Contoso Corp
Exchange 2010 Upgrade/Migration Project
Presented by
Gil Lalo
Wednesday, 17 November, 2010
 16 years experience as an IT professional
 10 years consulting experience with large
organizations
 MS degree – Information Systems
 Skilled in the design of highly-available, distributed
networks
 Rich background providing IT/business consulting
services in a variety of industries including healthcare,
manufacturing, NGOs, finance, academia, etc
About Gil Lalo
 Enhanced system resiliency: simple yet powerful HA and disaster
recovery functionality
 Compliance, archiving and IRM built in
 Exchange 2010 can run on inexpensive SATA or JBOD disk without
sacrificing performance or availability
 Powerful protection against SPAM and malware
 User self-service features means fewer help desk calls
 Greater support for mobile workers – including support for all major
internet browsers
 Position Contoso to deploy Unified Messaging
 Seamless co-existence and movement between cloud and on-
premise mailboxes*
*once BPOS/Exchange Online is upgraded
Exchange 2010 Benefits to Contoso
 What version of MS -Office is deployed at Contoso?
 What is the OS level on PCs?
 Are the PCs centrally managed?
 Is this an opportunity to deploy Windows 7 and/or
Office 2010 globally?
 What type of connectivity exists to sites C and D?
 How is the company connected to the internet?
 How many remote users?
 How much movement between sites by users?
 Will all role servers be virtualized?
Additional Infrastructure Information
Needed
 What is the desired end result of this project?
?
The Big Question
to be discussed offline
Evaluation Process for Exchange Solution
to Determine Level of Co-existence
Worksheet Sample
 Deploy 2 DAG groups of 4 servers each across both sites
 Create 4 copies of each database and distribute across
servers
 Deploy 8 Mailbox Servers total
 Deploy 4 Hub Servers total
 Deploy 2 Edge Transport Servers in both sites configured
for failover/redundancy using multiple MX records with
equal priority
 Deploy 4 Client Access Servers in an array using Reverse
Proxy load balancing via TMG
Some Specific Recommendations
Balanced Database Copy
Active/Passive for Maximum Resiliency
Server 1 Server 2 Server 3 Server 4 Server 5 Server 6 Server 7 Server 8
DB1 Copy Copy Copy Copy
DB2 Copy Copy Copy Copy
DB3 Copy Copy Copy Copy
DB4 Copy Copy Copy Copy
DB5 Copy Copy Copy Copy
DB6 Copy Copy Copy Copy
DB7 Copy Copy Copy Copy
DB8 Copy Copy Copy Copy
DB9 Copy Copy Copy Copy
DB10 Copy Copy Copy Copy
DB11 Copy Copy Copy Copy
DB12 Copy Copy Copy Copy
DB13 Copy Copy Copy Copy
DB14 Copy Copy Copy Copy
DB15 Copy Copy Copy Copy
DB16 Copy Copy Copy Copy
DB17 Copy Copy Copy Copy
DB18 Copy Copy Copy Copy
DB19 Copy Copy Copy Copy
DB20 Copy Copy Copy Copy
DB21 Copy Copy Copy Copy
DB22 Copy Copy Copy Copy
DB23 Copy Copy Copy Copy
DB24 Copy Copy Copy Copy
Level 3
(4 x 3 x 2)
Level 2
Set 1
(4 x 3)
Level 2
Set 2
(4 x 3)
Site A Site B
Level 1
Set 1
Level 1
Set 2
Level 1
Set 3
Level 1
Set 4
Level 1
Set 5
Level 1
Set 6
Role CPU* Cores* RAM* Disk
Mailbox Server 4 4 32 2TB+
Client Access Server 4 4 32 1TB
Hub Transport Server 4 8 32 1TB
Edge Transport Server 2 4 8 1TB
Minimum Hardware Configuration
*increase by 20% if using virtualization
Conceptual Diagram of Contoso’s Exchange 2010 Infrastructure
External clients connect seamlessly
to cloud-based Exchange
Site A Site B
Site C Site D
Hosted Forefront combines with
on-premise Forefront servers for
two levels of protection
Migrate some or all mailboxes to
the cloud as business dictates
Hub Transport Server
Forefront Server
Edge Transport Server
Firewalled connectivity to the
outside world
Edge Transport Server
Hub Transport Server
Forefront Server
CAS Array
Client Access ServerClient Access Server
Mailbox Servers
Mailbox ServersMailbox Servers
Mailbox Servers
Multiple DAGs Distributed Across Data Centers
DAG1
DAG2

Contoso corp

  • 1.
    Contoso Corp Exchange 2010Upgrade/Migration Project Presented by Gil Lalo Wednesday, 17 November, 2010
  • 2.
     16 yearsexperience as an IT professional  10 years consulting experience with large organizations  MS degree – Information Systems  Skilled in the design of highly-available, distributed networks  Rich background providing IT/business consulting services in a variety of industries including healthcare, manufacturing, NGOs, finance, academia, etc About Gil Lalo
  • 3.
     Enhanced systemresiliency: simple yet powerful HA and disaster recovery functionality  Compliance, archiving and IRM built in  Exchange 2010 can run on inexpensive SATA or JBOD disk without sacrificing performance or availability  Powerful protection against SPAM and malware  User self-service features means fewer help desk calls  Greater support for mobile workers – including support for all major internet browsers  Position Contoso to deploy Unified Messaging  Seamless co-existence and movement between cloud and on- premise mailboxes* *once BPOS/Exchange Online is upgraded Exchange 2010 Benefits to Contoso
  • 4.
     What versionof MS -Office is deployed at Contoso?  What is the OS level on PCs?  Are the PCs centrally managed?  Is this an opportunity to deploy Windows 7 and/or Office 2010 globally?  What type of connectivity exists to sites C and D?  How is the company connected to the internet?  How many remote users?  How much movement between sites by users?  Will all role servers be virtualized? Additional Infrastructure Information Needed
  • 5.
     What isthe desired end result of this project? ? The Big Question to be discussed offline
  • 6.
    Evaluation Process forExchange Solution to Determine Level of Co-existence
  • 7.
  • 8.
     Deploy 2DAG groups of 4 servers each across both sites  Create 4 copies of each database and distribute across servers  Deploy 8 Mailbox Servers total  Deploy 4 Hub Servers total  Deploy 2 Edge Transport Servers in both sites configured for failover/redundancy using multiple MX records with equal priority  Deploy 4 Client Access Servers in an array using Reverse Proxy load balancing via TMG Some Specific Recommendations
  • 9.
    Balanced Database Copy Active/Passivefor Maximum Resiliency Server 1 Server 2 Server 3 Server 4 Server 5 Server 6 Server 7 Server 8 DB1 Copy Copy Copy Copy DB2 Copy Copy Copy Copy DB3 Copy Copy Copy Copy DB4 Copy Copy Copy Copy DB5 Copy Copy Copy Copy DB6 Copy Copy Copy Copy DB7 Copy Copy Copy Copy DB8 Copy Copy Copy Copy DB9 Copy Copy Copy Copy DB10 Copy Copy Copy Copy DB11 Copy Copy Copy Copy DB12 Copy Copy Copy Copy DB13 Copy Copy Copy Copy DB14 Copy Copy Copy Copy DB15 Copy Copy Copy Copy DB16 Copy Copy Copy Copy DB17 Copy Copy Copy Copy DB18 Copy Copy Copy Copy DB19 Copy Copy Copy Copy DB20 Copy Copy Copy Copy DB21 Copy Copy Copy Copy DB22 Copy Copy Copy Copy DB23 Copy Copy Copy Copy DB24 Copy Copy Copy Copy Level 3 (4 x 3 x 2) Level 2 Set 1 (4 x 3) Level 2 Set 2 (4 x 3) Site A Site B Level 1 Set 1 Level 1 Set 2 Level 1 Set 3 Level 1 Set 4 Level 1 Set 5 Level 1 Set 6
  • 10.
    Role CPU* Cores*RAM* Disk Mailbox Server 4 4 32 2TB+ Client Access Server 4 4 32 1TB Hub Transport Server 4 8 32 1TB Edge Transport Server 2 4 8 1TB Minimum Hardware Configuration *increase by 20% if using virtualization
  • 11.
    Conceptual Diagram ofContoso’s Exchange 2010 Infrastructure External clients connect seamlessly to cloud-based Exchange Site A Site B Site C Site D Hosted Forefront combines with on-premise Forefront servers for two levels of protection Migrate some or all mailboxes to the cloud as business dictates Hub Transport Server Forefront Server Edge Transport Server Firewalled connectivity to the outside world Edge Transport Server Hub Transport Server Forefront Server CAS Array Client Access ServerClient Access Server Mailbox Servers Mailbox ServersMailbox Servers Mailbox Servers Multiple DAGs Distributed Across Data Centers DAG1 DAG2