Unified Communications at
McInnes Cooper
Objectives

• Remove barriers to communication among the
  firm’s seven offices
• Deliver technology that can enhance client
  service and provide a competitive advantage
Scope

• Implement Microsoft OCS 2007 R2 firm-wide
• Integrate or replace legacy telephone systems
  – 1 hybrid IP/TDM PBX
  – 1 pure IP PBX
  – 1 Norstar key system
  – 4 Centrex offices
• Train ~200 lawyers and ~300 staff in seven
  locations
Deliverables

• Presence             • Unified messaging
• Instant Messaging    • Desktop-integrated
• Audio conferencing     telephony

• Web conferencing     • New telephone
                         hardware
• Desktop video
  conferencing         • Training

• Desktop sharing
Budget

• Capital: ~$325K
  – Software was largely included in our EA
• Operating: ~$125K annual savings
• Payback of less than 3 years in hard costs
  alone
• An example: combination of presence, desktop
  sharing and conferencing on one call resulted in
  real additional revenue of $17,500.
Timeline

• May 2009 Business case presented to
  CEO/COO
• Jun 2009 First “promotional tour”/started
  gathering requirements:
• Dec 2009 Phase 1 rollout (all but voice)
• Apr 2010 Second “promotional tour
• May 2010 Phase 2 rollout (enterprise voice)
People

•   Initiated by MC’s Communication Services Leader
•   Management backing (IT Director, COO, CEO)
•   The entire firm had the opportunity to see the
    concept and participate in its development
•   Two pilot groups of 50 users each
•   Contracted training (in cooperation with MC staff)
•   Admin staff outside IT were heavily involved in
    training rollout and immediate post-launch support
Process

• Conceptualized by Communication Services
  Leader, who basically sold it to the IT Director
• IT Director and Communication Services
  Leader jointly sold it to the COO/CEO
• Did a conceptual design
• Did a face-to-face “tour” of all offices to present
  the concept and get feedback
• Began the detailed design, with some
  consulting assistance
Process

• Built the infrastructure, and tested with IT
• Ran a pilot group of 50, then doubled it
• Did another face-to-face “tour” of all offices to
  demonstrate the production solution and set
  expectation for implementation
• Issued phone sets in parallel to allow people to
  become familiar with the technology before the
  actual telephone cutover
Process

• Provided classroom training to the entire firm
  (90 min) in close proximity to live cutover
• Live cutover included removing the existing
  phone system – no overlap.
• Provided deskside support for the first couple of
  days to quickly deal with any minor issues
• Followup communications as each office went
  live, and following completion in all offices
Results

• A fully desktop-integrated, zero-PBX, voice, text
  and video communications solution delivered to
  the entire firm.
• Examples of additional revenue as a direct
  result of the capabilities delivered. In the first
  week!
• Lawyers excited about technology!
ILTA 2010 Project of the Year

ILTA 2010 Project of the Year

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Objectives • Remove barriersto communication among the firm’s seven offices • Deliver technology that can enhance client service and provide a competitive advantage
  • 3.
    Scope • Implement MicrosoftOCS 2007 R2 firm-wide • Integrate or replace legacy telephone systems – 1 hybrid IP/TDM PBX – 1 pure IP PBX – 1 Norstar key system – 4 Centrex offices • Train ~200 lawyers and ~300 staff in seven locations
  • 4.
    Deliverables • Presence • Unified messaging • Instant Messaging • Desktop-integrated • Audio conferencing telephony • Web conferencing • New telephone hardware • Desktop video conferencing • Training • Desktop sharing
  • 5.
    Budget • Capital: ~$325K – Software was largely included in our EA • Operating: ~$125K annual savings • Payback of less than 3 years in hard costs alone • An example: combination of presence, desktop sharing and conferencing on one call resulted in real additional revenue of $17,500.
  • 6.
    Timeline • May 2009Business case presented to CEO/COO • Jun 2009 First “promotional tour”/started gathering requirements: • Dec 2009 Phase 1 rollout (all but voice) • Apr 2010 Second “promotional tour • May 2010 Phase 2 rollout (enterprise voice)
  • 7.
    People • Initiated by MC’s Communication Services Leader • Management backing (IT Director, COO, CEO) • The entire firm had the opportunity to see the concept and participate in its development • Two pilot groups of 50 users each • Contracted training (in cooperation with MC staff) • Admin staff outside IT were heavily involved in training rollout and immediate post-launch support
  • 8.
    Process • Conceptualized byCommunication Services Leader, who basically sold it to the IT Director • IT Director and Communication Services Leader jointly sold it to the COO/CEO • Did a conceptual design • Did a face-to-face “tour” of all offices to present the concept and get feedback • Began the detailed design, with some consulting assistance
  • 9.
    Process • Built theinfrastructure, and tested with IT • Ran a pilot group of 50, then doubled it • Did another face-to-face “tour” of all offices to demonstrate the production solution and set expectation for implementation • Issued phone sets in parallel to allow people to become familiar with the technology before the actual telephone cutover
  • 10.
    Process • Provided classroomtraining to the entire firm (90 min) in close proximity to live cutover • Live cutover included removing the existing phone system – no overlap. • Provided deskside support for the first couple of days to quickly deal with any minor issues • Followup communications as each office went live, and following completion in all offices
  • 11.
    Results • A fullydesktop-integrated, zero-PBX, voice, text and video communications solution delivered to the entire firm. • Examples of additional revenue as a direct result of the capabilities delivered. In the first week! • Lawyers excited about technology!