Creating a Quality Template
•
1 like•1,580 views
QM Member and Research Colleague, Bethany Simunich, Ph.D., Director, Online Pedagogy and Research at Kent State Online, often shares about her experience with Quality Matters at non-QM events.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
LibGuides Usability Testing: Customizing a Product to Work for Your Users
Presentated at the 2010 Library Assessment Conference. Baltimore, MD. Ray, Lauren and Hungerford, Rachel. (October 2010).
Brian Centeno Continuous Improvement
This is an in depth look at how to conduct an annual review of school plans. Use the slide show feature to see the process unfold.
Introduction to SoTL Fall 2016
This document provides an overview of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL). It defines SoTL as a means to systematically study and improve teaching and learning. The document outlines the basic steps of SoTL, including generating a research question, designing a study, collecting and analyzing data, and presenting findings. It emphasizes starting with a problem from one's own teaching and formulating a specific research question. Examples of SoTL questions are provided. The document also discusses what SoTL is and is not, as well as resources for publishing SoTL research.
Unleashing Analytics in the Classroom
Unleashing Analytics in the Classroom - Using Blackboard Data to maximize your course design and student success.
Research panel
The document discusses the development of a performance measurement system for NAF Academies. It involves creating a self-assessment tool to help academies evaluate how well they implement the NAF model. Student data will also be collected through ConnectEDU to measure outcomes. Surveys of students, teachers, parents and employers will provide additional information. The goal is to establish standards and benchmarks, collect indicator data, and analyze and report data to help academies improve and evaluate the impact of the NAF program.
Duties and responsibilities as Quality Assurance Officer
The Quality Assurance Officer coordinates various internal reviews of academic programs, centers, institutes, research activities, and community engagement. They assist with campus and support unit reviews as well as internal and external audits. Additionally, the officer advises faculties on quality assurance processes, updates program information, communicates standards and deadlines, applies for new programs and course renewals, coordinates student tracking, and advises stakeholders on quality policies and reviews.
Rubrics
This document provides an overview of rubrics, including what they are, their benefits, and how to build them. It defines rubrics as scoring guides that define expectations for assignments and evaluate student performance against clearly defined criteria. The main benefits identified are ensuring consistency in grading, identifying student strengths and weaknesses, improving performance through feedback, and providing qualitative and quantitative assessment data. The document outlines the differences between analytic and holistic rubrics and their advantages/disadvantages. It also reviews the key steps to building an effective rubric, such as identifying standards and criteria, determining task and performance levels, and constructing the rubric.
Customising DMPonline
The document discusses how universities can customize the DMPonline data management planning tool. It describes how universities can add their own templates, questions, guidance, branding, and other customizations. Universities can provide templates tailored for different audiences like PhD students and research staff. Guidance can be added at the organizational or unit level on specific themes or questions. Additional features under development include commenting, answer histories, and APIs. The document encourages universities to define their requirements and provide details to the DCC to customize DMPonline for their needs.
Recommended
LibGuides Usability Testing: Customizing a Product to Work for Your Users
Presentated at the 2010 Library Assessment Conference. Baltimore, MD. Ray, Lauren and Hungerford, Rachel. (October 2010).
Brian Centeno Continuous Improvement
This is an in depth look at how to conduct an annual review of school plans. Use the slide show feature to see the process unfold.
Introduction to SoTL Fall 2016
This document provides an overview of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL). It defines SoTL as a means to systematically study and improve teaching and learning. The document outlines the basic steps of SoTL, including generating a research question, designing a study, collecting and analyzing data, and presenting findings. It emphasizes starting with a problem from one's own teaching and formulating a specific research question. Examples of SoTL questions are provided. The document also discusses what SoTL is and is not, as well as resources for publishing SoTL research.
Unleashing Analytics in the Classroom
Unleashing Analytics in the Classroom - Using Blackboard Data to maximize your course design and student success.
Research panel
The document discusses the development of a performance measurement system for NAF Academies. It involves creating a self-assessment tool to help academies evaluate how well they implement the NAF model. Student data will also be collected through ConnectEDU to measure outcomes. Surveys of students, teachers, parents and employers will provide additional information. The goal is to establish standards and benchmarks, collect indicator data, and analyze and report data to help academies improve and evaluate the impact of the NAF program.
Duties and responsibilities as Quality Assurance Officer
The Quality Assurance Officer coordinates various internal reviews of academic programs, centers, institutes, research activities, and community engagement. They assist with campus and support unit reviews as well as internal and external audits. Additionally, the officer advises faculties on quality assurance processes, updates program information, communicates standards and deadlines, applies for new programs and course renewals, coordinates student tracking, and advises stakeholders on quality policies and reviews.
Rubrics
This document provides an overview of rubrics, including what they are, their benefits, and how to build them. It defines rubrics as scoring guides that define expectations for assignments and evaluate student performance against clearly defined criteria. The main benefits identified are ensuring consistency in grading, identifying student strengths and weaknesses, improving performance through feedback, and providing qualitative and quantitative assessment data. The document outlines the differences between analytic and holistic rubrics and their advantages/disadvantages. It also reviews the key steps to building an effective rubric, such as identifying standards and criteria, determining task and performance levels, and constructing the rubric.
Customising DMPonline
The document discusses how universities can customize the DMPonline data management planning tool. It describes how universities can add their own templates, questions, guidance, branding, and other customizations. Universities can provide templates tailored for different audiences like PhD students and research staff. Guidance can be added at the organizational or unit level on specific themes or questions. Additional features under development include commenting, answer histories, and APIs. The document encourages universities to define their requirements and provide details to the DCC to customize DMPonline for their needs.
"Quality Matters" by Kay Shattuck
This document summarizes Quality Matters, an inter-institutional program for quality assurance in online learning. It discusses factors that affect online course quality, and introduces the Quality Matters rubric - a set of standards used to guide peer review of online courses. The peer review process involves trained faculty reviewers using the rubric to provide feedback to help courses continuously improve and meet quality expectations. Quality Matters is designed to promote student learning and ensure courses are effective, through a supportive collegial review rather than evaluation. Research also suggests Quality Matters can help address community college completion challenges by emphasizing course completion.
Qm for ic
This document provides an introduction to the Quality Matters program and course review rubric. It discusses factors that affect course quality and explains that QM reviews focus on ensuring alignment between course objectives, activities, resources, assessments and technology. The rubric contains 8 general standards and key sections that must be aligned. For a course to meet quality expectations through QM review, it must score a yes on 17 essential standards and earn a minimum of 72 out of 85 total points.
PLUTO Institute: Quality Matters Course Tour
This document discusses the Quality Matters program and its process for reviewing online courses. It provides the following information:
- An overview of the Quality Matters program, which is an online course review program that uses a rubric with 8 standards to evaluate courses.
- PLU is an institutional member of Quality Matters and the Sloan Consortium. The QM review process can result in course certification.
- The QM rubric contains 8 standards for quality related to course design elements like overview, objectives, assessment, resources, engagement, technology, support and accessibility.
- The document reviews PLU's Quality Matters review process, which will utilize the QM rubric standards and feedback forms to provide constructive
North Park Quality Matters Presentation
North Park University is implementing Quality Matters (QM), a faculty-centered, research-based program for quality assurance in online courses. It has trained staff and faculty to review courses using QM rubrics. It offers a online development course for faculty to learn the QM process. Preliminary findings show benefits like standardized reviews, guidance for course design, and peer discussions. Challenges include some faculty not fully utilizing the online tools or meeting standards on first review. Future plans include revising the development course based on needs assessment and improved recognition for faculty who complete the process.
BAETE_workshop_for_PEV_October_2017.pdf
The document discusses a workshop for program evaluators (PEVs) organized by the Board of Accreditation for Engineering and Technical Education (BAETE) in Dhaka. The workshop covers several interactive sessions to help PEVs design assessment forms and schedule on-site visits. It emphasizes evaluating programs based on BAETE's 11 accreditation criteria, with a focus on assessing attainment of program outcomes and continuous quality improvement. The document provides guidance on what PEVs should look for during visits and how outcomes should be assessed to determine compliance with accreditation standards.
Introduction to Online Course Peer Review
This document provides an introduction to online course peer review. It discusses the characteristics and process of peer review, and lists several accepted standards and rubrics used in peer review, including the Cal State Chico Rubric and Quality Matters. The presentation defines online course peer review as an ongoing process for curricular improvement that focuses on online education and involves instructors volunteering their course for review by trained peers based on measurable standards. A typical review takes 4-6 weeks and aims to be confidential, constructive and collegial. The document provides examples of different rubrics and standards used in peer review and questions for participants in the session.
2016 SIDLIT presentation_ FINAL
This document discusses creating standardized course designs across schools at KU Medical Center. It notes that KU Medical Center has schools of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Professions. Standardizing course designs can reduce student frustration, expand enrollment, help with accreditation, and allow faculty to focus on content over format. The Nursing school implemented a standardized Blackboard template, course design, and beginning of semester checklist. Standardization presents challenges but benefits students and allows for continuous quality improvement. Next steps include exploring new content delivery methods and mentoring faculty.
Quality Matters0809
This document introduces the Quality Matters program for evaluating online course design. It explains that QM uses a research-based rubric to assess courses based on best practices. It outlines that courses are evaluated on 40 standards worth a total of 85 points, with 17 essential standards worth 3 points each. To meet expectations, a course must score yes on all essential standards and 72 total points out of 85. The evaluation focuses on course design, not delivery or instructor performance. It distinguishes between course design, which is the planning, and delivery, which is implementation of teaching. Key sections like objectives, resources, assessments, and engagement must be aligned for students to achieve learning outcomes.
Evaluating Distance Education: Focus on Online Course Evaluation
The document discusses quality assurance processes for online courses, focusing on the Quality Matters Rubric. The Quality Matters Rubric is a peer-review process used to certify and improve the quality of online courses. It consists of forty specific elements across eight standards. Courses must meet all essential standards and earn over 72 points to pass review. The document also discusses additional ways the university evaluates its online courses, such as surveys and student practicums assessed with the Quality Matters Rubric.
Evaluation of Online learning
This document evaluates the effectiveness of an online HTML course. It asks questions to determine if the course provides clear grading criteria and feedback, sufficient time for assignments, and an engaging learning environment. The evaluation covers topics like instructor response time, test quality, accommodations for late work, and support services to assess the overall student experience.
CDL conference QM
This document discusses Quality Matters (QM), a non-profit organization dedicated to quality assurance in online education. QM provides a peer review process and rubric to certify the quality of online and blended courses. It outlines the institution's existing course design process and how it will now incorporate the QM rubric standards. Faculty and staff can create QM accounts to access the annotated rubric for self-review or professional development. The institution has a basic QM subscription and will use the rubric for internal reviews but not official QM certification of courses.
Designing Online Courses for Quality Assurance
The document discusses quality assurance, ADA compliance, and Quality Matters standards for online course design. It provides definitions and explanations of these concepts, and describes how the university implements ADA templates and evaluates courses using Quality Matters rubrics to ensure compliance and high quality design. Templates allow standards to be met for accessibility, organization, and support, though some faculty resistance occurred. Benefits include positive feedback and program improvements using the templates and evaluation process.
PDPIE Framework: Online Course Development Quality Cycle
This document introduces the PDPIE framework for quality online course development. It begins with defining quality in education and identifying challenges in online course design related to changing technologies, roles, and standards. The framework was developed based on a review of existing guidelines, interviews with instructors, and a questionnaire on key design elements. The PDPIE framework consists of five phases for quality online course development: Planning, Design & Development, Production, Implementation, and Evaluation. It is intended to provide a flexible yet descriptive guideline for institutions and instructional designers.
Quality, Who Says
The document summarizes a panel discussion on quality assurance programs for online courses. The panelists represented Quality Matters, Texas Woman's University, Park University, and UT TeleCampus. They discussed their respective quality assurance programs and addressed key issues like the impact on faculty participation, study outcomes, the value of the review process, and lessons learned. The document provides details on each program and studies that showed improvements in student learning and satisfaction from applying a quality review process to online course design.
Webinar: Setting The Tone In A Brightspace Course With QM Standard One
Webinar for the Brightspace Teaching & Learning Community
Presenters: Misty Green, Ruth Markulis, Jessica McCarty; all of University of Maryland University College
Title: Setting The Tone In A Brightspace Course With QM Standard One
View the recording: https://www.d2l.com/resources/webinars/setting-the-tone-in-a-brightspace-course-with-qm-standard-one/
Q mat barry
This document provides an overview of Quality Matters (QM), which is a continuous improvement model for ensuring quality in online courses through a faculty review process. It discusses how QM standards are based on research and focus on student learning. The QM peer review process involves faculty reviewing a course using a rubric to provide feedback on how to improve the course. The goals of QM are to benefit students through improved online courses, faculty through professional development and course improvement, and institutions through strengthened accreditation.
Training_Self Assessment Report
The self-assessment report summarizes Indus University's presentation on the concept and procedure of self-assessment reports to Lasbela University. It discusses the importance of quality assurance in higher education and outlines the objectives and components of conducting a self-assessment, including analyzing program missions and outcomes, curriculum, facilities, and other criteria. The presentation provides examples of how to measure objectives and outcomes both qualitatively and quantitatively and identify areas for improvement in order to enhance student learning and meet international standards.
Coordinator lecture saviano
This document provides guidance on improving graduate medical education program management through establishing resident files, program files, and a task management list. It outlines setting up resident files with required information organized into tabs, and program files with documentation for accreditation organized into tabs. It also describes how to create a task management list to better track program activities, with suggestions to include annual education committee topics, key accreditation focus areas, and program/coordinator tasks and reminders. The goal is to optimize evaluation of residents and documentation for quality improvement and accreditation requirements.
M0 orientation to the slo-sso-final
Student Learning Objectives, Mississippi Department of Education, Research in Action, Educator Effectiveness, Assessment Literacy, Assessment, Teacher Effectiveness, Policy
M0 Orientation to the SLO-SSO-DemoSite
This document provides an orientation to the student learning/support objective (SLO/SSO) process. It defines key terms like SLOs, SSOs, standards, and measures. The process involves three phases - design, build, and review - with five steps nested within: developing a goal statement, identifying standards, creating a blueprint, reviewing the template, and evaluating performance. The training modules will guide educators through each phase to design, build, and review high-quality SLOs/SSOs aligned to content or professional standards and measured by performance targets. Online resources provide templates, examples, and supplemental materials to support educators in completing the SLO/SSO process.
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit - NGV Pavilion Concept Design
More Related Content
Similar to Creating a Quality Template
"Quality Matters" by Kay Shattuck
This document summarizes Quality Matters, an inter-institutional program for quality assurance in online learning. It discusses factors that affect online course quality, and introduces the Quality Matters rubric - a set of standards used to guide peer review of online courses. The peer review process involves trained faculty reviewers using the rubric to provide feedback to help courses continuously improve and meet quality expectations. Quality Matters is designed to promote student learning and ensure courses are effective, through a supportive collegial review rather than evaluation. Research also suggests Quality Matters can help address community college completion challenges by emphasizing course completion.
Qm for ic
This document provides an introduction to the Quality Matters program and course review rubric. It discusses factors that affect course quality and explains that QM reviews focus on ensuring alignment between course objectives, activities, resources, assessments and technology. The rubric contains 8 general standards and key sections that must be aligned. For a course to meet quality expectations through QM review, it must score a yes on 17 essential standards and earn a minimum of 72 out of 85 total points.
PLUTO Institute: Quality Matters Course Tour
This document discusses the Quality Matters program and its process for reviewing online courses. It provides the following information:
- An overview of the Quality Matters program, which is an online course review program that uses a rubric with 8 standards to evaluate courses.
- PLU is an institutional member of Quality Matters and the Sloan Consortium. The QM review process can result in course certification.
- The QM rubric contains 8 standards for quality related to course design elements like overview, objectives, assessment, resources, engagement, technology, support and accessibility.
- The document reviews PLU's Quality Matters review process, which will utilize the QM rubric standards and feedback forms to provide constructive
North Park Quality Matters Presentation
North Park University is implementing Quality Matters (QM), a faculty-centered, research-based program for quality assurance in online courses. It has trained staff and faculty to review courses using QM rubrics. It offers a online development course for faculty to learn the QM process. Preliminary findings show benefits like standardized reviews, guidance for course design, and peer discussions. Challenges include some faculty not fully utilizing the online tools or meeting standards on first review. Future plans include revising the development course based on needs assessment and improved recognition for faculty who complete the process.
BAETE_workshop_for_PEV_October_2017.pdf
The document discusses a workshop for program evaluators (PEVs) organized by the Board of Accreditation for Engineering and Technical Education (BAETE) in Dhaka. The workshop covers several interactive sessions to help PEVs design assessment forms and schedule on-site visits. It emphasizes evaluating programs based on BAETE's 11 accreditation criteria, with a focus on assessing attainment of program outcomes and continuous quality improvement. The document provides guidance on what PEVs should look for during visits and how outcomes should be assessed to determine compliance with accreditation standards.
Introduction to Online Course Peer Review
This document provides an introduction to online course peer review. It discusses the characteristics and process of peer review, and lists several accepted standards and rubrics used in peer review, including the Cal State Chico Rubric and Quality Matters. The presentation defines online course peer review as an ongoing process for curricular improvement that focuses on online education and involves instructors volunteering their course for review by trained peers based on measurable standards. A typical review takes 4-6 weeks and aims to be confidential, constructive and collegial. The document provides examples of different rubrics and standards used in peer review and questions for participants in the session.
2016 SIDLIT presentation_ FINAL
This document discusses creating standardized course designs across schools at KU Medical Center. It notes that KU Medical Center has schools of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Professions. Standardizing course designs can reduce student frustration, expand enrollment, help with accreditation, and allow faculty to focus on content over format. The Nursing school implemented a standardized Blackboard template, course design, and beginning of semester checklist. Standardization presents challenges but benefits students and allows for continuous quality improvement. Next steps include exploring new content delivery methods and mentoring faculty.
Quality Matters0809
This document introduces the Quality Matters program for evaluating online course design. It explains that QM uses a research-based rubric to assess courses based on best practices. It outlines that courses are evaluated on 40 standards worth a total of 85 points, with 17 essential standards worth 3 points each. To meet expectations, a course must score yes on all essential standards and 72 total points out of 85. The evaluation focuses on course design, not delivery or instructor performance. It distinguishes between course design, which is the planning, and delivery, which is implementation of teaching. Key sections like objectives, resources, assessments, and engagement must be aligned for students to achieve learning outcomes.
Evaluating Distance Education: Focus on Online Course Evaluation
The document discusses quality assurance processes for online courses, focusing on the Quality Matters Rubric. The Quality Matters Rubric is a peer-review process used to certify and improve the quality of online courses. It consists of forty specific elements across eight standards. Courses must meet all essential standards and earn over 72 points to pass review. The document also discusses additional ways the university evaluates its online courses, such as surveys and student practicums assessed with the Quality Matters Rubric.
Evaluation of Online learning
This document evaluates the effectiveness of an online HTML course. It asks questions to determine if the course provides clear grading criteria and feedback, sufficient time for assignments, and an engaging learning environment. The evaluation covers topics like instructor response time, test quality, accommodations for late work, and support services to assess the overall student experience.
CDL conference QM
This document discusses Quality Matters (QM), a non-profit organization dedicated to quality assurance in online education. QM provides a peer review process and rubric to certify the quality of online and blended courses. It outlines the institution's existing course design process and how it will now incorporate the QM rubric standards. Faculty and staff can create QM accounts to access the annotated rubric for self-review or professional development. The institution has a basic QM subscription and will use the rubric for internal reviews but not official QM certification of courses.
Designing Online Courses for Quality Assurance
The document discusses quality assurance, ADA compliance, and Quality Matters standards for online course design. It provides definitions and explanations of these concepts, and describes how the university implements ADA templates and evaluates courses using Quality Matters rubrics to ensure compliance and high quality design. Templates allow standards to be met for accessibility, organization, and support, though some faculty resistance occurred. Benefits include positive feedback and program improvements using the templates and evaluation process.
PDPIE Framework: Online Course Development Quality Cycle
This document introduces the PDPIE framework for quality online course development. It begins with defining quality in education and identifying challenges in online course design related to changing technologies, roles, and standards. The framework was developed based on a review of existing guidelines, interviews with instructors, and a questionnaire on key design elements. The PDPIE framework consists of five phases for quality online course development: Planning, Design & Development, Production, Implementation, and Evaluation. It is intended to provide a flexible yet descriptive guideline for institutions and instructional designers.
Quality, Who Says
The document summarizes a panel discussion on quality assurance programs for online courses. The panelists represented Quality Matters, Texas Woman's University, Park University, and UT TeleCampus. They discussed their respective quality assurance programs and addressed key issues like the impact on faculty participation, study outcomes, the value of the review process, and lessons learned. The document provides details on each program and studies that showed improvements in student learning and satisfaction from applying a quality review process to online course design.
Webinar: Setting The Tone In A Brightspace Course With QM Standard One
Webinar for the Brightspace Teaching & Learning Community
Presenters: Misty Green, Ruth Markulis, Jessica McCarty; all of University of Maryland University College
Title: Setting The Tone In A Brightspace Course With QM Standard One
View the recording: https://www.d2l.com/resources/webinars/setting-the-tone-in-a-brightspace-course-with-qm-standard-one/
Q mat barry
This document provides an overview of Quality Matters (QM), which is a continuous improvement model for ensuring quality in online courses through a faculty review process. It discusses how QM standards are based on research and focus on student learning. The QM peer review process involves faculty reviewing a course using a rubric to provide feedback on how to improve the course. The goals of QM are to benefit students through improved online courses, faculty through professional development and course improvement, and institutions through strengthened accreditation.
Training_Self Assessment Report
The self-assessment report summarizes Indus University's presentation on the concept and procedure of self-assessment reports to Lasbela University. It discusses the importance of quality assurance in higher education and outlines the objectives and components of conducting a self-assessment, including analyzing program missions and outcomes, curriculum, facilities, and other criteria. The presentation provides examples of how to measure objectives and outcomes both qualitatively and quantitatively and identify areas for improvement in order to enhance student learning and meet international standards.
Coordinator lecture saviano
This document provides guidance on improving graduate medical education program management through establishing resident files, program files, and a task management list. It outlines setting up resident files with required information organized into tabs, and program files with documentation for accreditation organized into tabs. It also describes how to create a task management list to better track program activities, with suggestions to include annual education committee topics, key accreditation focus areas, and program/coordinator tasks and reminders. The goal is to optimize evaluation of residents and documentation for quality improvement and accreditation requirements.
M0 orientation to the slo-sso-final
Student Learning Objectives, Mississippi Department of Education, Research in Action, Educator Effectiveness, Assessment Literacy, Assessment, Teacher Effectiveness, Policy
M0 Orientation to the SLO-SSO-DemoSite
This document provides an orientation to the student learning/support objective (SLO/SSO) process. It defines key terms like SLOs, SSOs, standards, and measures. The process involves three phases - design, build, and review - with five steps nested within: developing a goal statement, identifying standards, creating a blueprint, reviewing the template, and evaluating performance. The training modules will guide educators through each phase to design, build, and review high-quality SLOs/SSOs aligned to content or professional standards and measured by performance targets. Online resources provide templates, examples, and supplemental materials to support educators in completing the SLO/SSO process.
Similar to Creating a Quality Template (20)
Evaluating Distance Education: Focus on Online Course Evaluation
Evaluating Distance Education: Focus on Online Course Evaluation
PDPIE Framework: Online Course Development Quality Cycle
PDPIE Framework: Online Course Development Quality Cycle
Webinar: Setting The Tone In A Brightspace Course With QM Standard One
Webinar: Setting The Tone In A Brightspace Course With QM Standard One
Recently uploaded
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit - NGV Pavilion Concept Design
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docx
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
DRUGS AND ITS classification slide share
Any substance (other than food) that is used to prevent, diagnose, treat, or relieve symptoms of a
disease or abnormal condition
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP Module
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptxMohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
ANATOMY AND BIOMECHANICS OF HIP JOINT.pdf
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Aberdeen
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama UniversityAkanksha trivedi rama nursing college kanpur.
Natural birth techniques are various type such as/ water birth , alexender method, hypnosis, bradley method, lamaze method etcHow to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar KanvariaCommunity pharmacy- Social and preventive pharmacy UNIT 5
Covered community pharmacy topic of the subject Social and preventive pharmacy for Diploma and Bachelor of pharmacy
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
Recently uploaded (20)
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Community pharmacy- Social and preventive pharmacy UNIT 5
Community pharmacy- Social and preventive pharmacy UNIT 5
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
Creating a Quality Template
- 1. Creating a Quality Template in Bb Learn Bethany Simunich, PhD Kent State University Blackboard Never Stop Learning Tour conference
- 2. Overview • Why create a template? • Building in Quality Standards • Common Components • Additional Considerations • Kent State Online Template Walkthrough • Q&A / Discussion
- 3. Why create a template? For students For faculty For IDs/Ed Techs For Peer Reviewers Consistency
- 4. Reflecting Quality Standards Kent State Online Template addresses: QM General Standard 1: Course Overview & Introduction QM General Standard 7: Learner Support (meets all four standards) Standard 8.1: “Course navigation facilitates ease of use.” Institutional standards or QA standards such as those from the Quality Matters Rubric™ Templates can easily incorporate aspects of “Start Here” folders and student support services.
- 5. Common Components for Quality Create placeholders for: Instructor introduction (QM Standard 1.8) Course and module objectives (ensure measurability and alignment for QM Standards 2.1 and 2.2) Consider a syllabus template for: Grading policy (QM Standard 3.2) Pre-requisites (QM Standard 1.6) Netiquette (QM Standard 1.3) Course and/or institutional policies (QM Standard 1.4) Create folders/items for: “Start Here” folder (QM Standard 1.1) Student introductions (QM Standard 1.9)
- 6. Faculty Considerations Choices and Benefits: Consistent Student Experience Module layout options Hiding tools Focus on learning & teaching Shows alignment Saves them time Flexibility
- 7. Support Considerations Consistent Interface: Maintenance Scalability Time Customization Common usability/accessibility standards (UD) Focus on good navigation (standard 8.1)
- 8. Kent State Online Template Walkthrough • Left Hand Navigation • Start Here Materials • Checklists • Show/Hide Text • Module/Folder Structure • Placeholders/Prompts