This document discusses real name policies for e-participation platforms using Germany's city of Gütersloh's participatory budgeting project as a case study. Gütersloh initially required real names for its first two participatory budgets to limit participation to citizens, facilitate high-quality dialogue, and ensure transparent communication. However, objections were raised that real names could distract from issue-based discussions, violate privacy, and be difficult to implement. Analysis found the negative consequences of real names likely outweighed the benefits, and that moderation and pseudonyms could address problems with anonymity. Gütersloh then decided its third participatory budget would not require real names.