Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill: A Study of Behavioural Decision MakingJerome Dauvergne
This report analyses the genesis of the Deepwater Horizon disaster from a behavioural decision making perspective. In order to write this original paper I borrowed from the investigative work of the environmental journalist Abrahm Lustgarten, and from concepts developed by behavioural finance and emotional finance academics such as the Canadian Hersh Shefrin, the American John Nofsinger, and the Britons Richard Taffler and David Tuckett.
I hope you'll enjoy the read!
British Petroleum [Case Study : Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill]Navitha Pereira
The presentation talks about various aspects of British Petroleum. It highlights the company's corporate crimes and violations against human rights. It then focuses on the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill.
BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill's impact on the us economy, Jonah Guo,Queen's MBAJonah Guo
This presentation is prepared in the Macro-economy class to analyze the macro economic affect of the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill. All the photos are found via Google search, copyright belong to the original authors. Logos came from the GreenPeace Logo contest
Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill: A Study of Behavioural Decision MakingJerome Dauvergne
This report analyses the genesis of the Deepwater Horizon disaster from a behavioural decision making perspective. In order to write this original paper I borrowed from the investigative work of the environmental journalist Abrahm Lustgarten, and from concepts developed by behavioural finance and emotional finance academics such as the Canadian Hersh Shefrin, the American John Nofsinger, and the Britons Richard Taffler and David Tuckett.
I hope you'll enjoy the read!
British Petroleum [Case Study : Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill]Navitha Pereira
The presentation talks about various aspects of British Petroleum. It highlights the company's corporate crimes and violations against human rights. It then focuses on the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill.
BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill's impact on the us economy, Jonah Guo,Queen's MBAJonah Guo
This presentation is prepared in the Macro-economy class to analyze the macro economic affect of the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill. All the photos are found via Google search, copyright belong to the original authors. Logos came from the GreenPeace Logo contest
As a team, we had to provide a PowerPoint presentation with audio narration that includes the following:
A summary of the problems facing Luis Morales as he began implementing Ben Fisher's international expansion strategy.
A summary of the organizational changes he made in response to those problems.
A summary of the true value of the Sterling Partners consulting services that they provided.
An overview of what Morales should recommend.
A call to action regarding what Ben Fisher should decide.
Bhopal Gas Tragedy - 1984. The presentation is about the disasters happened in Bhopal on 2nd and 3rd December in 1984, in which more than 4,000 were dead instantly and 5,00,000 were affected. It also shows the procrastination of the company and negligence of the Factory workers, which caused this tragic incident.
the Army Crew case study is answering tree questions:
1. Why does the Varsity (V) team lose to the JV Team? (critically analyze and be specific)
2. What should Coach P do on Tuesday? Why do you recommend this action? How should he implement this action? Be specific.
3. How would you compare the Army Crew team to other types of organizational teams? What are the similarities and differences?
BP Oil Spill and if the BP Oil Spill had happened in India and Comparative study between India and States with respect to Oil SpillBP Oil Spill .What if the BP Oil Spill had happened in India and Comparative study between India and States with respect to Oil Spill.
Cola Wars - Coke Vs Pepsi Harvard Business School Case StudyMohan Kanni
A brief presentation on case study Cola Wars where we try to analyse the past history and predict the future of their business and growth opportunities from a Marketing Management Perspective.
As a team, we had to provide a PowerPoint presentation with audio narration that includes the following:
A summary of the problems facing Luis Morales as he began implementing Ben Fisher's international expansion strategy.
A summary of the organizational changes he made in response to those problems.
A summary of the true value of the Sterling Partners consulting services that they provided.
An overview of what Morales should recommend.
A call to action regarding what Ben Fisher should decide.
Bhopal Gas Tragedy - 1984. The presentation is about the disasters happened in Bhopal on 2nd and 3rd December in 1984, in which more than 4,000 were dead instantly and 5,00,000 were affected. It also shows the procrastination of the company and negligence of the Factory workers, which caused this tragic incident.
the Army Crew case study is answering tree questions:
1. Why does the Varsity (V) team lose to the JV Team? (critically analyze and be specific)
2. What should Coach P do on Tuesday? Why do you recommend this action? How should he implement this action? Be specific.
3. How would you compare the Army Crew team to other types of organizational teams? What are the similarities and differences?
BP Oil Spill and if the BP Oil Spill had happened in India and Comparative study between India and States with respect to Oil SpillBP Oil Spill .What if the BP Oil Spill had happened in India and Comparative study between India and States with respect to Oil Spill.
Cola Wars - Coke Vs Pepsi Harvard Business School Case StudyMohan Kanni
A brief presentation on case study Cola Wars where we try to analyse the past history and predict the future of their business and growth opportunities from a Marketing Management Perspective.
Philippe kunz – global operation – george kastner emba london - dickens cohort, This case try to explain the miss-function and give some theoretical advice
BP Oil Spill: Why Social Media and Engaging with Publics is Integral to Crisi...Andy Sternberg
Slides and links to video I used for a guest lecture at the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism's JOUR 568: Critical Thinking and Crisis Management
Case Study 9Running head BP & THE GULF OF MEXICO OIL SPILLC.docxmoggdede
Case Study 9
Running head: BP & THE GULF OF MEXICO OIL SPILL
Case Study: BP & The Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill
Central Michigan University
Organizational Dynamics & Human Behavior – MSA 601
Abstract
This paper will focus on the monumental disaster and ensuing public relations nightmare of British Petroleum (BP). This disaster of course was brought about by the oil rig explosion and fire in the Gulf of Mexico. BP is a multinational conglomerate of gargantuan proportions. They have molded and perfected their public image over decades. This paper will take a look at the lapses in BP’s management and public relations efforts and what measures the company should have taken.
BP & the Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill
The reason that the authors selected to evaluate British Petroleum (BP) for a case study was due in no small part to the endless media attention given to the oil spill in the Gulf. BP is an extremely popular brand that everyone in this country undoubtedly is effected by in one way or another. One of the initial reasons for choosing BP was the unmitigated disaster put forth on the public relations front in explaining the company’s efforts at dealing with the Gulf of Mexico oil crisis. The authors were further intrigued at this assignment for the poor leadership and decision making acumen of the former CEO Tony Hayward (CMU, 2009, p. 227). With this multi-focal approach, the study will highlight the conflicting messaging presented to the public and the lackluster and ultimately ineffective leadership within the organization.
BP is a huge multinational conglomerate whose primary focus is the petroleum industry. The company does business in over 30 countries around the globe. Its annual operating income is $239 billion dollars with over $14 billion dollars in profit in the year 2009. The company employs over 80,300 individuals and owns 16 refineries worldwide. BP operates several subsidiaries under the names AM/PM markets, BP and ARCO gas stations, Aral gas stations in Germany, Wild Bean Café, and Castrol Motor Oil (BP at a glance, 2010).
The competition within the petroleum industry is not as plentiful as one might think. There are actually very few players in the game. Due to the limited number of refiners of crude in this country the oil from various sources are blended prior to coming to the consumer. BP doesn’t have much use for the service station business anymore. In 2007, it announced plans to sell the last 700 stations that it hadn’t already sold to franchisees. The company chose to focus on finding and collecting oil. Once companies make a discovery, it comes out of the ground and ends up at a refinery. There, it can be mixed with oil that a variety of companies have poured into the tanks. This is further evidenced by BP’s plans to divest itself of its remaining 700 gas service stations. The highest percentage of income is made from oil exploration and extraction and not in the selling of gasoline at its stations (Lieber, 2010).
BP.
Please Do Not Copy and Paste anything from this report, this is ju.docxrandymartin91030
Please Do Not Copy and Paste anything from this report, this is just history of the case
BP: Example of an Unethical Trifecta
Posted on September 17, 2013 by mensah_henry
From the dawn of time, human beings have relied on the environment to provide with the all the things we need to survive and be successful. It has also helped us develop civilizations and founded industries where there was none. Our exploitation of our environment is part of what makes us successful. The more we have been able to conquer and manipulate our environment, the more we have developed culturally, socially, and economically (Kareiva and Marvier, 2012). The three tenets of culture, society, and economy has been our biggest source of influence in dealing with the environment. Ever since the discovery of oil by the ancient civilizations of Babylonia and Greece, great importance has been placed on our ability to utilize it and the products we get from it (Totten, 2007). Today, the oil industry has grown from nothing to become one of the world’s biggest and most important. British Petroleum (BP) is one of the largest oil companies in the world and a major stakeholder in the United States oil industry.
Although BP has been operating in the United States for a long time, its history and operations have not always been worthy of praise. The company has been in the middle of several issues and held accountable for several incidents that have resulted in the loss of life, property, and massive environmental damage. The United States government has always placed a premium on the environment and its safety and Americans in general are conscious about the environment and what needs to be done to protect it.
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the BP Pipeline case (Case 6.25 on pp. 411-422) and to address the following topics:
• Discuss in detail the ethical, negligence, and environmental issues you see in this case.
• BP had rented the rig from Transocean for $500,000 per day. Transocean had been recognized by the U.S. government for its safety record. Can companies distance themselves from liability and responsibility through the use of contractors?
• Discuss how BP got into the position in which it found itself in late 2006 and what might have prevented the spill, the financial fallout, and the loss of reputation. Be sure to factor in the financial implications of any decision made during the period from 2001 to 2006.
• What was the impact of the emphasis in cost cutting on BP’s culture? What was the influence on the company’s performance?
• Evaluate the social responsibility positions of BP in light of the refinery explosion and the pipeline issue. What can companies learn from the BP experience?
British Petroleum has a large operation in the United States and it has made investments to ensure that it develops these operations to maximize its production and increase profits. One such investment was the acquisition of the vast oil field at Prudhoe Bay, .
Watch the following video and respond to the questions belowhtt.docxmelbruce90096
Watch the following video and respond to the questions below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImQrUjlyHUg
(1) What is your opinion of Mark Pagel's explanation of language and humanity? (i.e., do you think his explanation of the evolution of language adequately addresses how humans have been impacted by the ability to communicate).
(2) How do you think "social learning" has influenced humanity? (think of the good and bad).
(3) Are there any additional thoughts that came to mind as you were watching this video?
Don’t Look Back in Anger at Bailouts and Stimulus
By Alan S. Blinder And Mark Zandi
The Wall Street Journal
Oct. 15, 2015 6:32 p.m. ET
Former Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke in an Oct. 6 interview on the Fox Business Network. PHOTO:
RICHARD DREW/ASSOCIATED PRESS
Without the emergency measures of 2008-09, the U.S.
economy would be far worse off today.
The publicity surrounding former Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke’s memoir prompts a
look-back at the stunning array of policy responses promulgated by the Fed, Congress and two
administrations to avert catastrophe during the financial crisis in 2008-09. This is important
because many of these initiatives haven’t aged well in the eyes of politicians and the public.
TARP, fiscal stimulus, quantitative easing and auto bailout remain dirty words to many people
who increasingly blame them for prolonging the Great Recession and the slow pace of recovery.
But in a study released Thursday for the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, we found the
reverse to be true: These extraordinary policies ended the crisis and jump-started an economic
recovery that is stronger in the U.S. than in most countries.
Specifically, we estimate that:
• The peak-to-trough decline in real gross domestic product, which was barely more than 4%,
would have been close to a stunning 14%.
• The contraction would have lasted three years, more than twice as long as it did.
Don’t Look Back in Anger at Bailouts and Stimulus
By Alan S. Blinder And Mark Zandi
The Wall Street Journal
Oct. 15, 2015 6:32 p.m. ET
• More than 17 million jobs would have been lost, about twice the actual number.
• Unemployment would have peaked at just under 16%, rather than at 10%.
• The federal budget deficit would have ballooned to $2.8 trillion, equal to 18% of GDP,
compared with its actual peak of 10%.
• Today’s economy would be far weaker than it is—with real GDP about $800 billion lower, 3.6
million fewer jobs, and unemployment still at 7.6%.
The overwhelming nature of the fiscal and monetary policy responses is the main reason we
didn’t suffer a much-worse fate. Yet history is in danger of giving the powerful 2008-09
responses a misguided Bronx cheer.
Start with TARP. The Troubled Asset Relief Program was deeply unpopular in part because it
was so large—a $700 billion bailout fund—and aimed primarily at “Wall Street.” It felt wrong to
bail out guilty parties, and many.
THE FINANCIAL IMPACTS OF BP’S RESPONSE TO THE DEEPWATER HORI.docxcherry686017
THE FINANCIAL IMPACTS OF BP’S RESPONSE TO THE
DEEPWATER HORIZON OIL SPILL
COMPARING DAMAGE VALUATION APPROACHES & HIGHLIGHTING THE NEED
FOR MORE RELIABLE ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING
JOËL HOUDET & CHARLES GERMANEAU
SYNERGIZ
www.synergiz.fr
[email protected]
THE DEEPWATER HORIZON OIL SPILL :
THE KEY POINTS
he Deepwater Horizon oil spill, also known as the
Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill or the BP Oil Spill, is the
largest marine oil spill in US history. It was caused by an
explosion on the Deepwater Horizon offshore oil platform
about 50 miles southeast of the Mississippi River delta on
April 20, 2010. After a series of failed efforts to plug the
leak, BP said on July 15 that it had capped the well, stop-
ping the flow of oil into the Gulf of Mexico for the first
time in 86 days. Though the rate of oil release rapidly be-
came the subject of intense debate, the current consensus
is that roughly five million barrels of oil were released by
the Macondo well, with about 4.2 million barrels pouring
into the waters of the Gulf of Mexico (Cleveland 2010).
Estimates of the extent of the surface oil slick vary widely
(derived from data on wind / ocean current forecasts, aerial
photography and satellite imagery): for instance, Skytruth1
has estimated the total oil-slick footprint at 68,000 square
miles.
BP was the principal developer of the Macondo Prospect
oil field where the accident occurred. The Deepwater Ho-
rizon, owned by Transocean Ltd., was under a contract
with BP to drill an exploratory well. At the time of the
explosion, BP and Transocean were in the process of clo-
sing the well in anticipation of later production, while
Halliburton had recently completed cementing of casings
in the well. The U.S. Government named BP as the res-
ponsible party in the incident and will apparently hold the
company accountable for all cleanup costs resulting from
the oil spill. Though BP has accepted responsibility for it
as well as the ensuing cleanup costs, it has recently in-
dicated that Transocean and Halliburton both deserved
considerable blame for the disaster (Cleveland 2010).
THE FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS OF BP’S
RESPONSE TO DEEPWATER HORIZON OIL SPILL
n February 1 2011, BP released its group income sta-
tement for the fourth quarter of 2010. It reflects a pre-
tax charge of US$40.9 billion related to the Deepwater
Horizon oil spill, which includes US$17.7 billion of costs
effectively incurred for 20102. All charges relating to the
incident have been treated as non-operating items and were
deduced from taxable income. This includes a US$20-
billion escrow account BP has agreed to establish over the
next 3.5 years by the sale of US assets. The escrow account
will be available to satisfy legitimate claims adjudicated
by the independent Gulf Coast Claims Facility (GCCF),
final judgments in litigation and litigation settlements, sta-
te and local response costs, and costs related to natural re-
source dama ...
The BP and Toyota cases concern companies that acted in ways that wo.docxanhcrowley
The BP and Toyota cases concern companies that acted in ways that would clearly cause harm to the public and/or the planet. To do so, individuals at many levels played a part. If you worked in the marketing department of BP or Toyota, explain your department’s responsibility related to these issues. You must use the text and at least one additional scholarly source.
Guided Response:
Review several of your peers’ posts. Respond to at least two of your peers and provide recommendations to extend their thinking. Challenge your peers by asking a question that may cause them to reevaluate their explanations. Provide examples that support your peers’ explanations or that provide a different perspective.
Respond
This section lists options that can be used to view responses.
Expand All
Collapse All
Print View
Show Options
Hide Options
View Selected
View All
Responses
Responses are listed below in the following order: response, author and the date and time the response is posted.
[removed]
Sort by
Response
Sort by
Author
Sort by
Date/Time*
[removed] [removed] [removed]
[removed]
week 5 discussion 1
Trudie Harris
12/3/2015 7:55:22 PM
For this discussion, I will take the role of an individual in Toyota’s marketing department. In all my years of lean manufacturing, Toyota has been the gold standard. When I heard about the gas pedal defect, I was in awe. Some have argued that the issue was caused by Toyota’s aggressive growth. They argue that their rapid growth has caused a drastic decline in quality. In 2005, Toyota recalled more vehicles than they produced (Connor, 2010). Perhaps, they got too big too fast.
Ultimately, there was a breakdown in the quality system and the supply chain. As part of the Toyota marketing team, my responsibility, in lieu of the recall, would be to instill confidence back in to the consumer. First, and foremost, I would need to ensure that an explanation is given to the public and to inform the public as to all steps necessary to prevent any reoccurrences. Unfortunately, in today’s world, many parts in the automotive industry are subcontracted to the lowest bidder. As a marketer, I would look at possible vertical integration of components or a more robust supply chain and quality system. It took Toyota decades to build their pristine reputation, but only a short time for them to lose it. It was not the gas pedal that was the problem, it was much more systemic.
The statistics following statistics are disappointing. One study shows that 57% of business college students and adults felt the way the Toyota leadership team handled the recall was disappointing or very poor. Only 18%, had confidence in Toyota at the time of the recall. However, only 13% felt that Toyota would not regain its prominence (Piotrowski, 2010). With these statistics, I would look at developing protocols on how to handle crisis situations.
Mistakes will happen. It is important that the leadership is prepared to handle these mistak.
Digital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit and TemplatesAurelien Domont, MBA
This Digital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit was created by ex-McKinsey, Deloitte and BCG Management Consultants, after more than 5,000 hours of work. It is considered the world's best & most comprehensive Digital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit. It includes all the Frameworks, Best Practices & Templates required to successfully undertake the Digital Transformation of your organization and define a robust IT Strategy.
Editable Toolkit to help you reuse our content: 700 Powerpoint slides | 35 Excel sheets | 84 minutes of Video training
This PowerPoint presentation is only a small preview of our Toolkits. For more details, visit www.domontconsulting.com
RMD24 | Retail media: hoe zet je dit in als je geen AH of Unilever bent? Heid...BBPMedia1
Grote partijen zijn al een tijdje onderweg met retail media. Ondertussen worden in dit domein ook de kansen zichtbaar voor andere spelers in de markt. Maar met die kansen ontstaan ook vragen: Zelf retail media worden of erop adverteren? In welke fase van de funnel past het en hoe integreer je het in een mediaplan? Wat is nu precies het verschil met marketplaces en Programmatic ads? In dit half uur beslechten we de dilemma's en krijg je antwoorden op wanneer het voor jou tijd is om de volgende stap te zetten.
Falcon stands out as a top-tier P2P Invoice Discounting platform in India, bridging esteemed blue-chip companies and eager investors. Our goal is to transform the investment landscape in India by establishing a comprehensive destination for borrowers and investors with diverse profiles and needs, all while minimizing risk. What sets Falcon apart is the elimination of intermediaries such as commercial banks and depository institutions, allowing investors to enjoy higher yields.
Personal Brand Statement:
As an Army veteran dedicated to lifelong learning, I bring a disciplined, strategic mindset to my pursuits. I am constantly expanding my knowledge to innovate and lead effectively. My journey is driven by a commitment to excellence, and to make a meaningful impact in the world.
Company Valuation webinar series - Tuesday, 4 June 2024FelixPerez547899
This session provided an update as to the latest valuation data in the UK and then delved into a discussion on the upcoming election and the impacts on valuation. We finished, as always with a Q&A
3.0 Project 2_ Developing My Brand Identity Kit.pptxtanyjahb
A personal brand exploration presentation summarizes an individual's unique qualities and goals, covering strengths, values, passions, and target audience. It helps individuals understand what makes them stand out, their desired image, and how they aim to achieve it.
Buy Verified PayPal Account | Buy Google 5 Star Reviewsusawebmarket
Buy Verified PayPal Account
Looking to buy verified PayPal accounts? Discover 7 expert tips for safely purchasing a verified PayPal account in 2024. Ensure security and reliability for your transactions.
PayPal Services Features-
🟢 Email Access
🟢 Bank Added
🟢 Card Verified
🟢 Full SSN Provided
🟢 Phone Number Access
🟢 Driving License Copy
🟢 Fasted Delivery
Client Satisfaction is Our First priority. Our services is very appropriate to buy. We assume that the first-rate way to purchase our offerings is to order on the website. If you have any worry in our cooperation usually You can order us on Skype or Telegram.
24/7 Hours Reply/Please Contact
usawebmarketEmail: support@usawebmarket.com
Skype: usawebmarket
Telegram: @usawebmarket
WhatsApp: +1(218) 203-5951
USA WEB MARKET is the Best Verified PayPal, Payoneer, Cash App, Skrill, Neteller, Stripe Account and SEO, SMM Service provider.100%Satisfection granted.100% replacement Granted.
Recruiting in the Digital Age: A Social Media MasterclassLuanWise
In this masterclass, presented at the Global HR Summit on 5th June 2024, Luan Wise explored the essential features of social media platforms that support talent acquisition, including LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X (formerly Twitter) and TikTok.
Cracking the Workplace Discipline Code Main.pptxWorkforce Group
Cultivating and maintaining discipline within teams is a critical differentiator for successful organisations.
Forward-thinking leaders and business managers understand the impact that discipline has on organisational success. A disciplined workforce operates with clarity, focus, and a shared understanding of expectations, ultimately driving better results, optimising productivity, and facilitating seamless collaboration.
Although discipline is not a one-size-fits-all approach, it can help create a work environment that encourages personal growth and accountability rather than solely relying on punitive measures.
In this deck, you will learn the significance of workplace discipline for organisational success. You’ll also learn
• Four (4) workplace discipline methods you should consider
• The best and most practical approach to implementing workplace discipline.
• Three (3) key tips to maintain a disciplined workplace.
Kseniya Leshchenko: Shared development support service model as the way to ma...Lviv Startup Club
Kseniya Leshchenko: Shared development support service model as the way to make small projects with small budgets profitable for the company (UA)
Kyiv PMDay 2024 Summer
Website – www.pmday.org
Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/startuplviv
FB – https://www.facebook.com/pmdayconference
The world of search engine optimization (SEO) is buzzing with discussions after Google confirmed that around 2,500 leaked internal documents related to its Search feature are indeed authentic. The revelation has sparked significant concerns within the SEO community. The leaked documents were initially reported by SEO experts Rand Fishkin and Mike King, igniting widespread analysis and discourse. For More Info:- https://news.arihantwebtech.com/search-disrupted-googles-leaked-documents-rock-the-seo-world/
Putting the SPARK into Virtual Training.pptxCynthia Clay
This 60-minute webinar, sponsored by Adobe, was delivered for the Training Mag Network. It explored the five elements of SPARK: Storytelling, Purpose, Action, Relationships, and Kudos. Knowing how to tell a well-structured story is key to building long-term memory. Stating a clear purpose that doesn't take away from the discovery learning process is critical. Ensuring that people move from theory to practical application is imperative. Creating strong social learning is the key to commitment and engagement. Validating and affirming participants' comments is the way to create a positive learning environment.
Premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions for Modern BusinessesSynapseIndia
Stay ahead of the curve with our premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions. Our expert developers utilize MongoDB, Express.js, AngularJS, and Node.js to create modern and responsive web applications. Trust us for cutting-edge solutions that drive your business growth and success.
Know more: https://www.synapseindia.com/technology/mean-stack-development-company.html
Enterprise Excellence is Inclusive Excellence.pdfKaiNexus
Enterprise excellence and inclusive excellence are closely linked, and real-world challenges have shown that both are essential to the success of any organization. To achieve enterprise excellence, organizations must focus on improving their operations and processes while creating an inclusive environment that engages everyone. In this interactive session, the facilitator will highlight commonly established business practices and how they limit our ability to engage everyone every day. More importantly, though, participants will likely gain increased awareness of what we can do differently to maximize enterprise excellence through deliberate inclusion.
What is Enterprise Excellence?
Enterprise Excellence is a holistic approach that's aimed at achieving world-class performance across all aspects of the organization.
What might I learn?
A way to engage all in creating Inclusive Excellence. Lessons from the US military and their parallels to the story of Harry Potter. How belt systems and CI teams can destroy inclusive practices. How leadership language invites people to the party. There are three things leaders can do to engage everyone every day: maximizing psychological safety to create environments where folks learn, contribute, and challenge the status quo.
Who might benefit? Anyone and everyone leading folks from the shop floor to top floor.
Dr. William Harvey is a seasoned Operations Leader with extensive experience in chemical processing, manufacturing, and operations management. At Michelman, he currently oversees multiple sites, leading teams in strategic planning and coaching/practicing continuous improvement. William is set to start his eighth year of teaching at the University of Cincinnati where he teaches marketing, finance, and management. William holds various certifications in change management, quality, leadership, operational excellence, team building, and DiSC, among others.
So, who’s to blame for this disaster? The truth is that all these people and organizations are responsible for it, including those that we aren’t aware of i.e. all BP shareholders. Tony Hayward was framed for the spill and was mocked and condemned hypocritically by his competitors and by the media. What about BP’s corporate culture and the influence people like Peter Sutherland (Global Policy Journal)or John Browne had on the company’s activities? By the way, Tony Hayward actually improved the company’s safety record during the last 2 years prior to the oil spill (Mouawad 2010). John Browne the former CEO of BP initiated the controversial ‘cost-cutting scheme’ that most probably compromised health & safety and led to major accidents such as The Texas City Refinery Explosion in 2005, killing 15 people and injuring 100 more (Bower 2010). He’s been accused that his cost-cutting plan led to the Deepwater Horizon disaster as well (Bower 2010). We can be critical of Barack Obama’s lack of urgency at the beginning of the spill, pointing the blame towards BP but not towards himself and his administration, too. So how did these 3 giants- BP, Halliburton and Transocean get a permission for the Gulf of Mexico drilling?
First of all attempts to rescue environment could improve his personal reputation. This reason is connected with Obama’s previous attempts to set up new offshore drilling in the US, which had to stop immediately after explosion of oil rig. Solved situation will also look better in his next election campaign. But the most important reason is that the BP as a well-known multinational company that is one of the biggest energy producing companies in the world is able to afford to pay enormous amount of money to rebuild theirs reputation.
As Buchanan and Huczynski (2004, p. 828) say: ‘These are broad and vague concepts that have proved difficult to define or to measure, with precision and without ambiguity’. Power is a relational property describing the extent to which a given actor can control the behaviour of another actor by manipulating rewards important to the other. It follows from this view that the statement that an individual is powerful is meaningful only as shorthand for saying that the individual is powerful relative to certain others, so CEO power means the power that the CEO has over other members of the organization. Power is essential for producing strategic change because decisions to alter organizational strategies and structures affect internal actors with vested interests, and implementation likewise involves mobilization and deployment of resources controlled by multiple managers (Pfeffer and Salancik, 1978). Buchanan, D. and Huczynski, A. (2004). Organizational behaviour: An introductory text 5 th ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall. Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power: Politics and influence in organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Pfeffer, J. and Salancik,G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
How did this disaster happen in the first place? Minerals Management Service , the American Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement regulates offshore oil and gas production and collects reports on spill as small as a single barrel. MMS was so confident of the system that in fact exempted BP from filling an environmental impact statement for the Macondo operation (it technically allowed the oil industry to obey them on a voluntary basis). MMS collects about $10 billion in royalties annually and is one of the government’s largest sources of revenue other than tax (Savage 2008). During the George Bush administration days, this agency was found to be ‘dysfunctional, riddled with conflicts of interest and unprofessional behaviour’ (Savage 2008). Lucy Dennett, the then associated director of minerals revenue management was found to steer a lucrative consulting contract, violating competitive procurement rules. In September 2009, the Interior Department shut down an oil royalty program run by the agency after audits found that MMS was undercollecting millions of dollars worth of royalties (Coy & Reed 2010). By the way, BP was one of the three finalists for the agency’s annual awards for offshore producers. The ceremony which was scheduled for 3 rd May 2010 was postponed. Dick Cheney was a CEO of HALLIBURTON between 1995-2000 (Hoffman & Jennings 2011 p.5) and is still associated with the company. TRANSOCEAN , just like BP has a history of accidents: A Scotsman was killed aboard a drilling rig in North Sea in 2002 (BBC News 2002); in 2007 the Bourbon Dolphin supply boat sank off the coast of Scotland killing 8 people (Offshore shipping 2008); in 2008 2 people were killed on Transocean vessels (Smith & Casselman 2010) and the DEEPWATER HORIZON DRILLING RIG EXPLOSION IN 2010.
The Interior Departments – Mineral Management Service BP PLC and other big oil companies based their plans for responding to a big oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico on U.S. government projections that gave very low odds of oil hitting shore, even in the case of a spill much larger than the current one, however, government models, which oil companies are required to use have not been updated since 2004, the models assumed that most of the oil would rapidly evaporate or get broken up by waves or weather. In the weeks since the Deepwater Horizon caught fire and sank, real life has proven these models, prepared by the Interior Department's Mineral Management Service, wrong. BP – Under heavy fire from congress and environmental groups BP has come under heavy fire from Congress and environmental groups for its lack of readiness to handle a worst-case spill. But that criticism has overlooked a key fact: BP was required by federal regulators to base its preparations on Interior Department models that were last updated in 2004 and they have not been tested sufficiently for water that is very deep. In 2001, the then-head of the MMS environmental division wrote a paper that warned "the oil spill trajectory models currently used by the oil industry for the preparation of oil spill response plans may not be adequate for deep water." – then you have to wonder why BP were allowed to drill as this was the deepest oil well in history at a vertical depth of 35,050 ft– this is the largest drilled well in history, because of this there is a high possibility this is one of the reasons the government and BP were not prepared to stop the spill as it was at a depth where an accident has never occurred before and the governments Interior department failed to update their models.
Researchers have spent the past decade trying to improve modelling of oil spills. The biggest challenge: to update the models to reflect the new reality of deep-water oil drilling. Spills thousands of feet below the surface behave very differently than spills on the surface. Underwater currents, for example, can grab plumes of oil and transport them far from the scene of the initial spill, scientists say. One thing to think about is that if the government did update their models and give an accurate forecast and BP were able to tackle the problem faster would the environmental damage have been a lot less? Would the oil have reached the shores of the 4 states affected by this disaster in this map? – Even though BP takes the main responsibility of the spill, should they be paying for the full cost of the environmental damage when the government has provided bad statistical data to help them tackle the crisis? Or should the government have some responsibility to fund towards this environmental disaster?
The government were not prepared The great fear of every political leader is events, especially unexpected ones, and especially unexpected ones that are beyond the power of politicians to control. This event has no precedent: a British company drilling a mile beneath the surface of the Gulf of Mexico punctures the earth’s skin, unleashing a plume of oil that nobody seems able to stop. Although responsibility for the accident plainly lies with BP, a slick of recrimination now laps around the White House too. Governments have not readied themselves to plug holes on the ocean floor. But what if an oil companies’ engineers cannot undo their mistake? Mustn’t the government step in? – Yes admits Obama. He continued “I take responsibility. It is my job to make sure that everything is done to shut this thing down.” But mark the date on his remarks (May 27 th ) the blowout at the Deepwater Horizon rig took place more than a month earlier, on April 20 th . It is not just his political critics and media foes who say that the president’s forthcoming acceptance of responsibility has arrived woefully late. Colin Powell, Mr bush’s former secretary of state and former chairman of joint chiefs of staff, implied that Mr Obama’s reaction has been sluggish. When dealing with “something like this” that had gone beyond the capacity of the private sector or local authorities to solve, Mr Powell said, “I think the federal government has to move in quickly and move in with … decisive force.” Of Mr Obama’s claim to have been on top of things from the start, Mr Powell said: “That impression was not conveyed to the American people”. Government officials need to think carefully before taking actions Government officials need to react with more heartfelt sincerity, show human emotions and to be more careful what they say to the media as it can have many negative effects. Barack Obama supported the idea of suspending the quarterly dividends for shareholders – this has provoked anger among many business people and pensioners in the UK, many of whose pension funds have investments in the oil giant.” – This was clearly not a good thing to say, as it has angered a lot of the stakeholders affected by this crisis. "You attack the dividend and you are attacking millions of British pensioners," said Tom Watson, a member of the opposition Labour Party
Make sure that statistical oil spill data models from the Minerals Management Service used are up to data and accurate After this crisis we can clearly see the government were not prepared for the environmental consequences of a spill at levels this deep, oil companies should never be given the permission to drill in deep waters which have not been properly analysed by statistical data and been thoroughly checked by government departments so they know exactly what to do if another crisis is to happen. Show more consideration to the stakeholders involved in the crisis Barack Obama seemed to forget that there were many people such as business people, pensioners etc. that have had money in the oil giant after agreeing that the quarterly dividend should be suspended angering many people, the government officials need to be properly advised and check every stakeholder who can be possibly involved after a crisis happens and by doing this it ensures a much higher chance that no similar problems can happen again in the future. – The government should know all stakeholders involved before and after a disaster happens, by doing this they will be more prepared for any similar future disasters and should have a better idea how to respond. Make sure that oil companies drilling have oil containment equipment ready Owen Kratz, chief executive officer of Helix Energy Solutions, one of the company's working to contain the spill for BP, said that the industry needs to have more oil containment equipment positioned to handle a blowout – instead of building containment systems after an accident. – I agree but I believe the U.S government should be taking action to make sure the oil companies have adequate oil containment equipment in preparation of a spill before allowing them to drill as these waters that are being drilled in don’t belong to the oil companies, and the U.S government are overall responsible for the wellbeing of their states and their residents. If another spill happens and the oil company cant fix it, the government must step in to take action.
Unlike what happened with Exxon Valdez the oil giant British Petroleum has suffered an avalanche of news media, since the platform Deepwater Horizon exploded April 20. The TV news channels, radio and newspapers joined the bloggers, social media groups using Twitter and Facebook to criticize BP, for what is being widely considered as its inadequate response to the environmental crisis. "As a company, the first thing you have to understand is the amount of conversations in the online world, Companies aren't talking enough to hear what people are saying about them … and when something is related to the environment, health or safety, it is something that will not be secret for long.
Zaleznik relates the perception of whether the actions are perceived are ‘political’ or self-interest depend on the resources possessed by individual. Others might act in the same manner, but believe that it is in the best interest for the organisation. Drory and Romm (1988) argued that those in the managerial positions are less likely to those in non-managerial positions to recognise their actions as political. It can be related to BP and their internal situation; CEO Tony Hayward might have perceived his action as non-political whereas workers from the platform and engineers probably recognised the political influence the situation caused. It is also related to micro versus macro ‘picture’ of the disaster. Variation between positions in the company and individuals can also be looked from power (possession of position and/or resources) point of view. According to Pfeffer (1992) power can stream from three sources: control over information, formal authority to act and control over resources. It is important to have awareness of each group’s interest, to be able for the organisation to work towards same objectives. As Mintzberg (1983) argues, if too many individuals pursue their own personal agenda (...) it can turn the whole organisation into political cauldron and divert it from its main task. (not just within BP, worth mentioning are the fisherman who fight each for their own and against one another to protect themselves and survive). BP’s first public statement, in which the blame for the accident was put towards Transocean, was an example of avoiding responsibility without consideration of influence it can have on future relationship with stakeholders.
When analysing BP’s stakeholders we can consider those who are recognised and thought of if the drill went as planned and no accidents happen. However the process was not successful so that the list of parties involved and influences increased. Apart from BP and the firms who cooperated in the drilling process many other (unconsidered prior the incident) got harmed. The situation had a great impact on the community of Gulf of Mexico (fishers, everyday residents who lost not only money but the heritage which will not be replaced).
BP was "already defining what would pay before had an idea of what they were dealing with.“ In addition, the CEO, Mr Hayward was not in the location of the disaster until a few days after the sinking, which led the understanding that the CEO of BP was off and complaints of people who live and work along the Gulf Coast. "Companies often fail to not think as consumers" during a crisis situation, meaning that companies only focus on what is at risk for them, more than those affected by crises. "BP seemed somewhat arrogantly in conducting this situation and not gets any support from the Government of the United States. Moreover, it seems essential to examine the importance of the communication in politics as well as different interest or groups might have when it comes to dealing with such problem.
According to businessinsurance article several PR professionals were asked what went wrong with BP's plan, including BCM President Jonathan Bernstein, who had this to say: “BP is crisis planning on the fly,” When trouble rears its ugly head, it quickly becomes clear whether an organization has prepared a crisis management plan or not. In BP's case, failing to plan for a tragic but predictable crisis has caused damage to its reputation and the environment that the company will be battling for years to come. The reputation is essential to organizations as well as individuals and BP’s reputation underwent considerable damages.
BP has proclaimed the importance of safety for its vast worldwide operations. Yet despite the improvement in injury and spill rates during that decade, BP has caused a number of disastrous or potentially disastrous workplace incidents that suggest its approach to managing safety has been on individual worker occupational safety but not on process safety. These incidents and subsequent analyses indicate that the company does not have consistent and reliable risk-management processes and thus has been unable to meet its professed commitment to safety. BP’s safety lapses have been chronic.
Why was BP allowed to continue its offshore drilling?
In order to provide more insight to what these numbers truly represent, it is helpful to view them in perspective to comparable incidents. It is worthy to note that whereas the Exxon Valdez spill was limited in capacity to the vessel in which it was contained, the Deepwater Horizon well, for obvious reasons, is not. However, the Exxon Valdez accident shares many traits with the BP spill. The company was highly criticized by the government and media for lack of a quick response time and refusal to acknowledge the extent of the problem and this led the public to infer they were not taking the accident seriously. The image of Exxon was irreversibly stained and there was a stigma attached to the brand that is still present today. The one good thing that came from the Valdez oil spill was perhaps the Federal Oil Pollution Act of 1990, the law states that companies must have a "plan to prevent spills that may occur" and have a "detailed containment and clean-up plan" for oil spills. The law also includes a clause that prohibits any vessel in any marine area, from operating in Prince William Sound, and Exxon introduced its Operations Integrity Management System (OIMS) in 1992.
BP’s has been criticised for its safety through the media and US government, but we cannot forget that oil spills happen around the world. In many cases companies deny their involvement or reach a settlement out of court which barely compensates the victims. As an example: Exxon originally denied its guilt in the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska and subsequent successfully appealed a federal court decision for the pay of $2.5 billion in damages. Shell has also not been held accountable for the environmental destruction and political upheaval arising from oil leakages in the Niger Delta. Against this backdrop of corporate inaction within the oil industry, the public must realize that more is being done in the BP case than one would think.
BP realized that accepting responsibility and finding ways to restore order is the best approach. The list of activities BP is carrying out to save its reputation is long and include among other things new markets research, new merges with other companies (like the recent partnership with the Indian Reliance Industries and the Russian Rosneft), the selling of poor managed or unprofitable assets to cover the losses with compensation schemes (refineries, etc.). Other high scorers include restoring better leadership in the company, ensuring that higher quality control protocols are put in place to ensure better safety standards, as well as greater investments in rebuilding communities impacted by the spill and make the most of its rebranding campaign started in 2002 “Beyond Petroleum”. The fact remains that the company has made inroads by admitting responsibility for the spill and has taken the first course of action to not only end the spill but also to investigate the matter further. Until the relief effort is completed, it's natural for the public to want to see BP carrying out more corrective action. This statement has been coupled by the U.S. government's determination to mend the problem and a national commission has been established to probe the cause of the disaster and recommend additional safety and environmental standards.
A range of models have been developed to help business owners prevent and deal with crises. Perhaps the most flexible is the four-phase approach. 1. Managing issues . Business owners can often identify issues that have the potential to cause a crisis. For example, if you rely on your online presence or web services, an extended period of downtime or a data loss could result in a crisis. The first phase involves identifying these issues and, where possible, changing the way you do things in order to find systems that are less vulnerable. 2. Planning and prevention . Having identified relevant issues, you should then consider ways that you can minimise the risk. Where it is not possible to remove the risk altogether, you should plan ahead to ensure you can manage any resulting crisis efficiently. This might involve drawing up plans to minimise business disruption, manage press interest, and reassure your clients or customers. 3. Managing the crisis . In the event of a crisis, the plan you have formulated should be followed carefully. All relevant parties should have been briefed in advance. Remember, though, that circumstances can change and unexpected events can occur. Make sure that you are flexible enough to deal with these events. 4. Post-crisis . Having navigated the crisis, you should make sure that you learn any relevant lessons. What could you have done better? Could the crisis have been prevented? If so, what systems do you need to change?
Lesson 1: Crises expose dysfunctional organizational cultures. With its army of media advisers and PR professionals, BP made the mistake of trying to spin its way out of this crisis rather than tackling it head on. Tony Hayward should have realized — or been advised — that there are some crises that cannot be spun. Instead, he has done untold damage to BP's reputation with his gaffes and apparent inability to understand public reaction to his comments. He appears weak, petty, defensive and lacking a grip on the situation he has been moved aside to make way for Chairman Carl-Henric Svanberg. Lesson 2: Leaders must recognize when a crisis can't be spun. While Hayward is rightly being held to account, what can be said about the other leaders' roles in the crisis? In my view, Barack Obama has not lived up to his early promise as a reflective and thoughtful leader who can mediate effectively in times of crisis. The President might have intervened earlier (it was 50 days before he met BP's leaders), highlighting the bigger issue of environmental damage and emphasizing the necessity of all sides working together to stem the damage. Instead, he reacted politically, responding to criticisms of his own slow response by deflecting blame unequivocally on BP and unleashing the nation's rage on the company, which at times was extremely ill-judged . As for the other key players, we have heard little from the leaders of Transocean, a company that was clearly no minor player in the disaster since it leased the rig to BP and was responsible for its safety. Lesson 3: Leaders need to work together rather than scoring points or deflecting blame. In some ways, a clearer comparison can be drawn between the Gulf of Mexico oil spillage and the banking crisis than with 9/11. In both the oil and banking industries, risk management came a poor second to innovation, profitability and market demand. The duty of leaders, politicians and investors to adhere to regulations was pushed aside in the drive to build successful businesses, create jobs, and deliver shareholder profits. They forgot (or refused to remember) that true leaders are stewards of their organizations and must lead for the longer term. If BP goes out of business as a result of the Deepwater Horizon crisis, then its leaders have failed on a monumental scale. Similarly, if U.S. politicians are shown to have put party or national concerns before matters of global importance such as the environment, they will ultimately be failing their nation and people. Lesson 4: Leaders are there to serve their companies, people and communities. While leadership has been visibly lacking at BP and among political leaders during this crisis, there has been no shortage of leadership among community members and volunteers in the region who have mobilized themselves in an effort to mitigate the effects of the spill. As with 9/11, ordinary people have shown remarkable leadership capabilities, volunteering to clean up the oil and help the stricken wildlife, without thought or care for their own health and safety. Unlike the elected leaders, they see the bigger picture and recognize that the environment and the livelihoods of local people are more important than corporate profitability or political maneuverings. If the leaders in this crisis had followed their example, they might have made more progress in dealing with the crisis. The pictures of local people working to clear up the spill should be put before Hayward, Obama, and Jindal every day to remind them that leadership is not vested solely in those at the top of organizations or political parties, and that they should remember they can learn from everyone around them, whatever their position or role. Lesson 5: True leadership exists beyond title and office — elected leaders should remember this. These are just a few thoughts about the situation unfolding in the Gulf of Mexico and some of the parallels that can be drawn for leaders. What are your thoughts? Do you have any constructive suggestions? And if you could send one message to the leaders in this crisis, what would it be? As ever, I look forward to, and appreciate, your views.
Crisis management can seem rather abstract, particularly for smaller businesses. But firms of every size face potential crises every day – so how can you adapt some of the more complex elements of crisis management to help you deal with these problems? • Don’t ignore it. When faced with a crisis, the worst thing you can do is bury your head in the sand. You need to act quickly and decisively, tackling the crisis head-on. • Learn when to ask for help. It may well be that there are elements of a crisis that you simply cannot deal with in-house. Big technological failures, for example, might require you to bring in external professional help. Make sure you can identify when you need another pair of hands. • Manage the media. Many small firms underestimate the importance of media relations. In the worst cases, a crisis can completely destroy your brand – and that it is a crushing blow for a business of any size.