KUMAR ORGANIC PRODUCTS LIMITED
                           Comparative Test Report
Product Name: Triclosan

Sample Qty : 40gms

Code No. : UVWCHN – 01

         Item of Test             Requirement       Chinese             Chinese Sample as       Kumar’s
                                  of USP – 34       Sample              per Party’s Test        Sample
                                                    Analysed in         Report Received
                                                    Kumar               (No. 20020110)
 Assay                             99.0 – 100%           99.78%                99.85%             99.84%
 Water                              NMT 0.1%             < 0.1%                 0.05%              <0.1%
 Residue on ignition                NMT 0.1%             < 0.1%                 0.05%              <0.1%
 Heavy metals                      NMT 20 ppm           < 20ppm                0.8 ppm            <20ppm
 Melting Point                       57 + 1OC          56.5-57.8OC          56.5 – 57.8 OC         58OC
 4 – Chlorophenol                    < 50 ppm          0.8668 ppm            <0.001ng/kg        0.8132 ppm
 2,4 – Dichlorophenol                < 10 ppm          3.9470 ppm            <0.001ng/kg        2.3111ppm
 2,8 – Dichlorodibenzofuran         < 0.5 ppm          0.0379 ppm            <0.001ng/kg        0.0120 ppm
 2,8 – Dichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin     < 0.25 ppm         0.4240 ppm           Not Specified       0.0582 ppm
 2,4,8 – Trichlorodibenzofuran      < 0.5 ppm          3.1660 ppm            <0.001ng/kg        0.1069 ppm
 1,3,7 – Trichlorodibenzo-p-        < 0.25 ppm         Not detected         Not Specified       Not detected
 dioxin
 2,3,7,8 –                             < 1ppt         Not Analysed           <0.001ng/kg           <1ppt
 Tetrachlorodibenzofuran
 2,3,7,8 – Tetrachlorodibenzo-         < 1ppt         Not Analysed           <0.001ng/kg           <1ppt
 p-dioxin

Remarks:
The above table shows that the Chinese sample doesn’t conform to USP Specification as it fails
in the initial analysis through HPLC as below.
    1) 2,8 – Dichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin should be < 0.25 ppm, but obtained was 0.4240 ppm which is not
       comparable with Kumar’s Triclosan sample
   2) 2,4,8 – Trichlorodibenzofuran should be < 0.5 ppm, but obtained was 3.1660 ppm which is
       approximately 30 times more than Kumar’s sample.
Since the sample was failing in HPLC, it has not taken for further analysis for impurities of
2,3,7,8TCDF & 2,3,7,8TCDD through GC-MS as higher concentration of these impurities will
cause problem to the column. It was observed that in the test report No. 20020110 all the
Organic impurities were reported as <0.001ng/kgwhich doesn’t conform to the USP
Specification. 2,8 – Dichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and 1,3,7 – Trichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin were
not specified in the test report received along with the sample.

Chinese tcs sample report

  • 1.
    KUMAR ORGANIC PRODUCTSLIMITED Comparative Test Report Product Name: Triclosan Sample Qty : 40gms Code No. : UVWCHN – 01 Item of Test Requirement Chinese Chinese Sample as Kumar’s of USP – 34 Sample per Party’s Test Sample Analysed in Report Received Kumar (No. 20020110) Assay 99.0 – 100% 99.78% 99.85% 99.84% Water NMT 0.1% < 0.1% 0.05% <0.1% Residue on ignition NMT 0.1% < 0.1% 0.05% <0.1% Heavy metals NMT 20 ppm < 20ppm 0.8 ppm <20ppm Melting Point 57 + 1OC 56.5-57.8OC 56.5 – 57.8 OC 58OC 4 – Chlorophenol < 50 ppm 0.8668 ppm <0.001ng/kg 0.8132 ppm 2,4 – Dichlorophenol < 10 ppm 3.9470 ppm <0.001ng/kg 2.3111ppm 2,8 – Dichlorodibenzofuran < 0.5 ppm 0.0379 ppm <0.001ng/kg 0.0120 ppm 2,8 – Dichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin < 0.25 ppm 0.4240 ppm Not Specified 0.0582 ppm 2,4,8 – Trichlorodibenzofuran < 0.5 ppm 3.1660 ppm <0.001ng/kg 0.1069 ppm 1,3,7 – Trichlorodibenzo-p- < 0.25 ppm Not detected Not Specified Not detected dioxin 2,3,7,8 – < 1ppt Not Analysed <0.001ng/kg <1ppt Tetrachlorodibenzofuran 2,3,7,8 – Tetrachlorodibenzo- < 1ppt Not Analysed <0.001ng/kg <1ppt p-dioxin Remarks: The above table shows that the Chinese sample doesn’t conform to USP Specification as it fails in the initial analysis through HPLC as below. 1) 2,8 – Dichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin should be < 0.25 ppm, but obtained was 0.4240 ppm which is not comparable with Kumar’s Triclosan sample 2) 2,4,8 – Trichlorodibenzofuran should be < 0.5 ppm, but obtained was 3.1660 ppm which is approximately 30 times more than Kumar’s sample. Since the sample was failing in HPLC, it has not taken for further analysis for impurities of 2,3,7,8TCDF & 2,3,7,8TCDD through GC-MS as higher concentration of these impurities will cause problem to the column. It was observed that in the test report No. 20020110 all the Organic impurities were reported as <0.001ng/kgwhich doesn’t conform to the USP Specification. 2,8 – Dichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and 1,3,7 – Trichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin were not specified in the test report received along with the sample.