Team C-1 presented information on slides that was succinct and supported their argument, though not always backed by direct evidence or resources. The Diigo page was unorganized and missing links. While facts stated aligned with their argument, supporting evidence was not shown on slides. Team B's slides had paragraphs that were too long to read and the resources on one slide did not match their Diigo page. Their video supported the argument but focused more on texting than digital technology and their presentation only stated opinions without facts.

1. Team C-1
Julian Lee
llock, Chris Godfrey,
Sean Daniels, Jason Bu
De

2. -1 Steak Sauce
Team A

3. Slides
In each of these slides the information given was not supported by direct evidence, but was still
written succinctly and served to support the general argument.
The first resource link on slide #2 led to an opinion based blog post that did not use any
references.
There were no resources shown on slide #4.
Resource links were given on all other slides. Each was researched and found to be legitimate.
All images used were provided a URL link.

4. Video Slide
The video shown was
interesting and
utilized emotion to
strongly reinforce
the group’s
argument.

5. Diigo
The Diigo page was unorganized and difficult
to navigate through. Several links were
missing and only one article was highlighted.

6. Presentation
Overall
Though supporting evidence was not shown on any of the slides, most facts stated in the
presentation were given specific examples and statistics.
The group seemed to know what to say without frequently referring to the document.
Facts clearly related to and supported the groups argument.
The information on the slides are brief and were able to be read through quickly without
distracting from the speaker.

7. Team B. Ready

8. Slides
The second and fourth slide had a paragraph of information that took too long to read,
distracting from the speaker.
The resources listed on slide #2 were not listed on the group’s Diigo page.
All resources that were provided on the other slides were well-founded.
Slide #5 referenced a scientific study to support their argument. All other slides provided only
opinions.

9. Video Slide
The video seemed to be aimed more
towards texting specifically rather than
digital technology as a whole. Nonetheless,
it presented a real-world example that
helped to support the group’s argument.

10. Diigo
Each Diigo link directed my group to the
correct resource page with little difficulty.

11. Presentation
Overall
The team’s members spoke without reading directly from their document.
During the presentation, no facts were stated; only opinions.
The group’s presentation was titled “How Texting Has Not Increased Literacy Skills,” however,
the topic assigned to them was digital technology as a whole, not just texting.
All of the group’s information circulated around written forms of communication and little else,
leading our group to believe that they did their research on the wrong subject.

12. The Winner