1. Britvic's operating cash flow before working capital investments was £130.7 million in 2011, indicating steady cash generation from core operations.
2. However, Britvic used cash of £37.7 million for capital expenditures and £11.9 million for intangible assets, reducing its free cash flow available for debt repayment and equity.
3. Britvic paid £40.3 million in dividends in 2011, exceeding its free cash flow available for equity of £30.9 million, indicating it relied on external financing to fund dividend payments.
The global outsourcing industry is constantly evolving through new contracting award characteristics and an expanding universe of successful service providers. ISG's TPI Index helps industry participants, enterprises and organizations keep pace and capitalize from the latest data on outsourcing trends. It is the authoritative source for marketplace intelligence related to outsourcing: transaction structures and terms, industry adoption, geographic prevalence and service provider metrics.
Every company, regardless of size or technical acumen, has an opportunity to increase the sophistication with which it makes use of its own data.
By starting with existing management reports, companies can start down the path of moving from simple reporting to the generation of actionable, data-driven insights.
The global outsourcing industry is constantly evolving through new contracting award characteristics and an expanding universe of successful service providers. ISG's TPI Index helps industry participants, enterprises and organizations keep pace and capitalize from the latest data on outsourcing trends. It is the authoritative source for marketplace intelligence related to outsourcing: transaction structures and terms, industry adoption, geographic prevalence and service provider metrics.
Every company, regardless of size or technical acumen, has an opportunity to increase the sophistication with which it makes use of its own data.
By starting with existing management reports, companies can start down the path of moving from simple reporting to the generation of actionable, data-driven insights.
12Walt Disney Company Financial Ratios Calculation 201ChantellPantoja184
1
2
Walt Disney Company Financial Ratios Calculation 2019
Walt Disney Company Financial Ratios Calculation 2020
Walt Disney Company Financial Ratios Comparison
DuPont Analysis
In the context of the study of economic and financial performance, a very useful tool in the specialized literature and practice is the DuPont model. The analysis by the DuPont model is realized through the decomposition rate of return ROE (Return on Equity) according to other rates of return, such as ROS (Return on Sales), ROA (Return on Assets) or Equity Multiplier.
Decomposition of Net Profit Margin
Two-component Disaggregation of ROA
Four-component Disaggregation of ROA
Two-component Disaggregation of ROE
ROE = ROA * Financial Leverage
Year
ROE
ROA
Financial Leverage
2020
-3.43%
-1.42%
2.41
2019
12.44%
5.70%
2.18
Three-component Disaggregation of ROE
2019
2020
Debt Ratio
0.46(Stronger)
0.51(Weaker)
Gross Profit margin
39.6%(Stronger)
32.9%(Weaker)
Free cash flow
1.6%(Stronger)
1.5%(Weaker)
Times interest earned
12.19(Less risk)
-0.06(More risk)
Accounts receivable turnover
4.49(Slower)
5.15(Quicker)
Inventory turnover
9.4(Quicker)
8.8(Slower)
Return on Sales
15.89%(Stronger)
-4.38%(Weaker)
Asset Turnover
0.36(Quicker)
0.32(Slower)
Return on Assets
5.7%(Stronger)
-1.42%(Weaker)
Financial Leverage
2.18(Less Risk)
2.41(More risk)
Return on Equity
12.4%(Stronger)
-3.4%(Weaker)
This paper discusses the trends within the financial performance of Walt Disney, supported the 2 financial years, 2019 and 2020 discussing different aspects of the firm that include
liquidity, efficiency, profitability and solvency.
Profitability
The return on sales of Walt Disney deteriorated in 2020 because it was at -4.38% compared to 15.89% that was achieved in 2019. this might be attributed to numerous issues chief among them increased administration costs and increased.
The ratio of Walt Disney deteriorated in 2020. The profit margin shows the power of the corporate to hold the prices related to the sales low. The return on assets of the firm deteriorated from 5.7% in 2019 to -1.42% in 2020. The return on assets indicates the management’s ability to form sales using total assets. The deterioration of the ROA ratio indicates that there is downswing in efficiency of assets.
Lastly, the Return on Equity also deteriorated because it reduced from 12.4% to -3.4%. The
return on equity indicated the use of shareholders equity in creating income. The breakdown of ROE into its three components, financial leverage, margin of profit, and asset turnover show us the productive aspects of the Walt Disney. The return on assets indicates the management’s ability to form sales using total assets. While there was a rise in financial leverage and asset turnover in 2020, there was a decrease within the margin of profit, which decreased the overall ROE. The profitability of Walt Disney, considering the profit ratios, is deteriorating, with key factor being the decreas ...
12Walt Disney Company Financial Ratios Calculation 201CicelyBourqueju
1
2
Walt Disney Company Financial Ratios Calculation 2019
Walt Disney Company Financial Ratios Calculation 2020
Walt Disney Company Financial Ratios Comparison
DuPont Analysis
In the context of the study of economic and financial performance, a very useful tool in the specialized literature and practice is the DuPont model. The analysis by the DuPont model is realized through the decomposition rate of return ROE (Return on Equity) according to other rates of return, such as ROS (Return on Sales), ROA (Return on Assets) or Equity Multiplier.
Decomposition of Net Profit Margin
Two-component Disaggregation of ROA
Four-component Disaggregation of ROA
Two-component Disaggregation of ROE
ROE = ROA * Financial Leverage
Year
ROE
ROA
Financial Leverage
2020
-3.43%
-1.42%
2.41
2019
12.44%
5.70%
2.18
Three-component Disaggregation of ROE
2019
2020
Debt Ratio
0.46(Stronger)
0.51(Weaker)
Gross Profit margin
39.6%(Stronger)
32.9%(Weaker)
Free cash flow
1.6%(Stronger)
1.5%(Weaker)
Times interest earned
12.19(Less risk)
-0.06(More risk)
Accounts receivable turnover
4.49(Slower)
5.15(Quicker)
Inventory turnover
9.4(Quicker)
8.8(Slower)
Return on Sales
15.89%(Stronger)
-4.38%(Weaker)
Asset Turnover
0.36(Quicker)
0.32(Slower)
Return on Assets
5.7%(Stronger)
-1.42%(Weaker)
Financial Leverage
2.18(Less Risk)
2.41(More risk)
Return on Equity
12.4%(Stronger)
-3.4%(Weaker)
This paper discusses the trends within the financial performance of Walt Disney, supported the 2 financial years, 2019 and 2020 discussing different aspects of the firm that include
liquidity, efficiency, profitability and solvency.
Profitability
The return on sales of Walt Disney deteriorated in 2020 because it was at -4.38% compared to 15.89% that was achieved in 2019. this might be attributed to numerous issues chief among them increased administration costs and increased.
The ratio of Walt Disney deteriorated in 2020. The profit margin shows the power of the corporate to hold the prices related to the sales low. The return on assets of the firm deteriorated from 5.7% in 2019 to -1.42% in 2020. The return on assets indicates the management’s ability to form sales using total assets. The deterioration of the ROA ratio indicates that there is downswing in efficiency of assets.
Lastly, the Return on Equity also deteriorated because it reduced from 12.4% to -3.4%. The
return on equity indicated the use of shareholders equity in creating income. The breakdown of ROE into its three components, financial leverage, margin of profit, and asset turnover show us the productive aspects of the Walt Disney. The return on assets indicates the management’s ability to form sales using total assets. While there was a rise in financial leverage and asset turnover in 2020, there was a decrease within the margin of profit, which decreased the overall ROE. The profitability of Walt Disney, considering the profit ratios, is deteriorating, with key factor being the decreas ...
1
CHAPTER 3
Analysis of Financial Statements
2
Topics in Chapter
Ratio analysis
Du Pont system
Effects of improving ratios
Limitations of ratio analysis
Qualitative factors
3
Value = + + +
FCF1
FCF2
FCF∞
(1 + WACC)1
(1 + WACC)∞
(1 + WACC)2
Free cash flow
(FCF)
Market interest rates
Firm’s business risk
Market risk aversion
Firm’s debt/equity mix
Cost of debt
Cost of equity
Weighted average
cost of capital
(WACC)
Net operating
profit after taxes
Required investments
in operating capital
−
=
Determinants of Intrinsic Value:
Using Ratio Analysis
...
For value box in Ch 3 ratios FM13.
4
Overview
Ratios facilitate comparison of:
One company over time
One company versus other companies
Ratios are used by:
Lenders to determine creditworthiness
Stockholders to estimate future cash flows and risk
Managers to identify areas of weakness and strength
5
Income Statement20102011ESales$5,834,400 $7,035,600COGS4,980,000 5,800,000Other expenses720,000 612,960Deprec.116,960 120,000 Tot. op. costs5,816,960 6,532,960 EBIT17,440 502,640Int. expense176,000 80,000 EBT(158,560)422,640Taxes (40%)(63,424)169,056Net income($ 95,136)$ 253,584
6
Balance Sheets: Assets20102011ECash$ 7,282 $ 14,000S-T invest.20,000 71,632AR632,160 878,000Inventories1,287,360 1,716,480 Total CA1,946,802 2,680,112 Net FA939,790 836,840Total assets$2,886,592 $3,516,952
7
Balance Sheets: Liabilities & Equity20102011EAccts. payable$ 324,000 $ 359,800Notes payable720,000 300,000Accruals284,960 380,000 Total CL1,328,960 1,039,800Long-term debt1,000,000 500,000Common stock460,000 1,680,936Ret. earnings97,632 296,216 Total equity557,632 1,977,152Total L&E$2,886,592 $3,516,952
8
Other Data20102011EStock price$6.00$12.17# of shares100,000 250,000EPS-$0.95$1.01DPS$0.11$0.22Book val. per sh.$5.58$7.91Lease payments$40,000$40,000Tax rate0.40.4
9
Liquidity Ratios
Can the company meet its short-term obligations using the resources it currently has on hand?
10
Forecasted Current and Quick Ratios for 2011.
CR10 = = = 2.58.
QR10 =
= = 0.93.
CA
CL
$2,680
$1,040
$2,680 - $1,716
$1,040
CA - Inv.
CL
11
Comments on CR and QR2011E20102009Ind.CR2.581.462.32.7QR0.930.50.81.0
Expected to improve but still below the industry average.
Liquidity position is weak.
12
Asset Management Ratios
How efficiently does the firm use its assets?
How much does the firm have tied up in assets for each dollar of sales?
13
Inventory Turnover Ratio vs. Industry Average
Inv. turnover =
= = 4.10.
Sales
Inventories
$7,036
$1,716
2011E 2010 2009 Ind.
Inv. T. 4.1 4.5 4.8 6.1
14
Comments on Inventory Turnover
Inventory turnover is below industry average.
Firm might have old inventory, or its control might be poor.
No improvement is currently forecasted.
.
3.0 Project 2_ Developing My Brand Identity Kit.pptxtanyjahb
A personal brand exploration presentation summarizes an individual's unique qualities and goals, covering strengths, values, passions, and target audience. It helps individuals understand what makes them stand out, their desired image, and how they aim to achieve it.
Event Report - SAP Sapphire 2024 Orlando - lots of innovation and old challengesHolger Mueller
Holger Mueller of Constellation Research shares his key takeaways from SAP's Sapphire confernece, held in Orlando, June 3rd till 5th 2024, in the Orange Convention Center.
Premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions for Modern BusinessesSynapseIndia
Stay ahead of the curve with our premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions. Our expert developers utilize MongoDB, Express.js, AngularJS, and Node.js to create modern and responsive web applications. Trust us for cutting-edge solutions that drive your business growth and success.
Know more: https://www.synapseindia.com/technology/mean-stack-development-company.html
VAT Registration Outlined In UAE: Benefits and Requirementsuae taxgpt
Vat Registration is a legal obligation for businesses meeting the threshold requirement, helping companies avoid fines and ramifications. Contact now!
https://viralsocialtrends.com/vat-registration-outlined-in-uae/
Cracking the Workplace Discipline Code Main.pptxWorkforce Group
Cultivating and maintaining discipline within teams is a critical differentiator for successful organisations.
Forward-thinking leaders and business managers understand the impact that discipline has on organisational success. A disciplined workforce operates with clarity, focus, and a shared understanding of expectations, ultimately driving better results, optimising productivity, and facilitating seamless collaboration.
Although discipline is not a one-size-fits-all approach, it can help create a work environment that encourages personal growth and accountability rather than solely relying on punitive measures.
In this deck, you will learn the significance of workplace discipline for organisational success. You’ll also learn
• Four (4) workplace discipline methods you should consider
• The best and most practical approach to implementing workplace discipline.
• Three (3) key tips to maintain a disciplined workplace.
[Note: This is a partial preview. To download this presentation, visit:
https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations]
Sustainability has become an increasingly critical topic as the world recognizes the need to protect our planet and its resources for future generations. Sustainability means meeting our current needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet theirs. It involves long-term planning and consideration of the consequences of our actions. The goal is to create strategies that ensure the long-term viability of People, Planet, and Profit.
Leading companies such as Nike, Toyota, and Siemens are prioritizing sustainable innovation in their business models, setting an example for others to follow. In this Sustainability training presentation, you will learn key concepts, principles, and practices of sustainability applicable across industries. This training aims to create awareness and educate employees, senior executives, consultants, and other key stakeholders, including investors, policymakers, and supply chain partners, on the importance and implementation of sustainability.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
1. Develop a comprehensive understanding of the fundamental principles and concepts that form the foundation of sustainability within corporate environments.
2. Explore the sustainability implementation model, focusing on effective measures and reporting strategies to track and communicate sustainability efforts.
3. Identify and define best practices and critical success factors essential for achieving sustainability goals within organizations.
CONTENTS
1. Introduction and Key Concepts of Sustainability
2. Principles and Practices of Sustainability
3. Measures and Reporting in Sustainability
4. Sustainability Implementation & Best Practices
To download the complete presentation, visit: https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations
LA HUG - Video Testimonials with Chynna Morgan - June 2024Lital Barkan
Have you ever heard that user-generated content or video testimonials can take your brand to the next level? We will explore how you can effectively use video testimonials to leverage and boost your sales, content strategy, and increase your CRM data.🤯
We will dig deeper into:
1. How to capture video testimonials that convert from your audience 🎥
2. How to leverage your testimonials to boost your sales 💲
3. How you can capture more CRM data to understand your audience better through video testimonials. 📊
Building Your Employer Brand with Social MediaLuanWise
Presented at The Global HR Summit, 6th June 2024
In this keynote, Luan Wise will provide invaluable insights to elevate your employer brand on social media platforms including LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X (formerly Twitter) and TikTok. You'll learn how compelling content can authentically showcase your company culture, values, and employee experiences to support your talent acquisition and retention objectives. Additionally, you'll understand the power of employee advocacy to amplify reach and engagement – helping to position your organization as an employer of choice in today's competitive talent landscape.
Digital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit and TemplatesAurelien Domont, MBA
This Digital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit was created by ex-McKinsey, Deloitte and BCG Management Consultants, after more than 5,000 hours of work. It is considered the world's best & most comprehensive Digital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit. It includes all the Frameworks, Best Practices & Templates required to successfully undertake the Digital Transformation of your organization and define a robust IT Strategy.
Editable Toolkit to help you reuse our content: 700 Powerpoint slides | 35 Excel sheets | 84 minutes of Video training
This PowerPoint presentation is only a small preview of our Toolkits. For more details, visit www.domontconsulting.com
An introduction to the cryptocurrency investment platform Binance Savings.Any kyc Account
Learn how to use Binance Savings to expand your bitcoin holdings. Discover how to maximize your earnings on one of the most reliable cryptocurrency exchange platforms, as well as how to earn interest on your cryptocurrency holdings and the various savings choices available.
Affordable Stationery Printing Services in Jaipur | Navpack n PrintNavpack & Print
Looking for professional printing services in Jaipur? Navpack n Print offers high-quality and affordable stationery printing for all your business needs. Stand out with custom stationery designs and fast turnaround times. Contact us today for a quote!
Personal Brand Statement:
As an Army veteran dedicated to lifelong learning, I bring a disciplined, strategic mindset to my pursuits. I am constantly expanding my knowledge to innovate and lead effectively. My journey is driven by a commitment to excellence, and to make a meaningful impact in the world.
4. Company’s operation
Second largest company in UK’s soft drink industry.
Current operations comprise Britvic GB, Britvic
Ireland, and Britvic France.
Britvic both manufactures its own brand of drinks
as well as signs bottling deals.
5. Strategy
Critical Success Factors
Differentiation (3 Brand water strategy)
Distinct consumer targeting
High growth segments
Differentiated brand positioning
Licensing / Franchising of Britvic brands
Enable other local companies to use its trademark and ingredients
Produce and sell Pepsi products in GB an Ireland.
Distribution Network
On-the-go distribution
Strong Customer Base
“Big 4” supermarket
6. Strategy
Critical Success Factors Analysis
Differentiation (3 Brand water strategy)
Distinct consumer targeting
High growth segments
Differentiated brand positioning
Licensing / Franchising of Britvic brands
Enable other local companies to use its trademark and ingredients
Produce and sell Pepsi products in GB an Ireland.
Distribution Network
On-the-go distribution
Strong Customer Base
“Big 4” supermarket
7. Strategy
Critical Success Factors Analysis
Differentiation (3 Brand water strategy)
Distinct consumer targeting
High growth segments
Differentiated brand positioning
Licensing / Franchising of Britvic brands
Enable other local companies to use its trademark and ingredients
Produce and sell Pepsi products in GB an Ireland.
Distribution Network
On-the-go distribution
Strong Customer Base
“Big 4” supermarket
8. Strategy
Critical Success Factors Analysis
Differentiation (3 Brand water strategy)
Distinct consumer targeting
High growth segments
Differentiated brand positioning
Licensing / Franchising of Britvic brands
Enable other local companies to use its trademark and ingredients
Produce and sell Pepsi products in GB an Ireland.
Distribution Network
On-the-go distribution
Strong Customer Base
“Big 4” supermarket
9. Strategy
Critical Success Factors Analysis
Differentiation (3 Brand water strategy)
Distinct consumer targeting
High growth segments
Differentiated brand positioning
Licensing / Franchising of Britvic brands
Enable other local companies to use its trademark and ingredients
Produce and sell Pepsi products in GB an Ireland.
Distribution Network
On-the-go distribution
Strong Customer Base
“Big 4” supermarket
11. Step 1: Key accounting policies
Revenue recognition:
Allows for sales related discounts and rebates
Intangible assets and goodwill:
Acquisition method
Goodwill is not amortized
Intangible assets: trademarks; franchises rights, customer lists
and software costs
12. Step 2: Degree of accounting flexibility
Post-retirement benefit:
Assumptions: factors such as discount rate, inflation, pension
plans, salary increase, expected return on scheme assets,
mortality and other demographic assumptions.
The numbers they allocated in the financial
statement did not seem outlandish or vary
greatly from year before
13. Step 3: Evaluation of accounting strategy
Comparing with Nichols (soft drink company)
Similarities: many aspects (revenue recognition)
Differences:
Reasons: Britvic has a lower operation capability
in paying off the debts from suppliers
14. Step 3 (cont.)
Significant change (voluntarily)
The average days of payment:
2008: 36 days; 2009: 49 days (driven by higher
trade payables)
16. Step 4: Quality of disclosure
Dis-aggregation--------The overall items are broken down as its segmental
reporting that is organized into five reportable units through its geographic
areas, which are GB stills- United Kingdom excluding Northern Ireland, GB Carbs-
United Kingdom excluding Northern Ireland, Ireland, International and France
Good relation with shareholders-------Company gives presentations covering
annual and interim results to analysts, investors and perspective investors.
Business reviews section in annual report discloses the details of company’s
financial performance, the risks it faces and plans for future.
17. Step 5: Potential red flag
Impairment in 2010 is 116.7 million while this figure is merely 4.2 million in the
previous year. Possible explanations has been disclosed in the company’s annual
report which states that Ireland business segment encountered a sustained
economic downturn which cause 89.6 million impairment losses.
18. Step 6: Accounting Distortion
“Exceptional items” -----which permitted by the accounting rules group many one-off
events that cause losses. So a company can produce two figures regarding earnings per
share (EPS); the basic EPS figure which includes these losses and an "adjusted" EPS which
doesn't
Britvic did this in its 2010 accounts; a statutory loss of 21.4p per share became an
adjusted profit of 39.8p when the exceptional losses were ignored.
20. Overview
Five categories of ratio: (FY 2008-2011, Britvic Vs. Nichols)
1. Profitability
2. Liquidity
3. Gearing/Leverage
4. Working capital management
5. Investment activities
21. Profitability
ROE is a comprehensive indicator of a firm’s performance. But it cannot be
used to assess Britvic’s performance, because it disinvested one of its
subsidiaries which leads to a huge retained loss in 2006, making the total
shareholders’ equity be negative, and remains negative in following years.
ROA becomes the best choice.
Overall, Nichols performs better than Britvic, and shows quicker recovery
than Britvic.
ROA comparison
25.00%
20.00%
21.46% 20.62%
19.46%
15.00%
10.00% ROA(Britvic)
5.00% 8.08% ROA(Nichols)
5.48% 5.48%
0.00% 4.30%
FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
-5.00%
-4.61%
-10.00%
22. Profitability
Gross profit margin decreases: perform badly in cost control.
Operating expense ratio: very high compared with Nichols
can explain why Britvic has a lower NPM even if its GPM is higher than Nichols.
For future operation, Britvic plc. should pay attention to cost control and
improve efficiency.
Profitability ratios
60.00% 54.01% 53.93% 55.07%
51.39%
50.00% 45.55% 44.76% 42.72%
36.69% Nichols: FY 2011
40.00%
gross profit margin Gross profit margin: 46.74%
30.00%
operating expense ratio Operating expense ratio: 28.39%
20.00%
net profit margin Net profit margin: 13.47%
10.00% 3.43% 4.78% 4.53%
0.00% -4.23%
FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
-10.00%
23. Liquidity
Two ratios are both improved.
Current ratio: (1) increase;
(2) value of ratio is still less than 1 (the ability of repayment).
Quick ratio (assess a company’s ability to meet CL based on higher liquid assets):
(1) use CA to repay CL more quickly than previous years.
Nichols plc. still shows more efficiency in utilizing liquid assets to meet
current obligations.
Liquidity ratios
1.20
1.00 0.99
1.00 0.90
0.81 0.77 0.76
0.80
0.63
0.72
Nichols: FY 2011
0.60 current ratio Current ratio: 2.14
0.40 quick ratio
Quick ratio: 1.88
0.20
0.00
FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
24. Gearing/Leverage
D/E ratio computation is meaningless (negative total SH’s
equity).
But negative total SH’s equity indicates TA is less than TL,
reflecting high risk of liquidation.
Interest coverage: although PBIT can cover interest payment,
compared with Nichols, less safe.
Britvic Britvic Britvic Britvic Nichols
FY 2011 FY 2010 FY 2009 FY 2008 FY 2011
Interest coverage 3.50 3.81 2.90 156.46
25. Working capital management
Days’ inventory increases: limit the ability to manage inventory efficiently.
Days’ receivable increases: having problems in credit terms and collecting
cash from customers.
Days’ payable increases then decreases: a free source of borrowing (due to
negative total SH equity), negative impact on company’s credit rating.
Nichols shows more efficient working capital management.
Working capital management
250.00
228.48
216.90 209.03
200.00
191.67
Nichols: FY 2011
150.00
Days' inventory Days’ inventory: 31.90
100.00 Days' receivable Days’ receivable: 69.88
Days' payable Days’ payable: 118.60
61.64 65.06 67.60
50.00 55.86 48.51 50.07
40.56 41.41
0.00
FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
26. Investment ratios
P/E ratio: a measure of future earnings growth.
Huge loss in Irish market in 2010 had an impact of SH’s expectation of Britvic.
Dividend cover: a measure of security.
Reduce dividend is a bad signal.
Nichols in 2011 shows higher future earnings growth and safe
dividend coverage than Britvic.
Britvic Britvic Britvic Britvic Nichols
FY 2011 FY 2010 FY 2009 FY 2008 FY 2011
P/E ratio 13.01 16.32 14.53 14.46
Dividend cover 1.45 1.68 1.29 2.57
28. Cash flow statement Britvic Britvic Britvic Britvic Nichols
2011 2010 2009 2008 2011
Net Income 79.9 (28.8) 66.2 51.8 11.759
Long-term Income tax paid (20.9) (21.8) (18.9) (8.1) (3.068)
operating Financial costs 32 26.3 23.6 26.6 (0.072)
Accruals Other financial instruments 10.2 1.5 - - -
Impairment of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets 0.5 116.7 4.2 4.2 4.8
Depreciation and amortization 48.5 42.4 38.7 42.6 0.17
Shared-based payments 3.8 7.8 6.9 7.8 -
Net pension charge less contribution (27.9) (16) (13.4) (12.4) (0.748)
Loss on disposal of tangible and intangible assets 4.6 1.3 1.7 3.0 -
Tax expense recognized in the IS - - - - 4.225
Change in provisions - - - - (0.179)
Operating cash flow before working capital investments 130.7 129.4 109 116.1 12.087
(Increase)/decrease in inventory (4.4) 1.3 (1.0) (2.0) (2.302)
(Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables (24.1) 10.4 (18.9) (15.3) (4.652)
Increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables 22.8 (16.6) 41.8 44.4 7.05
Operating cash flow before investment in long-term assets 125.0 124.5 130.9 143.2 12.183
Net (investments Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment 0.6 4.7 9.5 6.1 -
in) or Purchases of property, plant and equipment (37.7) (40.2) (38.3) (45.3) (0.154)
Liquidation of Purchases of intangible assets (11.9) (9.8) (11.9) (5.9) -
operating long-
Acquisition of subsidiary net of cash acquired (4.5) (151.9) - (6.8) (2.3)
term assets and
equipment
Interest received - - - 0.3 -
Finance income - - - - 0.072
Free cash flow available to debt and equity 71.5 (72.7) 90.2 91.6 9.801
After tax net interest income (expense) (31.1) (24.9) (25.2) (26.9) -
Net debt (repayment) or issuance (9.5) 54.8 (7.3) (45.5) -
Free cash flow available to equity 30.9 (42.8) 57.7 19.2 9.801
Dividend (payments) (40.3) (34.9) (27.8) (24.7) (5.195)
Net stock issuance (repurchase) and other equity changes (1.0) 92.5 (3.3) (8.1) 0.083
Net increase (decrease) in cash balance (10.4) 14.8 26.6 (13.6) 4.689
Exchange rate differences (0.6) (0.5) 0.2 0.8 -
Net increase (decrease) in cash balance- As Reported (11.0) 14.3 26.8 (14.4) 4.689
29. Cash Flow Analysis
Operating cash flow before working capital investments
① Depreciation and amortization and financial costs
② Pension charges
③ Outstanding impairment shown in 2010
Operating cash flow before investment in long-term assets
① Constant increase in receivables
② Constant decrease in payables
③ Inverse situation witnessed in 2010
30. Continued Cash Flow Analysis
Operating cash flow before investment in long-term assets
① Constant growth or expansion
② Acquisition of Britvic France was realized in 2010
Free cash flow available to debt and equity
① Constant debt and dividend payments
② In 2010, Britvic issued new debt and new stock to pay back the debt
and to raise fund.
33. Accounting Quality
Red Flags
The ratio of sales and receivables
The ratio of inventories
The ratio of Operating Activities
Recommendation
Paying more attentions to its overall operations to explain these
dramatic and abnormal changes
34. Financial Health
Less Competitive
Lower liquidity
Lower profitability
Higher leverage
Recommendations
Maintaining a certain current ratio in order to ensure adequate liquidity.
Cost control and efficiency performance should be the priority of the
further development.
35. Forecasting
The successive growth of 7% in Sales and 10.8% in Gross profit in
2012
The historical sales trend Business Strategy
An average annual growth rate New-product introducing
of 6.6% Expanding market share
36. Forecasting
The successive growth of Net Revenue on an average of 1.8%
in 2012
The historical sales trend The Conpany situation
An average annual growth rate Mature market
of 1.8% Increasing sales and gross profits