Peter Gray and Dave Slater of Royal Bolton Hospital shown at the 2nd Lean Healthcare Forum on 6th June 2006 ran by the Lean Enterprise Academy
www.leanuk.org
Application of Lean thinking to laboratory service improvement; 5S; seven wastes, working in cells, process mapping, single piece flow, reducing turnaround time
Three wonderful researchers gathered together a century of work on which hiring practices are related to performance in the job. Problem is, they wrote a 75 page paper about it, and that's a barrier. I've summarized their paper into less than 30 slides so you can make the case for science-based hiring in your company.
Tester Motivation - the results of a 600 tester survey with Stuart ReidTEST Huddle
View the webinar here: http://testhuddle.com/forums/topic/tester-motivation-the-results-of-a-600-tester-survey/
Stuart Reid shares the results of a motivation survey of over 600 testers. The study separated out the survey respondents into six distinct testing roles: Developer/Tester, Test Analyst, Test Lead, Test Manager, Test Consultant and Head of Testing. The factors and job characteristics that affect testers in each of the roles are also taken into account and they are compared and contrasted, as are the range of activities they perform.
It is clear from the results that different roles are best motivated by different factors and job characteristics which Stuart will discuss.
Key Takeaways from the Survey:
Learn to to increase your team’s productivity by learning a smarter way of motivating your testers
Identify areas that will make you more motivated in your job as a tester or test manager
Learn how testers in different roles are motivated by quite different factors
For a second chance to view the webinar, or if you want to discuss the content, you can join the discussion on TESTHuddle.com.
Peter Gray and Dave Slater of Royal Bolton Hospital shown at the 2nd Lean Healthcare Forum on 6th June 2006 ran by the Lean Enterprise Academy
www.leanuk.org
Application of Lean thinking to laboratory service improvement; 5S; seven wastes, working in cells, process mapping, single piece flow, reducing turnaround time
Three wonderful researchers gathered together a century of work on which hiring practices are related to performance in the job. Problem is, they wrote a 75 page paper about it, and that's a barrier. I've summarized their paper into less than 30 slides so you can make the case for science-based hiring in your company.
Tester Motivation - the results of a 600 tester survey with Stuart ReidTEST Huddle
View the webinar here: http://testhuddle.com/forums/topic/tester-motivation-the-results-of-a-600-tester-survey/
Stuart Reid shares the results of a motivation survey of over 600 testers. The study separated out the survey respondents into six distinct testing roles: Developer/Tester, Test Analyst, Test Lead, Test Manager, Test Consultant and Head of Testing. The factors and job characteristics that affect testers in each of the roles are also taken into account and they are compared and contrasted, as are the range of activities they perform.
It is clear from the results that different roles are best motivated by different factors and job characteristics which Stuart will discuss.
Key Takeaways from the Survey:
Learn to to increase your team’s productivity by learning a smarter way of motivating your testers
Identify areas that will make you more motivated in your job as a tester or test manager
Learn how testers in different roles are motivated by quite different factors
For a second chance to view the webinar, or if you want to discuss the content, you can join the discussion on TESTHuddle.com.
Every year, software companies spend a huge amount of time and effort estimating large projects, and still end up regularly missing the mark - often by huge amounts. What the heck is going on? With all of the planning poker, and PI planning, and #noestimates, why isn't this figured out yet?
In this talk, we'll dive into probability theory and psychology to discover some of the common underlying causes for a lack of predictability. Once we understand why the world is so uncertain, we'll talk about how we can live with our estimation failures, while still thrilling our customers and maintaining enough predictability to succeed as an organization.
Assignment 2 1 of 32Exercise 2-1 Testing Herzbergs Job .docxsherni1
Assignment 2 1 of 32
Exercise 2-1: Testing Herzberg's Job Enrichment Theory
This exercise is a reanalysis of Exercise 1-2: A Motivated Time at Work (Workbook 1). It is designed to give you a “hands on” feel for Herzberg's theory by having you apply it to your own work experiences.
Your objective is to determine the degree to which the reasons that contributed to your being highly motivated correspond to Herzberg's motivator/hygiene factors. If Herzberg's theory is correct, then as an aggregate the persons doing Exercise 1-2 should have given more weight to motivator than to hygiene factors in explaining the “motivated time at work.”
Keep in mind that your own results may not fit the theory. Social scientists almost always study aggregate data in order to smooth out the idiosyncrasies of individual responses.
Step 1: Match Reasons to Herzberg’s Factors
For each reason identified in Exercise 1-2, see if you can place it alongside one of Herzberg's lists of motivator/hygiene factors. Do this on the next page. Since it is unlikely that the terms you used in doing Exercise 1-2 correspond exactly with Herzberg's terminology, you will probably have to do some translating. If one of the reasons that you listed in Exercise 1-2 doesn't seem to fit Herzberg's terms, ignore it.
When you enter the reasons from Exercise 1-2 on the lists on the next page, put in the number of the reason as it was listed in 1-2 and the weight assigned to it (e.g., #3(4) represents factor #3 which was given a weight of 4). In this way, the instructor can determine if you are classifying your Exercise 1-2 reasons correctly into Herzberg's motivator/hygiene categories.
Step 2: Total the Factors
Total the number of motivator and hygiene factors and enter the totals in the spaces provided.
Step 3: Total the Weights of the Factors
Add the weights for the motivator and hygiene factors and put the totals in the spaces provided.
Herzberg’s Motivator factors
Factor Number(S) and Weight(S) from Exercise 1-2
Achievement
Recognition
Interesting Work
Responsibility
Challenge
Professional Growth
Total Number of Factors =
Total Number of Factors =Total of Weights =
Hygiene Factors
Factor Number(S) and Weight(S) from Exercise 1-2
Supervision
Working Conditions
Interpersonal Relations
Money, Extrinsic Rewards
Company Policy
Status
Security
Total Number of Factors =
Total of Weights =
Exercise 2-2: The Job Diagnostic Survey
The following survey (modified from Hackman & Oldham, 1980) will be used in conjunction with the main ideas of this workbook. Your answers will be used to compute a score evaluating the quality of the design of the job you are presently holding. Later, you will see how your score matches a number of jobs from the private and public sectors.
As you fill out this survey, remember the primary purpose for doing so is to enhance your own learning. The more honestly you respond to the questions, the more valuable will be your learning experience.
Part 1 ...
A step-by-step guide to best practice selection methodology. This presentation, given in the late 90's across New Zealand, is still relevant nearly 20 years on.
Delve into our students' project on employee retention, highlighting data-driven strategies to enhance workforce stability. Explore how analytics can predict turnover, identify key retention drivers, and improve employee engagement. Gain insights into HR analytics, predictive modeling, and innovative approaches to employee retention. To learn more, do check out https://bostoninstituteofanalytics.org/data-science-and-artificial-intelligence/
I run the Red beads simulation as the basis for describing how any business is a system and the need to understand how it really works to manage it effectively.
Transforming End of Life Care in Acute Hospitals PM Workshop 3: Vital Signs ‘...NHS Improving Quality
Transforming End of Life Care in Acute Hospitals PM Workshop 3: Vital Signs ‘Making Measurement Better’ How well things are going and how to make it better’ presented by Sean Manning, NHS England
Every year, software companies spend a huge amount of time and effort estimating large projects, and still end up regularly missing the mark - often by huge amounts. What the heck is going on? With all of the planning poker, and PI planning, and #noestimates, why isn't this figured out yet?
In this talk, we'll dive into probability theory and psychology to discover some of the common underlying causes for a lack of predictability. Once we understand why the world is so uncertain, we'll talk about how we can live with our estimation failures, while still thrilling our customers and maintaining enough predictability to succeed as an organization.
Assignment 2 1 of 32Exercise 2-1 Testing Herzbergs Job .docxsherni1
Assignment 2 1 of 32
Exercise 2-1: Testing Herzberg's Job Enrichment Theory
This exercise is a reanalysis of Exercise 1-2: A Motivated Time at Work (Workbook 1). It is designed to give you a “hands on” feel for Herzberg's theory by having you apply it to your own work experiences.
Your objective is to determine the degree to which the reasons that contributed to your being highly motivated correspond to Herzberg's motivator/hygiene factors. If Herzberg's theory is correct, then as an aggregate the persons doing Exercise 1-2 should have given more weight to motivator than to hygiene factors in explaining the “motivated time at work.”
Keep in mind that your own results may not fit the theory. Social scientists almost always study aggregate data in order to smooth out the idiosyncrasies of individual responses.
Step 1: Match Reasons to Herzberg’s Factors
For each reason identified in Exercise 1-2, see if you can place it alongside one of Herzberg's lists of motivator/hygiene factors. Do this on the next page. Since it is unlikely that the terms you used in doing Exercise 1-2 correspond exactly with Herzberg's terminology, you will probably have to do some translating. If one of the reasons that you listed in Exercise 1-2 doesn't seem to fit Herzberg's terms, ignore it.
When you enter the reasons from Exercise 1-2 on the lists on the next page, put in the number of the reason as it was listed in 1-2 and the weight assigned to it (e.g., #3(4) represents factor #3 which was given a weight of 4). In this way, the instructor can determine if you are classifying your Exercise 1-2 reasons correctly into Herzberg's motivator/hygiene categories.
Step 2: Total the Factors
Total the number of motivator and hygiene factors and enter the totals in the spaces provided.
Step 3: Total the Weights of the Factors
Add the weights for the motivator and hygiene factors and put the totals in the spaces provided.
Herzberg’s Motivator factors
Factor Number(S) and Weight(S) from Exercise 1-2
Achievement
Recognition
Interesting Work
Responsibility
Challenge
Professional Growth
Total Number of Factors =
Total Number of Factors =Total of Weights =
Hygiene Factors
Factor Number(S) and Weight(S) from Exercise 1-2
Supervision
Working Conditions
Interpersonal Relations
Money, Extrinsic Rewards
Company Policy
Status
Security
Total Number of Factors =
Total of Weights =
Exercise 2-2: The Job Diagnostic Survey
The following survey (modified from Hackman & Oldham, 1980) will be used in conjunction with the main ideas of this workbook. Your answers will be used to compute a score evaluating the quality of the design of the job you are presently holding. Later, you will see how your score matches a number of jobs from the private and public sectors.
As you fill out this survey, remember the primary purpose for doing so is to enhance your own learning. The more honestly you respond to the questions, the more valuable will be your learning experience.
Part 1 ...
A step-by-step guide to best practice selection methodology. This presentation, given in the late 90's across New Zealand, is still relevant nearly 20 years on.
Delve into our students' project on employee retention, highlighting data-driven strategies to enhance workforce stability. Explore how analytics can predict turnover, identify key retention drivers, and improve employee engagement. Gain insights into HR analytics, predictive modeling, and innovative approaches to employee retention. To learn more, do check out https://bostoninstituteofanalytics.org/data-science-and-artificial-intelligence/
I run the Red beads simulation as the basis for describing how any business is a system and the need to understand how it really works to manage it effectively.
Transforming End of Life Care in Acute Hospitals PM Workshop 3: Vital Signs ‘...NHS Improving Quality
Transforming End of Life Care in Acute Hospitals PM Workshop 3: Vital Signs ‘Making Measurement Better’ How well things are going and how to make it better’ presented by Sean Manning, NHS England
"Methodology for Assessment of Linked Data Quality: A Framework" at Workshop on Linked Data Quality
Paper: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2265375/LDQ/ldq2014_submission_3.pdf
"Using Linked Data to Evaluate the Impact of Research and Development in Europe: A Structural Equation Model" presented at ISWC 2013 (http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-41338-4_16)
Presentation for I-Semantics 2013 conference on "User-driven Quality Evaluation of DBpedia", link to full paper: http://svn.aksw.org/papers/2013/ISemantics_DBpediaDQ/public.pdf.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
CrowdED: Guideline for optimal Crowdsourcing Experimental Design
1. CrowdED: Guideline for
Optimal Crowdsourcing
Amrapali Zaveri, Pedro Hernandez Serrano, Manisha
Desai, Michel Dumontier
HumL@WWW2018 @AmrapaliZ 24 April, 20181
2. Crowdsourcing Tasks
❖ Tasks based on human skills
not yet replicable by machines
❖ Highly parallelizable tasks
❖ Every human (worker) must
be provided with a monetary
reward for an answer
❖ Consolidated answers solve
scientific problems
!2
8. Related Studies
!8
Adaptive Model
Active Learning
KB Test Questions
Self Assessment
Cost-Time
&
Cost-Quality
Optimization
CrowdED
CrowdED offers a two-staged statistical model to estimate a-priori worker
and task assignment to achieve maximum accuracy.
9. Stage 1:
• Train all
workers
• On a proportion
of tasks
• Identify best
workers &
• Hard tasks
2 Stages
!9
!
Stage 2:
• Assign best
workers to
• Hard tasks
• Remaining tasks
• Calculate
Overall
Accuracy
!
11. Assign Tasks to Workers
!
Stage 1
Easy Hard
Good Poor
Workers
Tasks
Task
Label
Truth
1 1 hard_task age
1 2 hard_task age
1 3 hard_task age
1 4 easy_task age
1 5 easy_task age
Simulate
Odd no.
Proportion
of tasks to train
!11
Worker
Label
Truth
1 1 good_worker age
2 1 poor_worker age
3 1 good_worker age
4 1 good_worker age
5 1 poor_worker age
Workerview
Taskview
12. Calculate Worker Accuracy
& Task Difficulty
!12
Task
Label
Truth
Task
Difficulty
1 1 hard_task age 0.54
1 2 hard_task age 0.42
1 3 hard_task age 0.45
1 4 easy_task age 0.80
1 5 easy_task age 0.70
Worker
Label
Truth
Worker
Accuracy
1 1 good_worker age 0.75
2 1 poor_worker age 0.58
3 1 good_worker age 0.78
4 1 good_worker age 0.95
5 1 poor_worker age 0.54
Workerview
Taskview
13. Simulate Worker Answer
!13
Task
Label
Truth
Task
Difficulty
Worker
Answer
1 1 hard_task age 0.54 age
1 2 hard_task age 0.42 tissue
1 3 hard_task age 0.45 disease
1 4 easy_task age 0.80 age
1 5 easy_task age 0.70 age
Worker
Label
Truth
Worker
Accuracy
Worker
Answer
1 1 good_worker age 0.75 age
2 1 poor_worker age 0.58 age
3 1 good_worker age 0.78 age
4 1 good_worker age 0.95 tissue
5 1 poor_worker age 0.54 age
!13
Workerview
Taskview
14. Calculate Worker
Performance
Avg. proportion of times a
worker is in agreement with other
workers for a given task
vs.
all tasks performed by the worker
Range
[0…1]
Threshold
identify
!
Easy Hard
Good Poor
!14
15. Easy Tasks
!15
Hard Tasks!
Worker
Label
Truth
Worker
Accuracy
Worker
Answer
1 1 good_worker age 0.75 age
2 1 poor_worker age 0.58 age
3 1 good_worker age 0.78 age
4 1 good_worker age 0.95 tissue
5 1 poor_worker age 0.54 age
Worker
Label
Truth
Worker
Accuracy
Worker
Answer
2 2 good_worker age 0.75 treatment
3 2 poor_worker age 0.58 disease
15 2 good_worker age 0.78 age
17 2 poor_worker age 0.95 tissue
20 2 poor_worker age 0.54
Taskview
Taskview
16. Stage 1:
• Train all
workers
• On a proportion
of tasks
• Identify best
workers &
• Hard tasks
2 Stages
!16
!
Stage 2:
• Assign best
workers to
• Hard tasks &
• Remaining tasks
• Calculate
Overall
Accuracy
!
18. Simulate Worker Answer
Stage 2
!
Hard
Good
simulate
Remaining
Tasks
!18
Task
Label
Truth
Task
Difficulty
Worker
Answer
1 1 hard_task age 0.54 age
1 2 hard_task age 0.42 tissue
1 3 hard_task age 0.45 disease
1 4 easy_task age 0.80 age
1 5 easy_task age 0.70 age
Workerview
19. Merge Stage 1 and 2
& Assign Answers
!19
Worker
Label
Truth
Worker
Accuracy
Worker
Answer
1 1 good_worker age 0.75 age
2 1 poor_worker age 0.58 age
3 1 good_worker age 0.78 age
4 1 good_worker age 0.95 tissue
5 1 poor_worker age 0.54 age
Taskview
Answer = age
20. Assessing Design
Merged Dataset
calculate
!20
Overall Accuracy
avg. of all the tasks
which had consensus
Worker
Label
Truth
Worker
Accuracy
Worker
Answer
1 1 good_worker age 0.75 age
2 1 poor_worker age 0.58 age
3 1 good_worker age 0.78 age
4 1 good_worker age 0.95 tissue
5 1 poor_worker age 0.54 age
Taskview
22. • Results support the
intuition that reduced
difficulty (10%) in tasks
result in higher
accuracy
!22
23. • calculating the
performance of the
workers in combination
with whether she was a
good worker (from the
beginning) ensures that
she is the best worker
• adopting the two-
staged algorithm
ensures that only the
best workers are chosen
to perform all the tasks
!23
25. CrowdED recommendation
• no. of workers should be 40-60% of the total number
of tasks
• train workers on 40-60% of the tasks in Stage 1
• set the number of workers per task to be either 3, 5 or
7 (fewer than 9)
• reduce the number of hard tasks
• adopt the two-staged algorithm to identify the best
workers
!25
27. Conclusion & Future Work
• Two-staged statistical design for designing optimal crowdsourcing experiments
• a-priori estimate optimal workers and tasks' assignment to obtain maximum
accuracy on all tasks
• Implemented in Python, open source, Jupyter notebook
• Future work
• Training the workers vs. not training
• Real-world experiments and comparison with baseline approaches
• Include budgetary constraints
• Extend the interface to allow user to vary parameters and observe sensitivity the
design is to various assumptions
!27