Dr. Kalyan Kankanala, Senior Partner, BananaIP Counsels, delivered a class on {inset Slide title}, for National Law School of India University, Bangalore.
A Design refers to the features of shape, configuration, pattern, ornamentation or composition of lines or colors applied to any article, whether in two or three dimensional (or both) forms.
This may be applied by any industrial process or means (manual, mechanical or chemical) separately or by a combined process, which in the finished article appeals to and judged solely by the eye.
A Design refers to the features of shape, configuration, pattern, ornamentation or composition of lines or colors applied to any article, whether in two or three dimensional (or both) forms.
This may be applied by any industrial process or means (manual, mechanical or chemical) separately or by a combined process, which in the finished article appeals to and judged solely by the eye.
Protection of plant vareities and farmers right act, 2001DNMadhushree1
REGISTERABLE PLANT VARIETIES (slide no.8)
(i) NEW VARIETY is a variety which is not in public domain
> In India earlier than 1 year before the date of filling the application;
> outside India, in the case of trees or vines earlier than 6 years or in any other case earlier than 4 years.
(ii) EXTANT VARIETY is a Variety available in India which is -
> Notified under section 5 of the Seeds Act, 1996; or
> A Farmers variety
> A variety about which there is common knowledge
(iii) FARMERS VARIETY is a variety which-
> Has been traditionally cultivated and evolved by the farmers in their fields;
> Is a wild relative or land race of a variety about which the farmers possess the common knowledge.
(iv) ESSENTIALLY DERIVED VARIETY in respect of a variety (the initial variety), shall be called when it -
> Is predominantly derived from a variety that itself is predominantly derived from an initial variety, while retaining the expression of the essential characteristics that result from the genotype or combination of genotype of such initial variety;
> Is clearly distinguishable from initial variety.
TEST TO BE CONDUCTED (slide no.12)
Every applicant shall, along with the application for registration, make available to the Registrar some quantity of seeds of a variety for registration of which such application is made for the purpose of conduction of test to evaluate whether the seeds of such variety along with parental material conform to the standards as may be specified by regulations.
The seeds samples received by the Authority will be properly tested for its purity and germination. A part of the seed sample will be sent to the test center for conduction of DUS tests and a part of it is kept by the Authority in the National Gene Bank to maintain the seeds samples of the registered varieties for their entire period of protection.
The DUS testing shall be field and multi-location based for at least 2 similar crop seasons. Special tests (laboratory based) shall be conducted only when DUS testing fails to establish the requirement of the distinctiveness.
Provided that in the case of trees and vines there shall be an option on the manner of the DUS testing that a panel of 3 experts shall visit the on-farm test sites for 2 similar crop seasons as may be specified.
The DUS test shall be necessary for all new and extant varieties except essentially derived varieties and it shall be conducted on a minimum of 2 locations. There are special guidelines for the DUS test for each crop.
Trade Related Aspects Of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS)Anjita Khadka
TRIPS agreement covers the following areas:
Copyright and related rights (i.e. the rights of performers, producers of sound recordings and broadcasting organizations)
Trademarks including service marks
Geographical indications including appellations of origin
Industrial designs; patents including the protection of new varieties of plants
Layout-designs of integrated circuits and
Undisclosed information including trade secrets and test data
Dr. Kalyan Kankanala, Senior Partner, BananaIP Counsels, delivered a class on {inset Slide title}, for National Law School of India University, Bangalore.
Protection of plant vareities and farmers right act, 2001DNMadhushree1
REGISTERABLE PLANT VARIETIES (slide no.8)
(i) NEW VARIETY is a variety which is not in public domain
> In India earlier than 1 year before the date of filling the application;
> outside India, in the case of trees or vines earlier than 6 years or in any other case earlier than 4 years.
(ii) EXTANT VARIETY is a Variety available in India which is -
> Notified under section 5 of the Seeds Act, 1996; or
> A Farmers variety
> A variety about which there is common knowledge
(iii) FARMERS VARIETY is a variety which-
> Has been traditionally cultivated and evolved by the farmers in their fields;
> Is a wild relative or land race of a variety about which the farmers possess the common knowledge.
(iv) ESSENTIALLY DERIVED VARIETY in respect of a variety (the initial variety), shall be called when it -
> Is predominantly derived from a variety that itself is predominantly derived from an initial variety, while retaining the expression of the essential characteristics that result from the genotype or combination of genotype of such initial variety;
> Is clearly distinguishable from initial variety.
TEST TO BE CONDUCTED (slide no.12)
Every applicant shall, along with the application for registration, make available to the Registrar some quantity of seeds of a variety for registration of which such application is made for the purpose of conduction of test to evaluate whether the seeds of such variety along with parental material conform to the standards as may be specified by regulations.
The seeds samples received by the Authority will be properly tested for its purity and germination. A part of the seed sample will be sent to the test center for conduction of DUS tests and a part of it is kept by the Authority in the National Gene Bank to maintain the seeds samples of the registered varieties for their entire period of protection.
The DUS testing shall be field and multi-location based for at least 2 similar crop seasons. Special tests (laboratory based) shall be conducted only when DUS testing fails to establish the requirement of the distinctiveness.
Provided that in the case of trees and vines there shall be an option on the manner of the DUS testing that a panel of 3 experts shall visit the on-farm test sites for 2 similar crop seasons as may be specified.
The DUS test shall be necessary for all new and extant varieties except essentially derived varieties and it shall be conducted on a minimum of 2 locations. There are special guidelines for the DUS test for each crop.
Trade Related Aspects Of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS)Anjita Khadka
TRIPS agreement covers the following areas:
Copyright and related rights (i.e. the rights of performers, producers of sound recordings and broadcasting organizations)
Trademarks including service marks
Geographical indications including appellations of origin
Industrial designs; patents including the protection of new varieties of plants
Layout-designs of integrated circuits and
Undisclosed information including trade secrets and test data
Dr. Kalyan Kankanala, Senior Partner, BananaIP Counsels, delivered a class on {inset Slide title}, for National Law School of India University, Bangalore.
Indian Intellectual Property Cases Report, 2021.pdfBananaIP Counsels
BananaIP is happy to launch the IP Cases Report for the year 2021. This report covers cases related to intellectual property decided by Courts in India, in the form of case notes. These case notes cover important decisions on critical questions of law and fact with respect to various species of intellectual property.
Partner Michael Fuller wrote an article for the Bloomberg BNA - Pharmaceutical Law & Industry Report discussing how the PTAB may be taking a more balanced approach in biotech and pharmaceutical IPRs.
On Saturday, May 4, 2013, the Sino-American Biomedical & Pharmaceutical Professionals Association (SABPA) held its 8th Annual Biomedical Forum. The forum focused on career development, entrepreneurship and the latest innovations in pharma/biotech and medical devices industries. The biomedical forum strives to provide an attractive platform for entrepreneurs, scientists, engineers, investors, executives, and policy makers to promote life sciences, biotech, medical device and alliances across the biomedical industry in Southern California and Asian countries. Knobbe Martens Partner Terry Tullis presented on “Commercialization and Patent Infringement.”
Dr. Kalyan Kankanala, Senior Partner, BananaIP Counsels, delivered a class on {inset Slide title}, for National Law School of India University, Bangalore.
Pre-Grant & Post- Grant Opposition to IPRs in IndiaBindu Kshtriya
Patents
Trade Marks
Copyrights
Generic Labelling
Role of NGO to fight for patient’s right against Patent’s Right.
Leading Cases of IPRs that shows ramifications in Indian IPR system.
The Proposed Trade Marks (1st Amendment) Rules, 2024BananaIP Counsels
Deadline for Public Comments on New Trade Mark Draft Rules 2024 Ends Today, February 9th, 2024
The Ministry of Commerce and Industry, through its Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, issued a notification on January 2nd, 2024, regarding the draft rules to amend the Trade Marks Rules, 2017. Published in the Gazette of India, this notification invites public feedback and suggestions on the proposed changes.
Read more: https://www.bananaip.com/ip-news-center/trade-marks-1st-amendment-rules-2024-comments-deadline/
Generative AI (GenAI), Business and Intellectual PropertyBananaIP Counsels
The extent of protectability and enforceability of inventions and creations of Generative (Gen) AI is today the subject of discussions and debates among professional and academic circles. While Courts in some countries have decided on protectability of Gen AI, and the role of human intervention required for such protection, several questions remain unanswered. The enforceability of Gen AI also raises several questions at various levels. Read more - https://www.bananaip.com/ip-news-center/generative-ai-genai-business-and-intellectual-property/
If you have any questions, speak with an IP expert/attorney – contact@bananaip.com or 91-80-26860414/24/34.
Guidelines on Film Accessibility in India: Comments and SuggestionsBananaIP Counsels
On 8th January 2024, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MoIB) published a draft of the Guidelines of Accessibility Standards in the Public Exhibition of Feature Films in Cinema Theatres for Persons with hearing and visual impairments (hereinafter “Guidelines”). These Guidelines are expected to be applicable for those feature films that are certified by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) for public exhibition in cinema halls/movie theatres for commercial purposes. The Guidelines were made available for public scrutiny on 8th January 2024, seeking comments and suggestions by 31st January 2024. In response, the accessibility law attorney team at BananaIP Counsels (“BananaIP”) is hereby submitting comments and suggestions for the MoIB’s consideration. The comments and suggestions submitted herein are based on our ground-level experience of facilitating and implementing accessibility standards and are being submitted with the bonafide intent of enabling the MoIB to improve the guidelines based on implementation level feedback.
The views expressed in the submissions are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of BananaIP, other attorneys in the firm, or its clients.
Indian Design Statistics for 2023 By BananaIP CounselsBananaIP Counsels
The Indian Design Statistics Report for the year 2023 has been prepared by BananaIP Counsels as a part of its knowledge dissemination initiatives. The report is based on the information and data available on the Indian Intellectual Property (IP) Office website and databases and is accurate to the extent of data publication, availability, and searchability.
For the latest IP news updates visit: www.bananaip.com
Email: contact@bananaip.com
Indian Patent Statistics for 2023 by BananaIP CounselsBananaIP Counsels
BananaIP is pleased to release the 2023 Patent Statistics Report. This document offers a comprehensive overview of patent activities in India, including publications, examinations, grants, and refusals. It compares data from 2019 to 2023 and includes city-wise patent statistics and performance metrics of various patent offices.
The Draft Indian Patent Rules 2024 has been released for public review. This document primarily addresses the adjudication process for penalties in patent-related matters. It introduces specific roles such as 'Adjudicating Officer' and 'Appellate Authority', clarifying their functions in the patent adjudication process. The draft also details procedures for filing and appealing complaints in cases of patent contraventions.
These updates are part of an ongoing effort to enhance the clarity and efficiency of the patent process in India. Stakeholders are encouraged to submit their feedback by February 1st, 2024.
If you have any questions, speak with a Patent expert/attorney – contact@bananaip.com or 91-80-26860414/24/34.
Patent Examination and Pre-Grant Opposition are independent processes, says t...BananaIP Counsels
In an appeal filed by Novartis from the decision of a Single Judge, the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court considered if a pre-grant opponent would have the right to participate and get a hearing with respect to amendments made by the patent applicant based on directions of the Controller of Patents. The pre-grant oppositions in the case were filed by NATCO and several others, and the Single Judge held that pre-grant opponents have to be heard with respect to all amendments as the patent examination and pre-grant opposition processes merge once a representation is accepted by the Controller. Disagreeing with the Single Judge, the Division Bench held that patent examination and pre-grant opposition are independent and separate processes.
If you have any questions, speak with a Patent expert/attorney – contact@bananaip.com or 91-80-26860414/24/34.
In the case of Huhtamaki Oyj And Anr Vs Controller Of Patents at the Delhi High Court, a significant development has transpired. The focus was on a Polymer Technology patent application titled “An Essentially Biobased Thermoformable Composition And Containers Formed Thereof”.
The application had encountered objections concerning its inventive step and non-patentability. The Court highlighted the need for a thorough examination in the decision-making process.
After detailed reconsideration, it's confirmed that the patent was granted on 26th July 2023. This case emphasizes the critical role of comprehensive examination in the patent granting process and the resilience necessary from applicants.
#BananaIP #PatentLaw #DelhiHighCourt #InnovationProtection #PolymerTechnology #PatentGranted #IntellectualProperty
IP For Business - Presentation by Dr. Kalyan at IIM - Bangalore (2023 Class o...BananaIP Counsels
On August 3rd, 2023, Dr. Kalyan from BananaIP shared insights on 'IP for Business' with the 2023 EPGP class at IIMB. As we continue our journey, we appreciate your interest and engagement with our ongoing efforts.
www.bananaip.com
#BananaIP #DrKalyan #IPforBusiness #IIMBangalore #EPGP2023 #IntellectualProperty #IPInsights #BusinessStrategy #EducationInitiative #KnowledgeSharing
INDIAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY STATISTICS REPORT, 2021BananaIP Counsels
BananaIP is happy to launch the IP statistics report for the year 2021. This report covers Patent, Trademark, Design, Copyright and Geographical Indication (GI) statistics based on information available on the website of the Indian IP Office. Wherever relevant, a comparative review with previous years has been presented in the report.
Findings and Conclusions
At a general level, intellectual property activity before the IP Office increased notably in 2021 compared to the previous year. While Patent, Copyright, Trademark, and GI filings saw an increase in numbers, the number of Design filings dropped during the year.
The conclusion of the report reads as follows:
"To conclude, we observed an overall increase in the IP Statistics in 2021. In the year 2021 number of patents published increased by 2%, the number of trademarks filed increased by 13.78%, the number of copyrights filed increased by 29.71% and the number of geographical indications filed increased by 49.01%. We also observed that the number of patents granted increased by 15.66%, trademarks registered increased by 33.96%, and geographical indications registered increased by 560% in 2021. However, the number of designs registered decreased by 17.54%."
Statistics as Indicators
Intellectual Property statistics have since long been used as indicators of intellectual activity, and the findings of this report signify an increase in innovative and creative activity in India despite the pandemic. The numbers also indicate the importance being given to IP protection in the Indian market by both Indian and foreign organisations.
Talking about the report, Dr. Kalyan C. Kankanala stated, "IP filings in India have been steadily increasing since 2014, and the increase in 2021 is not surprising. What is interesting is the fact that patent, trademark, and other IP filings increased despite the negative consequences of COVID-19.
The increase in numbers is in sync with increased enforcement, licensing, and litigation.
Over the last decade, we have seen a significant transformation in the IP ecosystem in India, and I can today state with confidence that we are no longer a nation that views IP with circumspection."
Attribution
The report was the result of contributions from consulting/strategy, patent, copyright, and trademark departments of BananaIP Counsels.
In this presentation, we bring to you a recap of the IP statistics from 2021 and a comparison of these numbers with the statistics from 2019 and 2020. The data is calculated for the respective calendar years (January to December). It will be different from the data published by the respective offices as they calculate the data for the respective financial year.
Dr. Kalyan Kankanala, Senior Partner, BananaIP Counsels, delivered a class on {inset Slide title}, for National Law School of India University, Bangalore.
Dr. Kalyan Kankanala, Senior Partner, BananaIP Counsels, delivered a class on {inset Slide title}, for National Law School of India University, Bangalore.
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
3. Interim Injunction
• Prima Facie Case
• Irreparable Loss/Damage
• Balance of Convenience
• Public Interest
Copyright, BananaIP (BIP) Counsels, 2021
4. Example
Pacbo holds a patent over a bottle cap with a sipper for persons with
disabilities. The patent is granted in 2014, and Pacbo sells bottles with the
patented caps in select physical and online stores to both customers with
and without disabilities. From 2012 to 2021, Pacbo's sales steadily increase,
and it sells ten lakh bottles in 2020.
In 2020, Leribis launches bottles with caps having sippers. Pacbo sues Leribis
for patent infringement, and asks for an interim injunction during the
pendency of the case. Leribis challenges the validity of the patent based on
prior use, publication, prior patents and prior sales of bottles with sippers.
Pacbo argues that its caps with sippers are unique as they address needs of
persons with specific disabilities. Leribis states that even if its patent is valid, its
product is covered by prior art and is non-infringing.
Will an interim injunction be granted? What options does the Court have?
Copyright, BananaIP (BIP) Counsels, 2021
5. Example
X holds a patent over an anti-viral drug, which is used for treatment of AIDS.
During the COVID crisis, studies conclude that the drug may be used as part
of a supplementary therapy for severe COVID cases. Until then, X is the only
manufacturer and seller of the drug in India.
Owing to the increased demand of the drug, Y and Z having already
acquired drug approval, start making and supplying the patented drug to
pharmacies and hospitals. X sues Y and Z for patent infringement, and asks
for an interim injunction. Y and Z counter that interim injunction should not be
granted as the demand for the drug is not being met by x. X rebuts by
stating that it is willing to grant a license to Y and Z on reasonable terms.
Will an interim injunction be granted? What options does the Court have?
Copyright, BananaIP (BIP) Counsels, 2021
6. Example
Monsanto holds a patent over a gene sequence for drought and insect
resistance, the process for inserting the same into a plant cell, and the
resultant plant cell, which forms part of a seed. Nuzuveedu acquires a
license over the patent, and sells seeds including the patented invention to
farmers. As per the license, Nuzuveedu is required to pay a license fee/trade
fee at a given rate. After they enter into a license agreement, the
Government introduces price controls with respect to sale of seeds, and
regulates license forms. In response, Nuzuveedu reduces the fee payable to
Monsanto and asks for a refund of the excess license/trade fee payed
earlier.
Monsanto terminates the license agreement and sues Nuzuveedu for patent
infringement. Nuzuveedu counters that the patent is not valid, and that
Monsanto's license terms are anti-competitive and legally untenable.
Will an interim injunction be granted? What options does the Court have?
Copyright, BananaIP (BIP) Counsels, 2021
7. Other Reliefs
• Innocent Infringement
• Declaration of Validity
• Declaration of Non-Infringement
• Groundless Threats
Copyright, BananaIP (BIP) Counsels, 2021
8. Example
X acquires a patent grant over a novel chair, but
forgets to pay the renewal fee. It sues Y for patent
infringement during the lapse of the patent and
thereafter after restoration.
X marks the patented chairs it sells as follows:
"Patented, Do Not Copy."
Is Y liable to pay damages?
Copyright, BananaIP (BIP) Counsels, 2021
9. Example
Zo sends a letter to Yo stating as follows:
"We learned about your patented wheel from the patent database,
and carried out an analysis with respect to our product. Our product
clearly falls outside the scope of your claims, and is non-infringing.
Find the analysis report of our attorney attached. Kindly confirm that
our product is not infringing."
Zo sues for patent infringement, and Yo files for declaration of non-
infringement.
Will Yo get relief?
Copyright, BananaIP (BIP) Counsels, 2021
10. Example
Tom acquires several patents pertaining to traditional
formulations for improving immunity. Through his attorneys, he
sends out legal notices to different ayurvedic companies and
doctors alleging them of patent infringement. Some of them
respond stating that Tom's patents cover traditional
knowledge, and are therefore invalid.
Tom goes to Court asking for a declaration that his patents
are valid. Will the Court grant him the relief?
Copyright, BananaIP (BIP) Counsels, 2021
11. SEP Litigation
• Standard Essential Patents
• FRAND Terms
• Ericsson cases
• Royalty Fixation by Courts
Copyright, BananaIP (BIP) Counsels, 2021