This document summarizes key aspects of Indian copyright law, including its purpose to promote creativity, the nature of copyrightable works, ownership and rights, infringement, exceptions, and remedies. It also outlines several important copyright cases that help define the scope and application of the law, such as determining what constitutes a "substantial portion" of copying and whether ideas or only expressions are protected.
Indian act on IPRs, CBD, Copyright Act, 1957
The Patents Act, 1970
The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999
The Trade Marks Act, 1999
The Designs Act, 2000
The Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout-Design Act, 2000
Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001
Biological Diversity Act, 2002
Copyright act - Legal Environment of Business - Business Law - Commercial Law...manumelwin
Copy right means the exclusive right subject to the provisions of this Act, to do or authorize the doing of any of the following acts in respect of a work or any substantial part thereof.
Are you interested in patenting your invention but don't know where to start? Patent searching is the first step in the patent application process; it ensures your invention is new and thus eligible for a patent. Learn the 7-Step search process through this presentation offered as part of Milwaukee Public Library's Patent 101 program.
RATIONALE OF COPYRIGHT PROTECTION
What is copyright?
Copyright is a right given by the law to creators of literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works and producers of cinematograph films and sound recordings. In fact, it is a bundle of rights including, inter alia, rights of reproduction, communication to the public, adaptation and translation of the work. There could be slight variations in the composition of the rights depending on the work.
Why should copyright be protected?
Copyright ensures certain minimum safeguards of the rights of authors over their creations, thereby protecting and rewarding creativity. Creativity being the keystone of progress, no civilized society can afford to ignore the basic requirement of encouraging the same. Economic and social development of a society is dependent on creativity. The protection provided by copyright to the efforts of writers, artists, designers, dramatists, musicians, architects and producers of sound recordings, cinematograph films and computer software, creates an atmosphere conducive to creativity, which induces them to create more and motivates others to create.
Is it not true that strict application of the principle of protection of copyright hampers economic and cultural development of the society?
Yes. If copyright protection is applied rigidly, it can hamper progress of the society. However, copyright laws are enacted with necessary exceptions and limitations to ensure that a balance is maintained between the interests of the creators and of the community.
To strike an appropriate and viable balance between the rights of the copyright owners and the interests of the society as a whole, there are exceptions in the law. Many types of exploitation of work which are for social purposes such as education, religious ceremonies, and so on are exempted from the operation of the rights granted in the Act. Copyright in a work is considered as infringed only if a substantial part is made use of unauthorizedly. What is ‘substantial’ varies from case to case. More often than not, it is a matter of quality rather than quantity. For example, if a lyricist copy a very catching phrase from another lyricist’s song, there is likely to be infringement even if that phrase is very short.
Does the law allow any use of a work without permission of the owner of the copyright, and, if so, which are they?
Subject to certain conditions, a fair deal for research, study, criticism, review and news reporting, as well as use of works in library and schools and in the legislatures, is permitted without specific permission of the copyright owners. In order to protect the interests of users, some exemptions have been prescribed in respect of specific uses of works enjoying copyright. Some of the exemptions are the uses of the work
1.
for the purpose of research or private study,
2.
for criticism or review,
3.
for reporting current events,
4.
in connection with judicial proceeding,
5.
performance by an amateur club or society if the performance is given to a non-paying audience, and
6.
the making of sound recordings of literary, dramatic or musical works under certain conditions.
What is the scope of protection in the Copyright Act,1957 ?
The Copyright Act, 1957 protects original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works and cinematograph films and sound recordings from unauthorized uses. Unlike the case with patents, copyright protects the expressions and not the ideas. There is no copyright in an idea.
Does copyright apply to titles and names ?
Copyright does not ordinarily protect titles by themselves or names, short word combinations, slogans, short phrases, methods, plots or factual information. Copyright does not protect ideas or concepts. To get the protection of copyright a work must be original.
WORK
What is a work?
A work means any of the following , namely, a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work
The Proposed Trade Marks (1st Amendment) Rules, 2024BananaIP Counsels
Deadline for Public Comments on New Trade Mark Draft Rules 2024 Ends Today, February 9th, 2024
The Ministry of Commerce and Industry, through its Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, issued a notification on January 2nd, 2024, regarding the draft rules to amend the Trade Marks Rules, 2017. Published in the Gazette of India, this notification invites public feedback and suggestions on the proposed changes.
Read more: https://www.bananaip.com/ip-news-center/trade-marks-1st-amendment-rules-2024-comments-deadline/
Generative AI (GenAI), Business and Intellectual PropertyBananaIP Counsels
The extent of protectability and enforceability of inventions and creations of Generative (Gen) AI is today the subject of discussions and debates among professional and academic circles. While Courts in some countries have decided on protectability of Gen AI, and the role of human intervention required for such protection, several questions remain unanswered. The enforceability of Gen AI also raises several questions at various levels. Read more - https://www.bananaip.com/ip-news-center/generative-ai-genai-business-and-intellectual-property/
If you have any questions, speak with an IP expert/attorney – contact@bananaip.com or 91-80-26860414/24/34.
Indian act on IPRs, CBD, Copyright Act, 1957
The Patents Act, 1970
The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999
The Trade Marks Act, 1999
The Designs Act, 2000
The Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout-Design Act, 2000
Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001
Biological Diversity Act, 2002
Copyright act - Legal Environment of Business - Business Law - Commercial Law...manumelwin
Copy right means the exclusive right subject to the provisions of this Act, to do or authorize the doing of any of the following acts in respect of a work or any substantial part thereof.
Are you interested in patenting your invention but don't know where to start? Patent searching is the first step in the patent application process; it ensures your invention is new and thus eligible for a patent. Learn the 7-Step search process through this presentation offered as part of Milwaukee Public Library's Patent 101 program.
RATIONALE OF COPYRIGHT PROTECTION
What is copyright?
Copyright is a right given by the law to creators of literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works and producers of cinematograph films and sound recordings. In fact, it is a bundle of rights including, inter alia, rights of reproduction, communication to the public, adaptation and translation of the work. There could be slight variations in the composition of the rights depending on the work.
Why should copyright be protected?
Copyright ensures certain minimum safeguards of the rights of authors over their creations, thereby protecting and rewarding creativity. Creativity being the keystone of progress, no civilized society can afford to ignore the basic requirement of encouraging the same. Economic and social development of a society is dependent on creativity. The protection provided by copyright to the efforts of writers, artists, designers, dramatists, musicians, architects and producers of sound recordings, cinematograph films and computer software, creates an atmosphere conducive to creativity, which induces them to create more and motivates others to create.
Is it not true that strict application of the principle of protection of copyright hampers economic and cultural development of the society?
Yes. If copyright protection is applied rigidly, it can hamper progress of the society. However, copyright laws are enacted with necessary exceptions and limitations to ensure that a balance is maintained between the interests of the creators and of the community.
To strike an appropriate and viable balance between the rights of the copyright owners and the interests of the society as a whole, there are exceptions in the law. Many types of exploitation of work which are for social purposes such as education, religious ceremonies, and so on are exempted from the operation of the rights granted in the Act. Copyright in a work is considered as infringed only if a substantial part is made use of unauthorizedly. What is ‘substantial’ varies from case to case. More often than not, it is a matter of quality rather than quantity. For example, if a lyricist copy a very catching phrase from another lyricist’s song, there is likely to be infringement even if that phrase is very short.
Does the law allow any use of a work without permission of the owner of the copyright, and, if so, which are they?
Subject to certain conditions, a fair deal for research, study, criticism, review and news reporting, as well as use of works in library and schools and in the legislatures, is permitted without specific permission of the copyright owners. In order to protect the interests of users, some exemptions have been prescribed in respect of specific uses of works enjoying copyright. Some of the exemptions are the uses of the work
1.
for the purpose of research or private study,
2.
for criticism or review,
3.
for reporting current events,
4.
in connection with judicial proceeding,
5.
performance by an amateur club or society if the performance is given to a non-paying audience, and
6.
the making of sound recordings of literary, dramatic or musical works under certain conditions.
What is the scope of protection in the Copyright Act,1957 ?
The Copyright Act, 1957 protects original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works and cinematograph films and sound recordings from unauthorized uses. Unlike the case with patents, copyright protects the expressions and not the ideas. There is no copyright in an idea.
Does copyright apply to titles and names ?
Copyright does not ordinarily protect titles by themselves or names, short word combinations, slogans, short phrases, methods, plots or factual information. Copyright does not protect ideas or concepts. To get the protection of copyright a work must be original.
WORK
What is a work?
A work means any of the following , namely, a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work
The Proposed Trade Marks (1st Amendment) Rules, 2024BananaIP Counsels
Deadline for Public Comments on New Trade Mark Draft Rules 2024 Ends Today, February 9th, 2024
The Ministry of Commerce and Industry, through its Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, issued a notification on January 2nd, 2024, regarding the draft rules to amend the Trade Marks Rules, 2017. Published in the Gazette of India, this notification invites public feedback and suggestions on the proposed changes.
Read more: https://www.bananaip.com/ip-news-center/trade-marks-1st-amendment-rules-2024-comments-deadline/
Generative AI (GenAI), Business and Intellectual PropertyBananaIP Counsels
The extent of protectability and enforceability of inventions and creations of Generative (Gen) AI is today the subject of discussions and debates among professional and academic circles. While Courts in some countries have decided on protectability of Gen AI, and the role of human intervention required for such protection, several questions remain unanswered. The enforceability of Gen AI also raises several questions at various levels. Read more - https://www.bananaip.com/ip-news-center/generative-ai-genai-business-and-intellectual-property/
If you have any questions, speak with an IP expert/attorney – contact@bananaip.com or 91-80-26860414/24/34.
Guidelines on Film Accessibility in India: Comments and SuggestionsBananaIP Counsels
On 8th January 2024, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MoIB) published a draft of the Guidelines of Accessibility Standards in the Public Exhibition of Feature Films in Cinema Theatres for Persons with hearing and visual impairments (hereinafter “Guidelines”). These Guidelines are expected to be applicable for those feature films that are certified by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) for public exhibition in cinema halls/movie theatres for commercial purposes. The Guidelines were made available for public scrutiny on 8th January 2024, seeking comments and suggestions by 31st January 2024. In response, the accessibility law attorney team at BananaIP Counsels (“BananaIP”) is hereby submitting comments and suggestions for the MoIB’s consideration. The comments and suggestions submitted herein are based on our ground-level experience of facilitating and implementing accessibility standards and are being submitted with the bonafide intent of enabling the MoIB to improve the guidelines based on implementation level feedback.
The views expressed in the submissions are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of BananaIP, other attorneys in the firm, or its clients.
Indian Design Statistics for 2023 By BananaIP CounselsBananaIP Counsels
The Indian Design Statistics Report for the year 2023 has been prepared by BananaIP Counsels as a part of its knowledge dissemination initiatives. The report is based on the information and data available on the Indian Intellectual Property (IP) Office website and databases and is accurate to the extent of data publication, availability, and searchability.
For the latest IP news updates visit: www.bananaip.com
Email: contact@bananaip.com
Indian Patent Statistics for 2023 by BananaIP CounselsBananaIP Counsels
BananaIP is pleased to release the 2023 Patent Statistics Report. This document offers a comprehensive overview of patent activities in India, including publications, examinations, grants, and refusals. It compares data from 2019 to 2023 and includes city-wise patent statistics and performance metrics of various patent offices.
The Draft Indian Patent Rules 2024 has been released for public review. This document primarily addresses the adjudication process for penalties in patent-related matters. It introduces specific roles such as 'Adjudicating Officer' and 'Appellate Authority', clarifying their functions in the patent adjudication process. The draft also details procedures for filing and appealing complaints in cases of patent contraventions.
These updates are part of an ongoing effort to enhance the clarity and efficiency of the patent process in India. Stakeholders are encouraged to submit their feedback by February 1st, 2024.
If you have any questions, speak with a Patent expert/attorney – contact@bananaip.com or 91-80-26860414/24/34.
Patent Examination and Pre-Grant Opposition are independent processes, says t...BananaIP Counsels
In an appeal filed by Novartis from the decision of a Single Judge, the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court considered if a pre-grant opponent would have the right to participate and get a hearing with respect to amendments made by the patent applicant based on directions of the Controller of Patents. The pre-grant oppositions in the case were filed by NATCO and several others, and the Single Judge held that pre-grant opponents have to be heard with respect to all amendments as the patent examination and pre-grant opposition processes merge once a representation is accepted by the Controller. Disagreeing with the Single Judge, the Division Bench held that patent examination and pre-grant opposition are independent and separate processes.
If you have any questions, speak with a Patent expert/attorney – contact@bananaip.com or 91-80-26860414/24/34.
In the case of Huhtamaki Oyj And Anr Vs Controller Of Patents at the Delhi High Court, a significant development has transpired. The focus was on a Polymer Technology patent application titled “An Essentially Biobased Thermoformable Composition And Containers Formed Thereof”.
The application had encountered objections concerning its inventive step and non-patentability. The Court highlighted the need for a thorough examination in the decision-making process.
After detailed reconsideration, it's confirmed that the patent was granted on 26th July 2023. This case emphasizes the critical role of comprehensive examination in the patent granting process and the resilience necessary from applicants.
#BananaIP #PatentLaw #DelhiHighCourt #InnovationProtection #PolymerTechnology #PatentGranted #IntellectualProperty
IP For Business - Presentation by Dr. Kalyan at IIM - Bangalore (2023 Class o...BananaIP Counsels
On August 3rd, 2023, Dr. Kalyan from BananaIP shared insights on 'IP for Business' with the 2023 EPGP class at IIMB. As we continue our journey, we appreciate your interest and engagement with our ongoing efforts.
www.bananaip.com
#BananaIP #DrKalyan #IPforBusiness #IIMBangalore #EPGP2023 #IntellectualProperty #IPInsights #BusinessStrategy #EducationInitiative #KnowledgeSharing
Indian Intellectual Property Cases Report, 2021.pdfBananaIP Counsels
BananaIP is happy to launch the IP Cases Report for the year 2021. This report covers cases related to intellectual property decided by Courts in India, in the form of case notes. These case notes cover important decisions on critical questions of law and fact with respect to various species of intellectual property.
INDIAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY STATISTICS REPORT, 2021BananaIP Counsels
BananaIP is happy to launch the IP statistics report for the year 2021. This report covers Patent, Trademark, Design, Copyright and Geographical Indication (GI) statistics based on information available on the website of the Indian IP Office. Wherever relevant, a comparative review with previous years has been presented in the report.
Findings and Conclusions
At a general level, intellectual property activity before the IP Office increased notably in 2021 compared to the previous year. While Patent, Copyright, Trademark, and GI filings saw an increase in numbers, the number of Design filings dropped during the year.
The conclusion of the report reads as follows:
"To conclude, we observed an overall increase in the IP Statistics in 2021. In the year 2021 number of patents published increased by 2%, the number of trademarks filed increased by 13.78%, the number of copyrights filed increased by 29.71% and the number of geographical indications filed increased by 49.01%. We also observed that the number of patents granted increased by 15.66%, trademarks registered increased by 33.96%, and geographical indications registered increased by 560% in 2021. However, the number of designs registered decreased by 17.54%."
Statistics as Indicators
Intellectual Property statistics have since long been used as indicators of intellectual activity, and the findings of this report signify an increase in innovative and creative activity in India despite the pandemic. The numbers also indicate the importance being given to IP protection in the Indian market by both Indian and foreign organisations.
Talking about the report, Dr. Kalyan C. Kankanala stated, "IP filings in India have been steadily increasing since 2014, and the increase in 2021 is not surprising. What is interesting is the fact that patent, trademark, and other IP filings increased despite the negative consequences of COVID-19.
The increase in numbers is in sync with increased enforcement, licensing, and litigation.
Over the last decade, we have seen a significant transformation in the IP ecosystem in India, and I can today state with confidence that we are no longer a nation that views IP with circumspection."
Attribution
The report was the result of contributions from consulting/strategy, patent, copyright, and trademark departments of BananaIP Counsels.
In this presentation, we bring to you a recap of the IP statistics from 2021 and a comparison of these numbers with the statistics from 2019 and 2020. The data is calculated for the respective calendar years (January to December). It will be different from the data published by the respective offices as they calculate the data for the respective financial year.
Dr. Kalyan Kankanala, Senior Partner, BananaIP Counsels, delivered a class on {inset Slide title}, for National Law School of India University, Bangalore.
Dr. Kalyan Kankanala, Senior Partner, BananaIP Counsels, delivered a class on {inset Slide title}, for National Law School of India University, Bangalore.
Dr. Kalyan Kankanala, Senior Partner, BananaIP Counsels, delivered a class on {inset Slide title}, for National Law School of India University, Bangalore.
Dr. Kalyan Kankanala, Senior Partner, BananaIP Counsels, delivered a class on {inset Slide title}, for National Law School of India University, Bangalore.
Dr. Kalyan Kankanala, Senior Partner, BananaIP Counsels, delivered a class on {inset Slide title}, for National Law School of India University, Bangalore.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
2. Philosophy of Copyright Law
To promote creativity by granting exclusive rights
for a limited period of time.
Quid Pro Quo
Gives a creative work and takes exclusive
rights
3. Generic Life Cycle
Author
Creative Work
Copyright (Exclusive Rights)
Term
Public domain
4. Nature of Copyright
Idea/Expression
Original
Originate from author
Modicum of Creativity
Registration
5. R.G. Anand vs. Delux Films and Ors.
Play - Hum Hindustani
Movie - New Delhi
Hum Hindustani very popular - 1953, 54, 55 and 56
Director came to meet Anand - Anand read out the
play -
Told that he would be informed
Subject- Provincialism
6. R.G. Anand vs. Delux Films and Ors.
Play
Two families - Punjabi and Madrasi family - neighbours - Closely
associated - Amni and Chander punjabi and madrasi families fall in love
- Parents come to know - families relation strained - Girl and Boy
decide to commit suicide - They write a letter - Parents on seeing letter
realize the mistake - Marry them - Everyone happy.
7. R.G. Anand vs. Delux Films and Ors.
Movie
Anand young graduate from punjab comes to delhi - Fights with the girl
'Janaki'- Tries to find a place for rent but people refuse to give to any
one except south indians - Disguises as a south indian and gets a place
to stay - Meets the girl Janaki again – falls in love - Boy's parents come
to Delhi - Girl's parents get to know the identity of Anand - Relations
strained - Janaki decides to commit suicide leaving a letter - - Parents
realize and get youngsters married.
Differences - Provincialism - Marriage - Rent - Casteism - Held no
copyright violation
8. R.G. Anand vs. Delux Films and Ors.
Ideas not protected - Only Expression protected.
It is infringement only if the expression of thought is copied.
To prove copying it need not be an exact copy, It is enough if the
substantial portion has been copied - Substantial similarity in incidents,
scenes and treatment.
Two works showing the same emotion would not be copies unless the
expression has been copied.
Colourable imitation amounts to violation.
9. R.G. Anand vs. Delux Films and Ors.
Test - affect produced on the mind of a person - If the reader,
spectator, person feels that a subsequent work is a copy of the
original.
There can be no copyright in an idea, subject matter, themes,
plots or historical or legendary facts and violation of the
copyright in such cases is confined to the form, manner and
arrangement and expression of the idea by the author of the
copyrighted work.
11. V. Govindan vs. E. M. Gopalakrishna
Kone and another
Compilation of a English - English - Tamil Dictionary
The Appellants copied the dictionary slavishly
Errors, arrangement and words.
For a different purpose but retained words not necessary -
School Dictionary
Dictionary is protectable under copyright - creative
Held - liable
12. N. T. Raghunathan v. All India Reporter
Ltd
AIR came up with head notes to case, which included
important excerpts from the case.
Raghunathan copied those head notes.
Held that head notes are protectable under copyright
law - Copying them is violation of copyright
13. Literary work
Print or Writing Books
Poems
Computer programs
Tables
Compilations
14. Dramatic Work
Drama
Piece for recitation
Choreographic work
Entertainment in a dumb show Scenic
arrangements or acting form - fixed in writing or
otherwise
15. Musical Work
Music
Graphical notation Does not include - words or
action - sung, spoken or performed with music
19. Term
Literary, Dramatic, Artistic or Musical works
Life plus sixty years
Sixty years from publication
Government - Sixty years
Cinematographic work - 60 years
20. Ownership
First Owner – Author
Sound recording and Cinematograph film –
Producer
Employment – Employer
Contract of service
Commissioned work
Valuable consideration
21. Exclusive rights
Bundle of rights
Reproduction
Issue copies
Distribute
Public performance or communication
Translation
Adaptation
Sell or Hire
23. Smt. Mannu Bhandari vs. Kala Vikas
Pictures Pvt. Ltd. and another
Director. Kala Vikas has produced motion picture Samay Ki Dhara’ under
assignment of filming rights of her novel ‘Aap Ka Bunty’.
Author alleges mutilation and distortion of the novel
Movie different from Novel
Consequences of divorce - impact on children
Mother and Father divorce and remarry leaving the child
One character who was adivisional manager in the novel has been shown as a
builder who gets contracts by supplying woman.
The novel shows that the child becomes an orphan but the movie kills him.
Held - No violation of moral rights.
24. Publication
First Publication in India
Published outside India
Author citizen of India
Not Published
Citizen or Domiciled in India - Creation
26. Performer's rights
Actor, Musician, Juggler, Snake charmer, Acrobat,
Lecturer, etc
Term - 50 years
Rights
Make sound recording or visual recording
Reproduce sound or visual recording of performance
Communicate to public
Broadcast or otherwise
27. Fortune v. Devanand
Movie - Darling Darling
Contract that copyrights in performance
belong to Devanand until the agreed 7 Lakhs
is paid completely
Fortune does not pay - Court issues
injunction in seven territories
28. Transfer of Copyright
Assignment or License
Valid only if it is in writing and signed by
assignor or agent
Doctrine of first sale
Reversion of License - 1 year
29. Compulsory License
Copyright Board
Conditions
Published or Performed in public
Author refuse to republish or perform
Not reasonable terms
Withheld from public
31. Infringement
Section 51
Any person
Without license
Owner
Registrar
Does anything that is exclusive right of copyright
owner
32. Infringement
Existence of copyright
Owner of copyright
Copying
Access
Substantial similarity
Look and feel test
Abstraction-filtration and comparison test
33. Bradford v. Sahara
Romance novelist Barbara Taylor Bradford - A Woman of Substance
Sahara TV - 260 PART Television series inIndia
Karishma - Miracles of Destiny - 13 million dollars USD
Servant to head of an international organization
Street sweeper to head of an international corporation
Woman looking back on her life narrates
Idea not expression - Held not liable
34. Educational Book Depot. v. Rabindra
Nath Tagore
Dr. Rabindranath Tagore - Author of 'Gitanjali', The 'Gardener',
and the 'Crescent Moon' - Published by Macmillan
EBT - Intermediate poems for detailed study - 1poem out of first
book - 2 out of second book and - 1 out of the third book
Held infringed and granted damages of Rupees 400
35. Cunniah v. Balraj
Subramanyaswamy - Hindu Deity
Balasubramanya - Younger version of the deity
Appellant made a picture a - Balamurugan
Respondent made a similar picture - Mayura priya
36. Cunniah v. Balraj
Balamurugan
Mayura Priya
Different colour schemes
Large picture and small picture
Peacock faces left and right in the other
Background - Fort and Temple
Court Held colourable imitation of the picture
Liable for copyright infringement
37. Exception to copyright infringement
Private use
Teaching and Education
Research
Criticism or Review
News reporting
Judicial proceeding
Legislative proceedings
Archival for library
40. State of Andhra Pradesh v. Nagoti
Venkatramanan
Video library - VIDEO CITY
90 CASSETTES Seized
Liable for infringement
Have to identify the owner to make some one liable
Fine - Rs. 10, 000