The Precision Toothbrush
Case study
What is Colgate -Palmolive ?
• Colgate –Palmolive company is an American worldwide consumer
products company focused on production, distribution and provision
of household, health care and personal care products such as oral
hygiene products, soaps and detergents
• With 1991 sales of $6.06 billion and gross profit of $2.76 billion
Colgate-palmolivebecame a global leader in household and personal
care products
What is the case about?
• In 1992 august Colgate was poised to release a new toothbrush in the
United States initially named Colgate precision
• And now the company is facing high competition in the market it has
been developing this superior product for three years
Objectives of the case
• To study the market competition faced by Colgate precision
toothbrush
• To study the consumer behavior towards toothbrush market
• To study the strategies that can be used to position the
Colgate precision in the market
• To analyze the profits gained by adopting different strategies
Key Players
•Susan Steinberg (Precision Product Manager)
•Reuben Mark (CEO Colgate Palmolive)
•Nigel Burton ( Division General Manager)
•John Phillips (Colgate Plus manager)
Operating statements for cp's u.s
toothbrush business
Situational analysis (1/3)
• Cp launched precision as line extension
• Facing tough competition from other firms
• Developing strategies for positioning, branding,communication
Us toothbrush market (2/3)
Consumer behavior (3/3)
Three Issues
• 1 How Precision should be positioned, branded and
communicated to consumers?
• 2 What the advertising and promotion budget should be and
how it should be broken down?
• 3 How to develop a profit and loss pro forma that would
enable Precision toothbrush to reach its full potential?
Product design and testing
• In laboratory, experiments researches used infrared motion analysis
to track consumers brushing movements and consequent levels of
plaque removal with this knowledge and through computer aided
design. Cp designed unique brush with bristles of three different
lengths
How precision should be positioned and
communicated with customers?
• Two ways of positioning
• Mainstream positioning
• Niche positioning
Pros and cons for Niche marketing
• Pros
• 1 Less damage to Colgate plus
• 2 Colgate enter into premium category
• 3 It can be later broadened into mainstream
• Cons
• Less contribution to profit in future years
Pros and cons for Mainstream marketing
• Pros
• 1 Unsatisfied demand may create perception of "hot product"
• 2 Net profit increases
• Cons
• 1 Greater erosion of Colgate
• 2 It has to terminate slow moving children brush from plus
line
Capacity and investment costs
• Raw materials required for production are
• Tufters
• Handle molds and packaging machinery
Production cost and pricing
• Production was given to anchor brush who also manufactures
Colgate plus line of toothbrushes
Branding
• Out of many names proposed "Colgate precision" got 49% of
votes
• Debate on whether to market it as Colgate precision or
precision
• If Colgate precision was used cannibalization of plus would
increase by 20%
• If precision is used remains unchanged
Communication and Promotion
• Special coupons: A 50%-off offer on any size of Colgate toothpaste
in conjunction with a 50¢ coupon on the Precision brush in strong
Colgate markets.
• Buy 1 get 1 bundling:A free 5 oz. tube of Colgate toothpaste with
the purchase of a Precision brush in strong competitive markets
• Concept tests: Once the basic product design was established,
four concept tests, conducted among 400 adult professional brush
users 18 to 54 years of age, were run during 1990-1991.
Consumers were exposed to various product claims in prototype
print advertisements and then asked about the likelihood that they
would purchase the product
What the advertisement and promotion
budget should be and how it is broken
down?
• Insights From Advertising and Promotion
Media expenditures
Television and advertising copy
strategies
Colgate plus advertising
Advertising and promotion
expenditures
But how the budget is broken?
The budget should be broken down by
following ways :- •Department or
Category Budget
• Media selection
• Proper planning
• Monitoring
Competition
Toothbrush innovations
Toothbrush prices
Dollar market share
Dollar market share by class of trade
Conclusion
• At first the precision should be niche marketed and after achieving
maximum productivity requirements it can be mainstream positioned
• In niche positioning it enjoys high price and after achieving sufficient
amount of production capacity it can be changed
• Precision by Colgate is better name because it doesn't effect sales of
Colgate plus
• Price Precision at competitive levels within the super-premium segment so
as to offer more value than competitors, for an equivalent cost
• Leverage their existing intensive distribution channel relationships to
ensure that Precision receives the most effective placement
Disclaimer
• Created by Lakshmi Narayana, CBIT Hyderabad during a marketing
internship under professor Sameer Mathur, IIM Lucknow

Colgate palmolive the precision toothbrush

  • 1.
  • 2.
    What is Colgate-Palmolive ? • Colgate –Palmolive company is an American worldwide consumer products company focused on production, distribution and provision of household, health care and personal care products such as oral hygiene products, soaps and detergents • With 1991 sales of $6.06 billion and gross profit of $2.76 billion Colgate-palmolivebecame a global leader in household and personal care products
  • 3.
    What is thecase about? • In 1992 august Colgate was poised to release a new toothbrush in the United States initially named Colgate precision • And now the company is facing high competition in the market it has been developing this superior product for three years
  • 4.
    Objectives of thecase • To study the market competition faced by Colgate precision toothbrush • To study the consumer behavior towards toothbrush market • To study the strategies that can be used to position the Colgate precision in the market • To analyze the profits gained by adopting different strategies
  • 5.
    Key Players •Susan Steinberg(Precision Product Manager) •Reuben Mark (CEO Colgate Palmolive) •Nigel Burton ( Division General Manager) •John Phillips (Colgate Plus manager)
  • 6.
    Operating statements forcp's u.s toothbrush business
  • 7.
    Situational analysis (1/3) •Cp launched precision as line extension • Facing tough competition from other firms • Developing strategies for positioning, branding,communication
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
    Three Issues • 1How Precision should be positioned, branded and communicated to consumers? • 2 What the advertising and promotion budget should be and how it should be broken down? • 3 How to develop a profit and loss pro forma that would enable Precision toothbrush to reach its full potential?
  • 11.
    Product design andtesting • In laboratory, experiments researches used infrared motion analysis to track consumers brushing movements and consequent levels of plaque removal with this knowledge and through computer aided design. Cp designed unique brush with bristles of three different lengths
  • 12.
    How precision shouldbe positioned and communicated with customers? • Two ways of positioning • Mainstream positioning • Niche positioning
  • 13.
    Pros and consfor Niche marketing • Pros • 1 Less damage to Colgate plus • 2 Colgate enter into premium category • 3 It can be later broadened into mainstream • Cons • Less contribution to profit in future years
  • 14.
    Pros and consfor Mainstream marketing • Pros • 1 Unsatisfied demand may create perception of "hot product" • 2 Net profit increases • Cons • 1 Greater erosion of Colgate • 2 It has to terminate slow moving children brush from plus line
  • 15.
    Capacity and investmentcosts • Raw materials required for production are • Tufters • Handle molds and packaging machinery
  • 16.
    Production cost andpricing • Production was given to anchor brush who also manufactures Colgate plus line of toothbrushes
  • 17.
    Branding • Out ofmany names proposed "Colgate precision" got 49% of votes • Debate on whether to market it as Colgate precision or precision • If Colgate precision was used cannibalization of plus would increase by 20% • If precision is used remains unchanged
  • 18.
    Communication and Promotion •Special coupons: A 50%-off offer on any size of Colgate toothpaste in conjunction with a 50¢ coupon on the Precision brush in strong Colgate markets. • Buy 1 get 1 bundling:A free 5 oz. tube of Colgate toothpaste with the purchase of a Precision brush in strong competitive markets • Concept tests: Once the basic product design was established, four concept tests, conducted among 400 adult professional brush users 18 to 54 years of age, were run during 1990-1991. Consumers were exposed to various product claims in prototype print advertisements and then asked about the likelihood that they would purchase the product
  • 20.
    What the advertisementand promotion budget should be and how it is broken down? • Insights From Advertising and Promotion
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
    But how thebudget is broken?
  • 26.
    The budget shouldbe broken down by following ways :- •Department or Category Budget • Media selection • Proper planning • Monitoring
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
    Dollar market shareby class of trade
  • 32.
    Conclusion • At firstthe precision should be niche marketed and after achieving maximum productivity requirements it can be mainstream positioned • In niche positioning it enjoys high price and after achieving sufficient amount of production capacity it can be changed • Precision by Colgate is better name because it doesn't effect sales of Colgate plus • Price Precision at competitive levels within the super-premium segment so as to offer more value than competitors, for an equivalent cost • Leverage their existing intensive distribution channel relationships to ensure that Precision receives the most effective placement
  • 34.
    Disclaimer • Created byLakshmi Narayana, CBIT Hyderabad during a marketing internship under professor Sameer Mathur, IIM Lucknow