected design completion and
submittal to TCEQ April 30 2013
30,
 Phase 2: Engineering for “Site Civil, Piping and
Equipping New Wells” will start in May 2013
25
Questions?
San Angelo City Council
March 23, 2013
13

277. City of San Angelo
Finance Department
Memo
Date: March 6, 2013
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Steve Mahaffey, Budget Analyst, Sr.
Subject: Agenda Item for March 19, 2013 Council Meeting
Contact: Steve Mahaffey, Budget Analyst, Sr. 481-2757
Caption:
st nd
Regular (1 reading) Consent (2 reading)
First public hearing and introduction of an Ordinance amending the 2012-2013 Budget
for new projects, incomplete projects, capital projects and grants.
Summary: This proposed amendment contains the following items (additional information
attached):
City of San Angelo Operating Budget
• RLSS Grant for Health Department
• Texas Historical Commission Planning/Feasibility Study Grant
• Downtown Streetscape Project
• Chase State Office Building Maintenance
History: See attached Budget Amendment Request memorandum.
Financial Impact: $490,664 (see attached detail on Exhibit A of the Ordinance)
Related Vision Item (if applicable): N/A
Other Information/Recommendation: Staff recommends approval.
Attachments: Ordinance including Exhibit A; Department request memos
Presentation: N/A
Publication: N/A
Reviewed by Service Area Director: Michael Dane, ACM/CFO

278. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AMENDING
THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER
1, 2012, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2013, FOR NEW
PROJECTS, INCOMPLETE PROJECTS, AND GRANTS.
WHEREAS the City of San Angelo has determined that new projects not included in the
current budget should begin, and
WHEREAS the City of San Angelo has determined that certain budgeted amounts should
be amended due to project changes and unforeseen circumstances, and
WHEREAS the resources necessary for these changes are available;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN ANGELO, TEXAS THAT:
The City’s budget for fiscal year 2012-2013 be amended by the amounts contained in
Exhibit A.
INTRODUCED on the 19th day of March, 2013, and APPROVED and ADOPTED on
this the 2nd day of April, 2013.
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS
__________________________________
Alvin New, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
Approved as to Content and Form:
__________________________________
Michael Dane, Assistant City Manager/CFO

279. City of San Angelo
Proposed Budget Amendment
Exhibit A
Total Total Net
Fund Revenue Expenditure Benefit/
Number Fund Name Amendment Amendment (Cost)
COSA Operating Budget
103 Intergovernmental Fund 47,380 47,380 0
General Debt Service
105 0 220,000 (220,000)
Fund
106 South TIRZ Fund 0 93,284 (93,284)
201 State Office Building Fund 0 130,000 (130,000)
Totals 47,380 490,664 (443,284)

280. City of San Angelo
Proposed Budget Amendment
Additional Information
Net Benefit/
Project/Need Source of Funding Revenue Expense (Cost)
Department of State
RLSS Grant Funds Health Services RLSS 22,402 22,402 0
Grant
Texas Historical Commission Texas Historical
24,978 24,978 0
Planning/Feasibility Study Grant Commission Grant
South TIRZ Fund-Fund
Downtown Streetscape Project 0 93,284 (93,284)
Balance
State Office Building
Chase State Office Building Maintenance 0 130,000 (130,000)
Fund - Fund Balance
General Debt Service
0 220,000 (220,000)
Fund – Fund Balance
Totals 47,380 490,664 (443,284)

285. City of San Angelo
Finance Department
Memo
Date: February 21, 2013
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Laura Brooks, Budget Analyst Sr.
Subject: Agenda Item for March 19, 2013 Council Meeting
Contact: Morgan Trainer, Finance, 325-653-6291
Caption: Regular Item
Public hearing and consideration of approving and adopting a resolution
authorizing the adoption of the 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan for the
City of San Angelo
Summary: Attached is the final proposed 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).
The City Council must conduct a public hearing on the proposed Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The
proposed CIP must be published to the internet and a public notice providing the date and time of the
public hearing published within two weeks of the CIP being posted and the CIP Transmittal Letter
reinforces the objectives of the CIP as a planning tool and not a funding mechanism.
The attached resolution is the final step to adopt the 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).
Submitted projects have been reviewed by the CIP committee.
History: Preparation of the 2013-2018 CIP began November 20, 2012 with discussion with City
Council. Budget staff provided instruction for division managers to prepare CIP projects
,
December 10, 2012. On December 20 2012, project managers submitted proposed projects. The
committee reviewed projects January 31, 2013. Public meetings were held February 7 and 12,
2013. City Council Discussed the 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) at the strategic
planning session February 26, 2013 and at the regular meeting March 5, 2013.
Financial Impact: Funding will be discussed during the FY 2013-2014 budget preparation process.
Related Vision Item (if applicable): Infrastructure and Financial Visions
Other Information/Recommendation: Staff recommendations approving the capital
improvement plan and adoption of the resolution.
Attachments: Proposed 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan, Resolution
Presentation: Powerpoint
Publication: Notice of this Public Hearing was posted on the website.
Reviewed by Service Area Director: Michael Dane, Assistant City Manager/CFO
 Page 1

286. City of
San Angelo
2013-2018
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PLAN

288. 2013-2018
Capital
Improvement
Plan
City Council
Alvin New, Mayor
Paul Alexander, SMD #1 Dwain Morrison, SMD #2
Johnny Silvas, SMD #3
Kendall Hirschfeld, SMD #5 Charlotte Farmer, SMD #6
City Management
Daniel Valenzuela, City Manager
Rick Weise, Assistant City Manager for Community Services
Michael Dane, Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer
Capital projects are prepared by the staff member identified within each project sheet
Capital Improvement Plan preparation:
Morgan Trainer, Budget Manager
Laura Brooks, Senior Budget Analyst
Steven Mahaffey, Senior Budget Analyst
Introduction of the Capital Improvement Plan
February 21, 2013
Public Hearing March 5, 2013
Plan Adoption March 19, 2013

289. This page was intentionally left blank

290.
March 6, 2013
Dear Citizens,
The 2013‐2018 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is the seventh annual CIP completed by the City of San Angelo. The
citizens approved a change to the city’s charter in November 2007 to require the preparation of a CIP every year.
Overview
The plan identifies the capital needs of the city for a five‐year planning period. The CIP is updated annually to reflect
the changing needs of the community and address any new issues that impact our community.
The CIP does not appropriate funds, but supports the budget process and the appropriations made through the
adoption of the budget. An effective CIP provides for considerable advance notification, planning, evaluation, scope
definition, design, public discussion, cost estimation, and financial planning.
The objectives utilized to develop the CIP are:
 To preserve and improve the infrastructure of San Angelo;
 To identify and examine current and future infrastructure needs and minimize the financial impact on residents;
 To maximize the useful life of capital investments by scheduling major renovations and modifications at the
appropriate time in the life‐cycle of the facility;
 To improve financial planning by comparing needs with resources, and estimating future funding issues;
There are many benefits of having a CIP. First and foremost, it provides an overall perspective for the development
pattern of the city, thus enabling the citizens as well as the City Council and staff to take a long‐range view of their
future activities and responsibilities. The CIP also highlights the deficiencies of the city and stimulates action to correct
them. The plan promotes coordination of projects across City departments and across overlapping governmental
jurisdictions. It also allows City staff to more effectively budget operating expenditures each year necessary to
maintain new projects and stabilize personnel demands.
Compliance
City staff together with public input made every effort to ensure the CIP is compliant with the items mandated in the
city charter. Section 59A (attached) from the city charter defines San Angelo’s capital program. This language was truly
a cohesive effort drafted by a committee of City staff and citizens. For example the charter states the plan should be an
annual effort, outlines what content should be included, requires public hearings, and dictates how the plan should be
adopted.
The City Charter sets forth the mandatory elements of a comprehensive capital plan. Those elements include a
 A summary,
 long‐term goals of the community,
 capital improvement expenditures,
 cost estimates,
 funding source,
 estimated annual operating costs,
 how the plan sustains San Angelo,
 and performance measures.
1

291. 2

292. 3

293. This page was intentionally left blank
4

294. STRATEGIC PLANNING MEETING PRIORITIES
(FEBRUARY 26, 2013)
1. Street maintenance / restoration / illustration
a. Evaluation
i. Assess condition
ii. Plan / prioritize
iii. Fund
iv. Build
v. Maintain
vi. Continue to repeat – i. through v.
b. Street Condition Study
i. Obtain funding sources to assist with study, i.e. grants
ii. Group all streets and categorize/evaluate by useful life and level of work to be
completed: New streets, sealcoat, mill & overlay, and total reconstruct.
iii. Based on comprehensive 7 year rotation plan, determine at which level to assign a
street, including associated costs
iv. Base prioritization on assessed data and future use
v. Implement Comprehensive 7 Year Street Plan
1. Plan will decrease overall CIP cost by 1/5
vi. Work closely with Street & Bridge Department to begin maintenance program
2. Stormwater infrastructure
3. Reduce property tax rate
a. Transition subsidized projects to self funded
b. Utilize additional funds to fund one time projects, i.e. streets, police center, underground
stormwater infrastructure
c. Steady government growth related to population
d. Implemented 10 year goal to decrease property tax from 86.86% to 76%.
e. Establish a goal to decrease property tax to 70% and out of the TML Top Ten highest
property tax rate for cities over 50K population
5

295. 4. Revenue Retain/wage/maintain staffing
a. Impact of Cline Shale
i. Impact study conducted on Eagle Ford Shale (expands over 20 counties)
ii. Projecting increasing sales tax revenues and housing
iii. Potential to create 17k jobs within 7 years
iv. San Angelo experiencing increased inflationary factors
1. Must insure organization is running efficiently and directing funds to the
appropriate projects
5. Manage organization growth
a. Steady government growth related to population
i. Organization growth where necessary, i.e. public safety
6. Offset value increase with rate reduction
a. Per hotel/motel room
7. Tourism: Onetime projects
a. Wayfinding
i. Establish and implement a uniform plan
ii. Utilize HOT to fund
b. Ft. Concho
i. Established a virtual presentation and accomplish more for tourism, i.e. talking mule or
buffalo soldier.
c. Ft. Concho maintenance
i. Utilize HOT to fund infrastructure
d. Coliseum Marquee signage
i. Utilize HOT to fund infrastructure
e. Other occupancy tax projects
f. Reserve / rate stabilization
i. Establish reserve funds for major projects, including Hotel Occupancy Tax
ii. Establish rate stabilization for known future projects to provide a smooth transition, i.e.
landfill
g. Grantee accountability
i. Establish and implement performance measurements, metrics, and benchmarks
ii. Consider long term imaging, incremental increases, image building, continually raising
the bar
h. Create/pursue an image/vision
i. Exceptionalism at all levels
6

296. j. Chamber partnership
i. Establish and implement performance measurements, metrics, and benchmarks
ii. Tangible results
iii. Implement a set fee vs. percentage allocation, thereby providing static funds that can be
adjusted
k. Recruit more events, i.e. drag boat races
l. Revenue per room
i. Disclose anomalies
ii. Measure/track room rate increase impacts
8. Police Department Facility
a. Restart momentum
i. Establish a budget for facility
ii. Consider issuing bond
b. Debt capacity update
9. Economic Development
a. What to incent?
i. Establish criteria on types of business to incentivize
1. Consider preference points to qualify for incentive
ii. Put study in action
1. Continue with discipline on the big study; key points into play
iii. Assist Chamber to complete marketing plan
1. Tailor focus
b. Provide support for local/small business
i. Business Resource Center
ii. Human Resources support
iii. Technical support
c. Streamline Housing / building process
i. Expedite regulatory process
1. Make the process quicker to accommodating the customer’s needs, but still
manage staff, i.e. working overtime
ii. Permit time objectives
iii. Targeted staffing increases
iv. Time studies/objectives
v. Productivity benchmarks
d. Brownwood/3M Company Inquiry
e. Short / long term goals
i. Provide assistance to local business to speed up the process
ii. Continue with strategic plan process
iii. Continue with Chamber’s marketing plan; accountability
7

297. f. Economic diversification
i. Build existing businesses to handle low or declining economic periods
g. Sales tax equity – Online vs. Bricks & Mortar
i. Small business online sales
ii. Provide service via Business Resource Center
iii. Establish a national presence for local businesses
h. Transportation
i. Air service
ii. Regional road issues
iii. Ports to Plains
i. Re-cap report of the various projects and studies
i. Goal progress/ executive summary
1. Dashboard view
2. Requires self discipline to stay on top of these plans
a. Lake Nasworthy Study / Gateway Planning
8

298. City of San Angelo
2013‐2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Summary of Projects
Project Type Key: IN= Infrastructure; AP= Airport; COF= City Operation Facilities; CFP‐ Community Facilities & Parks; EN= Environmental Projects; EQ= Equipment; TG= Technology
Dedicated/C
Project ommitted Total Project
Type Division Project Title Project Manager Funding Proposed Funding Source 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Costs
IN Street & Bridge Mill & Overlay‐ Main Street Clinton Bailey Y General Fund 185,000 185,000
IN Street & Bridge Mill & Overlay ‐ 14th Street Clinton Bailey Y General Fund 403,000 403,000
IN Street & Bridge Mill & Overlay ‐ 19th Street Clinton Bailey Y General Fund 378,000 378,000
Reconstruction of Bell St from Concho River to Old Ballinger
IN Street & Bridge Clinton Bailey N 4,800,000 4,800,000
Hwy Undetermined
IN Street & Bridge Reconstruction of Glenna Dr. from Houston Harte to Junius St Clinton Bailey N 1,300,000 1,300,000
Undetermined
IN Street & Bridge Reconstruction of Main St. from 19th St. to 26th St. Clinton Bailey N Undetermined 1,800,000 1,800,000
IN Street & Bridge Reconstruction of MLK Blvd. from 25th St. to 29th St. Clinton Bailey N Undetermined 2,500,000 2,500,000
Reconstruction of Southwest Blvd from Sunset South to
IN Street & Bridge Clinton Bailey N 6,500,000 6,500,000
Railroad Tracks Undetermined
Reconstruction of 29th St. from Bryant Blvd. to 2018 N.
IN Street & Bridge Clinton Bailey N 2,500,000 2,500,000
Chadbourne Undetermined
Engineering
IN Sealcoat Program Clinton Bailey Y 1,800,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 4,863,000
Services General Fund
IN Stormwater Storm Water Quality Improvements Clinton Bailey N Future Stormwater Utility Fee 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 29,300,000
IN Stormwater Sunset Lake Improvements Clinton Bailey Y Stormwater Utility Fee 700,000 700,000
IN Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Ave P Clinton Bailey Y General Fund 1,300,000 2,000,000
IN Water Utilities Avenue D Water Line Replacement Robert Bluthardt Y Water Fund 75,000 25,000 25,000 125,000
IN Water Utilities Automated Meter Reading System Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 1,250,000 1,250,000 7,550,000
IN Water Utilities Clay Pipe Replacements Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 73,997,896
IN Water Utilities Collector Main Replacements Ricky Dickson Y Wastewater CIP Fund 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 23,700,000
IN Water Utilities Hickory Water Supply Development Phase I Ricky Dickson Y Water Fund/Type B Sales Tax 37,000,000 30,000,000 120,000,000
IN Water Utilities High Service Pump Station Rehab Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 3,950,000
IN Water Utilities Lift Station Improvements Ricky Dickson Y Wastewater CIP Fund 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,720,000
IN Water Utilities Nasworthy Dam Emergency Spillway Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 2,000,000 2,000,000
IN Water Utilities Nasworthy Dam Stop Log Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 750,000 750,000
IN Water Utilities Lake Nasworthy Gate Operators Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 2,216,000 3,250,000
IN Water Utilities Transmission Line Valves Replacement Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 500,000 500,000 500,000 3,650,000
IN Water Utilities Transmission Mains Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 5,100,000 5,300,000 6,000,000 6,150,000 28,190,000
Water CIP Fund, Water Fund,State
IN Water Utilities Twin Buttes Eco‐System Restoration Ricky Dickson Y 1,000,000
Soil & Water Board
IN Water Utilities Water Billing & Customer Service Office Remodeling Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 500,000 1,000,000
IN Water Utilities Water Main Replacements Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 52,761,509
IN Water Utilities Water Reclamation Plant Improvements Ricky Dickson Y Wastewater CIP Fund 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,800,000
IN Water Utilities Water Treatment Plant Equipment Improvements Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 200,000 400,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 2,200,000
IN Water Utilities Wastewater Service to Existing Developed Areas Ricky Dickson Y Wastewater CIP Fund 17,200,000
IN Traffic Operations Replace School Zone and Crosswalk Equipment Shane Kelton Y 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 158,000
Tom Green County Fee
IN Traffic Operations Sign Reflectivity Upgrade Shane Kelton Y General Fund 56,550 57,681 58,834 60,011 61,211 577,364
Level 1 Infrastructure Projects Total 60,481,550 52,050,681 15,351,834 13,028,011 8,861,211 402,808,769
AP Airport Apron Joint Seal Luis Elguezabal Y FAA Grant,PFC Fund 54,900 555,555 610,455
AP Airport Runway 3‐21 Lights & Beacon Luis Elguezabal Y FAA Grant,PFC Fund 631,889
AP Airport Airport Terminal Renovation Luis Elguezabal Y 1,110,000 1,110,000 1,110,000 600,862 6,280,241
FAA Grant,PFC Fund,Type B Sales Tax
Emergency
COF EOC HVAC Replacement Teresa Covey N 500,000 500,000
Management Undetermined
COF Fire Fire Station 4 Reconstruction Brian Dunn N General Fund C.O. 2,580,000 2,580,000
COF Fire Fire Training Facility Brian Dunn N General Fund C.O., Federal Grant 1,400,000 2,600,000
9

299. City of San Angelo
2013‐2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Summary of Projects
Project Type Key: IN= Infrastructure; AP= Airport; COF= City Operation Facilities; CFP‐ Community Facilities & Parks; EN= Environmental Projects; EQ= Equipment; TG= Technology
Dedicated/C
Project ommitted Total Project
Type Division Project Title Project Manager Funding Proposed Funding Source 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Costs
COF Fort Concho Chase State Office Building Improvements Robert Bluthardt Y State Office Building Fund 200,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 300,000
COF Police Police Boat Storage Dock Tim Vasquez N Undetermined 75,000 75,000
COF Police Mobile Command Center Storage Facility Tim Vasquez N Undetermined 60,000 60,000
COF Police Police Department Administration Building Tim Vasquez N General Fund, General Fund C.O. 25,775,000 25,910,067
CFP Civic Events Auditorium Renovation Angelica Pena Y Type B Sales Tax 2,314,197 3,750,000
CFP Civic Events Fairgrounds Livestock Barn Angelica Pena Y Type B Sales Tax 1,000,000
CFP Civic Events Coliseum Improvements Angelica Pena N Undetermined 60,000 60,000
CFP Civic Events Coliseum Roof Angelica Pena N Undetermined 545,000 545,000
CFP Civic Events Convention Center Improvements Angelica Pena N Undetermined 83,069 119,900
CFP Fort Concho Fort Concho Barracks 6 New Floor Robert Bluthardt N Undetermined 15,000 15,000
CFP Fort Concho Heating & Cooling Unit Replacements Fort Concho Robert Bluthardt N Undetermined 125,000 20,000 15,000 160,000
CFP Fort Concho Fort Concho Post Bandstand Robert Bluthardt N Undetermined 25,000 25,000
CFP Fort Concho Fort Concho Visitor Center Improvements Robert Bluthardt N Undetermined 100,000 750,000 250,000 400,000 1,500,000
CFP Fort Concho Fort Concho OQ1 Rear Room & Roof Repairs Robert Bluthardt N Undetermined 75,000 75,000
Development
CFP Wayfinding Phases I‐III A.J. Fawver N 100,000 100,000 100,000 300,000
Services Undetermined
CFP MPO Neighborhood Pedestrian Improvement Program Doray Hill, Jr. Y 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000
Transportation Grant, General Fund
CFP Real Estate/Legal Santa Fe Train Depot Improvements Cindy Preas N Undetermined 21,238 20,000 15,000 22,500 22,500 126,238
CFP Real Estate/Legal Spur Parking Garage Cindy Preas N Undetermined 1,825,000 1,825,000
CFP Parks 29th Street Complex Carl White Y Type B Sales Tax 1,650,000 1,650,000
CFP Recreation Community Aquatics Facility MaryAnn Vasquez Y Type B Sales Tax, Donation 3,262,422
CFP Recreation Recreation Center Air Conditioning MaryAnn Vasquez N Undetermined 500,000 500,000
CFP Recreation Youth Soccer Complex at Glenna St MaryAnn Vasquez Y Type B Sales Tax 270,000
CFP Parks Bradford Neighborhood & School Park Carl White Y Type B Sales Tax 175,000
CFP Parks Brentwood Park Renovation Carl White Y Type B Sales Tax 275,000 275,000
CFP Parks Brown Park Renovation Carl White Y Type B Sales Tax 175,000 175,000
CFP Parks Central Control Irrigation Carl White Y Type B Sales Tax 110,500
CFP Parks Civic League Park Improvements Carl White Y Grant, Donation 115,000 115,000
CFP Parks Fairmount Cemetery Improvements Phase I Carl White N Donation, Undetermined 600,000 600,000
CFP Parks Hilltop Trail Carl White Y 200,000 200,000
Grant, Possible Trust Fund Funding
CFP Parks Middle Concho Boat Ramp Carl White Y 471,000 471,000
Grant, Possible Trust Fund Funding
CFP Parks Red Arroyo Trail Clinton Bailey Y Grant, Type B Sales Tax, Stormwater 400,000 400,000 4,000,000
Fund, Private Donation
CDBG Funds, Type B Sales Tax,
CFP Parks Rio Vista Neighborhood Park Renovation Carl White Y 813,900
Donation
CFP Parks Rio Concho Community Park Carl White N Type B Sales Tax, Undetermined 85,000 650,000
CFP Parks Santa Rita Neighborhood Park Renovation Carl White Y Type B Sales Tax, Donation 150,000 150,000
CFP Parks South Concho Boat Ramp Carl White Y 438,600 438,600
Grant, Possible Trust Fund Funding
CFP Parks Sunken Garden Park Carl White N Undetermined 275,000 275,000
Concho River Dredging, Bank Stabilization, & Trail Type B Sales Tax, Grants, Stormwater
EN Parks Carl White Y 15,436,647
Improvements Fund
EQ Public Information Public Information Equipment Replacement Anthony Wilson N 19,874 4,668 5,378 47,856
Grant, Undetermined
TG Police Public Communications Technology Upgrade Victor Vasquez N Undetermined, General Fund 120,000 517,000
TG Fire Mobile Data Terminals Brian Dunn N Undetermined 182,600 182,600
10

300. City of San Angelo
2013‐2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Summary of Projects
Project Type Key: IN= Infrastructure; AP= Airport; COF= City Operation Facilities; CFP‐ Community Facilities & Parks; EN= Environmental Projects; EQ= Equipment; TG= Technology
Dedicated/C
Project ommitted Total Project
Type Division Project Title Project Manager Funding Proposed Funding Source 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 Costs
Information
TG Server Upgrades John Eades N 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 250,000
Technology General Fund, Undetermined
Information
TG IBM Power 7 Server John Eades N General Fund, Undetermined 65,000 65,000
Technology
Level 2 Other Projects Total 34,592,781 11,892,465 2,770,278 2,873,917 1,342,500 84,679,315
2013‐2018 Capital Improvement Plan Level 1 & 2 Projects Total 95,074,331 63,943,146 18,122,112 15,901,928 10,203,711 487,488,084
11

301. This page was intentionally left blank
12

302. 2013-2018
Capital
Improvement
Plan
Infrastructure
Projects
LEVEL 1
Projects related to Streets, Water, Waste Water, & Storm Water
13

303. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Mill and Overlay of Main St. from Houston Harte to 19th St.
Responsible Dept: Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton Bailey
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - 185,000 - - - - - $ 185,000
Description:
Mill and overlay is a street maintenance process whereby the top 1"-3" of existing asphalt pavement is removed with a milling machine and a 1"-3"
layer of asphalt is placed with a asphalt paver directly over the milled area. Mill and overlay considered a "high-level" preventative maintenance
activity or "low-level" reconstruction effort that falls between sealcoat maintenance and full depth reconstruction with respect to overall cost and
project complexity. The success of the mill and overlay process is largely dependent upon the condition of the roadway foundation (base course
and subgrade). With the roadway foundation in good condition, a mill and overlay can potentially add 10-15 years to the useful life of the roadway.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 185,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 185,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: December 2012 100%
then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: April 2013 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
General Fund $ 185,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Reduce overall roadway maintenance $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
$ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Improve ride quality and reduce future maintenance costs.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $181,551
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) Main Street San Angelo Texas
14

304. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Mill and Overlay of 14th St. from Chadbourne St. to Main St.
Responsible Dept: Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton Bailey
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - 403,000 - - - - - $ 403,000
Description:
Mill and overlay is a street maintenance process whereby the top 1"-3" of existing asphalt pavement is removed with a milling machine and a 1"-3"
layer of asphalt is placed with a asphalt paver directly over the milled area. Mill and overlay considered a "high-level" preventative maintenance
activity or "low-level" reconstruction effort that falls between sealcoat maintenance and full depth reconstruction with respect to overall cost and
project complexity. The success of the mill and overlay process is largely dependent upon the condition of the roadway foundation (base course
and subgrade). With the roadway foundation in good condition, a mill and overlay can potentially add 10-15 years to the useful life of the roadway.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 403,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 403,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: December 2012 100%
then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: April 2013 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
General Fund $ 403,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Reduce overall roadway maintenance $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
$ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Improve ride quality and reduce future maintenance costs.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $395,486
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 14th Street San Angelo Texas
15

305. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Mill and Overlay of 19th St. from Bryant Blvd. West to Concho River
Responsible Dept: Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton Bailey
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - 378,000 - - - - - $ 378,000
Description:
Mill and overlay is a street maintenance process whereby the top 1"-3" of existing asphalt pavement is removed with a milling machine and a 1"-3"
layer of asphalt is placed with a asphalt paver directly over the milled area. Mill and overlay considered a "high-level" preventative maintenance
activity or "low-level" reconstruction effort that falls between sealcoat maintenance and full depth reconstruction with respect to overall cost and
project complexity. The success of the mill and overlay process is largely dependent upon the condition of the roadway foundation (base course
and subgrade). With the roadway foundation in good condition, a mill and overlay can potentially add 10-15 years to the useful life of the roadway.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 378,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 378,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: December 2012 100%
then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: April 2013 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
General Fund $ 378,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Reduce overall roadway maintenance $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
$ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Improve ride quality and reduce future maintenance costs.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $370,952
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 19th Street San Angelo Texas
16

306. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Reconstruction of Bell St from Concho River to Old Ballinger Hwy
Responsible Dept: Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton Bailey
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - 4,800,000 - - - - - $ 4,800,000
Description:
Full depth reconstruction of Bell St. from Concho River to Old Ballinger Hwy, installation of sidewalks and ADA compliant curb ramps.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 4,800,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 4,800,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0%
then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Undetermined $ 4,800,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Reduce roadway maintenance $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
$ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Improve ride quality, provide ADA compliant handicap access, provide pedestrian amenities and reduce future maintenance costs.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $4,710,500
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) Bell Street San Angelo Texas
17

307. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Reconstruction of Glenna Dr. from Houston Harte to Junius St.
Responsible Dept: Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton Bailey
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - - - - 1,300,000 - - $ 1,300,000
Description:
Full depth reconstruction of Glenna Dr. from Houston Harte to Junius St., installation of sidewalks and ADA compliant curb ramps.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 1,300,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 1,300,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0%
then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Undetermined $ 1,300,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Reduce roadway maintenance $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
$ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Improve ride quality, provide ADA compliant handicap access, provide pedestrian amenities and reduce future maintenance costs.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $1,205,658
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) Glenna Drive San Angelo Texas
18

308. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Reconstruction of Main St. from 19th St. to 26th St.
Responsible Dept: Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton Bailey
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - - - - - 1,800,000 - $ 1,800,000
Description:
Full depth reconstruction of Main St. from 19th St. to 26th St., installation of sidewalks and ADA compliant curb ramps.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 1,800,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 1,800,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0%
then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Undetermined $ 1,800,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Reduce roadway maintenance $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
$ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Improve ride quality, provide ADA compliant handicap access, provide pedestrian amenities and reduce future maintenance costs.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $1,638,246
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) Main Street San Angelo Texas
19

309. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Reconstruction of MLK Blvd. from 25th St. to 29th St.
Responsible Dept: Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton Bailey
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - - - 2,500,000 - - - $ 2,500,000
Description:
Full depth reconstruction of MLK Blvd. from 25th St. to 29th St., installation of sidewalks and ADA compliant curb ramps.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction - -
Other - -
Total $ - $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0%
then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Undetermined $ 2,500,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Reduce roadway maintenance $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
$ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Improve ride quality, provide ADA compliant handicap access, provide pedestrian amenities and reduce future maintenance costs.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $2,362,748
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) Martin Luther King Blvd. San Angelo Texas
20

310. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Reconstruction of Southwest Blvd from Sunset South to Railroad Tracks
Responsible Dept: Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton Bailey
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - - 6,500,000 - - - - $ 6,500,000
Description:
Full depth reconstruction of Southwest Blvd from Sunset south to railroad tracks, installation of sidewalks and ADA compliant curb ramps.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 6,500,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 6,500,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0%
then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Undetermined $ 6,500,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Reduce roadway maintenance $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
$ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Improve ride quality, provide ADA compliant handicap access, provide pedestrian amenities and reduce future maintenance costs.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $6,259,865
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) Southwest Blvd San Angelo Texas
21

311. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Reconstruction of 29th St. from Bryant Blvd. to N. Chadbourne
Responsible Dept: Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton Bailey
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - - - - - 2,500,000 - $ 2,500,000
Description:
Full depth reconstruction of29th St. from Bryant Blvd. to 2018 N. Chadbourne, installation of sidewalks and ADA compliant curb ramps.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 2,500,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 2,500,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0%
then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Undetermined $ 2,500,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Reduce roadway maintenance $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
N/A $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Improve ride quality, provide ADA compliant handicap access, provide pedestrian amenities and reduce future maintenance costs.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $2,275,342
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 29th Street San Angelo Texas
22

312. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Sealcoat Program
Responsible Dept: Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton Bailey
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
663,000 1,800,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 $ 4,863,000
Description:
Sealcoat is the application of asphalt and aggregate over existing asphalt roadway surfaces for the purpose of sealing surface cracks for the
protection of the roadway foundation. The foundation of a roadway accounts for approximately 67% of the total cost of a roadway. Sealcoat is part
of the City's preventative maintenance program and must be done to realize the full useful life of existing asphalt roadways throughout the City.
Sealcoat should be applied to asphalt roadways at intervals not to exceed 8 years.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 1,800,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 1,800,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: February 2013 50%
then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: September 2013 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
General Fund $ 1,800,000
Undetermined $ -
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Reduce routine maintenance costs associated with reparing $ - - - - -
cracks and potholes created by severe cracking
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Increase routine maintenance costs associated with $ - - - - -
repairing cracks and potholes created by severe cracking
Performance Measures:
Improve ride quality, reduce future maintenance costs and extend the need for expensive long term reconstruction costs.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $4,676,871
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) City Wide San Angelo Texas
23

313. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Storm Water Quality Improvement Projects
Responsible Dept: Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton Bailey
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - 700,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 23,300,000 $ 29,300,000
Description:
Construction of projects to address specific stormwater quality issues within major drainage-ways throughout San Angelo that have been identified
through the analysis and modeling of data collected by stormwater monitoring stations.
Supporting planning document(s):
City of San Angelo Stormwater Management Plan and associated City Council approved stormwater budget.
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 30,000,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 30,000,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete
the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 0%
then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: 2013 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Future stormwater utility fee $ 30,000,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Operations and Maintenance $ 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
A reduction in the measured levels of pollution within drainage ways and rivers throughout and downstream of San Angelo.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $26,524,213
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) City wide San Angelo Texas
24

314. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Storm Water Quality Improvement Projects - Sunset Lake Improvements
Responsible Dept: Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton Bailey
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - 700,000 - $ 700,000
Description:
Sunset Lake acts as a stormwater retention/detention pond. Sampling and analysis through the City's stormwater quality monitoring program has
resulted in the determination that stormwater discharges into Sunset Lake contain a significant amount of suspended solids (sediment) and
dissolved solids (primarily nitrogen and phosphorus from fertilizer). Sunset Lake is no longer efficient in removing these contaminants because
sediment deposits have caused it to become "silted in". Shallow water depth and nutrient rich water and sediment result in the lake becoming
covered with moss and other aquatic vegetation during the summer months. This vegetation uses all of the available oxygen in the water which has
resulted in several fish kills over the last several years and a continuous odor problem. The average depth of Sunset Lake is approximately four (4)
feet. This project would increase the depth of the lake to its original depth of approximately 8 feet and add components making more efficient at
removing contaminants from stormwater.
Supporting planning document(s):
City of San Angelo Stormwater Management Plan and associated City Council approved stormwater budget.
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 700,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 700,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert
Project Schedule: % Complete
in the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from
Design: 2013 10%
File, then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and
Implementation: 2014 0%
Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
Stormwater Utility Fee $ 700,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Cost associated with routine maintenance which includes $ - - - - 10,000
10 000
draining Sunset Lake and removing sediment and debris
every five years.
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Cost associated with removing vegetation debris from Sunset $ 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Lake.
Performance Measures:
A reduction in the measured levels of pollution within drainage ways and rivers throughout and downstream of San Angelo.
Notes:
Design is being done in-house, therefore there is no separate cost estimate.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $683,241
Not Completing Project $28,635
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) Between Loop 306 and Sunset Dr./Huntington San Angelo Texas
2) and Brook Hollow Ln.
25

315. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Remediation of Drainage Issue: West Ave. P at Bryant Blvd.
Responsible Division: Stormwater Project Manager: Clinton Bailey
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - 700,000 1,300,000 - - - - $ 2,000,000
Description:
During storm events, an excessive amount of street flow occurs across Bryant Blvd. flowing down Ave. P. The existing culverts under Bryant
discharge directly onto Ave. P, and after crossing Bryant, the flow continues to the east along Ave P, cuts through an alley between Ave P and Q, the
continues south in a channel between Irving St. and Chadbourne St. until in reaches the Red Arroyo. Remediation of this drainage problem consists of
the construction of drainage improvements including street re-grading, culvert modification and subsurface drainage system installation.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land 50,000 -
Design - -
Construction 1,950,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 2,000,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design: 100%
then click Browse…
Implementation: 0%
Browse to your picture,
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
General Fund $ 2,000,000
Undetermined $ -
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Performance Measure:
Reduce flood hazards to protect property and the health, safety and welfare of the public.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $1,975,761
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) W. Ave. P at Bryant San Angelo Texas
26

316. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Avenue D Water Line Replacement
Responsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Robert Bluthardt
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - 75,000 25,000 25,000 - - - $ 125,000
Description:
The water lines behind Officers' Row are ancient, possibly dating to the late 1800s! The water has poor pressure and a foul smell and objectionable
appearance. It poses long-term challenges to appliances and plumbing fixtures. Staff recommends a full replacement of the lines. These lines
serve several critical buildings that serve our VIP guests (OQ 1), our visitors (OQ 3 and OQ 4), our renters and events (OQ 8) and staff (OQ 2, OQ
7 & O Q 9).
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 125,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 125,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design: 1 month 0%
then click Browse…
Implementation 1 month 0%
Browse to your picture,
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
Water Fund $ 125,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Longer lasting hot water heaters and other appliances. $ 1,000 1,500 2,500 - -
materials,
Less expenses for chemicals and cleaning materials noted
by these figures.
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Potential expenses for interior appliances and fixtures; $ 1,500 2,000 2,500 - -
loss of income from rental buildings due to poor public
perception of site
Performance Measures:
Increased Rentals; Fewer Complaints; Fewer Appliance/Fixture Replacements
Notes:
The fort board and staff have consistently ranked the water service and quality on this side of the fort as a major concern. The improved water
service is vital to the fort's success in ongoing programing and public service. It will also contribute to the better functioning of these structures.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $126,094
Not Completing Project $5761
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 100 & 200 Block/ East Ave. D San Angelo Texas
27

317. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Automated Meter Reading System (AMR)
Responsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ 3,750,000 1,300,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 - - - - $ 7,550,000
Description:
There are approximately 33,000 water meters in the City's water system. The existing meters will be replaced or upgraded with electronic meter
registering equipment. Meter readings will be transmitted automatically through a wireless network to the utility billing office. The system will eliminate
the need to manually read meters. Customer service will be improved by having timely and accurate meter information and leak detection monitoring
which can notify a customer automatically of unusual water usage. Existing meter readers will be reassigned to system maintenance in the distribution
system.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 7,500,000 4,332,815
Other - -
Total $ 7,500,000 $ 4,332,815
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design:
then click Browse…
Implementation: 2011 65%
Browse to your picture,
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
Water CIP Fund $ 7,500,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Rreduction of two meter reader positions $ (44,000) (45,000) (46,000) (46,000) (46,000)
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ -
Performance Measure:
Meter readings will be obtained each month on a fixed date allowing for improved billing of the account.
Notes:
A total of 21,288 meters have been converted to AMR. 5,600 AMR units or in stock to be installed.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $3,515,993
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) City wide San Angelo Texas
28

318. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Clay Pipe Replacements
Responsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ 2,000,000 997,896 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 66,000,000 $ 73,997,896
Description:
Clay sewer mains were the industry standard prior to the 1980's. It is a strong but brittle pipe which does not perform well with soil movement. Highly
susceptible to root intrusion, inflow, cracking and clogging. Traditional joints are not considered water or root proof. These mains are aging rapidly and
often fail causing overflows. These overflows are monitored by the TCEQ and EPA and environmental fines can be assessed. The program is a
continual capital replacement program in which aged and failing mains will be replaced on a condition and age priority.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 74,000,000 2,000,000
Other - -
Total $ 74,000,000 $ 2,000,000
Project Schedule: % Complete
Design: In-house 100%
Implementation: ongoing 3%
Funding Sources: Amount
Water CIP Fund $ 74,000,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Increased cost for repairs to mains and manholes $ 20,000 20,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
Performance Measures:
Approximately 15,000 ft. of pipe will be replaced each year.
Notes:
Identification and selection of projects underway. First project was bid in 2010.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $64,673,971
Not Completing Project $108,455
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) City wide San Angelo Texas
29

319. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Collector Main Replacements
Responsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ 12,700,000 7,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 - - $ 23,700,000
Description:
Replacement of aging and failing sewer collector mains. Sewer collector mains are generally larger than 12 inches in diameter and serve large areas
of the population. Many of these large aged lines are concrete. Concrete mains are highly susceptible to corrosive gases and the pipes degrade to
failure. Failure of these lines cause large service area disruptions and environmental fines can be substantial. This is a long term continual project.
As the aged mains are replaced, newer mains are aging to the point of potential failure. In addition, growth of the City places ever increasing loads on
these lines making the continued reliable service even more critical. As the City grows many of these mains will need to be replaced with larger mains
or additional mains to handle service loads.
Supporting planning document(s):
Wastewater collection system master plan
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 23,700,000 12,700,000
Other - -
Total $ 23,700,000 $ 12,700,000
Project Schedule: % Complete
Design: In-house 100%
Implementation: 2011 54%
Funding Sources: Amount
Wastewater CIP Fund $ 23,700,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Increased repairs of old mains $ 15,000 15,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
Performance Measures:
About 10,000 ft of 42" main were installed under the 2007 contract and about 7,300 ft of 30" main was replaced in the 2010 contract.
Notes:
42" on Christoval Rd complete December 2008. 36" along Rio Concho Dr. were designed and bid in 2010.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $10,816,939
Not Completing Project $84,819
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 42" main-1800 Christoval Rd. San Angelo Texas
2) 30' MAIN-1002 Rio Concho Dr.
30

320. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Hickory Water Supply Development Phase I
Responsible Division: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ 18,000,000 35,000,000 37,000,000 30,000,000 - - - - $ 120,000,000
Description:
Development of the Hickory Water Supply will provide the city with an underground water supply. The project will be developed in three phases.
Phase I will begin in 2011 and be operational by 2014. It will consist of installation of pumps in 9 existing wells, construction of well field collector
pipelines, construction of a booster pump station at the well field, construction of about 60 miles of 30 inch transmission main from the well field to the
city and construction of a treatment facility.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 17,000,000 17,000,000
Construction 103,000,000 1,000,000
Other - -
Total $ 120,000,000 $ 18,000,000
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design: 2011 100%
then click Browse…
Implementation:2013 0%
Browse to your picture,
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
Water Fund $ 94,500,000
Type B sales tax $ 25,500,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Undetermined $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Undetermined $ - - - - -
Performance Measure:
Phase I of the project will provide the city with 6 million gallons per day, about 6,700 acre-feet per year of water.
Notes:
Well field collector pipeline on existing wells is complete. 30 inch transmission main is 60% complete. Booster Pump Station is on schedule.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $100,201,794
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) Melvin Texas
31

321. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
High Service Pump Station Rehabilitation
Responsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - 3,950,000 - - - - - - $ 3,950,000
Description:
The High Service Pump Station consists of 6 pumps which pump water from the Water Treatment Plant into the distribution system and tanks
throughout the City. This station is critical to the continual delivery of water to the citizens and customers of the City of San Angelo. Pumps 1 & 2 are
in a 1940's era station and the pumps have been in service since that time. Pumps 3 thru 6 were installed in the 1960's and have been replaced with
new pumps over the last 5 years. Pumps 1 and 2 need to be completely replaced and the electrical equipment on pumps 3 thru 6 needs to be
replaced.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 3,950,000 2,961,233
Other - -
Total $ 3,950,000 $ 2,961,233
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete
the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 100%
then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: 2012-2013 75%
Funding Sources: Amount
Water CIP Fund $ 3,950,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Increased repairs to pumps and motor $ 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000
Performance Measures:
High Service Pump Station #1 is substantially complete. Replace electrical equipment on remaining pumps still remains to be completed.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $3,950,000
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 327 E. Ave I San Angelo Texas
32

322. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Lift Station Improvements
Responsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ 320,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 $ 1,720,000
Description:
The City of San Angelo has 48 lift stations and 151 grinder stations that it operates and maintains. Each year several stations are added based on City
growth. These pump stations are mostly mechanical and electrical in nature and operate in highly corrosive environments. The expected operating life
of pumps is 5 years and that is with consistent maintenance. This program is intended to continually replace pumps and electrical components for
continued reliable service. Failure of these systems affects regional areas of population and can result in sewer overflows and possible flooding of
customer facilities. The program will also include the addition of telemetry equipment at the lift stations to provide for 24 hour per day remote
monitoring of the lift stations for and alarms or problems.
Supporting planning document(s):
Wastewater collection system master plan
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 1,720,000 320,000
Other - -
Total $ 1,720,000 $ 320,000
Project Schedule: % Complete
Design: In-house 100%
Implementation: ongoing 20%
Funding Sources: Amount
Wastewater CIP Fund $ 1,720,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Increased cost for maintenance of lift stations $ 35,000 35,000 40,000 40,000 40,000
Performance Measures:
Rehabilitation work will be done on about 3 stations each year.
Notes:
Continual capital replacement program for lift station pumps and electrical systems through out the year.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $1,324,049
Not Completing Project $179,361
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) City wide San Angelo Texas
33

323. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Nasworthy Dam Emergency Spillway
Responsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - - 2,000,000 - - - - $ 2,000,000
Description:
A portion of the earthen embankment section along the southern portion of Nasworthy Dam is designed to serve as an emergency spillway for the
dam. The emergency spillway consists of two lowered sections of the dam's embankment which would be overtopped when discharges occur. The
earthen spillways however do not have any protection from erosion of a discharge, the result which would be a wash out and failure of the dam
section. The spillways need to be modified to withstand overtopping flows with reinforced concrete paving and a 500 ft. diversion dike and channel
downstream of the dam to protect the downstream toe of the dam.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 2,000,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 2,000,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete
the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 0%
then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: 2013 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Water CIP Fund $ 2,000,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Modification of the emergency spillways will bring the facility into compliance with TCEQ dam design standards.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $1,926,112
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 1900 Beaty Rd. San Angelo Texas
34

324. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Nasworthy Dam Stop Log System
Responsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - - - 750,000 - - - $ 750,000
Description:
Stop logs are a gate system that is used to isolate a radial gate on the dam for servicing or to stop water discharge through the gate bay in the event of
a failure of a radial gate. The dam currently has a full length slide gate which is installed in the gate bay to isolate a gate. The slide gate must be
moved by a large crane from the downstream side of the dam and can only be installed when the radial gate is closed. With this system, there is no
way to install a stop gate when water is flowing through a radial gate bay. A new stop log system is needed whereby the stop logs can be installed
from the bridge deck with flow going through the gate bay.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 750,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 750,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete
the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 0%
then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: 2013 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Water CIP Fund $ 750,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
The stop log system will allow a gate on the dam to be isolated in an emergency situation
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $708,824
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 1900 Beaty Rd. San Angelo Texas
35

325. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Lake Nasworthy Gate Operators
Responsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - 1,034,000 2,216,000 - - - - - $ 3,250,000
Description:
Nasworthy Dam has 15 radial gates that are used to release flood waters through the dam. The gates are operated by two mobile operators that are
mounted on carts which are pulled between gates. The operators are original equipment from when the dam was constructed in 1929. The average
time to set up, open a gate and move to the next gate is 25 minutes. Based on the gate operating time needed to pass the probable maximum local
flood for the reservoir, the current operating speed is not adequate to keep floodwaters from overtopping the gates. The proposed project will install a
permanent operating winch on each gate. This will allow multiple gates to be operated within the time needed to pass the design flood. The
improvements will bring the gate operations into compliance with TCEQ dam regulations.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 3,250,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 3,250,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete
the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 2013 0%
then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: 2014 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Water CIP Fund $ 3,250,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Replacement of the gate operators will bring the facility into compliance with TCEQ regulations.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $3,208,681
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 1900 Beaty Rd. San Angelo Texas
36

326. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Transmission Line Valves Replacement
Responsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ 1,650,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 - - - $ 3,650,000
Description:
This project is the replacement of aged and failing transmission valves. Transmission lines are larger than 16" and serve large areas of the population.
Valves on these lines are rarely used and have not been routinely exercised. Older valves utilized steel discs and seats and are highly susceptible to
corrosion. Deposits in the seats and on the discs prevent the valves from seating and degradation of the steel slides and gates cause valves to seize
or bind and break. Continual maintenance and replacement of valves over the long term is required to maintain a consistent and reliable system.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 3,650,000 1,650,000
Other - -
Total $ 3,650,000 $ 1,650,000
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete
the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 2010 100%
then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: 2011 45%
Funding Sources: Amount
Water CIP Fund $ 3,650,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Additional time and resources to isolate pipe segments $ 15,000 20,000 20,000 - -
for repair of leaks and water shut off to large areas of the city
Performance Measures:
Valves are to be replaced annually.
Notes:
22 valves were replaced in the 2008 contract.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $1,944,755
Not Completing Project $52,883
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) Various sites in SMD 1,2,3,4,5,6 San Angelo Texas
37

327. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Transmission Mains
Responsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ 5,640,000 - 5,100,000 5,300,000 6,000,000 6,150,000 - - $ 28,190,000
Description:
Replacement and upgrade of transmission mains. These mains are larger than 16" in size and serve large areas of the populations. Reliable and
continued service is required to move water from the plant to the tanks and pump stations throughout the City. Projects are planned as follows: 2006:
Phase I-Southwest Feeder Transmission Main, $4,500,000; 2008: Ave I Main from Metcalfe to Chadbourne $1,140,000;
2010: Ave. I Transmission Main Replacement from Chadbourne to Bryant Blvd, $1,600,000
2012: 20" Ave. K Transmission Main, $3,500,000
Future Projects: 2014: Phase II-Southwest Feeder Transmission Main, $5,300,000; 2016: North Transmission Main Improvements, $6,000,000.
Upper plane transmission mains which serve the highest growth areas will likely begin requiring upgrades by the 2017 timeframe, $6,150,000.
Supporting planning document(s):
Water System Master Plan
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 28,190,000 5,640,000
Other - -
Total $ 28,190,000 $ 5,640,000
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete
the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design:
then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: 2011 20%
Funding Sources: Amount
Water CIP Fund $ 28,190,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Increased repairs to existing mains and more interruption $ 30,000 35,000 40,000 40,000 40,000
of service to large areas of the city due to the leaks.
Performance Measures:
Approximately 5,600 ft of 20" water main are planned to be replaced.
Notes:
2006 Southwest Feeder Main complete and placed in service January 15, 2008. Ave I main replacement work complete in 2009.
Project % Completion: Southwest Feeder Phase I (100%); Ave I (0%); Ave K (0%); Southwest Feeder Phase II (0%); North (0%); Upper Plane (0%)
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $21,891,876
Not Completing Project $174,454
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 100 Ave I San Angelo Texas
38

328. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Twin Buttes Eco-System Restoration
Responsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ 900,000 100,000 - - - - - $ 1,000,000
Description:
The project will provide for the removal of invasive brush in the lake basin. The project consists of the removal of 3,900 acres of salt cedar & willow
baccharis and 5,600 acres of mesquite.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 800,000 700,000
Other 200,000 200,000
Total $ 1,000,000 $ 900,000
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert
Project Schedule: % Complete
in the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from
Design:
File, then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and
Implementation: 2013 90%
Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
Water CIP Fund $ 225,000
Water Operating $ 375,000
State Soil and Water Board $ 400,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Approximately 9,500 acres will be cleared of invasive brush in the reservoir basin.
Notes:
Initial work began in 2010 with be spraying of salt cedar in the upper reaches of the reservoir. Each year additional areas will be sprayed
proceeding down through the basin to the dam.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $100,000
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 6 miles Southwest of San Angelo San Angelo Texas
39

329. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Water Billing and Customer Service Office Remodeling
Responsible Division: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - 500,000 500,000 - - - - - $ 1,000,000
Description:
Remodel the existing building to provide for a modern work environment by replacing electrical wiring, restrooms, new work areas for customer service
representatives and billing personnel, exterior repairs and painting, handicapped accessibly entrance, increased security for cash collections.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 100,000 -
Construction 900,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 1,000,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design: 2013 0%
then click Browse…
Implementation: end-2014 0%
Browse to your picture,
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
Water CIP Fund $ 1,000,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Undetermined $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Undetermined $ - - - - -
Performance Measure:
20 employees currently occupy the building. This will create a better working environment for these employees that assist in approximately 50,000 call-
ins a year. Remodeling the building will also impact the 30,000 walk-in customers that access the building annually.
Notes:
The facility will be evaluated for remodeling or replacement. Construction planned for the end of 2014.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $990,677
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 122 W. 1st St. San Angelo Texas
40

330. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Water Main Replacements
Responsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ 15,731,509 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 29,230,000 $ 52,761,509
Description:
This is an ongoing water mains replacement program initiated in 2001 with priority replacement of 2" mains throughout the City. The 2" main
replacement program is continuing with primary emphasis until the 2011-2012 time frame. Gradually the emphasis will be moving to rusty water mains
and aged cast iron mains. Since 2001: 334,000 feet of 2" mains replaced. 90,000 feet of 2" mains remaining. Cast iron and rusty mains: 470,000 feet
of mains to replace at projected cost of $30,930,000. This is a continuous capital requirement for rehabilitation and replacement of aging distribution
systems. As systems are replaced, other sections are aging to the point of need for replacement.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 52,761,509 15,731,509
Other - -
Total $ 52,761,509 $ 15,731,509
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete
the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: In-House 100%
then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: 2001/ongoing 30%
Funding Sources: Amount
Water CIP Fund $ 52,761,509
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Increased cost for repairs to mains and additional $ 30,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000
flushing of mains to maintain water quality.
Performance Measures:
Approximately 15,000 ft of mains will be replace each year.
Notes:
This is an ongoing capital maintenance program.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $33,552,460
Not Completing Project $160,541
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) Various locations in SMD 1,2,3,4,5,6 San Angelo Texas
41

331. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Water Reclamation Plant Improvements
Responsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ 400,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 $ 1,800,000
Description:
The Water Reclamation Facility treats all of the wastewater from the City of San Angelo and delivers to irrigation. The operating environment for
wastewater treatment is harsh on all systems including mechanical, electrical and concrete. There are hundreds of mechanical systems in the plant
including pumps, clarifiers, air scrubbers, sludge belts, blowers, heat exchangers and more. Most of these systems need some type of major repair or
replacement every 5 years. Concrete walls of basins and equipment are subject to corrosive properties present at wastewater plants and need repair
and rehabilitation every 5 to 6 years. This program schedules funding to facilitate repair, rehabilitation or replacement on a condition and critical priority
basis.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 1,800,000 400,000
Other - -
Total $ 1,800,000 $ 400,000
Project Schedule: % Complete
Design: In-house 100%
Implementation: ongoing 22%
Funding Sources: Amount
Wastewater CIP Fund $ 1,800,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Increased costs to repair in the future due to continual $ 100,000 100,000 150,000 150,000 150,000
deterioration of facilities
Performance Measures:
Repairs to various structures and mechanical equipment with a life expectancy of 10 years.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $1,324,049
Not Completing Project $611,841
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 1898 City Farm Rd. San Angelo Texas
42

332. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
WTP Equipment Improvements
Responsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ 500,000 300,000 200,000 400,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 $ 2,200,000
Description:
Rehabilitation and replacement of aging water treatment plant equipment based on condition, age and criticality. Equipment includes items such as
flocculator mechanisms, clarifier mechanisms, filters, plant valves and other plant operation mechanisms.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 2,200,000 500,000
Other - -
Total $ 2,200,000 $ 500,000
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete
the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 2010 100%
then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: ongoing 23%
Funding Sources: Amount
Water CIP Fund $ 2,200,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Increased maintenance of equipment and eventual shut down $ 25,000 35,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
of equipment when it can no longer be repaired
Performance Measures:
Control valves, clarifier equipment and electrical equipment will be replaced with a life expectancy of about 20 years.
Notes:
Projects include work on control valves and electrical service in the filter building.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $1,616,660
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 327 E Ave I San Angelo Texas
43

333. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Wastewater Service to Existing Developed Areas
Responsible Dept: Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ 3,000,000 1,200,000 - - - - - 13,000,000 $ 17,200,000
Description:
Some areas of the City do not have wastewater service. To establish service to the areas may require construction of new collector mains, service
mains and lift stations. The estimated cost to provide service to the following areas is as listed below.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
No. Area Estimated Cost
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
1 Green Acres $3.0 Million Construction 17,000,000 3,000,000
Other - -
2 Mercedes & Townview $500,000
Total $ 17,000,000 $ 3,000,000
3 Red Bluff $2.0 Million
4 Country Club Lake Estates $2.0 Million Project Schedule: % Complete
Design: In-house 100%
Implementation: 2010 18%
5 Country Club Road $3.5 Million
6 Butler Farm $2.0Million
Funding Sources: Amount
7 Los Lomas $2.0 Million Wastewater CIP Fund $ 17,000,000
Total $15.0 Million
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Increased revenue from new wastewater customers $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Lost revenue from residents not on City wastewater $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Provide municipal wastewater service to residents that currently have on site wastewater disposal systems.
Notes:
Extension of wastewater service to the Red Bluff area to complete the sewer collection system at Lake Nasworthy planned to begin in 2013
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $12,811,167
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) Various locations in SMD 1,2,6 San Angelo Texas
44

334. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Replace School Zone and Crosswalk Equipment
Responsible Dept: Traffic Operations Project Manager: Shane Kelton
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ 68,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 - $ 158,000
Description:
Replace crosswalk signs with the bright yellow green high reflectivity signs. Replace or update time clocks with new clocks that also can be sent time
and date information via radio or pager signal. Replace painted crosswalks with thermo plastic heat tape. Replacement of crosswalk signs and
crosswalks will provide improved visibility for pedestrian safety.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction - -
Other 158,000 68,000
Total $ 158,000 $ 68,000
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design: 0%
then click Browse…
Implementation: 2012 60%
Browse to your picture,
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
Tom Green County Fee $ 158,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Annual electrical savings of $4,500.00 per year. $ (4,500) (4,500) (4,500) (4,500) (4,500)
Replace Thermoplastic - - - - 32,500
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Continued cost of repainting crosswalks. $ 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000
Performance Measures:
150 Signs have been replaced at all school crossings and all crosswalks have been marked with thermo plastic material.
Notes:
Funding Source - Crosswalk Guard and Equipment Revenues collected by Tom Green County Fee. Radios and time clocks will be upgraded as
funds are available from the county. The thermoplastic crosswalk material will reduce the maintenance of crosswalks to once every five years from
repainting crosswalks every two months.
Traffic Operations Divisions currently maintains 150 crosswalks. The cost to replace with thermoplastic every 5 years will cost approximately
$32,500.00.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $95,013
Not Completing Project $99,269
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) City Wide San Angelo Texas
45

335. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Sign Reflectivity Upgrade
Responsible Division: Traffic Operations Project Manager: Shane Kelton
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ 94,000 48,000 56,550 57,681 58,834 60,011 61,211 141,077 $ 577,364
Description:
Upgrade informational, warning and regulatory signs to meet newly established federal required mandates for reflectivity. The Traffic Division has
inventoried and tested the retroreflectivity of all the City signs. They currently have maintenance responsibily for approximately 12,000 informational,
warning and regulatory signs. Tests revealed 30% have failed and are in need of replacement. The Federal Highway Administration has extended
the deadline for the replacement of failed signs from 2018 to 2020. In order to stay in compliance with the mandate the Traffic Division will have to
replace approximately 870 signs a year. This number includes the 3,600 that are currently out of compliance and the extimated 5% that will fail each
of the following years. The replacement of signs to stay in compliance will be an ongoing responsibility well past the compliance deadline.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction - -
Other 577,364 94,000
Total $ 577,364 $ 94,000
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design: 0%
then click Browse…
Implementation: ongoing 30%
Browse to your picture,
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
General Fund $ 577,364
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Increase in operation budget to meet and maintain federal 122,550 126,081 129,730 133,502 137,402
mandate. This includes the cost of two additional full time
employees and O&M of an additional vehicle.
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Potential Gross Negligence Liablity $ - - - - -
Performance Measure:
In order to maintain and stay in compliance with the federal mandates the Traffic Division will be required to replace approximately 870 signs per
year.
Notes:
COMPLIANCE DATES: January 2012-Implement a sign maintenance program that addresses the minimum sign retroreflectivity requirements.
January 2017-Complaince with the new retroreflectivity requirements for most of their traffic signs they have installed, including all red and white or
white and black "regulatory" signs, yellow and black "warning" signs and ground-mounted green and white "guide" signs (except street name signs).
January 2020-Compliance with the new retroreflectivity requirements for all signs.
The Traffic Operations Division has inventoried all signs for a total of 12,000. Of the 12,000 30% have failed the retroreflectivity tests for minimum
requirements. Of the remaining 8,400 signs we are estimating that approximately 5% of those will fail the retroreflectometer test on a yearly basis
until all signs have been replaced after 8 years.
Mandated by Federal Highway Administration - If not completed the City may be found at fault for Gross Negligence Liability. In order to
accomplish this project and remain in compliance the Traffic Division has hired an additional two full time employees and will purchase a vehicle.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $1,065,185
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) City Wide San Angelo Texas
46

336. 2013-2018
Capital
Improvement
Plan
Other Projects
LEVEL 2
Airport
City Operations Facilities
Community Facilities and parks
City Facilities
Environmental
Equipment
Technology

337. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Apron Joint Seal
Responsible Dept: Airport Project Manager: Luis Elguezabal
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - - - 54,900 555,555 - - $ 610,455
Description:
Design, engineering, and construction for the sealcoat and pavement rehabilitation of the terminal building apron and Runway 9-27 and 18-36. Over
time joint seals deteriorate causing water to penetrate the sub-surface and damage the pavement. Joint seals need to be replaced in order to
extend the life of the pavement.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land -
Design 54,900
Construction 555,555
Other -
Total $ 610,455 $ -
Project Schedule: % Complete
Design: 2016 0%
Implementation: 2017 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
FAA Grant $ 549,410
PFC Fund $ 61,045
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Pavement maintenance $ 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Increased pavement maintenance $ 15,000 15,000 25,000 45,000 45,000
Performance Measures:
The area that will need the Apron Joint Seal is approximately 359,000 SQ FT.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $589,909
Not Completing Project $135,484
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 8618 Terminal Circle San Angelo Texas
48

338. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Runway 3-21 Runway Lights and Airport Beacon Replacement
Responsible Dept: Airport Project Manager: Luis Elguezabal
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - 631,889 - - - $ 631,889
Description:
Design, engineering, and construction for high intensity runway lights for Runway 3-21 and also improvements to the rotating beacon and electrical
vault. This lighting system is 11 years old and has failed. The FAA has allocated funds for the replacement and repair of this system this fiscal year.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 55,556 -
Construction 576,333 -
Other - -
Total $ 631,889 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert Project Schedule: % Complete
in the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from Design: 2013 0%
File, then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Implementation: 2013 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
FAA Grant $ 568,700
PFC Fund $ 63,189
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Decreased maintenance costs $ 1,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 5,000
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Future failure and unreliable system $ 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000
Performance Measures:
Total of 70 lights in the system. Annual replacement of 12% of lights per year is expected until the system is re-constructed.
Notes:
The system has failed. FAA has allocated funds for the replacement of the circuit this year.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $648,728
Not Completing Project $189,083
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 8618 Terminal Circle, Suite-101 San Angelo Texas
49

339. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Airport Terminal Renovation
Responsible Dept: Airport Project Manager: Luis Elguezabal
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ 1,239,379 1,110,000 1,110,000 1,110,000 1,110,000 600,862 - - $ 6,280,241
Description:
The San Angelo Regional Airport is currently modernizing the existing terminal building. The project consists of remodeling of the landside functions
to relate to the new concourse, improve the passenger experience, and provide an aesthetic enhancement with a regional identity.
Specifically, construction consists of exterior and driveway improvements such as: new entry monument sign, terminal entrance pavement
enhancements, curbside canopies, and air traffic control tower renovations.
Improvements to the interior includes items such as: new entrance and exit vestibules, relocation and configuration of the airline ticket counters and
baggage claim belt, improvements to the security check point to assist with the screening process, structural modifications to accommodate a view
from the entrance to the arrival/departure escalator area, relocation of the airport administrative offices, adjustments to the HVAC, security, fire
protection, and IT systems, and enhancements to the meet and greet area.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 354,526 354,526
Construction 5,925,715 884,853
Other
Total $ 6,280,241 $ 1,239,379
Project Schedule: % Complete
Design: 12-2010 100%
Implementation: Start Date 01-2012 20%
Completion: 11-2013 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
FAA Grant $ 5,491,230
PFC Funds $ 289,011
Type B Sales Tax $ 500,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
More efficiency, less maintenance, improved aesthetics. $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Project is scheduled to be completed in 540 days. Contractor has used 343 days or about 64% of the time is used.
Notes:
Note that although 64% of the time allotted for completion has elapsed, only 20% of the project has been completed. Construction is about 6
months behind.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $4,874,613
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 8618 Terminal Circle San Angelo Texas
50

340. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
EOC HVAC Replacement
Responsible Dept: Emergency Management Project Manager: Teresa Covey
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - 500,000 - - - - - $ 500,000
Description:
The current HVAC system at the EOC is the original installed when the building was constructed 26 years ago. Replacement parts are scarce to
non-existent. Only TWO repair men at Duncan Mechanical Services are capable of making repairs at this time. The pneumatic control system is
inefficient and unreliable, constantly cooling or heating, which in turn cost unnecessary utility expenses. We recommend the purchase of a new
more energy efficient system. Total HVAC replacement will reduce the ongoing electrical costs and maintenance repairs.
Supporting planning document(s):
Ron Lewis, COSA Construction and Facilities Maintenance, and WTA Engineering provided the necessary preliminary cost analysis. The estimate
of $327,000 in 2008 has been adjusted by a minimum of 10% for each year since 2008 to cover inflation costs.
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 75,000 -
Construction 425,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 500,000 $ -
Project Schedule: % Complete
Design: 2014 0%
Implementation: 2014 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Undetermined $ 500,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Savings on Maintenance and Repairs $ (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) (5,000)
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Repairs and Maintenance $ 5,000 5,500 6,050 6,655 7,320
Performance Measures:
Notes:
If the HVAC system is not replaced, maintenance costs will continue to increase as the amount of leaks in the hot water lines throughout the building
continue to increase. Options for repairs are limited due to lack of the antiquated pneumatic system. Budget Impact if NOT completed reflects an
annual 10% increase in cost. If a repair needs to be made, we will take this request forward for approval, on an as needed basis.
If the HVAC system is not replaced and repairs are needed at a time when the EOC is activated, this will create a hardship on key personnel at a
time of critical decision making. The City of San Angelo Emergency Management Department is bound by contract with the FAA to maintain the
facility at 8485 Hangar Road.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $467,042
Not Completing Project $28,756
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 8485 Hangar Rd. San Angelo Texas
51

341. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Fire Station #4 Reconstruction
Responsible Dept: Fire Project Manager: Brian Dunn
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - - 2,580,000 - - - - $ 2,580,000
Description:
Relocate Fire Station #4 and reconstruct. Station 4 was constructed in 1965 and has never been improved. A fire truck cannot be purchased that
will fit in the engine bay of Station 4. Additionally, the station will be made gender compliant. The city has been in discussions with GAFB about
building the station on the corner of Bell Street and Paint Rock Road. There are several items the city will have to address if this location is
approved. We will have to re-fence the area, move some water boxes, and move a gas main. We will also be responsible for some paving. We are
looking for alternate locations at this time in case this site falls through.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land 80,000 3,684
Design 65,000 -
Construction 2,435,000 -
Other -
Total $ 2,580,000 $ 3,684
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design: 100%
then click Browse…
Implementation: 2014 0%
Browse to your picture,
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
General Fund C.O. $ 2,580,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Improved response time, lower the ISO rating
Notes:
Improved response times and geographically locating fire stations has an impact on the city's ISO rating. The ISO rating is the rating system in
which insurance companies base their insurance premiums to commercial and residential customers. The City of San Angelo will be graded in the
summer of 2008. The city should get an improved rating which will in turn reduce premiums for the citizens and businesses in the City of San
Angelo.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $2,484,685
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 702 E. Ave. L San Angelo Texas
52

342. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Fire Training Facility
Responsible Dept: Fire Project Manager: Brian Dunn
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - 1,200,000 1,400,000 - - - - - $ 2,600,000
Description:
A new fire training facility located behind the animal shelter on U.S. 67 North. This facility will have a classroom and office building and a fire burn
building. This facility will replace the current training center on Avenue L that is approaching 50 years of age. The current training center is located
on the Concho river across from the city water intake. TCEQ has basically shut down many of our fire training operations because of the proximity of
the river.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 2,600,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 2,600,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0%
then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Federal EDA Grant $ 1,200,000
General Fund Bond $ 1,400,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
At this point there isn't any impact to the operating budget $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
$ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
The ability to train current personnel and future personnel
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $2,573,896
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) Behind 3142 u.s. 67 north San Angelo Texas
53

343. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Chase State Office Building Improvements
Responsible Dept: Fort Concho/State Building Project Manager: Robert Bluthardt
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - 200,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 $ 300,000
Description:
The sprinkler risers in the Chase State Office Building are almost 60 years old and should be replaced. Also, approximately 600 feet of the
system piping has had numerous small leaks in the past five years, thus endangering whole sections of office and public space. This project will
replace them over a three year period.
Office and hallway carpets need to be replaced throughout the Chase State Office Building and Concho Valley Workforce Building in the coming
years, due to wear and tear, safety and fulfillment of exisiting leases. A multi-year plan will accommodate these needs within available funding.
HVAC units at the State Buidlings range from 10 to 12 years old and will start to fail in the coming years. To maintain proper climate control with
increasingly efficient equipment, a multi-year replacement plan is necessary.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 300,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 300,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0%
then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 2017/2018 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Fund 201 State Office Building $ 300,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Completing the project will reduce maintenance costs and
C l ti th j t ill d i t t d $ (2,500) (5,000) (10,000) (12,500) (15,000)
reduce energy consumption.
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Repair and spot replacement for carpet $ 1,000 3,000 5,000 7,000 9,000
HVAC repairs 5,000 5,000 7,500 7,500 10,000
Performance Measures:
No leaks or drops in the system pressure over time. Easier cleaning by custodial contractor; no complaints from lessees. Increased energy
efficiency and content state staffers.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $247,084
Not Completing Project $56,147
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 622 South Oaks San Angelo Texas
54

344. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Boat Storage Dock
Responsible Dept: Police Department Project Manager: Chief Tim Vasquez
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - 75,000 - - - - - $ 75,000
Description:
The San Angelo Police Department Lake Patrol is in need of a boat storage dock on Lake Nasworthy. Currently the boats are stored offsite. When
the Lake Patrol Officer receives a call on Lake Nasworthy, they must first go to the storage facility to retrieve the boat. It takes an average of 20
minutes from the time the call is received to the time the boat is on the water. With a boat dock on Lake Nasworthy the responding officer will be
able to go straight to the lake and drop the boat in the water. This will cut 20 minutes off the response time to an emergency on the lake.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 5,000 -
Construction 70,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 75,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0%
then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Undetermined $ 75,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Cut storage rental fees $ (1,560) (1,560) (1,560) (1,560) (1,560)
Electricity 700 725 750 775 800
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
None $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Decrease response time to emergency calls on Lake Nasworthy by 20 minutes.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $69,768
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) Undetermined San Angelo Texas
55

345. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Mobile Command Center Storage Facility
Responsible Dept: Police Department Project Manager: Chief Tim Vasquez
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - 60,000 - - - - - $ 60,000
Description:
The Police Department has a mobile command center that is used at various events around the city and at critical calls. It is currently housed at the
City Shop but is not covered. There is a lot of electronic equipment mounted on top and on the sides of the command center that need to be
protected from the weather. Being exposed to the sun also is causing damage to the exterior of the command center. This command center needs
to able to be deployed anytime under any circumstances. The storage facility would protect it from dangerous weather and allow it to be ready to be
deployed when needed.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 60,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 60,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0%
then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Undetermined $ 60,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Cost of electric service to the facility $ 900 925 950 975 1,000
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
None $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $63,368
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 401 E. Beauregard San Angelo Texas
56

346. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Police Department Administration Building
Responsible Dept: Police Department Project Manager: Chief Tim Vasquez
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ 135,067 - 25,775,000 - - - $ 25,910,067
Description:
The current HQ building was constructed in 1963 and was originally designed to house the Police Dept., Municipal Court, and a City Jail. At the present time, the
SAPD is housed in six separate facilities. In 2011 an architect firm completed a feasibility analysis of the current facility and future needs. The analysis cited the
following deficiencies: 1. Lack of adequate square footage 2. Lack of code compliance (ADA and Life Safety) 3. Separation of public and staff areas 4. Inadequate
building systems (electrical, plumbing, HVAC, etc) 5. Lack of public and staff parking 6. Structural concerns (both at HQ bldg. and auxiliary facilities. The probable
steps in the project are: 1. Site selections and acquisition 2. Design 3. Construction. A HQ building of approximately 108,000 sq. ft. and a parking structure are
suggested. Site costs are estimated at $775,000 to $2 million. HQ Building cost at $22 to $23 million ($220 to $230 sq.ft.) and parking structure $1.25 to $1.75
million..
Supporting planning document(s):
Assessment & Feasibility analysis are available upon request.
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land 775,000 -
Design 500,000
Construction 24,500,000 -
Other 135,067 135,067
Total $ 25,910,067 $ 135,067
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design: 2013 0.5%
then click Browse…
Implementation: 2014 0%
Browse to your picture,
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
General Fund $ 135,067
Future General Fund C.O. $ 25,775,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
$ (10,000) (20,000) (35,000) (60,000) (60,000)
Reductions are expected in the department's operating budget. Building
maintenance and repairs will decrease as well as some personnel costs. No
savings would be expected until construction is competed and will flatten
once maximum savings is achieved
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Increases in the maintenance and upkeep of the current faclity will occur until $ 30,000 40,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
a new facility is constructed or major renovations are completed at the
current bulding. Systems such as HVAC, Plumbing and Electrical will need
updating as will ADA compliance issues. (increase to current budget is
listed) -- renovations would increase the estimated costs by 3 to 5 times the
amounts listed
Performance Measure:
Notes:
The original needs assessment and feasibility study was completed mid 2011. This confirmed the SAPD's assertion that new facilities were needed.
City council members were invited to tour current facilities and were thoroughly convinced a new facility was in order. The City Manager and
Assistant City managers were on board with re-evaluating a new police facilities placement on the CIP list.
While the cost of new construction is high, the cost of acceptable renovations would equal or exceed the cost of constructions, and still not address
parking and home land security preferences for public safety facilities. Moving forward with new facilities in a timely fashion will also save money in
the long run. Construction costs are estimated to increase 4% annually.
25% reduction in total utility costs (+/- $25,000) ---- 33% reduction in maintenance personnel (+/- $35,000) --- Revenue increases from community
room rental ($7,500) ---- Increased revenue from additional training program ($3000) -- the value of increased service/accessibility to the public can't
be measured nor can the safety and security afforded by modern faciltiies. Potential for litigations should also be a concern (ADA or injury litigation)
but again these things can't be measured.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $25,121,999
Not Completing Project $207,096
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 401 E. Beauregard San Angelo Texas
57

347. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Auditorium Renovation
Responsible Dept: Civic Events Project Manager: Angelica Pena
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - 1,435,803 2,314,197 - - - - $ 3,750,000
Description:
Renovation of City Auditorium. This project includes shared costs with the City Hall renovation for the HVAC system. The balance of the available
funds will address needs that include a fire suppression system, ceiling repairs, restroom renovations, theatrical lighting, rigging and sound systems,
and aesthetics. The architect is determining which of those needs can be afforded with the $1.7 million that remains. Future improvements will be
coordinated with the San Angelo Performing Arts Coalition, which is raising funds to address those needs. To date, improvements made are the
installation of the Central plant (HVAC system) and some minor plumbing issues have been addressed.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 334,500 334,500
Construction 3,415,500 1,101,303
Other - -
Total $ 3,750,000 $ 1,435,803
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete
the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 2011 100%
then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: 2014 30%
Funding Sources: Amount
Type B Sales Tax $ 3,750,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Likely none. The City is expected to execute an agreement $ - - - - -
with SAPAC for the operation of the venue once it reopens
reopens.
That agreement will include clauses to ensure that City
expenses are wholly reimbursed.
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
None. $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
SAPAC believes a fully renovated facility will result in continuous use of the venue throughout the calendar year. In years past, the venue has
accommodated approximately 65 events per year.
Notes:
The City and SAPAC have entered into an agreement as of December 2012. SAPAC will be making additional improvements outside of the City-
funded portion of this project.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $3,664,505
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 72 W. College Ave. San Angelo Texas
58

348. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Fairgrounds Livestock Barn
Responsible Dept: Civic Events Project Manager: Angelica Pena
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - 1,000,000 - - - - - $ 1,000,000
Description:
At the request of the San Angelo Stock Show and Rodeo Association, a $1 million initiative to build a new livestock barn to replace the Qualtrust Barn
at the San Angelo Fairgrounds was included in the most recent half-cent sales tax initiative. Voters approved that initiative. Demolition of the current
facility and construction of the new barn will begin following this year's rodeo and stock show. The facility is expected to be available for use during next
year's stock show.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 75,000 68,511
Construction 925,000 499,610
Other - -
Total $ 1,000,000 $ 568,121
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete
the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 2011 91%
then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: 2012 25%
Funding Sources: Amount
Type B Sales Tax $ 1,000,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
The barn will be operated and mainted by SASSRA, so there $ - - - - -
will be no impact on the City's budget though the facility
City s budget,
will allow for growth of the stock show, which generates a
huge amount of sales and hotel tax revenue for the City.
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Because the barn is operated by the SASSRA, there would $ - - - - -
be no impact on the City's budget.
Performance Measures:
Increased number of exhibitors at the annual stock show by approximately 200.
Notes:
This project is being driven by the SASSRA.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $1,000,000
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 4608 Grape Creek Road San Angelo Texas
59

349. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Coliseum Improvements
Responsible Dept: Civic Events Project Manager: Angelica Pena
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - 60,000 - - - - - $ 60,000
Description:
There are various improvements that need to be made to the Coliseum in order to properly maintain the facility. These improvements include
spotlights, three new urinals, and a forklift. The spotlights that we currently have are at least 25 years old, inadequate, and parts are becoming
increasingly hard to find. We need 3 @ $7K a piece ($21,000). Three urinals at the coliseum need to be replaced as they currently leak and are rusted.
3 @ $2K a piece ($6,000). Lastly, we need to replace our existing forklift. Our current forklift is barely operable and requires numerous hours of staff
time to keep it running. It is used almost daily and with our upcoming indoor football season, it will be in high demmand. ($33,000)
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction - -
Other 60,000 -
Total $ 60,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click Project Schedule: % Complete
on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… then find Design: 0%
picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
HOT fund balance $ 60,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Staff time saved in maintenance functions $ (3,300) (3,300) (3,300) (3,300) (3,300)
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
None $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Notes:
Civic Events could potentially recoup $3-$5K by selling our current forklift through an online auction.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $43,282
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 50 E. 43rd St. San Angelo Texas
60

350. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Coliseum Roof Rehabilitation
Responsible Dept: Civic Events Project Manager: Angelica Pena
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - 545,000 - - - - - $ 545,000
Description:
Foster Communications Coliseum has served this community well for 54 years. There's no reason why it shouldn't serve San Angelo another 50 years
… but only if it is properly maintained. The venue's roof was recoated in 2001, though that project replaced foam on only 5 percent of the surface area.
According to the company that then did that work, other areas of the original roof foam have since deteriorated because of a combination of wind, sun,
weather and substrate movement. The roof substrate is close to realizing its expected life. That contractor recommends 100 percent of the roof should
be refoamed and recoated at an estimated cost of nearly $500,000. Without the rehabilitation, the community would eventually be looking at spending
tens of millions of dollars on a new venue.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 37,500 -
Construction 507,500 -
Other - -
Total $ 545,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete
the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 0%
then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Potential: Type B Sales Tax, certificates of $ 545,000
general bonds, HOT
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No money is currently being spent on the roof, so there is no $ - - - - -
impact on the budget
budget.
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
None $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
The Coliseum hosts approximately 40 events per year, drawing more than 80,000 people.
Notes:
The SASSRA would certainly have a vested interest in seeing this project completed. The original estimate of $500,000 is 3 years old. I am adding a
3% increase per year to keep up with rising costs of material and labor.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $534,838
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 50 E. 43rd St. San Angelo Texas
61

351. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Convention Center Improvements
Responsible Dept: Civic Events Project Manager: Angelica Pena
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - 36,831 83,069 - - - - - $ 119,900
Description:
There are several key improvements that need to be made to the Convention Center in order to properly preserve & maintain the City's most oft used
facility . The renovation did not include the replacement of its 1978 marquee, which shows its age. The sign should be replaced with a modern-day
digital marquee. ($45,000) Secondly, a security system has never been installed and is greatly needed in order to protect the taxpayer's investment.
($50,000) Next, the Convention Center is in dire need of new tables and chair carts. More tables would eliminate the need to borrow tables from the
Stock Show & Rodeo Association or the Fort. ($13,400) Lastly, the foyer/box office area has a large area of wall space that at one time was occupied
with several small flat screen TV's. The purchase of a large 90" flat screen would offer opportuniutes for advertising revenue, informational posts, and
overall a more attractive appearance. ($11,500)
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction - -
Other 119,900 -
Total $ 119,900 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click Project Schedule: % Complete
on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… then find Design: 0%
picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
HOT fund balance and Type B $ 83,069
Type B Sales Tax left over from Convention $ 36,831
Center renovation
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Staff time savings on maintenance functions $ (1,200) (1,200) (1,200) (1,200) (1,200)
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
None $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Result & Efficiency: A new marquee would allow us to spolight more events, give us another tool for disseminating information and could yield
cost-efficiencies as a revenue generator through the selling of advertisements on it
Notes:
Citywise marketing may be able to help us recover costs by leveraging a sponsor who would have a static presence on the marquee. In addition they
may be able to sell advertising on the large flat screen TV.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $112,679
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 500 Rio Concho Drive San Angelo Texas
62

352. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Fort Concho Barracks 6 New Floor
Responsible Dept: Fort Concho Project Manager: Robert Bluthardt
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - 15,000 - - - - - $ 15,000
Description:
Fort and city staff replaced the flagstone floor with a poured concrete pad in the spring of 2011. All material and equipment costs were covered
by the Fort Concho Foundation. While the new pad has eliminated safety concerns and has increased usage by staff and renters, we seek
funding to complete the project with a period board floor. This would enhance both the appearance and function of this building space.
Supporting planning document(s):
2007 Site Review
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 1,000 -
Construction 14,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 15,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design: 2 months 0%
then click Browse…
Implementation: 6 months 0%
Browse to your picture,
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
Undetermined $ 15,000
Potential: HOT allocation
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Increased rental activity will cover any
I d t l ti it ill $ - - - - -
proportional increase in utilities.
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Staff time and materials to spot-repair this floor year-to-year. $ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,500 1,500
Performance Measures:
More rentals of facility; increased vendor income at site festivals.
Use and rental activity increases.
Notes:
Staff has estimated the project two ways: materials only with staff and inmate labor. The costs obviously increase if bid out as a total package.
Staff can perform this project with inmate labor in an efficient and proper manner. The Fort Concho Board and staff ranked this project in the top
five in its 2007 site review.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $14,720
Not Completing Project $5,646
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) Flipper St. & Burgess St. San Angelo Texas
63

353. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Heating and Cooling Unit Replacements at Fort Concho
Responsible Division: Fort Concho Project Manager: Bob Bluthardt
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - 125,000 20,000 15,000 - - - $ 160,000
Description:
This CIP project proposes to replace the obsolete and inefficient heating/cooling units at five of the fort's most used structures: Barracks 1 Visitor
Center, Officers' Quarters 1, Officers' Quarters 8, Quartermaster and Commissary. Also, we propose to add basic air conditioning to the Bay 3
Stables Hall. Rental activity at all structures, especially the Stables, has increased in recent years but the Stables is not useable without air
conditioning from May to September. These structures serve the public with public events and meetings, ongoing displays and programs, and
public service. Combined, these six structures consume over 1/3 of the total site power usage. These six structures also serve the majority of
site guests. Replacement would drastically decrease repair costs while reducing power consumption.
Supporting planning document(s):
Staff are compiling estimates for various replacement options at this time.
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 160,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 160,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design: N/A 0%
then click Browse…
Implementation: 2016 0%
Browse to your picture,
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
Undetermined. Potentially: $ 160,000
General Fund, HOT allocation, grants
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Ongoing repairs l
O i i less power savings
i $ 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Ongoing repairs and possible replacement and lost revenue $ 7,500 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000
Performance Measure:
Fewer equipment breakdowns; lower repair costs; fewer visitor & guest complaints; lower power consumption levels for same five buildings.
Notes:
Notes: Replacing older and inefficient HVAC units will result in both lower repair costs and power consumption. Adding air conditioning to the
Stables will increase usage and rental revenue.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $202,933
Not Completing Project $72,469
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 630 S. Oakes St. San Angelo Texas
64

354. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Fort Concho Post Bandstand
Responsible Dept: Fort Concho Project Manager: Robert Bluthardt
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - 25,000 - - - - - $ 25,000
Description:
Located at the west end of the Parade Ground, the Post Bandstand represents one of the last exterior improvements for site development. The
bandstand would enhance the site's appearance, provide a historic setting for public programs and concerts, and serve various community
groups. The Fort Concho Board is working with local professional building and trade groups to craft a reconstruction plan.
Supporting planning document(s):
2007 Site Review
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 25,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 25,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design: Fall 2012 100%
then click Browse…
Implementation: Summer 2013 0%
Browse to your picture,
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
Potential: Private funding, Fort Concho $ 25,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Utilities based on staff estimates.
Utiliti b d t ff ti t $ 250 250 250 250 250
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
None $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
New outdoor concerts; new public events.
Notes:
The Fort Concho Board and staff have ranked this project in the top five in its 2007 site review. Staff have estimated the materials for this project
at $15,000. Labor costs, if project is bid out, doubles overall costs.
Update/January 2009 Staff arranging meeting with San Angelo Home Builders Association to explore volunteer assistance in construction.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $25,716
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 700 Block of S. Oakes San Angelo Texas
65

355. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Fort Concho Visitors Center Restoration Improvements
Responsible Dept: Fort Concho Project Manager Robert Bluthardt
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - 100,000 750,000 250,000 400,000 - - $ 1,500,000
Description:
Barracks 1 was renovated as the fort's Visitor Center as part of the major 1995 Regional Urban Design Assessment Team projects that
transformed the surrounding acres into El Paseo de Santa Angela. Unfortunately, the project ran out of money and the east bay of Barracks 1
was left unfinished. A staff-board study has concluded that the restoration of this space must be tied to an overall building renovation to better
serve our guests. This renovation would include an expanded gift shop, visitor orientation area and theatre, climate controlled quality display
space, and administrative offices. Staff will partner with several area cultural agencies to complete a Cultural District Study in the spring of
2012. Formal planning of this Visitor Center will follow the recommendations of that study.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 100,000 -
Construction 1,400,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 1,500,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design: 2013 0%
then click Browse…
Implementation: 2017 0%
Browse to your picture,
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
Type B Sales Tax $ 1,000,000
Potential funding: San Angelo Health $ 500,000
Foundation, Meadows Foundation, and Houston
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Extra R
E t Revenue $ (10,000) (15,000) (17,500) (17,500) (17,500)
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Repairs and maintenance $ 5,000 7,500 15,000 17,500 20,000
Performance Measures:
Increased attendance: increased Gift Shop Sales; increased tour revenue; additional media attention
Notes:
Project will focus on barracks 1; possibly barracks 2 and maybe partial reconstruction of Barracks 3-4.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $1,356,718
Not Completing Project $60,739
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 630 S. Oakes San Angelo Texas
66

356. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Fort Concho OQ 1 Rear Room & Roof Repairs
Responsible Dept: Fort Concho Project Manager: Robert Bluthardt
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - 75,000 - - - - - $ 75,000
Description:
The rear room of Officers' Quarters 1 lacks a proper floor and the entire rear section is showing signs of structural distress. Staff recommends a
new concrete floor with a wooden floor to follow, relocation of utility pipes and lines, and new supports for the walls. A preliminary engineering
report was completed in 2008. As this building is the city's VIP quarters and serves many guests and functions, these improvements are both
aesthetic and functional to the building's future. The current room condition poses a major safety hazard to staff and contractors. Additionally,
the dormers are failing and need repair.
Supporting planning document(s):
2008 Engineering Report
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land -
Design 7,000 -
Construction 68,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 75,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design: 2-4 months 0%
then click Browse…
Implementation: 4-6 months 0%
Browse to your picture,
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
Undetermined $ 75,000
Potential: HOT allocation; private contributions -
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Utilities
Utiliti cost b
t based on current events.
d t t $ 750 750 750 750 750
Revenue increase 1,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Increase in building rentals.
Increase in overall building usage.
Notes:
Preliminary study by staff, and local architect; engineering report available. Full plans available in 60 days.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $83,747
Not Completing Project $72,469
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 111 East Ave. D San Angelo Texas
67

357. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Wayfinding Phases I-III
Responsible Dept: Development Services Project Manager: AJ Fawver
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 - - $ 300,000
Description:
Wayfinding refers to the system of signs & symbols placed at the entrances & throughout districts, campuses & more recently, entire cities. The San
Angelo Convention & Visitors Bureau, City of San Angelo, COSADC/Chamber of Commerce & Angelo State University have jointly funded the
development of a specifications & details manual for a city-wide wayfinding system was completed in 2010. Because one of the most frequently
heard complaints businesses and destination operators hear is that visitors and newcomers to the city have difficulty finding our many sites of
interest, cities must make the visitor/newcomer experience a positive one to ensure that tourists return and/or stay as long as possible. From an
aesthetic standpoint, signs such as those contained in a typical wayfinding system help designate certain areas as unique or interesting for
residents as well.
Supporting planning document(s):
Wayfinding contract between San Angelo CVB and The Douglas Group, Staff Report to City Council regarding wayfinding
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land 10,000 -
Design - -
Construction 270,000 -
Other 20,000 -
Total $ 300,000 $ -
Project Schedule: % Complete
Design: 50%
Implementation: 2012 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Undetermined $ 300,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Damaged sign replacement $ 500 500 500 500 500
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Performance Measure:
1.) Signs will be installed in three phases per the Wayfinding Master Plan. Performance will be measured by ability to fabricate and install
signs in accordance with the master plan. 2.) Increased visitorship at local tourist sites. 3.) Higher tourist satisfaction surveys (per CVB)
Notes:
Wayfinding signage, large and small, sends messages to the visitor, investor, and local citizens about the quality & character of the city, and
improve San Angelo's ability to attract and maintain economic development assets. Project locations have been outlined and preliminarily accepted
by the Wayfinding Steering Committee.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $285,922
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) City Wide San Angelo Texas
68

358. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Neighborhood Pedestrian Improvement Program
Responsible Dept: MPO Project Manager: Doray Hill, Jr.
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 - $ 5,000,000
Description:
Improve Pedestrian access in neighborhoods and around schools. To include sidewalks, sidewalk improvements, ped/bike crossing improvements,
off-street bike/ped facilities, bike lanes, bus shelters, improved crosswalks, and crosswalks. This project will be primarily for neighborhoods located
in northeast San Angelo.
Supporting planning document(s):
Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, Metropolitan Transportation Plan, Pedestrian-Transit Master Plan, COSA Comprehensive Plan
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 1,300,000 -
Construction 2,900,000 -
Other 800,000 -
Total $ 5,000,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: Fall 2013-Spring 2014 0%
then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: Fall 2014 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Transportation Alternatives Grant $ 4,000,000
20% Match/COSA General Fund $ 1,000,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
$ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
This project would have relatively low maintenance costs. $ - - 20,000 - 20,000
Once the infrastructure is completed, future costs would
inlcude re-stripping, minor sidewalk repairs and
signange replacement.
Performance Measures:
Provide a healthy alternative mode of transportation; Provide connectivity to areas of town; Provide non-motorized mobility; Improve neighborhood
aesthetics
Notes:
Project would be submitted under FHWA or FTA program grant call.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $4,727,076
Not Completing Project $37,105
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 1900 Ricks Drive San Angelo Texas
2) 120 E. 39th Street San Angelo Texas
3) 1202 East 22nd San Angelo Texas
69

359. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Santa Fe Train Depot Improvements
Responsible Division: Real Estate Division/Office of City Attorney Project Manager: Cindy M. Preas
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - 21,238 20,000 15,000 22,500 22,500 25,000 $ 126,238
Description:
The Historic Santa Fe Passenger Depot is on the National Register of Historic Places, and as such is an integral part of the City's history. It is
imperative that the City preserve the integrity of this great landmark. The Historic Orient-Santa Fe Depot was built in 1909 as the headquarters
for the Texas Corporation of the KCM&O. The City acquired the historic building on November 15, 1993 and soon entered into a lease with the
Historic Santa Fe Depot, Inc. for management of the historic building. The Depot celebrated its 100th anniversary in September 2010 and it
remains one of the most recognized and photographed landmarks in the City. Projects include Labor costs to replace damaged roof tiles
($12,500); termite treatment ($4,238), install new security lights (2,500), Repair Interior Ceiling ($2,000), Install Automated Fresh Air Intake and
Exhaust ($10,000), Repave/Seal Blacktop ($10,000), Install Ductless Air Conditioning System ($15,000) and Painting Exterior ($45,000).
Supporting planning document(s):
Annual Building Inspection Form
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction -
Other 126,238 -
Total $ 126,238 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design: 0%
then click Browse…
Implementation: 2014 0%
Browse to your picture,
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
Undetermined $ 126,238
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
None $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
None $ - - - - -
Performance Measure:
Increase in visitor and public bookings.
Notes:
In April 2008, a major storm hit San Angelo, causing damage to the tile roof, three ceiling water blisters in the interior, window damage, and
dormer damage. Subsequently, the damage has progressed. Additionally, parking lot shows signs of stress due to the weight of transit buses.
In 2009, the City spent $49,360 in painting the exterior of the Depot and installing new gutters. In 2012 the City repaired the dormer windows
and purchased replacement roof tiles.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $117,954
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 703 S. Chadbourne San Angelo Texas
70

360. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Spur Parking Garage Renovation and Repair
Responsible Division: Real Estate Div./Office of the City Attorney Project Manager: Cindy Preas
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - 1,825,000 - - - - - $ 1,825,000
Description:
The Spur Parking Garage services the downtown area including the new Stephen Central Library. The Spur Parking Garage must be renovated
and repaired to meet City code regulations. Project: Primary Structural Steel Members must be: Cleaned and Sandblasted; apply coating and
paint for rust protection; reinforce and/or replace specific structural steel members. Replacing existing staircase in its entirety. In addition,
include the demolition of existing second, third and fourth level floor systems. Floor system removal will include removal or existing steel decks
and reinforced concrete support slabs. Other features may include removal of any existing light poles and fixtures, restriping, tire stop
replacement and updated signs.
Supporting planning document(s):
Forensic Report, Construction Documents of Plans and Specifications, Survey, Lab Testing, Attorney Fees
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 50,000 -
Construction 1,500,000 -
Other 275,000 -
Total $ 1,825,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design: 0%
then click Browse…
Implementation: 2014 0%
Browse to your picture,
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
Undetermined $ 1,825,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
None $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Loss of Revenue - Garage closed $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000
Performance Measure:
Public Safety
Property Revenue will increase based on rental parking slots.
Notes:
In October 2010, the structural integrity of the Sppur Parking Garage was assessed to determine the factors contributing to the corrosion of steel
components. On March 5, 2011, floors 2-4 were closed and use prohibited after load analysis revealed the primary structural building steel
components cannot withstand the associated loading and will require bracing in the transverse direction.
It is recommended the project be completed in one phase ($1,825,000). If project is broken up into three phases costs are considerably higher
($2,950,000). Saving if completed as one phase $1,125,000
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $1,790,972
Not Completing Project $94,542
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 30 W Twohig Avenue San Angelo Texas
71

361. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
29th Street Complex Renovation
Responsible Division: Parks & Recreation Project Manager: Carl White
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - - 1,650,000 - - - - $ 1,650,000
Description:
The intent of the renovation is to co-locate Lake View and Northern Little Leagues at the 29th Street Complex location in order to maximize efficiencies, minimize
maintenance costs and to provide these leagues with new fields and facilities. The current intent is to develop two small complexes with three fields each (two standard
and one t-ball) with separate concession and restrooms or one four-field quad with a shared building with restrooms and possibly separate concessions and two
separate t-ball fields. Of course parking, lighting and other improvements would need to be made.Lake View Little League currently plays on three fields (two standard
and one t-ball) on SAISD property east of Lake View High School. The City provides all landscape maintenance. The League provides facility maintenance and
programming. Relocation of Lake View Little League would eliminate the City’s cost of maintenance at this location which currently runs about $36,000/year. Northern
Little League currently plays on one field at the 29th Street Complex (the only field remaining after the complex was converted to mostly open space) and four fields at
the 19th Street location (counting the challenger field). The City provides all landscape maintenance. The League provides facility maintenance and programming.
Relocation of Northern Little League and conversion of the 19th Street location to practice fields (challenger field to remain) would reduce the City’s cost for
maintenance from about $48,000/year to roughly $20,000/year. The current cost to maintain the 29th Street Complex is about $60,000 (down from about $120,000 prior
to conversion). Again, the City only provides landscape maintenance at this location which is leased from the United States Army Corps of Engineers.
Supporting planning document(s):
2001 and 2005 Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 100,000 -
Construction 1,550,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 1,650,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design: 2014/2015 0%
then click Browse…
Implementation: 2014/2015 0%
Browse to your picture,
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
Type B Sales Tax $ 1,650,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Operations and Maintenance $ 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000
Close Lake View Little League (36,000) (36,000) (36,000) (36,000) (36,000)
Reduce Northern Little League (28,000) (28,000) (28,000) (28,000) (28,000)
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Performance Measure:
To increase the number of fields from 4 practice fields to 4 fully-improved little league and 2 t-ball fields; to allow for approximately 55 teams to play at the
renovated complex; to allow for approximately 550 children to participate in little league baseball at the complex.
Notes:
Project currently on hold, as of December 2012, due to maintenance cost commitment.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $1,615,625
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 2929 Golf Course Rd San Angelo Texas
72

362. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Community Aquatics Facility
Responsible Dept: Recreation Project Manager: MaryAnn Vasquez
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ 3,219,787 42,635 - - - - - $ 3,262,422
Description:
Build a regional water park for all ages to promote tourism and economic growth in San Angelo. The City of San Angelo maintains and operates
one Municipal Swimming Pool, built in 1938. A Community Aquatics Facility would provide the City of San Angelo and the region with a new
recreational attraction with all the elements of a major water theme park. The new Aquatics Facility will be constructed on City-owned land along the
Concho River enhancing the river. The park will provide an additional entertainment venue for the citizens of San Angelo and the Concho Valley
region during the hot summer months. Security system installed December 2012. Landscaping is remaining.
Supporting planning document(s):
Parks and Recreation Open Space Master Plans 2001 and 2005
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 255,000 270,565
Construction 2,650,000 2,789,318
Other 357,422 177,539
Total $ 3,262,422 $ 3,237,422
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design: March 2011 99%
then click Browse…
Construction: May 2011-2012 0%
Browse to your picture,
Opening: April 2012 0%
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
Type B Sales Tax Funds $ 3,241,197
Donation from Historic Preservation and $ 21,225
Old Town Conservancy
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Salaries $ 155,500 $ 160,000 165,000 170,000 175,000
Utilities 80,000 85,000 90,000 95,000 100,000
Operations and Maintenance 55,000 60,000 65,000 70,000 75,000
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Loss of revenue from existing pool $ 50,000 52,000 54,000 56,000 58,000
Performance Measures:
Estimated revenue of $122,000.
Notes:
Project substantially complete April 2012 and opened Memorial weekend. Revenues for the season exceeded expectations at $188,000.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $1,553,119
Not Completing Project $254,906
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 18 E. Ave A San Angelo Texas
73

363. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Air Conditioning at Recreation Centers
Responsible Division: Parks and Recreation Project Manager: MaryAnn Vasquez
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - - 500,000 - - - - $ 500,000
Description:
Install air conditioning units at each Recreation Center (Carl Ray and Southside). Currently the centers do not have air conditioning, the gyms and
meetings do have heating. The summer temperatures in the gym reach over 100 degrees. The gyms are rarely used until 6 pm because of the
extreme heating conditions. All programming takes place in the mornings before Noon, limiting the number of paid campers to 60. Limited athletic
programs take place after 6 pm but the gyms are still extremely hot for players and fans.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction - -
Other 500,000 -
Total $ 500,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design: 2014 0%
then click Browse…
Implementation: 2014 0%
Browse to your picture,
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
Undetermined $ 500,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Increased electrical costs $ 50,000 55,000 60,000 65,000 70,000
Increased revenue for summer camps & sport leagues (12,500) (12,500) (12,500) (12,500) (12,500)
Operations and Maintenance
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Performance Measure:
Increase the revenue program opportunities to include the use of the gym, currently no program takes place from Noon-6:00 pm.
Notes:
2-22-12: have had discussions with facilities maintenance about installation of cool roof and other alternatives that may be cost effective in cooling
the gym portion of the building.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $705,174
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 111 Santa Fe Park Drive San Angelo Texas
2) Ben Ficklin San Angelo Texas
74

364. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Youth Soccer Complex at Glenna St
Responsible Dept: Parks & Recreation Project Manager: Carl White
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$195,000 75,000 - - - - - $ 270,000
Description:
Phase I-Lighting of two areas to include four additional fields. Increase participation for league and tournament play, with a direct economic impact
on the sales tax dollars. Opportunity to invite and host more teams during league and tournament games. Installation of 1000 ft safety fence along
Glenna Street to prevent errant balls from landing in the street, providing safety for the players and fans.
Phase II-Repair of large parking lot, overlay and re-striping of current parking lot. Games attract a large number of fans. Addressing the limited
parking and unmarked spaces will prevent accidents.
Supporting planning document(s):
Parks and Recreation Open Space Master Plans 2001 and 2005
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 270,000 195,000
Other - -
Total $ 270,000 $ 195,000
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design: 100%
then click Browse…
Implementation: 72%
Browse to your picture,
Phase I 100%
then click Insert and Ok.
Phase II 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Type B Sales Tax $ 270,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Maintenance provided by SASA $ - - - - -
No Impact
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No Impact $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Increase the number of games which can be played in the evening by up to six, depending on the time of year
Notes:
Phase I Improvements - irrigation, lighting, and safety fence were completed and installed in March 2008. Phase II parking lot paving and additional
parking improvements are anticipated to be completed in 13/14. NOTE: Phase II is awaiting coordination with the San Angelo Soccer Association
(SASA) who is covering 1/2 of the cost of the project. As of December 2012, we are still waiting on SASA for their matching funds.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $75,000
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 1601 Glenna St San Angelo Texas
75

365. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Bradford Neighborhood & School Park
Responsible Division: Parks Project Manager: Carl White
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
175,000 - - - - - $ 175,000
Description:
To develop the existing undeveloped property adjacent to the new Bradford Elementary School (property owned by SAISD) as a neighborhood and
school park. Development would include a small pavilion or picnic shelter, some unique playground equipment to complement the equipment at the
school, walkways, practice ball field space, some lighting, some irrigation, and some other basic park amenities.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 5,000 -
Construction 170,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 175,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design: 2013 0%
then click Browse…
Implementation: Spring 2014 0%
Browse to your picture,
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
Type B Sales Tax $ 175,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Operations and Maintenance $ - 17,500 17,850 18,200 18,550
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Performance Measure:
To create park visitation to an anticipated rate of 10,830 visitors each year.
Notes:
Joint park development project with SAISD. Interlocal cooperation agreement with SAISD should be complete in March 2013. Design process will
begin after that.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $242,486
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 1202 E. 22nd St. San Angelo Texas
76

366. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Brentwood Neighborhood Park Renovation
Responsible Dept: Parks Project Manager: Carl White
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - - 275,000 - - - $ 275,000
Description:
Renovate the existing neighborhood park with a picnic shelter/pavilion, a playground, walkways, lighting, and landscaping. This project was
identified as needed due to several reasons: the playground equipment does not meet current national safety standards and has outlived its
reasonable lifespan of up to twenty years; walkways are not fully accessible; picnic shelter/pavilions are recognized as highly needed by both the
2001 and 2005 updated Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan; the existing irrigation system is poor; park and security lighting needs to
be improved; and the aesthetic quality of the park needs to be improved. This project will also include development of the 2003, 4 acre addition to
this park with the Jefferson Street pond with walkways, pond access, picnic tables, benches, etc. Brentwood Park was developed in the late 1950's
and early 1960's.
Supporting planning document(s):
2001 and 2005 updated Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan
Parks Department internal needs assessments
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 10,000 -
Construction 265,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 275,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete
the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 0%
then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Implementation: 2014/2015 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Type B sales tax $ 275,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Based on renovation value. $ - - 15,000 15,250 15,500
Operations and Maintenance
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Increase park visitation from an estimated 10,830 visitors each year to an estimated 16,245 visitors each year
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $307,267
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 1300 Block Howard San Angelo Texas
77

367. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Brown Neighborhood Park Renovation
Responsible Dept: Parks Project Manager: Carl White
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - - 175,000 - - - $ 175,000
Description:
Renovate the existing neighborhood park with a picnic shelter/pavilion, a playground, walkways, lighting, and landscaping. This project was
identified as needed due to several reasons: the playground equipment does not meet current national safety standards and has outlived its
reasonable lifespan of up to twenty years; walkways are not fully accessible; picnic shelter/pavilions are recognized as highly needed by both the
2001 and 2005 updated Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan; the existing irrigation system is poor; park and security lighting needs to
be improved; and the aesthetic quality of the park needs to be improved. Brown Park was developed in 1952 and has not been renovated since
that time.
Supporting planning document(s):
2001 and 2005 updated Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan
Parks Department internal needs assessments
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 5,000 -
Construction 170,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 175,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete
the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 2015 0%
then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Implementation: 2016 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Type B sales tax $ 175,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Operations and Maintenance $ - - - 12,000 12,500
Based on renovation value
value.
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Increase park visitation from an estimated 5,415 visitors each year to an estimated 10,830 visitors each year
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $187,898
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 300 Block Johnson Street and W Twohig Ave. San Angelo Texas
78

368. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Central Control Irrigation
Responsible Dept: Parks & Recreation Project Manager: Carl White
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - 110,500 - - - - - $ 110,500
Description:
The City recently purchased the components needed to set up the new Rio Concho Sports Complex and Community Park with a central control
irrigation system. Park's staff is installing, in-house, the central control irrigation system controller at 18 park and sports field sites (22 controllers).
This type of computerized automated system will allow the staff to control the settings, troubleshoot, receive data on problematic irrigation systems,
monitor and utilize evapotranspiration data, etc. from a single office location. The conservation of water and the reduction of costs will be greatly
improved with this new system. Substantial amounts of time (labor), fuel, and water will be saved. In addition, this controller system could also be
used in future years to monitor/control lights at these locations, which would decrease the costs for labor, fuel, and electricity as well.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 10,000 -
Construction -
Other 100,500 104,611
Total $ 110,500 $ 104,611
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design: 100%
then click Browse…
Implementation: 2013 95%
Browse to your picture,
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
Type B sales tax $110,500
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
General fund savings for labor, fuel, and water $ (54,000) (56,700) (59,500) (62,200) (64,900)
(Funds listed describe cost savings per year)
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Labor, fuel, and water $ - 2,700 5,500 8,200 10,900
Performance Measure:
Annual water costs decreased up to 20% at these sites; Labor reduced by 450 man hours; Fuel reduced by 100 gallons for the Irrigation crews.
Notes:
The cost for purchasing and installing central control systems is $5,000 per irrigation controller site. Parks is requesting 22 sites. As of December
2012, project is 95% complete and should be fully completed March 2013.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $(170,086)
Not Completing Project $25,324
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) City wide San Angelo Texas
79

369. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Civic League Park, Additional Improvements (IWLC Basin 4)
Responsible Dept: Parks & Recreation Project Manager: Carl White
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - 115,000 - - - - - $ 115,000
Description:
This improvement was programmed during the design of the last expansion of the International Waterlily Collection. A shortage of funding however
did not permit its implementation. Specifically, this improvement project includes the addition of the fourth raised basin in the northeast quadrant of
the collection site (see picture below). Design was completed in 2004, however that design is being modified to be completed at a later date.
Supporting planning document(s):
Design plans complete from 2004
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 100,000 -
Other 15,000 -
Total $ 115,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design: 2013 0%
then click Browse…
Implementation: 2013/2014 0%
Browse to your picture,
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
Potential Grant Funding $ 100,000
Potential funding from San Angelo Area $ 15,000
Foundation
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Increased use of water, supplies, electricity, and cleaning $ - 2,000 2,050 2,100 2,150
Operations and Maintenance
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
N/A $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Increase the number of lilies displayed from 210 to 240 at the collection display
Increase the number of visitors from an estimated 12,635 each year to an estimated 14,440 each year
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $120,624
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 900 W Beauregard and N Park San Angelo Texas
80

370. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Fairmount Cemetery -- Phase I Improvements
Responsible Dept: Parks & Recreation Project Manager: Carl White
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - - 600,000 - - - - $ 600,000
Description:
Phase I of the Friends of Fairmount Master Plan recommended improvements which includes a new wider and more attractive entrance to
Fairmount Cemetery and the first set of 2 columbaria (2 out of 6) on a closed internal road on the south side of the cemetery. The project includes
design, construction and some limited landscaping.
Supporting planning document(s):
Friends of Fairmount Cemetery Master Plan adopted by City Council on July 17, 2012.
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 60,000 -
Construction 500,000 -
Other 40,000 -
Total $ 600,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0%
then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Friends of Fairmount funding $ 600,000
Undetermined
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Operations and Maintenance $ - - 5,000 5,100 5,200
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
$ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
allow for new revenue stream with sale of columbaria niches estimated at $25,000/year for over 20 years.
increase safety and thus reduce accidents entering and exiting the cemetery.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $592,022
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 1120 West Avenue N. San Angelo Texas
81

371. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Hilltop Trail at Lake Nasworthy
Responsible Dept: Parks & Recreation Project Manager: Carl White
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - 200,000 - - - - - $ 200,000
Description:
This project includes the development of a 1.5 mile trail on the top of the hill at Hillside Drive and Gun Club Road. The proposed trail would be about
14 feet wide and constructed of crushed limestone. Signage would also be included.
Supporting planning document(s):
Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan adopted by City Council on October 16, 2012.
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 15,000 -
Construction 180,000 -
Other 5,000 -
Total $ 200,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0%
then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Potential TPWD Trails Grant $ 160,000
Potential Lake Nasworthy Trust Fund Interest $ 40,000
Account
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Ongoing Maintenance $ - 4,000 4,100 4,200 4,300
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
None $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Improve safety by reducing pedestrian traffic off Hillside Drive
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $211,807
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 2100 Gun Club Rd. San Angelo Texas
82

372. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Middle Concho Park Main Boat Ramp Improvements
Responsible Dept: Parks and Recreation Project Manager: Carl White
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - 471,000 - - - - - $ 471,000
Description:
Project includes the complete renovation of the main boating ramp at Middle Concho Park at Lake Nasworthy. The ramp would be widened from 2
to 4 lanes, additional parking would be provided, a new restroom facility with showers would be added, lighting improvements made, new signage
added and improvements to walkways made and docking made. This project includes design work and permitting costs.
Supporting planning document(s):
Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan adopted by City Council on October 16, 2012.
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 34,000 -
Construction 425,000 -
Other 12,000 -
Total $ 471,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0%
then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Potential TPWD State Boating Access Grant $ 353,250
Potential Lake Nasworthy Trust Fund Interest $ 117,750
Account
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Operating and Maintenance $ - 5,000 5,100 5,200 5,300
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
$ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
increase the Middle Concho Park entrance gate fee revenues by an estimated 15-20 % due to increased usage.
double the number of boats that can utilize the ramp at one time from 2 to 4.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $481,500
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) Middle Concho East & West/Red Bluff Rd. San Angelo Texas
83

373. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Red Arroyo Trail
Responsible Dept: Parks & Recreation Project Manager: Clinton Bailey
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - 3,200,000 400,000 400,000 - - - $ 4,000,000
Description:
The Red Arroyo Trail project has been a dream for many for a long time. The vision for this project is to develop a multiple-use trail system along the
Red Arroyo from Sherwood Way in the West to Knickerbocker Road in the East and South from the confluence near College Hills Blvd. to Sunset
Drive. This project will provide for an excellent alternative transportation network as well as a fantastic amenity for recreation. Included with this
project will be a 3-mile, 10' wide multiple-use trail (for non-motorized travel); three small parking areas; at least three small pocket parks; an 18-hole
disc golf course; some landscaping; an off-leash area for dogs; some lighting; signage; drinking fountains; benches; and restroom facilities. As of
December 2012, we are about 60% complete with design, which is being performed by City Staff.
Supporting planning document(s):
Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan (2001) and Update (2005); San Angelo Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (2005);
MPO Bike and Pedestrian Trail Plan 2006.
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 300,000 -
Construction 3,665,000 -
Other 35,000 -
Total $ 4,000,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design: 2012 60%
then click Browse…
Implementation: 2014/2015 0%
Browse to your picture,
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
State Grant $3,200,000
Type B sales tax $325,000
Stormwater funding $325,000
Private fundraising $150,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Based on proposed design and current rates of maintenance $ - - $75,000 $75,500 $76,000
for lighting, landscape services, and general cleaning and
Operations and Maintenance
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Increase the number of non-motorized vehicle transportation connection by about 3 miles; generate an estimated 43,320 users each year.
Notes:
$3,200,000 in funding secured from TPWD Grant
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $4,187,838
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) varied -- runs from Sherwood Way in the West San Angelo Texas
2) to Knickerbocker in the East to Sunset Drive
3) in the South
84

374. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Rio Vista Neighborhood Park Renovation
Responsible Dept: Parks & Recreation Department Project Manager: Carl White
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ 762,907 50,993 - - - - - - $ 813,900
Description:
Renovate the existing neighborhood park with a picnic shelter/pavilion, a playground, walkways, lighting, and landscaping. This project was
identified as needed due to several reasons: the playground equipment does not meet current national safety standards and has outlived its
reasonable lifespan of up to twenty years; walkways are not fully accessible; picnic shelter/pavilions are recognized as highly needed by both the
2001 and 2005 updated Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan; the existing irrigation system is in poor condition; park and security
lighting needs to be improved; and the aesthetic quality of the park needs to be improved. Rio Vista Park was developed in 1971 and has not been
renovated since that time. City to install playgrounds and trails in-house.
Supporting planning document(s):
2001 and 2005 updated Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan
Parks Department internal needs assessments
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 65,000 65,000
Construction 748,900 697,907
Other - -
Total $ 813,900 $ 762,907
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Design: Spring 2011 100%
then click Browse…
Implementation: Spring 2012 93%
Browse to your picture,
Completion: Spring 2013
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
Section 108 Loan & CDBG Funds $ 711,000
4B Half-Cent Sales Tax Funds $ 97,900
Donation from Architect $5,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Operations and Maintenance $ 15,000 15,750 16,500 17,250 18,000
Based on some additional improvements to the park
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Increase park visitation from an estimated 7,220 visitors each year to an estimated 12,635 visitors each year
Notes:
Project is mostly complete. As of December 2012, contractor has reached substantial completion. City to install playgrounds and walking trail.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $128,856
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) Ben Ficklin Rd. and Ave. X San Angelo Texas
85

375. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Rio Concho Community Park & Texas Bank Sports Complex
Responsible Dept: Parks & Recreation Project Manager: Carl White
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - - 85,000 - - 565,000 $ 650,000
Description:
This project is to add elements to the Rio Concho Community Park & Texas Bank Sports Complex that were originally envisioned such as a pavilion
next to the playgrounds and a restroom facility at quad 4. This project also includes a restroom at quad 2 which was not originally envisioned but is
now needed based on our experience with rentals, events and tournaments. The pavilion is needed because the park is intended to serve as a
community park but currently can't meet that need unless a pavilion is added which would help to better host community events, private events and
general park usage.
Supporting planning document(s):
2012 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan.
Parks and Recreation internal needs assessment.
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 35,000 -
Construction 615,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 650,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete
the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 0%
then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: 2014 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Type B sales tax $ 89,500
Undetermined $ 560,500
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Operations and maintenance. $ - 3,000 3,075 3,150 3,225
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Pavilion: to increase community park attendance from an estimated 5,415 to an anticipated 14,600 visitors each year.
Restrooms: to increase the number of tournaments, rentals and special events.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $93,512
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 1822 River Dr. San Angelo Texas
86

376. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Santa Rita Neighborhood Park Renovation
Responsible Dept: Parks & Recreation Project Manager: Carl White
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - - - - 150,000 - - $ 150,000
Description:
Renovate the existing neighborhood park to meet the desires of the neighborhood (Greater Santa Rita Home Owners' Association) and adjacent
Santa Rita Elementary School. Improvements could likely include a new irrigation system, walkways, lighting, unique play features, tennis court
refurbishment, picnic areas, some landscaping and general park improvements.
Supporting planning document(s):
2012 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan.
Parks and Recreation internal needs assessment.
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 10,000 -
Construction 140,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 150,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in Project Schedule: % Complete
the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, Design: 0%
then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok. Implementation: 2016/2017 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Type B sales tax $ 89,500
Potential Homeowner Association fundraising $ 60,500
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Operations and Maintenance $ - - - 15,000 15,375
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
To create park visitation to an anticipated rate of 10,830 visitors each year.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $167,019
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 1111 S. Madison St. San Angelo Texas
87

377. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
South Concho Park Main Boat Ramp Improvements
Responsible Dept: Parks and Recreation Project Manager: Carl White
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - 438,600 - - - - $ 438,600
Description:
Project includes the complete renovation of the main boating ramp at South Concho Park at Lake Nasworthy. The ramp would be widened from 2 to
4 lanes, additional parking would be provided, a new restroom facility with showers would be added, lighting improvements made, new signage
added and improvements to walkways made and docking made. This project includes design work and permitting costs.
Supporting planning document(s):
Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan adopted by City Council on October 16, 2012.
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 32,000 -
Construction 395,000 -
Other 11,600 -
Total $ 438,600 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0%
then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Potential TPWD State Boating Access Grant $ 328,950
Potential Lake Nasworthy Trust Fund Interest $ 109,650
Account
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Operating and Maintenance $ - - 8,000 8,150 8,300
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
None $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
Double the number of boats that can utilize the ramp at one time from 2 to 4.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $445,070
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 850 South Concho Dr. San Angelo Texas
88

378. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Sunken Garden Park and Sculpture Garden
Responsible Dept: Parks & Recreation Project Manager: Carl White
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - - - - - 275,000 $0 $ 275,000
Description:
Landscape refurbishment of Sunken Garden Park with enhancements to improve access and enjoyment of the new Sculpture Garden.
Improvements to include a new irrigation system, new turf in targeted locations, improved accessibility with ramps and stairs, walkways to and
around the sculptures and improved lighting.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design 25,000 -
Construction 250,000 -
Other - -
Total $ 275,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 2017 0%
then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 2018 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Undetermined $ 275,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
None $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
None $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
increase visitation to the park and sculpture garden by about 12,000 visitors a year.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $250,288
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 704 S. David Street San Angelo Texas
89

379. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Concho River Dredging, Bank Stabilization, & Trails Improvements
Responsible Dept: Parks & Recreation Project Manager: Carl White
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ 6,853,196 8,583,451 - - - - - - $ 15,436,647
Description:
Design and construction of the North Concho River Parks and Trail system, located along the course of the North Concho River from Kirby Community
Park to Rio Concho Community Park. Design and construction of all physical improvements in the area including trails, lookout points, bank
stabilization, lighting, signage and accessibility and connectivity improvements with the following exception. The section of the project from Kirby Park
(south side) to 14th Street will only be conceptually designed. Improvements will focus on connectivity and access to the river, provision of desirable
destination spaces and maximizing public recreation opportunities and interaction with the river. Project also included substantial dredging of portions
of the river, primarily between Houston Harte and 14th Street, under supervision of the UCRA. About 1.5 million cubic feet of silt were removed. Project
includes trail section on SAHF property on south side of river from Irving St. upriver to Girl Scout HQs and trail section from Bell St. terminus and
across Bell St to the river overlook at the Rio Concho Community Park
Supporting planning document(s):
2004 KDC-Turner Study; hydrogeological assessments
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land 1,034,574 1,034,574
Design 1,531,301 1,531,301
Construction 12,482,115 7,318,763
Other 388,657 388,657
Total $ 15,436,647 $ 10,273,295
Project Schedule: % Complete
Design: 2006 - 2012 100%
Implementation: 2009 - 2013 59%
Funding Sources: Amount
Type B sales tax $ 12,993,175
Federal, State, and Local Grants $ 1,856,012
storm water improvements funding $ 587,460
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Operating and Maintenance Costs $ - 100,000 102,000 104,000 106,000
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - -
Performance Measures:
Increase the overall river parks and trail system use from an estimated 200,000 visitors annually to over 250,000 visitors annually
Improve the quality of the water in the river in the areas dredged by up to 15%
Notes:
Dredging is complete and was conducted from about 14th Street downriver to about the point where Sulphur Draw feeds into the river.
Bank stabilization and other improvements began October 2011. As of December 2012, the improvement project is at about 60% completion overall,
counting contractor's work and in-house work. The project is anticipated to be substantially complete August 2013. Bank stabilization of the section
from Sulpher Draw upriver to 1st Street was approved and funed.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $8,969,084
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) O. C. Fisher Reservoir Dam to Bell Street San Angelo Texas
2) impoundment
90

380. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Public Information Equipment Replacement
Responsible Dept: Public Information Project Manager: Anthony Wilson
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - 17,936 19,874 4,668 5,378 - - - $ 47,856
Description:
The Public Information Office lacks adequate backup equipment for when technology inevitably fails. PIO also lacks adequate funding to
systematically purchase replacement and/or backup photography, videography and computer equipment, all of which is necessary to disseminate
information -- particularly the airing of City Council and board meetings -- to the public. Health Services has applied for a public health emergency
preparedness discretionary funds state grant that would fund 90% of the cost of a new server for Channel 17. (The remaining 10% will come from
the PIO's operating budget.) That would leave another $29,920 in equipment needs: $19,874 for video equipment in the City Council chambers,
$4,668 in videography equipment, and $5,378 in photo equipment.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction - -
Other 47,856 -
Total $ 47,856 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0%
then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Public Health Emergency State Grant $ 16,142
Undetermined $ 31,714
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Repair costs reduced $ (1,000) (1,000) (1,000) (1,000) (1,000)
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
We would face repair costs that could be small. $ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
Eventually, we would have to replace equipment through
the operating budget.
Performance Measures:
Number of Council and board meetings aired, number of original programs produced, number of photos posted online.
Notes:
Council chambers equipment: Sony Anycast Station Live Content Producer, $12,999; 4 Robotic Cameras, $3,280; HDD DVD recorder, $3,595.
Channel 17 server: $17,936; Videography equipment: Sony HVR-NX5U camera, $3,999; Sony HXR-FMU128 Flash Memory Unit, $669;
Photography equipment: Canon EOS 7D SLR Digital Camera Body, $1599; Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Zoom Lens, $1,179; Canon EF70-
200mm f/2.8 IS II USM Telephoto Lens, $2,099; Canon Speedlight 580EX II Flash, $501
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $42,291
Not Completing Project $4,727
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 500 Rio Concho Drive San Angelo Texas
91

381. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Communications Technology Upgrade
Responsible Dept: Public Safety Communications Project Manager: Victor Vasquez
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ 117,000 120,000 - - - 130,000 150,000 $ 517,000
Description:
This hardware update includes the actual computer equipment (servers) that our Intergraph software needs to operate on. This also includes the
operating systems and the backup solutions so that records are securely stored. The servers are currently Dell servers, and Dell does not support
servers over 4 years old. All information transmitted to Public Safety personnel must be accurate and up-to-date. It is imperative we (Public Safety)
stay current on the technology for citizen, firemen and officer safety.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction - -
Other 517,000 117,000
Total $ 517,000 $ 117,000
Insert a picture of your proposed project here.
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…
Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on the tab Create from File,
Phase 1 2008 100%
then click Browse…
Phase 2 2013 0%
Browse to your picture,
then click Insert and Ok.
Funding Sources: Amount
General Fund $ 117,000
Undetermined $ 400,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No significant change in operating costs. $ -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
Increase in repair costs as equipment will be out of $ - 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000
maintenance
Performance Measures:
New technology is required to maintain a higher standard of performance and public safety. Communications had a total 209,764 calls in 2011.
Without reliable computers the Public Safety Communications would not be able to dispatch services to the Citizens of San Angelo.
Notes:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $117,763
Not Completing Project $37,875
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 323 E. Beauregard San Angelo Texas
92

382. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Mobile Data Terminals
Responsible Dept: Fire Project Manager: Brian Dunn
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - - 182,600 - - - - - $ 182,600
Description:
This is the moblie data terminals for the ambulances and fire trucks. The current version we are using is obsolete and we can't purchase parts
when they break. The police department has already switched to the system we are asking for.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction 182,600 -
Other - -
Total $ 182,600 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0%
then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Possibly out of new unattached ambulance $ 182,600
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
We will have to budget about $8500 per year for air card $ 8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500
costs.
costs
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
We have to have a system to operate. $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
This will positively impact response times
Notes:
If this isn't updated it will have an impact on response times.
30 MDT'S @ $4,110 = $123,300----- 30 MOUNTS @ $475 = $14,250------- 35 AIRCARDS @ $50 = $1,750--- 6 TABLETS FOR THE
AMBULANCES @ $3,800 = $22,800 ---WIRE 4 STATIONS AS HOTSPOTS @ $3,000 = $12,000--- ONE YEAR OF AIRTIME FOR AIRCARDS
$8,500
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $219,375
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) City Wide San Angelo Texas
93

383. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Server Upgrades
Responsible Dept: Information Technology Project Manager: John Eades
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ 100,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 - $ 250,000
Description:
The IT Department has increased the amount of servers from 35 to 37 and anticipate purchasing another 3 within the next year to replace old
servers. Due to the increase in servers, we have also needed to add racks, battery backups (UPS), wire management, and remote console
appliances. With the increase of servers, switches, and routers, we are requesting we increase our yearly maintenance to $35,000. In order to stay
current with technology and maintain optimal proficiency, our servers/switches/routers/UPS's should be replaced on a 4 to 5 year plan. Rotation
upgrades of the Core Servers include: Exchange Email Server, Authentication Servers, Antivirus server, Mail Security, Content Filtering, GIS
Servers, AS/400, Risk Server, Intranet Server, Click2Gov Server, Channel 17 Distribution Server, Airport File Server, VoIP phone servers, Storage
Backup Units, Infrastructure Switches, Routers, UPS, and Firewall Security.
Supporting planning document(s):
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction - -
Other 250,000 125,000
Total $ 250,000 $ 125,000
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0%
then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: On Going 47%
Funding Sources: Amount
General Fund $ 250,000
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
No impact $ - - - - -
Performance Measures:
IT work orders completed same day-2451 or 60% Network up time-99.872% AS400 time available 87.45%
Notes:
IT has been working on server virtualization. This allows us to run more servers on fewer physical servers. We have 3 physical Servers running 11
Virtual Servers.
IT is working on Thin Client deployment. Desktop PCs are replaced with a less expensive server clients saving money on PC purchases. As thin
client use increases, another server may become necessary, thereby increasing the cost and number of server upgrades.
Increase disk storage capacity for the GIS Maps, Y drive, Z drive, and system backups
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $143,777
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 72 W College San Angelo Texas
94

384. City of San Angelo, Texas
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Purchase IBM Power 7 Server
Responsible Dept: Information Technology Project Manager: John Eades
Financial Plan:
Prior Budget Projected
Years 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total
$ - 65,000 - - - - - $ 65,000
Description:
Purchase a new IBM Power 7 Server (8202 Model E4C) to replace the IBM iSeries 520 AS400, 8 years old, that is reaching end of life. Future
releases of the HTE software will require higher levels of the IBM operating system. The IBM Power 7 Server system will run the entire city's
financials, water billing, permits, work orders, inventory, fleet management, and other modules.
Supporting planning document(s):
No supporting documents at this time. Working with IBM and Sungard to determine correct computer configuration and price.
The cost is estimated.
Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-Date
ROW/Easements/Land - -
Design - -
Construction - -
Other 65,000 -
Total $ 65,000 $ -
Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Project Schedule: % Complete
Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… Design: 0%
then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert. Implementation: 0%
Funding Sources: Amount
Saving on the three years of software and $ 65,000
hardware maintenance
Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
$ - - - - -
Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
City will not be able to update the HTE software at some $ - - - - -
unspecifed time in the near future. Working with Sungard
to determine that date
Performance Measures:
Notes:
Software Maintenance for the AS400 increased 25%, based on the age of the AS400, to $7,700.00.
The City will not be able to update the HTE software at some unspecified time in the near future. Currently working with Sungard to determine that
date. This project needs to be funded in advance in order for the maintenance savings to occur.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Completing Project $63,788
Not Completing Project Undetermined
Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):
Address: Street Address City State
1) 72 W College San Angelo Texas
95

385. City of San Angelo
2013‐2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Level 3 Future Projects
Total Project
Project Type Division Project Title Proposed Funding Costs
City Operation Facility Emergency Mgmt Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Generator Replacement General Fund 50,000
City Operation Facility Fire Fire Administration Offices Remodel General Fund 600,000
Community Facility Civic Events Coliseum Acoustical Banners HOT,SASSRA 150,000
Community Facility Civic Events Coliseum Ice Plant HOT,Hockey Team 75,000
Community Facility Civic Events Bill Aylor Sr. Memorial River Stage Improvements HOT,CVB Contrib,Gen Fund 1,000,000
Community Facility Civic Events Coliseum Entryway Improvements HOT,SASSRA 100,000
Community Facility Civic Events Convention Center Exhibit Hall 1/2c Sales Tax 10,000,000
Community Facility Civic Events Convention Center Walkway HOT/1/2c sales tax/Hotel 100,000
Community Facility Civic Events Coliseum Sound System Amplifiers HOT/410/SASSRA Contribution 50,000
Community Facility Fire Prevention Fire Safety City Other‐Donations,Grants,Contrib 970,000
Community Facility Municipal Court Municipal Court Addition General Fund 182,400
Community Facility Operations Combined Maintenance Facility General Fund ‐ CO 750,000
Community Facility Parks Parking for Senior Centers General Fund 275,000
Community Park Parks Belaire Neighborhood Park General Fund 550,000
Community Park Parks Blackshear Neighborhood Park General Fund 350,000
Community Park Parks Bluffs Neighborhood Park General Fund 550,000
Community Park Parks College Hills East Neighborhood Park General Fund 300,000
Community Park Parks Exall Addition Pocket Park General Fund 99,000
Community Park Parks Kirby Community Park, Additional Improvements General Fund 600,000
Community Park Parks Northern Lakeview Neighborhood Park General Fund 450,000
Community Park Parks Paseo Irrigation General Fund 60,000
Community Park Parks Restroom Facilities, Neighborhood Parks General Fund 450,000
Community Park Parks Rio Concho Trail Extension to GFAB Housing General Fund 1,250,000
Community Park Parks South Concho Neighborhood Park Renovation 1/2¢ Sales Tax 325,000
Community Park Parks Southland East Neighborhood Park General Fund 660,000
Community Park Parks Lake Nasworthy Park Improvements Grants/Lake fund 5,000,000
Community Park Parks South Concho Park Trail General Fund/Grants 199,500
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: 24th St. at Blum St. General Fund 3,749,220
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: 30th Street at Day Elementary General Fund 345,600
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Beauregard Ave. – Campus to North Concho General Fund 2,986,335
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Bell Street at Koberlin St. General Fund 2,818,530
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Bradford St. at 24th St. General Fund 688,095
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Coke St. at East Angelo Draw General Fund 2,039,310
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: College Hills at North Fork of Red Arroyo General Fund 4,782,105
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: College Hills Blvd. at the South Fork of the General Fund 4,706,910
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Glenwood Dr. – Harrison to Greenwood General Fund 1,009,530
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Glenwood Dr. @ Howard General Fund 1,055,295
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Goodfellow Draw at Evelyn Ave. General Fund 1,317,600
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Howard St. at Brentwood Park General Fund 59,130
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Howard Street from North to Webster General Fund 397,305
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Lester Ln. at Tres Rios Dr. General Fund 140,535
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Lindenwood Dr. at Vista Del Arroyo General Fund 746,955
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Loop 306 Access Road at Eckerd’s General Fund 2,279,340
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Madison St – Avenue J to Algerita General Fund 232,065
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Monroe St. at Sulfur Draw Park General Fund 615,870
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Pecan St at 3rd St. General Fund 970,785
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Preusser St – Lowrie to Schroeder General Fund 785,700
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Regent Blvd. at Gordon Blvd. General Fund 2,879,145
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Southwest Blvd. at the South Fork of the General Fund 4,790,880
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Sul Ross St. at Sunset Dr. General Fund 1,662,390
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Taylor St, at Conchita St. General Fund 3,356,370
Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: 400 Block of E. 14th St General Fund 8,000,000
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Traffic Operations Portable Traffic Signal General Fund 100,000
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Edmund Blvd. from Van Buren to Howard St. General Fund 858,200
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Jefferson St. from Junius St. to Houston Harte General Fund 3,433,117
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of 19th St. from Concho River to Lillie St. General Fund 2,045,350
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of 28th St. from 29th St. to Armstrong St. General Fund 822,017
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of 37th St. from Bell St. to Pruitt Dr. General Fund 455,983
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of 41st St. from Coliseum Dr. to Bowie St. General Fund 2,483,017
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of 42nd St. from Coliseum Dr. to Armstrong St. General Fund 4,656,133
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Austin St. from Knickerbocker Rd. to Ave. N General Fund 1,577,800
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Avenue N from Bryant Blvd to Saint Marys General Fund 9,056,017
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Baze St. from Houston Harte to Culwell St. General Fund 307,683
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Beauregard Ave. from Taylor St. to Sherwood Way General Fund 942,875
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Bell St. from Railroad Tracks North to 37th St. General Fund 2,910,850
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Ben Ficklin Rd. from Becker Ln. to Country Club Rd. General Fund 1,889,250
96

386. City of San Angelo
2013‐2018 Capital Improvement Plan
Level 3 Future Projects
Total Project
Project Type Division Project Title Proposed Funding Costs
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Ben Ficklin Rd. from Bryant Blvd. to Bryant Blvd. General Fund 1,130,533
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Bowie St. from 24th St. to 47th St. General Fund 4,950,233
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of College Hills Blvd from Beauregard Ave to Sunset Blvd General Fund 11,740,467
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of College Hills Blvd. from Loop 306 to Valley View General Fund 4,754,583
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Cox Ln. from Sunset Blvd. to East Cox Ln. General Fund 854,183
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Culwell St. from Poe St. to Buchanan St. General Fund 1,835,900
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of East 14th St. from Chadbourne St. to Poe St. General Fund 5,021,417
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of East 19th St. from Bryat Blvd. to Lille St. General Fund 1,514,883
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of East 25th St. from Main St. to Poe St. General Fund 1,049,783
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Edmund Blvd. from Concho River to Bryant Blvd. General Fund 6,958,083
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Executive Dr. from Sunset Dr. to Knickerbocker Rd. General Fund 1,153,950
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Foster Rd. from Currier Ln. to Jackson St. General Fund 2,292,550
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Harris Ave. from Main St. to Bell St. General Fund 2,547,283
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Highland Ave. from Bryant Blvd. to Hill St. General Fund 665,467
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Howard St. from Pecos to Houston Harte Fwy. General Fund 876,000
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Hughes St. from Buchanan St. to Bell St. General Fund 1,583,483
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Huntington Ave. from Millbrook Dr. to Sunset Dr. General Fund 1,149,583
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Irving St. from Concho River to Washington St. General Fund 1,734,733
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Jackson St. from Avenue N to Knickerbocker Rd. General Fund 4,353,733
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Marx St. from 29th St. to 24th St. General Fund 1,437,750
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Mercedes St. from City Limit Line to Glenna Dr. General Fund 2,279,467
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Middle Concho Dr. from Red Bluff Ln. to the West General Fund 1,845,400
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Oakes St. from Harris Ave.to 14th St. General Fund 806,767
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Old Ballinger Hwy from North Bell St. to Pruitt Dr. General Fund 2,838,050
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Pecan St. from 7th St. to 14th St. General Fund 944,450
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Pecos St. from Concho River to Howard St. General Fund 3,003,117
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Red Bluff Rd. from Knickerbocker Rd. to Middle Concho General Fund 4,955,000
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Rio Concho Dr. from Magdalene St. to Roosevelt St. General Fund 2,329,550
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Riverside Golf Club Rd. from 29th St. to Bryant Blvd. General Fund 1,103,150
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Smith Blvd. from Pulliam St. to Houston Harte General Fund 1,748,900
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of South Concho Dr. from Sierra Vista to Knickerbocker Rd. General Fund 4,847,017
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Southland Blvd. from Knickerbocker Rd. to Blue Ridge Tr. General Fund 1,478,983
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Sunset Dr. from Knickerbocker Rd. south to railroad tracks General Fund 1,163,650
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Taylor St. from Beauregard Ave. to Live Oak St. General Fund 791,650
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Blumentritt Rd. from FM 1223 General Fund 240,000
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Rio Concho Drive Widening & Beautification General Fund 500,000
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Traffic Calming Proposal #1 Grant‐Fed Stimulus Funding 1,315,527
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Traffic Calming Proposal #2 General Fund 350,000
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Traffic Calming Proposal #3 General Fund 400,000
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Traffic Calming Proposal #4 General Fund 350,000
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Operations Spring Creek Park Road Improvements Other‐Nasworthy Trust Fund 215,000
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Operations Backup Power Supply for Signalized Intersections General Fund 531,000
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Traffic Operations Video Detection General Fund 557,000
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Traffic Operations School Zone Flashers General Fund 285,000
Infrastructure ‐ Streets Traffic Operations Signal Cabinets General Fund 78,000
Infrastructure ‐ Water Fort Concho Fort Concho Drainage Correction General Fund 225,000
Infrastructure ‐ Water Water Utilities Hickory Water Supply Development Phase II Water Fund,1/2¢ Sales Tax 25,400,000
Infrastructure ‐ Water Water Utilities Hickory Water Supply Development Phase III Water Fund,1/2¢ Sales Tax 14,300,000
Pedestrian Engineering Pedestrian Facilities Other‐TIRZ,1/2¢ Sales Tax 2,500,000
Pedestrian Operations Countdown Pedestrian Signal Indications General Fund 30,000
2013‐2018 Capital Improvement Plan Level 3 Future Projects Total 244,115,469
97

387. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ADOPTING THE
2013-2018 CAPITAL PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City Charter for the City of San Angelo, Texas, provides that
the City Manager shall prepare and submit to the City Council a multi-year capital
program before the final date for submission of the budget; and,
WHEREAS, on February 21, 2013 the City Manager presented a 2013-2018
capital program, which revises and extends the 2012-2017 capital program adopted by
the City Council on April 17, 2012; and,
WHEREAS, the contents of the 2013-2018 capital program comply with the
requirements Section 59A of the City Charter for the City of San Angelo;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 59A of the City Charter for the City of San
Angelo, the City Council by resolution shall adopt the capital program with or without
amendment after public hearing and on or before adoption of the annual budget.
WHEREAS, as of this date, the 2013 – 2014 annual budget has not yet been
adopted;
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 59A of the City Charter for the City of
San Angelo, after compliance with all publication and notice requirements, a public
hearing for City Council to consider adoption of the proposed 2013-2018 capital program
was held on March 19, 2013.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS THAT:
SECTION 1 The facts and matters set forth in the preamble of this Ordinance
are bound to be true and correct.
SECTION 2 It is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at
which this resolution was passed and adopted was open to the public as required and that
public notice of the time, place, and purpose of said meeting was given as required by the
Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Local Government Code.
SECTION 3 The 2013-2018 capital program is hereby adopted by majority vote
of the City Council without amendment, subject to deletion, modification or suspension
during the course of the fiscal year based on events, changes in technology or other
circumstances which justify such action.

388. PASSED and APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2013.
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS
ATTEST:
Alvin W. New, Mayor
Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORM
Daniel Valenzuela, City Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

389. 2013-2018
Capital Improvement Plan

390. 2013-2018 CIP Calendar
11/20/2012 Discuss CIP with City Council
12/10/2012 Budget Division sent out CIP forms
and instructions to divisions
12/20/2012 Projects submitted by divisions
1/31/2013 Committee reviewed draft CIP
2/7-12/2013 Public meetings
2/19/2013 Discuss CIP with City Council
2/26/2013 City Council Strategic Planning
Meeting
3/5/2013 Discuss CIP with City Council
3/19/2013 Adoption of the CIP

391. 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
At the strategic planning session, we defined capital
improvement projects with this approach:
• Level 1 – Infrastructure Priority
• Level 2 – Other projects within 5 years
• Level 3 – Other projects outside 5 years

392. 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan
# of Projects Amount of Project ($)
Level 1 –
33 $402,808,769
Infrastructure
Level 2 –
48 84,679,315
All Others
Level 3 –
116 244,115,469
Outside 5 years
Total 197 $731,603,553

393. 2013-2018 CIP Calendar
11/20/2012 Discuss CIP with City Council
12/10/2012 Budget Division sent out CIP forms
and instructions to divisions
12/20/2012 Projects submitted by divisions
1/31/2013 Committee reviewed draft CIP
2/7-12/2013 Public meetings
2/19/2013 Discuss CIP with City Council
2/26/2013 City Council Strategic Planning
Meeting
3/5/2013 Discuss CIP with City Council
3/19/2013 Adoption of the CIP

394. City of San Angelo
Engineering Services
Memo
Date: March 6, 2013
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Clinton Bailey, City Engineer
Subject: Agenda Item for March 19, 2013 Council Meeting
Contact: Clinton Bailey, Development Services, 657-4203
Caption: Discussion of prohibiting commercial vehicles from using certain streets and
parking in certain areas within the San Angelo city limits and any action in
connection thereto
Summary: The City of San Angelo Code of Ordinances contains articles which enable the
City to prohibit commercial vehicles from using certain streets and from parking in
certain areas within the San Angelo city limits.
From observation, it appears that the increase in commercial vehicle traffic within
the City is primarily due to the following:
1. Construction equipment and construction materials delivery vehicles
(dump trucks, tractor trailers, concrete trucks etc.) associated with the
recent and significant increase commercial and residential land
development; and,
2. Commercial property servicing businesses whose primary function is the
delivery of materials and equipment to offsite locations using tractor
trailers and other large commercial vehicles.
History: This item was requested by Councilman Dwain Morrison.
Financial Impact: n/a
Related Vision Item Neighborhood Vision and Transportation Vision
(if applicable):
Other Information/ There are four sections in San Angelo's Code of Ordinances which address the
Recommendation: usage and access of and by commercial vehicles. These are summarized below
and excerpts provided as attachments.
Article 10.100 of the City's Code of Ordinances defines commercial vehicles, as
well as laying out the requirements for where commercial vehicles may and may
not be used. Section 10.107(g)(3) lists street segments along which, when signs
are erected giving notice, commercial vehicles cannot be operated except to
deliver or pick up merchandise. 10.107(g)(4) requires these vehicles to
immediately exit the street once they have picked up or delivered as intended.
Article 10.1200 of the City's Code of Ordinances addresses routes which are
required as the sole routes for the transportation of hazardous materials. It also
defines hazardous materials, and provides exceptions - such as repair, retail

395. delivery, and transfer. Lastly, it addresses the parking or storing of vehicles
containing hazardous materials, signage, and responsibilities of the drivers
operating such vehicles.
Article 10.1000 of the City's Code of Ordinances prohibits the parking of
commercial vehicles on a street or lot in a residential district, or on a street
bordering a residential district. It then lists exceptions in Section 10.1005, under
which such parking may occur temporarily or when meeting setbacks and located
on private property.
Lastly, Section 412 of the Zoning Ordinance addresses commercial vehicle
peripherally, only by limiting the number of delivery and pickup of materials by
commercial vehicles to home occupations.
Staff recommends that the City Council provide Staff with specific direction
regarding any desired or proposed modifications to existing City ordinances
related to this issue.
Attachments: Excerpts from City of San Angelo Code of Ordinances
Presentation: Clinton Bailey, City Engineer
Publication: n/a
Reviewed by AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services (03/07/13)
Director:
Approved by Legal: n/a

396. ARTICLE 10.100 TRAFFIC REGULATIONS GENERALLY
Sec. 10.107 Miscellaneous Driving Rules
(g) Commercial Vehicle Prohibited from Using Certain Streets:
(1) A commercial vehicle for the purpose of this article is defined as every
vehicle designed, maintained, or used primarily for the transportation of
property and whose gross weight exceeds three and one-half (3-1/2) tons. This
article never shall be construed to include vehicles commonly known as
pickup trucks.
(2) This section shall not apply to persons operating police, fire, emergency,
maintenance, or other similar vehicles at the direction of the city, County of
Tom Green or State of Texas.
(3) When signs are erected giving notice thereof, no person shall operate a
commercial vehicle, except as provided under the following paragraph, on any
of the following streets or parts of streets.
(A) Texas Avenue between Foster Street and Bryant Boulevard.
(B) Avenue X between Foster Street and Bryant Boulevard.
(C) Avenue Y between Foster Street and Bryant Boulevard.
(D) Avenue Z between Foster Street and Bryant Boulevard.
(E) San Jacinto between Foster Street and Bryant Boulevard.
(F) Iris between Christoval Road and Ft. McKavitt Road.
(G) River Oakes between Christoval Road and Ft. McKavitt Road.
(H) Penrose between Christoval Road and Ft. McKavitt Road.
(I) Windham between Christoval Road and Ft. McKavitt Road.
(J) Greer Street between Fort McKavitt Road and Christoval Road.
(K) Churchill Boulevard between Margie Street and Christoval Road.
(L) Meadow Drive between Mimosa Drive and FM 2105.
(M) On 30th Street between the east gate to the Hirschfeld Steel
facilities and Irving Street.

397. (N) Field Street between Junius Street and Howard Street.
(O) 48th Street between Lake Drive and Chadbourne Street.
(P) Murphy Street between LaCruz Street and Currier Street.
(Q) Amistad Road beginning at Robin Hood Trail and extending one
thousand and four hundred seventy feet (1,470') north.
(R) Avenue K between the east entrance to the Water Department
Plant and South Concho Park Drive.
(S) Marie Street between Beacon Street and LaFollette Street.
(T) On Beacon Street between a point two hundred fifty-five feet
(255') east of Bell Street and Marie Street.
(U) Spaulding Street between Baze Street and Bell Street.
(V) Koberlin Street between Main Street and Bell Street.
(W) Preusser Street between Main Street and Bell Street.
(X) Harris Avenue between Main Street and Bell Street.
(Y) Dellwood Drive between Christoval Road and Edgewood Drive.
(Z) Edgewood Drive between South Chadbourne (F. M. 1223) and
Dellwood Drive.
(AA) Avenue Q between Bryant Boulevard and Chadbourne Street.
(BB) Currier Street, between Texas Avenue and Avenue V.
(CC) Avenue H between Hill Street and Irving Street.
(DD) Avenue I between Hill Street and Irving Street.
(EE) Avenue J between Hill Street and Irving Street.
(FF) Avenue K between Hill Street and Irving Street.
(GG) Fort McKavitt Road between Paint Rock Road and River Oakes
Street.
(HH) Hobbs Street between Christoval Road and Lipan Drive.

398. (II) Logan Street between Christoval Road and Sellers Drive.
(JJ) Sellers Street between Paint Rock Road and Logan Street.
(KK) Cox Lane between Ben Ficklin Road and Foster Road.
(LL) Avenue G between Irving and Hill Streets.
(MM) Pecos Street between the northern section of David Street and
Howard Street.
(NN) Old Christoval Road from Paint Rock Road to Chadbourne Street.
(4) Commercial vehicles may be operated on the above-named streets and
parts of streets only for the purpose of delivering or picking up materials or
merchandise and then only by entering such street at the intersection nearest
the destination of the vehicle and proceeding thereon no farther than the
nearest intersection thereafter.
ARTICLE 10.1200 ROUTES FOR VEHICLES TRANSPORTING HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS
Sec. 10.1201 Vehicle Routes
(a) No person shall operate or permit the driving or operation of any truck or transporting
vehicle under their control carrying hazardous material over any street, alley, or other
public way within the corporate limits of the city, except upon the following portions of
the following streets, which are hereby designated as "truck routes."
(1) US Highway 67: from the west San Angelo city limits to Loop 306
(2) Loop 306: from US Highway 67 to US Highway 87
(3) US Highway 87: from Loop 306 south to the San Angelo city limits
(b) Such designated truck routes are shown on the map on file in the city clerk's office,
marked Exhibit "A" and which is made a part hereof for all legal purposes as is set out in
full herein, showing in heavy continuous lines the route or routes over which such
transport vehicles may be driven or operated while within the corporate limits of the city.
Said map is to be executed and attested by the mayor and city clerk and remain in the
office of the city clerk as the official Truck Route Map for the city. An exact duplicate of
said official Truck Route Map shall be prepared and kept in the office of the Assistant
city manager and also signed by the mayor and attested to by the city clerk under date of
this section as an exact duplicate original of the map maintained on file in the office of
the city clerk.

399. (c) This article shall apply to every motor vehicle used for transporting hazardous
materials. This article shall not apply to emergency vehicles or trucks in the service or
maintenance departments of the city.
(d) Trucks or transporting vehicles carrying hazardous materials restricted to the streets
designated as "truck routes" herein, may depart from such routes where it is necessary to
load or unload merchandise at locations situated off of designated routes; provided,
however, such vehicles shall follow the most direct truck route to the point nearest their
ultimate destination and provided further that such vehicles shall not leave designated
truck routes until they have reached a turning off point that can be described as the
shortest distance practical to the ultimate destination of the vehicle which is consistent
with a reasonable operation of the vehicle; provided, further, said vehicles may depart
from the designated truck routes for the purpose of traveling to and from a duly
designated truck terminal, provided that such vehicle proceeds by the most direct route
that is practicable.
(1959 Code of Ordinances, Sec. 10-21-1)
Sec. 10.1202 Definitions
(a) Hazardous Material. Materials which can cause death or disabling injury on brief
exposure, highly flammable or volatile liquids, gasses or solids, detonable materials, or
highly self reactive materials, including, but not limited to:
(1) Explosives and explosively unstable materials.
(2) High level or moderately radioactive materials.
(3) Highly flammable gasses and materials which give off extremely
flammable vapors, and other flammable liquids and solids.
(4) All compressed gasses, whether or not flammable or combustible.
(5) Gasoline and other liquid fuels.
(6) Extremely toxic materials which are so poisonous that no bodily
exposure should occur, such as parathion and hydrogen cyanide, as well as
highly toxic materials which are likely to cause some injury or illness but not
death from a moderate exposure.
(7) Materials which are extremely corrosive to living tissue, such as
bromine, which can injure almost instantaneously, or hydrofluoric acid which
can strike through the skin to the tissues beneath and cause deep, slow-healing
burns. Also included are materials that could cause severe eye injury, or
destruction of tissue, particularly the eyes, if not removed from the body in a
very short time.

400. (b) Transporting Vehicles. As the term is used in the article shall mean all vehicles
and appurtenances thereto used for the transportation of hazardous materials in
commercial quantities, except that those vehicles which are equipped for the use of
liquefied petroleum gas as a fuel system for the vehicle itself shall not be subject to the
provisions of this article insofar as liquefied petroleum gas is carried on such vehicle for
fuel for such vehicle.
(c) Designated Truck Terminal. An area for trans-shipment of merchandise and
service and maintenance of trucks.
(d) Commercial Quantity. Any quantity of material transported by a vehicle not
intended for the vehicle's consumption and/or such quantity is intended for resale or is
being transported for hire.
(1959 Code of Ordinances, Sec. 10-21-2)
Sec. 10.1203 Miscellaneous Provisions
(a) Any retail delivery of hazardous materials to local bulk facilities or users of such
products located off the designated routes as shown on the map located at the end of this
section will be permitted and authorized provided that the transporting vehicle uses the
designated routes to the point nearest the location of such using customer and the
transporting vehicle shall be driven from the specified route along the most practical and
direct route to the location of the customer and the return of such transporting vehicle
shall be along the most direct and practical route back to the designated routes as
established in this article.
(b) No transporting vehicle containing hazardous materials shall be parked or stored
on the streets, alleys, public thoroughfares, or at any other point within the corporate
limits of the city except upon premises owned or leased by the owner of such transporting
vehicle and approved as a permanent commercial material location as provided by the
Fire Prevention Code of the city; provided, however, that such vehicle may be parked at
the point where the commodity is to be delivered and such delivery shall be made without
delay. In no event shall such transporting vehicle be parked for the purpose of unloading
or delivery of the hazardous materials for a longer period of time than one hour, unless
the express permission of the chief of the Fire Department is first obtained.
(c) No hazardous materials shall be transferred from one transporting vehicle to
another transporting vehicle on any street, alley, public thoroughfare, or at any other
point in the city other than on the premises on which permanent storage facilities are
located; except, that in case of any emergency, such transfer may be made under the
supervision of the chief of the Fire Department.
(d) Any such vehicles may be driven off the designated routes to a public garage or
repair shop when reasonably necessary for the maintenance and repair of such vehicle;

401. provided, however, that this provision shall never be construed as authorizing the repair
of vehicles in areas otherwise prohibited by the provisions of this code, or by state law.
(e) Any person operating any of the aforesaid vehicles upon any street or roadway
which is not designated a truck route as provided for hereinabove shall have in his
possession for the inspection of police officer his log book or evidence of his destination
and point of origin to justify the presence of said vehicle on a street or roadway other
than a designated truck route.
(f) The City of San Angelo will request and the Highway Department District
Engineer shall erect appropriate signs and markings advising operators of the above
named vehicles of the truck routes established herein. Whenever any street or roadway
designated as a truck route is under repair or otherwise temporarily out of use, the city
manager and Highway Department District Engineer shall be authorized to designate
alternate truck routes.
(1959 Code of Ordinances, Sec. 10-21-3)

403. ARTICLE 10.1000 PARKING RESTRICTED IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS*
Sec. 10.1001 Definitions
Commercial Vehicle. Every vehicle, including motor vehicles and trailers, designed,
maintained or used primarily for the nonrecreational transportation of property and/or
people and the gross weight. of which exceeds three and one-half (3-1/2) tons. This
definition shall never be construed to include motor vehicles commonly known as
"pickup trucks".
Trailer. Every vehicle, designed or used to carry its load wholly on its own structure and
for being drawn by a motor vehicle.
Semi-Trailer. Every vehicle designed for carrying persons or property and for being
drawn by a motor vehicle and so constructed that some or part of its weight or load rests
upon or is carried by another vehicle.
Pole Trailer. Every vehicle, not a trailer or semi-trailer (as defined above) designed to be
drawn by another vehicle and attached to the towing vehicle by means of a reach or pole,
or by being boomed or otherwise secured to the towing vehicle and ordinarily used for
transporting long or irregularly shaped loads such as poles, pipe or structural members
capable generally of sustaining themselves as beams between the supporting connections.
Truck Tractor. Every motor vehicle designed and used primarily for drawing other
vehicles and not so constructed as to carry a load other than part of the weight of the
vehicle and load so drawn.
Residential District.
(1) Any lot or tract of land zoned to permit or actually used for residential
purposes;
(2) Any area within the city zoned for use as or actually used for residential
purposes.
Recreational Vehicle. Every motor vehicle, trailer or semi-trailer primarily designed and
used as a temporary living quarters for recreational, camping or travel use; including
motor homes, truck camper, travel trailer and camping trailer.
(1959 Code of Ordinances, Sec. 10-19-1)
Sec. 10.1002 Parking Prohibited
It shall be unlawful for any person to park a commercial vehicle, trailer, semi-trailer, pole
trailer, truck tractor or recreational vehicle on a street or lot in a residential district or on a
street bordering a residential district. (1959 Code of Ordinances, Sec. 10-19-2)

404. Sec. 10.1003 Penalty
Any person violating the provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and
upon conviction thereof shall he fined in accordance with the general penalty provision
found in Section 1.106 of this code. (1959 Code of Ordinances, Sec. 10-19-3)
Sec. 10.1004 Presumption
The presence of any of the vehicles aforementioned in a prohibited area shall be prima
facie evidence that such vehicle is illegally parked and that same is illegally parked by
the owner of such vehicle or with the permission and consent of such owner. (1959 Code
of Ordinances, Sec. 10-19-4)
Sec. 10.1005 Exceptions
The prohibitions of this article shall not apply to:
(1) Trucks and trailers designed and used for transporting furniture and
household goods while in the process of loading or unloading said items;
(2) Other trailers or commercial vehicles while in the process of loading or
unloading;
(3) Mobile homes (as defined elsewhere within this code) provided that
their right to occupy the location appears affirmatively from other statutes or
ordinances;
(4) Trailers and semi-trailers used for recreational or home owner utility
purposes and recreational vehicles (units hereinbelow) parked as follows:
(A) Inside parking, or
(B) Outside parking in a side yard not adjacent to and parallel to a
street so long as the unit is set back from the property line at least five
feet (5'), or
(C) Outside parking in the rear yard so long as the unit meets the
setback requirements of an accessory building, as established elsewhere
within this code, or
(1959 Code of Ordinances, Sec. 10-19-5)
(D) Outside parking in the front yard or a side yard adjacent to and
parallel to a street so long as:

405. (i) Space is not available or there is no reasonable access to
either the side yard not adjacent to and parallel to a street or rear
yard; a corner lot is always deemed to have reasonable access to
the rear yard;
(ii) Inside parking is not possible;
(iii) The unit is parked perpendicular to the street curb or street
edge, or parallel on an improved surface semi-circular drive;
(iv) No part of the unit extends over a public sidewalk; and
(v) Providing the body of the unit (exclusive of tongue) is at
least ten feet (10') from the face of the curb or, should there be no
curb, ten feet (10') from the end of the street pavement.
(E) Parking is permitted in a residential district, as provided above,
only if the unit is:
(i) Not used for permanent dwelling purposes (unless said right
appears affirmatively from other statutes or ordinances) but may be
used temporarily as guest quarters for a period not to exceed more
than fourteen (14) days in any six (6) month period; and
(ii) Not connected to water lines or sewer lines (unless said right
appears affirmatively from other statutes or ordinances) for a
period of time exceeding fourteen (14) days in any six (6) month
period.
(Ordinance adopted 8/3/04)
(F) Notwithstanding the above, a unit may be parked anywhere on the
premises during active loading or unloading and the temporary use of
electricity or water line hookup is permissible when necessary to prepare
a recreational vehicle for use
(G) Any vehicle parked for a period of less than two (2) hours while
the person parking same is consuming a meal.
(1959 Code of Ordinances, Sec. 10-19-5)

406. ZONING ORDINANCE: CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” ARTICLE 1 GENERAL
PROVISIONS
Sec. 412. Home Occupations
In order to provide peace, quiet and domestic tranquillity within all residential
neighborhoods within the City and in order to help all residents gain freedom from
excessive noise, excessive traffic, nuisance, fire hazards and other possible side effects of
commercial uses being conducted in residential areas, the following standards shall apply
to all home occupations.
A. Criteria
1. No person, other than members of the family who reside in the dwelling
where a home occupation occurs, may engage in such occupation, profession,
domestic craft, instructional or economic enterprise.
2. The area utilized for the home occupation shall not exceed 25% of the
gross floor area of the principal building where the home occupation occurs.
3. In no way shall the appearance of the structure be altered or the
occupation be conducted in a manner which would cause the premises to
differ from its residential character either by the use of colors, materials,
construction, lighting or the emissions of sounds, noise or vibrations. A home
occupation shall produce no offensive noise, dust, odors or heat. A home
occupation shall be completely contained within the principal building. Any
noise, vibration, smoke, electrical interference, dust, odors, heat or visual or
audio interference detectable beyond the property lines or beyond the walls of
the dwelling unit, if the unit is part of a multi-family structure, shall constitute
a violation of the terms of this Section.
4. No detached accessory building may be used in conjunction with a home
occupation.
5. All material, equipment, and/or supplies used in conjunction with a home
occupation shall be completely enclosed with no exterior storage, temporary
or permanent, allowed.
6. No stock, goods, wares or merchandise shall be sold on the premises
other than that which is prepared or produced upon the premises. Direct sales
on the premises of other merchandise is allowed by prior individualized
invitation.
7. Signage for home occupations shall be limited to one non-illuminated
sign with a maximum area of two square feet.

407. 8. Delivery and pickup of materials to and from the home occupation shall
not exceed two trips per week by a commercial vehicle. A "commercial
vehicle" is that which is defined in Section 10.1001 of the City's Code of
Ordinances.

408. City of San Angelo
Memo
Meeting Date: March 19, 2013
To: City Council members
From: Kevin Boyd, Planner
Subject: Mobile Home Permit 40, a request for temporary placement of a
mobile home, not to exceed 1 year, during construction of a
permanent home on the same 3 acre site in a Ranch & Estate
(R&E) zoning district, on the following property:
Location: 1105 West 48th Street, located approximately 320 feet east of
the intersection of Lake Drive and West 48 Street; more
specifically occupying the Chandler Subdivision, Section 1,
Block 1, Lot 2, in northwest San Angelo.
Purpose: To allow a recreational vehicle to be placed on the subject
property, during the construction of a home on the same site.
Contacts: Kenneth A. Rocksuold, Owner (520) 241-9550
Kevin Boyd, Planner (325) 657-4210
Caption: Consideration of request for temporary placement of a mobile
home, not to exceed one year, during construction of a
permanent home on the same 3 acre site. 1105 West 48th
Street, located approximately 320 feet east of the intersection of
Lake Drive and West 48 Street; more specifically occupying the
Chandler Subdivision, Section 1, Block 1, Lot 2, in northwest
San Angelo.
Summary: The City Council may:
(1) Approve a Mobile Home Permit allowing a mobile home on the subject
property, as requested: or

409. (2) Approve a Mobile Home Permit allowing a mobile home on the subject
property, subject to conditions believed necessary and appropriate to
mitigate any adverse effects of such use; or
(3) Deny the requested Mobile Home Permit allowing a mobile home all
together.
Recommendation: City staff recommends approving the temporary
placement of a mobile home on the subject to one condition.
History and Background:
General Information
Existing Zoning: Ranch & Estate (R&E)
Existing Land Use: Vacant, open space
Surrounding Zoning/Land Use:
North: Ranch & Estate (R&E) Residential dwellings
West: Ranch & Estate (R&E) Open space and vacant
and Light Manufacturing commercial building
(ML)
South: Ranch & Estate (R&E) Storage yard
East: Ranch & Estate (R&E) Residential dwellings
Thoroughfares/Streets: West 48th Street is classified as a ‘local
street’ designed to carry light
neighborhood traffic at low speeds.
Zoning History: As far back as 1949, this area has been
annexed into the city.
In 1949, the property was zoned Ranch &
Estate (R&E), which is an equivalent to the
current zoning.
Applicable Regulations: Article 12.500 Section 15.504, “Temporary
Mobile Home Installation.” A mobile home
may be placed temporarily on a site during
the construction of a home.
Development Standards: Section 303.A, “R&E (Ranch & Estate)
District.” The intent of R&E is to provide
opportunities for development of low

410. density, detached single-family residences
on lots of at least one acre in a suburban
or rural setting.
Vision Plan Map: Commercial
Related Comp Plan
Excerpt(s): The intent of neighborhood is to reflect the
quality of life of its community by defining
each neighborhood individually within the
city. The subject property is defined as
“Ranch & Estate.”
Special Information
Traffic Concerns: The amount of traffic generated from the
proposed use will be minimum. West 48
Street is able to accommodate the
increased traffic generated by the site.
Parking Requirements: 2 spaces, which include paved access to
the street.
Parking Provided: No parking currently exists on the site.
Related Specific Use
Standards: Section 12.501, Zoning Ordinance
As used in this article, the term "mobile
home" shall be interpreted to mean include
"manufactured homes", or this case,
recreational vehicles (RVs).
Section 12.502, Zoning Ordinance
All mobile homes (including manufactured
homes), whether located in mobile home
parks or subdivisions, or on private lots,
which have been in place for a period
greater than one hundred twenty (120)
days, shall be tied down and anchored in
accordance with state standards.
Section 12.503 Skirting, Zoning Ordinance
All mobile homes, whether located in
mobile home parks or subdivisions, or
private lots, which have been in place for a
period greater than one hundred twenty
(120) days, shall be skirted in accordance
with the official code of the city.

411. Notification Required?: Yes
Notifications Sent: 10
Responses in Favor: 0
Responses in Opposition: 0
Analysis:
The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below.
On February 2013, the proponent made a request to temporarily place a recreational
vehicle on the subject property, while his house is under construction. In normal
circumstances within the city, placement of mobile homes – on a permanent basis –
is limited to Manufactured Housing Parks (MHP) or Manufactured Housing
Subdivisions (MHS) districts and various locations in the city where it is allowed only
by use of a special permit. This temporary request is an alternative that is intended to
provide temporary living quarters for the property owner, while construction of the
primary structure is underway. It is important to note that once the year duration has
elapsed, the use must no longer be a place of residence (Article 12.500, City
Ordinances).
The temporary permit procedure to allow for placement of a mobile home, in order to
construct an allowed residence, is typically prohibited in Ranch & Estate zoning or
any residential district. The permit does not allow for a long-term variance, in fact, a
period of one year is expressly outlined in the Ordinance. In sum, approval of this
request offers a temporary reprieve – with the possibility of a one year extension.
The property in question is currently a vacant empty lot zoned Ranch and Estate
(R&E). While the Vision Plan calls for Commercial in the area, much of the
surrounding area is characteristic of low density residential development. A lot
roughly 250 feet to the west is occupied by a vacant commercial building. Tracts in
the area are quite sizeable; many of the lots are greater than 2 acres. Staff is
recommending approval of this request given the rural nature of the area, and the
fact that the proposed use is low intensive and will not disturb the natural
environment of the area. Staff affirms that R&E zoning districts are required to
comply with applicable standards, and that allowing this temporary permit is
consistent with the spirit of the Zoning Ordinance given the long term, permanent
plans for the property.
Although this request would provide a temporary living solution, a possible extension
granted by City Council could allow the structure to exist on the lot for an additional
year. Any period longer than this, staff believes, would be a contradiction to the spirit
and intent of R&E zoning. Furthermore, it would provide an exception not available to
others thus creating an inequitable situation, which is not what the Zoning Ordinance

412. seeks to encourage here. Given the location and intent of this request, staff
recommends approval since the location is appropriate, is consistent with spirit of the
Zoning Ordinance, and provides equality in the administering of regulations.
Proposed Conditions
1) The mobile home shall cease to be a dwelling unit on the property by
February 1, 2014 as requested by the applicant, unless an extension is
approved by the City Council.
Attachments: Excerpt from zoning map, showing the general
location within the City of San Angelo;
Excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject
property; and
Aerial photo, highlighting subject property;
Excerpt of the favor/opposition notification map; and
Applicant’s handwritten request for a temporary
permit.
Presentation: AJ Fawver, AICP, Interim Director of Development
Services
Reviewed by: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner

418. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS,
CHAPTER 5 “BUSINESS AND COMMERCE”, ARTICLE
5.800 “HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX”, SECTION 5.805
“PURPOSE AND DISTRIBUTION OF TAX”, BY
REPEALING SAID SECTION IN ITS ENTIRETY AND
ADOPTING A NEW SECTION 5.805 ENTITLED, “USE OF
REVENUE”, TO REMOVE THE MANDATED
ALLOCATION OF REVENUE FOR USES ON A FIXED
PERCENTAGE BASIS AND TO PROVIDE FOR
ALLOCATION OF REVENUE FOR USES PERMITTED BY
LAW AS CITY COUNCIL MAY DETERMINE WILL
PROVIDE THE BEST VALUE IN APPLICATION OF
HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX REVENUE TO THE CITIZENS
OF SAN ANGELO BY RESOLUTION FROM TIME TO
TIME.
WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo levies and collects a hotel occupancy tax , the
revenue of which is allocated on a fixed percentage basis for uses as mandated by the City of
San Angelo Code of Ordinances, Chapter 5 “Business and Commerce”, Article 5.800 “Hotel
Occupancy Tax”, Section 5.805 “Purpose and Distribution of Tax”; and,
WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo is experiencing a changing economy and related
positive hotel occupancy tax revenue collections and,
WHEREAS, amending the Hotel Occupancy Tax Ordinance by removing the mandated
allocations of revenue for uses on a fixed percentage basis, and providing that the City Council
allocate revenue for uses pursuant to law as the City Council may determined from time to time,
will provide the best value in application of hotel occupancy tax revenue to the citizens of City
of San Angelo;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:
Section 1.) THAT, Chapter 5, “Business and Commerce”, Article 5.800 “Hotel Occupancy
Tax” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of San Angelo, Section 5.805
“Purpose and Distribution of Tax”, is hereby repealed in its entirety and a new
Section 5.805 entitled “Use of Revenue” is hereby adopted to read as follows:
“Sec. 5.805 Use of Revenue
(a) The revenue derived from this Hotel Occupancy Tax shall only be used to promote
tourism and the convention and hotel industry as limited by the Texas Tax Code,
Chapter 351 “Municipal Hotel Occupancy Taxes” as now enacted or hereafter
amended, in accordance with resolution of the city council..
(b) The city council by contract may delegate to a person, including another
governmental entity or a private organization, the management or supervision of

419. programs and activities funded with revenue from the tax authorized by this article.
The city council shall approve in writing in advance the annual budget of the person,
governmental entity or private organization to which it delegates those functions and
shall require the person, governmental entity or private organization to make periodic
reports to the City Council at least quarterly listing the expenditures made by the
person, governmental body or private organization with revenue from the tax
provided by the city as authorized by law. The person, governmental entity or private
organization must maintain revenue provided by the city from the tax in a separate
account established for that purpose and may not commingle that revenue with any
other money or maintain it in any other account. The approval by the city council of
the annual budget of that person, governmental entity or private organization to
whom it delegates those functions creates a fiduciary duty in that person,
governmental entity or private organization with respect to the revenue provided by
the city from the tax”.
(e) This article shall become effective on the date of its adoption, and shall apply to
taxes due and received from and after , 2013
Section 2.) THAT, the terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be
severable in that if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid,
the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance
Section 3.) THAT, this Ordinance shall be effective on the date of its adoption.
INTRODUCED on the day of , 2013, and finally PASSED,
APPROVED and ADOPTED on this the day of , 2013.
CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS
ATTEST: BY:
Alvin New, Mayor
By: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
Approved as to Content: Approved as to Form:
Michael Dane Lysia H. Bowling
Assistant City Manager / CFO City Attorney

420. City of San Angelo
Memo
Date: March 7, 2013
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Michael Dane, Assistant City Manager/CFO
Subject: Agenda Item for March 19, 2013, Council Meeting
Contact: Morgan Trainer, 653-6291
Caption: Regular Agenda
First Public Hearing and consideration of introducing an Ordinance amending the
allocation method of Hotel Occupancy Tax and related matters
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, CHAPTER 5 “BUSINESS AND COMMERCE”, ARTICLE
5.800 “HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX”, SECTION 5.805 “PURPOSE AND
DISTRIBUTION OF TAX”, BY REPEALING SAID SECTION IN ITS ENTIRETY
AND ADOPTING A NEW SECTION 5.805 ENTITLED, “USE OF REVENUE”, TO
REMOVE THE MANDATED ALLOCATION OF REVENUE FOR USES ON A
FIXED PERCENTAGE BASIS AND TO PROVIDE FOR ALLOCATION OF
REVENUE FOR USES PERMITTED BY LAW AS CITY COUNCIL MAY
DETERMINE WILL PROVIDE THE BEST VALUE IN APPLICATION OF HOTEL
OCCUPANCY TAX REVENUE TO THE CITIZENS OF SAN ANGELO BY
RESOLUTION FROM TIME TO TIME;
Summary: City staff is requesting the City Council consider adopting an Ordinance adopting
changes to the use of hotel occupancy tax dollars. Due to San Angelo’s changing
economy and positive hotel occupancy tax experience, it is prudent to change
existing methodology to provide the best value to the citizens of San Angelo.
Changes to the ordinance remove the requirement to allocate HOT funds on a
percentage basis and allow the City Council allocate through an annual approval
process.
Staff will remind the Council of these percentages at the time allocations are
decided and ensure Council allocates funding in accordance with State Law.
History: The City of San Angelo levied the hotel occupancy tax for the operation of
convention facilities, the promotion of tourism, and the improvement of the arts.
Current contracts and ordinances allocate 48% of tax receipts to City of San
Angelo Civic Events, 47% to the Convention & Visitors Bureau, and the remaining
5% to the San Angelo Cultural Affairs Council. The current tax rate is 7% for the
City of San Angelo. The state levies an additional 6%. No change is proposed to
the tax levy.
On February 5, 2013 City Council discussed changing the Hotel Occupancy Tax
allocation process. On March 5, 2013 staff presented a draft contract with the
Chamber of Commerce Convention & Visitors Bureau to revise the way Hotel
Occupancy Tax dollars are disbursed to include clear communication, performance

421. benchmarks, demonstrate the value added, and allow the City Council to shape the
entity’s activity.
Financial Impact: Due to recent positive economic experience, Hotel Occupancy Tax receipts
have increased. The proposed ordinance will allow City Council greater flexibility
and will place greater accountability on recipients. As a result, any excess funds or
surplus receipts will be made available for one-time or capital projects as allowed
by Chapter 351 of the State Tax Code.
Related Vision Item (if applicable): Financial Vision
Other Information/Recommendation: Staff recommends introduction of the ordinance.
Attachments: Article 5.800 of the Code of Ordinances
Presentation: N/A
Publication: N/A
Reviewed by Director: Michael Dane, Assistant City Manager/CFO March 8, 2013
Approved by Legal: Pending

423. City of San Angelo
Finance Department
Memo
Date: March 12, 2013
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk
Subject: Agenda Item for March 19, 2013 Council Meeting
Contact: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk, 657-4405
Tracy Ogle, COG, 944-9666
Caption: Consideration of nominating City Council members to serve as a representatives on the
Concho Valley Council of Government General Assembly
Summary/History: The COG Bylaws provide voting membership eligibility for the City. The City should
designate one member to the Executive Committee and two additional representatives to the General
Assembly of the COG. The three representatives must be members of the Council and nominated by the
Council. Due to the resignation of former Councilmember Adams, a City Council member should be
nominated to fill the vacancy.
According to the COG Bylaws, Representation, each member city which is incorporated and has a population
exceeding 50,000 shall have three (3) representatives who are qualified and elected as prescribed in Article
III, A. To date, two City Council members are appointed.
Current appointees are as follows:
Executive Committee - Meetings: Second Wednesday, 7:00 PM, CVCOG facility
Mayor Alvin New (appointed 1/19/10)
General Assembly - Meetings: Annually in December
Fredd Adams (appointed 6/1/10)
Charlotte Farmer (appointed 6/23/09)
Financial Impact: None
Related Vision Item (if applicable): N/A
Other Information/Recommendation: Staff recommends Council nominate a member or members to
the COG board.
Attachments: Letter from COG, Bylaws, and Member Listing
Presentation: N/A
Publication: N/A

425. CONCHO VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
GENERAL ASSEMBLY REPRESENTATIVES
SEPTEMBER 2012
COUNTIES
Member Government Representative(s) Status
1. Coke County Judge * Roy Blair (1)
2. Concho County Judge * Allen Amos (1)
3. Crockett County Judge *Fred Deaton (1)
4. Irion County Commissioner *John Nanny (1)
5. Kimble County Judge * Andrew Murr (1)
6. Mason County Judge * Jerry Bearden (1)
7. McCulloch County Judge * Danny Neal (1)
8. Menard County Judge * Richard Cordes (1)
9. Reagan County Judge * Larry Isom (1)
10. Schleicher County Judge * Charlie Bradley (1)
11. Sterling County Judge * Ralph Sides (1)
12. Sutton County Commissioner * Miguel Villanueva (1)
13. Tom Green County #1 Judge * Michael Brown (1)
14. Tom Green County #2 Commissioner Ralph Hoelscher (1)
15. Tom Green County #3 Commissioner Aubrey deCordova (1)
CITIES
16. Big Lake Council Member Cliff Miller (1)
17. Brady Council Member Brendan Weatherman (1)
18. Bronte Mayor Gerald Sandusky (1)
19. Eden Council Member Butch Williams (1)
20. Eldorado Mayor John Nikolauk (1)
21. Junction Mayor Larry Maddux (1)
22. Mason VACANT
23. Melvin VACANT
24. Menard Mayor Barbara Hooten (1)
25. Mertzon Mayor Art Uber (1)
26. Paint Rock Mayor Duane Schniers (1)
27. Robert Lee Mayor John R. Jacobs (1)
28. San Angelo #1 Councilmember Fredd B. Adams (1)
29. San Angelo #2 Councilmember Charlotte Farmer (1)
30. San Angelo #3 VACANT
31. Sonora Mayor Smith Neal (1)
32. Sterling City VACANT- notification sent
OTHER MEMBERS
33. San Angelo I.S.D. #1 * Lanny Layman (1)
34. San Angelo I.S.D. #2 Tim Archer (1)
35. State Legislator #1 * Drew Darby (2)
36. State Legislator #2 * Harvey Hilderbran (2)
(1) Written designation on file
(2) Appointed by Executive Committee
* Also designated as Executive Committee Member

426. BYLAWS
Of the
CONCHO VALLEY
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
San Angelo, Texas
As Amended:
August 9, 1978
December 10, 1980
October 10, 1981
September 11, 1982
March 6, 1996
October 14, 2009

427. BYLAWS
OF THE
CONCHO VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
PREAMBLE
We, the elected officials of local governments in the Concho Valley Region hereby join together in a
voluntary association to be known as the Concho Valley Council of Governments for the purpose of
meeting at regular intervals to discuss and study community challenges of mutual interest and concern,
and to develop policy and action recommendations for ratification and implementation by member local
governments.
We realize that our individual and common destinies rest with the interdependent actions of the local
governments which comprise our region.
This voluntary association which we have formed is a vehicle for closer cooperation and is not a new
layer of government nor a super-government. As a voluntary organization of local governments, the
members seek, by mutual agreement, solutions to mutual problems for mutual benefit.
Our goal is to retain and strengthen local home rule while combining our total resources for regional
challenges beyond our individual capabilities.
We believe that the expansion of the concept of voluntary cooperation among local governments is an
effective means for achieving this goal. We believe that cooperation must be fostered in two ways: By
strengthening the abilities of local governments to meet individual local needs; and by developing a
voluntary association (council) of local governments to meet the broader common needs.
ARTICLE I
ORGANIZATION
There is hereby organized under Chapter 391, Local Government Code, (Formerly, Article 1011M,
Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes), a regional planning commission which shall be known as the Concho
Valley Council of Governments, which shall be a voluntary association of governments.

428. ARTICLE II
PURPOSE
The Concho Valley Council of Governments shall be a voluntary organization of local governments to
foster a cooperative effort in resolving problems, policies, and plans that are common and regional. The
purpose of this organization is:
A. To join and cooperate to improve the health, safety, and general welfare of their residents;
B. To plan for the future development of communities, areas, and regions;
C. To improve the planning of transportation systems;
D. To help provide adequate street, utility, health, educational, recreational, and other essential
facilities as the communities, areas, and regions grow;
E. To recognize the needs of agriculture, business, and industry;
F. To help provide healthful surroundings for family life in residential areas;
G. To help preserve historical and cultural values;
H. To help ensure the efficient and economical use of public funds is commensurate with the growth
of the communities, areas, and regions.
I. To make studies and plans to guide the unified, far-reaching development of a region, eliminate
duplication, and promote economy and efficiency in the coordinated development of a region.

429. ARTICLE III
MEMBERSHIP
A. Requirements
1. The geographic area within which eligible members shall be located, in whole or in part, is
determined by reference to “Planning Regions for the State of Texas”, December, 1968. This
delineation of Texas into twenty-one, now twenty-four, and multi-county planning regions
was accomplished in response to a demonstrated need for improved communication and
coordination among and between the planning and related efforts of the state, federal, and
local governments. The Governor of Texas, by Executive Order, directed all state agencies to
recognize this concept. The counties included in this region are Coke, Concho, Crockett,
Irion, Kimble, Mason, McCulloch, Menard, Reagan, Schleicher, Sterling, Sutton and Tom
Green. Any additions or deletions of counties in the Concho Valley State Planning Region
which may be made from time to time by the Office of the Governor will accordingly affect
the eligibility of such counties for membership in CVCOG.
2. Members must be geographically situated within a county listed in Article III, A.1.
3. All incorporated communities within a county shall become members simultaneously with
the county. The Executive Committee may deviate from this requirement when requested if
in its opinion such a deviation would give priority to the condition that the incoming
members who are units of general local government together represent 75% of the aggregate
population of the county.
4. The membership by a county will continue the contiguous nature of the existing membership
and will not create a geographic void in the existing membership area.
5. Compliance by the member with the requirement in the Bylaws concerning financial
contributions of its members.
6. Voting membership shall be open to:
a. Member counties
b. Member cities/towns
c. Member school districts
d. Member soil and water conservation districts
e. Member River Authorities
f. Member Water Districts
g. Other special districts by permission of the Executive Committee

430. 7. Upon approval of the Executive Committee, pending final approval of the General Assembly,
eligible governmental units, public utility companies, public and private companies within the
area of the CVCOG may become associate members of the CVCOG by passage of an
ordinance, minute order, resolution or other appropriate and legal action of the governing
body of such units adopting Articles of Association and appropriating the funds required to
pay their share of the dues of the CVCOG. In no event shall an associate member in the
CVCOG be entitled to voting representation in the General Assembly or on the Executive
Committee.
B. Representation
Each member government shall be officially represented at the General Assembly as follows:
1. Each member county shall have one (1) representative who shall be an elected official, a
member of the Commissioner’s Court, and elected by the Commissioner’s Court.
2. Each member county with a population exceeding 50,000 shall have two (2) additional
representatives elected as prescribed in Article III, B.1.
3. Each member city which is incorporated shall have one (1) representative who shall be an
elected official, a member of the member city’s legislative body, and elected by that
legislative body.
4. Each member city which is incorporated and has a population exceeding 25,000 shall
have two (2) representatives who are qualified and elected as prescribed in Article III, A.
5. Each member city which is incorporated and has a population exceeding 50,000 shall
have three (3) representatives who are qualified and elected as prescribed in Article III,
A.
6. Each member independent school district with an enrollment of 10,000 or more shall
have two (2) representatives who shall be elected members of the school board.
7. Each member independent school district with an enrollment of less than 10,000 shall
have one (1) representative who shall be an elected member of the school board.
8. Member Soil and Water Conservation Districts, Member River Authorities and Water
Districts, and other member special districts shall each have one (1) representative who is
a member of its governing body and appointed by that body.
9. The population of any member governmental unit shall be determined by the preceding
United States Census. After each United States Census membership shall be adjusted
accordingly.

431. 10. As used in these Bylaws, the term “elected official” means a Mayor and other members
of the governing body of a city, town or village, a county judge, a county commissioner,
a member of the Board of Trustees of a School District, a member of the Board of
Supervisors of a Soil and Water Conservation District, or a member of the governing
body of a special district other than a Soil and Water Conservation District.
11. As used in these Bylaws, the terms “cities”, “towns”, and “villages” shall mean those
communities incorporated as such pursuant to the terms and requirements of the laws of
the State of Texas.
12. Representatives shall serve during the term of office to which they have been elected as
members of governing bodies of CVCOG member governmental units unless replaced
sooner by the appointing authority.
13. In addition to the above named members, two members of the Texas Legislature whose
districts include all or part of the Concho Valley Region shall be designated by the
Executive Committee to serve as members of the General Assembly. Such members
shall serve until a successor shall be appointed by the Executive Committee.
C. Admission and Withdrawal
1. Membership in the CVCOG shall be contingent upon execution of a resolution,
ordinance, minute order or other appropriate legal action by the governing body of the
member.
2. Withdrawal from membership may be accomplished upon execution of a resolution,
ordinance, minute order or other appropriate legal action by the governing body of the
member.
D. Dues
The CVCOG shall send each member before June 1st of each year a statement of dues for the
coming year. Each member governmental unit shall pay to CVCOG an amount equal to one
year’s dues on or before October 1st of each year. Members whose annual dues have not been
paid as of October 31st of the dues’ year shall be given written notice by certified mail, return
receipt requested, as soon thereafter as practicable of this delinquency, which notice shall include
a statement advising such member that it is delinquent and further advising that if such dues are
not paid within thirty (30) days from the date of such notice, its membership and all privileges
afforded thereby, including the right to vote, shall be terminated automatically as provided herein.
Thereafter, upon the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of such notice, any delinquent
member shall be notified by certified mail, return receipt requested, that its membership and all
privileges afforded thereby have been terminated. A terminated member shall automatically be
reinstated upon payment of all delinquent dues and the current dues, if any, then owing. The
amount of annual dues shall be as follows:

432. 1. Member counties and cities shall pay annual dues in the amount of $.05 per capita.
2. Each independent school district with an enrollment of over 10,000 shall pay annual dues
of $1,000.00.
3. All other independent school districts shall pay annual dues of $100.00.
4. All other voting members shall pay annual dues of $25.00.
5. Associate members shall pay annual dues of $200.00.
6. Annual dues by any member shall in no event be less than $25.00.
ARTICLE IV
POLICY BODIES
The CVCOG shall have two policy bodies – a General Assembly and Executive Committee.
A. General Assembly
1. Quorum. A quorum of the General Assembly shall consist of a majority of the
total representatives of the member general purpose governments. Proxies shall be in writing; stating the
name of the proxy, date of the meeting and signed by the person giving the proxy with this stipulation:
proxies may only be held by those representing the membership of the person giving the proxy, i.e. a
member who represents an entity must give his or her proxy to someone representing the same entity.
The presiding officer at the meeting shall be the sole judge of the validity of the proxy and shall identify
all proxy votes at the beginning of each meeting. Associate members shall not be included for quorum
purposes.
2. Voting. Each representative of a member government and member of the Texas
Legislature designated by the Executive Committee shall have one (1) vote in the General Assembly.
Proxies may vote at any meeting of the General Assembly for which they were duly appointed and
accepted.
3. Meetings. The General Assembly is required to meet at least one time each fiscal year of
the CVCOG. The exact date of the meeting shall be determined by the Executive
Committee. Election of officers shall be held at this meeting. The General Assembly
shall also meet upon call of its president or the Executive Committee, or by petition of at
least 10% of the membership of the General Assembly.

433. 4. Responsibilities. The responsibilities of the General Assembly are:
a. To adopt and amend Bylaws;
b. To review actions of the Executive Committee;
c. To annually elect from representatives of general purpose
member governments a President, Vice-President, Secretary, and
other officers as required.; and
d. To resolve questions arising under Article III.
5. Policy Recommendations. The General Assembly may recommend policy to
the Executive Committee which shall be the governing body of the CVCOG.
B. Executive Committee
1. Membership
a. Except when filling a vacancy, new Executive Committee members, after
being duly selected, shall assume their position on the Executive Committee beginning January
1st following their appointment.
b. Each county, within the Concho Valley region, shall have one representative
who shall be the County Judge or a County Commissioner, appointed by the Commissioner’s
Court.
c. A member city with a population of 50,000 or more (determined by the
preceding U.S. Census) shall have one (1) representative on the Executive Committee chosen
from that unit’s governing body.
d. A member independent school district with an enrollment exceeding 10,000
shall have one (1) representative on the Executive Committee chosen from that independent
school district’s representatives to the General Assembly.
e. Two members of the Texas Legislature chosen by the other members of the
Executive Committee from among the legislators whose districts include all or a portion of the
Concho Valley Region shall be voting members of the Committee. Such members shall serve
until a successor shall be appointed.
2. Officers.
a. The officers of the Executive Committee shall be Chair, Vice-Chair and Secretary.
The officers shall be elected annually by the Executive Committee.
b. Should a vacancy occur in the office of the Chair, the Vice-Chair shall become Chair
for the balance of the unexpired term. Should a vacancy occur in the office of Vice-Chair, the
Secretary shall become Vice-Chair for the balance of the unexpired term. Should a vacancy
occur in the office of the Secretary, the Executive Committee shall by simple majority of the
members present, elect a new Secretary to serve the balance of the unexpired term.
3. Quorum. A quorum of the Executive Committee shall consist of a majority of the total
members of the Executive Committee in good standing. Proxies shall be in writing; stating the
name of the proxy, date of the meeting and signed by the person giving the proxy with this

434. stipulation: proxies may only be held by fellow Executive Committee members in good standing.
The presiding officer at the meeting shall be the sole judge of the validity of the proxy and shall
identify all proxy votes at the beginning of each meeting. Proxies do not count for purposes of a
quorum.
4. Vacancies. Should any member of the Executive Committee miss three consecutive regular
meetings of such Committee without reason satisfactory to the Executive Committee, then the
Executive Committee may declare the post vacated. When a vacancy occurs on the Executive
Committee by reason or removal, resignation, death, withdrawal from public office, or any other
reason, the remaining members of the Executive Committee shall appoint an eligible replacement
until the appropriate appointing authority designates a new member.
5. Voting. Voting on routine matters in the Executive Committee requires a simple majority of
those members present and voting. Proxies may vote at any meeting of the Executive Committee
for which they were duly appointed and accepted.
6. Meetings. The Executive Committee shall meet at least monthly or on call of its Chairman, or
at the direction of the General Assembly, or upon call of at least 10% of the voting membership
of the Executive Committee.
7. Responsibilities. The responsibilities of the Executive Committee are:
a. To adopt CVCOG budget and membership fee schedules;
b. To initiate, advise and aid in the establishment of cooperative arrangements, among
local governments in the region;
c. To propose, initiate, or approve any study, policy discussion, plan, or other CVCOG
policy matters;
d. To resolve questions arising under Article IV.B.1.
e. To make recommendations to any local governments or other appropriate agencies or
entities;
f. To propose amendments to intergovernmental agreements for ratification of members;
g. To designate an Applications Review Committee pursuant to Section 204 of the
Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966, and relevant
Executive Orders, in accordance with the guidelines established by the Office of
Management and Budget.
h. To nominate a slate of officers to the General Assembly for approval and election;
i. To appoint, fix salary of, and remove Executive Director;
j. To be responsible for prescribing adequate controls for the investment, receipts,
disbursement, and accounting for all CVCOG funds.
k. To review CVCOG’s investment policy annually.

435. l. To provide for an independent audit annually, with the auditor selected pursuant to a
Request for Proposals (RFP) to be released at least every five (5) years. The maximum
number of consecutive years that an auditor may provide services shall be five (5).
m. To provide an opportunity for the state and federal governments and other agencies
having interest to participate in CVCOG activities;
n. To seek and accept contributions and grants-in-aid;
o. To provide for the duties, responsibilities and powers of officers and staff members;
p. To execute, approve execution, ratify, confirm, or authorize the execution of any
contract or any amendment of any contract in its own right or by and through the
Executive Director until such time as the Executive Committee shall by resolution
terminate such power;
q. To provide that the certification of the Executive Director to the termination or non-
termination of any power to contract, granted in these Bylaws, shall be conclusive of the
same.
ARTICLE V
STAFF
The CVCOG shall have staff as provided for by the policy bodies. The Executive Committee
shall have authority to appoint and remove the Executive Director and may authorize such other staff
positions deemed necessary to carry out the functions of the CVCOG. The Executive Director shall be
responsible for coordinating all staff and consultant services provided for to the CVCOG, preparing and
administering the Annual work program and budget, employing, retaining, and removing all other
personnel as may be necessary, performing all other duties delegated to him by the Executive Committee,
including but not limited to the power to execute contracts as hereinafter specified. When time is of the
essence, as determined by the Executive Director, said Executive Director shall have the power to execute
any and all proper contracts, agreements or amendments of the same, and said contract, agreement, or
amendment of the same shall be valid, binding and in full force and effect until such time as the Executive
Committee shall by resolution reject it. When time is not of the essence, as determined by the Executive
Director, each contract, agreement and/or amendment of the same shall be specifically approved by the
Executive Committee by Resolution attached to the same, before the same shall be binding and in full
force and effect. The certificate of the Executive Director that time is of the essence and that his
contractual powers have not been terminated shall be conclusive of the same. The Executive Committee
may require a fidelity bond, or other appropriate insurance of fidelity coverage in such amounts as seem
prudent, on designated members of the Executive Committee and staff. The premiums for such bonds or
insurance shall be paid by the CVCOG.

436. ARTICLE VI
FINANCE
A. Budget
The annual budget may be prepared in a manner that involves the splitting of the budget into a
core budget and a special projects budget. The core budget will be the basic program budget, the benefits
of which are received by all members. The special projects budget will include items of special interest
and benefit to some of the members, but not necessarily all of them. The special projects budget will be
supported by special contributions from those governments which directly benefit from the special
project.
B. Authorization to Sign Checks
Checks will be signed by the persons to be designated by the Executive Committee. The
Executive Director will certify that the item or the items for which the check is issued are payable and
where appropriate will allocate charges to a specific project.
C. Contributed Services
Financial contributions to the CVCOG may take the form of contributed services, the cash
equivalent of which can be readily determined.

437. ARTICLE VII
CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT
The solicitation and consideration of citizen viewpoints shall be achieved through the mechanism
of citizen advisory committees which shall be designated by and serve at the pleasure of the General
Assembly and/or the Executive Committee.
ARTICLE VIII
AMENDMENTS
These Bylaws may be amended (repealed) or added to at regular or special meetings of the
General Assembly, provided that ten (10) days in advance of the meeting a written notice shall have been
sent to each representative, which notice shall state the amendments or changes which are proposed to be
made in such Bylaws. Proposed amendments shall be considered to have passed if two-thirds of the
participating representatives vote in the affirmative.
******
Adopted October 7, 1967
Amended August 9, 1978
December 10, 1980
October 10, 1981
September 11, 1982
March 6, 1996
October 14, 2009