Crescent Pure
A Harvard Case Study
About Crescent
•Crescent is a non-alcoholic functional beverage
•Founded by Peter Hooper in 2008
•Portland Drake Beverages, largest nation
beverage company acquired Crescent in July
2013
•Known for refreshing energizing and enhancing
mental focus
The product
Boasts of being an organic, all-natural,
energy enhancing and hydrating beverage
lightly infused with organic juices, herbal
stimulants and electrolytes
Ingredients
•Herbal stimulants : guarana seed and
ginseng
•Raw organic cane sugar
•Green tea
•80 Calorie serving
•All ingredients are “certified organic”
Problem
Vice President of marketing in PDB Sarah Ryan has
to decide on the positioning strategy of PDB’s newly
acquired beverage company Crescent Pure, which
has energizing, hydrating and organic ingredients,
making it a difficult task to position it. She has a
budget of $750,000.
Energy Drink
Pros Cons
• Fast growing market
• Demand for healthy organic
substitutes and lower levels of
sugar, caffeine and calorie
• Price of the can is affordable and
cheaper than others
• Energy drinks are portrayed as a
unhealthy drink by media
• Consumption is on a low due to
health issues
• Less energy per can than the
competitors
Sports Drink
Pros Cons
• Wide range of consumers
• Opportunities to grow
• Attracts all health conscious
people
• Gives hydration, energy boost
and mental focus
• Slow growth in market
• Tough competitor's
• Cost is higher than the
competitor's
• Plans to ban ending machines in
school
Organic Drink
Pros Cons
• There is a demand
• Avoiding the traditional branding
• Delay in the product launch
• Higher advertisement cost
• Idea may or may not resonate
with people
Break Even Analysis
Advertising Budget (TFC) = $750,000
Variable cost per can (V) = $1.02
Sales price per can (P) = $1.24
Break Even cans (TFC/(P-V)) ~ 34,09,091
Break Even cases (TFC/(P-V)) ~ 1,42,045
Max capacity of cans = 34,56,000
Over capacity of cans= 46,909
Over capacity of cases ~ 1,954
Functional ,
natural and
refreshing are the
adjectives that
best describe this
product according
to the
respondents.
Therefore the type
of marketing
should consider
these while
choosing
Respondents best
described “sports
drinks” to be more
refreshing,
functional and
hydrating whiles
are in line with the
product and in the
previous slide
table 3 In which
people described
what people think
62% of online
consumers have a
college degree. So
banning Crescent in
schools is a
drawback for sport
drinks category since
they are marketed to
young generation
between 12-24
My Suggestion
Market Crescent as organic energy drink
Why?
•Focuses on health
•Provides healthier alternative to the
existing energy drinks
•Attract more consumers
•The product price can be increased
• This aligns well with the demographic of
Crescent
Disclaimer
Created by Aaishwarya Avhad, UMIT , during a marketing
internship by Prof. Sameer Mathur , IIM Lucknow.
(See mbaskillsin@gmail.com)

Case study - Crescent pure

  • 1.
  • 2.
    About Crescent •Crescent isa non-alcoholic functional beverage •Founded by Peter Hooper in 2008 •Portland Drake Beverages, largest nation beverage company acquired Crescent in July 2013 •Known for refreshing energizing and enhancing mental focus
  • 3.
    The product Boasts ofbeing an organic, all-natural, energy enhancing and hydrating beverage lightly infused with organic juices, herbal stimulants and electrolytes
  • 4.
    Ingredients •Herbal stimulants :guarana seed and ginseng •Raw organic cane sugar •Green tea •80 Calorie serving •All ingredients are “certified organic”
  • 5.
    Problem Vice President ofmarketing in PDB Sarah Ryan has to decide on the positioning strategy of PDB’s newly acquired beverage company Crescent Pure, which has energizing, hydrating and organic ingredients, making it a difficult task to position it. She has a budget of $750,000.
  • 7.
    Energy Drink Pros Cons •Fast growing market • Demand for healthy organic substitutes and lower levels of sugar, caffeine and calorie • Price of the can is affordable and cheaper than others • Energy drinks are portrayed as a unhealthy drink by media • Consumption is on a low due to health issues • Less energy per can than the competitors
  • 8.
    Sports Drink Pros Cons •Wide range of consumers • Opportunities to grow • Attracts all health conscious people • Gives hydration, energy boost and mental focus • Slow growth in market • Tough competitor's • Cost is higher than the competitor's • Plans to ban ending machines in school
  • 9.
    Organic Drink Pros Cons •There is a demand • Avoiding the traditional branding • Delay in the product launch • Higher advertisement cost • Idea may or may not resonate with people
  • 10.
    Break Even Analysis AdvertisingBudget (TFC) = $750,000 Variable cost per can (V) = $1.02 Sales price per can (P) = $1.24 Break Even cans (TFC/(P-V)) ~ 34,09,091 Break Even cases (TFC/(P-V)) ~ 1,42,045 Max capacity of cans = 34,56,000 Over capacity of cans= 46,909 Over capacity of cases ~ 1,954
  • 11.
    Functional , natural and refreshingare the adjectives that best describe this product according to the respondents. Therefore the type of marketing should consider these while choosing
  • 12.
    Respondents best described “sports drinks”to be more refreshing, functional and hydrating whiles are in line with the product and in the previous slide table 3 In which people described what people think
  • 13.
    62% of online consumershave a college degree. So banning Crescent in schools is a drawback for sport drinks category since they are marketed to young generation between 12-24
  • 14.
    My Suggestion Market Crescentas organic energy drink
  • 15.
    Why? •Focuses on health •Provideshealthier alternative to the existing energy drinks •Attract more consumers •The product price can be increased • This aligns well with the demographic of Crescent
  • 16.
    Disclaimer Created by AaishwaryaAvhad, UMIT , during a marketing internship by Prof. Sameer Mathur , IIM Lucknow. (See mbaskillsin@gmail.com)