This quick start guide is a reference and resource for public and private stakeholders engaged in improving the system for identifying and connecting at-risk individuals within a community to appropriate health and social services. The target audience includes all those involved in the design, implementation, and financing of care coordination services. For the Pathways Community Hub Guide, go to https://innovations.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/Guides/CommunityHubManual.pdf.
User engagement research final report - final, july 2012Rich Watts
Since March, ecdp has been working with our members and other disabled and older people from across Essex and with a variety of lived experience, to understand how views of health and social care can be effectively captured. In total we engaged directly with 121 people for this work and indirectly engaged with over 470 people and 21 organisations. We also distributed almost 1,000 separate pieces of promotional material to other stakeholders across the county.
This is the final report of this research, which was presented to HealthWatch Essex in July 2012.
For more information, please visit www.ecdp.org.uk
User engagement research final report - final, july 2012Rich Watts
Since March, ecdp has been working with our members and other disabled and older people from across Essex and with a variety of lived experience, to understand how views of health and social care can be effectively captured. In total we engaged directly with 121 people for this work and indirectly engaged with over 470 people and 21 organisations. We also distributed almost 1,000 separate pieces of promotional material to other stakeholders across the county.
This is the final report of this research, which was presented to HealthWatch Essex in July 2012.
For more information, please visit www.ecdp.org.uk
Community mobilization - It is an attempt to bring both human and non-human resources together to undertake developmental activities in order to achieve sustainable development. Community mobilization is a process through which action is stimulated by a community itself, or by others, that is planned, carried out, and evaluated by a community's individuals, groups, and organizations on a participatory and sustained basis to improve the health, hygiene and education levels so as to enhance the overall standard of living in the community. A group of people have transcended their differences to meet on equal terms in order to facilitate a participatory decision-making process.
Resource mobilization - It is the process of getting resources from the resource provider, using different mechanisms, to implement an organization's predetermined goals. It deals in acquiring the needed resources in a timely, cost-effective manner. Resource mobilization advocates having the right type of resource at the right time at the right price by making the right use of acquired resources thus ensuring optimum usage of the same. Thus, resource mobilization could be seen as a combination between:
• Resources – elements necessary for the running of an organization.
• Mechanisms – means which make it possible to obtain resources directly.
• Partners – persons and/or institutions providing resources.
Thus resource mobilization may be defined as: a management process that involves identifying people who share the same values as your organization, and taking steps to manage that relationship.
The Joint Learning Network (JLN) is a key innovation and central part of The Rockefeller Foundation’s efforts to promote universal health coverage (UHC) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) under its Transforming Health Systems (THS) initiative (2009-2017). Launched in 2010, the JLN is a country-led, global learning network that connects practitioners around the globe, in order to advance knowledge and learning about approaches to accelerate country progress toward UHC. The JLN currently includes 27 member countries across Africa, Asia, Europe, and Latin America that engage in multilateral workshops, country learning exchanges, and virtual dialogues to share experiences and develop tools to support the design and implementation of UHC-oriented reforms. The core vehicles for shared learning and resource development under the JLN are technical initiatives, which are managed by several technical partners and organized around key levers for reaching UHC objectives.
California Community Care Coordination Collaborative - September 2014LucilePackardFoundation
The California Community Care Coordination Collaborative (5Cs) is a learning collaborative made up of six regional coalitions serving children with special health care needs (CSHCN) launched in April of 2013. The first phase ended in September 2014, but the coalitions continue to meet. A second phase will begin in January 2015. View this slideshow to learn about the progress, products and recommendations from each coalition.
Developing a cancer plan resource mobilization strategy, IAEA, 2017Anja Nitzsche-Bell
Webinar slides, presented at Master Course: Cancer Control Planning and Implementation, Singapore, March 2017.
Effectively addressing cancer prevention and control is a complex and multifaceted challenge for all countries and the Cancer Control Planning and Implementation (CCPI) Master Course is one of the technical assistance collaborations that was made possible through the International Cancer Control Partnership’s (ICCP) collaborative worldwide network of experts. This presentation introduces national cancer control specialists and policy makers to key concepts and approaches to resource mobilization and strategic planning for national cancer control and covers:
• Planning steps for developing a robust and sustainable RM strategy, including:
– Identifying what is available vs what is needed to address resource gaps
– Mapping potential sources for increased funding/support
• Examples of innovative financing mechanisms
• Recommendations
Well Family as a Life Course Focused, Family Fentered System by Go Beyond MCHGoBeyondMCH
Well Family is a life course focused family centered system that manages and tracks the interaction of individuals and families with programs and services.
WFS enables families, organizations and communities to be more efficient, accountable and successful in delivering quality programs and services that make a difference.
Because everyone matters.
IBM Health and Social Programs Summit, October 2014
Craig Rhinehart’s Blog
Insights from NASHP Conference in Atlanta
Trick or Treating for State Healthcare Innovation Treats
http://craigrhinehart.com
Having worked in the field of reproductive health for more than 40 years, William “Bill” Ryerson is associated with a number of organizations and programs that study population and immigration issues and how they affect the environment. As the founder of the Population Media Center, Bill Ryerson studies a number of research materials, including the Sabido Methodology to find solutions to creating a sustainable environment based on the world’s population.
Integrating Analytics for Value-Based HealthcareEdgewater
Edgewater Healthcare Consulting presented at the Boston Society for Information Management (SIM) with client Southcoast Health on Integrating Analytics for Value-Based Healthcare
The Formula for Optimizing the Value-Based Healthcare EquationHealth Catalyst
Two variables are required in the value-based healthcare equation if it is to add up to a profitable contract. One variable, optimizing the care for the patient population, is commonly included and is a focus for most healthcare systems involved in managing population health. However, a second variable, getting the right dollars in order to care for that population, is often overlooked. And yet this variable is easier to attain. It’s a matter of appropriately assessing the risk of the population by addressing inaccurate diagnoses coding. Here, we offer four methods for solving this variable: identifying high-risk gaps over time, persistent diagnosis tracking, identifying code adequacy, and identifying likely diagnoses.
Community mobilization - It is an attempt to bring both human and non-human resources together to undertake developmental activities in order to achieve sustainable development. Community mobilization is a process through which action is stimulated by a community itself, or by others, that is planned, carried out, and evaluated by a community's individuals, groups, and organizations on a participatory and sustained basis to improve the health, hygiene and education levels so as to enhance the overall standard of living in the community. A group of people have transcended their differences to meet on equal terms in order to facilitate a participatory decision-making process.
Resource mobilization - It is the process of getting resources from the resource provider, using different mechanisms, to implement an organization's predetermined goals. It deals in acquiring the needed resources in a timely, cost-effective manner. Resource mobilization advocates having the right type of resource at the right time at the right price by making the right use of acquired resources thus ensuring optimum usage of the same. Thus, resource mobilization could be seen as a combination between:
• Resources – elements necessary for the running of an organization.
• Mechanisms – means which make it possible to obtain resources directly.
• Partners – persons and/or institutions providing resources.
Thus resource mobilization may be defined as: a management process that involves identifying people who share the same values as your organization, and taking steps to manage that relationship.
The Joint Learning Network (JLN) is a key innovation and central part of The Rockefeller Foundation’s efforts to promote universal health coverage (UHC) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) under its Transforming Health Systems (THS) initiative (2009-2017). Launched in 2010, the JLN is a country-led, global learning network that connects practitioners around the globe, in order to advance knowledge and learning about approaches to accelerate country progress toward UHC. The JLN currently includes 27 member countries across Africa, Asia, Europe, and Latin America that engage in multilateral workshops, country learning exchanges, and virtual dialogues to share experiences and develop tools to support the design and implementation of UHC-oriented reforms. The core vehicles for shared learning and resource development under the JLN are technical initiatives, which are managed by several technical partners and organized around key levers for reaching UHC objectives.
California Community Care Coordination Collaborative - September 2014LucilePackardFoundation
The California Community Care Coordination Collaborative (5Cs) is a learning collaborative made up of six regional coalitions serving children with special health care needs (CSHCN) launched in April of 2013. The first phase ended in September 2014, but the coalitions continue to meet. A second phase will begin in January 2015. View this slideshow to learn about the progress, products and recommendations from each coalition.
Developing a cancer plan resource mobilization strategy, IAEA, 2017Anja Nitzsche-Bell
Webinar slides, presented at Master Course: Cancer Control Planning and Implementation, Singapore, March 2017.
Effectively addressing cancer prevention and control is a complex and multifaceted challenge for all countries and the Cancer Control Planning and Implementation (CCPI) Master Course is one of the technical assistance collaborations that was made possible through the International Cancer Control Partnership’s (ICCP) collaborative worldwide network of experts. This presentation introduces national cancer control specialists and policy makers to key concepts and approaches to resource mobilization and strategic planning for national cancer control and covers:
• Planning steps for developing a robust and sustainable RM strategy, including:
– Identifying what is available vs what is needed to address resource gaps
– Mapping potential sources for increased funding/support
• Examples of innovative financing mechanisms
• Recommendations
Well Family as a Life Course Focused, Family Fentered System by Go Beyond MCHGoBeyondMCH
Well Family is a life course focused family centered system that manages and tracks the interaction of individuals and families with programs and services.
WFS enables families, organizations and communities to be more efficient, accountable and successful in delivering quality programs and services that make a difference.
Because everyone matters.
IBM Health and Social Programs Summit, October 2014
Craig Rhinehart’s Blog
Insights from NASHP Conference in Atlanta
Trick or Treating for State Healthcare Innovation Treats
http://craigrhinehart.com
Having worked in the field of reproductive health for more than 40 years, William “Bill” Ryerson is associated with a number of organizations and programs that study population and immigration issues and how they affect the environment. As the founder of the Population Media Center, Bill Ryerson studies a number of research materials, including the Sabido Methodology to find solutions to creating a sustainable environment based on the world’s population.
Integrating Analytics for Value-Based HealthcareEdgewater
Edgewater Healthcare Consulting presented at the Boston Society for Information Management (SIM) with client Southcoast Health on Integrating Analytics for Value-Based Healthcare
The Formula for Optimizing the Value-Based Healthcare EquationHealth Catalyst
Two variables are required in the value-based healthcare equation if it is to add up to a profitable contract. One variable, optimizing the care for the patient population, is commonly included and is a focus for most healthcare systems involved in managing population health. However, a second variable, getting the right dollars in order to care for that population, is often overlooked. And yet this variable is easier to attain. It’s a matter of appropriately assessing the risk of the population by addressing inaccurate diagnoses coding. Here, we offer four methods for solving this variable: identifying high-risk gaps over time, persistent diagnosis tracking, identifying code adequacy, and identifying likely diagnoses.
The Pathways Community HUB Manual is designed as a guide to help those interested in improving care coordination to individuals at highest risk for poor health outcomes. The Pathways Community HUB (HUB) model is a strategy to identify and address risk factors at the level of the individual, but can also impact population health through data collected. As individuals are identified, they receive a comprehensive risk assessment and each risk factor is translated into a Pathway. Pathways are tracked to completion, and this comprehensive approach and heightened level of accountability leads to improved outcomes and reduced costs. For the Connecting Those at Risk to Care: The Quick Start Guide to Developing Community Care Coordination Pathways, go to https://innovations.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/Guides/CommHub_QuickStart.pdf.
SCALING UP PRIMARY CARE TO IMPROVE HEALTH IN LOW AND MIDDLE INCOME COUNTRIES- ICSF & University of Toronto
Listed Programs are using technology to connect patients (especially those in rural areas) with physicians located elsewhere. World Health Partners connects patients at their franchised providers in rural India with doctors at the Central Medical Facility in larger cities like Delhi and Patna using a video link supported by mobile phone, computer and Internet technology, and remote diagnostic tools designed by Neurosynaptic. Health hotlines are also being
used to connect patients and providers efficiently and affordably, facilitating teletriage, where hotline doctors can let patients know if further investigation is needed and connect them with a static clinic, local labs and pharmacies, if necessary. Mediphone is a health
hotline in India that allows clients to speak to doctors from a private hospital chain who can provide health information and prescriptions via SMS or email.
2016 association for community health improvement conference: summary of proc...Innovations2Solutions
The Association for Community Health Improvement (ACHI) held its annual national conference from March 1-3, 2016. The ACHI
is the premier national association for community health, community bene t and healthy communities’ professionals. This year’s conference was held in Baltimore, Maryland, and centered on discussion around the “From Health Care to Healthy Communities” idea.
The event brought together hundreds of community thought leaders, population health experts and community organizations, in sessions of collaborative engagement and learning. Presentations and interactive meetings introduced and critically discussed the latest tools and approaches to population and community health. This summary provides an overview of some of the key themes and takeaways that emerged from the conference.
Entry Point Mapping: A Tool to Promote Civil Society Engagement on Health Fin...HFG Project
ivil society organizations (CSOs), particularly those working in the health sector, frequently seek opportunities to influence public health policy or share feedback on the quality or accessibility of health services. While these organizations may have important contributions to make, they often are not aware of the most effective and accessible entry points to use. Entry Point Mapping provides a methodology for systemic review and identification of mechanisms, forums and public platforms by which civil society organizations can participate in health sector policy formulation, program implementation, and oversight.
This paper presents an Entry Point Mapping Tool designed for CSOs with advocacy experience and public health officials seeking to expand civil society participation and contains a step-by-step guide for researching and analyzing legal entry points for civil society participation in governance of public health care facilities. Because CSOs have varied interests, the tool includes a series of steps for individual CSOs to determine the level of government at which to pursue their specific advocacy interest and the process of collecting targeted information on legally required points of entry for their civic engagement.
In addition, the Entry Point Mapping Tool offers guidance on analyzing the effectiveness on these entry points and coaches CSOs through the negotiation process of activating or expanding existing entry points, creating new ones, and winning overall collaboration with health officials on improving health policy and service delivery. This tool also documents the experience of CSOs implementing the entry point mapping methodology in Bangladesh and Cote d’Ivoire to demonstrate how the tool can promote increased civil society engagement on issues of health finance and governance.
Engaging Civil Society in Health Finance and Governance: A Guide for Practiti...HFG Project
Governments and international donor organizations increasingly acknowledge the role of civil society organizations (CSOs) in strengthening health systems. By facilitating dialogue between government and citizens on issues of health sector priorities, performance, and accountability, CSOs can help to improve health service delivery and contribute to evidence-based policy. Often, however, CSOs lack the skills and tools needed to engage other stakeholders in issues of health finance and governance.
HFG’s guide provides governments and donors practical advice on engaging civil society in health finance and governance in order to meet health sector objectives and to improve health outcomes. Our guide describes the potential and limitations of civil society engagement entry points and presents an array of tools that may be used to do so.
Focusing specifically on the health sector, the HFG Guide offers practitioners a range of tools from which to choose based on the environment they work in and the objectives they seek to achieve. The guide emphasizes approaches that foster collaboration between public health officials and civil society that can improve access to and the quality of health services, ultimately contributing to improved health outcomes. This guide also seeks to provide practical mechanisms for how civil society engagement may be achieved, at the national, subnational, and community levels.
Interested in sharing best practices within your organization?
Are you engaged in creating community health status reports? Are you interested in learning about how to improve health equity? The Equity-Integrated Population Health Status Reporting Action Framework can help health professionals at all levels identify and implement manageable steps for integrating equity into existing or new public health status reporting processes. The framework is suitable for use by health/public health staff, community organizations that provide local data, and academic researchers.
This framework was developed collaboratively by the six National Collaborating Centres for Public Health, building upon earlier work by the NCC for Determinants of Health.
To see the summary statement of this tool developed by NCCMT, click here: http://www.nccmt.ca/resources/search/240
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada.
NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada.
Evaluating and Improving A Compliance Program EncloseBetseyCalderon89
Evaluating and Improving A Compliance Program
Enclosed for reference is a sample compliance document developed in
2003 by a Task Force assigned by the Health Care Compliance Association.
It was developed as a resource for evaluating and improving a compliance
program for Health Care Executives and Compliance Officers.
The Society of Corporate Compliance & Ethics
HEALTH CARE
COMPLIANCE
ASSOCIATION
5780 Lincoln Drive · Suite 120 · Minneapolis, MN 55436 · 888/580-8373 · www.hcca-info.org
January 24, 2003
Dear HCCA Colleagues:
On behalf of the HCCA Board of Directors and the many volunteers from across the country who served on the
HCCA Compliance Performance Measurement Initiative Task Force and its Steering and Drafting Committees,
we are pleased to announce the release of the following document, “Evaluating and Improving a Compliance
Program, A Resource for Health care Board Members, Health care Executives and Compliance Officers.”
This resource is now available to all HCCA members and other interested parties on the public section of the
HCCA website at www.hcca-info.org.
This document is the product of an extensive collaborative process and reflects hundreds of volunteer hours of
research, meetings, drafting, collaborative discussions, decades of collective professional experience, as well as
the important feedback received from the HCCA membership through surveys, interactions at meetings and
finally, through comments received during a 45-day review and comment period.
We trust that this document will provide added value by identifying and sharing information and best practices
regarding the operation and evaluation of compliance programs. While principally developed for the benefit of
HCCA members, this reference is intended to be a useful guide to all health care compliance professionals.
Nevertheless, it is important to note that this document is not intended nor should it be used as a “cookbook” or
“list of standards.” One size certainly does not fit all. As a reference, you should use and tailor this information
to meet the specific needs of your organization and to better inform your board members, senior management and
executives.
This document will also serve as the foundation for the next steps in HCCA’s continued efforts to provide
practical tools to you, our members, to assess the performance of compliance programs within health care
organizations. Recognizing the complexity and variety of compliance issues within different health care industry
sectors, the HCCA Board has assigned the task of developing specific performance measurement tools for
different health care industry sectors to the HCCA Compliance Focus Groups (CFG’s), e.g., Health Systems CFG,
Home Health CFG, Pharmaceutical CFG, etc. The CFG’s will provide an appropriate and useful forum to attract
volunteers and their ideas to tailor and customize these tools to fit specific industry secto ...
Accountability, Health Governance, and Health Systems: Uncovering the LinkagesHFG Project
This report presents findings and analysis related to accountability, its connections to health governance, and links to health system performance. As part of a series on governance interventions that contribute to health system performance, this report aims to increase awareness and understanding of the evidence of what works and why. The report categorizes and reviews evidence from the literature, further informed by several technical experts across a several types of accountability interventions.
Public Financial Management, Health Governance, and Health SystemsHFG Project
While the importance of governance in a health system is well recognized, there is an overall lack of evidence and understanding of the dynamics of how improved governance can influence health system performance and health outcomes. There is still considerable debate on which governance interventions are appropriate for different contexts. This lack of evidence can result in avoidance of health governance efforts or an over-reliance on a limited set of governance interventions. As development partners and governments are increasing their emphasis on improving accountability and transparency of health systems and strengthening country policies and institutions to move towards universal health coverage (UHC), the need of this evidence is ever rising.
To address this evidence gap, the USAID’s Office of Health Systems (USAID/GH/OHS), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the Health Finance and Governance (HFG) Project launched an initiative in September 2016 to ‘Marshall the Evidence’ on how governance contributes to health system performance and improves health outcomes.
The overall objective of the initiative was to increase awareness and understanding of the evidence of what works and why in how governance contributes to health system performance, and how the field of health governance is evolving at the country level. This report provides a synthesis of the findings across the four themes. This report presents the findings of the Public Financial Management.
Public health approaches combine top down campaigns and bottom up efforts in organizing the efforts of society to create the conditions for health. These collaborative efforts in social
organization cross multiple sectors and make strengthening public health practice one of the best ways to pursue all 17 of the Sustainable Development Goals. Furthermore, the concept of Universal Health Coverage includes coverage with effective public health practice.
Governing Quality in Health Care on the Path to Universal Health Coverage: A ...HFG Project
As countries work to promote and achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC), maintaining and improving quality in health care is emerging as a priority. While research has been conducted on service delivery and financing schemes for UHC, little consolidated knowledge or guidance is available on institutional arrangements and their impact on quality of care in the context of UHC.
Responding to this need, the HFG project conducted a literature review to attempt to document global experience in institutional roles and relationships governing quality of care in the health sector, and to identify successful features or factors when structuring institutional roles, responsibilities, and relationships.
This document for communities and hospitals contains examples of successful partnerships, information about new models of care, and tips for making the case to hospitals for funding and support for population health work.
The Smart Health Centers project places trained health information specialists (Navigators) in traditional and non-traditional health facilities to assist patients in connecting to their own medical records and find reliable information about their own conditions. All Navigators are trained in the Smart Health Center Model using this training guide.
Similar to Connecting Those at Risk to Care: The Quick Start Guide to Developing Community Care Coordination Pathways (20)
This report presents a summary and findings from an April 2012 event entitled Million Hearts™ Scaling and Spreading Innovation: Strategies to Improve Cardiovascular Health, sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)’s Health Care Innovations Exchange, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), in partnership with the American Heart Association. The event generated valuable findings for the emerging field of scaling and spreading innovation.
AHRQ's Health Care Innovations Exchange held a Web Seminar on Linking Clinical Care and Communities for Improved Prevention on September 1, 2011. For more information, visit https://innovations.ahrq.gov/events/2011/09/linking-clinical-care-and-communities-improved-prevention.
AHRQ’s Health Care Innovations Exchange held a Web event on Innovative Health Care Policies: Using ACO Principles and Financial Incentives to Improve Health Outcomes on January 29, 2013. For more information, visit https://innovations.ahrq.gov/events/2013/01/innovative-policies-using-aco-principles-and-financial-incentives-improve-health.
AHRQ’s Health Care Innovations Exchange held a Web event on Promoting the Spread of Health Care Innovations on April 9, 2013. For more information, visit https://innovations.ahrq.gov/events/2013/04/promoting-spread-health-care-innovations.
On June 5, 2013, the Innovations Exchange held a Web event titled Building Health Information Exchanges To Support ACOs and Medical Homes: Delaware’s Experience. This was the third Web event in a three-part series designed to share novel experiences and lessons learned in putting accountable care organization (ACO) and patient-centered medical home (PCMH) principles into practice. For more information, visit https://innovations.ahrq.gov/events/2013/06/building-health-information-exchanges-support-acos-and-medical-homes-delawares.
On August 7, 2013, AHRQ hosted a special Web event that provided an overview of recent efforts focused on the area of clinical−community relationships, including an in-depth look at two new tools designed to support research and evaluation in the field: the Clinical−Community Relationship Measures (CCRM) Atlas and the Clinical−Community Relationships Evaluation Roadmap. For more information, visit https://innovations.ahrq.gov/events/2013/08/clinical-community-relationships-pathway-improve-health-tools-research-and-evaluation.
The Guide helps users determine if an innovation would be a good fit—or an appropriate stretch—for their health care organization by asking a series of questions. It links users to actionable Web-based tools and presents case studies that illustrate how other organizations have addressed these questions. For more information, visit https://innovations.ahrq.gov/guide/guideTOC.
More from AHRQ Health Care Innovations Exchange (7)
Explore our infographic on 'Essential Metrics for Palliative Care Management' which highlights key performance indicators crucial for enhancing the quality and efficiency of palliative care services.
This visual guide breaks down important metrics across four categories: Patient-Centered Metrics, Care Efficiency Metrics, Quality of Life Metrics, and Staff Metrics. Each section is designed to help healthcare professionals monitor and improve care delivery for patients facing serious illnesses. Understand how to implement these metrics in your palliative care practices for better outcomes and higher satisfaction levels.
Navigating Challenges: Mental Health, Legislation, and the Prison System in B...Guillermo Rivera
This conference will delve into the intricate intersections between mental health, legal frameworks, and the prison system in Bolivia. It aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current challenges faced by mental health professionals working within the legislative and correctional landscapes. Topics of discussion will include the prevalence and impact of mental health issues among the incarcerated population, the effectiveness of existing mental health policies and legislation, and potential reforms to enhance the mental health support system within prisons.
The Importance of Community Nursing Care.pdfAD Healthcare
NDIS and Community 24/7 Nursing Care is a specific type of support that may be provided under the NDIS for individuals with complex medical needs who require ongoing nursing care in a community setting, such as their home or a supported accommodation facility.
Antibiotic Stewardship by Anushri Srivastava.pptxAnushriSrivastav
Stewardship is the act of taking good care of something.
Antimicrobial stewardship is a coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antimicrobials (including antibiotics), improves patient outcomes, reduces microbial resistance, and decreases the spread of infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms.
WHO launched the Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) in 2015 to fill knowledge gaps and inform strategies at all levels.
ACCORDING TO apic.org,
Antimicrobial stewardship is a coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antimicrobials (including antibiotics), improves patient outcomes, reduces microbial resistance, and decreases the spread of infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms.
ACCORDING TO pewtrusts.org,
Antibiotic stewardship refers to efforts in doctors’ offices, hospitals, long term care facilities, and other health care settings to ensure that antibiotics are used only when necessary and appropriate
According to WHO,
Antimicrobial stewardship is a systematic approach to educate and support health care professionals to follow evidence-based guidelines for prescribing and administering antimicrobials
In 1996, John McGowan and Dale Gerding first applied the term antimicrobial stewardship, where they suggested a causal association between antimicrobial agent use and resistance. They also focused on the urgency of large-scale controlled trials of antimicrobial-use regulation employing sophisticated epidemiologic methods, molecular typing, and precise resistance mechanism analysis.
Antimicrobial Stewardship(AMS) refers to the optimal selection, dosing, and duration of antimicrobial treatment resulting in the best clinical outcome with minimal side effects to the patients and minimal impact on subsequent resistance.
According to the 2019 report, in the US, more than 2.8 million antibiotic-resistant infections occur each year, and more than 35000 people die. In addition to this, it also mentioned that 223,900 cases of Clostridoides difficile occurred in 2017, of which 12800 people died. The report did not include viruses or parasites
VISION
Being proactive
Supporting optimal animal and human health
Exploring ways to reduce overall use of antimicrobials
Using the drugs that prevent and treat disease by killing microscopic organisms in a responsible way
GOAL
to prevent the generation and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Doing so will preserve the effectiveness of these drugs in animals and humans for years to come.
being to preserve human and animal health and the effectiveness of antimicrobial medications.
to implement a multidisciplinary approach in assembling a stewardship team to include an infectious disease physician, a clinical pharmacist with infectious diseases training, infection preventionist, and a close collaboration with the staff in the clinical microbiology laboratory
to prevent antimicrobial overuse, misuse and abuse.
to minimize the developme
One of the most developed cities of India, the city of Chennai is the capital of Tamilnadu and many people from different parts of India come here to earn their bread and butter. Being a metropolitan, the city is filled with towering building and beaches but the sad part as with almost every Indian city
Deep Leg Vein Thrombosis (DVT): Meaning, Causes, Symptoms, Treatment, and Mor...The Lifesciences Magazine
Deep Leg Vein Thrombosis occurs when a blood clot forms in one or more of the deep veins in the legs. These clots can impede blood flow, leading to severe complications.
CHAPTER 1 SEMESTER V PREVENTIVE-PEDIATRICS.pdfSachin Sharma
This content provides an overview of preventive pediatrics. It defines preventive pediatrics as preventing disease and promoting children's physical, mental, and social well-being to achieve positive health. It discusses antenatal, postnatal, and social preventive pediatrics. It also covers various child health programs like immunization, breastfeeding, ICDS, and the roles of organizations like WHO, UNICEF, and nurses in preventive pediatrics.
Leading the Way in Nephrology: Dr. David Greene's Work with Stem Cells for Ki...Dr. David Greene Arizona
As we watch Dr. Greene's continued efforts and research in Arizona, it's clear that stem cell therapy holds a promising key to unlocking new doors in the treatment of kidney disease. With each study and trial, we step closer to a world where kidney disease is no longer a life sentence but a treatable condition, thanks to pioneers like Dr. David Greene.
India Clinical Trials Market: Industry Size and Growth Trends [2030] Analyzed...Kumar Satyam
According to TechSci Research report, "India Clinical Trials Market- By Region, Competition, Forecast & Opportunities, 2030F," the India Clinical Trials Market was valued at USD 2.05 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.64% through 2030. The market is driven by a variety of factors, making India an attractive destination for pharmaceutical companies and researchers. India's vast and diverse patient population, cost-effective operational environment, and a large pool of skilled medical professionals contribute significantly to the market's growth. Additionally, increasing government support in streamlining regulations and the growing prevalence of lifestyle diseases further propel the clinical trials market.
Growing Prevalence of Lifestyle Diseases
The rising incidence of lifestyle diseases such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer is a major trend driving the clinical trials market in India. These conditions necessitate the development and testing of new treatment methods, creating a robust demand for clinical trials. The increasing burden of these diseases highlights the need for innovative therapies and underscores the importance of India as a key player in global clinical research.
India Clinical Trials Market: Industry Size and Growth Trends [2030] Analyzed...
Connecting Those at Risk to Care: The Quick Start Guide to Developing Community Care Coordination Pathways
1. A
Connecting Those
at Risk to Care
The Quick Start Guide to Developing
Community Care Coordination Pathways
2.
3. Connecting Those
at Risk to Care
The Quick Start Guide to Developing
Community Care Coordination Pathways
A Companion to the Pathways Community
HUB Manual
Prepared for:
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
5600 Fishers Lane
Rockville, MD 20857
www.ahrq.gov
Developed by:
Community Care Coordination Learning Network–The Pathways Community HUB Institute
AHRQ Publication No. 15(16)-0070-1-EF
January 2016
4. ii
This document is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without special permission.
Citation of the source is appreciated.
Suggested citation:
Pathways Community HUB Institute, Community Care Coordination Learning Network. Connecting
those at risk to care: the quick start guide to developing community care coordination pathways. A
companion to the Pathways Community Hub Manual. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality (AHRQ); January 2016. AHRQ Publication No. 15(16)-0070-1-EF.
The information in the Connecting Those at Risk to Care quick start guide is intended to assist
community care coordination initiatives in identifying at-risk individuals, clarifying their risk
factors, and then ensuring risk factors are addressed using pathways and a pay-for-performance
methodology. This guide is intended as a reference and not as a substitute for professional
judgment. The findings and conclusions are those of the authors, who are responsible for its
content, and do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. No statement in this guide should be
construed as an official position of AHRQ or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
In addition, AHRQ or U.S. Department of Health and Human Services endorsement of any
derivative products may not be stated or implied. None of the investigators has any affiliations or
financial involvement that conflicts with the material presented in this guide.
5. iii
Contents
Overview ................................................................................................................................................1
Why Create a Pathways Community HUB?...........................................................................................2
Reason #1: To Catalyze the Goals of Health Care Reform...............................................................2
Reason #2: To Pay for Value, Not Volume.......................................................................................2
Reason #3: To Embrace a Comprehensive Approach Focused on Risk Factor Reduction................3
How To Create and Use a Pathways Community HUB.........................................................................4
The HUB Model..............................................................................................................................4
1. Find.......................................................................................................................................5
2. Treat......................................................................................................................................5
3. Measure.................................................................................................................................5
Key Insights and Lessons Learned in Developing an Effective Community HUB..................................7
Overview of the Pathways Community HUB Prerequisites and Standards.............................................8
Governance Documents...................................................................................................................9
Needs Assessment ............................................................................................................................9
Care Coordination Program Requirements....................................................................................10
Data Collection and Payment System Linked to Outcomes ..........................................................10
Client Information.........................................................................................................................11
Risk Assessment.............................................................................................................................11
Data System...................................................................................................................................11
Quality Assurance..........................................................................................................................12
Community Care Coordinator Requirements and Training ..........................................................12
Closing Summary.................................................................................................................................13
References.............................................................................................................................................13
Additional Resources ............................................................................................................................14
Appendixes
Appendix A : Pathways Community HUBs From Network Involved in National Certification...........15
Appendix B: Community Hub Pathways .............................................................................................17
Appendix C: Sample Demographic and Referral Form.........................................................................41
Appendix D: Sample Adult Checklist...................................................................................................42
6. iv
CCCLN Quick Start Guide Work Group
Cochairs
Sarah Redding
Laura Brennan
Mark Redding
Members
Brenda Leath
Annette Pope
Rick Wilk
Lindy Vincent
AHRQ Staff
Phillip Jordan
Mary Nix
Judi Consalvo (retired)
Harriet Bennett
Doreen Bonnett
Westat Staff
Veronica Nieva
Deborah Carpenter
Maurice Johnson
Brenda Leath
Sushama Rajapaksa
7. 1
Overview
This Quick Start guide complements Pathways Community HUB Manual: A Guide To Identify and
Address Risk Factors, Reduce Costs, and Improve Outcomes, initially published in 2010 by the Agency
for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). The publication provides a detailed overview of the
Pathways Community HUB (HUB) Model. The HUB is a community care coordination approach
focused on reducing modifiable risk factors for high-risk individuals and populations.
The HUB relies on community care coordinators (CCCs)—community health workers, nurses, social
workers, and others—who reach out to at-risk individuals through home visits and community-based
work. Once an at-risk individual is engaged, the CCC completes a comprehensive assessment of health,
social, behavioral health, economic, and other issues that place the individual at increased risk. Each
identified risk factor is tracked as a standardized Pathway that confirms the risk is addressed through
connection to evidence-based and best practice interventions.
The Pathway is a tool for confirming that the intervention has been received and that the risk factor has
been successfully addressed. The Pathway also serves as the quality assurance and payment tool, and it is
used by the CCC to ensure that each risk factor is addressed and that outcomes have improved.
When this model is deployed across multiple agencies within a community, the centralized HUB helps
agencies and CCCs avoid duplication of effort. The HUB serves as a communitywide networking
strategy that helps isolated (“siloed”) programs become a quality-focused team to identify those at risk
and connect them to care.
The HUB model was first developed by the Community Health Access Project (CHAP) in Mansfield,
Ohio, with leadership from Drs. Sarah and Mark Redding. The model involves working across
organizational silos within a community (CHAP worked with multiple stakeholders in three counties)
to reach at-risk individuals and connect them to health and social services that yield positive health
outcomes. The model is now part of a national network of community-based initiatives (Appendix
A) working under a common set of national standards and certification developed by the Pathways
Community HUB Institute.
This quick start guide is a reference and resource for public and private stakeholders engaged in
improving the community care coordination system for identifying high-risk individuals; documenting
their specific health, social, and behavioral health risk factors; and addressing those risks in a pay-for-
performance approach. The HUB focuses on individuals and populations, and it provides coordination,
measurement, and impact data that can help guide local and regional policies and reimbursement
strategies. The target audience includes all those involved in the design, implementation, and financing
of care coordination services, especially within the community setting.
This guide includes an overview of the process, as well as tools and resources needed to develop a HUB.
Additional information on the HUB model and Pathways is available in the full manual.
8. 2
Why Create a Pathways Community HUB?
A Pathways Community HUB is an effective strategy for achieving the goals of improved health, social,
and behavioral health outcomes and reduced health care costs.
Reason #1: To Catalyze the Goals of Health Care Reform
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is intended to improve population health and quality
of care while containing costs. One of the key strategies for meeting these goals is the development
of accountable care organizations (ACOs). ACOs need to provide the populations they serve with
appropriate, timely access to high-quality, well-coordinated health and social services that improve
health and contain health care costs. The HUB serves as a framework that can help communities and
ACOs improve population health and lower costs.
Through communication, collaboration, and built-in incentives, the HUB increases the efficiency and
effectiveness of care coordination services, especially in the community setting. Specific checklists and
Pathways have been developed to ensure that at-risk individuals are identified, that their risk factors
are assessed, and that each risk factor is tracked using a specific standard Pathway. Rather than allow
providers of health and social services to continue functioning in isolated silos, the HUB requires them
to work collaboratively, reaching out to those at greatest risk and connecting them to evidence-based
interventions, with a focus on prevention and early treatment.
To ensure quality and accountability across all providers of care coordination services, the HUB acts
as a central clearinghouse that “registers” and tracks at-risk individuals, making sure that their health,
behavioral health, social, environmental, and educational needs are met. The HUB provides ongoing
quality assurance that results in less waste and duplication of care coordination services, lower costs,
improved health status, and fewer health disparities.
The HUB provides both an individual- and a population-focused approach to identify at-risk
populations, assess their risk factors, and ensure that each modifiable risk factor is addressed with
evidence-based or best practice interventions using Pathways. Payments in this model are closely tied to
the production of positive outcomes (completed Pathways).
Reason #2: To Pay for Value, Not Volume
Communities that are ready to work toward an accountable system focused on identifying and reducing
risk factors using the HUB model can face significant challenges. Connecting those at risk to timely,
high-quality care requires expertise, accountability, and investment. Our current business model for
providing care coordination services reimburses based on caseloads and chart notes. Care coordination
contracts typically purchase “work products” and processes but are not tied to meaningful outcomes for
the individual.
In January 2015, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced the next
phase in improving health care.1
The next phase includes three components:
• Using incentives to motivate higher value care by increasingly tying payment to value through
alternative payment models;
• Changing the way care is delivered through greater teamwork and integration, more effective
coordination of providers across settings, and greater attention by providers to population health; and
• Harnessing the power of information to improve care for patients.
9. 3
The net cost of operating HHS in fiscal year 2012 was $855.5 billion, with most of those costs (more
than 94 percent) related to Medicare and other health programs.2
A primary focus of the Government’s
health care spending is to produce positive health outcomes; unfortunately, that is not the case. A 2013
brief by the Institute of Medicine3
summarized that “Not only are their lives shorter, but Americans
also have a longstanding pattern of poorer health that is strikingly consistent and pervasive over the life
course—at birth, during childhood and adolescence, for young and middle-aged adults, and for older
adults.”
A focus on assessing and addressing risk factors at the individual and population levels represents a
substantial opportunity for improving health outcomes. Very little of the current funding is strategically
focused on identifying and addressing the critical risk factors that produce adverse health outcomes.
Reason #3: To Embrace a Comprehensive Approach Focused on Risk
Factor Reduction
Working to improve health outcomes requires more than access to medical care; it encompasses
behavioral health, as well as social, environmental, and educational factors—the “social determinants
of health.” All of these factors must be addressed in a holistic and comprehensive manner in order to
improve health for an individual or a population. Some risk factors are addressed at the individual level:
housing, smoking cessation, insurance, medical home, employment, adult education, and evidence-
based parenting instruction. For each of these issues there are specific evidence-based and best practice
interventions available that can address the risk factor.
There are also risk factors that need to be addressed at the population level, such as neighborhood safety,
access to nutritious food, and environmental pollution. Population-level risk factors are recognized
as also being critical interventions to improve outcomes. The HUB model primarily focuses on
individually modifiable risk factors but can provide important data about the population’s health as well.
As most identified risk factors responsible for adverse health outcomes are related to social determinants
of health, a comprehensive approach is critical.4
Current care coordination contracts are primarily focused on “work products” (e.g., caseloads, phone
calls, forms completed) and not on connecting at-risk clients to services they need. In addition, there
is no incentive for the multiple agencies providing care coordination services to communicate or
collaborate with each other, leading to duplication and inefficiencies.
The HUB model provides the infrastructure to manage multiple sources of care coordination funding
across the community network. The concept of “braided funding” is possible because of Pathways. One
individual may receive care coordination through several health and social service agencies, but in the
current system the duplication of service is not easy to identify. The HUB allows collaboration among
funders to more fully support and address all the needs of an at-risk community member. Unnecessary
duplication is identified and eliminated.
The Pathways methodology allows one care coordinator to work with a client to address multiple
Pathways. The funding that supports each of these intervention areas can be organized by assigning
specific funders to specific Pathways. For example, a health plan may pay for medically focused
Pathways, while other agencies may pay for social service Pathways. There are examples of a broad array
of care coordination funding streams within the current HUBs, including Medicaid, managed care
plans, United Way, housing providers, health departments, behavioral health, property taxes, and others.
10. 4
Community
HUB
Care
coordination
agencies
Regional organization and tracking of care coordination
HUB—Client Coordination
• Demographic Intake
• Initial Checklist assign Pathways
• Regular home visits—checklists and Pathways completed
• Discharge when Pathways complete (no issues)
How To Create and Use a Pathways Community HUB
The HUB Model
A Pathways Community HUB represents a network of care coordination agencies focused on reaching
those at greatest risk and addressing their identified risk factors. The care coordination agencies may
represent any agency deploying community care coordinators (CCCs)—community health workers,
nurses, social workers, or others—to reach out to individuals and to help them connect to care. Agencies
include local community organizations, outreach centers, health departments, and care coordinators
who are part of a community health center.
The central HUB agency is responsible for leading the network and developing the contracts and
requirements for participating care coordination agencies. The HUB is responsible for ensuring that
the national standards for Pathways Community HUBs are built into the accountability, function, and
billing process for the network.
The HUB, by definition, is a neutral entity that does not directly provide care coordination services.
The HUB gathers the multiple care coordination agencies together into an organized team, trains
and supports them to identify those in the community at greatest risk, and assesses and tracks each
modifiable risk with standardized Pathways. National HUB certification through the Pathways
Community HUB Institute (HUB Institute) is becoming a greater focus and requirement of funders
and policymakers.
The HUB usually employs two or three administrative staff and does not represent a large additional
layer to the existing system. The cost savings that result from eliminating duplication, producing positive
outcomes, and realizing related efficiencies far exceed any additional cost for this central organizational
component of effective community care coordination. As noted, the HUB does not hire or deploy care
coordinators but rather supports, coordinates, and tracks outcomes for all the agencies that do provide
the direct on-the-ground, community-based care coordination.
11. 5
The Pathways Community HUB model is best summarized in three steps:
1. Find
2. Treat
3. Measure
1. Find
The HUB model represents a network of agencies that deploy CCCs, in a home-visiting methodology,
to engage at-risk individuals in Pathways-focused care coordination. The central HUB of the
network does not employ the care coordinators but serves as a central point of organization, quality
measurement, tracking, and billing for the agencies that do. The HUB as a network is designed to
specifically focus on at-risk individuals as defined by the community.
Communities considering this model need to complete, or have access to, a thorough, up-to-date
community needs assessment to determine the population of interest. Examples of recommended
strategies for the assessment process include geocoding of health and social data, risk-scoring
methodology, screening tools, and key stakeholder surveys that encompass at-risk community members.
When the HUB is operational, strategies must be developed not only to “find” the at-risk individuals,
but also to engage them in care coordination services.
When a new client is discovered through referral or community outreach, all of the required paperwork
to protect personal health information must be completed by the CCC and submitted before the client
can be registered as a new client in the HUB. A key role of the HUB is to monitor and notify CCCs
of any duplication of service. Once engaged, the CCC and individual are linked in the HUB, and the
HUB will flag any further attempts to register that person for care coordination services. It may be
appropriate for an at-risk individual to have more than one care coordinator, but the reasons behind that
decision need to be clear.
The data collection process begins once an individual is engaged by a CCC. Initially, data are captured
in a standardized demographic intake form and initial checklist. The checklist must represent a
comprehensive assessment of health, behavioral health, and social service risk factors. There is flexibility
in the way that different communities develop their checklists, but the information gathered should
identify any of the risk factors that may lead to poor health outcomes.
2. Treat
For each risk factor identified, a specific standardized Pathway is assigned, and then each Pathway
is tracked step by step through completion. An at-risk individual may have many Pathways being
addressed simultaneously, reflecting multiple health and social issues identified by the CCC. The
completion of each Pathway ensures the delivery of one or more evidence-based or best practice
interventions to address the risk factor.
3. Measure
Pathways are the standardized outcome measurement tools the HUB tracks. As risk factors are identified
and addressed, the Pathways are completed and a reduction in risk is recorded. HUBs need to have
the capacity to measure and track an individual’s risk status over time. Some HUBs are looking at risk
reduction in specific areas, such as health, behavioral health, social factors, and financial security, and
12. 6
are using these data to study the impact of care coordination over time. A key element of health system
transformation is this intense focus on what factors are actually causing the poor health outcomes in a
community and how these factors can be addressed most quickly and cost effectively.
The effectiveness of Pathways used as a single measure and as a comprehensive group of measures has
been tested and researched. The model and its impact affirm that like many other effective interventions
that require more than one component, more than one risk factor must be addressed to demonstrate
changes in health outcomes. The comprehensive nature of the assessment and the use of multiple
Pathways are critical to achieving positive outcomes.5
The measurement of specific items within the
Pathways and multiple specific Pathways was conducted by Westat as part of a National Institutes of
Health initiative. Testing of single Pathways and groups of Pathways in further studies could be very
beneficial to the development of this model.
To receive HUB certification by the national HUB Institute, a HUB must use the standardized
Pathways. A complete list of the 20 approved Pathways, as well as a chart used with two of the Pathways,
can be found in Appendix B. Pathways are specifically designed to be clear and concise. Although a
new HUB is not required to use all 20 Pathways as it starts up, it is expected to gain experience with
the Pathways and then develop new Pathways when needed, with the support of the HUB Institute.
By standardizing the Pathways, HUBs can compare outcomes across care coordinators, agencies,
communities, regions, and States. Standardization also allows the development of universal billing codes
to tie payment to outcomes. In Ohio, Medicaid managed care plans have developed contracts based on
Pathway completion.
Many communities want to track more comprehensive measures, such as overall reductions in
emergency department visits, improvements in hemoglobin A1c, and reductions in hospital
readmissions. The HUB continues to track individual Pathways but can also “bundle” Pathways together
to achieve a larger objective. For example, to reduce emergency department visits, most individuals may
need to receive:
• Ongoing primary care (Medical Home or Medical Referral Pathway);
• Help with medication (Medication Assessment or Medication Management Pathway);
• Education about their conditions, medication, or needed services (Education Pathway);
• Help with housing (Housing Pathway); and
• Help with barriers to connecting to other social services (Social Service Referral Pathway).
The Pathway bundle has a specific billing code, and funders can offer an incentive payment if all of the
identified Pathways are successfully completed.
For a given individual, some Pathways may not be completed and the desired outcomes may not be
reached. The Pathway still needs to be closed, but it is recorded by the HUB as “finished incomplete.”
Pathway incompletion is actually very important data for the HUB to monitor. The CCC is required
to document why the Pathway was not successfully completed. The HUB can track which Pathways
are not completed and compile the reasons. For example, Pathways may not be completed because
the resources are not available in a community. The community can use these data to evaluate gaps in
services or other issues that can be addressed on a policy level.
13. 7
Pathways are the metric that focuses on successful resolution of an identified issue. Pathways are also
the mechanism the HUB uses to tie financial accountability to completion. Recent peer-reviewed
publications have demonstrated a significant improvement in outcomes and cost savings using this
model.5
We know that delivering health and social services from silos does not work. The HUB provides
the infrastructure communities need to support multiple and diverse agencies and related resources so
they can work collaboratively to address health inequities and achieve real improvements for at-risk
individuals.
Key Insights and Lessons Learned in Developing an Effective
Community HUB
Pathways Community HUBs start in a variety of ways. Most HUBs have developed through the efforts
of a small group of community-focused individuals determined to make a difference for their most
at-risk citizens. For example, in Albuquerque, New Mexico, the HUB started with two community
organizers from the university and a county commissioner. The HUB in Toledo, Ohio, was built with
the help of a local pediatrician and the director of a hospital network. The original HUB in Mansfield,
Ohio, was built through collaboration with local physicians and community leaders. HUBs are
transformative by design, and it takes a determined core group of individuals with vision and dedication
to make a HUB a reality.
The HUB’s primary focus must be on finding those most at risk in the community and ensuring
that risk is reduced, leading to better health outcomes and lower costs. It is essential that the right
community partners be engaged in this process to allow appropriate connections to be established in
building the network. A sense of community support and ownership is critical in lending ongoing
support to the HUB. Most communities begin with a segment of the at-risk population, such as high-
risk pregnant women, adults with multiple chronic conditions, or frequent users of hospital emergency
departments. Once the infrastructure is in place, HUBs are designed to grow as the community gains
experience with the model.
Pathway funders need to be engaged at the very beginning of the community discussion about
implementing a HUB. Health plans, hospitals, social service agencies, ACOs, foundations, and other
identified “Pathway purchasers” need to be involved in defining the at-risk population and standard
Pathways to be used. It is a major transition for care coordination agencies to move from working
in competitive silos to working as an unduplicated team with contracts and payments focused on
outcomes. It is important to have adequate support and incentives in place to move communities
toward this accountable, business-focused model.
Strong care coordination agencies that are effectively serving high-risk community members will usually
find that their reimbursement is increased with the HUB approach. Agencies that are not successfully
engaging at-risk individuals or that do not follow up to connect them to services will not do well with
this model. Payment is based on outcomes, and agencies must be able to confirm that risk factors have
been effectively addressed.
To achieve sustainability, the HUB must develop and work toward expanding the number of funders
supporting the HUB network. Agreements with the funders are designed to reflect the risk identification
and risk reduction components of the HUB model. The HUB Institute has developed coding strategies
for Pathways that can be used with multiple funders to achieve “braided funding.” Individuals at high
14. 8
risk for poor health outcomes have many different risk factors, and one funder usually cannot cover
all the Pathways that need to be addressed. Identifying which funders will pay for specific Pathways is
essential to developing braided funding and to adequately funding the CCC.
As CCCs in the field start to reach out and engage those at greatest risk, they begin the data collection
process by completing the comprehensive assessment. As they use Pathways to address the risk factors
identified by the assessment, they must have an effective data flow and evaluation methodology in place.
Simple operational reports for CCCs, supervisors, and administrators are essential. These reports allow
a quick view of how this “outcome production” process is moving along at all levels: individual, CCC’s
caseload, agency, and across the entire HUB network. The reports are critical for the model to reach its
maximum potential.
The questions that reports should answer include: “Are we reaching those at greatest risk?” “What
risk factors are being identified within the population we are serving?” “How much time does it take
to address these risk factors?” “Which care coordinators and which agencies are able to address the
risk factors the fastest?” “What strategies are the most efficient care coordinators and agencies using
to quickly address the risk factors?” “What risk factors are taking the longest to address or cannot be
addressed, and what are the reasons?”
Getting effective technical support and carefully understanding the evidence-based standards and
principles of the HUB model is essential to developing effective HUBs. The HUB Institute was
created to provide technical assistance in key areas of model implementation, especially in support of
the national standards. The original Community Care Coordination Learning Network (CCCLN),
supported by AHRQ, provided the foundation for the development of the national certification process.
There are also vendors available to provide operational support to HUBs with regard to implementation,
training, technology, and contracting for care coordination services.
Newly developed and existing HUBs need to focus on and work toward national HUB certification.
When the CCCLN evaluated HUBs that developed over the past 10 years, it found that as many as
one-third were not successful or sustainable. HUBs that did not seek specific technical support for the
model and did not focus on the evidence-based standards were unable to demonstrate outcomes. It
is very difficult to make a case to funders to support the HUB infrastructure without demonstrating
improved outcomes and reduced costs. HUBs that focus on the national standards and enroll in
certification demonstrate significantly better outcomes and sustainability.
Overview of the Pathways Community HUB Prerequisites and
Standards
HUB directors, public health leaders, third party payers, policymakers, and other community
stakeholders have requested certification of the HUB model. This certification provides standards and
expectations for HUB implementers and payers. The HUB Institute—with funding from the Kresge
Foundation and in partnership with the Community Health Access Project, Communities Joined
in Action, Georgia Health Policy Center, and Rockville Institute—is leading the HUB certification
process.
Certification supports current and future HUBs by requiring (1) the evidence-based and best practice
components known to be essential for high-quality community care coordination services and (2) an
efficient regional infrastructure that can lead to improved health outcomes and reduced costs. The
15. 9
standards support a basic framework of quality that encourages local variation and innovation within
various cultural and geographic settings. Certification enables funders and policymakers to make wise
investments in care coordination services that ensure quality, health improvement, and the value of
contracted services.
The complete prerequisites and standards for HUB certification can be found at the HUB Institute Web
page.6
This section highlights some of the key elements that are required.
Governance Documents
By definition, the HUB is a neutral and independent legal entity that has legal capacity to enter into
agreements or contracts (Prerequisite #1). Many of the certification prerequisites and standards tie
directly into the governance of the HUB, including the following items.
Prerequisite #6
• The HUB coordinates a network of care coordination agencies serving at-risk clients. The HUB
must have legal documents describing the relationship between the HUB and care coordination
agency members.
• The HUB model is designed to use what is already working in communities, including existing
care coordinators and agencies. Most communities have funding in place for a variety of care
coordination work, but the infrastructure for creating a network of agencies together is lacking.
Prerequisites #8 and #9
• The HUB must have contracts with a minimum of two payers to ensure comprehensive and
sustainable care coordination services. Contracts must confirm that a minimum of 50 percent of
all payments are related to an individual’s intermediate and final outcomes/Pathway steps.
Prerequisite #10
• The HUB must document that it complies with the Health Information Privacy and
Accountability Act through training, policies, and signed agreements.
Prerequisite #11
• The HUB needs to operate in a transparent and accountable manner and needs to have policies
around conflict of interest and distribution of referrals to care coordination agency members. It is
a requirement that the HUB not directly provide care coordination services.
Needs Assessment
Prerequisite #5
• The HUB reviews and/or conducts community needs assessments. This assessment should
include local data specific to medical, behavioral health, social, environmental, and educational
factors and guide the HUB in its efforts to improve health and reduce inequities. The HUB
needs to show how it uses the community needs assessment to identify the populations to be
targeted for community care coordination services.
16. 10
Care Coordination Program Requirements
The HUB creates agreements with each care coordination agency to delineate expectations around
hiring, training, and supervision of CCCs. In addition, the administrative staff of the community
agencies need training and support to become part of a network of agencies focused on finding those
most at risk and connecting them to care. Experienced, capable, and creative HUB leadership is needed
to help agencies move away from being competitive silos and make the transition toward functioning as
a team.
Standards #5 and #19
• The HUB is responsible for monitoring the performance of its care coordination agency members
and for improving the quality of care coordination services. Written agreements are required to
ensure clarity and transparency of the roles of the HUB and care coordination agency members
and the financial arrangements between them.
Standard #6
• Many of the HUB standards define policies and expectations for participating programs,
agencies, and providers or for community care coordination services. Standard #6 requires the
HUB to have operational policies and procedures in place that cover client enrollment, allocation
and monitoring of referrals, documentation requirements, ratios of CCCs to clients, and other
key operational items.
Data Collection and Payment System Linked to Outcomes
Pathways
Prerequisite #7
• The HUB is required to use standardized Pathways. Appendix B defines all 20 Pathways approved
by the HUB Institute. Pathways must be used as defined, and new Pathways cannot be developed
without submission to the HUB Institute for review. Pathways outline key stages required for
the delivery of high-quality and efficient care coordination services. Each Pathway focuses on
one significant client need or problem and identifies and documents the key steps that lead to a
desired, measurable outcome. In addition, standardized Pathways allow research, evaluation, and
best practices using standard metrics.
Prerequisite #9
• The 20 standardized Pathways link billing codes to Pathway steps. Payment for outcomes
is a key component of the HUB model and promotes accountability, quality, equity, health
improvement, and value. Contracts with payers must specify that at least 50 percent of all
payments are related to an individual’s intermediate and final Pathway steps.
• Prior to the launch of HUB operations, a tracking and payment system must be developed
that rewards participating organizations and individuals based on the completion of Pathways.
Participating agencies within a HUB must be rewarded and incentivized to work in collaboration
with other agencies to reach those at greatest risk and connect them to care, recognizing that
those individuals require more time and expertise to serve.
17. 11
• Community agency directors and staff must also receive basic training related to the HUB model.
The invoices they submit are also reports of the outcomes achieved during the billing period.
Understanding the connection between higher quality of service and the payment structure is
critical to those administering and leading the care coordination agencies.
Client Information
Standard #13
• The HUB must collect client demographics and other relevant information to effectively
address the medical, behavioral health, social, environmental, and educational needs of the
at-risk client. Appendix C is an example of a demographic intake form, which is used to obtain
key information about the client upon enrollment in the HUB. Checklists capture specific
information about the client’s health and social issues at each face-to-face encounter. The
checklists should document any identified risk factors and provide information for the initiation
of Pathways.
A more comprehensive checklist is used at the initial visit, and shorter checklists are used on an
ongoing basis to monitor changes between visits. Appendix D is an example of a checklist used
for adult clients. Other client information can be gathered through standard tools or screens,
such as the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ9), a depression screener; Ages & Stages
Questionnaire (ASQ); and Patient Activation Measure (PAM).
Risk Assessment
Standard #14
• To ensure an at-risk individual’s needs are being addressed and met—and an efficient use of
limited resources—the HUB assesses and monitors each client’s risk factors. The HUB must be
able to describe how risk measurement translates into intensity of care coordination services.
Data System
Standards #17 and #18
• The HUB tracks, monitors, and reports on client services and promotes collaboration,
intersectoral teamwork, and community–clinical linkages. Although a complex data system
is not mandatory, the HUB needs to develop accurate and efficient methods for tracking and
monitoring data collection for at-risk clients. Most HUBs will rely on information technology
to perform this task. Whatever approach is used, this system must ensure the protection of client
information at all times.
• The HUB ensures that clients (1) are identified and engaged; (2) are evaluated to determine
their needs, risk factors, and risk level; (3) have an individualized care plan; (4) are assigned to
appropriate standardized Pathways; (5) are monitored through the completion of the appropriate
Pathways; (6) receive home visits; (7) are reevaluated to determine needs, risk level, and service
adjustments; and (8) are discharged when their needs are met. Communication and data sharing
among practitioners, agencies, CCCs, and the client help ensure quality and continuity of
services.
18. 12
Quality Assurance
Standard #8
• The HUB is responsible for monitoring and improving the quality of care coordination services
provided to those who are at risk. Therefore, the HUB must have a quality improvement plan
and must regularly evaluate its services as well as those services provided by care coordination
agency members. The HUB quality improvement plan should describe how quality improvement
projects are selected, managed, and monitored. The HUB needs a communication strategy
that covers planned quality improvement activities and processes and how updates will be
communicated regularly to all involved.
Standard #19
• This standard emphasizes that the HUB must monitor the performance of its care coordination
agency members and offer technical assistance to ensure quality and client safety.
Community Care Coordinator Requirements and Training
Many different types of professionals can serve as community care coordinators, including social
workers, community health workers, nurses, and case managers. By definition, these individuals spend
the majority of their time meeting face-to-face with clients in a community setting, including the
home. To ensure the provision of high-quality services and effective collaboration across all providers,
each HUB should develop basic human resource requirements for care coordinators, along with a
comprehensive training program. Individuals receiving care coordination services are often dealing
with complex health and social issues, and community care coordinators need adequate preparation.
The HUB should have clear policies and procedures on all aspects of training, documentation, and
accountability for results.
Standard #9
• The HUB model of care coordination focuses on improving health, advancing equity, improving
quality, and eliminating disparities, and all HUB and care coordination agency personnel must
complete cultural competency training.
Standard #10
• Community care coordinators are supported and supervised by a competent professional,
working within the scope of his or her license. The level of supervision varies based on the
training of the community care coordinator. It is required that community health workers have
supervisors who review and sign off on documentation.
Standard #12
• Education, training, and support for community health workers and for community care
coordinators other than community health workers are essential to achieve improved outcomes
for those clients at risk. The HUB must provide documentation that community care
coordinators meet the minimum training requirements required as part of certification.6
19. 13
Closing Summary
The identification and strategic reduction of an individual’s risk factors represent an opportunity to
address disparities and reduce costs. The Pathways Community HUB model builds the community
infrastructure and provides the tools, standards, and strategies to implement this approach for
individuals and populations. Across the Nation, there are effective and capable community organizers;
with support, they can use existing resources to implement this HUB model and bring about
transformative change.
References
1. Burwell SM. Setting value-based payment goals—HHS efforts to improve U.S. health care. N Engl J Med
2015 372:897-99. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1500445
2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. FY 2012 summary of financial and performance
information.
3. Institute of Medicine. U.S. health in international perspective. Shorter lives, poorer health. Report Brief.
Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; January 2013. http://www.iom.edu/~/media/Files/
Report%20Files/2013/US-Health-International-Perspective/USHealth_Intl_PerspectiveRB.pdf.
4. Shortell A. Bridging the divide between health and health care. JAMA 2013;309(11):1121-2.
5. Redding S, Conrey E, Porter K, et al. Pathways community care coordination in low birth weight prevention.
Matern Child Health J 2015;19(3):643-50. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10995-014-1554-4.
6. Pathways Community Hub Certification Program [Web site]. https://www.pchcp.rockvilleinstitute.org.
20. 14
Additional Resources
American Heart Association. Hispanics’ hypertension better controlled with equal access to care. Science Daily
2007;14 Sep. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070913090355.htm.
Community Care Coordination Learning Network. Pathways community HUB manual: a guide to
identify and address risk factors, reduce costs, and improve outcomes. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality; January 2016. AHRQ Publication No. 15(16)-0070-EF. Replaces Publication No.
(09)10-0088. http://innovations.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/Guides/CommunityHUBManual.pdf.
Community Health Access Project. Focusing on outcomes: neighbors connecting neighbors. http://chap-ohio.net/.
Cunningham PJ, Felland LE. Falling behind: Americans’ access to medical care deteriorates, 2003-2007. Tracking
Report No. 19. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change; June 2008.
http://www.hschange.org/CONTENT/993/.
Davis K, Schoen C, Schoenbaum SC, et al. Mirror, mirror on the wall: looking at the quality of American
health care through the patient’s lens. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; January 2004. http://www.
commonwealthfund.org/~/media/files/publications/fund-report/2004/jan/mirror--mirror-on-the-wall--looking-at-
the-quality-of-american-health-care-through-the-patients-lens/davis_mirrormirror_683-pdf.pdf.
Hoffman CB, Paradise J. Health insurance and access to health care in the United States. Ann NY Acad Sci
2008;1136:149-60.
Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new
health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001. https://www.iom.edu/
Reports/2001/Crossing-the-Quality-Chasm-A-New-Health-System-for-the-21st-Century.aspx.
Klerman LV. Nonfinancial barriers to the receipt of medical care. U.S. Health Care Child 1992; 2(2):171-85.
http://futureofchildren.org/futureofchildren/publications/journals/article/index.xml?journalid=67&articleid=%20
477§ionid=3266.
National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2007. With chartbook on trends in the health of
Americans. Hyattsville, MD: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2007. DHHS Publication No. 2008-
1232. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus07.pdf.
National Quality Forum. Priority setting for healthcare performance measurement. Addressing performance
measure gaps in care coordination. Final report. (Prepared under Department of Health and Human Services
Contract No. HHSM-500-2012-00009I, Task 5). Washington, DC: NQF; August 2014. http://www.
qualityforum.org/Publications/2014/08/Priority_Setting_for_Healthcare_Performance_Measurement__
Addressing_Performance_Measure_Gaps_in_Care_Coordination.aspx.
Shojania KG, Ranji SR, Shaw LK, et al. Vol. 2. Diabetes mellitus care. Closing the quality gap: a critical analysis
of quality improvement strategies. Technical Review No. 9 (Prepared by the Stanford University–UCSF Evidence-
based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0017). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality; September 2004. AHRQ Publication No. 04-0051-2. http://www.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/evidence/
pdf/qualgap2/qualgap2.pdf.
23. 17
Appendix B. Community Hub Pathways
• Adult Education Pathway
• Behavioral Health Pathway
• Developmental Referral Pathway
• Developmental Screening Pathway
• Education Pathway
• Employment Pathway
• Family Planning Pathway
• Health Insurance Pathway
• Housing Pathway
• Immunization Referral Pathway
• Immunization Screening Pathway
• Lead Pathway
• Medical Home Pathway
• Medical Referral Pathway
• Medication Assessment Chart
• Medication Assessment Pathway
• Medication Management Pathway
• Postpartum Pathway
• Pregnancy Pathway
• Smoking Cessation Pathway
• Social Service Referral Pathway
24. 18
Client’s Name ____________________________________ Date of Birth __________________
Community Care Coordinator ____________________ Agency________________________
Adult Education Pathway
_______________________________________
Start date
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
Educational goals
_______________________________________
Date of first class
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
Check-in dates
Initiation
Client identifies educational need(s).
Partner with client to establish/review
educational goals. Document goal and
desired outcomes.
Confirm that client is registered in class or
training program and attends first class.
Monitor client’s progress with educational
program.
• Confirm at least biweekly that client
is attending classes and document
progress.
Assist client in registering for training or
educational course:
• Gather necessary documentation for
registration.
• Determine if client needs to take an
assessment/placement exam and
schedule exam date.
Completion
Confirm that client successfully completes
stated educational goal:
• Course/class completed
• Training program completed
• Quarter/semester completed
Record reason if Finished Incomplete: ___________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
25. 19
Client’s Name ____________________________________ Date of Birth __________________
Community Care Coordinator ____________________ Agency________________________
Behavioral Health Pathway
Initiation date
Referral Source
Parent
School
Doctor
Self-referral
Other_______________________________
_______________________________________
Appointment date
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
Agency/provider
_______________________________________
Kept appointment date
_______________________________________
Kept appointment date
_______________________________________
Kept appointment date
____________________________________
____________________________________
____________________________________
____________________________________
____________________________________
____________________________________
____________________________________
____________________________________
____________________________________
____________________________________
____________________________________
____________________________________
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
Describe behavioral health issue(s): _____________
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
Care coordination plans: ______________________
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
Record reason if Finished Incomplete: ___________
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
Initiation
Client with behavioral health issue(s).
1. Identify referral source.
2. Document behavioral health issue(s)
(Describe below)
Completion
Client has kept three scheduled
appointments. Monitor followup
appointments with Medical Referral Pathway.
Schedule appointment for appropriate level
of service based on client’s need.
26. 20
Client’s Name ____________________________________ Date of Birth __________________
Community Care Coordinator ____________________ Agency________________________
Developmental Referral Pathway
_______________________________________
Start date
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
Reason for referral
Referred to Central Intake
Yes No
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
Reason given if “no”
_______________________________________
Scheduled date of evaluation
Education provided
Yes No
_______________________________________
Date of completed evaluation
Initiation
Child <3 years with suspected
developmental delays—record reason for
developmental referral.
1. Obtain parent/guardian consent for
evaluation.
2. Assist family with scheduling
developmental evaluation and obtaining
a prescription from primary care
provider.
Provide education to caregivers regarding
importance of keeping appointment.
Explain Part C services and review family’s
rights.
Explain agency options to obtain
developmental evaluation. Refer child to
Central Intake.
Completion
Document the date and results of completed
developmental evaluation.
Results and recommendations: _________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Record reason if Finished Incomplete: ___________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
27. 21
Client’s Name ____________________________________ Date of Birth __________________
Community Care Coordinator ____________________ Agency________________________
Developmental Screening Pathway
_______________________________________
Start date
Education provided
Yes No
_______________________________________
Date of screen
Circle ASQ Screen Used
2 4 6 8 9 10 12 14 16
18 20 22 24 27 30 33 36
Communication _________________________
Gross Motor____________________________
Fine Motor _____________________________
Problem Solving_________________________
Personal-Social__________________________
Circle ASQ-SE Screen Used
6 12 18 24 30 36
Total Score _____________________________
_______________________________________
Month/year for next screen
Initiation
Child <3 years of age at risk for a
developmental delay.
Child should be screened at least every 6
months using the age-appropriate ASQ or
ASQ-SE.*
Educate family about the importance of
developmental milestones.
Obtain consent from parent/guardian to do
developmental screening.
No
developmental
concerns
identified.
Discuss findings
with caregivers.
Record date for
next developmental
screen.
Record reason if Finished Incomplete: __________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
* ASQ = Ages & Stages Questionnaire. ASQ-SE is the Social Emotional version.
Developmental
concerns
identified and
discussed with
caregivers. Start
Developmental
Referral Pathway.
Completion
Child successfully screened using the age-
appropriate ASQ or ASQ-SE.
28. 22
Client’s Name ____________________________________ Date of Birth __________________
Community Care Coordinator ____________________ Agency________________________
Education Pathway
_______________________________________
Start date
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
Education
Format:
Handout
Talking points
Video
Other:_______________________
Document educational format used (check
only one).
Document education provided
(Example: educational content—module,
section, etc.)
Completion
Client reports that he/she understands
educational information.
Record reason if Finished Incomplete: ___________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Initiation
Education Pathway started by (check only
one):
Program-based curriculum
Client requests assistance
Referral from health care provider
Referral from other provider
Community care coordinator initiated
29. 23
Client’s Name ____________________________________ Date of Birth __________________
Community Care Coordinator ____________________ Agency________________________
Employment Pathway
_______________________________________
Start date
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
Work history
_______________________________________
Educational level
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
Employment goals
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
Barriers
_______________________________________
Date résumé completed
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
Dates applications submitted
_______________________________________
1 month
_______________________________________
2 months
_______________________________________
Completion—3 months
_______________________________________
Check-in dates
Record reason if Finished Incomplete: ___________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Completion
Client has found consistent source(s) of
steady income and is employed over a
period of 3 months.
Care coordinator will work with client
to monitor applications submitted for
employment.
Care coordinator will work with client to
confirm that résumé is completed.
Partner with client to identify:
1. Education and work history
• Previous work experience
• Educational level completed
• Employment goals (special training
needed for desired job)
2. Barriers to employment (felony record,
financial constraints, etc.)
Initiation
Client is requesting assistance in obtaining
a job.
30. 24
Client’s Name ____________________________________ Date of Birth __________________
Community Care Coordinator ____________________ Agency________________________
Family Planning Pathway
_______________________________________
Start date
Education provided
Record reason if Finished Incomplete: ___________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
i
The number 4 is a coding option; it is used for a permanent or long-acting reversible contraceptive. If these are chosen,
the Pathway is finished once the procedure is complete. All the other methods (“5”) are in a participant’s control, and the
Pathway is not finished until a followup check is done in 30 days to make sure she is still using the method chosen.
Yes No
_______________________________________
Date of appointment
_______________________________________
Provider or clinic
_______________________________________
Date appointment kept
Family Planning Method
Tubal Ligation (4)
Vasectomy—partner (4)i
IUD (4)
Implant (4)
Shot (4)
Abstinence (5)
Natural family planning (5)
Pills (5)
Patch (5)
Ring (5)
Diaphragm (5)
Condom (5)
Cervical cap (5)
Spermicide (5)
Other (5) ____________________
Initiation
Client has requested information on family
planning methods.
Provide family planning education.
Schedule appointment with primary care
provider or clinic
Followup with client
Confirm that client kept appointment and
document family planning method in
chart. Pathway is complete if tubal
ligation, vasectomy, IUD, implant, or
shot given.
Completion
If client has chosen a method other than
tubal ligation, vasectomy, IUD, implant, or
shot, then Pathway is complete if client is still
successfully using that method after 30 days.
31. 25
Client’s Name ____________________________________ Date of Birth __________________
Community Care Coordinator ____________________ Agency________________________
Health Insurance Pathway
_______________________________________
Start date
_______________________________________
Date application submitted
_______________________________________
Date approved
_______________________________________
Insurance
_______________________________________
Number
Record reason if Finished Incomplete (reason denied and referral made):
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Completion
Arrange followup within 2-6 weeks of
application submission to confirm
acceptance or denial of insurance.
• If denied, record reasons in
client’s record and refer client to other
community resources.
• If accepted, document status,
including insurance number, in client’s
record.
Confirm with agency that all forms have
been received and have been completed
properly.
Assist client and/or family in completing
forms as directed and submit to
appropriate agency.
Initiation
Client needs health insurance.
32. 26
Client’s Name ____________________________________ Date of Birth __________________
Community Care Coordinator ____________________ Agency________________________
Housing Pathway
_______________________________________
Start date
_______________________________________
Appointment scheduled
_______________________________________
Appointment kept
_______________________________________
Contact person
_______________________________________
Contact number
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
Check-in dates
_______________________________________
Completion date
Record reason if Finished Incomplete: ___________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Initiation
Client and/or family is identified to be in
need of affordable and suitable housing.
Identify reason(s) housing is required: (check
all that apply
❒ Eviction ❒ Safety issue(s)
❒ Homeless ❒ Too many for
❒ Domestic violence living space
❒ Lead ❒ Financial
❒ Fire/natural ❒ Poor rental history
disaster ❒ Poor location for
❒ Self-imposed access to services
(pets) ❒ Disability
❒ Discrimination ❒ Other: _________
Care coordinator confirms that client kept
appointment with housing organization.
If client is placed on a waiting list for
housing, obtain name and phone number of
contact person to follow up with regarding
status.
Follow up with housing contact person at
least biweekly to monitor housing progress.
Partner with client to contact appropriate
housing organization and schedule an
appointment to meet and discuss housing
options.
Help client prepare for meeting with
required documentation, child care,
transportation, etc.
Completion
Confirmation that client and/or family has
moved into an affordable suitable housing
unit for a minimum of 2 months.
33. 27
Client’s Name ____________________________________ Date of Birth __________________
Community Care Coordinator ____________________ Agency________________________
Immunization Referral Pathway
_______________________________________
Start date
Missing Immunizations:
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
Education provided
Record reason if Finished Incomplete: ___________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Yes No
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
Appointment dates
_______________________________________
Completion date
_______________________________________
Reviewer
Initiation
Client less than 18 years of age is confirmed
to be behind on immunizations.
Appointment(s) scheduled with
provider or clinic for missed immunizations.
Completion
Client’s immunization record
reviewed and verified to be up to
date.
Educate family about the importance of
immunizations.
34. 28
Client’s Name ____________________________________ Date of Birth __________________
Community Care Coordinator ____________________ Agency________________________
Immunization Screening Pathway
_______________________________________
Start date
Immunization History From:
Record reason if Finished Incomplete: ___________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Family’s record
Electronic registry
Health care provider
Health department
Other:_______________________
Education provided
Yes No
_______________________________________
Immunization records reviewer
_______________________________________
Completion date
Up to date
Not up to date
Initiation
Any client less than 18 years of age
• Determine immunization status by using
the family’s immunization record.
• If family is unable to provide records,
obtain written consent from client’s
parents/guardians to request
immunization record from provider(s).
Identify person trained in the current
immunization protocols to review
immunization status.
Completion
Client’s immunization record
reviewed and verified.
1. Client is up to date on all age-
appropriate immunizations. Monitor
immunization status during routine visits.
Record Pathway as complete.
2. Client is not up to date on all age-
appropriate immunizations. Record
Pathway as Finished Incomplete.
Document reasons immunizations are
behind and start the Immunization
Referral Pathway.
Educate family about the importance of
immunizations and maintaining up-to-date
record.
35. 29
Client’s Name ____________________________________ Date of Birth __________________
Community Care Coordinator ____________________ Agency________________________
Lead Pathway
_______________________________________
Start date
Education provided
Yes No
_______________________________________
Results/date
Document all that apply:
1. Medicaid
Yes No
2. High-risk ZIP Code ____________
_______________________________________
3. Yes to survey questions (circle)
_______________________________________
Appointment date
Record reason if Finished Incomplete: ______
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
Initiation
Any child more than 12 months old and any
child with identified risk factors (see step #4).
Provide lead education to all families with
young children and/or expectant mothers.
Determine if child needs a blood lead
test:
1. Medicaid
2. High-risk ZIP Code
3. “Yes” to any of the following questions:
• Live in or regularly visit a house,
daycare center, preschool, or home of a
babysitter/relative built before 1950?
• Live in or visit a house that has peeling,
chipping, dusting, or chalking paint?
• Live in or visit a house built before
1978 with recent, ongoing, or planned
renovation or remodeling?
• Have a sibling or playmate who has or
had lead poisoning?
• Frequently come in contact with an adult
who has a hobby or works with lead
(e.g., construction, welding, pottery,
painting)?
Appointment scheduled with provider to do
blood lead test.
Completion
Confirm that appointment was kept and
document results of lead blood test in
client’s record as:
Elevated: ≥ 10 µg/dl
Nonelevated: < 10 µg/dl
Refer to Health Department
Find out if child has ever had a blood lead test
and document results.
36. 30
Client’s Name ____________________________________ Date of Birth __________________
Community Care Coordinator ____________________ Agency________________________
Medical Home Pathway
_______________________________________
Start date
Payment Source:
Record reason if Finished Incomplete: ___________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Medicaid
Medicare
Private insurance
Self-pay
Other: _______________________
________________________________
________________________________
_______________________________________
Medical provider
_______________________________________
Date of initial appointment
Education provided
Yes No
_______________________________________
Date of kept appointment
Initiation
Client needs a medical home (an ongoing
source of primary medical care).
Find appropriate primary medical provider
options for payment source.
1. Obtain release of information from client.
2. Assist family in scheduling appointment.
3. Provide education about the importance
of keeping the appointment.
Determine payment source for health care.
Completion
Confirm that appointment was kept.
37. 31
Client’s Name ____________________________________ Date of Birth __________________
Community Care Coordinator ____________________ Agency________________________
Medical Referral Pathway
_______________________________________
Start date
_______________________________________
Referral - Code
Education provided
Code Numbers for Medical Referral Pathway
1. Primary Care
2. Specialty Medical Care ___________________________________________________________
3. Dental
4. Vision
5. Hearing
6. Family Planning
7. Mental Health
8. Substance Abuse
9. Speech and Language
10. Pharmacy
11. Other, please specify in record _____________________________________________________
Yes No
_______________________________________
Appointment date
_______________________________________
Date appointment kept
_______________________________________
Document how appointment was verified
Initiation
Client needs a health care
appointment.
Document type of appointment needed – use
codes.
(Only ONE code per Pathway)
Appointment scheduled with health care
provider/clinic.
Educate client/family about the importance
of regular health care visits and keeping
appointments.
Completion
Verify with health care provider that
appointment was kept.
Record reason if Finished Incomplete: ___________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
41. 35
Client’s Name ____________________________________ Date of Birth __________________
Community Care Coordinator ____________________ Agency________________________
Medication Assessment Pathway
_______________________________________
Start date
_______________________________________
Date information sent
Record reason if Finished Incomplete: ___________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Fax
HUB
Mail
Other________________
_______________________________________
Verification date
Medication concerns:
Yes No
Initiation
Client is taking prescribed medication(s).
Send completed Medication Assessment
Chart to client’s primary care provider.
Completion
Verify with primary care provider that chart
was received.
If medication issues are identified by
health care provider – initiate Medication
Management Pathway.
Complete the Medication Assessment
Chart with your client and/or client’s
caregiver:
1. Include all medications your client says
he/she is taking right now (prescription,
over the counter, herbal, alternative, etc.)
2. Record what your client says about the
medication in his/her own words – even
if it is different from the label.
42. 36
_______________________________________
Start date
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
Referral source
_______________________________________
Date information sent
Record reason if Finished Incomplete: ___________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Fax
HUB
Mail
Other: _______________________
________________________________
_______________________________________
Scheduled appt. date
_______________________________________
Date appointment kept with primary care
provider
_______________________________________
Date information sent
Fax
HUB
Mail
Other: _______________________
________________________________
_______________________________________
Verification date
Initiation
Client is not taking medications as prescribed.
(Record referral source)
Obtain list of medications client should be
taking from: (check all that apply)
❒ Primary care provider
❒ Medication reconciliation form from hospital
❒ Medication reconciliation form from
emergency department
❒ Pharmacist
❒ Other: ___________________________
Primary care provider completes medication
reconciliation:
1. Care coordinator receives updated
medication list.
2. Home visit scheduled within 3 business
days to follow up.
Visit client in his/her home and complete
the Medication Assessment Chart – send
completed chart to primary care provider for
review.
Visit client in his/her home and complete the
Medication Assessment Chart:
1. Send completed Medication Assessment
Chart and any reconciliation forms to
client’s primary care provider.
2. Schedule appointment with primary care
provider – record date.
Completion
Verify with primary care provider that client is
taking medications as prescribed.
Client’s Name ____________________________________ Date of Birth __________________
Community Care Coordinator ____________________ Agency________________________
Medication Management Pathway
43. 37
_______________________________________
Start date
_______________________________________
Date of delivery
_______________________________________
Date of appointment
_______________________________________
Health care provider
_______________________________________
Date postpartum appointment completed
_______________________________________
Family planning method
Record reason if Finished Incomplete: ___________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Initiation
Client has delivered and needs to schedule
a postpartum appointment.
Schedule appointment with health care
provider.
Follow up with client:
1. Confirm that client kept appointment.
2. Document family planning method
chosen in client’s record.
3. Determine if client has any questions or
concerns.
Client’s Name ____________________________________ Date of Birth __________________
Community Care Coordinator ____________________ Agency________________________
Postpartum Pathway
44. 38
_______________________________________
Start date
Education provided
Record reason if Finished Incomplete: ___________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Yes No
_______________________________________
Date of 1st PN appt. – set up by
Client
Care Coordinator
_______________________________________
Prenatal care provider
_______________________________________
Due date
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
Concerns
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
Date of birth
_______________________________________
Birth weight
_______________________________________
Gestational age (weeks)
Initiation
Any woman confirmed to be pregnant
through a pregnancy test.
Provide pregnancy education.
Check on woman’s prenatal appointments at
least monthly.
Completion
Healthy baby > 5 lbs 8 ounces
(2,500 grams).
Document baby’s birth weight, estimated
age in weeks, and any complications
Schedule appointment with prenatal care
provider:
• Date of 1st prenatal appointment
• Estimated due date
• Concerns identified
Client’s Name ____________________________________ Date of Birth __________________
Community Care Coordinator ____________________ Agency________________________
Pregnancy Pathway
45. 39
_______________________________________
Start date
_______________________________________
Tobacco product
_______________________________________
Amount
Stages of Change
Model – check stage:
Record reason if Finished Incomplete: ___________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Precontemplation
Contemplation
Action
Maintenance
Relapse
_______________________________________
Completion date
Self-report
Lab test confirmation
Initiation
Client states that he/she is a cigarette smoker/
tobacco user.
1. Determine where client is in the Stages of
Change Model.
2. Develop and document care plan in
record:
• Precontemplation: Educate and
motivate at each visit.
• Contemplation: Set a quit date and
discuss withdrawal symptoms.
• Action: Frequent support visits
(especially the first 2 weeks after
quitting), coping strategies, and self-help
materials.
• Maintenance: Continue to ask about
client’s smoking status at each visit;
continue education and encouragement.
• Relapse: Reassure client that most
smokers take several attempts before
finally quitting set another quit date.
Completion
Client has stopped smoking/using tobacco
products.
For all clients - at EACH visit, stress the
need to quit smoking:
• Discuss short- and long-term health, social,
and economic benefits of quitting.
• Discuss and document any barriers
identified.
• Discuss and document all options and refer
if appropriate:
– Self-help materials
– Drug therapy
– Smoking cessation programs
Client’s Name ____________________________________ Date of Birth __________________
Community Care Coordinator ____________________ Agency________________________
Smoking Cessation Pathway
46. 40
_______________________________________
Start date
_______________________________________
Code number
Education provided
Record reason if Finished Incomplete: ___________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Yes No
_______________________________________
Date of appointment
_______________________________________
Date of kept appointment
_______________________________________
Document how appt. was verified
Initiation
Client needs a social service referral.
Document type of service needed - use
codes. (Only ONE code per Pathway)
Provide appropriate education and discuss
the importance of keeping appointments.
Completion
Verify that client kept scheduled
appointment.
Appointment scheduled with social
service provider.
Code Numbers for Type of Service
1. Child Assistance 11. Medical Debt Assistance
2. Family Assistance 12. Legal Assistance
3. Food Assistance/WIC 13. Parent Education Assistance
4. Housing Assistance 14. Domestic Violence Assistance
5. Insurance Assistance 15. Clothing Assistance
6. Financial Assistance 16. Utilities Assistance
7. Medication Assistance 17. Translation Assistance
8. Transportation Assistance 18. Help Me Grow
9. Job/Employment Assistance 19. Other: _____________________________
10. Education Assistance
Client’s Name ____________________________________ Date of Birth __________________
Community Care Coordinator ____________________ Agency________________________
Social Service Referral Pathway
47. 41
Appendix C. Sample Demographic and Referral Form
Richland Community HUB
Sample Demographic Form
Pregnant Client
Date: _________________________ Referred by: ____________________________________
Client’s Name: _________________________________________________________________
Address: _______________________________________________________________________
Phone:________________________ Alternate Phone:_________________________________
Client’s Date of Birth: ___________ Gender: M F
Insurance Provider/Number:______________________________________________________
Reason for Referral: _____________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
Is Client Pregnant? Y N Estimated Due Date: ______________________________
Estimated Weeks: ________________________________
Date of 1st Prenatal Visit: _________________________
Referral Received by: _____________________________________________________________
Referral Assigned to:_______________________ on ___________________________________
Referral Outcome: _______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
48. 42
Appendix D: Sample Adult Checklist
Initial Adult Checklist
Visit Date:________________ Start: ___________ End: _________ Visit Type: ___________________
Care Manager: ________________________________________________________________________
Name: _________________________________ DOB: _______________________________________
Address: ________________________________ Phone: ______________________________________
SSN: _____________________ Race: _________ Ethnicity: _____________ Gender: M F
Insurance _______________________________ Medicaid Number:____________________________
Referral Date:____________________________ Emergency Contact Number: ___________________
YES NO Client Information
___ ___ Are you single?
___ ___ If no: 1-significant other, 2-married, 3-separated, 4-divorced, 5-widowed, 6-other
____________________________________________________________________________
___ ___ Do you rent your home or apartment?
___ ___ If no: 1-own home, 2-live with relatives, 3-live with friends, 4-not from this area,
___ ___ 5-homeless, 6-other___________________________________________________________
___ ___ Do you speak another language besides English at home?
___ ___ If yes, do you need a translator for appointments? _______________________________
___ ___ Are you in school now?
___ ___ If no: 1-college graduate, 2-high school diploma, 3-GED, 4-dropped out of high school,
___ ___ 5-other______________________________________________________________________
___ ___ Are you interested in finding a job?
___ ___ If no: 1-employed, 2-on disability, 3-enrolled in a training program, 4-other ___________
____________________________________________________________________________
___ ___ If disabled, what is the reason? ________________________________________________
___ ___ Do you need help with transportation to appointments?
___ ___ What are you using now for transportation? _____________________________________
___ ___ Do you have children?
___ ___ If yes: How many? ___________________________________________________________
___ ___ How many children live with you? ______________________________________________
___ ___ Do any of your children have special needs? _____________________________________
___ ___ Do you need help with child care?
___ ___ Do you have any problems providing:
___ ___ 1-housing, 2-food, 3-clothing, 4-utilities, 5-other? __________________________________
___ ___ Do you have any legal issues?____________________________________________
49. 43
YES NO General Health
___ ___ Do you need health insurance for yourself?
___ ___ If no: Health insurance: _______________________________________________________
___ ___ Do you need a family doctor?
___ ___ If no: Family doctor’s name ____________________________________________________
___ ___ Do you need a dentist?
___ ___ If no: Dentist’s name __________________________________________________________
If you don’t have a family doctor, where do you get your care?
1-ER, 2-Urgent Care, 3-Walk-in Clinic, 4-Other ______________________________________________
Previous illnesses:____________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Previous surgeries and hospitalizations:_____________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Allergies: ____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
YES NO Current Medical Issues
___ ___ Are you currently being treated for any of the following conditions?
___ ___ 1-infections, 2-asthma, 3-chronic medical conditions, 4-mental health conditions,
___ ___ 5-mental retardation, 6-developmental disabilities or delays, 7-other: ________________
____________________________________________________________________________
___ ___ Are you taking any medicines?
___ ___ 1-prescribed by your doctor, 2-over the counter, 3-herbal or alternatives, 4-other_______
___ ___ List all medications: __________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
YES NO Safety and Emotional Health
___ ___ Do you use tobacco products?
___ ___ Does anyone smoke in your home?
___ ___ Do you drink alcohol?
___ ___ Do you use other substances?
___ ___ Are you stressed?
___ ___ Are you feeling depressed?
___ ___ Have you experienced emotional, verbal, or physical abuse?
___ ___ Do you have a working smoke detector?
___ ___ Are there any safety concerns in the home?
___ ___ Describe: ___________________________________________________________________
___ ___ Is there a gun in the home? If yes, is the gun locked? Yes___ No___
___ ___ Are there any pets in the home?
___ ___ If children at home, ask: Do you read to your child(ren)?
___ ___ If yes, how often?_______________________________________________________
50. 44
List all other agencies that you are working with now:
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
NOTES
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Please add the following Pathway(s): (Represents the request from the care coordination
agency to the HUB to add pathways to the Care Coordination Plan and tracking. List of Pathways
here represents local set.
__ Adult Education
__ Chemical Dependency
__ Depression
__ Employment
__ Family Planning
__ Family Violence
__ Health Insurance
__ Immunization Screening
__ Immunization Referral
__ Lead
__ Medical Referral ____________________________________________________________________
__ Medication Assessment
__ Medication Management
__ Pregnancy
__ Postpartum
__ Smoking Cessation
__ Social Service Referral _______________________________________________________________
__ Suitable Housing
__ Other: _____________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
Next home visit date: ________________________________________________________________