Look what we found … so what do we do now?
             Dealing with urban archaeological finds, an example from Philadelphia

                           by Kenneth J. Basalik, Ph.D. (CHRS, Inc.)


    Urban Archaeology is typified by the investigation of landscapes with complex

developmental histories that result in intricate soil stratigraphy and buried cultural components.

When exploring these multifaceted areas the non-archaeologist sees disturbances, the urban

archaeologist sees the potential for the extraordinary. If significant archaeological remains are

encountered, data recovery investigations in an urban setting can be expensive. For the non-

archaeologist who saw a disturbed landscape, such costs are unexpected. This is particularly true

for enhancement projects, where non-State agency officials often do not fully consider the cost

of environmental and archaeological studies when budgeting their projects. This paper provides a

project example of an unexpected urban find on a transportation enhancement project in an urban

setting. The work was performed in Logan Square in the City of Philadelphia

    The project was located in an area of Logan Square fronting the Cathedral Basilica of Saints

Peter and Paul is commonly referred to as Sister Cities Plaza. Center City District in conjunction

with the Federal Highway Administration proposed to make improvements to Sister Cities Plaza

to attract greater use by a diverse population of all ages, while revitalizing this prominent

landscape and enhancing views to and from the Cathedral. New elements include a re-designed

plaza and fountain commemorating Philadelphia’s Sister Cities, a Children’s Discovery Garden,

and a café with a multi-purpose educational and community room.

    Logan square is one of five squares in the City [slide 2]. Centre Square is now the location

of City Hall. Northeast square is now Franklin Square, Southwest Square is now Rittenhouse
Square; Southeast Square is now Washington Square and Northwest Square is now Logan

Square.

    Logan Square, like other squares in the city, was open space that witnessed a variety of

activities. Scharf and Westcott’s History of Philadelphia, 1609-1884 contained several

references to the use of the public square as a Potter’s Field during the early nineteenth century

[slide 3]. Although the date of the earliest interments is not known, it is presumed that the

residents of the western section of Philadelphia employed the nearby square for burial purposes

out of convenience, rather than using the distant Southeast (now Washington) Square. Upon the

closing of Washington Square to interments in 1794, additional repositories for the city’s dead

were established and the formal title of “Potter’s Field” was transferred to Logan Square.

According to Scharf and Westcott, a part of Logan Square had also been used as a graveyard for

the German Reformed Church. Philadelphia City Council declared in 1812 that “for a

considerable time the public square situated on the north side of Sassafras [now Race St.] and on

the east and west sides of Schuylkill Fourth and Fifth Streets had without any authority been

used as a place of interment for the bodies of persons dying at the almshouse, at the State prison,

and at the Pennsylvania Hospital, and of strangers not belonging to any religious society.” Both

the unauthorized use of the square and the official burials of the city were deemed, in 1812, to be

inappropriate and an infringement upon the rights of Philadelphians, and all public squares of

Philadelphia were closed to burials on July 10th of that year. [slide 4]. The discontinuation of the

square as a burial ground did not preclude the use of the land as a public execution ground,

although this practice was halted subsequent to the hanging of murderer William Gross in Logan

Square on February 7, 1823.
Between the discontinuation of the square’s use as a burying ground and the final public

execution, the square was leased from the City by the adjacent Orphan’s Society for use as a

pasture-ground. In an act of the City Council in May 1825, the names of the primary public

squares of Philadelphia were officially changed, and Northwest Square became Logan Square,

after William Penn’s secretary and prominent Philadelphian, James Logan.

    In 1853, City Council authorized the enclosure of the primary public squares with iron

railings, thereby formalizing their boundaries and limiting the type of public use of the spaces to

a park like setting. [slide 5] By 1859 the landscaping of Logan Square had been formalized, with

the planting of trees, and the establishing of walkways

    This formal park setting did not prevent Logan Square [slide 6] from being the site of the

Great Sanitary Fair of 1864, which involved the erection of temporary structures covering the

entire square. An effort to raise funds for the care of sick and wounded military of the Civil War,

this Great Fair was an enormous undertaking lasting three weeks. [slide 7]

    The Square was returned to its park setting and remained in this condition through the late

19th and early twentieth centuries [slide 8].

    The installation of the traffic circle and Swann Fountain in Logan Square [slide 9]

encompassed all of the land between Vine, 18th, Race, and 20th Streets and was completed in

1924. Contained within this area, however, is the inclusion of large pockets of green space that

are used as recreational areas that were not subjected to construction or paving.

    Archaeology was performed in parts of the Sister Cities Plaza portion of Logan Square. The

work consisted of examining the portions of the site where more than surfical disturbances were

to take place [slide 10]
Mechanical stripping reveals Fifty eight grave shafts within the APE. Fifty three of the

graves [slide 11] were found clustered together in the southeastern portion of the proposed

construction impacts located adjacent to 18th Street and directly across the street from the

Basilica of Saints Peter and Paul. The graves were regularly spaced and laid out in closely

packed rows, roughly parallel to 18th Street. .

    The majority of the graves were pinched toed in shape [slide 12]. The number and regular

placement of the graves is consistent with a formal cemetery and suggests that the burials

represent a portion of the German Reformed Church graveyard that was report by Scharf and

Westcott.

    So here we were. We had found a large number of burials within the APE that would be

disturbed by the project. Given the vast changes to Logan Square, the client had assumed a

disturbed landscape. There had initially been no money set aside for archaeology. Money had

been found for a limited Phase I archaeological survey, but now as many as 58 burials could be

impacted. As much as I personally would have relished the excavation of the burials, we needed

another option. Excavation the burials had legal, ethical, social, and political ramifications in

addition to funding issues.

    The solution was incredibly simple and a solution that is often overlooked by archaeologists.

The solution was to talk with the architects. [Slide 13] By working directly with the design team

we could place the problem before them and discuss the ramifications of each action. Avoidance

was the best alternative, but given the limited area examined and the presence of scatter burials

elsewhere on the site moving elements around on the site, might mean more archaeology. Plus

certain elements, such as utilities, could not easily be moved. Ultimately a solution was found.

The design was revised to limit the depth of the foundation and utility trenches to a point above
where the tops of the burials were encountered. To ensure that no inadvertent exposure would

occur the archaeological investigation were covered with a white sand to identify the location of

top of burial and an archaeological monitor was present during the excavations associated with

the foundation fabrication and utility installation. This solution could not be used for the main

utility box hook up. The box needed to be set deep enough to access utilities in the street and

provide sufficient room. Fortunately, it was possible to move the box to a location that

archaeological testing had indicated contained no burials.

    Where the non-archaeologists saw disturbances, the urban archaeologist found the

extraordinary and was the penny pinching hero of the day, rather than the expensive goat. In the

end, the burials were protected and the project moved forward [Slide 14].

Dealing With Urban Archaeological Finds, an Example from Philadelphia

  • 1.
    Look what wefound … so what do we do now? Dealing with urban archaeological finds, an example from Philadelphia by Kenneth J. Basalik, Ph.D. (CHRS, Inc.) Urban Archaeology is typified by the investigation of landscapes with complex developmental histories that result in intricate soil stratigraphy and buried cultural components. When exploring these multifaceted areas the non-archaeologist sees disturbances, the urban archaeologist sees the potential for the extraordinary. If significant archaeological remains are encountered, data recovery investigations in an urban setting can be expensive. For the non- archaeologist who saw a disturbed landscape, such costs are unexpected. This is particularly true for enhancement projects, where non-State agency officials often do not fully consider the cost of environmental and archaeological studies when budgeting their projects. This paper provides a project example of an unexpected urban find on a transportation enhancement project in an urban setting. The work was performed in Logan Square in the City of Philadelphia The project was located in an area of Logan Square fronting the Cathedral Basilica of Saints Peter and Paul is commonly referred to as Sister Cities Plaza. Center City District in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration proposed to make improvements to Sister Cities Plaza to attract greater use by a diverse population of all ages, while revitalizing this prominent landscape and enhancing views to and from the Cathedral. New elements include a re-designed plaza and fountain commemorating Philadelphia’s Sister Cities, a Children’s Discovery Garden, and a café with a multi-purpose educational and community room. Logan square is one of five squares in the City [slide 2]. Centre Square is now the location of City Hall. Northeast square is now Franklin Square, Southwest Square is now Rittenhouse
  • 2.
    Square; Southeast Squareis now Washington Square and Northwest Square is now Logan Square. Logan Square, like other squares in the city, was open space that witnessed a variety of activities. Scharf and Westcott’s History of Philadelphia, 1609-1884 contained several references to the use of the public square as a Potter’s Field during the early nineteenth century [slide 3]. Although the date of the earliest interments is not known, it is presumed that the residents of the western section of Philadelphia employed the nearby square for burial purposes out of convenience, rather than using the distant Southeast (now Washington) Square. Upon the closing of Washington Square to interments in 1794, additional repositories for the city’s dead were established and the formal title of “Potter’s Field” was transferred to Logan Square. According to Scharf and Westcott, a part of Logan Square had also been used as a graveyard for the German Reformed Church. Philadelphia City Council declared in 1812 that “for a considerable time the public square situated on the north side of Sassafras [now Race St.] and on the east and west sides of Schuylkill Fourth and Fifth Streets had without any authority been used as a place of interment for the bodies of persons dying at the almshouse, at the State prison, and at the Pennsylvania Hospital, and of strangers not belonging to any religious society.” Both the unauthorized use of the square and the official burials of the city were deemed, in 1812, to be inappropriate and an infringement upon the rights of Philadelphians, and all public squares of Philadelphia were closed to burials on July 10th of that year. [slide 4]. The discontinuation of the square as a burial ground did not preclude the use of the land as a public execution ground, although this practice was halted subsequent to the hanging of murderer William Gross in Logan Square on February 7, 1823.
  • 3.
    Between the discontinuationof the square’s use as a burying ground and the final public execution, the square was leased from the City by the adjacent Orphan’s Society for use as a pasture-ground. In an act of the City Council in May 1825, the names of the primary public squares of Philadelphia were officially changed, and Northwest Square became Logan Square, after William Penn’s secretary and prominent Philadelphian, James Logan. In 1853, City Council authorized the enclosure of the primary public squares with iron railings, thereby formalizing their boundaries and limiting the type of public use of the spaces to a park like setting. [slide 5] By 1859 the landscaping of Logan Square had been formalized, with the planting of trees, and the establishing of walkways This formal park setting did not prevent Logan Square [slide 6] from being the site of the Great Sanitary Fair of 1864, which involved the erection of temporary structures covering the entire square. An effort to raise funds for the care of sick and wounded military of the Civil War, this Great Fair was an enormous undertaking lasting three weeks. [slide 7] The Square was returned to its park setting and remained in this condition through the late 19th and early twentieth centuries [slide 8]. The installation of the traffic circle and Swann Fountain in Logan Square [slide 9] encompassed all of the land between Vine, 18th, Race, and 20th Streets and was completed in 1924. Contained within this area, however, is the inclusion of large pockets of green space that are used as recreational areas that were not subjected to construction or paving. Archaeology was performed in parts of the Sister Cities Plaza portion of Logan Square. The work consisted of examining the portions of the site where more than surfical disturbances were to take place [slide 10]
  • 4.
    Mechanical stripping revealsFifty eight grave shafts within the APE. Fifty three of the graves [slide 11] were found clustered together in the southeastern portion of the proposed construction impacts located adjacent to 18th Street and directly across the street from the Basilica of Saints Peter and Paul. The graves were regularly spaced and laid out in closely packed rows, roughly parallel to 18th Street. . The majority of the graves were pinched toed in shape [slide 12]. The number and regular placement of the graves is consistent with a formal cemetery and suggests that the burials represent a portion of the German Reformed Church graveyard that was report by Scharf and Westcott. So here we were. We had found a large number of burials within the APE that would be disturbed by the project. Given the vast changes to Logan Square, the client had assumed a disturbed landscape. There had initially been no money set aside for archaeology. Money had been found for a limited Phase I archaeological survey, but now as many as 58 burials could be impacted. As much as I personally would have relished the excavation of the burials, we needed another option. Excavation the burials had legal, ethical, social, and political ramifications in addition to funding issues. The solution was incredibly simple and a solution that is often overlooked by archaeologists. The solution was to talk with the architects. [Slide 13] By working directly with the design team we could place the problem before them and discuss the ramifications of each action. Avoidance was the best alternative, but given the limited area examined and the presence of scatter burials elsewhere on the site moving elements around on the site, might mean more archaeology. Plus certain elements, such as utilities, could not easily be moved. Ultimately a solution was found. The design was revised to limit the depth of the foundation and utility trenches to a point above
  • 5.
    where the topsof the burials were encountered. To ensure that no inadvertent exposure would occur the archaeological investigation were covered with a white sand to identify the location of top of burial and an archaeological monitor was present during the excavations associated with the foundation fabrication and utility installation. This solution could not be used for the main utility box hook up. The box needed to be set deep enough to access utilities in the street and provide sufficient room. Fortunately, it was possible to move the box to a location that archaeological testing had indicated contained no burials. Where the non-archaeologists saw disturbances, the urban archaeologist found the extraordinary and was the penny pinching hero of the day, rather than the expensive goat. In the end, the burials were protected and the project moved forward [Slide 14].