The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data about Daviess County, Indiana from 2000-2013/2011. It shows that the county's population grew 9% between 2000-2013 primarily due to natural increase. The number of establishments in the county increased 61% between 2000-2011 mostly through new business formation. While educational attainment among adults has risen, many still only have a high school degree or less. The data can help guide local decision-making.
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data about Tippecanoe County, Indiana from 2000-2013. Some key findings include:
- The county's population increased 21% from 2000-2013, largely due to natural increase and international migration.
- Educational attainment among adults 25+ improved, with 43% now having at least a college degree.
- The number of business establishments grew 78% from 2000-2011, primarily through new business formation rather than relocation.
- Most establishments are small, with 58% having 2-9 employees in 2011.
The document provides data about Boone County including demographics, economic, and labor market information. Some key points:
- The population of Boone County increased 31% between 2000-2013 primarily due to domestic in-migration. Domestic migration accounted for nearly 11,000 new residents over this period.
- Educational attainment among adults 25+ improved significantly from 2000-2013, with the percentage of adults with a bachelor's degree or higher increasing from 28% to 41%.
- The number of establishments in Boone County nearly doubled from 2000-2011, growing from 2,738 to 5,170. Most of this growth was due to the creation of new establishments rather than the relocation of existing ones
The document describes Data Snapshot Reports produced by the Purdue Center for Regional Development (PCRD) that provide concise summaries of demographic and economic trends impacting counties in Indiana. The reports use graphics and data on topics like labor, demography, commuting, and economy to help local leaders understand changes in their county and region. They highlight national trends affecting counties and how understanding local data can help accelerate strategic planning to build prosperous futures. The reports aim to provide a common foundation for collaboration among leaders addressing economic and social shifts.
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data about Steuben County, Indiana from 2000-2014. It shows that the total population increased slightly and is aging, with more residents over 50. Educational attainment among adults increased, though many still only have a high school degree. The number of establishments and jobs grew, led by manufacturing, retail, and healthcare. Four of the top five industries lost jobs during this period, with manufacturing declining the most.
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data about Marion County, Indiana from 2000-2013/2011. Some key findings include:
- The county's population grew 8% from 2000-2013 primarily through natural increase, while domestic migration decreased the population. International migration increased the population.
- The population is aging as the number of residents over 50 increased from 24% to 30% of residents from 2000-2013.
- The number of establishments in the county doubled from 2000-2011 primarily through natural change as more opened than closed.
- The county became more racially/ethnically diverse over this period and educational attainment among adults increased slightly.
This document provides a regional snapshot of demographic and economic data for the East Central Indiana Regional Partnership (ECIRP) region. It analyzes data on the region's population, demographics, human capital, labor force, and industries. Some key findings include:
- The region's population declined 2.4% from 2002-2013 while the rest of Indiana grew 7.7%. Domestic out-migration was the main driver of population loss.
- The region has an aging population, with 37% of residents over 50 compared to 33% for the rest of Indiana. Median income declined while income inequality increased from 2002-2013.
- Educational attainment is lower in the region, where 56% of adults
The document provides a regional snapshot of Northwest Indiana. It summarizes key demographics, human capital, labor force, and industry data for the region. Specifically:
- The population of Northwest Indiana grew 3.4% from 2002-2013, slower than the rest of the state. The region is expected to grow around 4% from 2013-2020, keeping pace with other parts of Indiana.
- Educational attainment in the region mirrors the state overall, except fewer residents have a bachelor's degree or higher (20% vs 24% elsewhere). Patenting and innovation rates also lag the rest of the state.
- Unemployment rose more in the region during the Great Recession but has been declining,
The document provides an overview of a regional snapshot analysis of the North Central Indiana region. It analyzes demographic, human capital, labor force, and industry data to assess the economic performance of the five-county region. Some key findings include:
- The region's population declined 2.8% from 2002-2013 while the rest of Indiana grew 7.1%, and the region is expected to continue losing population share relative to the state.
- Educational attainment levels are lower in the region compared to the rest of Indiana, and median income has decreased in the region from 2002-2013.
- Unemployment spiked higher in the region during the Great Recession and took longer to recover, though earnings per worker
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data about Tippecanoe County, Indiana from 2000-2013. Some key findings include:
- The county's population increased 21% from 2000-2013, largely due to natural increase and international migration.
- Educational attainment among adults 25+ improved, with 43% now having at least a college degree.
- The number of business establishments grew 78% from 2000-2011, primarily through new business formation rather than relocation.
- Most establishments are small, with 58% having 2-9 employees in 2011.
The document provides data about Boone County including demographics, economic, and labor market information. Some key points:
- The population of Boone County increased 31% between 2000-2013 primarily due to domestic in-migration. Domestic migration accounted for nearly 11,000 new residents over this period.
- Educational attainment among adults 25+ improved significantly from 2000-2013, with the percentage of adults with a bachelor's degree or higher increasing from 28% to 41%.
- The number of establishments in Boone County nearly doubled from 2000-2011, growing from 2,738 to 5,170. Most of this growth was due to the creation of new establishments rather than the relocation of existing ones
The document describes Data Snapshot Reports produced by the Purdue Center for Regional Development (PCRD) that provide concise summaries of demographic and economic trends impacting counties in Indiana. The reports use graphics and data on topics like labor, demography, commuting, and economy to help local leaders understand changes in their county and region. They highlight national trends affecting counties and how understanding local data can help accelerate strategic planning to build prosperous futures. The reports aim to provide a common foundation for collaboration among leaders addressing economic and social shifts.
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data about Steuben County, Indiana from 2000-2014. It shows that the total population increased slightly and is aging, with more residents over 50. Educational attainment among adults increased, though many still only have a high school degree. The number of establishments and jobs grew, led by manufacturing, retail, and healthcare. Four of the top five industries lost jobs during this period, with manufacturing declining the most.
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data about Marion County, Indiana from 2000-2013/2011. Some key findings include:
- The county's population grew 8% from 2000-2013 primarily through natural increase, while domestic migration decreased the population. International migration increased the population.
- The population is aging as the number of residents over 50 increased from 24% to 30% of residents from 2000-2013.
- The number of establishments in the county doubled from 2000-2011 primarily through natural change as more opened than closed.
- The county became more racially/ethnically diverse over this period and educational attainment among adults increased slightly.
This document provides a regional snapshot of demographic and economic data for the East Central Indiana Regional Partnership (ECIRP) region. It analyzes data on the region's population, demographics, human capital, labor force, and industries. Some key findings include:
- The region's population declined 2.4% from 2002-2013 while the rest of Indiana grew 7.7%. Domestic out-migration was the main driver of population loss.
- The region has an aging population, with 37% of residents over 50 compared to 33% for the rest of Indiana. Median income declined while income inequality increased from 2002-2013.
- Educational attainment is lower in the region, where 56% of adults
The document provides a regional snapshot of Northwest Indiana. It summarizes key demographics, human capital, labor force, and industry data for the region. Specifically:
- The population of Northwest Indiana grew 3.4% from 2002-2013, slower than the rest of the state. The region is expected to grow around 4% from 2013-2020, keeping pace with other parts of Indiana.
- Educational attainment in the region mirrors the state overall, except fewer residents have a bachelor's degree or higher (20% vs 24% elsewhere). Patenting and innovation rates also lag the rest of the state.
- Unemployment rose more in the region during the Great Recession but has been declining,
The document provides an overview of a regional snapshot analysis of the North Central Indiana region. It analyzes demographic, human capital, labor force, and industry data to assess the economic performance of the five-county region. Some key findings include:
- The region's population declined 2.8% from 2002-2013 while the rest of Indiana grew 7.1%, and the region is expected to continue losing population share relative to the state.
- Educational attainment levels are lower in the region compared to the rest of Indiana, and median income has decreased in the region from 2002-2013.
- Unemployment spiked higher in the region during the Great Recession and took longer to recover, though earnings per worker
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data for Rush County, Indiana from various sources. It summarizes that the county's population decreased 7% from 2000-2013 primarily due to domestic out-migration. The population is aging with declines in prime working age residents. Educational attainment has increased slightly but nearly half of adults only have a high school degree. The economy saw a 35% increase in establishments from 2000-2011 primarily through new business formation. Top employers are in manufacturing and healthcare. Manufacturing jobs declined 39% from 2002-2013 while government is the largest industry.
Pulaski County experienced steady growth in the number of business establishments between 2000 and 2011. The number of establishments increased by 311, or 31%, due entirely to new businesses being launched within the county. By 2011, there were 1,304 total establishments, the majority of which (55%) had between 2-9 employees. Only 2 establishments had over 500 employees. While economic growth has occurred, most businesses in Pulaski County remain small in size.
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data for Perry County. It shows that while the total population increased slightly from 2000 to 2013, domestic out-migration exceeded in-migration. The population is aging and becoming more educated. The number of establishments and jobs in the county grew significantly from 2000 to 2011, led by natural business formation. Manufacturing is the top employer but lost jobs since 2002, while accommodation and food services gained jobs.
The document provides data about Clinton County, Indiana from 2000-2013/2020. It covers topics such as demography, economy, and labor market. Some key findings are:
- The county's population declined slightly between 2000-2013 due to domestic migration out of the county outpacing international migration and natural growth.
- The population is aging as the proportion of residents over 50 increased while the proportion of working-age residents declined.
- The Hispanic population doubled between 2000-2013, increasing their share of the county's population.
- Educational attainment rose but nearly half of adults still only have a high school degree.
- The number of business establishments grew 36% from 2000-2011, primarily through new
The number of establishments in Harrison County doubled between 2000 and 2011, largely due to the natural increase of new businesses being launched. By 2011, the majority of establishments (57%) fell into Stage 1, having 2-9 employees. The top five employers in 2015 included Horseshoe Southern Indiana casino, Harrison County Hospital, Tyson Foods, Blue River Services housing nonprofit, and ICON Metal Forming, producing a mix of local, national and global goods and services.
The population of Harrison County increased 14% between 2000-2013, driven by natural increase and domestic in-migration. While the population grew, it aged, as seen in shifting population pyramids. The number of establishments doubled from 2000-2011, primarily through new establishments rather than relocating establishments. Top employers span local, national, and global industries. Government and manufacturing jobs declined the most between 2002-2013, while real estate grew 38%.
This document provides a summary of demographic, economic, and labor market data for Jefferson County. The population increased slightly between 2000 and 2013, driven primarily by natural growth and domestic migration. The population is aging, with fewer residents of prime working age. Educational attainment improved modestly over this period. The county saw significant growth in the number of establishments between 2000 and 2011, largely through new business formation. The largest industries are manufacturing, government, retail trade, and healthcare, although manufacturing experienced job losses since 2002.
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data for Jackson County, Indiana from various sources. It shows that from 2000-2013 the population grew 5% to over 43,000 people, driven by natural increase and international migration. The number of establishments increased 33% during this period, with most growth coming from new businesses. Manufacturing is the top industry, employing 24.9% of the workforce. Educational attainment has improved but still lags the state average, with only 14% of adults having a bachelor's degree or higher.
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data for Jackson County, Indiana from various sources. It shows that from 2000-2013 the population grew 5% to over 43,000 people, driven by natural increase and international migration. The number of establishments increased 33% during this period, with most growth coming from new businesses. Manufacturing is the top industry, employing over 6,000, though transportation and warehousing jobs declined 33%. Educational attainment improved but still lags the state average.
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data and analysis for Floyd County, Indiana. It summarizes that between 2000-2013, the county's population grew by 8% largely due to natural increase and domestic migration. While the population grew, it also aged as the proportion of residents under 50 declined. The county saw increases in racial, ethnic, and educational diversity over this period. Regarding the economy, the number of establishments doubled from 2000-2011 primarily through new business formation. The top five industries were government, manufacturing, healthcare, retail, and accommodation/food services, employing over 59% of workers. Government and healthcare added jobs while manufacturing and retail lost jobs from 2002-2013.
The total population of Floyd County increased by 8% between 2000 and 2013, driven by natural increase and domestic migration. The population is aging as the proportion of residents under 50 is declining. While remaining mostly white, racial and ethnic diversity is growing slowly. Educational attainment improved with more adults holding college degrees.
The document provides a summary of demographic, economic, and labor market data for LaPorte County from 2000-2013/2014. Some key points:
- The county's population grew modestly between 2000-2013 primarily due to natural increase, while domestic migration declined.
- The population is aging and becoming more racially/ethnically diverse, with the Hispanic population nearly doubling.
- Educational attainment among adults increased slightly but many still only have a high school degree.
- The number of establishments doubled from 2000-2011, mostly due to new business formation.
- The largest industries are manufacturing, government, and retail, though most lost jobs between 2002-2013 except food/ac
The document provides a summary of demographic, economic, and labor market data for LaPorte County, Indiana from 2000-2013. Some key points:
- The county's population grew modestly between 2000-2013 primarily due to natural increase, while domestic migration declined.
- The population is aging and becoming more racially diverse, with growth in the Hispanic population.
- Educational attainment among adults has risen with more associate's and bachelor's degrees.
- The number of establishments doubled from 2000-2011, mostly due to new business formation. The top industries are manufacturing, government, and retail, though manufacturing jobs declined significantly.
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data about LaPorte County, Indiana from 2000-2013. It summarizes that the total population increased slightly from 2000-2013 primarily due to natural growth. The number of establishments in LaPorte County doubled from 2000-2011 mostly through new business startups. Manufacturing is the top employer in the county, providing nearly 15% of all jobs. The population is aging and educational attainment has risen slightly, though many residents still only have a high school degree.
The document provides an overview and analysis of demographic and economic indicators for the Radius Indiana region, which comprises 8 counties in south central Indiana. Some key findings include:
1) The population of the Radius region grew more slowly than the rest of Indiana from 2002-2012 and has an aging population profile.
2) Educational attainment levels are lower in the Radius region, which may limit its ability to attract high-quality jobs. However, high school graduation rates exceed the state average.
3) The Radius region lags the rest of Indiana in measures of innovation like patents per capita and average earnings are lower, especially for women.
4) Unemployment peaked at a lower level in the Radius region
The document provides a data snapshot of demographic, economic, and labor market information for Marion County. It experienced population growth between 2000-2013 primarily through natural increase, though domestic migration was negative. The population became more racially/ethnically diverse and older during this period. The county saw a doubling in the number of establishments from 2000-2011, largely through business startups. The top five industries were health care, government, retail, manufacturing, and administrative/support services, accounting for around half of all jobs.
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data for Anderson County. Some key points:
- The county's population decreased slightly from 2010-2015 due mostly to domestic out-migration.
- Educational attainment has increased while the population has gotten older and more diverse.
- The number of establishments increased slightly, with growth in medium-sized businesses. The accommodation/food services industry saw the largest growth.
- The top five industries employ 70% of workers, led by healthcare/social assistance. Construction and accommodation/food saw job gains while transportation lost jobs.
- Office/administrative and sales occupations make up the largest shares of jobs.
The document provides data on demographics, economic, and labor market conditions in Lake County from 2000-2012. Some key findings include:
- The population grew 2% to nearly 507,000, primarily through natural increase as out-migration exceeded in-migration. The population is aging as those under 50 declined.
- The number of establishments doubled to over 32,000, mostly through new startups. Most establishments have 1-9 employees.
- The largest industry is health care/social assistance, employing 34,000. Manufacturing and retail also employ over 25,000 each.
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data and analysis for Clinton County. Between 2000-2013, Clinton County's population declined slightly due to domestic out-migration outweighing natural growth and international immigration. The number of establishments in the county grew 36% from 2000-2011 primarily through new business formation. The largest industries are manufacturing, government, and health care, though transportation and warehousing saw the largest employment growth between 2002-2013.
The document provides a summary of demographic, economic, and labor market data for LaPorte County, Indiana from 2000-2013. Some key points:
- The county's population grew modestly from 2000-2013 primarily due to natural increase, while domestic migration declined.
- The population is aging and becoming more racially diverse, with growth in the Hispanic population.
- Educational attainment among adults increased, though many still only have a high school degree.
- The number of establishments doubled from 2000-2011, largely due to new business formation. Manufacturing remains the top employer despite job losses.
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data and analysis for Lake County. It shows that between 2000-2012 the population grew modestly due to natural increase, though many young people moved away. The population became more diverse and better educated. The economy saw strong growth in establishments, especially small businesses. Top industries like healthcare and manufacturing declined slightly while others like construction grew. Office and administrative jobs make up the largest occupation.
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data and analysis for Lake County. It shows that between 2000-2012 the population grew modestly due to natural increase, though many young people moved out. The population is aging and becoming more diverse. The number of establishments doubled from 2000-2011 primarily through new business formation. Health care and social assistance is the largest industry, providing the most jobs. Office and administrative support and sales are the top occupations. Educational attainment among residents has increased.
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data for Rush County, Indiana from various sources. It summarizes that the county's population decreased 7% from 2000-2013 primarily due to domestic out-migration. The population is aging with declines in prime working age residents. Educational attainment has increased slightly but nearly half of adults only have a high school degree. The economy saw a 35% increase in establishments from 2000-2011 primarily through new business formation. Top employers are in manufacturing and healthcare. Manufacturing jobs declined 39% from 2002-2013 while government is the largest industry.
Pulaski County experienced steady growth in the number of business establishments between 2000 and 2011. The number of establishments increased by 311, or 31%, due entirely to new businesses being launched within the county. By 2011, there were 1,304 total establishments, the majority of which (55%) had between 2-9 employees. Only 2 establishments had over 500 employees. While economic growth has occurred, most businesses in Pulaski County remain small in size.
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data for Perry County. It shows that while the total population increased slightly from 2000 to 2013, domestic out-migration exceeded in-migration. The population is aging and becoming more educated. The number of establishments and jobs in the county grew significantly from 2000 to 2011, led by natural business formation. Manufacturing is the top employer but lost jobs since 2002, while accommodation and food services gained jobs.
The document provides data about Clinton County, Indiana from 2000-2013/2020. It covers topics such as demography, economy, and labor market. Some key findings are:
- The county's population declined slightly between 2000-2013 due to domestic migration out of the county outpacing international migration and natural growth.
- The population is aging as the proportion of residents over 50 increased while the proportion of working-age residents declined.
- The Hispanic population doubled between 2000-2013, increasing their share of the county's population.
- Educational attainment rose but nearly half of adults still only have a high school degree.
- The number of business establishments grew 36% from 2000-2011, primarily through new
The number of establishments in Harrison County doubled between 2000 and 2011, largely due to the natural increase of new businesses being launched. By 2011, the majority of establishments (57%) fell into Stage 1, having 2-9 employees. The top five employers in 2015 included Horseshoe Southern Indiana casino, Harrison County Hospital, Tyson Foods, Blue River Services housing nonprofit, and ICON Metal Forming, producing a mix of local, national and global goods and services.
The population of Harrison County increased 14% between 2000-2013, driven by natural increase and domestic in-migration. While the population grew, it aged, as seen in shifting population pyramids. The number of establishments doubled from 2000-2011, primarily through new establishments rather than relocating establishments. Top employers span local, national, and global industries. Government and manufacturing jobs declined the most between 2002-2013, while real estate grew 38%.
This document provides a summary of demographic, economic, and labor market data for Jefferson County. The population increased slightly between 2000 and 2013, driven primarily by natural growth and domestic migration. The population is aging, with fewer residents of prime working age. Educational attainment improved modestly over this period. The county saw significant growth in the number of establishments between 2000 and 2011, largely through new business formation. The largest industries are manufacturing, government, retail trade, and healthcare, although manufacturing experienced job losses since 2002.
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data for Jackson County, Indiana from various sources. It shows that from 2000-2013 the population grew 5% to over 43,000 people, driven by natural increase and international migration. The number of establishments increased 33% during this period, with most growth coming from new businesses. Manufacturing is the top industry, employing 24.9% of the workforce. Educational attainment has improved but still lags the state average, with only 14% of adults having a bachelor's degree or higher.
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data for Jackson County, Indiana from various sources. It shows that from 2000-2013 the population grew 5% to over 43,000 people, driven by natural increase and international migration. The number of establishments increased 33% during this period, with most growth coming from new businesses. Manufacturing is the top industry, employing over 6,000, though transportation and warehousing jobs declined 33%. Educational attainment improved but still lags the state average.
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data and analysis for Floyd County, Indiana. It summarizes that between 2000-2013, the county's population grew by 8% largely due to natural increase and domestic migration. While the population grew, it also aged as the proportion of residents under 50 declined. The county saw increases in racial, ethnic, and educational diversity over this period. Regarding the economy, the number of establishments doubled from 2000-2011 primarily through new business formation. The top five industries were government, manufacturing, healthcare, retail, and accommodation/food services, employing over 59% of workers. Government and healthcare added jobs while manufacturing and retail lost jobs from 2002-2013.
The total population of Floyd County increased by 8% between 2000 and 2013, driven by natural increase and domestic migration. The population is aging as the proportion of residents under 50 is declining. While remaining mostly white, racial and ethnic diversity is growing slowly. Educational attainment improved with more adults holding college degrees.
The document provides a summary of demographic, economic, and labor market data for LaPorte County from 2000-2013/2014. Some key points:
- The county's population grew modestly between 2000-2013 primarily due to natural increase, while domestic migration declined.
- The population is aging and becoming more racially/ethnically diverse, with the Hispanic population nearly doubling.
- Educational attainment among adults increased slightly but many still only have a high school degree.
- The number of establishments doubled from 2000-2011, mostly due to new business formation.
- The largest industries are manufacturing, government, and retail, though most lost jobs between 2002-2013 except food/ac
The document provides a summary of demographic, economic, and labor market data for LaPorte County, Indiana from 2000-2013. Some key points:
- The county's population grew modestly between 2000-2013 primarily due to natural increase, while domestic migration declined.
- The population is aging and becoming more racially diverse, with growth in the Hispanic population.
- Educational attainment among adults has risen with more associate's and bachelor's degrees.
- The number of establishments doubled from 2000-2011, mostly due to new business formation. The top industries are manufacturing, government, and retail, though manufacturing jobs declined significantly.
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data about LaPorte County, Indiana from 2000-2013. It summarizes that the total population increased slightly from 2000-2013 primarily due to natural growth. The number of establishments in LaPorte County doubled from 2000-2011 mostly through new business startups. Manufacturing is the top employer in the county, providing nearly 15% of all jobs. The population is aging and educational attainment has risen slightly, though many residents still only have a high school degree.
The document provides an overview and analysis of demographic and economic indicators for the Radius Indiana region, which comprises 8 counties in south central Indiana. Some key findings include:
1) The population of the Radius region grew more slowly than the rest of Indiana from 2002-2012 and has an aging population profile.
2) Educational attainment levels are lower in the Radius region, which may limit its ability to attract high-quality jobs. However, high school graduation rates exceed the state average.
3) The Radius region lags the rest of Indiana in measures of innovation like patents per capita and average earnings are lower, especially for women.
4) Unemployment peaked at a lower level in the Radius region
The document provides a data snapshot of demographic, economic, and labor market information for Marion County. It experienced population growth between 2000-2013 primarily through natural increase, though domestic migration was negative. The population became more racially/ethnically diverse and older during this period. The county saw a doubling in the number of establishments from 2000-2011, largely through business startups. The top five industries were health care, government, retail, manufacturing, and administrative/support services, accounting for around half of all jobs.
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data for Anderson County. Some key points:
- The county's population decreased slightly from 2010-2015 due mostly to domestic out-migration.
- Educational attainment has increased while the population has gotten older and more diverse.
- The number of establishments increased slightly, with growth in medium-sized businesses. The accommodation/food services industry saw the largest growth.
- The top five industries employ 70% of workers, led by healthcare/social assistance. Construction and accommodation/food saw job gains while transportation lost jobs.
- Office/administrative and sales occupations make up the largest shares of jobs.
The document provides data on demographics, economic, and labor market conditions in Lake County from 2000-2012. Some key findings include:
- The population grew 2% to nearly 507,000, primarily through natural increase as out-migration exceeded in-migration. The population is aging as those under 50 declined.
- The number of establishments doubled to over 32,000, mostly through new startups. Most establishments have 1-9 employees.
- The largest industry is health care/social assistance, employing 34,000. Manufacturing and retail also employ over 25,000 each.
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data and analysis for Clinton County. Between 2000-2013, Clinton County's population declined slightly due to domestic out-migration outweighing natural growth and international immigration. The number of establishments in the county grew 36% from 2000-2011 primarily through new business formation. The largest industries are manufacturing, government, and health care, though transportation and warehousing saw the largest employment growth between 2002-2013.
The document provides a summary of demographic, economic, and labor market data for LaPorte County, Indiana from 2000-2013. Some key points:
- The county's population grew modestly from 2000-2013 primarily due to natural increase, while domestic migration declined.
- The population is aging and becoming more racially diverse, with growth in the Hispanic population.
- Educational attainment among adults increased, though many still only have a high school degree.
- The number of establishments doubled from 2000-2011, largely due to new business formation. Manufacturing remains the top employer despite job losses.
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data and analysis for Lake County. It shows that between 2000-2012 the population grew modestly due to natural increase, though many young people moved away. The population became more diverse and better educated. The economy saw strong growth in establishments, especially small businesses. Top industries like healthcare and manufacturing declined slightly while others like construction grew. Office and administrative jobs make up the largest occupation.
The document provides demographic, economic, and labor market data and analysis for Lake County. It shows that between 2000-2012 the population grew modestly due to natural increase, though many young people moved out. The population is aging and becoming more diverse. The number of establishments doubled from 2000-2011 primarily through new business formation. Health care and social assistance is the largest industry, providing the most jobs. Office and administrative support and sales are the top occupations. Educational attainment among residents has increased.
This document provides a housing strategy for Dubois County. It analyzes regional competition, the local housing market, demand factors, and proposes a housing strategy. Key points include: Dubois County's population and housing growth has slowed compared to surrounding counties. The local housing market shows recovery from the recession but a lack of affordable and alternative housing options. The strategy proposes pilot projects to develop affordable and diverse housing, especially in Jasper, to attract and retain employees.
Williamson County, Texas: Changing Demographics and Implications of GrowthCivic Analytics LLC
Williamson County is growing rapidly due to migration from other areas, especially Travis County. The population is becoming more diverse, with the Hispanic population projected to be over half of new residents in the next 20 years. This presents challenges around education and income inequality but also opportunities if inclusive economic development policies are pursued. Growth represents both challenges and opportunities for Williamson County to leverage as it takes on a more prominent role in the Austin region.
The State of Erie County and the City of SanduskyGSPAdmin
The document provides an overview of national, regional, and local economic indicators to analyze the state of Erie County and the City of Sandusky, Ohio. At the national level, it shows the U.S. has recovered from the COVID-19 pandemic, with record low unemployment but declining workforce participation. For Erie County and Sandusky specifically, it highlights population declines, an aging population, lower educational attainment compared to peer communities, and industries like manufacturing and tourism. Benchmarking against similar peer communities finds Erie County and Sandusky lag in areas like population and workforce growth.
A brief presentation of recent population trends in Illinois from 2010 to 2017 along with related commentary. This is part of an ongoing series of presentations on topics relevant to Illinois and the U.S. midwest.
Estimating Needs of Seminole County, FLAndrew Pagano
Seminole County, Florida has experienced significant population growth over the last several decades, doubling in population between 1940 and 1960, and surging over 300% between 1980 and 1990. Several models were used to project the 2010 population but most underestimated the growth, with the best match being a polynomial model. The county also saw a boom and bust in the housing market between 2003 and 2009. Projections estimate an unmet housing demand of over 66,000 units between 2011-2020 to meet needs.
This document summarizes recent population trends in Illinois based on Census Bureau data. It finds that:
- Illinois has experienced a net population loss over the last decade, losing over 159,000 residents between 2010-2019, while neighboring states like Indiana and Minnesota have grown.
- Both rural and urban areas of Illinois have seen population declines, with the Chicago metro area losing over 94,000 residents between 2013-2018, an unprecedented loss.
- Only 7 of Illinois' 102 counties grew between 2018-2019, and few have seen gains this decade, putting Illinois at risk of losing a congressional seat after the 2020 Census if trends continue.
MC_forecasts_finals series 17_feb2024.pdfARCResearch
Final summary slide deck for Series 17 population, employment by sector, age group forecasts for MPO region, counties, and smaller areas...February 2024
The document provides an overview and analysis of demographic and economic indicators for the River Hills region in Indiana. It finds that from 2002 to 2013, the region's population grew at a faster rate than the rest of the state, driven primarily by domestic migration and natural increase. The population is slightly older than the state overall. Educational attainment levels are lower in the region compared to the state, though high school graduation rates increased and surpassed the state by 2013. The region also has lower rates of bachelor's degree attainment. Income inequality appears to be rising as median incomes decreased while per capita incomes and poverty increased from 2002 to 2013.
Kansas City Metro Area Economic-Demographic Overviewjeffpinkerton
The document provides an economic and demographic overview of the Kansas City metropolitan area as of April 2013. It summarizes data on the population, demographics, income levels, and industry specializations of the bi-state region comprised of 15 counties across Missouri and Kansas. The population of the Kansas City MSA is estimated at over 2 million people as of 2012, with the majority living in either Jackson or Johnson counties. The region has experienced steady population growth in recent decades and higher than average educational attainment levels compared to the nation.
The document analyzes changes in demographics and policy concerns in New York State Assembly District 92 from 2002 to 2012. It found significant increases in the Hispanic population and those with lower incomes, and decreases in the white population and young adults. This affects policy concerns around education funding and the minimum wage. Transportation is also a key issue given the suburban nature of the district. Changes in demographics can make it difficult to address all policy needs.
The economics and health of an aging population en oct 21_finalJacques Fauteux
1) Canada's aging population is growing rapidly, with one in four Canadians expected to be 65 or older by 2031 and the number of those 80 and older doubling by 2040.
2) Seniors are a diverse group, with over half of future seniors projected to be foreign-born or belong to a visible minority.
3) While life expectancy is increasing, healthy life expectancy has remained stable, meaning Canadians are living more years in poorer health.
Exploring Dallas Poverty in Local, Regional, and National ContextsTimothy Bray
This document examines poverty in Dallas, Texas from 2000-2014. It finds that poverty rates increased much more sharply than population growth over this period. The number of children and Hispanic individuals living in poverty grew by 59% and 53% respectively, outpacing the city's overall population increase of 8%. Dallas had one of the highest child poverty and Hispanic poverty rates among major U.S. cities in 2014. The document also analyzes how poverty affects brain development and civic participation, and discusses the changing geographic concentration of poverty within Dallas over time.
Seattle Tacoma Demographic and Economic Snapshotjeffpinkerton
The document provides an economic and demographic overview of the Seattle-Tacoma metropolitan area. Some key points:
- The population of the Seattle metro area is over 3.5 million, making it the 15th largest in the US. King County has the largest population at over 2 million.
- The region has experienced rapid population growth over the past 50 years, outpacing national growth rates.
- The metro area has a racially diverse population, with about one-third non-white. It has one of the largest Asian populations in the US at 12% of the total.
- The median household income in the Seattle metro is $64,085, higher than the national median. Higher incomes
Orchestrating the Future: Navigating Today's Data Workflow Challenges with Ai...Kaxil Naik
Navigating today's data landscape isn't just about managing workflows; it's about strategically propelling your business forward. Apache Airflow has stood out as the benchmark in this arena, driving data orchestration forward since its early days. As we dive into the complexities of our current data-rich environment, where the sheer volume of information and its timely, accurate processing are crucial for AI and ML applications, the role of Airflow has never been more critical.
In my journey as the Senior Engineering Director and a pivotal member of Apache Airflow's Project Management Committee (PMC), I've witnessed Airflow transform data handling, making agility and insight the norm in an ever-evolving digital space. At Astronomer, our collaboration with leading AI & ML teams worldwide has not only tested but also proven Airflow's mettle in delivering data reliably and efficiently—data that now powers not just insights but core business functions.
This session is a deep dive into the essence of Airflow's success. We'll trace its evolution from a budding project to the backbone of data orchestration it is today, constantly adapting to meet the next wave of data challenges, including those brought on by Generative AI. It's this forward-thinking adaptability that keeps Airflow at the forefront of innovation, ready for whatever comes next.
The ever-growing demands of AI and ML applications have ushered in an era where sophisticated data management isn't a luxury—it's a necessity. Airflow's innate flexibility and scalability are what makes it indispensable in managing the intricate workflows of today, especially those involving Large Language Models (LLMs).
This talk isn't just a rundown of Airflow's features; it's about harnessing these capabilities to turn your data workflows into a strategic asset. Together, we'll explore how Airflow remains at the cutting edge of data orchestration, ensuring your organization is not just keeping pace but setting the pace in a data-driven future.
Session in https://budapestdata.hu/2024/04/kaxil-naik-astronomer-io/ | https://dataml24.sessionize.com/session/667627
ViewShift: Hassle-free Dynamic Policy Enforcement for Every Data LakeWalaa Eldin Moustafa
Dynamic policy enforcement is becoming an increasingly important topic in today’s world where data privacy and compliance is a top priority for companies, individuals, and regulators alike. In these slides, we discuss how LinkedIn implements a powerful dynamic policy enforcement engine, called ViewShift, and integrates it within its data lake. We show the query engine architecture and how catalog implementations can automatically route table resolutions to compliance-enforcing SQL views. Such views have a set of very interesting properties: (1) They are auto-generated from declarative data annotations. (2) They respect user-level consent and preferences (3) They are context-aware, encoding a different set of transformations for different use cases (4) They are portable; while the SQL logic is only implemented in one SQL dialect, it is accessible in all engines.
#SQL #Views #Privacy #Compliance #DataLake
4th Modern Marketing Reckoner by MMA Global India & Group M: 60+ experts on W...Social Samosa
The Modern Marketing Reckoner (MMR) is a comprehensive resource packed with POVs from 60+ industry leaders on how AI is transforming the 4 key pillars of marketing – product, place, price and promotions.
Open Source Contributions to Postgres: The Basics POSETTE 2024ElizabethGarrettChri
Postgres is the most advanced open-source database in the world and it's supported by a community, not a single company. So how does this work? How does code actually get into Postgres? I recently had a patch submitted and committed and I want to share what I learned in that process. I’ll give you an overview of Postgres versions and how the underlying project codebase functions. I’ll also show you the process for submitting a patch and getting that tested and committed.
4. 4
Purpose
This document provides information
and data about Daviess County that
can be used to guide local decision-
making activities.
The Data SnapShot showcases a variety
of demographic, economic and labor
market information that local leaders,
community organizations and others can
use to gain a better perspective on
current conditions and opportunities in
their county.
To strengthen the value and usability of
the information, we showcase the data
using a variety of visual tools, such as
charts, graphs and tables. In addition, we
offer key points about the data as a way
of assisting the user with the interpretation
of the information presented.
Finally, short takeaway messages are
offered at the end of each section in order
to highlight some of the more salient
findings.
Introduction
section 01
5. 5
About Daviess County
Introduction
section 01
County Background
Established 1816
County
Seat
Washington
Area 437 sq. mi.
Neighboring
Counties
Dubois, IN
Greene, IN
Knox, IN
Martin, IN
Pike, IN
7. 7
29,820
31,648
32,407
34,096
Population change
Components of Population Change, 2000-
2013
TotalChange 1,859*
Natural Increase 2,687
International Migration 600
Domestic Migration -1,251
The total population is
projected to increase by
5 percent between 2013
and 2020.
Demography
Sources: STATSIndiana, U.S. Census Bureau – 2000 Decennial Census, 2010 Decennial Census, 2013 Estimates, Estimates of the Components of Resident Population Change
section 02
The county’s total population increased by 9 percent
between 2000 and 2013. Natural increase (births minus
deaths over that span of time) was the major contributor to
that expansion, with a gain of almost 2,700 persons.
International migration also increased by 600 individuals,
indicating that the county experienced an influx of new
people from outside the United States. In contrast, domestic
migration (the difference between the number of people
moving into the county versus moving out) resulted in a loss
of 1,251 individuals in Daviess County between 2000 and
2013.
Total population
projections
2000 2010 2013 2020
*Total change in population differs from the sum of the components due to Census estimation techniques. Residuals (not reported here) make up the difference.
8. 8
8.6%
7.7%
6.4%
5.9%
5.8%
6.5%
4.9%
2.7%
1.3%
8.2%
7.2%
6.0%
5.6%
5.7%
6.3%
5.2%
3.2%
2.6%
9 6 3 0 3 6 9
0-9
10-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Percent of Total PopulationAgeCohort
8.2%
8.3%
6.0%
6.7%
6.9%
5.3%
3.5%
2.8%
1.4%
7.5%
7.7%
5.6%
6.4%
6.9%
5.5%
4.2%
3.9%
2.9%
9 6 3 0 3 6 9
0-9
10-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80+
Percent of Total Population
AgeCohort
Population pyramids
Population pyramids are visual representations of the age distribution of the population by
gender.
Approximately 50.7 percent of the population was female
in 2000 (15,115 people) and that percentage remained
about the same in 2013.What did change is the distribution
of people across the various age categories. A larger share
of people shifted into the higher age groupings over the
2000 to 2013 time period.
Demography
Source: U.S. Census Bureau – 2000 Decennial Census and 2013 Annual Population Estimates
section 02
People 50 and over increased from 13.0% to 15.4% for males
and from 16.5% to 17.3% for females between 2000 and
2013. Individuals of prime working age (20–49) dipped from
19.7% to 18.1% for males and from 19.0% to 17.3% for
females. However, residents under 20 years of age remained
constant at 31.7% of the total population.
Male Female
20132000
Male Female
9. 9
White
97%
Other
3%
Black
Asian
Native
Two or More
Races
White
99%
Other
1%
Black
Asian
Native
Two or More
Races
Race
The proportion of non-White residents
in Daviess County doubled between
2000 and 2013.
Every race experienced a numerical increase
over the time period. Of the non-White
races, the Asian (+156) and people ofTwo or
More Race (+161) populations gained the
most. Proportionally, the Asian (+211
percent) and Native (+130 percent) races
gained the most.The White population
increased by 2,069 residents between 2000
and 2013; however, on a proportional basis
this was a small gain.
Demography
Source: U.S. Census Bureau – 2000 Decennial Census and 2013 Annual Population Estimates
section 02
2000
2013
10. 10
Ethnicity
Hispanics are individuals of any
race whose ancestry is from
Mexico, Puerto Rico, Cuba,
Spain, the Dominican Republic
or any other Spanish-speaking
Central or South American
country.
There were 620 Hispanics residing
in Daviess County in 2000.This
figure expanded to 1,480 by 2013, a
138.7 percent increase.
Due to this numeric increase, the
proportion of Hispanics in the
population is now around 5 percent.
Demography
Source: U.S. Census Bureau – 2000 Decennial Census and 2013 Annual Population Estimates
section 02
5%
2%
Hispanics - 2000
Hispanics - 2013
11. 11
No High
School, 28%
High School,
40%
Some
College,
16%
Associate's
Degree, 7%
Bachelor's
Degree or
More, 10%
Educational attainment
DaviessCounty had a 3 percentage point
increase in the number of adults (25 and
older) with an associate’s, bachelor’s or
graduate degree from 2000 to 2013.
The proportion of adults 25 years of age and
older with a high school education or more
improved from 72 percent in 2000 to 77
percent by 2013.Those with only a high
school degree rose slightly from 40 percent
in 2000 to 41 percent in 2013.
Adults with a college education increased
from 17 percent in 2000 to 20 percent in 2013.
This was due to a 1 percentage point increase
in the proportion of residents with associate’s
degrees (7 percent versus 8 percent), while
the proportion of adults with a bachelor's
degree or more increased from 10 percent to
12 percent, a 2 percentage point growth.
.
Demography
Source: U.S. Census Bureau – 2000 Decennial Census and 2013 ACS
section 02
2000
2013
No High
School, 23%
High School,
41%
Some
College,
16%
Associate's
Degree, 8%
Bachelor's
Degree or
More, 12%
12. 12
Takeaways
The population of DaviessCounty is expected to
grow over the next few years, and, if past trends
hold, that increase will be largely due to natural
increase (more births than deaths).
In examining the composition of DaviessCounty’s
population, one finds an aging population in
which the largest age group of workers (50–59) is
nearing retirement age. Additionally, the number
of men and women of prime working age (20–49)
is slowly declining. Noticeably, the number of
persons between 30 and 39 years of age took a
significant dip between 2000 and 2013.The drop
is possibly due to domestic out-migration of
people looking for opportunities out of the
county or in other U.S. locations. On the other
hand, the county experienced growth in the
youngest residents (0–9 years of age) over the
same time period.
Though the racial and ethnic diversity of Daviess
County has doubled since 2000, it remains primarily
white and non-Hispanic.
The educational attainment of adults 25 and over
has improved since 2000, but the percentage of
adults with a high school education (41 percent) or
less (23 percent) remains sizable.Taking time to
assess whether local economic development
opportunities might be impeded by the presence of
a sizable number of adults with a terminal high
school degree or less may be worthy of attention.
While one in five adult residents of the county have
an associate’s, bachelor’s, or higher degree, this
figure is about 12 percent below the figure for the
state of Indiana as a whole.
Daviess County may wish to assess the
workforce skills of workers with a high school
education only. Enhancing their skills so that
they match the needs of local businesses and
industries may be a worthy investment.
Demography
section 02
14. 14
Establishments
Components of Change for Establishments
Total Change (2000-11) 937
Natural Change (births minus
deaths)
910
Net Migration 27
The number of establishments in Daviess
County increased 61 percent from 2000 to
2011.
The rapid growth of establishments was largely due
to natural change.That is, 2,140 establishments
were launched in the county from 2000 to 2011,
while 1,230 closed, resulting in a gain of 910
establishments.There was a small gain of 27
establishments due to net migration.
Economy
Source: National Establishment Time Series (NETS) – 2012 Database
section 03
An establishment is a
physical business location.
Branches, standalones and
headquarters are all
considered types of
establishments.
Definition of Company
Stages
0 1
2 3
4
Self-
employed
2-9
employees
10-99
employees
100-499
employees
500+
employees
Note: The 2011 figures use 2012 data to include all gains and losses over the entire year. Establishment
information was calculated in-house and may differ slightly from publicly available data.
15. 15
Number of establishments by
stage/employment category
Economy
Source: National Establishment Time Series (NETS) – 2012 Database
section 03
2000 2011
Stage Establishments Proportion Establishments Proportion
Stage 0 439 29% 826 33%
Stage 1 866 56% 1,400 57%
Stage 2 212 14% 227 9%
Stage 3 13 1% 15 1%
Stage 4 1 0% -* -
Total 1,531 100% 2,468 100%
Note: The 2011 figures use 2012 data to include all gains and losses over the entire year.
The NETS Database is derived from the Dun & Bradstreet archival national establishment data, a population of known establishments in
the United States that is quality controlled and updated annually. Establishments include both private and public sector business units and
range in size from one employee (i.e., sole-proprietors and self-employed) to several thousand employees.
*ReferenceUSA indicates one Stage 4 firm in 2011, whereas NETS does not show a
Stage 4 firm. Additional information is available on the next slide.
16. 16
Top five employers in 2015
Economy
Source: ReferenceUSA (Infogroup) and
Daviess County Economic Development Corporation
section 03
Establishment Stage
1. DaviessCommunity Hospital Stage 4
2. Perdue Farms, Inc. Stage 4
3. Boyd & Sons, Inc. Stage 3
4. Walmart Supercenter Stage 3
5. Grain Processing Corporation Stage 3
The top five employers produce a mix of
local, regional, and national goods and
services.
DaviessCommunity Hospital inWashington is
the largest establishment-level employer in
DaviessCounty.
DaviessCommunity Hospital andWalmart
provide primarily local and regional services,
while Perdue Farms, Boyd & Sons, andGrain
Processing Corporation are regional and
national businesses.
Information on the top five establishments by employment comes from ReferenceUSA. ReferenceUSA is a library database service provided
by Infogroup, the company that also supplies the list of major employers for Hoosiers by the Numbers. While both NETS and ReferenceUSA
contain establishments, differences in data collection processes result in discrepancies between the two sources. We use NETS for a broad
picture of establishments in the county, while ReferenceUSA is used for studying individual establishments.
Note: URS Corporation, a Stage 3 establishment formerly known as EG&G Technical
Services, is part of the WestGate @ Crane Technology Park. Because the facility is located
just inside Daviess County and is associated with the NSWC – Crane Division, which is
primarilylocated in Martin County, URS Corporation was omitted from the list of top employers.
17. 17
Number of jobs by stage/employment
category
Economy
Source: National Establishment Time Series (NETS) – 2012 Database
section 03
2000 2011
Stage Jobs* Proportion Jobs* Proportion
Stage 0 439 4% 826 6%
Stage 1 3,130 25% 4,241 32%
Stage 2 5,646 46% 5,639 43%
Stage 3 2,161 17% 2,469 19%
Stage 4 1,000 8% - -
Total 12,376 100% 13,175 100%
Note: The 2011 figures use 2012 data to include all gains and losses over the entire year.
*Includes both full-time and part-time jobs
18. 18
Amount of sales (2011 dollars) by
stage/employment category
Economy
Source: National Establishment Time Series (NETS) – 2012 Database
section 03
2000 2011
Stage Sales Proportion Sales Proportion
Stage 0 $52,290,763 3% $57,071,566 5%
Stage 1 $365,497,237 24% $350,145,358 30%
Stage 2 $693,694,925 46% $538,917,093 46%
Stage 3 $275,071,976 18% $230,540,925 19%
Stage 4 $141,141,717 9% - -
Total $1,527,696,619 100% $1,176,674,942 100%
Note: The 2011 figures use 2012 data to include all gains and losses over the entire year.
19. 19
Manufacturing
13.6%
Construction
11.8%
Government
11.6%
Retail Trade
10.8%
Health Care &
Social Assistance
7.3%
All Other
Industries
44.9%
Top five industries in 2013
55.1 percent of jobs are tied to
one of the top five industries in
Daviess County.
Manufacturing is the largest industry
sector (2,225 jobs). Health Care & Social
Assistance is the smallest of the top
industry sectors with 1,197 jobs.
All of the top five industries in Daviess
County gained jobs between 2002 and
2013. Of these, Construction gained the
largest proportion (+36.3 percent),
followed by Health Care & Social
Assistance (+10.5 percent).
Manufacturing experienced the smallest
increase, with a 1.2 percent gain in jobs
over the time period.
Economy
Source: Economic Modeling Specialists International (EMSI) – 2014.3 – QCEW Employees, Non-QCEW Employees, Self-Employed, and Extended Proprietors
section 03
20. 20
Industry distribution and change
NAICS
Code
Description
Jobs
2002
Jobs
2013
Change
(2002-2013)
% Change
(2002-2013)
Average Total
Earnings
2013
11 Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 1,279 950 -329 -26% $33,096
21 Mining, Quarrying, & Oil & Gas Extraction 535 623 88 16% $36,830
22 Utilities 56 42 -14 -25% $83,542
23 Construction 1,415 1,929 514 36% $41,931
31-33 Manufacturing 2,198 2,225 27 1% $41,579
42 Wholesale Trade 458 410 -48 -10% $52,332
44-45 Retail Trade 1,673 1,766 93 6% $31,067
48-49 Transportation & Warehousing 835 1,057 222 27% $37,747
51 Information 138 91 -47 -34% $42,424
52 Finance & Insurance 402 489 87 22% $42,248
53 Real Estate & Rental & Leasing 292 440 148 51% $22,212
54 Professional, Scientific & Technical Services 316 470 154 49% $48,503
55 Management of Companies and Enterprises <10 19 - - $84,274
56 Administrative & Waste Management 253 539 286 113% $13,349
61 Educational Services (Private) 247 133 -114 -46% $18,888
62 Health Care & Social Assistance 1,083 1,197 114 11% $32,274
71 Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 65 126 61 94% $9,562
72 Accommodation and Food Services 814 881 67 8% $12,504
81 Other Services (except Public Administration) 923 1,055 132 14% $19,048
90 Government 1,786 1,888 102 6% $48,167
99 Unclassified Industry 0 0 0 0% $0
All Total 14,769 16,331 1,562 11% $35,394
Economy
Source: Economic Modeling Specialists International (EMSI) – 2014.3 – QCEW Employees, Non-QCEW Employees, Self-Employed, and Extended Proprietors
section 03Note: Average total earnings include wages, salaries, supplements and earnings from
Industries and occupations with a value of <10 have insufficient data for change and earnings calculations.
21. 21
Industry distribution and change
The largest percentage gains in
employment in Daviess County
occurred in:
Administrative andWaste
Management Services (+113.0
percent)
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
(+93.8 percent)
The largest percentage losses in
employment occurred in:
Educational Services, private (-46.2
percent)
Information (-34.1 percent)
Economy
Source: Economic Modeling Specialists International (EMSI) – 2014.3 – QCEW Employees, Non-QCEW Employees, Self-Employed, and Extended Proprietors
section 03
Employment Increase Employment Decrease
Industries with the largest gains and losses
in employment numbers between 2002 &
2013:
Construction
(+514)
Administrative &
Waste Management
(+286)
Transportation &
Warehousing
(+222)
Agriculture &
Forestry
(-329)
Educational Services
(-114)
22. 22
Sales & Related
11.3%
Transportation &
Material Moving
10.8%
Management
10.3%
Construction &
Extraction
10.1%
Production
9.9%
All Other
Occupations
47.7%
Top five occupations in 2013
The top five occupations in
Daviess County represent 52.3
percent of all jobs.
Sales & Related (1,838 jobs) is the top
occupation classification in DaviessCounty,
followed byTransportation and Material
Moving (1,769 jobs). Production, the fifth
largest occupation in the county, employs
over 1,600 individuals.
All five top occupations in DaviessCounty,
except Management (-3.4 percent), had an
increase in jobs between 2002 and 2013.
Construction & Extraction occupations
gained the largest proportion (+25.1
percent), while Production occupations
gained the least (+5.5 percent) over this
time period.
Economy
Source: Economic Modeling Specialists International (EMSI) – 2014.3 – QCEW Employees, Non-QCEW Employees, Self-Employed, and Extended Proprietors
section 03
23. 23
SOC Description
Jobs
2002
Jobs
2013
Change
(2002-2013)
% Change
(2002-2013)
Hourly
Earnings 2013
11 Management 1,739 1,675 -64 -4% $19.49
13 Business & Financial Operations 368 482 114 31% $23.58
15 Computer & Mathematical 74 83 9 12% $23.98
17 Architecture & Engineering 137 177 40 29% $28.99
19 Life, Physical & Social Science 52 61 9 17% $27.95
21 Community & Social Service 121 174 53 44% $16.03
23 Legal 41 43 2 5% $26.47
25 Education, Training & Library 668 572 -96 -14% $16.44
27 Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media 205 258 53 26% $16.66
29 Health Care Practitioners & Technical 610 767 157 26% $27.56
31 Health Care Support 345 397 52 15% $10.99
33 Protective Service 120 129 9 8% $17.10
35 Food Preparation & Serving Related 871 904 33 4% $8.72
37 Building & Grounds Cleaning Maintenance 445 638 193 43% $9.20
39 Personal Care & Service 576 563 -13 -2% $8.55
41 Sales & Related 1,616 1,838 222 14% $14.26
43 Office & Administrative Support 1,337 1,491 154 12% $13.74
45 Farming, Fishing & Forestry 170 141 -29 -17% $13.10
47 Construction & Extraction 1,321 1,653 332 25% $17.68
49 Installation, Maintenance & Repair 641 731 90 14% $16.79
51 Production 1,527 1,611 84 6% $13.54
53 Transportation & Material Moving 1,622 1,769 147 9% $13.93
55 Military 98 103 5 5% $18.46
99 Unclassified 66 70 4 6% $11.70
All Total 14,769 16,331 1,562 11% $15.67
Occupation distribution and change
Economy
Source: Economic Modeling Specialists International (EMSI) – 2014.3 – QCEW Employees, Non-QCEW Employees, Self-Employed, and Extended Proprietors
section 03
Note: Industries and occupations with a value of <10 have insufficient data for change and earnings calculations.
24. 24
Occupation distribution and change
Economy
Source: Economic Modeling Specialists International (EMSI) – 2014.3 – QCEW Employees, Non-QCEW Employees, Self-Employed, and Extended Proprietors
section 03
The largest percentage gains in
employment in Daviess County
occurred in:
Community and Social Service (+43.8
percent)
Building andGrounds Cleaning and
Maintenance (+43.4 percent)
The largest percentage loss in
employment occurred in:
Farming, Fishing and Forestry
(-17.1 percent)
Education,Training and Library
(-14.4 percent)
Occupations with the largest gains and
losses in employment numbers between
2002 & 2013:
Construction &
Extraction
(+332)
Sales & Related
(+222)
Education,Training
& Library
(-96)
Management
(-64)
Employment Increase Employment Decrease
25. 25
Income and poverty
2000 2006 2013
Total Population in
Poverty
12.4% 14.5% 13.9%
Minors (up to age 17)
in Poverty
19.6% 22.5% 23.5%
Real Median Household
Income (2013)*
$49,187 $44,854 $45,578
Real Per Capita Income
(2013)*
$31,490 $32,898 $37,261
The median household income
in Daviess County dipped by
$3,600 between 2000 and 2013
in real dollars (that is, adjusted
for inflation), while average
income per person rose by
$5,800 in real dollars over the
same time period.
The total population in poverty and
the number of minors in poverty
increased slightly between 2000 and
2013. However, the proportion of the
population in poverty was already
high, and, by 2013, nearly one in four
minors was living in poverty.
Economy
Source: U.S. Census Bureau – Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates (SAIPE) and U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis – Regional Personal Income Summary
section 03
*Real median household income is the middle income value in the county. Half of the county’s households fall
above this line and half below. Real per capita personal income is the average income per person in the county.
26. 26
0
5
10
15
20
25
28,000
32,000
36,000
40,000
44,000
48,000
PopulationinPoverty(percent)
RealIncome(2013dollars)
Median Household
Income
Minors in Poverty
All Ages in Poverty
Per Capita
Income
Income and poverty
Median household income in Daviess County fluctuated between 2000 and 2009, but it is now
improving. Per capita income has been gradually increasing since 2002. Poverty rates for adults and
minors have stabilized over the past five years, although the rates remain relatively high for minors
under 18 years of age.
Economy
Source: U.S. Census Bureau – Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates (SAIPE) and U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis – Regional Personal Income Summary
section 03
27. 27
Takeaways
Growth in the number of establishments in
Daviess County occurred mainly in businesses
having fewer than 10 employees (the self-
employed and Stage 1 enterprises),
components of the local economy that are
often overlooked by local leaders.
DaviessCounty might consider focusing on
economic development efforts that seek to
strengthen high-growth Stage 1 and 2
establishments, since they employ several people
and capture sizable sales, although these sales have
suffered in recent years.
Real median household income has gradually
decreased and poverty has increased in Daviess
County since 2000.While poverty rates for minors
and the overall population have stabilized since
2010, they remain higher than in 2000. In fact, a
sizable proportion of minors (one in four) were
living in poverty in 2013.
The fluctuation and gradual decline in real median
income experienced between 2000 and 2013 may be
tied to employment changes in various industries in
the county during that time period. Between 2002
and 2013, agriculture and education-related
industries and occupations in DaviessCounty
suffered declines, while jobs in construction and local
services increased. While growth was felt by both low
and high paying industries, positive shifts were
concentrated in lower paying occupations, primarily
among those paying less than $20 per hour.
No doubt, the ability of DaviessCounty to capture
high paying jobs will depend on the availability of a
well-trained and educated workforce, something
that may be challenging in light of the smaller
percentage of adults in the county with an
associate’s degree or higher. Ensuring that a skilled
workforce is available to support key industries in the
county will be important to the economic stability of
the county.
Economy
section 03
29. 29
Labor force and unemployment
2002 2013
Labor Force 14,072 14,985
Unemployment
Rate
4.3% 5.5%
The labor force in Daviess County
increased by 6.5 percent between 2002
and 2013.
On the other hand, the increase in the
unemployment rate is likely due to a rise in the
number of individuals who are either officially
unemployed or who have given up looking for
a job.
Labor market
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics – Local Area Unemployment Statistics (2013 Annual Data Release)
section 04
31. 31
Commuteshed
A county’s commuteshed is the
geographic area to which its resident
labor force travels to work.
Forty-nine percent of employed residents in
DaviessCounty commute to jobs located
outside of the county. Knox County is the
biggest destination for residents who work
outside of DaviessCounty.
Twenty-one percent of out-commuters work
in counties adjacent to DaviessCounty.
However, the third, fourth and fifth largest
work destinations outside of Daviess County
are the Indianapolis (Marion County),
Evansville (VanderburghCounty), andTerre
Haute (Vigo County) metropolitan areas,
respectively.
Labor market
Source: U.S. Census Bureau – Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD)
section 04
6,054
Out-Commuters
6,388
Same Work/
Home
Commuters Proportion
Knox, IN 935 7.5%
Dubois, IN 874 7.0%
Marion, IN 475 3.8%
Vanderburgh, IN 437 3.5%
Vigo, IN 431 3.5%
32. 32
Commuteshed in 2011
Labor market
section 04
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, OTM, LEHD, PCRD
Seventy percent of Daviess
County’s working residents are
employed either in Daviess,
Dubois, Knox or Marion Counties.
Another 5 percent commute to
Vanderburgh County. An
additional 5 percent travel to jobs
in Martin orVigo Counties.
Collectively, these seven counties
represent 80 percent of the
commuteshed for Daviess
County.
33. 33
Laborshed
Commuters Proportion
Martin, IN 636 5.7%
Knox, IN 631 5.7%
Greene, IN 270 2.4%
Pike, IN 255 2.3%
Dubois, IN 247 2.2%
Labor market
Source: U.S. Census Bureau – Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD)
section 04
4,765
In-Commuters
6,388
Same Work/
Home
A county’s laborshed is the
geographic area from which it draws
employees.
Forty-two percent of individuals working in
DaviessCounty commute from another
county.
Eighteen percent of in-commuters reside
in counties adjacent to DaviessCounty, and
all five of the top counties in the laborshed
are adjacent counties. Of these counties,
Martin County is the largest source of labor
outside of DaviessCounty, while Dubois
County is the smallest.
34. 34
Laborshed in 2011
Labor market
section 04
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, OTM, LEHD, PCRD
The bulk (70 percent) of Daviess
County’s workforce is drawn
from Daviess, Knox or Martin
Counties in Indiana. Another 5
percent is drawn from Dubois,
Greene and Pike Counties.An
additional 5 percent reside in
Lawrence, Marion and
VanderburghCounties in Indiana.
Combined, the nine counties
represent 80 percent of Daviess
County’s laborshed.
35. 35
Workforce inflow and outflow in 2011
Labor market
section 04
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, OTM, LEHD, PCRD
Daviess County has more laborers
traveling out of the county for work than
into the county for work.
Net commuting is negative, with a loss of 1,289
commuters.The resulting situation is that for
every 100 employed residents, DaviessCounty
has 90 jobs.
Count
Proportio
n
Employed in Daviess
County
11,153 100%
Both employed and
living in the county
6,388 57%
Employed in the county
but living outside
4,765 43%
Living in Daviess
County
12,442 100%
Both living and
employed in the county
6,388 51%
Living in the county but
employed outside
6,054 49%
4,765 6,054
6,388
36. 36
Takeaways
The Great Recession that impacted the U.S.
economy between 2007 and 2009 took a toll on
the DaviessCounty unemployment rate. While the
rate was quite low in 2000, it more than doubled
to over 6 percent by 2010. Recent figures make
clear that the unemployment rate has improved
significantly since 2010.
Along with the increase in the population over the
past decade or more, the county’s labor force has
grown since 2002. Despite growth in the number
of residents employed or looking for a job, the
unemployment rate is also higher.This may be a
natural increase due to population growth. It is
also possible that an increasing number of
unemployed individuals who were discouraged
workers previously have reentered the labor
market and begun looking for a job.
Approximately one-half of DaviessCounty
residents in the workforce are gainfully employed
outside of the county.This represents a
tremendous loss of human talent that is
unavailable to contribute to the social and
economic vitality of the county. It may be
worthwhile for local leaders and industries to
determine the human capital attributes of
workers who commute to jobs outside the
county. By so doing, they could be positioned to
determine how best to reduce the leakage of
educated and skilled workers to surrounding
counties. Of course, this will require expansion in
the number of good paying jobs that will help
keep these workers in DaviessCounty.
The laborshed and commuteshed data
offer solid evidence of the value of
pursuing economic and workforce
development on a regional (multi-county)
basis.
Labor market
section 04
37. 37
Notes
LAUS (Local Area Unemployment Statistics):
LAUS is a U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) program that
provides monthly and annual labor force, employment, and
unemployment data by place of residence at various geographic
levels. LAUS utilizes statistical models to estimate data values
based on household surveys and employer reports. These
estimates are updated annually. Annual county-level LAUS
estimates do not include seasonal adjustments.
LEHD (Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics):
LEHD is a partnership between U.S. Census Bureau and State
Department of Workforce Development (DWD) to provide labor
market and journey to work data at various geographic levels.
LEHD uses Unemployment Insurance earnings data and
Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages from DWDs and
census administrative records related to individuals and
businesses.
NETS (National EstablishmentTime Series):
NETS is an establishment-level database, not a company-level
database. This means that each entry is a different physical
location, and company-level information must be created by
adding the separate establishment components.
OTM (On the Map):
OTM, a product of LEHD program, is used in the county
snapshot report to develop commuting patterns for a
geography from two perspectives: place of residence and place
of work. At the highly detailed level of census blocks, some of
the data are synthetic to maintain confidentiality of the
worker. However, for larger regions mapped at the county
level, the commuteshed and laborshed data are fairly
reasonable.
OTM includes jobs for a worker employed in the reference as
well as previous quarter. Hence, job counts are based on two
consecutive quarters (six months) measured at the “beginning
of a quarter.” OTM data can differ from commuting patterns
developed from state annual income tax returns, which asks a
question about “county of residence” and “county of work” on
January 1 of the tax-year. OTM can also differ from American
Community Survey data, which is based on a sample survey of
the resident population.
SAIPE (SmallArea Income and Poverty Estimates):
SAIPE is a U.S. Census Bureau program that provides annual
data estimates of income and poverty statistics at various
geographic levels. The estimates are used in the administration
of federal and state assistance programs. SAIPE utilizes
statistical models to estimate data from sample surveys,
census enumerations, and administrative records.
38. 38
Report Contributors
This report was prepared by the Purdue Center for Regional Development in partnership with
Purdue University Extension.
Data Analysis
Indraneel Kumar, Ph.D.
Ayoung Kim
Report Authors
Elizabeth Dobis
Bo Beaulieu, Ph.D.
Report Design
Tyler Wright
It is the policy of the Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service that all persons have equal opportunity and access to its
educational programs, services, activities, and facilities without regard to race, religion, color, sex, age, national origin or ancestry,
marital status, parental status, sexual orientation, disability or status as a veteran. Purdue University is an Affirmative Action institution.
This material may be available in alternative formats.
39. FOR MORE
INFORMATION
Purdue Center for Regional Development
(PCRD) . . .
seeks to pioneer new ideas and strategies that contribute
to regional collaboration, innovation and prosperity.
Purdue Extension Community Development
(CD) . . .
works to strengthen the capacity of local leaders, residents
and organizations to work together to develop and sustain
strong, vibrant communities.
Please contact
Cindy Barber
Purdue Extension -- DaviessCounty
Associate Community Development
Educator
812-254-1060, extension 279
cabarber@purdue.edu
OR
Editor's Notes
ReferenceUSA indicates that Daviess Community Hospital is the Stage 4 establishment in Daviess County with 1,200 employees.
In 2000, the Stage 4 firm indicated by NETS is a branch of Perdue Farms, Inc that handled processed turkey. However, this establishment is shown to have closed in 2001. NETS has one other Perdue establishment, a poultry slaughtering and processing location with 60 employees in 2011. ReferenceUSA lists four Perdue Foods locations in Daviess County, with a maximum of 170 employees in total across the locations, none of which is listed as poultry processing. However, IN DWD lists Perdue as the second largest employer in the county, which does not match with the data from either NETS or ReferenceUSA.