a Term Paper on How to Reduce Our Carbon Footprints on Earth.

1. © Pascal Chisom Okechukwu
1 | P a g e
THE ROLE OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS IN REDUCING THE CARBON
FOOTPRINT
BY
PASCAL CHISOM OKECHUKWU
REG. NO: 2011214087
SEMESTER PAPER SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE
REQUIREMENT FOR ChE 591; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
ENGINEERING AND CONTROL
TO
DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
NNAMDI AZIKIWE UNIVERSITY, AWKA, NIGERIA
LECTURER-IN-CHARGE: PROF. P K IGBOKWE
JANUARY, 2016

2. © Pascal Chisom Okechukwu
2 | P a g e
ABSTRACT
This work presents the issue of the Carbon Footprint and the causes; dangers of
Climate Change beside it. It went further to explain how complex the carbon
footprint is, in terms of calculating it both individually and on a larger scale.
More importantly, it focused on the efforts greatly contributed by Chemical
Engineers in curbing the Global Warming phenomenon and reducing the carbon
footprint, through technologies like the carbon offsetting alternatives, catalytic
converters, coal gasification, and CCS.

3. © Pascal Chisom Okechukwu
3 | P a g e
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Environment consists of all the external factors (living or non-living)
affecting an organism. And every minute change in any one factor in an
ecosystem can influence whether or not a particular plant or animal species will
be successful in its environment.
1.1 Global Warming and Our Future.
Within the last century, the amount of carbon di oxide in the atmosphere has
increased dramatically, largely because people burn vast amounts of fossil fuels-
coal and petroleum and its derivatives. Average global temperature also has
increased- by about 0.6 Celsius degree (1 Fahrenheit degree) within the past
century. Atmospheric scientists have found that at least half of that temperature
increase can be attributed to human activity. They predict that unless dramatic
action is taken, global temperature will continue to rise by 1.4 to 5.8 Celsius
degrees (2.5 to 10.4 Fahrenheit degrees) over the next century.
Shrinking Greenland Ice Sheet

4. © Pascal Chisom Okechukwu
4 | P a g e
The consequences of such a modest increase in temperature may be
devastating. Already scientists have detected a 40 percent reduction in the
average thickness of Arctic ice. Other problems that may develop include a rise
in sea levels that will completely inundate a number of low-lying island nations
and flood many coastal cities, such as New York and Miami. Many plant and
animal species will probably be driven into extinction, agriculture will be
severely disrupted in many regions, and the frequency of severe hurricanes and
droughts will likely increase.
Following these findings and future predictions, there arose the need to
drastically reduce our carbon footprint.
1.2 The CARBON Menace
It is very much possible that Carbon related compounds (including the Oxides
and Methane) accounts for approximately 50 percent alone of the contributions
to global warming. The predominant form of carbon in the air is Carbon dioxide
(CO₂). It is usually considered nontoxic and innocuous, but increasing
atmospheric levels (about 0.5 percent per year) due to human activities appear
to be causing a global climate warning that may have disastrous effects on both
human and natural communities.
Anthropogenic (human-caused) CO₂ releases are difficult to quantify because
they spread across global scales. The best current estimate from the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is that between 7 and 8
billion tons of carbon (in the form of CO₂) are released each year by fossil fuel
combustion and that another 1 to 2 billion tons are released by forest and grass
fires, cement manufacturing, and other human activities. Typically, terrestrial

5. © Pascal Chisom Okechukwu
5 | P a g e
ecosystems take up about 3 billion tons. This leaves an average of at least 3
billion tons to accumulate in the atmosphere.
Carbon Monoxide (CO) is a colourless, odourless, non-irritating but highly toxic
gas produced by incomplete combustion of fuel (coal, oil, charcoal, or gas),
incineration of biomass or solid waste, or partially anaerobic decomposition of
material. CO inhibits respiration in animals by binding irreversibly to
haemoglobin. About 1 billion metric tons of CO are released to the atmosphere
each year, half of that from human activities. In the United States, two-thirds of
the CO emissions are created by internal combustion engines in transportation.
Land-clearing fires and cooking fires also are major sources. About 90 percent of
the CO in the air is consumed in photochemical reactions that produce Ozone.

6. © Pascal Chisom Okechukwu
6 | P a g e
2.0 The CARBON FOOTPRINT
According to timeforchange, a carbon footprint is defined as the total amount
of greenhouse gases produced to directly and indirectly support human
activities, usually expressed in equivalent tons of carbon dioxide (CO₂).
Calculating or checking for one’s carbon footprint is usually a cumbersome task.
Say: when you drive a car, the engine burns fuel which creates a certain amount
of CO₂, depending on its fuel consumption and the driving distance. When you
heat your house with oil, gas or coal, then you also generate CO₂. Even if you
heat your house with electricity, the generation of the electrical power may also
have emitted a certain amount of CO₂. When you buy food and goods, the
production of the food and goods also emitted some quantities of CO₂. So it
becomes quite inescapable for every individual on Earth, when it comes to
contributing to Global Warming.
Your carbon footprint is the sum of all emissions of CO₂, which were induced by
your activities in a given time frame. Usually it is calculated for the time period
of a year. And the best way is to calculate the carbon dioxide based on the fuel
consumption.
The carbon footprint is a very powerful tool to understand the impact of
personal behaviour on global warming. Most people are shocked when they see
the amount of CO2 their activities create! If you personally want to contribute
to stop global warming, the calculation and constant monitoring of your
personal carbon footprint is essential.
The table below shows the CO₂ emission for the most common fuels in the USA
and UK.

7. © Pascal Chisom Okechukwu
7 | P a g e
Fuel Type Unit CO₂ Emitted Per Unit
Petrol 1 gallon (UK) 10.4 kg
Petrol 1 litre 2.3 kg
Gasoline 1 gallon (USA) 8.7 kg
Gasoline 1 litre 2.3 kg
Diesel 1 gallon (UK) 12.2 kg
Diesel 1 gallon (USA) 9.95 kg
Diesel 1 litre 2.7 kg
Oil (heating) 1 gallon (UK) 13.6 kg
Oil (heating) 1 gallon (USA) 11.26 kg
Oil (heating) 1 litre 3 kg
Table. Showing the CO₂ emission for common fuels in the USA and UK
For example, if your car consumes 7.5 litres diesel per 100 km, then a drive of
300 km distance consumes 3 x 7.5 = 22.5 litres diesel, which adds 22.5 x 2.7 kg =
60.75 kg CO₂ to your personal carbon footprint.
Now, each of the following activities add 1 kg of CO₂ to your personal carbon
footprint:
 Travel by public transportation (train or bus) a distance of 10 to 12 km (6.5
to 7 miles)
 Drive with your car a distance of 6 km or 3.75 miles (assuming 7.3 litres
petrol per 100 km or 39 mpg)
 Fly with a plane a distance of 2.2 km or 1.375 miles.
 Operate your computer for 32 hours (60 Watt consumption assumed)
 Production of 5 plastic bags
 Production of 2 plastic bottles
To calculate the above contributions to the carbon footprint, the current UK mix
for electricity and trains was taken into account.

8. © Pascal Chisom Okechukwu
8 | P a g e
3.0 The CARBON FOOTPRINT REDUCTION
Having known the consequences of releasing much CO₂ into the atmosphere, by
our everyday living, it has ever being an utmost concern for all parties involved
in the contribution to this ever-increasing carbon footprint; to find all possible
means of keeping it at and beyond bay. The most common way to administer
the solution is to Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, and Refuse. In manufacturing, this can
be done by recycling the packing materials, by selling obsolete inventories of
one industry to another looking to buy the unused items at a lesser price.
Also, reusable items such as thermoses, should be used for daily coffee or plastic
containers for consumables, rather than disposable ones. Disposable items,
when used however, should be properly recycled. It is estimated that some 1.2
tons of CO₂ is saved annually, when one household recycles at least half of their
household waste. Other means of reducing our carbon footprint involves driving
less, walking more or biking, using less air conditioning and heating in the house,
etc. These would all ensure burning less fuel and releasing fewer emissions into
the atmosphere.
On the larger scale, the huge leap in reducing carbon footprints is participated
in; and carried out by major industries and organizations. This is where Chemical
Engineering comes in to take the lead.

9. © Pascal Chisom Okechukwu
9 | P a g e
4.0 The Role of CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
Chemical engineers play a leading role in the design and implementation of
effective technology-based solutions to control CO₂ emissions. Current projects
include
 Advanced combustion systems that reduce the formation of CO2 and
other combustion-related Green House Gases;
 Pollution-control systems engineered to capture CO2 emissions; and
 Use of cleaner-burning alternative energy sources, such as biomass-
derived fuels and solar- and wind-generated power. Known as the Carbon
Offsetting Alternatives.
Already existing techniques involve the use of Catalytic Converters in
automobiles and other fossil fuel-driven engines; and Coal gasification. While
other efforts involve the development of mechanisms for sequestering CO2
emissions underground to prevent their accumulation in the atmosphere.
Sequestration, not yet practised on a commercial scale, involves the injection of
compressed CO2 into stable, subsurface geological reservoirs. This is known as
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS).
For the confinement of this work, these designs and implementations would be
treated in little details.
4.1 CATALYTIC CONVERTERS
Chemical engineers, working with scientists and other engineers, have helped
devise ways to cost effectively reduce the amount of pollution produced by
petroleum-derived, fuel-burning engines.

10. © Pascal Chisom Okechukwu
10 | P a g e
A catalytic converter is an emissions control device that converts toxic pollutants
in exhaust gas to less toxic pollutants by catalysing a redox reaction (oxidation
or reduction). Catalytic converters are used with internal combustion engines
fuelled by either petrol (gasoline) or diesel- including lean-burn engines as well
as kerosene heaters and stoves. The catalytic converter is considered one of the
most important contributions to the field of air-pollution control. It is now a
standard feature on vehicles everywhere. It destroys the three main pollutants
found in engine exhaust- namely: carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide, and
unburnt hydrocarbons.
The converter consists of a porous honeycomb ceramic base material coated
with a precious metal catalyst. The honeycomb structure provides high catalyst
surface area, which minimizes the contact between the catalysts and the
pollutants in the exhaust gases.
Figure. Basic structure of the catalytic converter for automobile engines.

11. © Pascal Chisom Okechukwu
11 | P a g e
When this novel structure was first invented, it featured two distinct chemical
engineering advantages:
 It maximized the amount of catalyst-coated surface area to which the
engine exhaust may be exposed.
 It minimized the amount of expensive precious-metal catalyst required.
To recognize how important catalytic converters are in environmental
protection, President George W. Bush awarded the its inventors, the chemical
engineer John Mooney and the chemist Carl Zeith, with the 2002 National
Medal of Technology, the highest honour given for innovation in the United
States.
4.2 COAL GASIFICATION
Coal remains the cheapest and most plentiful of all the fossil fuels. However, it
is also the most polluting. Chemical engineers have worked to perfect coal
gasification, a method to generate electricity and produce fuels from coal with
significantly less environmental impact. Now utilities can burn clean synthetic
gas made from coal and have considerably fewer emissions than with traditional
pulverized coal combustion.
Coal gasification electric power plants are now operating commercially in the
United States and in other nations, and many experts predict that coal
gasification will be at the heart of future generations of clean coal technology
plants. Rather than burning coal directly, gasification (a thermo-chemical
process) breaks down coal or virtually any carbon-based feedstock- into its basic
chemical constituents. In a modern gasifier, coal is typically exposed to steam
and carefully controlled amounts of air or oxygen under high temperatures and

12. © Pascal Chisom Okechukwu
12 | P a g e
pressures. Under these conditions, molecules in coal break apart, initiating
chemical reactions that typically produce a mixture of carbon monoxide,
hydrogen and other gaseous compounds.
Coal gasification may offer a further environmental advantage in addressing
concerns over the atmospheric build-up of greenhouse gases, such as carbon
dioxide. If oxygen is used in a coal gasifier instead of air, carbon dioxide is
emitted as a concentrated gas stream in syngas at high pressure. In this form, it
can be captured and sequestered more easily and at lower costs. By contrast,
when coal burns or is reacted in air, 79 percent of which is nitrogen, the resulting
carbon dioxide is diluted and more costly to separate.
4.3 CARBON OFFSETTING ALTERNATIVES
Asides the Solar and Wind Energy alternatives that are in efficient use in most
technologically leading nations of the world, the option of Biomass Energy has
become a huge trend. Chemical engineers are helping reduce harmful emissions
through the development of technologies used to convert biomass into fuel.
Biomass is fuel that is developed from organic materials, a renewable and
sustainable source of energy used to create electricity or other forms of power.
Bioenergy is the most widely used renewable energy worldwide and can be
defined as “energy contained in living or recently living biological organisms”. It
can be differentiated into three distinct types.
Biofuels. Such as ethanol and biodiesel are fuels made from crop such as corn
and oil palms respectively.
Biogas. Is produced with waste products such as sewage and dung.

13. © Pascal Chisom Okechukwu
13 | P a g e
Solid Biomass. Suh as wood has been used since ancient times for cooking and
heating purposes- and more recently to generate electricity.
Burning biomass to create clean electricity releases no new carbons back into
the atmosphere. Instead, it releases what would be released naturally as the
organic matter decomposed. It forms a closed cycle too, because the carbon that
is released when biomass is burned is re-absorbed by other plants in their
growing cycle.
The use of biomass will reduce the nation’s greenhouse gas emissions, thus
helping mitigate climate change (carbon footprint). Biodiesels and biogas are
now being speedily improved and are already replacing fossil fuels in most
countries.
4.4 CARBON CAPTURE and STORAGE (CCS)
Carbon capture and storage or sequestration prevents large amounts of carbon
dioxide from being released into the atmosphere. The technology involves
capturing CO2 produced by large industrial plants, compressing it for
transportation and then injecting it deep into a rock formation at a carefully
selected and safe site, where it is permanently stored.
Because CCS can achieve significant CO2 emission reductions, it is considered a
key option within the portfolio of approaches required to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions. The technology involves three major steps:
Capture. The separation of CO2 from other gases produced at large industrial
process facilities such as coal and natural gas power plants, steel mills and
cement plants. See the Figure below.

14. © Pascal Chisom Okechukwu
14 | P a g e
Transport. Once separated, the CO2 is compressed and transported, usually via
pipelines, to a suitable site for geological storage.
Storage. CO2 is injected into deep underground rock formations, often at depths
of one kilometre or more.
The need for CCS stems from the fact that we need a very significant scale of
CO2 mitigation. CCS can contribute around 14% of total energy-related CO2
reductions by 2050, compared to a `do nothing’ approach (2014, IEA, Energy
Technology Perspectives).
Around 40% of CO2 emissions come from the power sector. Another 25% come
from large-scale industrial processes such as iron and steel production, cement
making, chemicals and refining. Demand for fossil fuels is likely to remain strong,
especially in developing countries, where a significant percentage of the
population currently has no access to electricity.
CCS is a viable option- in some cases, the only viable option- for significantly
reducing emissions from such large-scale emission sources.

15. © Pascal Chisom Okechukwu
15 | P a g e
5.0 CONCLUSION
Reducing the carbon footprint on planet Earth has proven to be a realistic and
already working process. With chemical engineers taking the lead in designing
and developing astounding technological projects to not only ensure the end to
a net increase of CO2 emissions, but also to capture some of the already emitted
CO2 in the atmosphere and convert them into future useful energy once more.
The development of biomass energy technology and other carbon offsetting
alternatives has further ensured that future generations would have less to
worry about on the issue of carbon footprint and global warming. Major
companies like Shell are seriously improving on the development of the CCS
technology and other projects such as improving the production of Liquefied
Natural Gas (LNG), which has a very much lesser impact on the environment
compared to other fossil fuels.

16. © Pascal Chisom Okechukwu
16 | P a g e
REFERENCES
Zimmerman, Michael. “Environment”. Microsoft ® Encarta ® 2009 [DVD].
Redmond, WA: Microsoft Corporation, 2008.
William P. Cunningham, Mary Ann Cunningham, Barbara Woodworth Saigo.
Environmental Science: A Global Concern. 8th Edition. The McGraw-Hill
Companies, Inc. 2005.
timeforchange.org/what-is-a-carbon-footprint-definition
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/carbon_footprint
Chemical Engineers in Action: www.chemicalengineering.org/enviro/
How Stuff Works: auto.howstuffworks.com/catalytic-converter.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/catalytic_converter
energy.gov/fe/science-innovation/clean-coal-research/gasification
https://energypedia.info/wiki/Portal:Bioenergy
www.reenergyholdings.com/renewable-energy/biomass-faqs/
https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/content/what-ccs