Value of Unique IDs in Academia, Vilnius - Identifying knowledge contributors
1. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
- Identifying knowledge contributors -
Applications of scholarly identifiers in research data publication
Gudmundur A. Thorisson, PhD <gt50@leicester.ac.uk>
Research associate, University of Leicester
Guest scientist, University of Iceland
Participant in the GEN2PHEN Consortium and the ORCID Technical Working Group
-- Overview --
๏ Research data in the life sciences - tackling a problem with sharing
๏ Incentives/rewards, attributing credit
๏ Identifying research outputs, use/reuse and contributors
๏ Emerging solutions & interesting developments
๏ The potentially vital role of ORCID as a central hub and aggregator
This work is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which means that it can be freely
copied, redistributed and adapted, as long as proper attribution is given.
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 1
Tuesday, 14 February 12
2. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Big Science, Big Data
• Scientific research increasingly large-scale and data-driven
• High-profile examples
– High-energy particle physics - experiments
performed in the Large Hadron Collider
– Astronomy - data from ground-based and space
telescopes, the Virtual Observatory (VO)
• Doctorow, C. Big data: Welcome to the petacentre. Nature
455, 16-21 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/455016a
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 2
Tuesday, 14 February 12
3. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Big Science, Big Data
• Scientific research increasingly large-scale and data-driven
• High-profile examples
– High-energy particle physics - experiments
performed in the Large Hadron Collider
– Astronomy - data from ground-based and space
telescopes, the Virtual Observatory (VO)
• Doctorow, C. Big data: Welcome to the petacentre. Nature
455, 16-21 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/455016a
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 2
Tuesday, 14 February 12
4. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Large-scale data guides hypothesis generation
• Science paradigms
– 1st: Empirical - describing natural phenomena
– 2nd: Theoretical - models, generalizations
– 3rd: Computational - simulating complex phenomena4t
– 4th (1+2+3): Data exploration, e-Science
Gray, J. 2009. The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Microsoft Research
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 3
Tuesday, 14 February 12
5. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Large-scale data guides hypothesis generation
Kell and Oliver. Bioessays (2004) vol. 26 (1)
• Science paradigms
– 1st: Empirical - describing natural phenomena
– 2nd: Theoretical - models, generalizations
– 3rd: Computational - simulating complex phenomena4t
– 4th (1+2+3): Data exploration, e-Science
Gray, J. 2009. The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Microsoft Research
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 3
Tuesday, 14 February 12
6. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Large-scale data guides hypothesis generation
Kell and Oliver. Bioessays (2004) vol. 26 (1)
• Science paradigms
– 1st: Empirical - describing natural phenomena
– 2nd: Theoretical - models, generalizations
– 3rd: Computational - simulating complex phenomena4t
– 4th (1+2+3): Data exploration, e-Science
Gray, J. 2009. The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Microsoft Research
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 3
Tuesday, 14 February 12
7. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Biological research also big and data-driven
Richards, M. et al. Paleolithic and neolithic lineages in the European mitochondrial gene pool. American
journal of human genetics 59, 185-203 (1996). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1915109/
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 4
Tuesday, 14 February 12
8. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Biological research also big and data-driven
• Huge technological advances in last 5-10 years
– experimental / observations <-- gathering data with high-throughput equipment
– computer technology <-- storing & analyzing massive data volumes
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 5
Tuesday, 14 February 12
9. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Biological research also big and data-driven
• Huge technological advances in last 5-10 years
– experimental / observations <-- gathering data with high-throughput equipment
– computer technology <-- storing & analyzing massive data volumes
• Example: massively-parallel sequencing
– Determine human genome sequence in <1 day - the $1000 genome
– Metagenomics: sequence *everything* in environment samples
– Large bio-specimen collections
• x100,0000 of individuals in disease/population biobanks
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 5
Tuesday, 14 February 12
10. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Dealing with ‘Big Data’
• Managing & making sense of large-scale datasets
– Data easy/cheap to generate - not so cheap to store & use
– “the $1000 genome sequence, followed by the $10,000 analysis”
• Integration & analysis - combine datasets
– more data of the same type - e.g. combine sequences from multiple species
– related data of different type - e.g. a person’s genome sequence + his/her phenotype
• Potential for accelerating research, creating new knowledge and
(in biomedicine) improving human health.
• Founded on unrestricted sharing of scientific data deposited in the
public domain
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 6
Tuesday, 14 February 12
11. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Data = “fuel” of science
[..] If digital technologies are the engine of this
revolution, digital data are its fuel. But for many
scientific disciplines, this fuel is in short supply.[..]
Smith,V. Data publication: towards a database of everything. BMC Res Notes (2009) vol. 2 (1)
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 7
Tuesday, 14 February 12
12. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Domain repositories for sequence data
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 8
Tuesday, 14 February 12
13. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Domain repositories for sequence data
• GenBank - genetic sequence
repository, established 1986
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 8
Tuesday, 14 February 12
14. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Domain repositories for sequence data
• GenBank - genetic sequence
repository, established 1986
• UniProt - knowledge base for
protein sequence & function
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 8
Tuesday, 14 February 12
15. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Domain repositories for structure data
• Protein Data Bank - structure of proteins,
nucleic acids and other bio-molecules
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 9
Tuesday, 14 February 12
16. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Large-scale genome projects
• The human genome sequence
– International Human Genome project - mandatory rapid data sharing, the Bermuda
principles
• Pattern of variation in the human genome
– International Haplotype Map Project - genotyping population samples
– 1000 Genomes Project - sequencing population samples
• Examples of community resource projects - large-scale data
generation for the purpose of making the data available for broad reuse
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 10
Tuesday, 14 February 12
17. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Data sharing in the “long tail”
• Biology is complex, so data are often very
heterogeneous
• Technologies changing rapidly
• Lots of small research projects
• Lots of small/medium datasets The ‘long tail’ of dark bio-data
• Data in the long tail usually *not* shared
OR not shared in a useful way
• Contrasts with other data-intensive disciplines with
– a long history of sharing research data - a “culture of sharing”
– big, expensive, shared facilities = the only way to do this kind of research
– relatively homogeneous datasets, easier to scale up to big volumes (e.g. telescope images)
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 11
Tuesday, 14 February 12
18. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
The “data sharing problem’ in life sciences
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 12
Tuesday, 14 February 12
19. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 13
Tuesday, 14 February 12
20. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Data
analysed
synthesised
interpreted
Information
published
Knowledge
Publication
Lots of published knowledge but
impossible to to go back reproduce
work and validate findings
Opportunity for maximising the value
of data through reuse is wasted
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 13
Tuesday, 14 February 12
21. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
LOTS of different reasons for not sharing
- No suitable repository -
- Too much work, no incentive for me -
- The ‘My Data’ syndrome -
‘ownership’ vs ‘stewardship’
- My competitors can take the data and ‘scoop’ me -
‘Genuine’ reasons for not sharing freely, e.g.:
-ethical: patient confidentiality / consent
-IP: intellectual property
Koslow. Should the neuroscience community make
a paradigm shift to sharing primary data?. Nat
Neurosci (2000) vol. 3 (9)
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 14
Tuesday, 14 February 12
22. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
LOTS of different reasons for not sharing
- No suitable repository -
- Too much work, no incentive for me -
- The ‘My Data’ syndrome -
‘ownership’ vs ‘stewardship’
- My competitors can take the data and ‘scoop’ me -
‘Genuine’ reasons for not sharing freely, e.g.:
-ethical: patient confidentiality / consent
-IP: intellectual property
Most reasons can be dismissed by referring to
Koslow. Should the neuroscience community make
basic premise of scientific discourse
a paradigm shift to sharing primary data?. Nat
Neurosci (2000) vol. 3 (9)
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 14
Tuesday, 14 February 12
23. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Sharing currently driven by mandates
Journals increasingly require data to be available
“Provide supporting data in a repository OR we
won’t publish your paper”
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 16
15
Tuesday, 14 February 12
24. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Sharing currently driven by mandates
Journals increasingly require data to be available
“Provide supporting data in a repository OR we
won’t publish your paper”
Funders increasingly require data sharing plan &
budget baked into grant proposals.
“Publish data we are funding you to generate OR we
will not fund your research again”
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 16
15
Tuesday, 14 February 12
25. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Sharing currently driven by mandates
Journals increasingly require data to be available
“Provide supporting data in a repository OR we
won’t publish your paper”
Funders increasingly require data sharing plan &
budget baked into grant proposals.
“Publish data we are funding you to generate OR we
will not fund your research again”
Using just a stick
gets you so far
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 16
15
Tuesday, 14 February 12
26. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Sharing currently driven by mandates
Journals increasingly require data to be available
“Provide supporting data in a repository OR we
won’t publish your paper”
Funders increasingly require data sharing plan &
budget baked into grant proposals.
“Publish data we are funding you to generate OR we
will not fund your research again”
Mandates likely to ensure only
Using just a stick
minimum compliance
gets you so far - AND -
often are not enforced
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 16
15
Tuesday, 14 February 12
27. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 16
Tuesday, 14 February 12
28. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Complimentary strategies to encourage sharing
- Make it easy -
- Make it useful -
- Make it citable -
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 17
Tuesday, 14 February 12
29. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Prof Anthony J Brookes
GEN2PHEN coordinator
Chair, Bioinformatics and Genomics
Department of Genetics
University of Leicester, UK
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 18
4
Tuesday, 14 February 12
30. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Researcher IDs in GEN2PHEN
• The aim is to
– create the mechanisms for researchers to get credit for their contributions to scientific
knowledge, even if contributions don’t fit into
* the human-readable ‘aliquots’ of a conventional journal article
* some vague notion of attributing credit by way of position in authorlist
– ..and thereby provide incentives for the kind of thankless work that people now do
without any kind of reward.
• Main use cases being explored
– Research datasets in disease genetics
– Database management and curation
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 19
Tuesday, 14 February 12
31. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Key building blocks: the 3 I’s
Identifying the scholarly work or research output
– e.g. Bell et al. 2009. Science 323(5919) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024357
Identifying use/reuse - measuring impact
– e.g number of full-text downloads for article X first 6 months after publication
Identifying contributors - attributing credit
– e.g. who contributed to highly-cited resource X?
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 20
Tuesday, 14 February 12
32. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Identifying resources - persistent, unique IDs
• The problem: unstable URL references to online digital materials
– http://www.le.ac.uk/~gt50/files/important_data/env2012.dat
– URL decay, tend to have short half-life
• URLs are locators for online resources - need persistent identifiers
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 21
Tuesday, 14 February 12
33. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Identifying resources - persistent, unique IDs
• Articles published in scientific journals
– Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) issued to papers via CrossRef
– Identifier resolves to metadata record, link to current location of content
• Example: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1109-984b => ‘landing page’ on journal website
– Content moves => DOI metadata is updated => stable identifier points to new location
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 22
Tuesday, 14 February 12
34. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Identifying resources - persistent, unique IDs
• Articles published in scientific journals
– Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) issued to papers via CrossRef
– Identifier resolves to metadata record, link to current location of content
• Example: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1109-984b => ‘landing page’ on journal website
– Content moves => DOI metadata is updated => stable identifier points to new location
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 22
Tuesday, 14 February 12
35. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Identifying resources - persistent, unique IDs
• Biological datasets published in digital repositories
– Institutional vs. domain-specific, often offer Handles or other
persistent ID scheme
– DataCite Consortium created in 2009
– to promote the use of ‘data DOIs’
– Data Dryad, FigShare, others
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 23
Tuesday, 14 February 12
36. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Identifying resources - persistent, unique IDs
• Biological datasets published in digital repositories
– Institutional vs. domain-specific, often offer Handles or other
persistent ID scheme
– DataCite Consortium created in 2009
– to promote the use of ‘data DOIs’
– Data Dryad, FigShare, others
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 23
Tuesday, 14 February 12
37. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Identifying resources - persistent, unique IDs
• Biological databases, added-value from expert curation
– No identification scheme - acknowledgement based conventional papers, URLs, names
– e.g. http://www.uniprot.org, GenBank, Database of COL3A1 gene mutations
– The new BioDBCore initiative is building the foundations for a registry of bio-databases
– Could become a kind of ‘journal’ for database resources
– Example persistent resource URI: http://identifiers.org/biodbcore/COL
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 24
Tuesday, 14 February 12
38. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Identifying resources - persistent, unique IDs
• Biological databases, added-value from expert curation
– No identification scheme - acknowledgement based conventional papers, URLs, names
– e.g. http://www.uniprot.org, GenBank, Database of COL3A1 gene mutations
– The new BioDBCore initiative is building the foundations for a registry of bio-databases
– Could become a kind of ‘journal’ for database resources
– Example persistent resource URI: http://identifiers.org/biodbcore/COL
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 24
Tuesday, 14 February 12
39. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Identifying reuse - beyond the Impact Factor
• Reliance on citations and citation-based metrics
– ISI Impact Factor really a way to measure influence of scholarly journals
– Not going away: citation remains the gold standard
• Lots of other use/reuse indicators for impact of scholarly articles
– Focus on the impact of the *publication* itself, not the journal in which it appears
– Indicators: no. full-text downloads, tweets (i.e. mentions on Twitter), social bookmarking
– AltMetrics - a growing grassroots movement “ to better measure and reward all the
different ways that people contribute to the messy and complex process of scientific
progress [..] born out of a simple recognition: Many of the traditional measurements are
too slow or simplistic to keep pace with today’s Internet-age science”
– Lots new tools emerging to explore possibilities in this space
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 25
Tuesday, 14 February 12
40. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 26
Tuesday, 14 February 12
41. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 26
Tuesday, 14 February 12
42. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 27
Tuesday, 14 February 12
43. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Identifying reuse - beyond the Impact Factor
• Reliance on citations and citation-based metrics
– ISI Impact Factor really a way to measure influence of scholarly journals
– Not going away: citation remains the gold standard
• Lots of other use/reuse indicators for impact of scholarly articles
– Focus on the impact of the *publication* itself, not the journal in which it appears
– Indicators: no. full-text downloads, tweets (i.e. mentions on Twitter), social bookmarking
– AltMetrics - a growing grassroots movement “ to better measure and reward all the
different ways that people contribute to the messy and complex process of scientific
progress [..] born out of a simple recognition: Many of the traditional measurements are
too slow or simplistic to keep pace with today’s Internet-age science”
– Lots new tools emerging to explore possibilities in this space
• Key obstacle: access to citation links, downloads, ‘clickstream’ data
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 28
Tuesday, 14 February 12
44. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Identifying contributors - the common thread
[Or: what’s ORCID go to do with all this??]
• Vast majority of repositories and database currently rely on names
for identifying creators/curators/persons in general
=> leads to disambiguation problems
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 29
Tuesday, 14 February 12
45. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Identifying contributors - the common thread
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 30
Tuesday, 14 February 12
46. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Identifying contributors - the common thread
– For content, many different identifier schemes will be needed, because there’s a range of
different types of scholarly content
– For contributors, a single, unified identifier scheme is needed, because a person will tend
to contribute to various types of content over his/her career
• What kind of contribution?
– Conventional authorship
– Analytical, data managing, technical vs. intellectual / scientific, support roles etc.
– Editing / peer-review, incl. future post-publication review systems
• Complications relating to attributing credit
– like High-ener paper, >1000 authors. they’re not really all *authors* are they?
• Intellectual input vs. pure support?
• designed experiment, ran key analysis, technical support staff etc.
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 31
Tuesday, 14 February 12
47. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
• But, wait! there’s many more ways of contributing to science
than publishing papers/data and curating databases!
21st century ‘Digital scholars’ should also be credited for
contributions to...
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 32
Tuesday, 14 February 12
48. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
... Wikipedia articles
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 33
Tuesday, 14 February 12
49. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
... open-source software projects
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 34
Tuesday, 14 February 12
50. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
... distributed analytical workflows + other digital research
objects (published e.g. on myExperiment.org)
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 35
Tuesday, 14 February 12
51. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
• .. and many more!
– future post-publication open peer-review systems
– stuff we haven’t even thought of
• ORCID can potentially have a pivotal role here
– as source of scholarly identities
– as central aggregator & index of data on links between author & content
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 36
Tuesday, 14 February 12
52. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Lessons from social networking domain
• We NOW HAVE:
– Lots of 3rd party applications built around social IDs that users already have on Twitter,
Facebook and other sites
• We WILL HAVE in the near future:
– online scholarly communication tools built around ORCID IDs that scholars already
have
– Rich ecosystem of ‘ORCID apps’
– Lower the barrier to participation - tackle the “multiple profiles syndrome”
• The 1st-generation ORCID central service will support this
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 37
Tuesday, 14 February 12
53. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Technologically, this is not rocket science
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 38
Tuesday, 14 February 12
54. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Technologically, this is not rocket science
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 38
Tuesday, 14 February 12
55. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Single sign-on with social IDs
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 39
Tuesday, 14 February 12
56. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Some points for discussion
• Is ORCID the right way forward?
• International organization with many stakeholders
– Big mass, moves slowly, complex politics, BUT this also gives it ‘oomph’
• The upcoming contributor ID service will be centralized
– Single place to point to when promoting in community
– Developer-friendly: integration app with a single service
• The organization & registry is open (enough)
– Enable reuse & collaboration with others, BUT slices of data will be for members only
• Engaging with end users - scholars to manage their profile
• Journal publishers are involved and committed
– Will be key to adoption via journal article submission, BUT what about anti-OA and
other questionable practices?
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 40
Tuesday, 14 February 12
57. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 41
Tuesday, 14 February 12
58. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 41
Tuesday, 14 February 12
59. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 41
Tuesday, 14 February 12
60. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 41
Tuesday, 14 February 12
61. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
An online identity as a digital scholar,
anchored in a ORCID profile?
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 29
42
Tuesday, 14 February 12
62. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
An online identity as a digital scholar,
anchored in a ORCID profile?
ORCID ID: B-1242-2010
G. Thorisson, Univ. Leicester
G. A. Thorisson, Univ. Leicester
G. A. Thorisson, Cold Spring Harbor Lab.
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 29
42
Tuesday, 14 February 12
63. G. A. Thorisson, University of Leicester / University of Iceland
Acknowledgements
GEN2PHEN Consortium
This work has received funding from the
http://www.gen2phen.org/about-gen2phen/partners European Community's Seventh
Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)
under grant agreement number 200754 -
Prof Anthony J. Brookes Bioinformatics Group, Leicester
the GEN2PHEN project.
Contact me!
<gt50@le.ac.uk> |<gthorisson@gmail.com>
http://www.linkedin.com/in/mummi
http://www.twitter.com/gthorisson
Published under the CC BY license (http://
http://www.gthorisson.name creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Conference on Unique Identifiers, Vilnius, Feb 14 2012 43
Tuesday, 14 February 12