This document discusses conditions and warranties under the Sale of Goods Act in India. It defines conditions and warranties, distinguishes between them, and outlines implied and express conditions and warranties. Conditions are stipulations essential to the main purpose of the contract, while warranties are collateral. Breach of a condition allows contract repudiation, while breach of a warranty only permits damages. Exceptions to the caveat emptor doctrine for buyers are also noted.
Bailment Originated from a French word Bailer which means to deliver . Sec 48 to171 of the Indian Contract act 1872,contain the provision relating to contract of bailment .
Bailment Originated from a French word Bailer which means to deliver . Sec 48 to171 of the Indian Contract act 1872,contain the provision relating to contract of bailment .
Sale of goods act,1930 Act defines a "contract of sale" .pptxsh158aron
A contract of sale may be absolute or conditional depending on whether the transfer of ownership in the goods is to happen immediately or subject to certain conditions being met first. This distinction leads to two types of contracts under the Act:
Sale - Where the transfer of ownership of the goods is immediate.
Agreement to sell - Where the transfer of ownership is to take place at a future date or subject to certain conditions being fulfilled.
An agreement to sell becomes a sale when the time elapses or the conditions are fulfilled subject to which the property in the goods is to be transferred. This distinction is crucial as it impacts the rights and liabilities of the buyer and the seller, particularly in cases of breach of contract or when the goods are destroyed before delivery.
For instance, in a sale, risk typically passes with ownership, meaning if goods are damaged or lost, the buyer bears the loss having already become the owner, regardless of whether they have taken delivery. In an agreement to sell, the seller remains the owner and thus bears the risk until the ownership passes to the buyer.
PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Precedent, or stare decisis, is a cornerstone of common law systems where past judicial decisions guide future cases, ensuring consistency and predictability in the legal system. Binding precedents from higher courts must be followed by lower courts, while persuasive precedents may influence but are not obligatory. This principle promotes fairness and efficiency, allowing for the evolution of the law as higher courts can overrule outdated decisions. Despite criticisms of rigidity and complexity, precedent ensures similar cases are treated alike, balancing stability with flexibility in judicial decision-making.
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
Introducing New Government Regulation on Toll Road.pdfAHRP Law Firm
For nearly two decades, Government Regulation Number 15 of 2005 on Toll Roads ("GR No. 15/2005") has served as the cornerstone of toll road legislation. However, with the emergence of various new developments and legal requirements, the Government has enacted Government Regulation Number 23 of 2024 on Toll Roads to replace GR No. 15/2005. This new regulation introduces several provisions impacting toll business entities and toll road users. Find out more out insights about this topic in our Legal Brief publication.
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY v/s Union of India.pptxshweeta209
transfer of the P.I.L filed by lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in Delhi High Court to Supreme Court.
on the issue of UNIFORM MARRIAGE AGE of men and women.
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Victims of crime have a range of rights designed to ensure their protection, support, and participation in the justice system. These rights include the right to be treated with dignity and respect, the right to be informed about the progress of their case, and the right to be heard during legal proceedings. Victims are entitled to protection from intimidation and harm, access to support services such as counseling and medical care, and the right to restitution from the offender. Additionally, many jurisdictions provide victims with the right to participate in parole hearings and the right to privacy to protect their personal information from public disclosure. These rights aim to acknowledge the impact of crime on victims and to provide them with the necessary resources and involvement in the judicial process.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
Abdul Hakim Shabazz Deposition Hearing in Federal Court
Conditions and warranties
1. Post Graduate and Research Department of Commerce
Commercial Laws
Dr. S. CHANDRASEKARAN
Assistant Professor of Commerce
PG & Research Department of
Commerce
Vivekananda College
Tiruvedakam West
Madurai
3. Conditions and Warranties
Introduction
At the time of selling goods, a seller usually makes
certain statements or representations with a view to induce
the intending buyer to purchase the goods. Such
representations are generally about the nature and quality of
the goods, price, mode of its payment, delivery of goods etc.
When forming a contract of sale. a party may make a
statement with a view to inducing the other party to enter
into the contract. Such statements when made before
entering into the contract are known as representations. Such
representations may be mere expression of opinion or
commendation by the seller of his goods
4. The representations may be a mere
expression of the opinion of the seller and may
not form a part of the contract. But sometimes
these may also form a part of the contract and the
intending buyer may rely upon such
representations. When these statements or
representations do not form a part of the contract
of sale, they are not relevant and have no legal
effect on the contract. But when these forms a part
of the contract of sale and the buyer relies upon
them, they are relevant and have legal effect on
the contract.
5. Condition and Warranty Defined
According to Sec. 12( 1) of the Act, "A
stipulation in a contract of sale with reference
to goods which arc the subject thereof may
be a condition or a warranty". Some
stipulations may be essential to the contract
while some may be collateral or incidental to
the contract. A stipulation essential to the
contract is called a 'condition'. That which is
collateral or incidental to the contract is
called a warranty.
6. What is a Condition? [Sec. 12 (2)]
According to Sec. 12(2), "A condition is a
stipulation essential to the main purpose of the contract,
the breach of which gives rise to a right to treat the
contract as repudiated."
What is Warranty? [Sec. 12(3)]
According to Sec. 12(3), "A warranty is a
stipulation collateral to the main purpose of the
contract, the breach of which gives rise to a claim for
damages but not to a right to reject the goods and treat
the contract as repudiated".
7. Condition and Warranty – Distinction
Condition
It is a stipulation which is essential to the main purpose of the
contract.
A contract of sale cannot be fulfilled unless the condition to it, is
fulfilled.
The breach of condition gives the aggrieved party the right to
repudiate the contract and also claim damages
A breach of condition may be treated as a breach of warranty.
Warranty
It is a stipulation which is only subsidiary or collateral to the main
purpose of the contract
It is not of vital importance, The main contract can be fulfilled even
if the warranty is not fulfilled.
The breach of warranty gives the aggrieved party a right to claim
damages only,
A breach of warranty cannot be treated as a breach of condition.
8. When Condition to be Treated as Warranty (Sec. 13)
A condition is treated to be a warranty and the aggrieved
party has the right to claim damages only and not to repudiate the
contract under the following circumstances:
(a) Voluntary Waiver of Condition (Sec. 13 (1))
"Where a contract of sale is subject to any condition to be
fulfilled by the seller, the buyer may waive the condition or elect to
treat the breach of the condition as a breach of warranty and not as
ground for treating the contract as repudiated."
(b) Acceptance of goods by the Buyer [Sec. 13 (2)]
Under Section 13 (2), "Where a contract of sale is not
severable and the buyer has accepted the goods or part thereof, or
where the contract is for specific goods, the property in which has
passed to the buyer, the breach of any condition to be fulfilled by
the seller can only be treated as a breach of warranty and not as a
ground for rejecting the goods and treating the contract as
repudiated, unless there is a term of the contract, express or
implied, to that effect."
9. Meaning of Acceptance:
According to Sec. 42, the buyer is deemed to have
accepted the goods in any of the-following cases:
(i) When he intimates the seller that he has accepted them,
(ii) When the goods have been delivered to him and he
does any act in relation to them which is inconsistent with the
ownership of the seller, for example, resells or pledges or uses
etc.
(iii) When, after the lapse of a reasonable time, he retains
the goods without intimating the seller that he has rejected them.
(c) By Impossibility
. "Nothing in this section shall affect the case of any
condition or warranty fulfillment of which IS excused by law by
reason of impossibility or otherwise" [Sec. 13 (3)].
10. REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO THE BUYER ON BREACH OF CONDITION
1. If the condition is broken, the affected party may repudiate the
contract and reject the goods.
2. Elect to treat the breach of condition as breach of warranty and
claim damages i.e., monetary
compensation.
3. When the affected party treats the breach of condition as breach
of warranty, he cannot avoid the contract but he is entitled to recover
damage only.
4. No remedy is available when fulfillment of condition is excused
by law by reason of impossibility or otherwise [Sec. 13(3)].
Consequences of Breach of Warranty
Following are the consequences of breach of warranty:
I. The breach of warranty gives right to a claim for damages but not
to a right to reject the goods and treat the contract as repudiated.
2. The buyer may sue the seller for damages. [Sec. 59 (b)].
3. No remedy is available if the fulfillment of warranty becomes
impossible by law [Sec. 13 (3)].
11. Express and Implied Conditions and Warranties
(Sees. 14 to 17)
In a contract of sale, conditions and warranties may be
express or implied. They are said to be express when at the will
of the parties they are inserted in the contract. That is, express
conditions and warranties are those which are entered in clear
words in the contract.
Conditions and warranties are said to be implied when the
law presumes their existence in the contract automatically
though they have not been put into it in express words. An
implied condition or a warranty may be negatived by an express
term to the contrary. It is, however, open to the parties, by virtue
of Sec. 62, to vary the implied conditions and warranties
expressly agreeing to the contrary.
12. Implied Conditions
(a) Condition as to Title [Sec. 14 (a)]
(b) Condition as to Description (Sec. 15)
(c) Condition as to Sample (Sec. 17)
d) Condition as to Sample as well as Description (Sec. 15)
e) Condition as to Fitness or Quality (Sec. 16)
(f) Condition as to Merchantability [Sec. 16 (2)]
g) Condition implied by Customs
(h) Condition as to Wholesomeness
13. Implied Warranties
(a) Warranty of Quiet possession [Sec. 14(b)]
b) Warranty of Freedom from encumbrances
(c) Warranty as to Usage of Trade [Sec. 16 (3))
(d) Warranty to Disclose Dangerous Nature of Goods
14. Exclusion of Implied Conditions and
Warranties
Implied conditions or warranties in a contract of sale
may be negatived or varied by:
(a) express agreement between the parties; or
(b) course of dealing between them; or
(c) the custom or usage of trade.
15. CAVEAT EMPTOR
In the case of a sale of goods, there is a
fundamental principle of law embodied in the maxim
"Caveat Emptor", that is, let the buyer beware. It is not
a part of the seller's duty in a contract of sale to give to
the buyer, an article suitable to, a particular purpose
unless such purpose is made known to the seller.
According to the doctrine of Caveat Emptor it is the
duty of the buyer to be careful while purchasing goods
of his requirement and, in the absence of any enquiry
from the buyer, the seller is not bound to disclose every
defect in goods of which he may be cognizant. As a
matter of fact, it is the buyer's duty to select goods of
his requirement.
16. When a person buys some goods, it is his duty to
examine them thoroughly. As a general rule, the buyer
purchases goods after satisfying himself as to quality and
fitness and, therefore, the buyer purchases the goods at his
own risk, relying upon his own skill and judgment. If the
goods turn out to be defective or do not suit the purpose, or
depends upon his own skill and judgment, and makes a bad
selection he cannot blame anybody except himself. The
buyer has to bear the consequences of his wrong selection
of goods. Sec. 16 states, "Subject to the provisions of this
Act and of any other law for the time being in force, there
is no implied warranty or condition as to the quality or
fitness for any particular purpose of goods supplied under a
contract of sale.
17. Exceptions of the Doctrine of Caveat Emptor
This principle was originated at the time when goods
were mostly sold in the open market. It was presumed that the
buyer was in advantageous position to get the opportunity to
inspect the goods and to satisfy himself as to its quality and
fitness for his purpose. In modern tendency is to narrow the
scope of the rule of Caveat Emptor. These days, trade has
become international in nature and making difficult for buyers
to examine goods beforehand, for example, mail order
purchases. Because of these reasons, it became necessary
to restrict the application of the doctrine of Caveat
Emptor, by proving certain exceptions, which are
discussed below:
1. Fitness for Buyer's Purpose [Sec. 16 (1)]
2. Sale under a Patent or Trade Name [Sec. 16 (1)]
18. 3. Merchantable Quality [Sec. 16 (2)]
4. Custom or Usage of Trade [Sec. 16 (3)]
5. Consent by Fraud
6. Sale by Sample (Sec. 17)
7. Misrepresentation
8. Sale of Goods by Description (Sec. 15)
9. Sale by Sample as well as by description (Sec. 15)
10. Implied Condition as to Title to Goods (Sec. 14(a)
11. Implied warranty as quiet possession apply (Sec. 14(b).