The "Seal the Deal" dream of Copenhagen has been sabotaged by a carefully planned move by the fossil fuel lobby and the Kyoto defaulters to scrap Kyoto proposal and introduce the infinitely more complex emission cap regime. As the struggle for stopping climate change intensifies and the struggling carbon economy lies exposed, it is time to bring in the main players of renewable energy solar energy, wind power and rainforest plantations to the forefront to ensure DIRECT FINANCE & TECHNOLOGY DEALS , the positive solutions in climate change.

1. COP 15 The Deal sabotage “ Coal & Oil lobby throws in the spanners ” at Copenhagen Climate Change : Positive Solutions Series CE 82: “Sabotaging Kyoto & Climate pacts ” !!!

3. What Kyoto achieved GHG Emissions of G7 rise from 2000-2007 says UNFCC http://bit.ly/5DoKX Carbon emissions of G7 rise 3 % despite carbon cap.

5. Carbon prices remain low U.S. Carbon auction price less than $ 4 / unit at RGGI auctions in 2008 CERA estimates of carbon prices of $ 60 / unit to reduce emissions by 22% by 2030 remains illusive. Europe’s Carbon price artificially pegged by stopping the issue of EU Carbon allowances in 2008 http://bit.ly/4kzzIz

8. The Emission leaders U.S. has 25 times per capita emission as India, 8 times that of Brazil and China and twice of France and Britain as per Norwegian Institute of Science and Technologies “Carbon footprint calculator” Australian emission doubles over last 20 years with second highest per capita emission among the G7 behind the U.S.

12. Most Americans & Australians are fighting for a sustainable planet But still the lobbies prevail….Why ? Because the lobbies grasp technicalities thoroughly For the lobbies hire professionals to execute plans Because the lobbies control the bureaucracy effectively Because the lobbies manage the media well Because the lobbies fund the politicians liberally THE LOBBIES EXERT TO CONTROL A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY

19. CCS is expensive & not proven CCS is expensive, complex and not proven and tested commercially despite being in circulation for 20 yrs. Norway’s Sleipner 12 MW unit has been the only CCS power plant running since 10 yrs a pilot plant that has consumed more than it has delivered.

20. Look what you will pay for CCS ! As per World Energy Council the cost of a CCS Power Generation Project is $ 100 / tonne of Carbon easily over 20 times the global average of today’s Carbon auction prices http://tinyurl.com/y8uvb5u

22. Renewable energy is a step child. But G8 countries are not keen to fund Solar Energy or Wind Power projects directly. These must wait for funds from the Cap and Trade Carbon Credits

23. CCS has the Oil & Coal lobby support CCS is a expensive spin off technology from the oil industry and a fig leaf for dirty coal, trying to hijack the clean energy platform. Exxon Mobil runs the world’s biggest carbon-capture facility, at La Barge, Wyoming. America boasts a network of 5,800km (3,600 miles) of pipes to carry carbon dioxide from such facilities to the oil- and gasfields where it is needed.

24. Leaders bow to the lobbies . Why is CCS the favored child of our politicians ? Because CCS, erroneously called Clean Coal, is supported by the Oil & Coal lobby. Its promotion and campaign is well funded and supported and hence CCS is the blue eyed boy. This was to appease the oil and coal lobby that politicians will do their bit to keep coal based plants running, even if it meant diverting resources from clean energy projects.

32. The carbon infrastructure A huge carbon capping and trading infrastructure is then set in motion over the decade to show that leaders are serious about stop polluting industries, and thousands of people are employed doing some of the worlds most unproductive exercise to stop climate change . Not surprisingly this leaves out the main players of renewable energy and sustainability like solar energy, wind energy and rainforests.

33. They increase complexities & costs They cleverly start using layers of needless technology and indirect route maps to avoid reaching clean energy goals by choosing ingenious and devious methods. For if the Carbon route is exposed and found ineffective they will try and thrust a more complex emissions or GHG route which would include half a dozen more gasses and complexities that will take decades to unveil. For only high cost technology can maintain exclusivity that is needed to cover the truth of climate change under a haze of emission crap.

34. Controlling the Carbon Economy The Carbon economy is innovative but theoretical. The boundary limits for such economies are complex and expensive to monitor and manage as ground level manipulations are impossible to detect or monitor by enforcing authorities without operational knowhow. The Carbon economy and the free disbursement of emission allowances will create carbon balloons i.e. super-profits out of grant of free emission allowances http://tinyurl.com/yh2zgd9 to a chosen few among the fossil fuel driven industry.

35. How EU struggles with Cap & Trade EU struggles with the EUA as Carbon prices plunge in 2008 due to oversupply of free emission allowances in 2007 issued by EU Governments Power firms enjoy their own multi-billion pound bonus in previous years by raising power prices to consumers as if they'd had to buy their pollution permits when in fact they'd be given plenty of permits free of charge says BBC News Research http://tinyurl.com/yh2zgd9 The lobby members enjoying the fruits of carbon balloon at the consumers expense.

36. EU Cap & Trade has new headaches Spain, France, Portugal curb emissions while Finland, Britain and Poland show rising trends. Poland & Estonia win European Court of Justice ruling against EC and the right to distribute its free emission allowances to its domestic power sector. Ref: BBC news http://tinyurl.com/yjq4ckq Several phony projects , carbon leakage and corruption deals erupt across Europe to corner the several billion dollar emission allowances and free handouts and tax free permits given by the political powers to industries. 6 arrested in GBP 38 million carbon fraud in Britain. Ref: Telegraph http://tinyurl.com/oujh2j

39. Why Australia & U.S. are a team. Because the Coal lobby decides the Australian policy on climate change and not its people & the Oil lobby the American policy. Because the Coal lobby knows that the Carbon game is up. Cap & Trade is exposed as instrument of great complexity but little use.

41. Why climate change talks fail Cheap Clean Energy is not a priority for the West They have energy They want carbon profits http://bit.ly/4kzzIz

45. The lobbies threaten climate change talks ? Who caused the global focus to shift from clean energy to cap & trade ? Who wants to drop Kyoto pact and now waste time with a new toy called emissions control ? Who has the least interest in developing cheap clean energy technologies ? Who has the money to make politicians talk for them? THE OIL & THE COAL LOBBIES WHO FUND POLITICS

48. Negative solutions can never deliver . Capping Carbon or Capping Emissions are negative economic solutions that only tells you What not to do ?

49. Carbon Cap or Emission Cap Both are based on theoretical computations and influenced by hundreds of factors beyond control and monitoring that spread over the entire planet . The experience of the past 15 years has shown that the capping exercise is expensive and inefficient. Ref: COP 15: Gassing 15 yrs on Carbon Economy http://bit.ly/4kzzIz

52. THE METHOD DIRECT FUNDING OF CLEAN ENERGY PROJECTS EXTENSIVE USE OF GLOBAL AGENCIES FOR FUNDING BOTH GRANT BASED & SOFT LOAN BASED PROJECTS CAPPING UNDER KYOTO MUST BE THE GUIDELINES AND PROPORTIONAL CURBS SHOULD APPLY TO ALL DEVELOPING NATIONS AUTOMATICALLY ONCE THEY CROSS THE BENCHMARK OF PER CAPITA SUSTAINABLE EMISSION FIGURES & GET ADMITTED AUTOMATICALLY IN GROUP OF 37 INDUSTRIALISED NATIONS.

53. THE POST KYOTO PLAN THE POST KYOTO PLAN MUST HAVE CLEAN ENERGY TARGETS WITH TECHNOLOGY AND FINANCE PLANS. NOT VAGUE COMMITMENTS .

54. THE POST KYOTO PLAN THE POST KYOTO PLAN MUST HAVE DEFINABLE POSITIVE SOLUTIONS, IN DEVLOPING CHEAP SOLAR ENERGY PROJECTS WIND ENERGY PROJECTS RAINFOREST PLANTATION PROJECTS

56. THE POST KYOTO PLAN THE POST KYOTO PLAN MUST BE DRAWN UP BY PRACTICAL ENERGY SPECIALISTS WHO HAVE WORKED WITH ENERGY INSTALATIONS AND NOT ACADEMICS WITHOUT PLANT AND INDUSTRY KNOWHOW .

58. Others to follow in the climate change positive plan “clean energy” series CE 21…… onwards “Solutions in solar energy” CE 41……. onwards “Solutions in rainforest plantation” CE 61…….onwards “Solutions in wind energy” CE 81…….onwards “The perils of carbon trade” CE91……. onwards “ Cost reductions and positive solutions for clean energy and climate change initiatives to make it a profit plan.”

59. Our references & acknowledgements Ecology to Economics Our goal is to help promote clean, safe and better practices in economy and ecology worldwide. Balanced, efficient and a little more sustainable. Read more in : Amazon Kindle Blog : Ecothrust http://bit.ly/7XwAG Kyoto agreement & Data UNFCCC & COP Data Norwegian Institute Of Science Report CERA & Carbon Point on Carbon Economy US Clean Energy & Securities Act & GAO Report Our Previous presentation CE-01 Our Previous presentation CE-81 Telegraph U.K. and BBC News & other websites

60. Other Presentations by User Climate Change Positive Solutions Series CE-01 http://www.slideshare.net/SandipSen/cop15bullshitting-15-years-on-climate-change Climate Change Positive Solutions Series CE-01 http://www.slideshare.net/SandipSen/cop15bullshitting-15-years-on-climate-change http://tinyurl.com/luzxss Climate Change Positive Solutions Series CE-81 http://www.slideshare.net/SandipSen/climate-change-positive-solutions-ce-81 http://bit.ly/4kzzIz

61. Other presentations by user Business Risk management Series http://www.slideshare.net/SandipSen/living-dangerously-managing-risks-in-business-ba01ppt Business Risk Case Studies Ba31 http://www.slideshare.net/SandipSen/business-risk-case-study-ba31

62. Other Presentations by User Business Risk Case Study – Ba 33 http://www.slideshare.net/SandipSen/business-risk-case-study-ba33 Business Risk Case Studies Ba32 http://www.slideshare.net/SandipSen/business-risk-case-study-ba-32-1751378