Here are the six basic steps of an appeal:
1. Notice of Appeal - The losing party files a notice of appeal with the trial court clerk.
2. Record on Appeal - The clerk prepares the record of documents and transcripts from the trial for the appeals court.
3. Appellant's Brief - The appellant files a brief explaining any errors made in the trial court.
4. Appellee's Brief - The appellee, or opposing party, files a brief responding to the appellant's claimed errors.
5. Oral Argument - Each side may present oral arguments to a panel of appeals judges.
6. Decision - The appeals court issues a written decision either upholding or overturning the lower court's
These tips, pointers and information are intended for persons who must attend for cross-examination or examination for discovery in a civil proceeding in Ontario. There are some procedural differences between cross-examination and discovery but generally, preparation for the examination is the same.
CHAPTER 8 The TrialIntroductionFirst live, nat.docxtiffanyd4
CHAPTER 8
The Trial
IntroductionFirst live, nationally televised trial in the United States occurred in 1991William Kennedy SmithAllowed public to watch entire trial process from jury selection through verdict
Until then, public’s beliefs about trial process based on fictional TV trials
The Trial Process
Pretrial MotionsWritten or oral requests to the judge
Ask judge to make a ruling or order that action be taken in favor of the applicant
Made before opening statements or presentation of evidence
Types of MotionsDismissal of chargesNolle prosequi
Change of venue
Severance of defendants
Severance of charges
DiscoveryBill of particulars
Suppression of evidence
Intention to provide an alibi
Determination of competency
Continuance
The Right to a Speedy, Public, and Fair TrialSixth Amendment:
“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury”
Key questions:How soon after arrest must a trial be held?How much access should the public have?How do we ensure that the jury is untainted by prejudice?
The Right to a Speedy Trial“Justice delayed is justice denied”
Seriousness of charge has the greatest influence on length of case processing
Defining the Limits of a Speedy TrialFederal/state governments have established rules limiting time between arrest and trial
Barker v. Wingo – continuances do not necessarily infringe defendant’s right to speedy trial
Speedy trial rules only affect time between arrest and start of trial
The Courts, the Public, and the PressSixth Amendment guarantees right to a public trialIntended to ensure that accused is treated fairly by government by giving public full access to information regarding proceedingsDoes not define what makes a trial “public”
Public trial means one that the public is free to attendLimits on number of people allowed/required determined by courtroom size
Public TrialsPublic’s right to attendGannett Co., Inc. v. DePasquale: public and press could be barred from pretrial hearingsCourt has ruled that press and public should not be excluded from jury selection stage
Freedom of press and pretrial publicityGag orders may be issued by judges in high-profile casesPrior restraint should be used only when absolutely necessaryClear threat to the fairness of trialThreat is posed by the publicity to be restrainedNo less restrictive alternatives are available
Cameras in the CourtroomFlorida first let TV cameras into courts in 1977
All 50 states have rules permitting cameras in courts under certain circumstances
Congress considering legislation that would permit cameras in all federal courts
Bench Trial Versus Jury TrialAbout 80% of defendants convicted at trial are convicted by juries, 20% convicted in bench trial
Reasons to waive jury trialCrime is so heinousUnusual appearance of defendantExcessive media coverageCase is too complexAttorney fees may be lower
Constitutional Right to a Trial JurySixth Amendment guaran.
These tips, pointers and information are intended for persons who must attend for cross-examination or examination for discovery in a civil proceeding in Ontario. There are some procedural differences between cross-examination and discovery but generally, preparation for the examination is the same.
CHAPTER 8 The TrialIntroductionFirst live, nat.docxtiffanyd4
CHAPTER 8
The Trial
IntroductionFirst live, nationally televised trial in the United States occurred in 1991William Kennedy SmithAllowed public to watch entire trial process from jury selection through verdict
Until then, public’s beliefs about trial process based on fictional TV trials
The Trial Process
Pretrial MotionsWritten or oral requests to the judge
Ask judge to make a ruling or order that action be taken in favor of the applicant
Made before opening statements or presentation of evidence
Types of MotionsDismissal of chargesNolle prosequi
Change of venue
Severance of defendants
Severance of charges
DiscoveryBill of particulars
Suppression of evidence
Intention to provide an alibi
Determination of competency
Continuance
The Right to a Speedy, Public, and Fair TrialSixth Amendment:
“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury”
Key questions:How soon after arrest must a trial be held?How much access should the public have?How do we ensure that the jury is untainted by prejudice?
The Right to a Speedy Trial“Justice delayed is justice denied”
Seriousness of charge has the greatest influence on length of case processing
Defining the Limits of a Speedy TrialFederal/state governments have established rules limiting time between arrest and trial
Barker v. Wingo – continuances do not necessarily infringe defendant’s right to speedy trial
Speedy trial rules only affect time between arrest and start of trial
The Courts, the Public, and the PressSixth Amendment guarantees right to a public trialIntended to ensure that accused is treated fairly by government by giving public full access to information regarding proceedingsDoes not define what makes a trial “public”
Public trial means one that the public is free to attendLimits on number of people allowed/required determined by courtroom size
Public TrialsPublic’s right to attendGannett Co., Inc. v. DePasquale: public and press could be barred from pretrial hearingsCourt has ruled that press and public should not be excluded from jury selection stage
Freedom of press and pretrial publicityGag orders may be issued by judges in high-profile casesPrior restraint should be used only when absolutely necessaryClear threat to the fairness of trialThreat is posed by the publicity to be restrainedNo less restrictive alternatives are available
Cameras in the CourtroomFlorida first let TV cameras into courts in 1977
All 50 states have rules permitting cameras in courts under certain circumstances
Congress considering legislation that would permit cameras in all federal courts
Bench Trial Versus Jury TrialAbout 80% of defendants convicted at trial are convicted by juries, 20% convicted in bench trial
Reasons to waive jury trialCrime is so heinousUnusual appearance of defendantExcessive media coverageCase is too complexAttorney fees may be lower
Constitutional Right to a Trial JurySixth Amendment guaran.
What Are A Criminal Trial's Four Phases_.pdfYAKSHITHM
. The judges then determine whether or not to uphold the conviction. Additionally, Rockville Criminal Lawyer could run their firms and manage numerous criminal cases.
LLB LAW NOTES ON LAW OF EVIDENCE
FREE AFFIDAVITS AND NOTICES FORMATS
FREE AGREEMENTS AND CONTRACTS FORMATS
FREE LLB LAW NOTES
FREE CA ICWA NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIRST SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SECOND SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW THIRD SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FOURTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIFTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SIXTH SEM NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FOUNDATION NOTES
FREE CA ICWA INTERMEDIATE NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FINAL NOTES
KANOON KE RAKHWALE INDIA
HIRE LAWYER ONLINE
LAW FIRMS IN DELHI
CA FIRM DELHI
VISIT : https://www.kanoonkerakhwale.com/
VISIT : https://hirelawyeronline.com/
Chapter 21 - The Investigator and the Legal System1.docxwalterl4
Chapter 21 - The Investigator and the Legal System
1
The decisions investigators must make involve a great deal of discretion.
Investigators must consider what may be termed risk factors.
2
Investigators must consider what may be termed risk factors.
Some police officers and criminal investigators are not fully aware of the order in
3
which a trial is conducted because time often prohibits them from attending a
complete trail from beginning to end. Also, witnesses are often sequestered from
the courtroom before and after giving testimony. This very common practice is used
to minimize the possibility that a witness’s testimony might be affected by other
witnesses’ testimony.
The courtroom process begins with the selection and swearing in of a jury. Jury
selection can last a few hours or a few weeks, depending on the selection process
and the nature of the case. The jury panel from whom the jurors in the trial will
eventually be picked is called a venire.
The steps in the trial process include: direct examination, cross-examination,
redirect examination, re-cross examination, the rebuttal, surrebuttal, and closing
arguments.
Evidence can be defined as anything that tends logically to prove or disprove
a fact at issue in a judicial case or controversy.
4
a fact at issue in a judicial case or controversy.
The rules of evidence are designed primarily to keep a jury from hearing or
seeing improper evidence, and the first rule of evidence is designed to set
parameters on the above definition of evidence.
Proof may be defined as the combination of all those facts—of all the evidence—in
5
determining the guilt or innocence of a person accused of a crime.
The pie chart above illustrates how several different pieces of evidence can
be put together in order to constitute proof of guilt.
6
be put together in order to constitute proof of guilt.
The doctrine of judicial notice is an evidentiary shortcut. Judicial notice is designed
7
to speed up the trial and eliminate the necessity of formally proving the truth of a
particular matter when the truth is not in dispute.
Direct Evidence
8
Direct evidence usually is the testimony of witnesses that ties the defendant
directly to the commission of the crime, such as the testimony of an
eyewitness who can positively state that the defendant committed the crime.
Real Evidence
Sometimes referred to as “physical evidence,” real evidence is connected
with the commission of the crime and can be produced in court.
Demonstrative Evidence
Demonstrative, or illustrative, evidence is not identical to real evidence even
though the items introduced are tangible. It consists of maps, diagrams,
sketches, photographs, tape recordings, videotapes, X-rays, and visual tests
and demonstrations produced to assist witnesses in explaining their
testimony.
Circumstantial Evidence
9
It is a myth that one cannot be convicted of a crime solely o.
Be prepared and gain a deeper understanding of Arizona civil lawsuits with this simple to understand guide. An in depth explanation of civil lawsuits in Arizona, including the stages of a lawsuit, and common terminology.
1. P T
RE RIAL
PROCE DURES
AND T E
H
CRIMINAL TRIAL
2. Identify the steps involved in the pretrial criminal
process.
3. The initial appearance is the first step after arrest.
During the appearance, the defendant is:
◦ Informed of the charges
◦ Advised of right to counsel
◦ Told the amount of bail
◦ Given a date for the preliminary hearing
4.
5. Bail is the amount or conditions set by the court to
ensure that the defendant will appear for further
criminal proceedings.
Bail is provided for under the Eighth Amendment.
In most cases, the defendant will only be released if
he/she posts bail.
Bail is generally prohibited in capital cases.
6. The Preliminary Hearing – an initial hearing in which a
magistrate decides if there is probable cause to believe
that the defendant committed the crime with which he/she
is charged
◦ The Preliminary Hearing Process
◦ Waiving the Hearing
The Grand Jury – the group of citizens called to decide
whether probable cause exists to believe that a suspect
committed the crime with which she/he has been charged
7. Case Attrition – the process through which prosecutors,
by deciding whether to prosecute each person arrested,
effect an overall reduction in the number of persons
prosecuted
◦ Scarce Resources
8.
9. Explain how a prosecutor screens potential cases.
10. Screening Factors:
◦ Belief in the guilt of the suspect
◦ Case priorities
◦ Uncooperative victims
◦ Unreliability of victims
◦ Defendant who is willing to testify against other offenders
11. At the arraignment, defendants must file a plea:
Guilty
Not Guilty
Nolo Contendre
12. Motivations for Plea Bargaining
◦ Prosecutors and Plea Bargaining - want a conviction
◦ Defense Attorneys and Plea Bargaining - want the best
outcome for the defendant
◦ Defendants and Plea Bargaining - want some measure
of control over the outcome and a lighter sentence
◦ Victims and Plea Bargaining – about half of the states
permit for victim participation in plea bargaining
13.
14. Identify the basic protections enjoyed by criminal
defendants in the United States.
15. Speedy Trial:
Required by the Sixth Amendment
Barker vs. Wingo (1972)
All 50 states have their own speedy-trial statutes
The Speedy Trial Act of 1974 (federal)
◦ No more than 30 days between arrest and indictment
◦ No more than 10 days between indictment and arraignment
◦ No more than 60 days between arraignment and trial
16. Role of the Jury:
Sixth Amendment guarantees an “impartial” jury
Duncan vs.. Louisiana (1968)
Jury size
Unanimity – most states require a unanimous
verdict
17. Explain what “taking the Fifth” really means.
18. The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination:
Provided for in the Fifth Amendment
Witnesses are granted immunity
Adamson vs.. California (1947), the decision to “take the
Fifth” should not prejudice the jury
“Taking the Fifth” means that a witness may refuse to
testify if such testimony may be self-incriminating
19. Defendants are The standard of proof
presumed innocent in criminal court is
until proven guilty beyond a reasonable
doubt
20. All those chosen from the master list are
summoned to appear. This group, from which
the jury will be selected, is called the Venire.
The attorneys then determine the suitability of
each potential juror through a questioning period
called Voir Dire.
21. Contrast challenges for cause and peremptory
challenges during voir dire.
22. There are two ways jurors are excluded:
Challenges for Cause
◦ The attorney must provide a sound, legally justifiable
reason why a juror cannot serve
Peremptory Challenges
◦ The attorney can remove a juror without showing and
supporting reason or cause
◦ Batson vs.. Kentucky (1986)
23. Opening Statements:
The first step of the trial process.
The prosecutor speaks first, followed by defense
counsel.
Each side attempts to construct a “road map” of
their case for the jury to follow by outlining their
evidence.
24. Explain the difference between testimony and real
evidence, between lay witnesses and expert
witnesses, and between direct evidence and
circumstantial evidence.
25. Testimony is verbal Real evidence is
evidence given by brought into court and
witnesses under oath. seen by the jury, as
opposed to evidence
that is described for a
jury.
26. Lay witnesses are Expert witnesses are
those who can those with
truthfully and professional training
accurately testify on a or substantial
fact in question experience qualifying
without having her/him to testify on a
specialized training or certain subject.
knowledge; an
ordinary witness.
27. Direct evidence is Circumstantial
evidence that evidence is indirect
establishes the evidence that is
existence of a fact offered to establish,
that is in question by inference, the
without relying on likelihood of a fact
inference. that is in question.
28. The Prosecution’s Case:
Burden of proof is on the state.
Attempts to establish corpus delicti.
Calls witnesses for direct examination.
◦ Establishes relevance and competency of witnesses.
◦ Avoids hearsay.
◦ After cross-examination, prosecutor will have one more
opportunity during redirect examination.
29.
30. Questions:
◦ Why is it important for prosecutors to uphold high ethical
standards?
◦ Are there ripple effects on the criminal justice system
when a case like this gets high-profile media attention?
31. Defense Strategies:
The defense can simply rest
Create reasonable doubt
Present an alibi defense
Present an affirmative defense
◦ Self defense
◦ Insanity
◦ Duress
◦ Entrapment
32. Rebuttal and Surrebuttal
Closing Arguments
34. Indicate the circumstances in which a criminal defendant
may be tried a second time for the same act.
35. Double Jeopardy – The Fifth Amendment prohibits a
second prosecution in the same court for the same
criminal offense
◦ The Possibility and Risk of Retrial – a state’s prosecution
of a crime will not prevent a separate federal prosecution
of the same crime, and vice versa, if the act is also
defined as a crime under federal law; different states
may also prosecute the same person for multiple crimes
that take place in different jurisdictions