$1,400.00
CropMetrics
Precision Data Specialist
CropMetrics Precision Water Management
Program - A Profitable Partnership
Opportunity for Growers and Dealers!
CropMetrics
Precision Data Specialist
26 nov16 managing_irrigation_challenges_opportunities_and_way forwardIWRS Society
Managing Irrigation: Challenges, Opportunities and Way Forward
Alok K Sikka
International Water Management Institute IWMI Representative‐India, New Delhi
Improving Water Productivity: options at farm level.ICARDA
Presentation by Mr. Atef Swelam (ICARDA),
Technical Session 8: “Water productivity as the cornerstone of water-limited food production.”
Monday 21/10/2019
Cairo, Egypt, October 20-24, 2019. The 2nd Cairo Water Week (CWW)
Effect of conservation agriculture on soil moisture content and biomass water...Innspub Net
One of the important principles of Conservation Agriculture is the permanent soil cover with crop residues which enhances soil and water productivity that leads to improved agricultural productivity. The effect of crop residues on soil moisture content, relative growth rate and biomass water productivity were examined in a completely randomized design at the University of Reading, Berkshire district, England. Straw treatment was significant on moisture content and water use efficiency at (p< 0.01) respectively while there is no significant difference on mean relative growth rate and dry final biomass weights. The study concluded that soil moisture content is conserved with increased use of crop residues as soil cover. The study therefore recommended that project based research on Conservation Agriculture should be carried out by governments and NGO’s that will involve farmers; also they should provide support for the knowledge diffusion of Conservation Agriculture to local farmers since it will improve yield and productivity. Extension agents and other agencies that work with farmers should also be properly trained to be able to disseminate this technology to farmers.
Installment 8 of “World Resources Report: Creating a Sustainable Food Future” explores the potential to improve water management in rice production in order to reduce agricultural greenhouse gas emissions and save water. Find out more at http://www.wri.org/blog/2014/12/more-rice-less-methane
26 nov16 managing_irrigation_challenges_opportunities_and_way forwardIWRS Society
Managing Irrigation: Challenges, Opportunities and Way Forward
Alok K Sikka
International Water Management Institute IWMI Representative‐India, New Delhi
Improving Water Productivity: options at farm level.ICARDA
Presentation by Mr. Atef Swelam (ICARDA),
Technical Session 8: “Water productivity as the cornerstone of water-limited food production.”
Monday 21/10/2019
Cairo, Egypt, October 20-24, 2019. The 2nd Cairo Water Week (CWW)
Effect of conservation agriculture on soil moisture content and biomass water...Innspub Net
One of the important principles of Conservation Agriculture is the permanent soil cover with crop residues which enhances soil and water productivity that leads to improved agricultural productivity. The effect of crop residues on soil moisture content, relative growth rate and biomass water productivity were examined in a completely randomized design at the University of Reading, Berkshire district, England. Straw treatment was significant on moisture content and water use efficiency at (p< 0.01) respectively while there is no significant difference on mean relative growth rate and dry final biomass weights. The study concluded that soil moisture content is conserved with increased use of crop residues as soil cover. The study therefore recommended that project based research on Conservation Agriculture should be carried out by governments and NGO’s that will involve farmers; also they should provide support for the knowledge diffusion of Conservation Agriculture to local farmers since it will improve yield and productivity. Extension agents and other agencies that work with farmers should also be properly trained to be able to disseminate this technology to farmers.
Installment 8 of “World Resources Report: Creating a Sustainable Food Future” explores the potential to improve water management in rice production in order to reduce agricultural greenhouse gas emissions and save water. Find out more at http://www.wri.org/blog/2014/12/more-rice-less-methane
26nov16 a low_cost_drip_irrigation_system_for_adoption_in_jhum_areas_in_nagal...IWRS Society
A LOW COST DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEM FOR ADOPTION IN JHUM AREAS IN NAGALAND FOR FOOD SECURITY.
National Workshop on‐ Challenges in Irrigation Management for Food Security
27 nov16 irrigation_management_by_loss_reduction_recycling_and_water_transferIWRS Society
IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT BY LOSS REDUCTION, RECYCLING AND WATER TRANSFER
S. K. Mazumder
Former AICTE Emeritus Professor
L.V. Kumar
Former Director, Central Water Commission Former General Manager, WAPC
Christine Brown - Canadian Livestock Producers Efforts to Improve Water QualityJohn Blue
Canadian Livestock Producers Efforts to Improve Water Quality - Christine Brown, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, from the 2020 Conservation Tillage and Technology Conference, held March 3-4, 2020, Ada, OH, USA.
27 nov16 water_and_fertilizer_management_using_micro_irrigationIWRS Society
Water and Fertilizer Management Using Micro Irrigation
PROF. K.N.TIWARI
Agricultural and Food Engineering Department
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
India
Industrial Digitisation / AgTech: Company presentation by Gal Yareden, SVP Corporate Commercial Solutions at Netafim at the NOAH Conference 2019 in Tel Aviv, Hangar 11, 10-11 April 2019.
Presentation by Dr Sultan Ahmed, Director of Natural Resources Management and Research, Department of Environment, Government of Bangladesh at CCAFS webinar 'Exploring GHG mitigation potential in rice production' on 18 September 2014.
Mapping suitable niche for cactus and legumes in diversified farming in drylandsICARDA
Presentation by Chandrashekhar Biradar and team.
16-18 October 2019. Hyderabad, India. TRUST: Humans, Machines & Ecosystems. This year’s Convention was hosted by The International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT). The Platform is led by the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
The water balanced of a place, whether it be an agricultural field, watershed, or continent, can be determined by calculating the input, output, and storage changes of water at the Earth's surface. The major input of water is from precipitation and output is evapotranspiration. The water balance is intended for use as a screening tool to further evaluates water resources allocations within the watershed and to identify water balance components that may require further analysis during the next levels of watersheds planning. The study area chosen for the present study area is Doddavalabhi sub watershed which falls in Kolar taluk of Kolar district. The study areas geographically lies between 760 8’ 0” E and 760 23’ 0” E longitude and 120 20’ 0” N and 120 28’ 0” N latitudes with an area 15.20 sq.km. For the determination of crop water requirement for Kolar major crops considered are ragi and groundnut with the crop period of 120 days and 140 days respectively. The year and monthly wise potential evapotranspiration and actual evapotranspiration is calculated by using penman method, blaney-criddle method, pan evaporation and radiation methods. The year wise potential evapotranspiration calculated by Blaney-criddle is maximum 645.66 mm during 2014, in this year monthly PET is maximum in July month ie 150.4mm. The year wise potential evapotranspiration calculated by Pan Evaporation is maximum 236.43 mm during 2014, in this year monthly PET is maximum in July month ie 56.67mm. The Year wise actual evapotranspiration is also maximum during 2014 for both ragi and groundnut. Hence Blaney criddle method is best suitable since it provides the most satisfactory results compared to other methods because this method is suggested for areas where available climatic data cover air temperature data only.
Remote Sensing for Assessing Crop Residue Cover and Soil Tillage IntensityCIMMYT
Remote sensing –Beyond images
Mexico 14-15 December 2013
The workshop was organized by CIMMYT Global Conservation Agriculture Program (GCAP) and funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), the Mexican Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development, Fisheries and Food (SAGARPA), the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), CGIAR Research Program on Maize, the Cereal System Initiative for South Asia (CSISA) and the Sustainable Modernization of the Traditional Agriculture (MasAgro)
From compaction to tile spacing, learn the many factors
that determine the best drainage system for profit and environmental benefit. Peter Johnson, RealAgriculture & Jesse Tait, Tait Farm Drainage
Water requirements and irrigation scheduling of pearl millet in rajasthankunalsahu9883
In this project, we choose 10 districts of Rajasthan with the highest production of pearl millet.
Found crop water requirements in all the districts.
Used CropWAT to get an irrigation schedule.
Used ArcGIS to project the obtained results
Irrigation of agricultural crops in Californiaprostoalex
What percentage of California’s water is
used by agriculture?
* 80 %: based on the developed water supply
* 52 %: based on the total water supply of a dry
year
* 29 %: based on the total water supply of a wet
year
26nov16 a low_cost_drip_irrigation_system_for_adoption_in_jhum_areas_in_nagal...IWRS Society
A LOW COST DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEM FOR ADOPTION IN JHUM AREAS IN NAGALAND FOR FOOD SECURITY.
National Workshop on‐ Challenges in Irrigation Management for Food Security
27 nov16 irrigation_management_by_loss_reduction_recycling_and_water_transferIWRS Society
IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT BY LOSS REDUCTION, RECYCLING AND WATER TRANSFER
S. K. Mazumder
Former AICTE Emeritus Professor
L.V. Kumar
Former Director, Central Water Commission Former General Manager, WAPC
Christine Brown - Canadian Livestock Producers Efforts to Improve Water QualityJohn Blue
Canadian Livestock Producers Efforts to Improve Water Quality - Christine Brown, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, from the 2020 Conservation Tillage and Technology Conference, held March 3-4, 2020, Ada, OH, USA.
27 nov16 water_and_fertilizer_management_using_micro_irrigationIWRS Society
Water and Fertilizer Management Using Micro Irrigation
PROF. K.N.TIWARI
Agricultural and Food Engineering Department
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
India
Industrial Digitisation / AgTech: Company presentation by Gal Yareden, SVP Corporate Commercial Solutions at Netafim at the NOAH Conference 2019 in Tel Aviv, Hangar 11, 10-11 April 2019.
Presentation by Dr Sultan Ahmed, Director of Natural Resources Management and Research, Department of Environment, Government of Bangladesh at CCAFS webinar 'Exploring GHG mitigation potential in rice production' on 18 September 2014.
Mapping suitable niche for cactus and legumes in diversified farming in drylandsICARDA
Presentation by Chandrashekhar Biradar and team.
16-18 October 2019. Hyderabad, India. TRUST: Humans, Machines & Ecosystems. This year’s Convention was hosted by The International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT). The Platform is led by the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
The water balanced of a place, whether it be an agricultural field, watershed, or continent, can be determined by calculating the input, output, and storage changes of water at the Earth's surface. The major input of water is from precipitation and output is evapotranspiration. The water balance is intended for use as a screening tool to further evaluates water resources allocations within the watershed and to identify water balance components that may require further analysis during the next levels of watersheds planning. The study area chosen for the present study area is Doddavalabhi sub watershed which falls in Kolar taluk of Kolar district. The study areas geographically lies between 760 8’ 0” E and 760 23’ 0” E longitude and 120 20’ 0” N and 120 28’ 0” N latitudes with an area 15.20 sq.km. For the determination of crop water requirement for Kolar major crops considered are ragi and groundnut with the crop period of 120 days and 140 days respectively. The year and monthly wise potential evapotranspiration and actual evapotranspiration is calculated by using penman method, blaney-criddle method, pan evaporation and radiation methods. The year wise potential evapotranspiration calculated by Blaney-criddle is maximum 645.66 mm during 2014, in this year monthly PET is maximum in July month ie 150.4mm. The year wise potential evapotranspiration calculated by Pan Evaporation is maximum 236.43 mm during 2014, in this year monthly PET is maximum in July month ie 56.67mm. The Year wise actual evapotranspiration is also maximum during 2014 for both ragi and groundnut. Hence Blaney criddle method is best suitable since it provides the most satisfactory results compared to other methods because this method is suggested for areas where available climatic data cover air temperature data only.
Remote Sensing for Assessing Crop Residue Cover and Soil Tillage IntensityCIMMYT
Remote sensing –Beyond images
Mexico 14-15 December 2013
The workshop was organized by CIMMYT Global Conservation Agriculture Program (GCAP) and funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), the Mexican Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development, Fisheries and Food (SAGARPA), the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), CGIAR Research Program on Maize, the Cereal System Initiative for South Asia (CSISA) and the Sustainable Modernization of the Traditional Agriculture (MasAgro)
From compaction to tile spacing, learn the many factors
that determine the best drainage system for profit and environmental benefit. Peter Johnson, RealAgriculture & Jesse Tait, Tait Farm Drainage
Water requirements and irrigation scheduling of pearl millet in rajasthankunalsahu9883
In this project, we choose 10 districts of Rajasthan with the highest production of pearl millet.
Found crop water requirements in all the districts.
Used CropWAT to get an irrigation schedule.
Used ArcGIS to project the obtained results
Irrigation of agricultural crops in Californiaprostoalex
What percentage of California’s water is
used by agriculture?
* 80 %: based on the developed water supply
* 52 %: based on the total water supply of a dry
year
* 29 %: based on the total water supply of a wet
year
“Impacts of deficit irrigation practices for conserving water in horticultural cropping systems of Florida” by Davie Kadyampakeni at the 2023 Water for Food Global Conference. A recording of the presentation can be found on the conference playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLSBeKOIXsg3JNyPowwJj6NDSpx4vlnCYj.
Improving infield water management - Simon Turner (Agri Tech Ltd)Farming Futures
This presentation formed part of the Farming Futures workshop 'Irrigation in a changing climate: save water, save money, get fit for the future'.
17th November 2009
Ground Validation of Crop Water Productivity: Developing a protocol, Christop...NENAwaterscarcity
Workshop on Operationalizing the Regional Collaborative Platform to Address ‘Water Consumption, Water Productivity and Drought Management’ in Agriculture, 27 - 29 October 2015, Cairo,Egypt
As part of the seminar held by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in collaboration with IWMI, World fish and ICARDA “Options for improving irrigation water efficiency for sustainable agricultural development”.
Presented by IWMI's Winston Yu at the WASAG Working Group on Agricultural Water Use Workshop, led by IWMI, held in CIHEAM-Bari, Valenzano, Italy, on February 25, 2020.
Big Data and Digital Augmentation for Sustainable AgroecosystemsICARDA
23-25 April 2019. Morocco. Agri Analytics Days.
Presentation by Dr. Biradar Chandrashekhar (see picture) - Digital augmentation for sustainable agroecosystems - ICARDA
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdfMalak Abu Hammad
Discover how MongoDB Atlas and vector search technology can revolutionize your application's search capabilities. This comprehensive presentation covers:
* What is Vector Search?
* Importance and benefits of vector search
* Practical use cases across various industries
* Step-by-step implementation guide
* Live demos with code snippets
* Enhancing LLM capabilities with vector search
* Best practices and optimization strategies
Perfect for developers, AI enthusiasts, and tech leaders. Learn how to leverage MongoDB Atlas to deliver highly relevant, context-aware search results, transforming your data retrieval process. Stay ahead in tech innovation and maximize the potential of your applications.
#MongoDB #VectorSearch #AI #SemanticSearch #TechInnovation #DataScience #LLM #MachineLearning #SearchTechnology
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024Albert Hoitingh
In this session I delve into the encryption technology used in Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Purview. Including the concepts of Customer Key and Double Key Encryption.
In the rapidly evolving landscape of technologies, XML continues to play a vital role in structuring, storing, and transporting data across diverse systems. The recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) present new methodologies for enhancing XML development workflows, introducing efficiency, automation, and intelligent capabilities. This presentation will outline the scope and perspective of utilizing AI in XML development. The potential benefits and the possible pitfalls will be highlighted, providing a balanced view of the subject.
We will explore the capabilities of AI in understanding XML markup languages and autonomously creating structured XML content. Additionally, we will examine the capacity of AI to enrich plain text with appropriate XML markup. Practical examples and methodological guidelines will be provided to elucidate how AI can be effectively prompted to interpret and generate accurate XML markup.
Further emphasis will be placed on the role of AI in developing XSLT, or schemas such as XSD and Schematron. We will address the techniques and strategies adopted to create prompts for generating code, explaining code, or refactoring the code, and the results achieved.
The discussion will extend to how AI can be used to transform XML content. In particular, the focus will be on the use of AI XPath extension functions in XSLT, Schematron, Schematron Quick Fixes, or for XML content refactoring.
The presentation aims to deliver a comprehensive overview of AI usage in XML development, providing attendees with the necessary knowledge to make informed decisions. Whether you’re at the early stages of adopting AI or considering integrating it in advanced XML development, this presentation will cover all levels of expertise.
By highlighting the potential advantages and challenges of integrating AI with XML development tools and languages, the presentation seeks to inspire thoughtful conversation around the future of XML development. We’ll not only delve into the technical aspects of AI-powered XML development but also discuss practical implications and possible future directions.
Threats to mobile devices are more prevalent and increasing in scope and complexity. Users of mobile devices desire to take full advantage of the features
available on those devices, but many of the features provide convenience and capability but sacrifice security. This best practices guide outlines steps the users can take to better protect personal devices and information.
Maruthi Prithivirajan, Head of ASEAN & IN Solution Architecture, Neo4j
Get an inside look at the latest Neo4j innovations that enable relationship-driven intelligence at scale. Learn more about the newest cloud integrations and product enhancements that make Neo4j an essential choice for developers building apps with interconnected data and generative AI.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 5. In this session, we will cover CI/CD with devops.
Topics covered:
CI/CD with in UiPath
End-to-end overview of CI/CD pipeline with Azure devops
Speaker:
Lyndsey Byblow, Test Suite Sales Engineer @ UiPath, Inc.
A tale of scale & speed: How the US Navy is enabling software delivery from l...sonjaschweigert1
Rapid and secure feature delivery is a goal across every application team and every branch of the DoD. The Navy’s DevSecOps platform, Party Barge, has achieved:
- Reduction in onboarding time from 5 weeks to 1 day
- Improved developer experience and productivity through actionable findings and reduction of false positives
- Maintenance of superior security standards and inherent policy enforcement with Authorization to Operate (ATO)
Development teams can ship efficiently and ensure applications are cyber ready for Navy Authorizing Officials (AOs). In this webinar, Sigma Defense and Anchore will give attendees a look behind the scenes and demo secure pipeline automation and security artifacts that speed up application ATO and time to production.
We will cover:
- How to remove silos in DevSecOps
- How to build efficient development pipeline roles and component templates
- How to deliver security artifacts that matter for ATO’s (SBOMs, vulnerability reports, and policy evidence)
- How to streamline operations with automated policy checks on container images
In his public lecture, Christian Timmerer provides insights into the fascinating history of video streaming, starting from its humble beginnings before YouTube to the groundbreaking technologies that now dominate platforms like Netflix and ORF ON. Timmerer also presents provocative contributions of his own that have significantly influenced the industry. He concludes by looking at future challenges and invites the audience to join in a discussion.
20 Comprehensive Checklist of Designing and Developing a WebsitePixlogix Infotech
Dive into the world of Website Designing and Developing with Pixlogix! Looking to create a stunning online presence? Look no further! Our comprehensive checklist covers everything you need to know to craft a website that stands out. From user-friendly design to seamless functionality, we've got you covered. Don't miss out on this invaluable resource! Check out our checklist now at Pixlogix and start your journey towards a captivating online presence today.
Unlocking Productivity: Leveraging the Potential of Copilot in Microsoft 365, a presentation by Christoforos Vlachos, Senior Solutions Manager – Modern Workplace, Uni Systems
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 daysAdtran
At WSTS 2024, Alon Stern explored the topic of parametric holdover and explained how recent research findings can be implemented in real-world PNT networks to achieve 100 nanoseconds of accuracy for up to 100 days.
GridMate - End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid...ThomasParaiso2
End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid regressions. In this session, we share our journey building an E2E testing pipeline for GridMate components (LWC and Aura) using Cypress, JSForce, FakerJS…
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FMESafe Software
In this second installment of our Essentials of Automations webinar series, we’ll explore the landscape of triggers and actions, guiding you through the nuances of authoring and adapting workspaces for seamless automations. Gain an understanding of the full spectrum of triggers and actions available in FME, empowering you to enhance your workspaces for efficient automation.
We’ll kick things off by showcasing the most commonly used event-based triggers, introducing you to various automation workflows like manual triggers, schedules, directory watchers, and more. Plus, see how these elements play out in real scenarios.
Whether you’re tweaking your current setup or building from the ground up, this session will arm you with the tools and insights needed to transform your FME usage into a powerhouse of productivity. Join us to discover effective strategies that simplify complex processes, enhancing your productivity and transforming your data management practices with FME. Let’s turn complexity into clarity and make your workspaces work wonders!
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!SOFTTECHHUB
As the digital landscape continually evolves, operating systems play a critical role in shaping user experiences and productivity. The launch of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 marks a significant milestone, offering a robust alternative to traditional systems such as Windows 11. This article delves into the essence of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, exploring its unique features, advantages, and how it stands as a compelling choice for both casual users and tech enthusiasts.
Full-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalizationZilliz
Mike Del Balso, CEO & Co-Founder at Tecton, presents "Full RAG," a novel approach to AI recommendation systems, aiming to push beyond the limitations of traditional models through a deep integration of contextual insights and real-time data, leveraging the Retrieval-Augmented Generation architecture. This talk will outline Full RAG's potential to significantly enhance personalization, address engineering challenges such as data management and model training, and introduce data enrichment with reranking as a key solution. Attendees will gain crucial insights into the importance of hyperpersonalization in AI, the capabilities of Full RAG for advanced personalization, and strategies for managing complex data integrations for deploying cutting-edge AI solutions.
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptxdanishmna97
Pakdata Cf is a groundbreaking system designed to streamline and facilitate access to CNIC information. This innovative platform leverages advanced technology to provide users with efficient and secure access to their CNIC details.
2. What is Precision Agriculture?
Define Precision
Webster's Dictionary Definition:
Quality of being precise, definite, exact, very
accurate, distinguished from every other.
Webster's Dictionary Definition:
Quality of being precise, definite, exact, very
accurate, distinguished from every other.
3. What should growers be able to
accomplish with Precision Technology?
Increase Yield and/or Reduce Input Costs
Profit!!
Must =
4. Are Precision Ag Solutions Attainable?
Are Precision Ag Solutions Repeatable?
Are Precision Ag Solutions Sustainable?
Yes
Do they promote good stewardship?
6. Traditional Approach for Zone
Development
–Satellite Images (Multiple Year)
–Yield Maps (Multiple Year)
–Grid Samples (Point to Point Variation)
–USDA Maps (50+ year old technology)
What’s the problem with these
options for zone development?
A Shifting Foundational Base
21. How do we control irrigation to maximize
root growth and increase profits?
• Routinely measure soil water status to account
for:
– Rainfall
– Mechanical Irrigation applications
– Crop water use
• Apply water at the right time, right amount, in
the right locations of the field based on:
– Soil water storage availability
– Active root zone of crop
– Water needs of the crop
22. Plant soil water uptake, root development, and uptake distribution
V9
V6
V3VE
V12
V15
V18
VT
R1
Detasseled
R4 R5 R6
Physiological Maturity
.40
.35
.30
.27
.25
.20
.15
.12
.08
.04
0
Cornwateruptake(in/day)RootDepth(IN)
12”
24”
36”
48”
Where is the water coming from?
49%
47%
4%
% of total water use by depth
32%
68%
32%
32%4%
32%
28. • Two pivots side by side
• Same hybrids, same fertility same populations
• Probes in both fields
– we watered managed pivot based on probe
– grower watered legacy pivot according to historical
• Tracked water application, energy costs, and yields
on both
39. Heaviest Soil Type – VRI Comparison
Flat/Legacy Rate
VRI Rate
Water penetrated 32”
deep into the profile
Reduced Water
Application -
Water only penetrated 16”
deep into the profile
40. Lightest Soil Type – VRI Comparison
Flat/Legacy Rate
VRI Rate
Water only penetrated
4” deep into the profile
Increased Water
Application -
Water penetrated 16”
deep into the profile
46. x
9.3 Acre Yield Average
Before VRI
190
9.3 Acre Yield Average
After VRI
218
28 Bu/Acre Yield Improvement
28 Bu x 9.3 Acres
260.4 Bu. Improvement
260.4 Bu. x $ 7.00
$1822.80
There was also
a 20% Water
Saving
And the
Pivot Didn’t
get Stuck!!
47. Precision Starter Program – Before…
2 Year Average = 47
Bushel Difference
47 bu x $7.00 = $329/ac
12 acres = $3948 Total
2010 Zone 1 = 51 Bushel
Difference
2011 Zone 1 = 43 Bushel
Difference
Precision Starter Program – After!!
Implemented VR Seeding and VRI in 2012
2012 Zone 1 =11 Bushel
Difference
36 Bushel Improvement Over Previous 2 Year Average!
36 bu x $7.00 = $252/ac Improvement
12 acres = $3024 Total Field Improvement
48. VRI Variety Trial
Pleasanton, NE
8 Hybrid Strips x 2 Optimally
Positioned by EM Soil Type
Alternating VRI Speed Control with
Flat Rate Irrigation every 30 Degrees
49. 7A631 7V657 7V697 8A818 8T597 8T812 8V169 8V777 Average
197.8
196.9
194.7
187.1
195.0
188.5
186.5
190.9
192.2
204.1
202.6
208.7
204.9
206.6
203.3
207.0 206.6
205.5
Flat Rate Irrigation VRI Speed Control
VRI Variety Trial
Macek Place Pivot – B&B Partners – Pleasanton, NE
Corn Hybrid
Corn Yield
Averaged
13.3 bushels
more w/ VRI
Same Pivot. Same Rainfall. Same Hybrid. Same Yield Monitor. Same Irrigation Schedule. Different Irrigation Rate.
54. Provides All the Tools To Build
a Precision Water Management System
Daily Evapotranspiration
Onset of Water
stress, Permanent
Wilting Point
Soil Water holding
Capacity
Irrigation Full and Refill
Points
Drainage, Groundwater
Recharge Rates
Rainfall Efficiency
Saturation & Field
Capacity (Upper Drained
Limit)
Determination of
effective Root Zone
(water uptake)
Water table Fluctuations
Soil Profile Infiltration
Dynamics
VRI Prescriptions
Hybrid response profiles
56. Precision Water Management - A Systems
Approach That Provides All The
Tools You Need To Manage Water
And Increase Your Profitability
– A ATTAINABLE Precision Ag Solution!
– A REPEATABLE Precision Ag Solution!!
– A SUSTAINABLE Precision Ag Solution!!!
57. More Than Just Variable Rate Technology
It’s a True Precision Ag Program
Precision Data Specialist
Information Support Specialist
62. Precision Water Solutions
PSP Mapping Program: $10.00 / ac
VRI Lifetime License: $1500 / pivot
End Tower Telemetry: $1500/ pivot
Annual Investments
Complete Water Solution Package
VRI Services: $ 575.00
Soil Moisture Probe: $2650/ probe
Full Service Probe: $1,400.00
Editor's Notes
What is Precision Agriculture?
Precision Technology can either increase yields or reduce input cost or both, but in the end it must generate a profit to be sustainable.
For precision ag solutions to become widely adapted by growers we have to ask ourselves 3 questions. Are they economically attainable? Are they repeatable year in and year out? And, can we sustain them over a period of numerous growing seasons. If so, then the final question we should ask is, do they promote good stewardship?
There is a lot of buzz around using “Variable Rate Technologies” VRT to increase precision. An those tools can certainly help, but we have to make sure they have a sound basic foundation or we can up with a VRM, Variable Rate Mess.
The traditional approach for precision variable rate zone development has been to base it on one or more of these data layers. The problem with most of these is they are certainly attainable, they quite often aren’t repeatable because they are derived from a shifting foundation base, that changes based on environment, hybrids, crop type, etc.
Here is an example of why using just yield maps to create management zones can be a problem. In this field you can see that that the east end of the field had the highest yields. Using our VRT algorithms this would be an area where we would try to maximize our productivity by increasing our inputs. However, the our yield maps very from year to year as we change crops. Here you can see the highest yielding part of the field in corn is the lower yielding part of the field when we change to soybeans. So, which map do we use or should we combine both and average everything out? This is not a good basis for repeatable solutions year after year.
So, if we don’t change crops and stay in a corn on corn rotation, are yield maps a good repeatable and sustainable foundation to build precision solutions. I would say no and here's a prime example of why. This field averaged 183 bu in 2009 with a flat rate of inputs, but we had an area where we the yields were significantly less. In 2010 the problem area improved and was better than the field average and in 2011 it was one of the highest yielding parts of the field. No inputs were VR on this field, the only change was the hybrid. How much would it have cost you if you had used your 2009 yield map to develop a prescription to reduce your inputs to match the yield potential in that low yielding zone?All inputs flat rated here. Field averages are in red. There is not that much difference in the field averages. However look inside the outlined box. This is a problem. That area went from being the worst area in the field to the best. Would we have seen that if we hade used the 2009 Yield Map to generate a Rx. This would have meant that we would decrease the production inputs in that area. Had we done that we may have never seen that area become the high production area.
So, I think it’s obvious that the one data layer that has consistent repeatable variability year after year is the soil. With that in mind, maybe the solution would be to base all your prescription maps on the NRSC soil changes. Here’s why we don’t recommend that option either. This is a government soil map of a field that was produced by a team of surveyors in 1991. You can clearly see the changes in the soils in the field and we might consider basing our prescriptions on those zones. However, we took that same field in 1993 and remapped with a different team of surveyors and got this map. Then in 1997 another team came up with this one. Are these maps accurate enough to build your precision ag program on? Probably not.
The foundation for all of solutions are based on obtainable, sustainable and repeatable EC, “Electrical Conductivity” maps that are combined with RTK elevation and topography maps. These will never change unless you move soil into, out of, or around the field.
The consistency of EC Data is always going to remain the same. There will be changes in the numbers as the soils become drier or wetter, but as you can see here, when we repeated the EC mapping in each of the years, the zones remained the same.
Soil EC Raw Data Collection develops a virtual picture of the what’s below the soil by measuring the electrical conductivity at 12” and 36”. A typical map produced with and EM sled with have 14 to 16,000 data points. Compare that that a typical grid fertility map of 30 to 50 data points. Much more detailed and accurate portrail of what’s below the soil.
Of course topography is also a keep factor in maximizing production. This is a center pivot in Custer county Nebraska. Do you think having the same water and other input prescriptions should be the same on both of these fields? We identify those topogray variables with our RTK data and adjust the water accordingly.
This is an example of using an EC sled to collect data on a field.
Veris EC Data collection. Coulters must make contact to the soil. Either of these system will work to collect accurate data provided the operator is skilled in using the equipment. The Veris machine requires a little more set up and equipment because it’s basically a small disk that requires the blades to be in good contact with the soil. And of course you need something with some Hp to pull it. If you have already had fields mapped, we maybe able to use that data too.
Deep sub soil EC Maps. Look at the flow of soil consistency across the fence lines. Then notice how the USDA soils maps do not always line up.
Soil and topography are fixed variable data layers. They never change. This has to be the foundation for any repeatable and sustainable agronomic prescription for any field. We can analyze the changing variables, (i.e. yield), against the fixed variables (soil and topography) to build a true precision ag solution. Soil and Topography are fixed data layers. They will never change. This slide is animated to show the fixed data layers of EC, LSC, and Aspect. These are needed to build true precision ag solutions. Then changing variables such as yield can be analyzed against these fixed variables. These fixed variables form a foundational base that all changing variables can be analyzed against every year
Once we’ve identified the fixed variables, we can analyze how those characteristics affect yield. Here you see a very positive correlation to yield and increasing EC, but a negative correlation to increases in landscape change.
Most yield variations come from the fixed field variations of topography and or soil water holding capacity. So, just writing a prescription that variable rates fertility may not provide the solution you are looking for.Analyzing yield data against fixed variables. Remember the yield map against the grid data? This is evidence that nutrients are not always the problem with yield variation. Most yield variation will come from fixed variations in soil and topography.
As I mentioned our precision ag focus starts with water. Strategic application of water, will maximize the root growth and nutrient uptake.
We must account for all the sources of water increases and decreases during the cropping season. Then, using sound agronomic we apply just the right amount of water, at the right time, and in the right location to maximize irrigation efficiency.
Here is an example of why timing and application amount is so important. Up until nearly tassel, all of the water uptake is in the top foot of the profile. So, we want to make sure we measure that zone apply water accordingly. As the crop grows into kernel fill, it gradually starts pulling water from the deeper layers. It is critically important that we don’t stress the crop during reproduction. Every day of stress during that time can take off 10% of our yield.
We provide a moisture gage for our growers. Think about this way; all of us have a gage in our vehicle that we use to schedule fill ups. If we take that gage away or refill strategy changes. Instead of strategically managing our fuel down to the last part of the tank we just keep it full. Growers use that same philosophy when it comes to managing water. If they don’t have a gage to tell them when to refill, they just keep the tank (or profile) full. This leads to over irrigation
This a picture of what the system looks like once we get it installed, up and running. We want to get all the probes installed in a corn crop between 2 and 6 leaf. At about the 8 leaf stage the roots canopy below ground and we run the risk of trimming roots producing readings that don’t represent the rest of the field. If we install it before 2 leaf we risk having to reinstall if one of the plants dampens off.
This is the “water gage” we install in our fields. The top arrow indicates the full point. Anything above this means the tank if over full and water is being wasted. The bottom arrow shows the refill point. Think of this as your “low fuel light”. You aren’t our of gas yet but you need to start thinking about refilling. The stepping action in the center is a daily water change, or kind of like a your MPG of your vehicle. You see a flatting out of the line at night because the crop only uses water during photosynthesis.
Each field has as these three water graphs displayed. The top one show the daily change in moisture in the three foot profile. The middle graph shows what is happing with water at each of the sensor levels, and bottom graph is the interpolated sum graph. This gives you a picture of the total water in the soil profile. On our TriScan sensors we also are able to display VIC of each sensor. This gives us a picture of what is happening to the fertilizer movement in the profile.
All of our moisture probe data is delivered to our growers through our website. We read water in the profile at 4, 8, 12, 20, and 36 inches every half hour. So we are collecting and delivering 240 data points on every field every day. How does this compare to a weekly scouting visit.
We did three years of studies where we asked growers to give us two side by side pivots with the same inputs and timing. We had the grower manage the legacy pivot with his usual method of irrigation and we managed the other with the probe. We tracked costs and yields on both circles. We decreased water application by about 3” in most of the situations and in every case increased yields.
Our energy costs (the only cost we measure) showed a significant savings. We also increased yields because we didn’t over water. Because of that the net return to the grower was nearly $50/acre with $6.00/bushel corn
When you really look at a pivot, does it stand to reason that every acre in that 135 acre circle should get exactly the same amount of water? Or would our efficiency be increased if there were a way to evaluate the water holding capacity and slope of each section of the field and adjust water accordingly? This is where VRI comes in. We take into account all of these things then develop a prescription that adjusts the water application each 2-6 degrees based on those factors. This is all done remotely and is completely hands off for the growers.
Human nature will be to use the driest part of the field to make decisions on watering. If we water the entire field based on that concept, we will over water the heavier parts of the field unless we have a way to apply more or less water based on the soil characteristics and topography of the field. This unintentional over watering costs us money in yield loss and fertilizer leaching.This slide simply indicates that it is a natural human nature to water to the lighter soil in the field. We do not want any area of the field to become under watered when we have a center pivot available. However as the pivot comes through the light soil area and into the heavy soil, we will overwater every time. This is known as unintentional overwatering.
The first thing we do is analyze a pivot to determine the extent of variability in the field. We then you our software to determine the how much of that variability we can reduce with speed controlled VRI. Generally there is a close correlation to variability reduction and yield increase. So, a 4% decrease in variability will usually bring about a 4% increase in yield. Speed control however doesn’t address the variably with the sector. As you can see here we have quite a bit of variability in that 6 degree slice but we can’t account for that without nozzle control. However, we are still watering to the average soil in the slice vs the average or even lightest soil in the field so it’s still closer.This slide simply helps us to identify water holding capacity variability. We know that different soils hold different amounts of water. However, how much difference is there in any given field? We really won't know until we break the pivot down into sectors. We use sectors because pivots can only water in a circle therefore analyzing it any other way would not make much sense. Speed control irrigation does have its limitations however. As you may notice on the west side of this field there is changing variability under the pivot in several sectors. However when you take the sector slices out of the picture the variability is still there. Therefore, using software we will more accurately water that area then we would under flat rate irrigation.
This is what a VRI prescription might look like. The blue areas will receive more water and red areas less. The green areas will be near the base rate.
The placement of the probe is critical to accurately representing the field. If you get it in the average soil with the base rate you will over or under water the rest of the field. Or software calculates the median elevation and the average soil texture then eliminates the non suitable areas of the field. After identifying the best 3 locations, We work with the grower to establish which of the 3 locations are best suited for the probe installation based on his knowledge of the field.
Generally we will have one probe per mgt zone, but we can identify the heaviest and lightest soil parts of the field with GPS coordinates and use those to ground truth our probe is necessary.
This is our 3rd year using our 30/30 trial to help quantify how much affect VRI has on yields. We alternate every 30 degrees with a flat rate and a spatially applied water prescription. We can then measure the yield to determine the VRI affects.
30/30 trial by Hastings, NE. VRI isn’t necessarily about saving water although some water savings is possible. Most of the time it’s about redistributing the water. The water we save on the heavy soils is added to the lighter soil. In this field there wasn’t a lot of variably and the flat rate sections. Were not drastically different than the VRI sections for most of the field.Thisspecific trial does not assume much water or energy savings as the average VRI rate for the whole field averages to the same as the flat rate. However, we are optimizing the application and improving efficiency by improved placement of water. Putting more water where it is needed and less water where it isn’t.
In this trial, we added some probes to the system. Here we placed probes in the lightest soil under VRI and under a flat rate and did , the same thing on the heavier soil in both the VRI sections and flat rate part of the field.Same field as above and also why I used this field as the yield results example. In this trial, we also implemented comparison moisture probes. 2 probes in the heaviest soil type (1 in VRI, and 1 in Flat rate), and 2 probes in the lightest soil type. The objective was to show quantifiable results in soil moisture change from VRI.
All though we didn’t drastically change the water on the VRI sections, there was still a considerable difference in water penetration with VRI vsNonVRI. The heavier soil had so much water applied that we pushed water way past the roots to 32” with the flat rate but matched the root zone to water penetration on July 16th but only pushing water down to 16”. VRI saved pumping costs and decreased fertility leaching in the heavier soils.This shows the individual probe sensor results from the heaviest soil type on 1 date or 1 irrigation event. It clearly shows an improvement on an reduced application rate for the heavier soil. The reduced application did not penetrate as deep into the soil profile. We are in the process of summarizing energy savings, but it can be assumed that energy savings will correlate in the same fashion.
In the lighter soils the exact opposite happened. Here we again optimized the water penetration to the root zone by pushing water just 16” deep on light soil with VRI. On the flat rate part of the field water never penetrated more than 4”This shows the individual probe sensor results from the lightest soil type on 1 date or 1 irrigation event. It clearly shows an improvement on an increased application rate for the lighter soil. The increased application penetrated deeper into the soil profile where more of the active crop roots were presently pulling water from. Although this is one application for presentation purposes, similar results were found for the other applications throughout the season. Also had similar results on other fields.
Here you see the actual yields of the VRI and NonVRI sections of the field on each of the 5 EC zones we compared them on. As expected the most benefit was from the lighter and heavier parts of the field vs the middle values.Yield results show overall VRI verse Flat rate for entire field as well as results by individual EC zone. I used this field as an example because it is a good but average overall field improvement (6 bushel increase). The important this to understand when looking at VRI results is that overall improvement is important, but not necessarily where we see our most significant improvements. Meaning, our middle (average and majority) EC/LSC zones should not expect much improvement as they will be receiving similar water rates as the flat rate applications (base rate determinate). We make our largest changes in the lightest soil types (more water) and heavier soil types (less water). It is these areas that should receive the greatest benefit and improvement. The overall field results often average out these zones because of the majority zones in the middle.
By placing the right amount, at the right time and in the right place, we can decrease the yield variability considerably. The irrigated part of the VRI field averaged over 300 bushel. The field to the right of the pivot is a SSDI system. You can see that there were some yield decreases under the drip system. One of the things we like to recommend is that we use our software to help identify the drip zones to more effectively match irrigations to soil texture with SSDI systems too.
Here we looked at what happened to the yields as we put more water on the VRI sections of the field. As you can see more water does not always mean more yield. In this example we were able to reduce the variably of the under lying water holding capacities and maintain optimum yields through all zones.
This slide simply indicates a variable rate wiper pivot scenario. As a pivot walks towards the pivot stop it accelerates in speed. As it walks away from the pivot stop it is slowed down to apply 100% of its needed water, and then simply speeds up as it gets back towards the center of the field. This is designed to allow the pivot to water to the water holding capacity in all areas of the field.
Here is another example of the potential performance enhancement of VRI. On this field the yields were always reduced on the east side do to overwatering on the lower heavier soiled part of the field. After VRI we were able to increase the over field yields and specifically the yields increased by nearly 30 bushel in the area outlines.
In addition we saved 20% on water and the pivot never got stuck all year.
Combining the efficiencies and yield enhancements of VRI to seeding population scripts further increases our growers net return. Here we had nearly a 50 bu variance before VRI, but when we matched the water to the seeding script we reduces the net
The purpose of the next 6 slides is to show how hybrids will react differently to different amounts of water applications, and we can implement trials to analyze hybrid results to determine optimal water rates by hybrid. These trials are more focused on working with the seed companies. However, growers can expect seed companies to provide hybrid water recommendations in the future from the results of trials such as these. It is important for growers to understand that precision water management is a “systems” approach, and hybrid selection and application rate for each hybrid is an important component of that “system”.
This slide represents the results of the Aqua View 3030 hybrid trial results.
Side by side is a another hybrids with the exact opposite results. We are continuing our studies on evaluation yield response to water as it relates to genetics. Look for Aqua View tested tags on your seed purchases in the future and expect water recommendations along with other agronomic management guide lines.
Not all hybrids respond the same to increase water applications. Here is a hybrid that actually decreased its yield as we increased the amount of water we applied with each irrigation.
This slide really indicates what the foundation of our business is. The precision data specialist otherwise known as a PDS. As you can see the Crop Metrics and Virtual Agronomist form what appears to be a roof type design. The data specialist underneath is the foundation. Crop Metrics and Virtual Agronomist are excellent technology, but we need excellent individuals to implement the system. These individuals will build precision ag programs that have a solid fixed foundation so that data can be analyzed for years to come thus allowing growers the opportunity to drive decisions using the data generated from their fields.