This document provides an overview of key concepts in qualitative research. It begins by noting that qualitative research aims to understand how people experience and understand the social world rather than testing hypotheses. Some key points made include:
- Qualitative research uses various data sources like interviews, observations, documents rather than predefined variables.
- Hypotheses may develop through analysis rather than being predetermined. The analysis process can involve constant comparison and refinement of ideas.
- Findings from qualitative research are not intended to be generalized but rather aim to provide a situated understanding.
- Subjectivity is part of qualitative research but researchers aim for reflexivity to understand how their own views may shape the analysis.
The document discusses various types
Designing the next big thing: Randomness vs Serendipity in DH toolsKimberleyMartin
The document discusses serendipity in digital humanities research tools. It presents findings from interviews with historians and digital humanists about experiencing serendipity through physical and online research methods. Models of serendipity in information encountering are reviewed. The document also examines several digital tools designed to facilitate serendipity, analyzing their abilities to support noticing, stopping, examining, capturing, and returning to found information. Key findings indicate that environments which are trigger-rich and enable connections can lead to unexpected discoveries important for serendipity.
This document outlines key concepts and approaches in naturalistic, qualitative, and ethnographic research. It discusses the foundations and stages of such research, including planning, data collection methods like observation and interviews, analysis involving inductive theory generation, and addressing issues like reflexivity and negotiating entry into research sites. Challenges like reactivity and representing multiple realities are also covered.
Pengantar Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (Qualitative Research-An Introduction)NajMah Usman
Belajar apa itu metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif
Mengenal istilah-istilah Ontologi, Epistomologi, Methodologi, Metode dll
Happy Learning
Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaPugvOnCRQ
Naturalistic research involves observing human behavior and interactions as they occur in natural real-world contexts, without manipulating the phenomenon of interest. It assumes phenomena should be studied in their natural context. Researchers observe and collect qualitative data using techniques like direct observation, interviews, and archival records. They must select research sites and participants purposively and gain access to settings in a role like participant-observer. Validity relies on triangulation while reliability is difficult given the subjective nature of naturalistic research. Findings are typically reported through narrative descriptions, quotes and examples.
Using qualitative methods for gender analysisIFPRI Gender
The document summarizes the use of qualitative methods to study gender issues in program evaluations, using conditional cash transfer programs as an example. It discusses how qualitative research can uncover social dynamics and norms that influence program outcomes and who benefits. It provides examples of gender issues studied, such as how social norms influence participation and outcomes. The document also describes how qualitative research adds value to quantitative research by providing context and explanations. It highlights some findings on gender from evaluations of CCT programs in Latin America and Turkey.
Designing the next big thing: Randomness vs Serendipity in DH toolsKimberleyMartin
The document discusses serendipity in digital humanities research tools. It presents findings from interviews with historians and digital humanists about experiencing serendipity through physical and online research methods. Models of serendipity in information encountering are reviewed. The document also examines several digital tools designed to facilitate serendipity, analyzing their abilities to support noticing, stopping, examining, capturing, and returning to found information. Key findings indicate that environments which are trigger-rich and enable connections can lead to unexpected discoveries important for serendipity.
This document outlines key concepts and approaches in naturalistic, qualitative, and ethnographic research. It discusses the foundations and stages of such research, including planning, data collection methods like observation and interviews, analysis involving inductive theory generation, and addressing issues like reflexivity and negotiating entry into research sites. Challenges like reactivity and representing multiple realities are also covered.
Pengantar Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (Qualitative Research-An Introduction)NajMah Usman
Belajar apa itu metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif
Mengenal istilah-istilah Ontologi, Epistomologi, Methodologi, Metode dll
Happy Learning
Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaPugvOnCRQ
Naturalistic research involves observing human behavior and interactions as they occur in natural real-world contexts, without manipulating the phenomenon of interest. It assumes phenomena should be studied in their natural context. Researchers observe and collect qualitative data using techniques like direct observation, interviews, and archival records. They must select research sites and participants purposively and gain access to settings in a role like participant-observer. Validity relies on triangulation while reliability is difficult given the subjective nature of naturalistic research. Findings are typically reported through narrative descriptions, quotes and examples.
Using qualitative methods for gender analysisIFPRI Gender
The document summarizes the use of qualitative methods to study gender issues in program evaluations, using conditional cash transfer programs as an example. It discusses how qualitative research can uncover social dynamics and norms that influence program outcomes and who benefits. It provides examples of gender issues studied, such as how social norms influence participation and outcomes. The document also describes how qualitative research adds value to quantitative research by providing context and explanations. It highlights some findings on gender from evaluations of CCT programs in Latin America and Turkey.
Researching people: using questionnaires and interviewsJenna Condie
Social research methods lecture for animation masters students @salforduni. Introducing the two dominant social research methods - questionnaires and interviews.
This PowerPoint is about qualitative research design and what are different approaches one can adopt This slides also talks about the importance of health care research and what different approaches one can adopt
1. The document discusses several qualitative research designs including ethnography, phenomenology, grounded theory, historical research, case study, feminist research, and action research.
2. Qualitative research aims to explore phenomena through words rather than numbers to gain an understanding from the participant's perspective.
3. The key types of qualitative research designs discussed are ethnography which studies culture, phenomenology which describes the meaning of lived experiences, and grounded theory which develops theories grounded in data.
This document provides an overview of ethnography as a qualitative research methodology. It defines ethnography as the systematic study of people and cultures from the point of view of the subject. Ethnography involves direct observation and interaction with participants in their natural environment through methods such as interviews and surveys. It requires skills such as interpretative agility, impartiality, and cultural sensitivity. The document outlines the history, key features, advantages, and disadvantages of ethnographic research and provides guidance on its applications and effective conduct.
This document provides an overview of qualitative research. It discusses that qualitative research involves collecting various empirical materials like interviews and observations to understand people's experiences. Qualitative research aims to understand what people think and feel in their natural settings by interpreting phenomena based on people's own meanings. Some common criticisms of qualitative research are that the results cannot be generalized and the researcher's presence may influence the findings. The document also compares qualitative and quantitative research and discusses various qualitative methods, sampling approaches, the iterative process, grounded theory, and phenomenology.
Ethnography is a method used in anthropology and other social sciences to study cultures. It involves immersing oneself in a culture to gain a deep understanding of that culture's practices, values and worldview from the perspective of its members. The researcher spends extensive time observing and participating in the daily lives of the culture being studied. The result is a rich description of that culture that provides insight into how its members live and experience the world. Ethnography has also been applied to study software engineering cultures and practices by observing how teams work and interact to understand their processes and behaviors in context. While some criticize ethnography for being subjective, proponents argue it provides a valuable perspective for understanding cultures that cannot be gained through more detached
Qualitative research focuses on understanding human experiences and behaviors through methods like interviews, observations and document analysis rather than statistical analysis. It seeks to understand phenomena in their natural settings from participants' perspectives. The key approaches to qualitative research include phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography and case studies. Qualitative data is typically in the form of words rather than numbers.
This document discusses qualitative research methods. It begins by defining qualitative research as research that investigates qualities like relationships and behaviors rather than quantities. It provides characteristics of qualitative research such as enabling insight into attitudes and allowing flexible exploration. The document then discusses distinctions between qualitative and quantitative research, forms of qualitative research including observation and case studies, and techniques for qualitative research like asking open-ended why questions and careful listening and observation.
This document provides an overview of qualitative research methods. It discusses what qualitative research is, how to get the right sample, important aspects of qualitative research design such as research questions and comparisons. It also covers organizing a qualitative study, ethics, and designing for different qualitative methods like interviews, focus groups, and ethnography. Key considerations for each method are outlined.
This document discusses research paradigms and provides examples of different types of research paradigms. It begins by defining what a research paradigm is - the underlying beliefs, assumptions, and methodologies that guide research. It then outlines four main research paradigms: positivism/quantitative, interpretivist/qualitative, critical, and pragmatic. For each paradigm, it describes the ontology (view of reality), epistemology (relationship between the researcher and what is being researched), and methodology. It provides examples of research questions and studies for each paradigm. The document discusses the strengths and limitations of different paradigms and whether they meet the needs of practicing educators.
This document discusses research paradigms in online and distance education research. It begins by defining key terms like research paradigm, ontology, epistemology and methodology. It then outlines four main research paradigms: positivism, interpretivism, critical theory, and pragmatism. For each paradigm, it describes the underlying beliefs about the nature of knowledge and reality, as well as typical research questions and methodologies. Examples of studies using different paradigms are also provided. The document concludes by discussing considerations for choosing a research paradigm and what makes a good research question.
This document outlines the plan and topics for discussion for a university course on research question design. It includes exercises for students to develop one sentence research questions and discusses improving existing questions. There is a suggested break, and discussions on hypotheses, qualitative vs quantitative research, and reflections on research questions from examples like Becker and Firth. Practical considerations for research such as feasibility, ethics, and managing the scope of the question are also covered.
This document discusses challenges with traditional qualitative research methods and proposes participatory approaches. It notes that traditional methods often rely on artificial settings and manufactured data, ignoring mundane interactions where social order emerges. Additionally, a focus on single data modes and lack of contextual or non-verbal data in transcripts can be misleading. The document proposes participatory qualitative approaches that focus on naturally occurring situated interactions, center users in the design/investigation, capture multiple realities interactively with participants, and employ methods like user-centered design scenarios, self-documentation, sensory ethnography, and photo elicitation to better understand lived experiences and needs.
Interpretive paradigm presentation by vicky & savithirisykeshea
This document provides an overview of the interpretive research paradigm, including its key assumptions, origins, methods, and evolution. It discusses interpretivism's focus on understanding meaning and interpretation through socially constructed realities. The document outlines interpretivism's ontology of multiple subjective realities and epistemology of dynamic, context-dependent meanings. It also summarizes common interpretive research methods like interviews and observations. Finally, it notes some challenges of interpretive research and criteria for evaluating interpretive studies.
In the Educational research, two approaches are used. Quantitative & qualitative. Qualitative Research is much different than the quantitative. The details of the qualitative research are discussed in this presentation.
This is the lecture I delivered on the 'Becoming Social Scientist' undergraduate module at the University of Birmingham, as the part of a whole module with students. This is the first introductory lecture entitled 'Ethnography I: Introduction'. During the lecture, it was continuous, the effort to link ethnography with Social Innovation and Design Thinking applied research perspective of Ethnography in the broader social and business context of Birmingham.
A short lecture which looks at a range of different approaches to studying Twitter. Aimed at sociologists, this lecture suggest a multi-method and multi-site approach can help researchers get a full picture of what Twitter is and what it means to people.
Finding Gamers in 140 Characters: Talk of Games on TwitterJason Rutter
This document discusses gamers and gaming practices based on analysis of tweets mentioning the video game Portal 2. The tweets show that gamers discuss their gaming experiences, processes, enthusiasm and game resources on Twitter even when not actively playing. They construct gaming as a routine practice that extends beyond just playing the game itself. The analysis finds that for these gamers, digital play is intertwined with other everyday activities and routines rather than being separated from real life.
Researching people: using questionnaires and interviewsJenna Condie
Social research methods lecture for animation masters students @salforduni. Introducing the two dominant social research methods - questionnaires and interviews.
This PowerPoint is about qualitative research design and what are different approaches one can adopt This slides also talks about the importance of health care research and what different approaches one can adopt
1. The document discusses several qualitative research designs including ethnography, phenomenology, grounded theory, historical research, case study, feminist research, and action research.
2. Qualitative research aims to explore phenomena through words rather than numbers to gain an understanding from the participant's perspective.
3. The key types of qualitative research designs discussed are ethnography which studies culture, phenomenology which describes the meaning of lived experiences, and grounded theory which develops theories grounded in data.
This document provides an overview of ethnography as a qualitative research methodology. It defines ethnography as the systematic study of people and cultures from the point of view of the subject. Ethnography involves direct observation and interaction with participants in their natural environment through methods such as interviews and surveys. It requires skills such as interpretative agility, impartiality, and cultural sensitivity. The document outlines the history, key features, advantages, and disadvantages of ethnographic research and provides guidance on its applications and effective conduct.
This document provides an overview of qualitative research. It discusses that qualitative research involves collecting various empirical materials like interviews and observations to understand people's experiences. Qualitative research aims to understand what people think and feel in their natural settings by interpreting phenomena based on people's own meanings. Some common criticisms of qualitative research are that the results cannot be generalized and the researcher's presence may influence the findings. The document also compares qualitative and quantitative research and discusses various qualitative methods, sampling approaches, the iterative process, grounded theory, and phenomenology.
Ethnography is a method used in anthropology and other social sciences to study cultures. It involves immersing oneself in a culture to gain a deep understanding of that culture's practices, values and worldview from the perspective of its members. The researcher spends extensive time observing and participating in the daily lives of the culture being studied. The result is a rich description of that culture that provides insight into how its members live and experience the world. Ethnography has also been applied to study software engineering cultures and practices by observing how teams work and interact to understand their processes and behaviors in context. While some criticize ethnography for being subjective, proponents argue it provides a valuable perspective for understanding cultures that cannot be gained through more detached
Qualitative research focuses on understanding human experiences and behaviors through methods like interviews, observations and document analysis rather than statistical analysis. It seeks to understand phenomena in their natural settings from participants' perspectives. The key approaches to qualitative research include phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography and case studies. Qualitative data is typically in the form of words rather than numbers.
This document discusses qualitative research methods. It begins by defining qualitative research as research that investigates qualities like relationships and behaviors rather than quantities. It provides characteristics of qualitative research such as enabling insight into attitudes and allowing flexible exploration. The document then discusses distinctions between qualitative and quantitative research, forms of qualitative research including observation and case studies, and techniques for qualitative research like asking open-ended why questions and careful listening and observation.
This document provides an overview of qualitative research methods. It discusses what qualitative research is, how to get the right sample, important aspects of qualitative research design such as research questions and comparisons. It also covers organizing a qualitative study, ethics, and designing for different qualitative methods like interviews, focus groups, and ethnography. Key considerations for each method are outlined.
This document discusses research paradigms and provides examples of different types of research paradigms. It begins by defining what a research paradigm is - the underlying beliefs, assumptions, and methodologies that guide research. It then outlines four main research paradigms: positivism/quantitative, interpretivist/qualitative, critical, and pragmatic. For each paradigm, it describes the ontology (view of reality), epistemology (relationship between the researcher and what is being researched), and methodology. It provides examples of research questions and studies for each paradigm. The document discusses the strengths and limitations of different paradigms and whether they meet the needs of practicing educators.
This document discusses research paradigms in online and distance education research. It begins by defining key terms like research paradigm, ontology, epistemology and methodology. It then outlines four main research paradigms: positivism, interpretivism, critical theory, and pragmatism. For each paradigm, it describes the underlying beliefs about the nature of knowledge and reality, as well as typical research questions and methodologies. Examples of studies using different paradigms are also provided. The document concludes by discussing considerations for choosing a research paradigm and what makes a good research question.
This document outlines the plan and topics for discussion for a university course on research question design. It includes exercises for students to develop one sentence research questions and discusses improving existing questions. There is a suggested break, and discussions on hypotheses, qualitative vs quantitative research, and reflections on research questions from examples like Becker and Firth. Practical considerations for research such as feasibility, ethics, and managing the scope of the question are also covered.
This document discusses challenges with traditional qualitative research methods and proposes participatory approaches. It notes that traditional methods often rely on artificial settings and manufactured data, ignoring mundane interactions where social order emerges. Additionally, a focus on single data modes and lack of contextual or non-verbal data in transcripts can be misleading. The document proposes participatory qualitative approaches that focus on naturally occurring situated interactions, center users in the design/investigation, capture multiple realities interactively with participants, and employ methods like user-centered design scenarios, self-documentation, sensory ethnography, and photo elicitation to better understand lived experiences and needs.
Interpretive paradigm presentation by vicky & savithirisykeshea
This document provides an overview of the interpretive research paradigm, including its key assumptions, origins, methods, and evolution. It discusses interpretivism's focus on understanding meaning and interpretation through socially constructed realities. The document outlines interpretivism's ontology of multiple subjective realities and epistemology of dynamic, context-dependent meanings. It also summarizes common interpretive research methods like interviews and observations. Finally, it notes some challenges of interpretive research and criteria for evaluating interpretive studies.
In the Educational research, two approaches are used. Quantitative & qualitative. Qualitative Research is much different than the quantitative. The details of the qualitative research are discussed in this presentation.
This is the lecture I delivered on the 'Becoming Social Scientist' undergraduate module at the University of Birmingham, as the part of a whole module with students. This is the first introductory lecture entitled 'Ethnography I: Introduction'. During the lecture, it was continuous, the effort to link ethnography with Social Innovation and Design Thinking applied research perspective of Ethnography in the broader social and business context of Birmingham.
A short lecture which looks at a range of different approaches to studying Twitter. Aimed at sociologists, this lecture suggest a multi-method and multi-site approach can help researchers get a full picture of what Twitter is and what it means to people.
Finding Gamers in 140 Characters: Talk of Games on TwitterJason Rutter
This document discusses gamers and gaming practices based on analysis of tweets mentioning the video game Portal 2. The tweets show that gamers discuss their gaming experiences, processes, enthusiasm and game resources on Twitter even when not actively playing. They construct gaming as a routine practice that extends beyond just playing the game itself. The analysis finds that for these gamers, digital play is intertwined with other everyday activities and routines rather than being separated from real life.
Constructing the Pirate: Illegal Downloading and the Ethics of ConsumptionJason Rutter
The document discusses various perspectives on illegal downloading and piracy. It outlines campaigns that portray downloading as theft. It also notes academic studies that characterize piracy in negative terms like "unethical" and "misbehavior." However, the document questions these perspectives and whether they exclude other possible views, such as seeing piracy as a positive economic force or form of media consumption. It suggests the issue is more nuanced and complex than typically portrayed.
This document summarizes a class on qualitative research methods. The class covered:
- The differences between qualitative and quantitative research methods. Qualitative research is flexible and aims to understand experiences, while quantitative research tests hypotheses.
- Various qualitative research approaches were overviewed, including interviews, focus groups, ethnography, and case studies.
- Students practiced developing qualitative research questions and choosing appropriate data collection methods.
- The use of narratives and storytelling in qualitative research was discussed. Different story types can help frame research questions and objectives.
- Exercises had students outline their own qualitative research ideas and identify which story types their research may fit within. Developing the "research story" was emphasized.
This document discusses moral panics and games as a modern moral panic. It begins by providing background on early moral panics such as the Mods vs Rockers conflict in the 1960s. It then examines how moral panics are reported by sensationalizing events and stereotyping groups. Responses to moral panics involve creating awareness of threats and implementing social control measures. The document argues that games are currently the subject of a moral panic, with concerns focused on addiction, health issues, and links to violence. It presents a model for analyzing moral panics that involves emergence of the issue, media reporting, moral entrepreneurs, experts, solutions, and the fading of the panic.
'Playing with Moral Panics: The framing of young people in the reporting of crime and video games'
Presentation given at The Faculty of Education, Anglia Ruskin University, 25th November 2010
The document discusses various perspectives on digital piracy, including campaigns that portray downloaders as criminals or "bad people" as well as academic research describing piracy in negative terms like "unethical" or "questionable". It also examines rationalizations for piracy using techniques of neutralization and questions whether these rationalizations reflect personal motivations or dominant ideology.
PPI Conference: Open Access in AcademiaJason Rutter
This document discusses issues around commercialization and privatization of publicly funded academic research. It argues that allowing commercial publishers to profit from and restrict access to publicly funded research goes against principles of transparency, accountability and sharing of knowledge. Open access publishing is presented as an alternative that allows free public access to research while still supporting peer review and distribution of knowledge. The document suggests ways that pirate parties and others could support increased open access to publicly funded research.
The chapter Lifelines of National Economy in Class 10 Geography focuses on the various modes of transportation and communication that play a vital role in the economic development of a country. These lifelines are crucial for the movement of goods, services, and people, thereby connecting different regions and promoting economic activities.
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptxDenish Jangid
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering
Syllabus
Chapter-1
Introduction to objective, scope and outcome the subject
Chapter 2
Introduction: Scope and Specialization of Civil Engineering, Role of civil Engineer in Society, Impact of infrastructural development on economy of country.
Chapter 3
Surveying: Object Principles & Types of Surveying; Site Plans, Plans & Maps; Scales & Unit of different Measurements.
Linear Measurements: Instruments used. Linear Measurement by Tape, Ranging out Survey Lines and overcoming Obstructions; Measurements on sloping ground; Tape corrections, conventional symbols. Angular Measurements: Instruments used; Introduction to Compass Surveying, Bearings and Longitude & Latitude of a Line, Introduction to total station.
Levelling: Instrument used Object of levelling, Methods of levelling in brief, and Contour maps.
Chapter 4
Buildings: Selection of site for Buildings, Layout of Building Plan, Types of buildings, Plinth area, carpet area, floor space index, Introduction to building byelaws, concept of sun light & ventilation. Components of Buildings & their functions, Basic concept of R.C.C., Introduction to types of foundation
Chapter 5
Transportation: Introduction to Transportation Engineering; Traffic and Road Safety: Types and Characteristics of Various Modes of Transportation; Various Road Traffic Signs, Causes of Accidents and Road Safety Measures.
Chapter 6
Environmental Engineering: Environmental Pollution, Environmental Acts and Regulations, Functional Concepts of Ecology, Basics of Species, Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Hydrological Cycle; Chemical Cycles: Carbon, Nitrogen & Phosphorus; Energy Flow in Ecosystems.
Water Pollution: Water Quality standards, Introduction to Treatment & Disposal of Waste Water. Reuse and Saving of Water, Rain Water Harvesting. Solid Waste Management: Classification of Solid Waste, Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Solid. Recycling of Solid Waste: Energy Recovery, Sanitary Landfill, On-Site Sanitation. Air & Noise Pollution: Primary and Secondary air pollutants, Harmful effects of Air Pollution, Control of Air Pollution. . Noise Pollution Harmful Effects of noise pollution, control of noise pollution, Global warming & Climate Change, Ozone depletion, Greenhouse effect
Text Books:
1. Palancharmy, Basic Civil Engineering, McGraw Hill publishers.
2. Satheesh Gopi, Basic Civil Engineering, Pearson Publishers.
3. Ketki Rangwala Dalal, Essentials of Civil Engineering, Charotar Publishing House.
4. BCP, Surveying volume 1
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.pptHenry Hollis
The History of NZ 1870-1900.
Making of a Nation.
From the NZ Wars to Liberals,
Richard Seddon, George Grey,
Social Laboratory, New Zealand,
Confiscations, Kotahitanga, Kingitanga, Parliament, Suffrage, Repudiation, Economic Change, Agriculture, Gold Mining, Timber, Flax, Sheep, Dairying,
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
BIOLOGY NATIONAL EXAMINATION COUNCIL (NECO) 2024 PRACTICAL MANUAL.pptx
Blag your way in Qualitative Research
1. Blag your way in Qualitative
Research (in less than 40 mins)
Jason Rutter, School of Dentistry, University of DundeeImage: ‘confused’ by TobiGaulke
https://goo.gl/fUvQm1 used under CC BY NC ND
2. Caveats
• This is not a session about how to
do Qualitative Research
• I’m going to try and avoid the
philosophy stuff
• I’m a sociologist…. (Draw your own conclusions)
• I realise your research is special,
precious and, without doubt,
exemplary
• Annnnnd…
Image: ‘Desert Rules’ by Dr. Zhivago -
https://goo.gl/5SxIoc. Used under CC BY NC
4. Questions…
• What is qualitative research?
• What does qualitative research offer?
• What types of qualitative research are there?
• What is qualitative data?
• Where’s the hypothesis?
• Are the findings generalizable?
• What about objectivity?
• How do I recognise poor qualitative research?
Image: ‘Any Questions?’ by Matthias Ripp -
https://goo.gl/FVmWUV. Used under CC BY
5.
6. Interspecies perspective taking
• Tested fMRI scanner with dead
salmon
• Asked it to identify human
emotions
• It did….
• Activity in the brain compare with rest
state
• Of 8064 voxels - 16 significant
• Cluster-level significance of p = 0.001Bennett, C.M., Baird, A.A., Miller, M.B. and Wolford, G.L., 2011. Neural correlates of interspecies
perspective taking in the post-mortem Atlantic salmon: An argument for proper multiple
comparisons correction. Journal of Serendipitous and Unexpected Results, 1, pp.1-5.
7. Interspecies perspective taking
• But , of course, it didn’t really….
• “Random noise in the EPI time
series may yield spurious
results if multiple comparisons
are not controlled for.”
• 25-40% of studies on fMRI were
NOT using the corrected
comparisons.
Bennett, C.M., Baird, A.A., Miller, M.B. and Wolford, G.L., 2011. Neural correlates of interspecies
perspective taking in the post-mortem Atlantic salmon: An argument for proper multiple
comparisons correction. Journal of Serendipitous and Unexpected Results, 1, pp.1-5.
8. Methods alone - whatever they
might be - do not generate
good research or astute
analyses. How researchers use
methods matters. Mechanistic
applications of methods yield
mundane data and routine
reports.
Kathy Charmaz, 2015
Constructing Grounded Theory
“
”
Image: ‘Personal Notes on Call to Action Buttons: Examples and Best Practices’
by Jacob Gube - https://goo.gl/xTvFre. Used under CC
9. What is qualitative research?
Image: ‘what’ by Scott Schiller - https://goo.gl/UbBGqq
Used under CC BY NC
10. What then is time?
If no one asks me, I
know: if I wish to
explain it to one
that asketh, I know
not.
The Confessions of Saint
Augustine Book XI
“
”
Image: ‘time’ by uditha wickramanayaka - https://goo.gl/lg0ZTP
Used under CC BY NC
11. Not just because
It uses qualitative data!
So do literary studies, history, political sciences, religious studies,
philosophy, archaeology, legal studies, linguistics, etc.
12. • Data driven
• Focused on a site
• Inductive
• Reflexive
• Iterative
• Produces theory
Image: ‘i kept telling Geoff the Stormtrooper, but he wouldn't listen.’
by daren – https://goo.gl/5ne7aR. Used under CC
13. General elements
• Emic approach – exploring the meanings of the actor
• Naturalistic enquiry – data gathered within context and on context
• Situated – specific to a particular time and place
• Aims to understand how people manage, experience and understand
a social world
• Focuses on people’s activities, processes, perspectives, categories…
• Uses data which are ‘naturalistic’
• Can integrate unexpected or unique occurrences
14. I lied about the philosophy…
• Associated with phenomenology
• (from Greek phainómenon "that which appears" and lógos
"study")
• Explores the processes and structures of people within
social contexts
• Explores the processes and structures of people creating
social contexts
• Meaning is found in use….
15. What does qualitative research offer?
• Offers an integrated perspective
• Understand group interactions as well as individuals
• Generate ideas and hypotheses
• Illustrates how macro-level concepts are experienced and produced
at micro level
• It can engage with both the rule and exceptions
• Sensitive to contradictions – possible to hold conflicting opinions
• Can detail unexpected or unique occurrences
16. What types of qualitative
research are there?
Image: ‘Choose a Door’ by Adrian Berg -
https://goo.gl/mfpPdg. Used under CC BY NC
18. Why choose a particular method?
• The choice of approach is subjective – but should be motivated
• Looking for a ‘best fit’
• ‘Best fit’ to what?
• Research concern?
• Available data
• Integration with other data and analysis?
• ‘It’s what we do’?
• If research is to be judged on its own terms – it should be clear about
those terms and their rationale.
20. Qualitative researchers
have the annoying habit
of using ‘data’ as a
singular.
Deep down we know this is wrong.
Please don’t correct us,
it makes us sad…
Image: ‘Sad’ by OFour - https://goo.gl/KFMZY5. Used under CC BY NC
21. Making or finding data
• Interviews
• Unstructured (passive/nondirective) interviews (Qual possibly GT)
• Semi-structured (forced) interviews (Qual probably not GT)
• Structured interviews (probably not Qual)
• Focus Groups
• Observational & Participational methods
• Non-reactive methods/Unobtrusive research
• Graffiti
• Meeting minutes
• Recordings
• Rubbish (Garbage)
22. Theoretical statements have
become synonymous with
hypotheses about the
relationships between variables,
and variables have replaced
actors as the active subjects with
causal powers.
Hedström, P., 2005. Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical
Sociology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., p. 105
”
“
Image: ‘Two Pounds’ by Shane Byrd -
https://goo.gl/J5lcV7. Used under CC BY ND
23. ‘All is Data’*
Glaser, Barney G. (2001). The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization
Contrasted with Description. Mill Valley, Ca.: Sociology Press.
*Except numbers, number are bad.
*Except when they aren’t, and then numbers are data.
Image:‘DataShieldsupforthesummer,becauseyoujustneverknow...’
byMarkAhlness-https://goo.gl/xqhQbu.UsedunderCCBYNCND
26. 0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144
Fibonacci Numbers | Virahanka Numbers
Rarely are data
random. Part of the
task of the researcher
is to recognise
structures, identify the
practices that
produced those
structures, and
understand what those
structures are
enabling.
27. Communicative action
is doubly contextual
in being both context-
shaped and context-
renewing.
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press. p.242
Image: ‘context’ by green kozi - https://goo.gl/Xf5PKP. Used under CC BY NC ND
”
“
28. Conversation Analysis
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of
Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
(1) Speaker-change recurs, or at least occurs
(2) Overwhelmingly, one party talks at a time
(3) Occurrences of more than one speaker at a time are common, but brief
(4) Transitions (from one turn to a next) with no gap and no overlap are common.
[…]
(14) Repair mechanisms exist for dealing with turn-taking errors and violations
29. Image: ‘Trying to repair the Camaro’ by clement127
https://goo.gl/jYDoHi. Used under CC BY NC ND
30. Where’s the Hypothesis?
• Not locked in to original concept
• Hypotheses are developed through analysis
• Testing and refining are part of the analytical process
• Analysis often parallel with data collection
• Responsive to findings - can shape direction of data collection
• New data can be added even at later stages of analysis
31. An overemphasis in current
sociology on the verification
of theory, and a resultant de-
emphasis on the prior step of
discovering what concepts
and hypotheses are relevant
for the area that one wishes
to research.
Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory.
London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. p.2-3
“
Image: ‘Lynas (02010289)’ by IAEA Imagebank
https://goo.gl/sLWnV3. Used under CC BY NC ND
33. Coding
• A priori coding
• Deductive – so hard for new knowledge to be generated
• Not reflexive
• About collecting information rather than developing insight
• Quicker and cheaper to undertake other data collection methods.
• Systematises cognitive biases
• May be useful where a FONSI or confirmation of policy is the preferred
outcome…
• Not saying it is wrong….
34. Image: Wrong Way Signs’ by Arizona Department of Transportation
https://goo.gl/nIhn5L. Used under CC BY NC ND
35. Are the findings generalizable?
• Replication is not the same as generalisability
• You can’t step into the same river twice
• Data is specific, but theory aims to generalise an
understanding
• Qualitative work can build on theory making in new sites
• Iterative process
• Engagement with ‘outliers’/‘deviant cases’
36. The First Five Seconds
• PhD research
• Opening of phone calls
• Corpus of 500 calls to & from a
USA police station
• 499 started the same way…
Emanuel Schegloff
Distinguished Professorof Sociology
University of California at Los Angeles
37. Answerer speaks first
• Schegloff 1968
#9 (Police make call)
Receiver is lifted, and there is a one second pause
Police: Hello.
Other: American Red Cross.
Police: Hello, this is Police Headquarters . . . er, Officer Stratton [etc.]
Schegloff, E.A., 1968. Sequencing in Conversational Openings. American Anthropologist, 70(6),
pp.1075–1095.
38. The distribution rule is no less a
‘special case’ for having many
occurrences, nor the latter more
so for having only one. Not
number of occurrences, but
common subsumption under a
more general formulation is what
matters.
Schegloff, E.A., 1968. Sequencing in Conversational Openings. American Anthropologist, 70(6),
pp.1075–1095.
Image: ‘Suitcase’ by Rie H- https://goo.gl/rZ61MF. Used under CC
Image flipped and cropped
”
“
39. Theoretical Saturation
• Specifically linked to Grounded Theory
• Related to Theoretical Sampling
• No new data are apparent…
• Data which stretch diversity have been searched for…
• No further development of category properties is foreseeable…
• Links between concepts have been verified…
• The study could be replicated…
• (Really things are theoretical pretty wet rather than saturated!)
Image: ‘[217/365]’ by Pimthida
https://goo.gl/ByhjyA. Used under CC BY NC ND
(This slide is here because someone always asks about theoretical saturation)
40. What about Objectivity?
This discomfort with
subjectivity clearly makes
sense from a psychological
science standpoint that
emphasizes theoretically
driven research and
replicability of research
procedures and design.
Gough, B., & Madill, A. (2012). Subjectivity in psychological science: From problem to prospect.
Psychological Methods, 17(3), 374–384.
“
”Image: ‘’nit’ by pshab - https://goo.gl/F0e0jh. Used under CC BY NC
41. Onwuegbuzie, A.J. & Leech, N.L., 2007. Validity and Qualitative Research:
An Oxymoron? Quality & Quantity, 41(2), pp.233–249
Researcher bias is a
very common threat to
legitimation in
constructivist research
because the researcher
usually serves as the
person (i.e., instrument)
collecting the data.
“
” Image: ‘Smile for the Camera’ by Matt Reinbold
https://goo.gl/B5wz6A. Used under CC BY SA
42. How do I
recognize
poor qualitative
research?
Image: ‘Little Darlings’ by Dave Wild - https://goo.gl/CCvhk7. Used under CC BY NC
43. Nobody in this room…
• Ever misinterpreted a p-value…
• Went data dredging, data fishing, or
p-hacking…
• Failed to replicate results…
• Inferred from a too small sample…
• Was so subjective they were pleased
their hypothesis was proven
…Yet, a lot of work is poor!
Gelman, A., and Stern, H. (2006) "The difference between ‘significant’ and ‘not significant’ is not
itself statistically significant." The American Statistician 60(4), pp.328-331.
44. • It remains descriptive
• It is essentially quant with qual data
• It classifies or quotes without theory
• It employs quantitative categories without reflexivity
• Keen to reduce data ASAP
• Fears ambiguity and lack of control
• A theory introduced at the end saves the day
Clues to questionable quality
45. Clues to questionable quality
• ‘We used grounded theory’
• ‘We reached theoretical saturation’
• ‘We analysed the data using nVivo’
• ‘We did an ethnography’
• ‘We use inter-analyst triangulation
to ensure consensus’
• It is not firmly situated within a
range of literature
46. The Textbook Method
• Coffey, A. & Atkinson, P., 1996. Making sense of qualitative data:
complementary research strategies, London: Sage.
• Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and
procedures for developing grounded theory, London: Sage.
• Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S., 1994. The Sage handbook of qualitative research,
London: Sage.
• Gubrium, J.F. & Holstein, J.A., 2001. Handbook of interview research: Context
and method, London: Sage.
• Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (Saldana, J.), 1983, Qualitative Data Analysis: A
Methods Sourcebook, London: Sage.
• Ritchie, J. & Lewis, J. (McNaughton Nicholls & Ormston), 2003. Qualitative
research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers,
London: Sage.
47. • Data driven
• Focused on a site
• Inductive
• Reflexive
• Iterative
• Produces theory
Image: ‘i kept telling Geoff the Stormtrooper, but he wouldn't listen.’
by daren – https://goo.gl/5ne7aR. Used under CC
48. Jason Rutter
School of Dentistry,
University of Dundee
J.Rutter@Dundee.ac.uk
Slides Available at
http://jasonrutter.co.uk/
Editor's Notes
Atlantic Salmon
Qualitative data is necessary but not sufficient
These disciplines maybe critical, interpretive, analytical – but not necessarily use qualitative research
Stuff which isn’t numbers too broad a category to be useful
Sites can be places, space, virtual communities
Rutter and Smith: “the definition of the research setting becomes not a starting point but a primary research question requiring careful and continuous examination”
Theory intimately linked to the data – it ‘fits and works’ (Glaser & Strauss)
No one type of data, data collection, method of analysis.
Given, L.M. (Ed.) 2008. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods
Fibonacci series.
Leonardo of Pisa – 1202.
Discovered in India about 1300 years ago
This ‘unstructured’ data is found in apparently structured items – e.g. cabbages, sunflowers, shells,
The numerical basis for the golden ratio
Data tends NOT to be random – even qual data
People tend to produce cohesive interactions.
Part of the research process is finding structures that already exist.
Work hard to produce appropriate answers to questions
Behave in a manner they think others will understand
Verification of the grand theories
Associated with maintaining and developing the theories of white men.
Challenge of making large amounts of data manageable
When to reduce as controversial as how to reduce
Remaining faithful to the whole…
Remember: Exploring meaning NOT causation
Probably NOT possible to get to Theoretical Saturation by only one methods of data collection – e.g. just interviews
Sampling is often purposive of theoretical. Searches for particular cases rather than random ones.
Not possible to sit observing from outside social interaction
Doing things like refusing to give personal information to avoid interviewer bias introduces other biases – ‘TWAT’ bias!
Based on increasing power imbalance between interviewer and interviewee.
Contrary to basic rules of engagement – Grice’s Conversational Maxims/Cooperative Principle…
Data collection – esp interviews – are about building relationships and facilitating communication not extracting pre-existing information.
Not necessarily a belief in an objective, stable reality to be observed from ‘outside’
Research is reflexively part pf the data production and analysis.
‘Truth model’?
Bias relies on a model where data exists outside social interaction.
Co-constructing, difference and biasing are not the same things,..
Interviews are data – not measurements of an outside world.
Is it possible to get a ‘false response’?
Quant perspective include issues such as 55% (or most) people sais, ‘X’ but might also include measures such as ‘high levels of trust’, ‘relatively powerless’, ‘very symbolic’.
In deductive work, discussion can be left until the end as the theory/hypothesis are already in place.
Qual work needs to clearly demonstrate link between data, analysis and theory.
None of these concepts are bad in themselves but often used as an attempt to hide methodological paucity.
In fact any paper which uses the formulation, ‘we used the x Method/theory’ or ‘we analysed data using the Y method’.
Kind of like saying we analysed the experimental data using statistics.
We learn to write, theory and undertake research by reading – lots.
Are data collection, selection and analysis transparent?
Are data collection, selection and analysis systematic?