P T
 RE RIAL
PROCE DURES
AND T E
     H
CRIMINAL TRIAL
   Identify the steps involved in the pretrial criminal
    process.
   The initial appearance is the first step after arrest.

   During the appearance, the defendant is:
    ◦ Informed of the charges

    ◦ Advised of right to counsel

    ◦ Told the amount of bail

    ◦ Given a date for the preliminary hearing
Bail is the amount or conditions set by the court to
 ensure that the defendant will appear for further
 criminal proceedings.
   Bail is provided for under the Eighth Amendment.

   In most cases, the defendant will only be released if
    he/she posts bail.

   Bail is generally prohibited in capital cases.
   The Preliminary Hearing – an initial hearing in which a
    magistrate decides if there is probable cause to believe
    that the defendant committed the crime with which he/she
    is charged
    ◦ The Preliminary Hearing Process
    ◦ Waiving the Hearing

   The Grand Jury – the group of citizens called to decide
    whether probable cause exists to believe that a suspect
    committed the crime with which she/he has been charged
   Case Attrition – the process through which prosecutors,
    by deciding whether to prosecute each person arrested,
    effect an overall reduction in the number of persons
    prosecuted

    ◦ Scarce Resources
   Explain how a prosecutor screens potential cases.
   Screening Factors:
    ◦ Belief in the guilt of the suspect

    ◦ Case priorities

    ◦ Uncooperative victims

    ◦ Unreliability of victims

    ◦ Defendant who is willing to testify against other offenders
At the arraignment, defendants must file a plea:

 Guilty
 Not Guilty

 Nolo Contendre
 Motivations   for Plea Bargaining
 ◦ Prosecutors and Plea Bargaining - want a conviction

 ◦ Defense Attorneys and Plea Bargaining - want the best
   outcome for the defendant

 ◦ Defendants and Plea Bargaining - want some measure
   of control over the outcome and a lighter sentence

 ◦ Victims and Plea Bargaining – about half of the states
   permit for victim participation in plea bargaining
   Identify the basic protections enjoyed by criminal
    defendants in the United States.
Speedy Trial:
   Required by the Sixth Amendment
   Barker vs. Wingo (1972)
   All 50 states have their own speedy-trial statutes
   The Speedy Trial Act of 1974 (federal)
    ◦ No more than 30 days between arrest and indictment

    ◦ No more than 10 days between indictment and arraignment

    ◦ No more than 60 days between arraignment and trial
Role of the Jury:
   Sixth Amendment guarantees an “impartial” jury
   Duncan vs.. Louisiana (1968)
   Jury size
   Unanimity – most states require a unanimous
    verdict
   Explain what “taking the Fifth” really means.
The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination:
   Provided for in the Fifth Amendment
   Witnesses are granted immunity
   Adamson vs.. California (1947), the decision to “take the
    Fifth” should not prejudice the jury
   “Taking the Fifth” means that a witness may refuse to
    testify if such testimony may be self-incriminating
   Defendants are           The standard of proof
    presumed innocent         in criminal court is
    until proven guilty       beyond a reasonable
                              doubt
   All those chosen from the master list are
    summoned to appear. This group, from which
    the jury will be selected, is called the Venire.

   The attorneys then determine the suitability of
    each potential juror through a questioning period
    called Voir Dire.
   Contrast challenges for cause and peremptory
    challenges during voir dire.
There are two ways jurors are excluded:
   Challenges for Cause
    ◦ The attorney must provide a sound, legally justifiable
      reason why a juror cannot serve

   Peremptory Challenges
    ◦ The attorney can remove a juror without showing and
      supporting reason or cause
    ◦ Batson vs.. Kentucky (1986)
Opening Statements:
   The first step of the trial process.
   The prosecutor speaks first, followed by defense
    counsel.
   Each side attempts to construct a “road map” of
    their case for the jury to follow by outlining their
    evidence.
   Explain the difference between testimony and real
    evidence, between lay witnesses and expert
    witnesses, and between direct evidence and
    circumstantial evidence.
   Testimony is verbal        Real evidence is
    evidence given by           brought into court and
    witnesses under oath.       seen by the jury, as
                                opposed to evidence
                                that is described for a
                                jury.
   Lay witnesses are            Expert witnesses are
    those who can                 those with
    truthfully and                professional training
    accurately testify on a       or substantial
    fact in question              experience qualifying
    without having                her/him to testify on a
    specialized training or       certain subject.
    knowledge; an
    ordinary witness.
   Direct evidence is       Circumstantial
    evidence that             evidence is indirect
    establishes the           evidence that is
    existence of a fact       offered to establish,
    that is in question       by inference, the
    without relying on        likelihood of a fact
    inference.                that is in question.
The Prosecution’s Case:
   Burden of proof is on the state.
   Attempts to establish corpus delicti.
   Calls witnesses for direct examination.
    ◦ Establishes relevance and competency of witnesses.
    ◦ Avoids hearsay.
    ◦ After cross-examination, prosecutor will have one more
      opportunity during redirect examination.
   Questions:

    ◦ Why is it important for prosecutors to uphold high ethical
      standards?

    ◦ Are there ripple effects on the criminal justice system
      when a case like this gets high-profile media attention?
Defense Strategies:
   The defense can simply rest
   Create reasonable doubt
   Present an alibi defense
   Present an affirmative defense
    ◦ Self defense
    ◦ Insanity
    ◦ Duress
    ◦ Entrapment
   Rebuttal and Surrebuttal
   Closing Arguments
 Jury   Deliberation
 The    Verdict
 Appeals
   Indicate the circumstances in which a criminal defendant
    may be tried a second time for the same act.
   Double Jeopardy – The Fifth Amendment prohibits a
    second prosecution in the same court for the same
    criminal offense


    ◦ The Possibility and Risk of Retrial – a state’s prosecution
      of a crime will not prevent a separate federal prosecution
      of the same crime, and vice versa, if the act is also
      defined as a crime under federal law; different states
      may also prosecute the same person for multiple crimes
      that take place in different jurisdictions
   List the six basic steps of an appeal.
Chapter8

Chapter8

  • 1.
    P T RERIAL PROCE DURES AND T E H CRIMINAL TRIAL
  • 2.
    Identify the steps involved in the pretrial criminal process.
  • 3.
    The initial appearance is the first step after arrest.  During the appearance, the defendant is: ◦ Informed of the charges ◦ Advised of right to counsel ◦ Told the amount of bail ◦ Given a date for the preliminary hearing
  • 5.
    Bail is theamount or conditions set by the court to ensure that the defendant will appear for further criminal proceedings.  Bail is provided for under the Eighth Amendment.  In most cases, the defendant will only be released if he/she posts bail.  Bail is generally prohibited in capital cases.
  • 6.
    The Preliminary Hearing – an initial hearing in which a magistrate decides if there is probable cause to believe that the defendant committed the crime with which he/she is charged ◦ The Preliminary Hearing Process ◦ Waiving the Hearing  The Grand Jury – the group of citizens called to decide whether probable cause exists to believe that a suspect committed the crime with which she/he has been charged
  • 7.
    Case Attrition – the process through which prosecutors, by deciding whether to prosecute each person arrested, effect an overall reduction in the number of persons prosecuted ◦ Scarce Resources
  • 9.
    Explain how a prosecutor screens potential cases.
  • 10.
    Screening Factors: ◦ Belief in the guilt of the suspect ◦ Case priorities ◦ Uncooperative victims ◦ Unreliability of victims ◦ Defendant who is willing to testify against other offenders
  • 11.
    At the arraignment,defendants must file a plea:  Guilty  Not Guilty  Nolo Contendre
  • 12.
     Motivations for Plea Bargaining ◦ Prosecutors and Plea Bargaining - want a conviction ◦ Defense Attorneys and Plea Bargaining - want the best outcome for the defendant ◦ Defendants and Plea Bargaining - want some measure of control over the outcome and a lighter sentence ◦ Victims and Plea Bargaining – about half of the states permit for victim participation in plea bargaining
  • 14.
    Identify the basic protections enjoyed by criminal defendants in the United States.
  • 15.
    Speedy Trial:  Required by the Sixth Amendment  Barker vs. Wingo (1972)  All 50 states have their own speedy-trial statutes  The Speedy Trial Act of 1974 (federal) ◦ No more than 30 days between arrest and indictment ◦ No more than 10 days between indictment and arraignment ◦ No more than 60 days between arraignment and trial
  • 16.
    Role of theJury:  Sixth Amendment guarantees an “impartial” jury  Duncan vs.. Louisiana (1968)  Jury size  Unanimity – most states require a unanimous verdict
  • 17.
    Explain what “taking the Fifth” really means.
  • 18.
    The Privilege AgainstSelf-Incrimination:  Provided for in the Fifth Amendment  Witnesses are granted immunity  Adamson vs.. California (1947), the decision to “take the Fifth” should not prejudice the jury  “Taking the Fifth” means that a witness may refuse to testify if such testimony may be self-incriminating
  • 19.
    Defendants are  The standard of proof presumed innocent in criminal court is until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
  • 20.
    All those chosen from the master list are summoned to appear. This group, from which the jury will be selected, is called the Venire.  The attorneys then determine the suitability of each potential juror through a questioning period called Voir Dire.
  • 21.
    Contrast challenges for cause and peremptory challenges during voir dire.
  • 22.
    There are twoways jurors are excluded:  Challenges for Cause ◦ The attorney must provide a sound, legally justifiable reason why a juror cannot serve  Peremptory Challenges ◦ The attorney can remove a juror without showing and supporting reason or cause ◦ Batson vs.. Kentucky (1986)
  • 23.
    Opening Statements:  The first step of the trial process.  The prosecutor speaks first, followed by defense counsel.  Each side attempts to construct a “road map” of their case for the jury to follow by outlining their evidence.
  • 24.
    Explain the difference between testimony and real evidence, between lay witnesses and expert witnesses, and between direct evidence and circumstantial evidence.
  • 25.
    Testimony is verbal  Real evidence is evidence given by brought into court and witnesses under oath. seen by the jury, as opposed to evidence that is described for a jury.
  • 26.
    Lay witnesses are  Expert witnesses are those who can those with truthfully and professional training accurately testify on a or substantial fact in question experience qualifying without having her/him to testify on a specialized training or certain subject. knowledge; an ordinary witness.
  • 27.
    Direct evidence is  Circumstantial evidence that evidence is indirect establishes the evidence that is existence of a fact offered to establish, that is in question by inference, the without relying on likelihood of a fact inference. that is in question.
  • 28.
    The Prosecution’s Case:  Burden of proof is on the state.  Attempts to establish corpus delicti.  Calls witnesses for direct examination. ◦ Establishes relevance and competency of witnesses. ◦ Avoids hearsay. ◦ After cross-examination, prosecutor will have one more opportunity during redirect examination.
  • 30.
    Questions: ◦ Why is it important for prosecutors to uphold high ethical standards? ◦ Are there ripple effects on the criminal justice system when a case like this gets high-profile media attention?
  • 31.
    Defense Strategies:  The defense can simply rest  Create reasonable doubt  Present an alibi defense  Present an affirmative defense ◦ Self defense ◦ Insanity ◦ Duress ◦ Entrapment
  • 32.
    Rebuttal and Surrebuttal  Closing Arguments
  • 33.
     Jury Deliberation  The Verdict  Appeals
  • 34.
    Indicate the circumstances in which a criminal defendant may be tried a second time for the same act.
  • 35.
    Double Jeopardy – The Fifth Amendment prohibits a second prosecution in the same court for the same criminal offense ◦ The Possibility and Risk of Retrial – a state’s prosecution of a crime will not prevent a separate federal prosecution of the same crime, and vice versa, if the act is also defined as a crime under federal law; different states may also prosecute the same person for multiple crimes that take place in different jurisdictions
  • 36.
    List the six basic steps of an appeal.