Evaluation of virtual
Title of presentation classroom technology:
Name of presenter student engagement and
implications for
Title of presenter
satisfaction./ Division
School / Faculty
xx Month 201x
Liz Pascoe - Stream Coordinator, Masters in Cancer Nursing
Austin Clinical School
Sharon Karasmanis, Faculty Librarian (Health Sciences)
6 December 2013
latrobe.edu.au

CRICOS Provider 00115M
The Students:
• Masters of Nursing (Breast Care) and
Masters of Nursing (Cancer/Palliative Care)
• Postgraduate return-to-study mature age
students
• Distance education!

La Trobe University

2
The Challenge!
• To deliver educational instruction in real time

• To help students to transfer existing skill base
to the academic research environment
• To teach students how to conduct systematic
searches of the health databases to locate high
quality evidence!

La Trobe University

3
The Tool - Blackboard Collaborate!
• Virtual classroom

• Educational learning technology
• Educational instruction in real time

• Excellent for remote/distance students
• Session recordings available

• Easy to connect!
• Example on next slide
La Trobe University

4
La Trobe University

5
The Evaluation
• Evaluate the efficacy of BC as learning medium

• Online survey contained Likert style responses,
quantitative and qualitative feedback
• Three sections:
• Student experience in using Collaborate

• Student perception of impact on learning
• Student attitude towards research
La Trobe University

6
What did we learn?
• Quantitative:
• BC: ease of use 94% rated OK to very easy
• Ratings from Important to Most Important
• Real-time engagement - 78%
• Session content - 83%
• Social interaction – 61%

La Trobe University

7
What did we learn?
• Qualitative comments:
• ‘Keep in touch with what other students were
doing’. ‘Evaluate how others were travelling’
• ‘Recordings helped to alleviate feelings of isolation
… distance education learner’

• ‘It gets so lonely being out here in the desert
[Broken Hill] … so isolated’. ‘Being able to connect’
• ‘Used the session recordings as a sound base for
assignments – would have struggled without
them’. ‘Helped me refocus …if I was bogged down’
La Trobe University

8
Student attitudes towards research
• Confidence in library research skills:
• Conducting database searches for health
literature: 94%
• Knowing how to reference a source: 88%
• Revising the search strategy: Somewhat
Difficult to Somewhat Easy

• Finding full text articles: 100%
La Trobe University

9
In Conclusion …
• BC enabled delivery of complex educational
activities in real time
• Recordings scaffold the session content
• Facilitates the key androgogical principle of
being self-directed
• Enables students to
connect!

La Trobe University

10
Thank you

• Connect
• Confidence
• Learn
latrobe.edu.au

CRICOS Provider 00115M

Evaluation of virtual classroom technology - Blackboard Collaborate

  • 1.
    Evaluation of virtual Titleof presentation classroom technology: Name of presenter student engagement and implications for Title of presenter satisfaction./ Division School / Faculty xx Month 201x Liz Pascoe - Stream Coordinator, Masters in Cancer Nursing Austin Clinical School Sharon Karasmanis, Faculty Librarian (Health Sciences) 6 December 2013 latrobe.edu.au CRICOS Provider 00115M
  • 2.
    The Students: • Mastersof Nursing (Breast Care) and Masters of Nursing (Cancer/Palliative Care) • Postgraduate return-to-study mature age students • Distance education! La Trobe University 2
  • 3.
    The Challenge! • Todeliver educational instruction in real time • To help students to transfer existing skill base to the academic research environment • To teach students how to conduct systematic searches of the health databases to locate high quality evidence! La Trobe University 3
  • 4.
    The Tool -Blackboard Collaborate! • Virtual classroom • Educational learning technology • Educational instruction in real time • Excellent for remote/distance students • Session recordings available • Easy to connect! • Example on next slide La Trobe University 4
  • 5.
  • 6.
    The Evaluation • Evaluatethe efficacy of BC as learning medium • Online survey contained Likert style responses, quantitative and qualitative feedback • Three sections: • Student experience in using Collaborate • Student perception of impact on learning • Student attitude towards research La Trobe University 6
  • 7.
    What did welearn? • Quantitative: • BC: ease of use 94% rated OK to very easy • Ratings from Important to Most Important • Real-time engagement - 78% • Session content - 83% • Social interaction – 61% La Trobe University 7
  • 8.
    What did welearn? • Qualitative comments: • ‘Keep in touch with what other students were doing’. ‘Evaluate how others were travelling’ • ‘Recordings helped to alleviate feelings of isolation … distance education learner’ • ‘It gets so lonely being out here in the desert [Broken Hill] … so isolated’. ‘Being able to connect’ • ‘Used the session recordings as a sound base for assignments – would have struggled without them’. ‘Helped me refocus …if I was bogged down’ La Trobe University 8
  • 9.
    Student attitudes towardsresearch • Confidence in library research skills: • Conducting database searches for health literature: 94% • Knowing how to reference a source: 88% • Revising the search strategy: Somewhat Difficult to Somewhat Easy • Finding full text articles: 100% La Trobe University 9
  • 10.
    In Conclusion … •BC enabled delivery of complex educational activities in real time • Recordings scaffold the session content • Facilitates the key androgogical principle of being self-directed • Enables students to connect! La Trobe University 10
  • 11.
    Thank you • Connect •Confidence • Learn latrobe.edu.au CRICOS Provider 00115M