This document summarizes research on trends in driving licence uptake in the UK and examines potential inequalities. It finds that while licence holding has increased over time and converged between men and women born in the 1950s-1960s, it has declined slightly for those born after the 1970s, especially for men. Licence holding is lower in urban versus rural areas but shows similar age effects between genders. Social class strongly influences trends, with the largest declines seen in lower social classes. The researchers conclude that while increased gender parity may reflect choice, period effects among younger cohorts and differences by social class and location point to economic constraints as a bigger factor in declining mobility.
Millennial is a State of Mind - Zipcar 2015 Millennial Survey ResultsZipcar_PR
Zipcar, the world’s leading car sharing network, released its fifth annual independent study which examines millennials’ (18-34 year olds) attitudes towards transportation, technology and lifestyle compared to older generations. This year, Zipcar analyzed the results by the geographic area in which respondents live and found, surprisingly, that city-dwellers of all ages displayed attitudes strikingly similar to those of millennials whereas suburban and rural residents did not. These results suggest that ‘millennial’ in the U.S. is more a state of mind, related not just to age, but to city-living. Conversely, suburban and rural respondents of all ages responded dissimilarly.
Defining the Urban Boomer - Presented by ZipcarZipcar_PR
Zipcar, the world’s leading car sharing network, released its first independent study examining the attitudes and lifestyle of “Urban Boomers,” a demographic cohort of adults who live in urban areas and who are ages 50 to 69, part of the “baby boomer” generation. The study, conducted by KRC Research, revealed that Urban Boomers in the U.S. are tech-savvy, highly active, and while many still own a car, they are driving less after moving to the city.
[Slides] Equity in Motion: Bikeshare in Low-Income CommunitiesAysha Cohen
Overview of emerging trends, challenges, analysis, findings and recommendations from my UCLA Capstone research for the District Department of Transportation (DDOT) entitled, "Equity in Motion: Bikeshare in Low-Income Communities". Presented at "Transportation Techies" at WeWork Crystal City on 11/3.
Leveraging Vision Zero and Black Lives Matter to Achieve Transportation Safet...Amanda Leahy
Pecha Kucha presented by Amanda Leahy at Pro Walk Pro Bike Pro Place 2016 in Vancouver, BC. Includes speaker notes.
Describes connection between Vision Zero and Black Lives Matter Movement (and Campaign Zero), discusses trajectory of transportation safety inequity and disproportionate impact of traffic fatalities/injuries on low income and communities of color, emphasizes importance of prioritizing social and environmental justice and a systematic approach to initiatives targeting traffic safety
Millennial is a State of Mind - Zipcar 2015 Millennial Survey ResultsZipcar_PR
Zipcar, the world’s leading car sharing network, released its fifth annual independent study which examines millennials’ (18-34 year olds) attitudes towards transportation, technology and lifestyle compared to older generations. This year, Zipcar analyzed the results by the geographic area in which respondents live and found, surprisingly, that city-dwellers of all ages displayed attitudes strikingly similar to those of millennials whereas suburban and rural residents did not. These results suggest that ‘millennial’ in the U.S. is more a state of mind, related not just to age, but to city-living. Conversely, suburban and rural respondents of all ages responded dissimilarly.
Defining the Urban Boomer - Presented by ZipcarZipcar_PR
Zipcar, the world’s leading car sharing network, released its first independent study examining the attitudes and lifestyle of “Urban Boomers,” a demographic cohort of adults who live in urban areas and who are ages 50 to 69, part of the “baby boomer” generation. The study, conducted by KRC Research, revealed that Urban Boomers in the U.S. are tech-savvy, highly active, and while many still own a car, they are driving less after moving to the city.
[Slides] Equity in Motion: Bikeshare in Low-Income CommunitiesAysha Cohen
Overview of emerging trends, challenges, analysis, findings and recommendations from my UCLA Capstone research for the District Department of Transportation (DDOT) entitled, "Equity in Motion: Bikeshare in Low-Income Communities". Presented at "Transportation Techies" at WeWork Crystal City on 11/3.
Leveraging Vision Zero and Black Lives Matter to Achieve Transportation Safet...Amanda Leahy
Pecha Kucha presented by Amanda Leahy at Pro Walk Pro Bike Pro Place 2016 in Vancouver, BC. Includes speaker notes.
Describes connection between Vision Zero and Black Lives Matter Movement (and Campaign Zero), discusses trajectory of transportation safety inequity and disproportionate impact of traffic fatalities/injuries on low income and communities of color, emphasizes importance of prioritizing social and environmental justice and a systematic approach to initiatives targeting traffic safety
2010 Thomson, Leopkey, Schlenker and Schulenkorf Event Legacies Alana Thomson
Thomson, A., Leopkey, B., Schlenker, K., & Schulenkorf, N. (2010). Sport Event Legacies: Implications for Meaningful Legacy Outcomes. Paper presented at the Global Events Congress IV, UK Centre for Events Management, Leeds University, UK, 14-16 July 2010.
This presentation is a Master plan for the Inner Sunset neighborhood in San Francisco. The presentation focuses on improving pedestrian safety, greening, and neighborhood beautification. The proposal creates three distinct yet related squares along a commercial corridor, Translink, Commerical Square and Gateway into Golden Gate Park.
Greg Olsen, Division of Policy, Research and Legislative Affairs, State Office for the Aging
This presentation focuses on broad transportation challenges of older adults, transportation we provide through NYSOFA and area agencies on aging and what NY Connects has been doing to address the issue locally where transportation gaps exist.
2010 Thomson, Leopkey, Schlenker and Schulenkorf Event Legacies Alana Thomson
Thomson, A., Leopkey, B., Schlenker, K., & Schulenkorf, N. (2010). Sport Event Legacies: Implications for Meaningful Legacy Outcomes. Paper presented at the Global Events Congress IV, UK Centre for Events Management, Leeds University, UK, 14-16 July 2010.
This presentation is a Master plan for the Inner Sunset neighborhood in San Francisco. The presentation focuses on improving pedestrian safety, greening, and neighborhood beautification. The proposal creates three distinct yet related squares along a commercial corridor, Translink, Commerical Square and Gateway into Golden Gate Park.
Greg Olsen, Division of Policy, Research and Legislative Affairs, State Office for the Aging
This presentation focuses on broad transportation challenges of older adults, transportation we provide through NYSOFA and area agencies on aging and what NY Connects has been doing to address the issue locally where transportation gaps exist.
Transportation and the New Generation: Why Young People Are Driving Less and ...The Rockefeller Foundation
The trend away from driving has been led by young people. From 2001 to 2009, the average annual number of vehicle miles traveled by young people (16 to 34-year-olds) decreased from 10,300 miles to 7,900 miles per capita—a drop of 23 percent. The trend away from steady growth in driving is likely to belong-lasting—even once the economy recovers. Young people are driving less for a host of reasons—higher gas prices, new licensing laws, improvements in technology that support alternative transportation, and changes in Generation Y’s values and preferences—all factors that are likely to have an impact for years to come.
Almost half of all 18 to 34-year-old drivers are driving less, and nearly two-thirds would drive less if alternative transportation options were available, according to an independent study commissioned by Zipcar, Inc., the world's largest car sharing service.
The study of licensed drivers conducted in October by KRC Research revealed that 45 percent of Millennials (ages 18 to 34) said they had consciously made an effort to reduce how much they drive, and 64 percent would drive less if alternative options including public transportation, car sharing or convenient carpooling (ridesharing) were available in their area.
Presentation by ITS' Dr Karen Lucas - keynote speaker at the 5th International Conference on Women’s Issues in Transportation (WIiT).
http://wiit-paris2014.sciencesconf.org/?lang=en
http://wiit-paris2014.sciencesconf.org/conference/wiit-paris2014/pages/Day_Two_Newsletter_1.pdf
www.its.leeds.ac.uk/people/k.lucas
Transportation and the New Generation: Why Young People are Driving Less and...Jesse Budlong
From World War II until just a few years ago, the number of miles driven annually on America’s roads steadily increased. Then, at the turn of the century, something changed: Americans began driving less. By 2011, the average American was driving 6 percent fewer miles per year than in 2004.
The trend away from driving has been led by young people. From 2001 and 2009, the average annual number of vehicle-miles traveled by young people (16 to 34-year-olds) decreased from 10,300 miles to 7,900 miles per capita – a drop of 23 percent. The trend away from steady growth in driving is likely to be long-lasting – even once the economy recovers. Young people are driving less for a host of reasons – higher gas prices, new licensing laws, improvements in technology that support alternative transportation, and changes in Generation Y’s values and preferences – all factors that are likely to have an impact for years to come.
Federal and local governments have historically made massive investments in new highway capacity on the assumption that driving will continue to increase at a rapid and steady pace. The changing transportation preferences of young people – and Americans overall – throw those assumptions into doubt. The time has come for transportation policy to reflect the needs and desires of today’s Americans – not the worn-out conventional wisdom from days gone by.
The recession has played a role in reducing the miles driven in America, especially by young people. People who are unemployed or underemployed have difficulty affording cars, commute to work less frequently if at all, and have less disposable income to spend on traveling for vacation and other entertainment. The trend toward reduced driving, however, has occurred even among young people who are employed and/or are doing well financially.
America has long created transportation policy under the assumption that driving will continue to increase at a rapid and steady rate. The changing transportation preferences of young people – and Americans overall – throw that assumption into doubt. Policy-makers and the public need to be aware that America’s current transportation policy – dominated by road building – is fundamentally out-of-step with the transportation patterns and expressed preferences of growing numbers of Americans. It is time for policy-makers to consider the implication of changes in driving habits for the nation’s transportation infrastructure decisions and funding practices, and consider a new vision for transportation policy that reflects the needs of 21st century America.
Turning Tough Around: Skills for Managing Critics AICP CM 1.5
Critics. Tough crowds. We've all faced them! Imagine turning those critics into supporters -- or at least respectful, constructive participants in your projects. Learn how to set up your team for success by carefully structuring meetings and messages. Explore ways to manage difficult crowds and sticky situations while still building long-term relationships and agency credibility. Hear stories and strategies from people who've survived -- and even thrive on -- divisive public processes.
Moderator: Allison Brooks, Director, Bay Area Joint Policy Center, Oakland, California
Ken Snyder, CEO/President, PlaceMatters, Denver, Colorado
David A Goldberg, Communications Director, Transportation For America, Washington, DC
Salima (Sam) O'Connell, Public Involvement Manager, Metro Transit, St. Louis Park, Minnesota
Analytical Writing is an English Writing topic which is one of the hardest Writing topics but this PPT will help you a lot to improve. This includes all the rules and tips for interpreting a pie chart
Future of driving launch event - Presentation slides ILC- UK
This project is seeking to understand what the social impact of these technological developments may be in the context of an ageing society, looking at aspects of lived experience, public health and mobility.
Lyft in a New Era of Technology-Enabled Mobility: Implications for Policy and...Emily Castor
Over the last two and a half years, Lyft has achieved mass adoption extremely quickly, heralding a new era of consumer transportation behavior based on smartphones and “access over ownership.” Now, as Lyft begins to mature, it is reaching the density necessary to achieve real-time dynamic carpooling, with major implications for congestion reduction and environmental benefit.
This presentation provides insight into the development of this new industry, how it will impact mobility and consumer behavior, and the implications for transportation planners and policymakers as Lyft continues to evolve.
3. +
• Car miles per person
stabilising
• Fall in young adults holding
a driving licence
Declining mobility Applying an
‘equalities’ lens
Choice?
Constraint?
• Technological change
• ‘Urban renaissance’
• Lifestyle/ consumer
preference issues
Choice?
• Precarity in employment
• Increased entry and
maintenance costs
Constraint?
4. +
• Car miles per person
stabilising
• Fall in young adults holding
a driving licence
Declining mobility Applying an
‘equalities’ lens
Choice?
Constraint?
5. +
Aim
• Gender
• Urbanisation
• Social Class
To gain greater
understanding
of overall trends
driving licence
holding and car
use
Are these trends
temporary or do they
signal longer term
change?
What might the equity
implications of such
changes be?
6. Panel data, rather than
cross-sectional snapshots
BHPS established 1991
10,000 people in 5,050 hhds
Merged with Understanding Society in
2010/11
Combines questions on car access
with extensive socio-economic data
Approach
Licence holding & car access:
Examination of age, period & cohort effects
by gender, social class and urbanisation.
Figure from Schöley & Willekens (2015: 3)
7. Licenced Drivers driving
Gender
- Baby boomers
(Born 1946-1964 – male!)
- Pronounced historic
cohort effects in licence
uptake for women
8. Licenced Drivers driving
Gender
- Baby boomers
(Born 1946-1964 – male!)
- Pronounced historic
cohort effects in licence
uptake for women
10. Licenced Drivers driving
Gender: 50s/60s
cohorts
- Female ‘catch up’
towards parity in
licence holding for
women born in 1950s
- Convergence for
cohorts born in 1960s
(nearer 90%+ driving
licence ownership for
both genders in these
cohorts)
Lower
Mobility
Higher
Mobility
11. Licenced Drivers driving
Gender & the
Millennials
- For cohorts born after
around 1970, licence
levels fell around 10%
for both genders
- They fell further for
those born after
around 1980s (Early
Millennials?), and
faster for men
- Licence gap closing
Lower
Mobility
Lower
Mobility
13. Licenced Drivers driving
Gender
- Historic cohort effects
for both genders
- More consistency (age
effect) at younger
ages (approx 17-30)
years
Born 1915
Born 1928
Born 1935
Born 1955
14. Licenced Drivers driving
Gender gap
in converting
licence to
opportunity
BUT
more
consistent
age effect
between
genders for
drivers
driving
15. Licenced
Driversdriving
Urban/ Non-urban
- Gender differences
more marked in urban
areas
- Choice: more
alternative modes
available in highly
urbanised areas?
- Constraint: risk of
forced car ownership in
less urban
environments?
Urban
Non-
Urban
Maybe
women just
don’t like
driving??
16. Licenced
Driversdriving
Non-Urban
- Close to 100% for rural
males
- Earlier female-male
cohort ‘catch up’ than
for more urban
counterparts
- A decline for the
millennial cohort (less
pronounced than for
urban males)
Urban
Non-
Urban
17. Licenced
Driversdriving
Urban
- Older urban women, 10-
20% lower licence-
holding than men of the
same age
- Some catch up for the
1970s - 80s cohorts
(<40yrs in 1995)
- Declining for both from
mid-1970s onwards
Urban
Non-
Urban
More consistency
between genders at
younger ages
(approx 17-30) years
21. Licenced
Driversdriving
High
Low
Medium
Social Class
- Some ‘catch up’ for
women with
intermediate
qualifications for the
1945-1970 cohorts
(much weaker evidence
for women in the lowest
category)
- Recent declining
licence holding for men
most apparent in low-
intermediate groups
22. Licenced
Driversdriving
Low
Medium
High
Social Class
- The historic trend
towards successive
cohorts with driving
licences driving
(around 1940) is most
clearly evident in those
with low qualifications,
especially women
- Evident to a lesser
extent with the
intermediate but not the
high group
24. Licenced
Driversdriving
Low
Medium
High
Social Class
- The greatest period-
based change, (early
2000s) shows increased
proportions of
women born
1945-1970
driving, is
clearest in the
intermediate
category,
although
apparent
elsewhere.
26. + Implications
Applying an
‘equalities’ lens
Choice?
Constraint?
Gender:
• increased gender parity in
licence and driving; cultural
(choice)
• period effect with millenials
(economic insecurity, mostly
male, constraint)
Urbanisation:
• Less need to drive in urban areas
BUT male/ female differential
suggests still very desirable and
possibly necessary for many
Social class:
• Strong mediation by social class
and period effect for intermediate
women indicates constraint rather
than choice as the key factor in
lower mobility
27. +
Driving segregation: Driving
licence uptake & emerging
inequalities
Julie Clark & Jon Minton
University of Glasgow
Thank you!
Social Class
Gender Choice
Constraint