SlideShare a Scribd company logo
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
E-ISSN: 2321 – 4767 P-ISSN: 2321 - 4759
www.ijmsi.org Volume 2 Issue 7 || July. 2014 || PP-11-18
www.ijmsi.org 11 | P a g e
On πgr - Homeomorphisms in Topological Spaces.
1,
Janaki.C , 2,
Jeyanthi.V
1.
Asst. Professor/Mathematics, L.R.G. Govt.Arts College for Women, Tirupur- 4.
2.
Asst.Professor/Mathematics, Sree Narayana Guru College , Coimbatore – 105.
E-mail: 1.janakicsekar@yahoo.com 2.jeyanthi_sngc@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT:The purpose of this paper is to introduce and study the concept of πgr -closed maps , πgr -
homeomorphism ,πgrc - homeomorphism and obtain some of their characterizations.
KEYWORDS: πgr-closed map, πgr-open map,πgr-homeomorphism and πgrc- homeomorphism.
Mathematics subject classification: 54A05, 54D10.
I. INTRODUCTION
Levine [9]introduced the concept of generalized closed sets in topological spaces and a class of
topological space called T1/2-space. The concept of -closed sets in topological spaces was initiated by
Zaitsav[18] and the concept of g-closed set was introduced by Noiri and Dontchev[4]. N.Palaniappan[16]
studied and introduced regular closed sets in topological spaces. Generalized closed mappings, wg-closed maps
,regular closed maps and rg-closed maps were introduced and studied by Malghan[13],Nagaveni[14],Long[11]
and Arokiarani[1] respectively.Maki et al [12] who introduced generalized homeomorphism and gC-
homeomorphism which are nothing but the generalizations of homeomorphism in topological spaces. Devi et al
[3]defined and studied generalized semi-homeomorphism and gsc homeomorphism in topological spaces. In
2013,Jeyanthi.V and Janaki.C [6] introduced and studied the properties of πgr-closed sets in topological spaces.
Here we introduce and study the concepts of πgr- homeomorphisms ,πgrc -homeomorphism and their relations.
II. PRELIMINARIES
Throughout this paper, X , Y and Z denote the topological spaces (X,τ),(Y,σ) and (Z,η) respectively, on
which no separation axioms are assumed. Let us recall the following definitions.
Definition:2.1
A subset A of a topological space X is said to be
[1] a semi -open [10] if A cl (int(A)) and semi-closed if int (cl(A)) A
[2] a regular open[16] if A = int (cl(A)) and regular closed if A = cl(int(A))
[3] π- open [18] if A is the finite union of regular open sets and the complement of π- open set is π- closed set
in X.
The family of all open sets [ regular open, π-open, semi open] sets of X will be denoted by O(X)(resp. RO(X),
πO(X), SO(X)]
Definition:2.2
A map f: X→Y is said to be
[1] continuous [10]if f-1
(V) is closed in X for every closed set V in Y.
[2] Regular continuous ( r-continuous) [16]if f-1
(V) is regular-closed in X for every closed set
[3] V in Y.
[4] An R-map[2] if f-1
(V) is regular closed in X for every regular closed set V of Y.
[5] πgr-continuous[7,8] if f-1
(V) is πgr-closed in X for every closed set V in Y.
[6] πgr-irresolute[7,8] if f-1
(V) is πgr-closed in X for every πgr -closed set V in Y.
Definition :2.3
A space X is called a πgr-T1/2 space [7,8]if every πgr-closed set is regular closed.
Definition:2.4
A map f: XY is called
1.closed [13 ]if f(U) is closed in Y for every closed set U of X.
On Πgr - Homeomorphisms In…
www.ijmsi.org 12 | P a g e
2.almost closed[ 17] if f(U) is closed in Y for every regular closed set U of X.
3.regular closed [11]if f(U) is regular closed in Y for every closed set U of X
4.rc-preserving [15]if f(U) is regular closed in Y for every regular closed set U of X.
Definition:2.5[6]
Let f : (X,τ)→(Y,σ) be a map. A map f is said to be
[1] πgr -open if f(U) in πgr-open in Y for every open set U of X.
[2] strongly gr-open map (M-gr-open)if f(V) is gr-open in Y for every gr-open set V in X.
[3] quasi gr-open if f(V) is open in Y for every gr-open set V in X.
[4] almost gr-open map if f(V) is gr-open in Y for every regular open set V in X.
Definition:2.6
A bijection f:X→ Y is called a homeomorphism [12]if f is both continuous and open.((i.e), f & f-1
are
continuous)
III. πGR - HOMEOMORPHISMS
Definition:3.1
A bijection f:X→ Y is called
[1] πgr - homeomorphism if f is both πgr- continuous and πgr - open.((i.e), f & f-1
are πgr -continuous)
[2] πgrc - homeomorphism if f and f-1
are πgr- irresolute.
Proposition :3.2
If a mapping f : X → Y is πgr -closed, then for every subset A of X, πgr- cl f(A)  f(cl(A))
Proof:
Suppose f is πgr -closed and let A  X .Then f(cl(A)) is πgr - closed in (Y, ). We have f(A)  f(cl(A)). Then
πgr -cl(f(A))  πgr -cl [f(cl(A))] = f(cl(A))
πgr -cl (f(A))  f(cl(A))
Theorem :3.3
Let f : X → Y and g : Y → Z be two mappings such that their composition g f : X → Y be a πgr - closed
map.Then
[1] f is continuous and surjective, then g is πgr- closed.
[2] g is πgr- irresolute and injective, then f is πgr - closed.
[3] f is πgr- continuous, surjective and X is a πgr-T1/2- space, then g is πgr - closed.
Proof :
(i)Let V be a closed set of Y. Since f is Continuous, f-1
(V) is closed in X. Since (g f) is πgr -closed in Z, (g  f)
(f-1
(V)) is πgr- closed in Z.
g(f(f-1
(V)) = g(V) is πgr - closed in Z.(Since f is surjective)
ie, for the closed set V of Y, g(V) is πgr- closed in Z.
g is a πgr - closed map.
(ii)Let V be a closed set of X .Since (g f) is πgr - closed ,(g f) (V) is πgr- closed in Z. Since g is πgr -
irresolute,g-1
[(g f)(V)] is πgr - closed in Y.
g-1
[g(f(V))] is πgr closed in Y
f(V) is πgr - closed in Y. Hence f is a πgr - closed map.
(iii)Let V be a closed set of Y
Since f is πgr - continuous, f-1
(V) is πgr - closed in X for every closed set V of Y.Since X is πgr -T1/2- space,
f-1
(V) is regular closed in X and hence closed in X. Now, as in (i), g is a πgr- closed map.
(iv)Let V be a closed set of Y
Since f is πgr - continuous, f-1
(V) is πgr- closed in X.
Since X is πgr -T1/2- space, f-1
(V) is regular closed in X and hence closed in X.
Now, the proof as in (i), g is a πgr- closed map.
On Πgr - Homeomorphisms In…
www.ijmsi.org 13 | P a g e
Proposition :3.4
Let f : X → Y and g : Y → Z be πgr - closed maps and Y is a πgr-T1/2- space, then their composition g  f :
X→ Z is a πgr - closed map.
Proof :
Let f : X → Y be a closed map. Then for the closed set V of X, f(V) is πgr - closed in Y. Since Y is a πgr -T1/2
space, f(V) is regular closed in Y and hence closed in Y.Again, since g is a πgr - closed map, g(f(V)) is πgr -
closed in Z for the closed set f(V) of Y .
(gf) (V) is πgr - closed in Z for the closed set V of X .
(gf) is a πgr -closed map.
Proposition :3.5
Let f : (X, τ) → (Y, ) be a closed map and g : (Y, ) → (Z,η ) be a πgr - closed map, then their composition
g f : (X, τ) →(Z,η ) is πgr - continuous.
Proof :Let V be a closed set of X. Since f is a closed map, f (V) is closed in Y.
Again, since g is a πgr - closed map, g(f(V)) is a πgr - closed in Z .
(gf) (V) is πgr - closed in Z for the closed set V of X .
(gf) is πgr - closed map.
Proposition:3.6
Let f : X →Y be a πgr- closed map, g : Y → Z be a closed map, Y is πgr -T1/2- space, then their composition
(gf) is a closed map.
Proof :
Let V be a closed set of X. Since f is a πgr - closed map, f(V) is πgr - closed in Y for every closed set V of X.
Since Y is a πgr -T1/2- space, f(V) is regular closed hence closed in Y.Since g is a closed map, then g(f(V)) is
closed in Z.
(gf) (V) is closed in Z for every closed set V of X and hence (g f) is a closed map.
Remark:3.7
a)Homeomorphism and πgr -homeomorphism are independent concepts.
b)Homeomorphism and πgrc -homeomorphism are independent concepts.
Example:3.8
(For both (a) and (b))
(i)Let X= { a,b,c}=Y,τ = { , X, {b} {b,c} {a,b}},σ = { ,Y,{a},{b},{a,b},{a,c}}.Let f : X→ Y be an identity
map. Here the inverse image of open subsets in Y are πgr-open in X and for every open set U of X, f(U) is πgr-
open in Y. Hence f is a πgr - homeomorphism .Also,f and f-1
are πgr-irresolute and hence f is a πgrc-
homeomorphism.
But inverse image of open subsets in Y are not open in X and inverse image of open set U in X is not open in Y.
Hence f is not a homeomorphism . Thus πgr-homeomorphism and πgrc-homeomorphism need not be a
homeomorphism.
(ii)Let X={a,b,c,d}=Y, τ ={ ,X,{c},{d},{c,d},{b,d},{a,c,d},{b,c,d},σ ={ ,Y,{a},{d},{a,d}, {c,d},{
a,c,d},{a,b,d}}.Let f : X → Y be defined by f(a) = b, f(b) = c, f(c) =a, f(d) = d. Here the inverse image of open
sets in (Y, ) are open in (X, ) and the image of open sets in X are open in Y. Hence f is a homeomorphism
.But the inverse image of open sets in (Y, ) are not πgr-open in (X, ) and also the image of open sets in X are
not πgr-open in Y. Hence f is not a πgr - homeomorphism . Also, here f and f-1
are not πgr-irresolute and hence
not a πgrc-homeomorphism.
Remark:3.9
The concepts of πgrc - homeomorphism and πgr- homeomorphism are independent.
Example:3.10
a)Let X ={a,b,c}=Y,τ = { ,X,{b},{a,b}},σ={ ,Y,{b}}.Let f : X Y be an identity map.
On Πgr - Homeomorphisms In…
www.ijmsi.org 14 | P a g e
Here the both f and f-1
are πgr- irresolute and not πgr –continuous . Hence πgrc - homeomorphism need not be a
πgr -homeomorphism.
b) Let X ={a,b,c}=Y, τ = { ,X,{a},{b},{a,b}},σ={ ,Y,{b}}. Let f : X Y be an identity map. Here the both
f and f-1
are πgr- continuous and not πgr- irresolute . Hence πgr -homeomorphism need not be a πgrc-
homeomorphism.
The above discussions are summarized in the following diagram:
Homeomorphism
πgr-homeomorphism πgrc-homeomorphism
Remark :3.11
We say the spaces (X,τ) and (Y,) are πgr -homeomorphic (πgrc-homeomorphic)if there exists a πgr-
homeomorphism(πgrc- homeomorphism) from (X, τ) onto (Y, ) respectively . The family of all πgr-
homeomorphism and πgrc-homeomorphisms are denoted by πgrh(X, τ) and πgrch(X, τ).
Proposition :3.12
For any bijection f : (X, τ) →(Y, ), the following statements are equivalent.
[1] f is a πgr - open map
[2] f is a πgr - closed map
[3] f-1
: Y → X is πgr - continuous .
Proof :
(i) (ii) :- Let f be a πgr - open map. Let U be a closed set in X. Then X – U is open in X
By assumption, f(X - U) is πgr - open in Y.
ie, Y – f(X – U) = f(U) is πgr - closed in Y. ie, for a closed set U in X, f(U) is πgr - closed in Y.Hence f is a
πgr - closed map.
(ii) (i) :- let V be a closed set in X .By (ii), f(V) is πgr - closed in Y and f(V) = (f-1
)-1
(V)
f-1
(V) is πgr - closed in Y for the closed set V in Y
f-1
is πgr -continuous.
(iii) (ii) :- let V be open in X .By (iii), (f-1
)-1
(V) = f(V) ie, f(V) in πgr - open in Y
Hence f is a πgr -open map.
Proposition :3.13
Let f : X→Y be a bijective πgr- continuous map. Then the following are equivalent.
[1] f is a πgr -open map.
[2] f is a πgr- homeomorphism.
[3] f is a πgr - closed map.
(i) (iii) also (iii) (i)
f is a πgr- closed map f-1
is πgr - continuous.
Then by part (i) and by the above argument together implies f is a homeomorphism and hence (ii) holds.
Proposition : 3.14
For any bijection f : (X, τ)→(Y, ) the following statements are equivalent.
[1] f-1
: Y →X is πgr - irresolute .
On Πgr - Homeomorphisms In…
www.ijmsi.org 15 | P a g e
[2] f is an M- πgr- open map .
[3] f is a M- πgr- closed map.
Proof : (i) (ii) :Let U be a πgr - open set in Y .
By (i), (f-1
)-1
(U) = f(U) is πgr - open in Y.
ie, For the πgr - open set U, f(U) is πgr- open in Y
f is an M - πgr -open map.
(ii) (iii): Let f be an M- πgr- open map
let V be πgr - closed set in X .Then X – V is πgr - open in X. Since f is an - πgr- open map, f(X – V) is πgr-
open in Y..
ie, f(X – V) = Y – f(V) is πgr - open in Y .ie, f(V) is πgr-closed in Y and hence f is an M- πgr- closed map.
(iii) (i): let V be πgr- closed in X .By (iii), f(V) is πgr - closed in Y.Since f-1
is Y X be a mapping and is a
bijection. Again we say that for f(V), πgr - closed in Y, its inverse image (f-1
)-1
(V) is πgr - closed in Y.Hence
f-1
is πgr- irresolute .
Remark : 3.15
Composition of two πgr -homeomorphisms need not be a πgr -homeomorphism.
Example:3.16
Let X = Y = Z={a,b,c},τ={ ,X,{a},{b},{a,b}},σ = { ,Y,{a},{a,b}},η={ ,Z,{c}}. Let us define the mapping
f: X→Y by f(a) = b, f(b) = a, f(c) = c and g:Y→Z by g(a) = b,g(b) = a,
g(c) = c. Here f and g are πgr-homeomorphisms but (g f) is not πgr-continuous and not πgr-open.
ie, (gof)-1
{c} = {c} is not πgr -open in X
Hence composition of two πgr - homeomorphism is not always be a πgr-homeomorphism.
Theorem:3.17
The composition of two πgrc - homeomorphism is a πgrc-homeomorphism .
Proof :
let f : (X, τ) →(Y, ) and g : (Y, ) → (Z,η) be two πgrc - homeomorphic functions.
Let F be a πgr - closed set in Z. Since g is a πgr - irresolute map, g-1
(F) is πgr - closed in (Y, ).Since f is a
πgr - irresolute map, f-1
(g-1
(F)) is πgr - closed in X.
(gof)-1
(F) is πgr - closed in X
(gof) is πgr - irresolute.
Let G be a πgr - closed set in (X,τ).Since f-1
is πgr - irresolute, (f-1
)-1
(G) is πgr - closed in (Y, ).ie, f(G) is πgr
- closed in (Y, )
Since g-1
is πgr - irresolute, (g-1
)-1
(f(G)) = g(f(G)) is πgr- closed in Z
 g(f(G)) = (gof) (G) is πgr - closed in Z.
(gof)-1
(G) is πgr - closed in Z.
This shows that (gof)-1
: Y → Z is πgr - irresolute.
Hence (gof) is πgrc- homeomorphism.
Theorem :3.18
Let (Y, ) be πgr-T1/2- space. If f : X → Y and g : Y → Z are πgr- homeomorphism, then g f is a πgr-
homeomorphism.
Proof:
If f : X → Y and g : Y → Z be two πgr- homeomorphism. Let U be an open set in (X, τ). Since f is πgr- open
map, f(U) is πgr- open in Y.
Since Y is a πgr-T1/2- space, f(U) is regular open in Y and hence open in Y.
Also, since g is πgr- open map, g(f(U)) is πgr- open in Z.
On Πgr - Homeomorphisms In…
www.ijmsi.org 16 | P a g e
Hence (gof) (U) = g([f(U)] is πgr- open in Z for every open set U of X.
(gf) is a πgr- open map.
Let U be a closed set in Z .
Since g is πgr- continuous, g-1
(U) is πgr- closed in Y.
Since Y is a πgr-T1/2- space, every πgr- closed set in Y is regular closed in Y and hence closed in Y.
g-1
(V) is regular closed in Y and hence closed in Y.
Since f is πgr - continuous, f-1
[g-1
(V)] is πgr- closed set in X
(gof)-1
(V) is πgr-closed in X for every closed set V in Z.
(gof) is πgr-continuous and hence (gof) is a πgr-homeomorphism.
Remark: 3.19
Even though πgr- homeomorphism and πgrc- homeomorphism are independent concepts, we have the
following results( theorem 3.20 and theorem 3.21)
Theorem:3.20
Every πgr- homeomorphism from a πgr-T1/2- space into another πgr-T1/2- space is a homeomorphism.
Proof :
let f : X → Y be a πgr - homeomorphism. Then f is bijective, πgr- open and πgr- continuous map. Let U be an
open set in (X, τ).Since f is πgr- open and Y is πgr-T1/2- space, f(U) is πgr- open in Y.Since Y is a πgr-T1/2-
space, every πgr-open set is regular open in Y
f(U) is Regular open and hence open in Y.
f is an open map.
Let Y be a closed set in (Y, ). Since f is πgr- continuous, f-1
(V) is πgr-closed in X. Since X is a πgr-T1/2 -space,
every πgr - closed set is regular closed and hence closed in X.
Therefore, f is continuous.
Hence f is a homeomorphism.
Theorem:3.21
Every πgr- homeomorphism from a πgr-T1/2- space into another πgr-T1/2- space is a πgrc- homeomorphism.
Proof :
Let f : X → Y be a πgr - homeomorphism
Let U be πgr- closed in Y. Since Y is a πgr-T1/2- space, every πgr-closed set is regular closed and hence closed
in Y.
U is closed in Y.
Since f is πgr- continuous, f-1
(U) is πgr- closed in X.
Hence f is a πgr- irresolute map.
Let U be πgr- open set in X.
Since X is a πgr-T1/2- space, U is Regular open and hence open in X.
Since f is a πgr- open map, f(U) is πgr- open set in Y.
(f-1
)-1
= f ie, (f-1
)-1
(U) = f(U) is πgr- open in Y
Hence inverse image of (f-1
) is πgr- open in Y for every πgr- open set U of X and hence f-1
is πgr- irresolute.
Hence f is πgrc- homeomorphism.
Remark :3.22
Here, we shall introduce the group structure of the set of all πgrc- homeomorphism from a topological space
(X, τ) onto itself and denote it by πgrch-(X,τ).
Theorem :3.23
The set πgrch-(X,τ) is a group under composition of mappings.
Proof :
On Πgr - Homeomorphisms In…
www.ijmsi.org 17 | P a g e
We know that the composition of two πgrch(X,τ) is again a πgrch(X,τ).ie, For all f, g  πgrch(X,τ), gf
πgrch(X, τ).We know that the composition of mappings is associative, the identity map belongs to πgrch(X,τ)
acts as an identity element. If f πgrch(X,τ),then f-1
 πgrch(X, τ) such that f f-1
= f-1
f = I and so inverse
exists for each element of πgrch(X, τ).
Hence πgrc- homeomorphism (X, τ) is a group under the composition of mappings.
Theorem :3.24
Let f : (X, τ) →(Y, ) be a πgrc- homeomorphism. Then f induces an isomorphism from the group πgrch(X,τ)
onto the group πgrch(Y, ).
Proof :
We define a map,f* : πgrch(X,τ) → πgrch(Y, ) by f*(k) = f k f-1
every k  πgrch(X,τ)
Then f* is a bijection and also for all k1, k2  πgrc- homeomorphism (X, τ)
f* (k1 k2) = f (k1 k2) f-1
= (fk1 f-1
)  (fk2 f-1
)
= f* (k1) o f* (k2)
Hence f* is a homeomorphism and so it is an isomorphism induced by f.
Theorem :3.25
πgrc-homeomorphism is an equivalence relation in the collection of all topological spaces.
Proof :
Reflexivity and symmetry are immediate and transitivity follows from the fact that the composition of πgr-
irresolute maps is πgr-irresolute.
Proposition :3.26
For any two subsets A and B of (X, τ)
[1] If A  B, then πgr- cl (A)  πgr- cl (B)
[2] πgr- cl (AB)  πgr- cl (A)  πgr- cl (B)
Theorem :3.27
If f : (X, τ) → (Y, ) is a πgrc- homeomorphism and suppose πgr-closed set of X is closed under arbitrary
intersections, then πgr-cl(f-1
(B)) = f-1
(πgr- cl(B) for all B  Y.
Proof :
Since f is a πgrc-homeomorphism, f and f-1
are πgr - irresolute.
Since f is π-irresolute, πgr - cl (f(B)) is a πgr - closed set in (Y, ), f-1
[πgr-cl (f(B)] is πgr - closed in (X, τ).
Now, f-1
(B)  f-1
(πgr - cl f(B))
and πgr - cl (f-1
(B))  f-1
(πgr - cl(B)) 
Again, since f is a πgrc- homeomorphism, f-1
is πgr -irresolute. Since πgr - cl (f-1
(B)) is πgr - closed in X,
(f-1
)-1
[πgr - cl (f-1
(B))]= f (πgr - cl (f-1
(B)) is πgr - closed in Y.
Now, B  (f-1
)-1
(f-1
(B))
 (f-1
)-1
(πgr - cl (f-1
(B))
= f (πgr - cl (f-1
(B))
So, πgr - cl (B)  f (πgr - cl (f-1
(B))
 f-1
(πgr -cl(B))  πgr - cl (f-1
(B)) 
From  & , the equality πgr-cl(f-1
(B)) = f-1
(πgr- cl(B) holds and hence the proof.
Corollary :3.28
If f : X → Y is a πgrc-homeomorphism, then πgr - cl (f(B)) =f(πgr - cl (B)) for all B  X.
Proof :
Since f : X → Y is a πgrc- homeomorphism, f-1
: Y→ X is a πgrc- homeomorphism.
By previous theorem,
πgr - cl ((f-1
)-1
(B)) = (f-1
)-1
(πgr -cl(B)) for all B  X
πgr -cl (f(B)) = f(πgr -cl(B))
On Πgr - Homeomorphisms In…
www.ijmsi.org 18 | P a g e
Corollary :3.29
If f : X →Y is a πgrc - homeomorphism, then f(πgr - int (B)) = πgr -int(f(B)) for all B  X
Proof :
For any set B  X, πgr -int (B) = [πgr - cl(BC
)]C
By previous corollary, we obtain
f (πgr -int (B)) = f [πgr - cl(BC
)C
]
= [f (πgr - cl(BC
)]C
= [πgr -cl(f(BC
)]C
= [πgr - cl(f(BC
)]C
= πgr - int(f(B))
Corollary :3.30
If f : X → Y is a πgrc- homeomorphism, then f-1
(πgr -int (B)) = πgr -int(f-1
(B)) for all B  Y
Proof :
If f-1
: Y → X is also a πgrc - homeomorphism, the proof follows by using corollary 3.29.
REFERENCES
[1] I.Arokiarani, “Studies on generalizations of generalized closed sets and maps in topological spaces, Ph.D, Thesis, Bharathiar
University, Coimbatore(1997).
[2] D.A.Carnahan,”Some properties related to compactness in topological spaces ”, Ph.D. Thesis ,Univ.of Arkansas(1973).
[3] R.Devi, K.Balachandran H.Maki, “Semi generalized homoeomorphism and generalized semi-homeomorphism in topological
spaces, 26(1995),no .3,271-284.
[4] Dontchev.J, Noiri.T, “Quasi normal spaces and πg-closed sets”, Acta Math. Hungar , 89 (3), 2000,211-219.
[5] R. C. Jain, The role of regularly open sets in general topology, Ph. D. thesis, Meerut University, Institute of Advanced Studies,
Meerut, India 1980.
[6] C.Janaki and V.Jeyanthi,“On gr-separation axioms”, IJMER,Vol 4, (4), April -2014,7-13.
[7] V.Jeyanthi and C.Janaki, “gr-closed sets in topological spaces “,Asian Journal of current Engg. And Maths 1:5 , sep 2012, 241-
246.
[8] V.Jeyanthi. and Janaki ,” On πgr-continuous functions in topological spaces ”, IJERA , Vol 1, issue 3, Jan-Feb-2013.
[9] N. Levine, Generalized closed sets in topology, Rend. Cir. Mat. Palermo, 19(1970), 89- 96.
[10] N.Levine, Semi-open sets and semi-continuity in topological spaces, Amer. Math. Monthly 70(1963), 36-41.
[11] P.E.Long and L.L.Herington, Basic properties of regular closed functions , Rend, Cir. Mat. Palermo, 27(1978),20-28.
[12] H.Maki,P.Sundaram, K.Balachandran, On Generalized homeomorphisms in topological spaces, Bull. Fukuoka Univ.Ed.Part-
III,40(1991),13-21.
[13] S.R.Malghan, Generalized closed maps, J.Karnatk Univ. Eci., 27(1982), 82-88.
[14] N.Nagaveni, Studies on generalizations of homeomorphisms in topological spaces, Ph.D, Thesis, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore
(1999).
[15] T.Noiri,”Mildly normal space and some functions”, Kyungpook Math .J.36(1996)183- 190.
[16] N.Palaniappan and K.C.Rao,”Regular generalized closed sets ” , Kyungpook Math .J. 33(1993), 211-219.
[17] M.K.Singal and A.R. Mathur, Anote on mildly compact spaces, Kyungpook. Math.J.9(1979),165-168.
[18] V.Zaitsav, On certain classes of topological spaces and their bicompactifications, Dokl Akad Nauk , SSSR (178), 778-779.

More Related Content

What's hot

Continuous And Irresolute Functions Via Star Generalised Closed Sets
Continuous And Irresolute Functions Via Star Generalised Closed SetsContinuous And Irresolute Functions Via Star Generalised Closed Sets
Continuous And Irresolute Functions Via Star Generalised Closed Sets
IJMERJOURNAL
 
On Some Continuous and Irresolute Maps In Ideal Topological Spaces
On Some Continuous and Irresolute Maps In Ideal Topological SpacesOn Some Continuous and Irresolute Maps In Ideal Topological Spaces
On Some Continuous and Irresolute Maps In Ideal Topological Spaces
iosrjce
 
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
inventionjournals
 
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
inventionjournals
 
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and ScienceResearch Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
inventy
 
On Decomposition of gr* - closed set in Topological Spaces
	On Decomposition of gr* - closed set in Topological Spaces	On Decomposition of gr* - closed set in Topological Spaces
On Decomposition of gr* - closed set in Topological Spaces
inventionjournals
 
Some forms of N-closed Maps in supra Topological spaces
Some forms of N-closed Maps in supra Topological spacesSome forms of N-closed Maps in supra Topological spaces
Some forms of N-closed Maps in supra Topological spaces
IOSR Journals
 
(𝛕𝐢, 𝛕𝐣)− RGB Closed Sets in Bitopological Spaces
(𝛕𝐢, 𝛕𝐣)− RGB Closed Sets in Bitopological Spaces(𝛕𝐢, 𝛕𝐣)− RGB Closed Sets in Bitopological Spaces
(𝛕𝐢, 𝛕𝐣)− RGB Closed Sets in Bitopological Spaces
IOSR Journals
 
Ba32759764
Ba32759764Ba32759764
Ba32759764
IJMER
 
On the-approximate-solution-of-a-nonlinear-singular-integral-equation
On the-approximate-solution-of-a-nonlinear-singular-integral-equationOn the-approximate-solution-of-a-nonlinear-singular-integral-equation
On the-approximate-solution-of-a-nonlinear-singular-integral-equation
Cemal Ardil
 
Contra  * Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
Contra   * Continuous Functions in Topological SpacesContra   * Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
Contra  * Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
IJMER
 
μ-πrα Closed Sets in Bigeneralized Topological Spaces
μ-πrα Closed Sets in Bigeneralized Topological Spacesμ-πrα Closed Sets in Bigeneralized Topological Spaces
μ-πrα Closed Sets in Bigeneralized Topological Spaces
IJERA Editor
 
On (1,2)*-πgθ-CLOSED SETS IN BITOPOLOGICAL SPACES
On (1,2)*-πgθ-CLOSED SETS IN BITOPOLOGICAL SPACESOn (1,2)*-πgθ-CLOSED SETS IN BITOPOLOGICAL SPACES
On (1,2)*-πgθ-CLOSED SETS IN BITOPOLOGICAL SPACES
ijceronline
 
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and ScienceResearch Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
researchinventy
 
δ ˆ – Closed Sets in Ideal Topological Spaces
δ ˆ – Closed Sets in Ideal Topological Spacesδ ˆ – Closed Sets in Ideal Topological Spaces
δ ˆ – Closed Sets in Ideal Topological Spaces
IOSR Journals
 
H25031037
H25031037H25031037
H25031037
IJERA Editor
 

What's hot (16)

Continuous And Irresolute Functions Via Star Generalised Closed Sets
Continuous And Irresolute Functions Via Star Generalised Closed SetsContinuous And Irresolute Functions Via Star Generalised Closed Sets
Continuous And Irresolute Functions Via Star Generalised Closed Sets
 
On Some Continuous and Irresolute Maps In Ideal Topological Spaces
On Some Continuous and Irresolute Maps In Ideal Topological SpacesOn Some Continuous and Irresolute Maps In Ideal Topological Spaces
On Some Continuous and Irresolute Maps In Ideal Topological Spaces
 
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
 
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
 
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and ScienceResearch Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
 
On Decomposition of gr* - closed set in Topological Spaces
	On Decomposition of gr* - closed set in Topological Spaces	On Decomposition of gr* - closed set in Topological Spaces
On Decomposition of gr* - closed set in Topological Spaces
 
Some forms of N-closed Maps in supra Topological spaces
Some forms of N-closed Maps in supra Topological spacesSome forms of N-closed Maps in supra Topological spaces
Some forms of N-closed Maps in supra Topological spaces
 
(𝛕𝐢, 𝛕𝐣)− RGB Closed Sets in Bitopological Spaces
(𝛕𝐢, 𝛕𝐣)− RGB Closed Sets in Bitopological Spaces(𝛕𝐢, 𝛕𝐣)− RGB Closed Sets in Bitopological Spaces
(𝛕𝐢, 𝛕𝐣)− RGB Closed Sets in Bitopological Spaces
 
Ba32759764
Ba32759764Ba32759764
Ba32759764
 
On the-approximate-solution-of-a-nonlinear-singular-integral-equation
On the-approximate-solution-of-a-nonlinear-singular-integral-equationOn the-approximate-solution-of-a-nonlinear-singular-integral-equation
On the-approximate-solution-of-a-nonlinear-singular-integral-equation
 
Contra  * Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
Contra   * Continuous Functions in Topological SpacesContra   * Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
Contra  * Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
 
μ-πrα Closed Sets in Bigeneralized Topological Spaces
μ-πrα Closed Sets in Bigeneralized Topological Spacesμ-πrα Closed Sets in Bigeneralized Topological Spaces
μ-πrα Closed Sets in Bigeneralized Topological Spaces
 
On (1,2)*-πgθ-CLOSED SETS IN BITOPOLOGICAL SPACES
On (1,2)*-πgθ-CLOSED SETS IN BITOPOLOGICAL SPACESOn (1,2)*-πgθ-CLOSED SETS IN BITOPOLOGICAL SPACES
On (1,2)*-πgθ-CLOSED SETS IN BITOPOLOGICAL SPACES
 
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and ScienceResearch Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
 
δ ˆ – Closed Sets in Ideal Topological Spaces
δ ˆ – Closed Sets in Ideal Topological Spacesδ ˆ – Closed Sets in Ideal Topological Spaces
δ ˆ – Closed Sets in Ideal Topological Spaces
 
H25031037
H25031037H25031037
H25031037
 

Similar to C027011018

C027011018
C027011018C027011018
C027011018
inventionjournals
 
C027011018
C027011018C027011018
C027011018
inventionjournals
 
Ci31360364
Ci31360364Ci31360364
Ci31360364
IJMER
 
RW-CLOSED MAPS AND RW-OPEN MAPS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES
RW-CLOSED MAPS AND RW-OPEN MAPS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACESRW-CLOSED MAPS AND RW-OPEN MAPS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES
RW-CLOSED MAPS AND RW-OPEN MAPS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES
Editor IJCATR
 
Cd32939943
Cd32939943Cd32939943
Cd32939943
IJMER
 
ON β-NORMAL SPACES
ON β-NORMAL SPACES ON β-NORMAL SPACES
ON β-NORMAL SPACES
mathsjournal
 
ON β-NORMAL SPACES
ON β-NORMAL SPACES ON β-NORMAL SPACES
ON β-NORMAL SPACES
mathsjournal
 
ON β-Normal Spaces
ON β-Normal SpacesON β-Normal Spaces
ON β-Normal Spaces
mathsjournal
 
On Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
On Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological SpacesOn Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
On Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
IJMER
 
11. gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
11. gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces11. gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
11. gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
Alexander Decker
 
Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
 Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
Alexander Decker
 
Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
 Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
Alexander Decker
 
ON SEMI-  -CONTINUITY WHERE   {L, M, R, S}
ON SEMI-  -CONTINUITY WHERE   {L, M, R, S}ON SEMI-  -CONTINUITY WHERE   {L, M, R, S}
ON SEMI-  -CONTINUITY WHERE   {L, M, R, S}
International Journal of Technical Research & Application
 
18MMA21C-U2.pdf
18MMA21C-U2.pdf18MMA21C-U2.pdf
18MMA21C-U2.pdf
SureshK256753
 
Note on closed sets in topological spaces
Note on    closed sets in topological spacesNote on    closed sets in topological spaces
Note on closed sets in topological spaces
Alexander Decker
 
Postdoctoral research statement
Postdoctoral research statementPostdoctoral research statement
Postdoctoral research statement
Susovan Pal
 
On fuzzy compact open topology
On fuzzy compact open topologyOn fuzzy compact open topology
On fuzzy compact open topology
bkrawat08
 
H25031037
H25031037H25031037
H25031037
IJERA Editor
 
The Relationship between Kernel Set and Separation via ω-Open Set
The Relationship between Kernel Set and Separation via ω-Open SetThe Relationship between Kernel Set and Separation via ω-Open Set
The Relationship between Kernel Set and Separation via ω-Open Set
paperpublications3
 
Some properties of gi closed sets in topological space.docx
Some properties of gi  closed sets in topological space.docxSome properties of gi  closed sets in topological space.docx
Some properties of gi closed sets in topological space.docx
Alexander Decker
 

Similar to C027011018 (20)

C027011018
C027011018C027011018
C027011018
 
C027011018
C027011018C027011018
C027011018
 
Ci31360364
Ci31360364Ci31360364
Ci31360364
 
RW-CLOSED MAPS AND RW-OPEN MAPS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES
RW-CLOSED MAPS AND RW-OPEN MAPS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACESRW-CLOSED MAPS AND RW-OPEN MAPS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES
RW-CLOSED MAPS AND RW-OPEN MAPS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES
 
Cd32939943
Cd32939943Cd32939943
Cd32939943
 
ON β-NORMAL SPACES
ON β-NORMAL SPACES ON β-NORMAL SPACES
ON β-NORMAL SPACES
 
ON β-NORMAL SPACES
ON β-NORMAL SPACES ON β-NORMAL SPACES
ON β-NORMAL SPACES
 
ON β-Normal Spaces
ON β-Normal SpacesON β-Normal Spaces
ON β-Normal Spaces
 
On Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
On Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological SpacesOn Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
On Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
 
11. gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
11. gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces11. gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
11. gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
 
Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
 Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
 
Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
 Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
 
ON SEMI-  -CONTINUITY WHERE   {L, M, R, S}
ON SEMI-  -CONTINUITY WHERE   {L, M, R, S}ON SEMI-  -CONTINUITY WHERE   {L, M, R, S}
ON SEMI-  -CONTINUITY WHERE   {L, M, R, S}
 
18MMA21C-U2.pdf
18MMA21C-U2.pdf18MMA21C-U2.pdf
18MMA21C-U2.pdf
 
Note on closed sets in topological spaces
Note on    closed sets in topological spacesNote on    closed sets in topological spaces
Note on closed sets in topological spaces
 
Postdoctoral research statement
Postdoctoral research statementPostdoctoral research statement
Postdoctoral research statement
 
On fuzzy compact open topology
On fuzzy compact open topologyOn fuzzy compact open topology
On fuzzy compact open topology
 
H25031037
H25031037H25031037
H25031037
 
The Relationship between Kernel Set and Separation via ω-Open Set
The Relationship between Kernel Set and Separation via ω-Open SetThe Relationship between Kernel Set and Separation via ω-Open Set
The Relationship between Kernel Set and Separation via ω-Open Set
 
Some properties of gi closed sets in topological space.docx
Some properties of gi  closed sets in topological space.docxSome properties of gi  closed sets in topological space.docx
Some properties of gi closed sets in topological space.docx
 

Recently uploaded

Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slack
Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with SlackLet's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slack
Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slack
shyamraj55
 
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FMEEssentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
Safe Software
 
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
SOFTTECHHUB
 
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの?40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの?えこ...
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの?40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの?えこ...みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの?40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの?えこ...
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの?40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの?えこ...
名前 です男
 
GenAI Pilot Implementation in the organizations
GenAI Pilot Implementation in the organizationsGenAI Pilot Implementation in the organizations
GenAI Pilot Implementation in the organizations
kumardaparthi1024
 
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing DaysClimate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
Kari Kakkonen
 
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software Fuzzing
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software FuzzingRemoving Uninteresting Bytes in Software Fuzzing
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software Fuzzing
Aftab Hussain
 
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...
Neo4j
 
GraphRAG for Life Science to increase LLM accuracy
GraphRAG for Life Science to increase LLM accuracyGraphRAG for Life Science to increase LLM accuracy
GraphRAG for Life Science to increase LLM accuracy
Tomaz Bratanic
 
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
DianaGray10
 
20240609 QFM020 Irresponsible AI Reading List May 2024
20240609 QFM020 Irresponsible AI Reading List May 202420240609 QFM020 Irresponsible AI Reading List May 2024
20240609 QFM020 Irresponsible AI Reading List May 2024
Matthew Sinclair
 
Uni Systems Copilot event_05062024_C.Vlachos.pdf
Uni Systems Copilot event_05062024_C.Vlachos.pdfUni Systems Copilot event_05062024_C.Vlachos.pdf
Uni Systems Copilot event_05062024_C.Vlachos.pdf
Uni Systems S.M.S.A.
 
20240607 QFM018 Elixir Reading List May 2024
20240607 QFM018 Elixir Reading List May 202420240607 QFM018 Elixir Reading List May 2024
20240607 QFM018 Elixir Reading List May 2024
Matthew Sinclair
 
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
Neo4j
 
Full-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalization
Full-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalizationFull-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalization
Full-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalization
Zilliz
 
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practicesNational Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
Quotidiano Piemontese
 
AI 101: An Introduction to the Basics and Impact of Artificial Intelligence
AI 101: An Introduction to the Basics and Impact of Artificial IntelligenceAI 101: An Introduction to the Basics and Impact of Artificial Intelligence
AI 101: An Introduction to the Basics and Impact of Artificial Intelligence
IndexBug
 
Microsoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdf
Microsoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdfMicrosoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdf
Microsoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdf
Uni Systems S.M.S.A.
 
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup Slides
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup SlidesProgramming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup Slides
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup Slides
Zilliz
 
Cosa hanno in comune un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ?
Cosa hanno in comune un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ?Cosa hanno in comune un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ?
Cosa hanno in comune un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ?
Speck&Tech
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slack
Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with SlackLet's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slack
Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slack
 
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FMEEssentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
 
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
 
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの?40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの?えこ...
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの?40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの?えこ...みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの?40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの?えこ...
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの?40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの?えこ...
 
GenAI Pilot Implementation in the organizations
GenAI Pilot Implementation in the organizationsGenAI Pilot Implementation in the organizations
GenAI Pilot Implementation in the organizations
 
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing DaysClimate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
 
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software Fuzzing
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software FuzzingRemoving Uninteresting Bytes in Software Fuzzing
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software Fuzzing
 
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...
 
GraphRAG for Life Science to increase LLM accuracy
GraphRAG for Life Science to increase LLM accuracyGraphRAG for Life Science to increase LLM accuracy
GraphRAG for Life Science to increase LLM accuracy
 
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
 
20240609 QFM020 Irresponsible AI Reading List May 2024
20240609 QFM020 Irresponsible AI Reading List May 202420240609 QFM020 Irresponsible AI Reading List May 2024
20240609 QFM020 Irresponsible AI Reading List May 2024
 
Uni Systems Copilot event_05062024_C.Vlachos.pdf
Uni Systems Copilot event_05062024_C.Vlachos.pdfUni Systems Copilot event_05062024_C.Vlachos.pdf
Uni Systems Copilot event_05062024_C.Vlachos.pdf
 
20240607 QFM018 Elixir Reading List May 2024
20240607 QFM018 Elixir Reading List May 202420240607 QFM018 Elixir Reading List May 2024
20240607 QFM018 Elixir Reading List May 2024
 
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
GraphSummit Singapore | Enhancing Changi Airport Group's Passenger Experience...
 
Full-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalization
Full-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalizationFull-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalization
Full-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalization
 
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practicesNational Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
 
AI 101: An Introduction to the Basics and Impact of Artificial Intelligence
AI 101: An Introduction to the Basics and Impact of Artificial IntelligenceAI 101: An Introduction to the Basics and Impact of Artificial Intelligence
AI 101: An Introduction to the Basics and Impact of Artificial Intelligence
 
Microsoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdf
Microsoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdfMicrosoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdf
Microsoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdf
 
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup Slides
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup SlidesProgramming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup Slides
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup Slides
 
Cosa hanno in comune un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ?
Cosa hanno in comune un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ?Cosa hanno in comune un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ?
Cosa hanno in comune un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ?
 

C027011018

  • 1. International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI) E-ISSN: 2321 – 4767 P-ISSN: 2321 - 4759 www.ijmsi.org Volume 2 Issue 7 || July. 2014 || PP-11-18 www.ijmsi.org 11 | P a g e On πgr - Homeomorphisms in Topological Spaces. 1, Janaki.C , 2, Jeyanthi.V 1. Asst. Professor/Mathematics, L.R.G. Govt.Arts College for Women, Tirupur- 4. 2. Asst.Professor/Mathematics, Sree Narayana Guru College , Coimbatore – 105. E-mail: 1.janakicsekar@yahoo.com 2.jeyanthi_sngc@yahoo.com ABSTRACT:The purpose of this paper is to introduce and study the concept of πgr -closed maps , πgr - homeomorphism ,πgrc - homeomorphism and obtain some of their characterizations. KEYWORDS: πgr-closed map, πgr-open map,πgr-homeomorphism and πgrc- homeomorphism. Mathematics subject classification: 54A05, 54D10. I. INTRODUCTION Levine [9]introduced the concept of generalized closed sets in topological spaces and a class of topological space called T1/2-space. The concept of -closed sets in topological spaces was initiated by Zaitsav[18] and the concept of g-closed set was introduced by Noiri and Dontchev[4]. N.Palaniappan[16] studied and introduced regular closed sets in topological spaces. Generalized closed mappings, wg-closed maps ,regular closed maps and rg-closed maps were introduced and studied by Malghan[13],Nagaveni[14],Long[11] and Arokiarani[1] respectively.Maki et al [12] who introduced generalized homeomorphism and gC- homeomorphism which are nothing but the generalizations of homeomorphism in topological spaces. Devi et al [3]defined and studied generalized semi-homeomorphism and gsc homeomorphism in topological spaces. In 2013,Jeyanthi.V and Janaki.C [6] introduced and studied the properties of πgr-closed sets in topological spaces. Here we introduce and study the concepts of πgr- homeomorphisms ,πgrc -homeomorphism and their relations. II. PRELIMINARIES Throughout this paper, X , Y and Z denote the topological spaces (X,τ),(Y,σ) and (Z,η) respectively, on which no separation axioms are assumed. Let us recall the following definitions. Definition:2.1 A subset A of a topological space X is said to be [1] a semi -open [10] if A cl (int(A)) and semi-closed if int (cl(A)) A [2] a regular open[16] if A = int (cl(A)) and regular closed if A = cl(int(A)) [3] π- open [18] if A is the finite union of regular open sets and the complement of π- open set is π- closed set in X. The family of all open sets [ regular open, π-open, semi open] sets of X will be denoted by O(X)(resp. RO(X), πO(X), SO(X)] Definition:2.2 A map f: X→Y is said to be [1] continuous [10]if f-1 (V) is closed in X for every closed set V in Y. [2] Regular continuous ( r-continuous) [16]if f-1 (V) is regular-closed in X for every closed set [3] V in Y. [4] An R-map[2] if f-1 (V) is regular closed in X for every regular closed set V of Y. [5] πgr-continuous[7,8] if f-1 (V) is πgr-closed in X for every closed set V in Y. [6] πgr-irresolute[7,8] if f-1 (V) is πgr-closed in X for every πgr -closed set V in Y. Definition :2.3 A space X is called a πgr-T1/2 space [7,8]if every πgr-closed set is regular closed. Definition:2.4 A map f: XY is called 1.closed [13 ]if f(U) is closed in Y for every closed set U of X.
  • 2. On Πgr - Homeomorphisms In… www.ijmsi.org 12 | P a g e 2.almost closed[ 17] if f(U) is closed in Y for every regular closed set U of X. 3.regular closed [11]if f(U) is regular closed in Y for every closed set U of X 4.rc-preserving [15]if f(U) is regular closed in Y for every regular closed set U of X. Definition:2.5[6] Let f : (X,τ)→(Y,σ) be a map. A map f is said to be [1] πgr -open if f(U) in πgr-open in Y for every open set U of X. [2] strongly gr-open map (M-gr-open)if f(V) is gr-open in Y for every gr-open set V in X. [3] quasi gr-open if f(V) is open in Y for every gr-open set V in X. [4] almost gr-open map if f(V) is gr-open in Y for every regular open set V in X. Definition:2.6 A bijection f:X→ Y is called a homeomorphism [12]if f is both continuous and open.((i.e), f & f-1 are continuous) III. πGR - HOMEOMORPHISMS Definition:3.1 A bijection f:X→ Y is called [1] πgr - homeomorphism if f is both πgr- continuous and πgr - open.((i.e), f & f-1 are πgr -continuous) [2] πgrc - homeomorphism if f and f-1 are πgr- irresolute. Proposition :3.2 If a mapping f : X → Y is πgr -closed, then for every subset A of X, πgr- cl f(A)  f(cl(A)) Proof: Suppose f is πgr -closed and let A  X .Then f(cl(A)) is πgr - closed in (Y, ). We have f(A)  f(cl(A)). Then πgr -cl(f(A))  πgr -cl [f(cl(A))] = f(cl(A)) πgr -cl (f(A))  f(cl(A)) Theorem :3.3 Let f : X → Y and g : Y → Z be two mappings such that their composition g f : X → Y be a πgr - closed map.Then [1] f is continuous and surjective, then g is πgr- closed. [2] g is πgr- irresolute and injective, then f is πgr - closed. [3] f is πgr- continuous, surjective and X is a πgr-T1/2- space, then g is πgr - closed. Proof : (i)Let V be a closed set of Y. Since f is Continuous, f-1 (V) is closed in X. Since (g f) is πgr -closed in Z, (g  f) (f-1 (V)) is πgr- closed in Z. g(f(f-1 (V)) = g(V) is πgr - closed in Z.(Since f is surjective) ie, for the closed set V of Y, g(V) is πgr- closed in Z. g is a πgr - closed map. (ii)Let V be a closed set of X .Since (g f) is πgr - closed ,(g f) (V) is πgr- closed in Z. Since g is πgr - irresolute,g-1 [(g f)(V)] is πgr - closed in Y. g-1 [g(f(V))] is πgr closed in Y f(V) is πgr - closed in Y. Hence f is a πgr - closed map. (iii)Let V be a closed set of Y Since f is πgr - continuous, f-1 (V) is πgr - closed in X for every closed set V of Y.Since X is πgr -T1/2- space, f-1 (V) is regular closed in X and hence closed in X. Now, as in (i), g is a πgr- closed map. (iv)Let V be a closed set of Y Since f is πgr - continuous, f-1 (V) is πgr- closed in X. Since X is πgr -T1/2- space, f-1 (V) is regular closed in X and hence closed in X. Now, the proof as in (i), g is a πgr- closed map.
  • 3. On Πgr - Homeomorphisms In… www.ijmsi.org 13 | P a g e Proposition :3.4 Let f : X → Y and g : Y → Z be πgr - closed maps and Y is a πgr-T1/2- space, then their composition g  f : X→ Z is a πgr - closed map. Proof : Let f : X → Y be a closed map. Then for the closed set V of X, f(V) is πgr - closed in Y. Since Y is a πgr -T1/2 space, f(V) is regular closed in Y and hence closed in Y.Again, since g is a πgr - closed map, g(f(V)) is πgr - closed in Z for the closed set f(V) of Y . (gf) (V) is πgr - closed in Z for the closed set V of X . (gf) is a πgr -closed map. Proposition :3.5 Let f : (X, τ) → (Y, ) be a closed map and g : (Y, ) → (Z,η ) be a πgr - closed map, then their composition g f : (X, τ) →(Z,η ) is πgr - continuous. Proof :Let V be a closed set of X. Since f is a closed map, f (V) is closed in Y. Again, since g is a πgr - closed map, g(f(V)) is a πgr - closed in Z . (gf) (V) is πgr - closed in Z for the closed set V of X . (gf) is πgr - closed map. Proposition:3.6 Let f : X →Y be a πgr- closed map, g : Y → Z be a closed map, Y is πgr -T1/2- space, then their composition (gf) is a closed map. Proof : Let V be a closed set of X. Since f is a πgr - closed map, f(V) is πgr - closed in Y for every closed set V of X. Since Y is a πgr -T1/2- space, f(V) is regular closed hence closed in Y.Since g is a closed map, then g(f(V)) is closed in Z. (gf) (V) is closed in Z for every closed set V of X and hence (g f) is a closed map. Remark:3.7 a)Homeomorphism and πgr -homeomorphism are independent concepts. b)Homeomorphism and πgrc -homeomorphism are independent concepts. Example:3.8 (For both (a) and (b)) (i)Let X= { a,b,c}=Y,τ = { , X, {b} {b,c} {a,b}},σ = { ,Y,{a},{b},{a,b},{a,c}}.Let f : X→ Y be an identity map. Here the inverse image of open subsets in Y are πgr-open in X and for every open set U of X, f(U) is πgr- open in Y. Hence f is a πgr - homeomorphism .Also,f and f-1 are πgr-irresolute and hence f is a πgrc- homeomorphism. But inverse image of open subsets in Y are not open in X and inverse image of open set U in X is not open in Y. Hence f is not a homeomorphism . Thus πgr-homeomorphism and πgrc-homeomorphism need not be a homeomorphism. (ii)Let X={a,b,c,d}=Y, τ ={ ,X,{c},{d},{c,d},{b,d},{a,c,d},{b,c,d},σ ={ ,Y,{a},{d},{a,d}, {c,d},{ a,c,d},{a,b,d}}.Let f : X → Y be defined by f(a) = b, f(b) = c, f(c) =a, f(d) = d. Here the inverse image of open sets in (Y, ) are open in (X, ) and the image of open sets in X are open in Y. Hence f is a homeomorphism .But the inverse image of open sets in (Y, ) are not πgr-open in (X, ) and also the image of open sets in X are not πgr-open in Y. Hence f is not a πgr - homeomorphism . Also, here f and f-1 are not πgr-irresolute and hence not a πgrc-homeomorphism. Remark:3.9 The concepts of πgrc - homeomorphism and πgr- homeomorphism are independent. Example:3.10 a)Let X ={a,b,c}=Y,τ = { ,X,{b},{a,b}},σ={ ,Y,{b}}.Let f : X Y be an identity map.
  • 4. On Πgr - Homeomorphisms In… www.ijmsi.org 14 | P a g e Here the both f and f-1 are πgr- irresolute and not πgr –continuous . Hence πgrc - homeomorphism need not be a πgr -homeomorphism. b) Let X ={a,b,c}=Y, τ = { ,X,{a},{b},{a,b}},σ={ ,Y,{b}}. Let f : X Y be an identity map. Here the both f and f-1 are πgr- continuous and not πgr- irresolute . Hence πgr -homeomorphism need not be a πgrc- homeomorphism. The above discussions are summarized in the following diagram: Homeomorphism πgr-homeomorphism πgrc-homeomorphism Remark :3.11 We say the spaces (X,τ) and (Y,) are πgr -homeomorphic (πgrc-homeomorphic)if there exists a πgr- homeomorphism(πgrc- homeomorphism) from (X, τ) onto (Y, ) respectively . The family of all πgr- homeomorphism and πgrc-homeomorphisms are denoted by πgrh(X, τ) and πgrch(X, τ). Proposition :3.12 For any bijection f : (X, τ) →(Y, ), the following statements are equivalent. [1] f is a πgr - open map [2] f is a πgr - closed map [3] f-1 : Y → X is πgr - continuous . Proof : (i) (ii) :- Let f be a πgr - open map. Let U be a closed set in X. Then X – U is open in X By assumption, f(X - U) is πgr - open in Y. ie, Y – f(X – U) = f(U) is πgr - closed in Y. ie, for a closed set U in X, f(U) is πgr - closed in Y.Hence f is a πgr - closed map. (ii) (i) :- let V be a closed set in X .By (ii), f(V) is πgr - closed in Y and f(V) = (f-1 )-1 (V) f-1 (V) is πgr - closed in Y for the closed set V in Y f-1 is πgr -continuous. (iii) (ii) :- let V be open in X .By (iii), (f-1 )-1 (V) = f(V) ie, f(V) in πgr - open in Y Hence f is a πgr -open map. Proposition :3.13 Let f : X→Y be a bijective πgr- continuous map. Then the following are equivalent. [1] f is a πgr -open map. [2] f is a πgr- homeomorphism. [3] f is a πgr - closed map. (i) (iii) also (iii) (i) f is a πgr- closed map f-1 is πgr - continuous. Then by part (i) and by the above argument together implies f is a homeomorphism and hence (ii) holds. Proposition : 3.14 For any bijection f : (X, τ)→(Y, ) the following statements are equivalent. [1] f-1 : Y →X is πgr - irresolute .
  • 5. On Πgr - Homeomorphisms In… www.ijmsi.org 15 | P a g e [2] f is an M- πgr- open map . [3] f is a M- πgr- closed map. Proof : (i) (ii) :Let U be a πgr - open set in Y . By (i), (f-1 )-1 (U) = f(U) is πgr - open in Y. ie, For the πgr - open set U, f(U) is πgr- open in Y f is an M - πgr -open map. (ii) (iii): Let f be an M- πgr- open map let V be πgr - closed set in X .Then X – V is πgr - open in X. Since f is an - πgr- open map, f(X – V) is πgr- open in Y.. ie, f(X – V) = Y – f(V) is πgr - open in Y .ie, f(V) is πgr-closed in Y and hence f is an M- πgr- closed map. (iii) (i): let V be πgr- closed in X .By (iii), f(V) is πgr - closed in Y.Since f-1 is Y X be a mapping and is a bijection. Again we say that for f(V), πgr - closed in Y, its inverse image (f-1 )-1 (V) is πgr - closed in Y.Hence f-1 is πgr- irresolute . Remark : 3.15 Composition of two πgr -homeomorphisms need not be a πgr -homeomorphism. Example:3.16 Let X = Y = Z={a,b,c},τ={ ,X,{a},{b},{a,b}},σ = { ,Y,{a},{a,b}},η={ ,Z,{c}}. Let us define the mapping f: X→Y by f(a) = b, f(b) = a, f(c) = c and g:Y→Z by g(a) = b,g(b) = a, g(c) = c. Here f and g are πgr-homeomorphisms but (g f) is not πgr-continuous and not πgr-open. ie, (gof)-1 {c} = {c} is not πgr -open in X Hence composition of two πgr - homeomorphism is not always be a πgr-homeomorphism. Theorem:3.17 The composition of two πgrc - homeomorphism is a πgrc-homeomorphism . Proof : let f : (X, τ) →(Y, ) and g : (Y, ) → (Z,η) be two πgrc - homeomorphic functions. Let F be a πgr - closed set in Z. Since g is a πgr - irresolute map, g-1 (F) is πgr - closed in (Y, ).Since f is a πgr - irresolute map, f-1 (g-1 (F)) is πgr - closed in X. (gof)-1 (F) is πgr - closed in X (gof) is πgr - irresolute. Let G be a πgr - closed set in (X,τ).Since f-1 is πgr - irresolute, (f-1 )-1 (G) is πgr - closed in (Y, ).ie, f(G) is πgr - closed in (Y, ) Since g-1 is πgr - irresolute, (g-1 )-1 (f(G)) = g(f(G)) is πgr- closed in Z  g(f(G)) = (gof) (G) is πgr - closed in Z. (gof)-1 (G) is πgr - closed in Z. This shows that (gof)-1 : Y → Z is πgr - irresolute. Hence (gof) is πgrc- homeomorphism. Theorem :3.18 Let (Y, ) be πgr-T1/2- space. If f : X → Y and g : Y → Z are πgr- homeomorphism, then g f is a πgr- homeomorphism. Proof: If f : X → Y and g : Y → Z be two πgr- homeomorphism. Let U be an open set in (X, τ). Since f is πgr- open map, f(U) is πgr- open in Y. Since Y is a πgr-T1/2- space, f(U) is regular open in Y and hence open in Y. Also, since g is πgr- open map, g(f(U)) is πgr- open in Z.
  • 6. On Πgr - Homeomorphisms In… www.ijmsi.org 16 | P a g e Hence (gof) (U) = g([f(U)] is πgr- open in Z for every open set U of X. (gf) is a πgr- open map. Let U be a closed set in Z . Since g is πgr- continuous, g-1 (U) is πgr- closed in Y. Since Y is a πgr-T1/2- space, every πgr- closed set in Y is regular closed in Y and hence closed in Y. g-1 (V) is regular closed in Y and hence closed in Y. Since f is πgr - continuous, f-1 [g-1 (V)] is πgr- closed set in X (gof)-1 (V) is πgr-closed in X for every closed set V in Z. (gof) is πgr-continuous and hence (gof) is a πgr-homeomorphism. Remark: 3.19 Even though πgr- homeomorphism and πgrc- homeomorphism are independent concepts, we have the following results( theorem 3.20 and theorem 3.21) Theorem:3.20 Every πgr- homeomorphism from a πgr-T1/2- space into another πgr-T1/2- space is a homeomorphism. Proof : let f : X → Y be a πgr - homeomorphism. Then f is bijective, πgr- open and πgr- continuous map. Let U be an open set in (X, τ).Since f is πgr- open and Y is πgr-T1/2- space, f(U) is πgr- open in Y.Since Y is a πgr-T1/2- space, every πgr-open set is regular open in Y f(U) is Regular open and hence open in Y. f is an open map. Let Y be a closed set in (Y, ). Since f is πgr- continuous, f-1 (V) is πgr-closed in X. Since X is a πgr-T1/2 -space, every πgr - closed set is regular closed and hence closed in X. Therefore, f is continuous. Hence f is a homeomorphism. Theorem:3.21 Every πgr- homeomorphism from a πgr-T1/2- space into another πgr-T1/2- space is a πgrc- homeomorphism. Proof : Let f : X → Y be a πgr - homeomorphism Let U be πgr- closed in Y. Since Y is a πgr-T1/2- space, every πgr-closed set is regular closed and hence closed in Y. U is closed in Y. Since f is πgr- continuous, f-1 (U) is πgr- closed in X. Hence f is a πgr- irresolute map. Let U be πgr- open set in X. Since X is a πgr-T1/2- space, U is Regular open and hence open in X. Since f is a πgr- open map, f(U) is πgr- open set in Y. (f-1 )-1 = f ie, (f-1 )-1 (U) = f(U) is πgr- open in Y Hence inverse image of (f-1 ) is πgr- open in Y for every πgr- open set U of X and hence f-1 is πgr- irresolute. Hence f is πgrc- homeomorphism. Remark :3.22 Here, we shall introduce the group structure of the set of all πgrc- homeomorphism from a topological space (X, τ) onto itself and denote it by πgrch-(X,τ). Theorem :3.23 The set πgrch-(X,τ) is a group under composition of mappings. Proof :
  • 7. On Πgr - Homeomorphisms In… www.ijmsi.org 17 | P a g e We know that the composition of two πgrch(X,τ) is again a πgrch(X,τ).ie, For all f, g  πgrch(X,τ), gf πgrch(X, τ).We know that the composition of mappings is associative, the identity map belongs to πgrch(X,τ) acts as an identity element. If f πgrch(X,τ),then f-1  πgrch(X, τ) such that f f-1 = f-1 f = I and so inverse exists for each element of πgrch(X, τ). Hence πgrc- homeomorphism (X, τ) is a group under the composition of mappings. Theorem :3.24 Let f : (X, τ) →(Y, ) be a πgrc- homeomorphism. Then f induces an isomorphism from the group πgrch(X,τ) onto the group πgrch(Y, ). Proof : We define a map,f* : πgrch(X,τ) → πgrch(Y, ) by f*(k) = f k f-1 every k  πgrch(X,τ) Then f* is a bijection and also for all k1, k2  πgrc- homeomorphism (X, τ) f* (k1 k2) = f (k1 k2) f-1 = (fk1 f-1 )  (fk2 f-1 ) = f* (k1) o f* (k2) Hence f* is a homeomorphism and so it is an isomorphism induced by f. Theorem :3.25 πgrc-homeomorphism is an equivalence relation in the collection of all topological spaces. Proof : Reflexivity and symmetry are immediate and transitivity follows from the fact that the composition of πgr- irresolute maps is πgr-irresolute. Proposition :3.26 For any two subsets A and B of (X, τ) [1] If A  B, then πgr- cl (A)  πgr- cl (B) [2] πgr- cl (AB)  πgr- cl (A)  πgr- cl (B) Theorem :3.27 If f : (X, τ) → (Y, ) is a πgrc- homeomorphism and suppose πgr-closed set of X is closed under arbitrary intersections, then πgr-cl(f-1 (B)) = f-1 (πgr- cl(B) for all B  Y. Proof : Since f is a πgrc-homeomorphism, f and f-1 are πgr - irresolute. Since f is π-irresolute, πgr - cl (f(B)) is a πgr - closed set in (Y, ), f-1 [πgr-cl (f(B)] is πgr - closed in (X, τ). Now, f-1 (B)  f-1 (πgr - cl f(B)) and πgr - cl (f-1 (B))  f-1 (πgr - cl(B))  Again, since f is a πgrc- homeomorphism, f-1 is πgr -irresolute. Since πgr - cl (f-1 (B)) is πgr - closed in X, (f-1 )-1 [πgr - cl (f-1 (B))]= f (πgr - cl (f-1 (B)) is πgr - closed in Y. Now, B  (f-1 )-1 (f-1 (B))  (f-1 )-1 (πgr - cl (f-1 (B)) = f (πgr - cl (f-1 (B)) So, πgr - cl (B)  f (πgr - cl (f-1 (B))  f-1 (πgr -cl(B))  πgr - cl (f-1 (B))  From  & , the equality πgr-cl(f-1 (B)) = f-1 (πgr- cl(B) holds and hence the proof. Corollary :3.28 If f : X → Y is a πgrc-homeomorphism, then πgr - cl (f(B)) =f(πgr - cl (B)) for all B  X. Proof : Since f : X → Y is a πgrc- homeomorphism, f-1 : Y→ X is a πgrc- homeomorphism. By previous theorem, πgr - cl ((f-1 )-1 (B)) = (f-1 )-1 (πgr -cl(B)) for all B  X πgr -cl (f(B)) = f(πgr -cl(B))
  • 8. On Πgr - Homeomorphisms In… www.ijmsi.org 18 | P a g e Corollary :3.29 If f : X →Y is a πgrc - homeomorphism, then f(πgr - int (B)) = πgr -int(f(B)) for all B  X Proof : For any set B  X, πgr -int (B) = [πgr - cl(BC )]C By previous corollary, we obtain f (πgr -int (B)) = f [πgr - cl(BC )C ] = [f (πgr - cl(BC )]C = [πgr -cl(f(BC )]C = [πgr - cl(f(BC )]C = πgr - int(f(B)) Corollary :3.30 If f : X → Y is a πgrc- homeomorphism, then f-1 (πgr -int (B)) = πgr -int(f-1 (B)) for all B  Y Proof : If f-1 : Y → X is also a πgrc - homeomorphism, the proof follows by using corollary 3.29. REFERENCES [1] I.Arokiarani, “Studies on generalizations of generalized closed sets and maps in topological spaces, Ph.D, Thesis, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore(1997). [2] D.A.Carnahan,”Some properties related to compactness in topological spaces ”, Ph.D. Thesis ,Univ.of Arkansas(1973). [3] R.Devi, K.Balachandran H.Maki, “Semi generalized homoeomorphism and generalized semi-homeomorphism in topological spaces, 26(1995),no .3,271-284. [4] Dontchev.J, Noiri.T, “Quasi normal spaces and πg-closed sets”, Acta Math. Hungar , 89 (3), 2000,211-219. [5] R. C. Jain, The role of regularly open sets in general topology, Ph. D. thesis, Meerut University, Institute of Advanced Studies, Meerut, India 1980. [6] C.Janaki and V.Jeyanthi,“On gr-separation axioms”, IJMER,Vol 4, (4), April -2014,7-13. [7] V.Jeyanthi and C.Janaki, “gr-closed sets in topological spaces “,Asian Journal of current Engg. And Maths 1:5 , sep 2012, 241- 246. [8] V.Jeyanthi. and Janaki ,” On πgr-continuous functions in topological spaces ”, IJERA , Vol 1, issue 3, Jan-Feb-2013. [9] N. Levine, Generalized closed sets in topology, Rend. Cir. Mat. Palermo, 19(1970), 89- 96. [10] N.Levine, Semi-open sets and semi-continuity in topological spaces, Amer. Math. Monthly 70(1963), 36-41. [11] P.E.Long and L.L.Herington, Basic properties of regular closed functions , Rend, Cir. Mat. Palermo, 27(1978),20-28. [12] H.Maki,P.Sundaram, K.Balachandran, On Generalized homeomorphisms in topological spaces, Bull. Fukuoka Univ.Ed.Part- III,40(1991),13-21. [13] S.R.Malghan, Generalized closed maps, J.Karnatk Univ. Eci., 27(1982), 82-88. [14] N.Nagaveni, Studies on generalizations of homeomorphisms in topological spaces, Ph.D, Thesis, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore (1999). [15] T.Noiri,”Mildly normal space and some functions”, Kyungpook Math .J.36(1996)183- 190. [16] N.Palaniappan and K.C.Rao,”Regular generalized closed sets ” , Kyungpook Math .J. 33(1993), 211-219. [17] M.K.Singal and A.R. Mathur, Anote on mildly compact spaces, Kyungpook. Math.J.9(1979),165-168. [18] V.Zaitsav, On certain classes of topological spaces and their bicompactifications, Dokl Akad Nauk , SSSR (178), 778-779.