This document provides an overview of a research methods module. It defines research as the investigation of an idea, subject, or topic for a purpose to extend knowledge or explore theory. The module objectives are to define the research process, understand qualitative and quantitative methods, deploy these methods in business contexts, and report findings. Students will complete a research project in groups and write reflections on their research practice. There will also be an examination with multiple choice and short answer questions. Key dates are provided for assignments and presentations.
Techniques involved in defining a research problemDr.Sangeetha R
This document discusses techniques for defining a research problem. It outlines 5 key steps: 1) State the problem generally through preliminary surveys; 2) Understand the nature and origin of the problem; 3) Survey existing literature to narrow the focus, identify gaps, and inform the research design; 4) Discuss the problem with experts to develop new ideas; 5) Rephrase the research question into an operational working proposition. Defining the problem clearly is important to avoid confusion later in the research process. The researcher must also consider key assumptions, the value of investigating the problem, available data sources, and scope.
The document provides guidance for graduate students on preparing for and undergoing the viva voce (oral defense) examination process. It discusses what a viva is, why they are held, how to prepare, what to expect during the examination, tips for success, potential outcomes, and advice on working with supervisors before and after the viva. Key points covered include presenting research clearly, being prepared to discuss all aspects of the thesis, maintaining composure during questioning, and making corrections or revisions as required by examiners' feedback.
MBA Project VIVA Questions and Guidelinesdowlath ahmed
This document provides guidelines for students presenting their dissertation during a viva-voce examination. It recommends that students prepare a chart summarizing the objectives, methodology, findings, conclusions, and suggestions of their research project. It also recommends creating a 10-slide PowerPoint presentation covering the title, problem statement, objectives, research design, findings, conclusions, and suggestions. The document advises being prepared to present without technology and answers potential questions on the literature review, methodology, and findings. Students should concisely summarize the essential aspects of their dissertation in the limited time provided during the viva-voce.
This document provides guidance on reporting qualitative research results. It explains that qualitative research aims to interpret and make sense of phenomena in their natural settings by understanding people's meanings and perspectives. The main steps in qualitative research are outlined, including formulating research questions, collecting and interpreting data, and writing findings. When reporting results, the researcher must be consistent, clear, precise, and objective while connecting all aspects of the study. General guidelines recommend highlighting the original context, only reporting results for the research questions, using tables and graphs sparingly with explanation, and indicating which questions the results address. Practical tips include introducing each results section, grouping findings logically by category, and describing the method each set of results came from.
This document provides an overview of a research methods module. It defines research as the investigation of an idea, subject, or topic for a purpose to extend knowledge or explore theory. The module objectives are to define the research process, understand qualitative and quantitative methods, deploy these methods in business contexts, and report findings. Students will complete a research project in groups and write reflections on their research practice. There will also be an examination with multiple choice and short answer questions. Key dates are provided for assignments and presentations.
Techniques involved in defining a research problemDr.Sangeetha R
This document discusses techniques for defining a research problem. It outlines 5 key steps: 1) State the problem generally through preliminary surveys; 2) Understand the nature and origin of the problem; 3) Survey existing literature to narrow the focus, identify gaps, and inform the research design; 4) Discuss the problem with experts to develop new ideas; 5) Rephrase the research question into an operational working proposition. Defining the problem clearly is important to avoid confusion later in the research process. The researcher must also consider key assumptions, the value of investigating the problem, available data sources, and scope.
The document provides guidance for graduate students on preparing for and undergoing the viva voce (oral defense) examination process. It discusses what a viva is, why they are held, how to prepare, what to expect during the examination, tips for success, potential outcomes, and advice on working with supervisors before and after the viva. Key points covered include presenting research clearly, being prepared to discuss all aspects of the thesis, maintaining composure during questioning, and making corrections or revisions as required by examiners' feedback.
MBA Project VIVA Questions and Guidelinesdowlath ahmed
This document provides guidelines for students presenting their dissertation during a viva-voce examination. It recommends that students prepare a chart summarizing the objectives, methodology, findings, conclusions, and suggestions of their research project. It also recommends creating a 10-slide PowerPoint presentation covering the title, problem statement, objectives, research design, findings, conclusions, and suggestions. The document advises being prepared to present without technology and answers potential questions on the literature review, methodology, and findings. Students should concisely summarize the essential aspects of their dissertation in the limited time provided during the viva-voce.
This document provides guidance on reporting qualitative research results. It explains that qualitative research aims to interpret and make sense of phenomena in their natural settings by understanding people's meanings and perspectives. The main steps in qualitative research are outlined, including formulating research questions, collecting and interpreting data, and writing findings. When reporting results, the researcher must be consistent, clear, precise, and objective while connecting all aspects of the study. General guidelines recommend highlighting the original context, only reporting results for the research questions, using tables and graphs sparingly with explanation, and indicating which questions the results address. Practical tips include introducing each results section, grouping findings logically by category, and describing the method each set of results came from.
Identifying and defining a research problemRukiyalakhan
The document discusses identifying and defining a research problem. It begins by defining what constitutes a research problem from both a general and scientific perspective. It emphasizes that the research problem is the starting point and unifying thread of any research project. It discusses the importance of the research problem in providing direction for the research. The document outlines sources for identifying potential research problems, including gaps in existing literature and contradictory findings. It discusses developing a research topic/title and steps to take to properly define the research problem, such as narrowing the topic and determining feasibility.
This document provides an introduction and overview of the Research Methods in Sport & Exercise module. It outlines the module content, three assessments, and expectations. The assessments include a quantitative data analysis assignment, qualitative research project in groups, and a formal research proposal. The instructor emphasizes that the module covers the entire research process and aims to prepare students for their dissertation. Students are expected to complete all readings and engage actively in class.
The Purpose and Process of PhD Comprehensive VIVA Examination (IIIT Hyderabad...Subhajit Sahu
Highlighted notes on:
The Purpose and Process of PhD Comprehensive VIVA Examination (IIIT Hyderabad)
After clearing breadth qualifier (while doing depth courses), student needs to do literature survey deeply on 8-10 research papers (needs to be forwarded to advisory committee), along with studying other related papers.
Advisory committee is your advisor, a subject matter expert, and another member outside of the area of research. Student is given a set of questions beforehand based on selected papers.
A report (6-10 pages) and presentation needs to be prepared before the comprehensive viva.
This document provides an overview of research and the research process. It discusses that research involves asking questions and finding answers through systematic procedures. Research can be qualitative, involving more subjective methods, or quantitative, using more objective methods. The goal of research is to describe phenomena, determine causes of behavior, predict behavior, and explain behavior. Strong research is theory-driven, testable, replicable, and seeks to minimize bias. The research process involves forming a question or hypothesis, designing a study, collecting and analyzing data, and drawing conclusions. Presentations of research should be clear, well-organized, and visually engaging for audiences.
Penyelidikan kualitatif reporting and presenting qd (mrine cove)Edaham Ismail
This document provides an overview of key concepts in qualitative research reporting and writing. It discusses features of qualitative research such as being naturalistic, using descriptive data, focusing on process, and aiming to understand meaning. It also covers components of qualitative research reports such as the introduction, methodology, findings, and discussion sections. The document gives guidance on writing style, presenting data, addressing ethics, and finalizing the report.
This document summarizes an empirical research methodology course. The course teaches students research methods for exploring how information systems are designed, implemented and used in real-world settings. Students produce a research plan for their master's thesis as a deliverable. The plan template is based on a referenced book and should include the research purpose, contributions, method, participants, and paradigm. Common issues with plans include vague research questions and an overly ambitious scope. An iterative approach to the research plan is emphasized.
Social studies school based assessment outlineDeighton Gooden
The document outlines the requirements and tasks for a Social Studies School Based Assessment (SBA) project in the Caribbean. Students must:
1) Conduct guided research on a topic related to social or economic issues in their community. They must state the problem as a research question, rationale, and additional research questions.
2) Design a data collection instrument, describe procedures, and present and analyze findings through graphs, tables or other visuals.
3) Provide conclusions and recommendations based on three findings. The final SBA report must be 1000-1200 words and include all outlined tasks. Drafts are due in November and February, with strict deadlines to allow teacher feedback.
Overview on techniques involved in defining a problemVIKAS ARYA
Let us start with the question: What does one mean when he/she wants to define a research problem? The answer may be that one wants to state the problem along with the bounds within which it is to be studied. In other words, defining a problem involves the task of laying down boundaries within which a researcher shall study the problem with a pre-determined objective in view. How to define a research problem is undoubtedly a herculean task. However, it is a task that must be tackled intelligently to avoid the perplexity encountered in a research operation. The usual approach is that the researcher should himself pose a question (or in case someone else wants the researcher to carry on research, the concerned individual, organization or an authority should pose the question to the researcher) and set-up techniques and procedures for throwing light on the question concerned for formulating or defining the research problem. But such an approach generally does not produce definitive results because the question phrased in such a fashion is usually in broad general terms and as such may not be in a form suitable for testing. Defining a research problem properly and clearly is a crucial part of a research study and must in no case be accomplished hurriedly. However, in practice this a frequently overlooked which causes a lot of problems later on. Hence, the research problem should be defined in a systematic manner, giving due weightage to all relating points.
This document provides guidance on exploring research questions. It discusses that research questions should define the overall plan and scope of a project. The document outlines a process for moving from a general topic to specific research questions, including brainstorming questions in both structured and unstructured ways. Key steps involve clarifying concepts, stakeholders, goals and metrics; exploring "how" and "why" questions about the topic; and determining if questions are clear, focused, and complex enough to require analysis. Hypothesizing how others may challenge arguments is also recommended. Structured and unstructured brainstorming techniques are presented to generate potential research questions.
The document provides information on designing questionnaires and surveys. It discusses determining research questions, different types of surveys, principles of good survey design, question formatting and layout, advantages and disadvantages of questionnaires, improving response rates, question types, designing effective questions, and data analysis. Key points covered include framing the research question, descriptive vs. analytic vs. exploratory vs. confirmatory surveys, keeping surveys concise, credible, and minimizing burden on respondents.
This document provides guidance and suggestions for preparing for and handling a viva voce (oral defense) examination. It discusses the two types of viva approaches, greeting the examiners, listening carefully to questions, giving precise but explanatory answers, and not apologizing. It includes checklists for knowing the research benefits and limitations, examiners' backgrounds, current research, and backed up evidence. It suggests having a mock viva, re-reading the thesis, preparing examples questions and answers, and studying the examiners' backgrounds. The document outlines dos and don'ts, handling questions politely, maintaining eye contact, and focusing on questions. It provides sample viva questions and suggests knowing how to discuss the research methodology, analysis approach
The document outlines several design processes that engineers may follow when developing solutions to problems. It provides examples of 12-step design processes that include activities like defining problems, brainstorming solutions, researching existing approaches, developing prototypes, testing designs, and refining solutions based on evaluations. The document emphasizes that design is a systematic problem-solving process that considers criteria, constraints, and the needs of end users.
The document provides an overview of the case method approach to analyzing case studies. It describes what a case study is and how the case method is used as a learning tool. The key aspects of analyzing a case study are outlined, including: defining the problem, analyzing the case data, generating alternatives, selecting decision criteria, evaluating alternatives, and making a recommendation. Students are guided through a two-step process of preparing a case - the short cycle process of initial familiarization and the long cycle process of more detailed analysis. The document emphasizes analyzing the issues, considering various stakeholder perspectives, and justifying a recommendation based on evaluation criteria.
How to design surveys; describes differences between approaches to measuring awareness, opinions, perceptions, behaviors, needs and attitudes; describes roles of survey sponsor and researcher.
This document provides guidance on creating and conducting effective surveys. It explains that surveys are used to gather information from a sample group that represents a larger population. The sample size should include enough people with different characteristics to represent the overall population. The document then lists 10 tips for creating good surveys, such as using simple language, asking one question per item, avoiding biased questions, and testing the survey before widespread use. The goal is to design clear, concise surveys that gather accurate and useful information.
Here are my slides for my session for the International Institute of Business Analysis (May 23, 2012). I focus on best practices of survey design, highlighting qualitative data.
The document provides guidance on writing a research title. It states that a research title should summarize the main topic and key variables being studied in a concise way. Titles should be around 12-15 words to be effective. Examples of good titles are given, such as "Modern Counseling: Freudian Theory with a New Face" for a study on the influence of psychoanalysis on counseling. Guidelines are given that the title should reflect the general problem or variable being investigated by the research. Sources for topic ideas can come from theories, prior research, and personal experiences. Developing a title requires narrowing a topic to be sufficiently focused and manageable for a research study.
This document provides guidance on formulating and clarifying a research topic for a business research project. It discusses generating research ideas, identifying attributes of a good research topic, turning ideas into research problems with clear questions and objectives, and drafting a research proposal. Key points covered include techniques for generating topics, writing research questions and objectives, ensuring topics are feasible and worthwhile, and including necessary components in a research proposal such as background, methods, timescale, and resources.
This document outlines the contents and structure of a graduate seminar/research seminar course. The course focuses on developing research proposals, academic writing skills like referencing and citation, and oral presentation skills. It discusses selecting research topics and writing different sections of a research proposal like the introduction, objectives, literature review, and evaluation criteria. Key components of a research proposal are defined, including the preliminary sections like the title page, table of contents, and operational definitions. Presenting seminars and creating PowerPoint presentations are also covered.
This document outlines guidelines for writing and presenting a project report. It discusses allocating sufficient time for writing, using an appropriate structure including an abstract, introduction, literature review, results, discussion and conclusions. The report structure should answer the research questions and meet the objectives. When writing, the content should be organized clearly with a story-like flow, previews, summaries, tables and graphics. The writing style should be clear, simple, grammatically correct and anonymous. Oral presentations require planning, preparation and effective use of visual aids.
Identifying and defining a research problemRukiyalakhan
The document discusses identifying and defining a research problem. It begins by defining what constitutes a research problem from both a general and scientific perspective. It emphasizes that the research problem is the starting point and unifying thread of any research project. It discusses the importance of the research problem in providing direction for the research. The document outlines sources for identifying potential research problems, including gaps in existing literature and contradictory findings. It discusses developing a research topic/title and steps to take to properly define the research problem, such as narrowing the topic and determining feasibility.
This document provides an introduction and overview of the Research Methods in Sport & Exercise module. It outlines the module content, three assessments, and expectations. The assessments include a quantitative data analysis assignment, qualitative research project in groups, and a formal research proposal. The instructor emphasizes that the module covers the entire research process and aims to prepare students for their dissertation. Students are expected to complete all readings and engage actively in class.
The Purpose and Process of PhD Comprehensive VIVA Examination (IIIT Hyderabad...Subhajit Sahu
Highlighted notes on:
The Purpose and Process of PhD Comprehensive VIVA Examination (IIIT Hyderabad)
After clearing breadth qualifier (while doing depth courses), student needs to do literature survey deeply on 8-10 research papers (needs to be forwarded to advisory committee), along with studying other related papers.
Advisory committee is your advisor, a subject matter expert, and another member outside of the area of research. Student is given a set of questions beforehand based on selected papers.
A report (6-10 pages) and presentation needs to be prepared before the comprehensive viva.
This document provides an overview of research and the research process. It discusses that research involves asking questions and finding answers through systematic procedures. Research can be qualitative, involving more subjective methods, or quantitative, using more objective methods. The goal of research is to describe phenomena, determine causes of behavior, predict behavior, and explain behavior. Strong research is theory-driven, testable, replicable, and seeks to minimize bias. The research process involves forming a question or hypothesis, designing a study, collecting and analyzing data, and drawing conclusions. Presentations of research should be clear, well-organized, and visually engaging for audiences.
Penyelidikan kualitatif reporting and presenting qd (mrine cove)Edaham Ismail
This document provides an overview of key concepts in qualitative research reporting and writing. It discusses features of qualitative research such as being naturalistic, using descriptive data, focusing on process, and aiming to understand meaning. It also covers components of qualitative research reports such as the introduction, methodology, findings, and discussion sections. The document gives guidance on writing style, presenting data, addressing ethics, and finalizing the report.
This document summarizes an empirical research methodology course. The course teaches students research methods for exploring how information systems are designed, implemented and used in real-world settings. Students produce a research plan for their master's thesis as a deliverable. The plan template is based on a referenced book and should include the research purpose, contributions, method, participants, and paradigm. Common issues with plans include vague research questions and an overly ambitious scope. An iterative approach to the research plan is emphasized.
Social studies school based assessment outlineDeighton Gooden
The document outlines the requirements and tasks for a Social Studies School Based Assessment (SBA) project in the Caribbean. Students must:
1) Conduct guided research on a topic related to social or economic issues in their community. They must state the problem as a research question, rationale, and additional research questions.
2) Design a data collection instrument, describe procedures, and present and analyze findings through graphs, tables or other visuals.
3) Provide conclusions and recommendations based on three findings. The final SBA report must be 1000-1200 words and include all outlined tasks. Drafts are due in November and February, with strict deadlines to allow teacher feedback.
Overview on techniques involved in defining a problemVIKAS ARYA
Let us start with the question: What does one mean when he/she wants to define a research problem? The answer may be that one wants to state the problem along with the bounds within which it is to be studied. In other words, defining a problem involves the task of laying down boundaries within which a researcher shall study the problem with a pre-determined objective in view. How to define a research problem is undoubtedly a herculean task. However, it is a task that must be tackled intelligently to avoid the perplexity encountered in a research operation. The usual approach is that the researcher should himself pose a question (or in case someone else wants the researcher to carry on research, the concerned individual, organization or an authority should pose the question to the researcher) and set-up techniques and procedures for throwing light on the question concerned for formulating or defining the research problem. But such an approach generally does not produce definitive results because the question phrased in such a fashion is usually in broad general terms and as such may not be in a form suitable for testing. Defining a research problem properly and clearly is a crucial part of a research study and must in no case be accomplished hurriedly. However, in practice this a frequently overlooked which causes a lot of problems later on. Hence, the research problem should be defined in a systematic manner, giving due weightage to all relating points.
This document provides guidance on exploring research questions. It discusses that research questions should define the overall plan and scope of a project. The document outlines a process for moving from a general topic to specific research questions, including brainstorming questions in both structured and unstructured ways. Key steps involve clarifying concepts, stakeholders, goals and metrics; exploring "how" and "why" questions about the topic; and determining if questions are clear, focused, and complex enough to require analysis. Hypothesizing how others may challenge arguments is also recommended. Structured and unstructured brainstorming techniques are presented to generate potential research questions.
The document provides information on designing questionnaires and surveys. It discusses determining research questions, different types of surveys, principles of good survey design, question formatting and layout, advantages and disadvantages of questionnaires, improving response rates, question types, designing effective questions, and data analysis. Key points covered include framing the research question, descriptive vs. analytic vs. exploratory vs. confirmatory surveys, keeping surveys concise, credible, and minimizing burden on respondents.
This document provides guidance and suggestions for preparing for and handling a viva voce (oral defense) examination. It discusses the two types of viva approaches, greeting the examiners, listening carefully to questions, giving precise but explanatory answers, and not apologizing. It includes checklists for knowing the research benefits and limitations, examiners' backgrounds, current research, and backed up evidence. It suggests having a mock viva, re-reading the thesis, preparing examples questions and answers, and studying the examiners' backgrounds. The document outlines dos and don'ts, handling questions politely, maintaining eye contact, and focusing on questions. It provides sample viva questions and suggests knowing how to discuss the research methodology, analysis approach
The document outlines several design processes that engineers may follow when developing solutions to problems. It provides examples of 12-step design processes that include activities like defining problems, brainstorming solutions, researching existing approaches, developing prototypes, testing designs, and refining solutions based on evaluations. The document emphasizes that design is a systematic problem-solving process that considers criteria, constraints, and the needs of end users.
The document provides an overview of the case method approach to analyzing case studies. It describes what a case study is and how the case method is used as a learning tool. The key aspects of analyzing a case study are outlined, including: defining the problem, analyzing the case data, generating alternatives, selecting decision criteria, evaluating alternatives, and making a recommendation. Students are guided through a two-step process of preparing a case - the short cycle process of initial familiarization and the long cycle process of more detailed analysis. The document emphasizes analyzing the issues, considering various stakeholder perspectives, and justifying a recommendation based on evaluation criteria.
How to design surveys; describes differences between approaches to measuring awareness, opinions, perceptions, behaviors, needs and attitudes; describes roles of survey sponsor and researcher.
This document provides guidance on creating and conducting effective surveys. It explains that surveys are used to gather information from a sample group that represents a larger population. The sample size should include enough people with different characteristics to represent the overall population. The document then lists 10 tips for creating good surveys, such as using simple language, asking one question per item, avoiding biased questions, and testing the survey before widespread use. The goal is to design clear, concise surveys that gather accurate and useful information.
Here are my slides for my session for the International Institute of Business Analysis (May 23, 2012). I focus on best practices of survey design, highlighting qualitative data.
The document provides guidance on writing a research title. It states that a research title should summarize the main topic and key variables being studied in a concise way. Titles should be around 12-15 words to be effective. Examples of good titles are given, such as "Modern Counseling: Freudian Theory with a New Face" for a study on the influence of psychoanalysis on counseling. Guidelines are given that the title should reflect the general problem or variable being investigated by the research. Sources for topic ideas can come from theories, prior research, and personal experiences. Developing a title requires narrowing a topic to be sufficiently focused and manageable for a research study.
This document provides guidance on formulating and clarifying a research topic for a business research project. It discusses generating research ideas, identifying attributes of a good research topic, turning ideas into research problems with clear questions and objectives, and drafting a research proposal. Key points covered include techniques for generating topics, writing research questions and objectives, ensuring topics are feasible and worthwhile, and including necessary components in a research proposal such as background, methods, timescale, and resources.
This document outlines the contents and structure of a graduate seminar/research seminar course. The course focuses on developing research proposals, academic writing skills like referencing and citation, and oral presentation skills. It discusses selecting research topics and writing different sections of a research proposal like the introduction, objectives, literature review, and evaluation criteria. Key components of a research proposal are defined, including the preliminary sections like the title page, table of contents, and operational definitions. Presenting seminars and creating PowerPoint presentations are also covered.
This document outlines guidelines for writing and presenting a project report. It discusses allocating sufficient time for writing, using an appropriate structure including an abstract, introduction, literature review, results, discussion and conclusions. The report structure should answer the research questions and meet the objectives. When writing, the content should be organized clearly with a story-like flow, previews, summaries, tables and graphics. The writing style should be clear, simple, grammatically correct and anonymous. Oral presentations require planning, preparation and effective use of visual aids.
This document outlines the coursework and schedule for an Advanced English for Academic Communication course. It includes information on assignments that make up the coursework marks and topics to be covered each weekend of the course, including research planning, data collection and analysis, and writing a research report. The course will provide instruction on conducting research, including developing a research proposal, collecting and processing data, and writing each section of a research report.
Assessment Information
Subject Code: BUS606
Subject Name: Business Research Proposal Topic Selection, Justification and
Presentation
Assessment Title: Assessment 1 – Individual Presentation
Weighting: 15 %
Total Marks:
Length:
15
Minimum of 10 slides (+- 10%)
Due Date: Submission due Week 6– Sunday at 11.59 pm
COURSE: Master of Business (Research)
Unit: Business Research Proposal and Literature Review
Unit Code: BUS606
Type of
Assessment:
Assessment 1 – Individual Presentation
Unit Learning
Outcomes
addressed:
(a) Demonstrate an advanced ability to identify, assimilate,
and review applications of, particular research techniques.
(b) Identify various means of data collection that are feasible
and can be ethically enacted.
(c) Articulate and critically evaluate differences between
alternative research methodologies.
(d) Explain how research outcomes may be affected by the
nature and application of particular research techniques.
(e) Demonstrate an advanced ability to construct a robust
methodology for addressing a research question.
(f) Explain how the use of selected methodologies is relevant
to a specific research proposal.
Criteria for
Assessment:
Understanding of the proposed project
Evidence of analysis
Organisation and use of visual aids
Non-verbal & verbal communication skills
Assessment Task:
Students are to select their proposed research topic for the Master
of Business Research thesis and make a presentation to the class
for at least 10 minutes followed by question and answer. The
presentation is required to use PowerPoint slides.
Submission Date:
Week 6– Sunday at 11.59 pm (online submission) of the
PowerPoint presentation slide deck.
Total Mark &
Weighting:
15 marks | 15%
Students are advised that any submissions past the due date without an approved
extension or approved extenuating circumstances incur a 5% penalty per calendar
day,
calculated from the total mark e.g. a task marked out of 15 will incur a 1.75 mark penalty
per calendar day.
Assessment 1– Individual Presentation. Presentations will be made during the
scheduled class time.
Assessment Description
Students are required to select a proposed research topic for their Master of Business
Research thesis that is aligned to one of the seven Research Clusters in the School of
Business as listed below. Students are required to make a presentation for 10 minutes to the
class on their proposed research topic and answer questions from the class and the lecturer.
Students must conduct extensive research on the topic and must cite relevant sources to
support their research proposal.
The MBR Research Clusters are:
Cluster 1: Leadership and Management of Large Corporations
Cluster 2: Leadership and Management of Not-for Profit Organisations
Cluster 3: Leadership and Management of Start-ups, SMEs and Family Business
Cluster 4: ...
The document provides guidance on writing articles for international journals. It discusses various aspects of writing such as titles, abstracts, introductions, methods, findings, discussions, and references. Common problems for Indonesian writers are identified, such as lack of literature reviews and demonstrating original contributions. The document provides tips for strong writing in each section and acknowledges sources to avoid plagiarism. Overall, the document aims to help authors prepare more publishable manuscripts for international peer-reviewed journals.
The document outlines the course syllabus and schedule for an Advanced English for Academic Communication course. It provides details on coursework requirements and marking breakdown. It then covers topics to be discussed each weekend, including research planning, proposal presentation, data collection and analysis, report writing, and oral presentations. Guidance is given on conducting research, writing research proposals, collecting and analyzing primary and secondary data, writing research reports, and delivering oral presentations. Key aspects like literature reviews, methodology, findings and discussion, and conclusion and recommendations are also explained.
This document provides guidance on writing scientific journal papers. It discusses choosing an appropriate journal, following the journal's format and submission guidelines, and the peer review process. The format section describes the typical components of a research paper, including title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, conclusions, figures/tables, and references. It emphasizes adhering to the journal's instructions for authors and style guidelines. The peer review section outlines that submitted papers are initially screened and may be edited for language before anonymous experts evaluate the scientific content. Authors may be asked to revise papers based on reviewer feedback.
This document provides an outline and guidelines for writing a research report. It begins with an introduction to research and defining what constitutes a research report. It then discusses the purpose and importance of research reports, as well as characteristics of effective reports. The document outlines the typical structure of a research report, including sections such as the introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusions. It provides tips for each section and guidelines on style, formatting, and referencing. The overall document serves as a comprehensive guide for writing research reports.
An outline of the major components of the research proposal:
Cover Page:
Title (A case study of …….)
Purpose why the research is conducted
Name and Address of the investigator (Student researcher)
Name and Address of the advisor
Logo
Month and Place where the proposal is written
Acknowledgement
Table of Contents
List of Tables
List of Figures
List of Acronyms
Background of the study: General to specific or deductive order is recommended
Statement of the problem: (Justification of the study)
Research Objectives, Research Questions, and Research Hypothesis:
1.3.1 Research Objectives – Ends to be met in conducting the research
This shows what the investigator will analyze and how;
What comparisons to make and at what level
General Objective: Often one statement directly related to the topic.
Specific Objectives: Often 3-5;
What the researcher want to achieve
What to analyze and compare
1.3.2 Research Questions – Questions to be answered to meet the research objectives or produce implications of the hypothesis.
1.3.3 Research Hypothesis (Optional) – Tentative propositions to be tested in the research.
1.4 Research Methodology:
1.4.1 Data Type and Source (Decide one of them or both by giving justifications)
Qualitative V/s Quantitative (Give reasons)
Primary Sources (Decide on which method or methods to use by stating justifiable reasons)
Questionnaires
Interviews
Observations
Focus group discussions
Secondary Sources (Decide on which method or methods to use by stating justifiable reasons) and exactly state the sources from which you will get the data.
-Reports, manuals, internal publications, data base systems, Journals and Publications for assessing existing findings and internet.
-Books for assessing theories and principles related to the topic etc.
1.4.2 Study design:
Census V/s Survey (Decide which one to use and why?).
Survey Design (Decide on the survey designs to be used by investigator clearly stating the reasons for your decision).
Sample Size (Use the sample size determinations formula as a base and make adjustments with due regard to the target population and the homogeneity or heterogeneity of the population characteristics).
Sampling Design (Show how and why you are going to use the different techniques of probability and/or non-probability sampling techniques).
1.4.3 Data Collection:
State the data collection tool or tools to be used with necessary justifications written in the proposal.
Questionnaire design
Questionnaire testing or pretesting if necessary
So you want to write a technical paper!George Earle
This presentation takes you through the 6 KEY STEPS to writing a technical or white paper to accelerate your career and become known as an expert in your organization.
The document provides guidance on report writing. It discusses what a report is, why reports are written, differences between reports and essays, and sections of a typical report. A report is a structured document that presents information clearly and succinctly to help make decisions or account for actions. It uses headings and subheadings to break up content. Reports are used in business, science labs, and case studies. They are meant to be practical, evaluative, and analytical rather than theoretical like essays. Reports also help develop written communication skills and can model documents written in future jobs or academic journals.
BRM_Data Analysis, Interpretation and Reporting Part III.pptAbdifatahAhmedHurre
This document provides information on data analysis, interpretation and reporting for business research methods. It discusses various topics related to writing research reports including data management software, hypothesis testing, descriptive and inferential analysis, interpretation, and scientific writing. It describes the key components of a technical research report such as the introduction, literature review, methods, findings and discussions. It also discusses different types of research reports, the writing process, and common problems to avoid when preparing reports such as being too long or short, unclear problem definition, and not properly citing literature.
Writing a research proposal is a very important step for research at any level. Good quality research is always based on a perfectly planned outline. The meaning & the procedure of writing a research proposal is described in the given presentation.
This document provides guidance on writing different sections of an academic paper, including the introduction, methods, results and discussion, and conclusion sections. It also provides guidance on writing an abstract, including what key elements should be included such as the purpose, methods, results, and conclusions of the research. The document advises that students review each other's abstracts, ask questions for clarity, and suggest improvements to help strengthen abstract writing skills. It concludes by assigning homework for students to rewrite their abstract based on peer feedback and reflect on lessons learned from the review process.
This document provides guidance on structuring an MBA dissertation. It discusses the overall framework, which includes sections like the introduction, literature review, methodology, data presentation and analysis, discussion, and conclusions. The dissertation should be 20,000-25,000 words not including references or appendices. Plagiarism is unacceptable. Students should begin work early and meet regularly with their supervisor. The research proposal should define the research question and objectives, and describe the methodology and analysis. Specific aspects like the abstract, literature review, and data presentation/analysis are also addressed.
This document provides guidance on writing a research paper, outlining its typical structure and key elements. It discusses the importance of writing a research paper, as well as the standard sections - introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion. It also covers best practices for titles, keywords, citations, and avoiding plagiarism. The document aims to help students and researchers improve their written reports and research papers.
Similar to Bj research session 10 presenting your findings (20)
Human Factors in Project Management Session 6 leadership issue 1Ian Cammack
The document discusses various theories and definitions of leadership. It begins by differentiating leadership from management, noting leadership involves influencing others beyond routine directives. Several definitions of leadership are provided, focusing on directing group activities towards goals, articulating visions and values, and incremental influence. The document then discusses different theories of leadership, including heroic, charismatic, transformational, and situational approaches. It also addresses debates around whether leadership can be taught and explores characteristics of different leadership styles.
Human Factors in Project Management Session 5 team working issue 1 Ian Cammack
This document discusses key concepts related to effective teamwork. It begins by outlining different approaches to teams, from scientific management to sociotechnical teams. It then discusses the difference between working groups and high-performing teams using Katzenbach and Smith's team performance curve model. The document also covers focusing on team basics, addressing potential group vacuums, sources of power and influence, Belbin team roles, Tuckman's model of team formation, and helpful vs unhelpful team behaviors. Diagrams and models are provided to illustrate these concepts.
Human Factors in Project Management Session 4 motivation issue 1Ian Cammack
This document discusses various theories of motivation including:
1. Maslow's hierarchy of needs which describes human needs from basic physiological needs to self-actualization.
2. Herzberg's two-factor theory which separates motivators like achievement and recognition from hygiene factors.
3. McClelland's theory on achievement, power, and affiliation needs.
4. Expectancy, equity, goal-setting, and reinforcement theories of motivation.
Human factors in project Management Session 3 communications issue 1Ian Cammack
This document discusses effective communication strategies for project management. It covers communication planning, key audiences, methods of communication, and barriers to effective communication. The document emphasizes understanding stakeholder needs, distributing information in a timely manner, and using various channels like meetings, listening skills, and email appropriately. Overall, the document provides guidance on developing strong communication practices to support project goals and stakeholder relationships.
Human Factors in Project Management: Stakeholder ManagementIan Cammack
This document provides an overview of stakeholder management for project management. It begins by defining stakeholders as groups who have an interest in the project outcomes. It then outlines a stakeholder management process involving identifying stakeholders and success criteria, conducting stakeholder analysis, implementing strategies, and monitoring changes and satisfaction. The document discusses identifying internal and external stakeholders and analyzing their power, interests, and other factors. It provides examples of stakeholder mapping and discusses strategies for different levels of stakeholder commitment. Reading recommendations are provided on further researching stakeholder management.
Human Factors in Project Management Session 1 projects are about people issue 1Ian Cammack
The document discusses organizational behavior and project management structures. It defines organizational behavior and examines its influences from psychology, sociology, anthropology, and politics. It then discusses different project management structures including functional, dedicated team, and matrix structures. For each structure, it outlines the advantages and disadvantages. It emphasizes that the appropriate structure depends on considerations like the project's importance, resources available, size, strategic importance, and environmental complexity. The document also discusses key roles in projects and how responsibilities are divided in a matrix structure between project and functional managers.
This document provides an overview of project management concepts from a course on the topic. It defines a project as a temporary endeavor undertaken to create a unique product or service. It discusses the project life cycle, including initiation, planning, execution, and closure phases. It also contrasts the task and organizational perspectives on managing projects and notes the importance of considering stakeholders.
This document discusses work breakdown structures (WBS), which are hierarchical decompositions of the work required to complete a project. It defines a WBS and provides examples. The key purposes of a WBS are to define the project scope, assist with communication and planning, and provide a framework for monitoring progress. The document outlines best practices for constructing a WBS, including ensuring it includes all deliverables and work, decomposing work into an appropriate level of detail, and using a coding scheme. Risks of a poorly constructed WBS include an incomplete project definition and scope creep.
Dr Ian Cammack discusses product-based planning for project management. Key elements include product descriptions, which define each product's purpose, composition, and quality criteria. The product breakdown structure identifies all products needed to achieve final deliverables. It also shows how products are related through integration or collective grouping. The product flow diagram illustrates the order products are created or obtained. Product-based planning provides clarity on project requirements and deliverables.
This document discusses various approaches and considerations for project selection. It emphasizes that selecting projects requires balancing risk versus value to make the most effective use of resources. Several approaches are presented, including using checklists, scoring matrices, and assessing value versus risk. Financial, strategic, organizational, technical, and other criteria should be weighed. Project selection is linked to an organization's overall strategic goals and objectives. The key is selecting projects that offer the best returns and outcomes while managing risks.
This document discusses requirements for project management. It defines requirements as representing what stakeholders want and different viewpoints to check designs and measure progress. Gathering requirements is an iterative process that takes time and involves eliciting, analyzing, and negotiating requirements from stakeholders. Requirements should avoid ambiguity and focus on simple, direct statements in plain English to define verifiable criteria. Prioritization is also important to distinguish between must-have, want-to-have, and luxury requirements.
This document provides an overview of key concepts in goal directed project management (GDPM) including the GDPM framework, project mandate, stakeholder analysis, principle responsibility chart, milestones, and milestone responsibility chart. It defines these terms and provides examples to illustrate how each component is used to plan and control a project at both the milestone and task level to ensure it delivers its intended goals.
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit InnovationTechSoup
In this webinar, participants learned how to utilize Generative AI to streamline operations and elevate member engagement. Amazon Web Service experts provided a customer specific use cases and dived into low/no-code tools that are quick and easy to deploy through Amazon Web Service (AWS.)
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdfTechSoup
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two HeartsSteve Thomason
These slides walk through the story of 1 Samuel. Samuel is the last judge of Israel. The people reject God and want a king. Saul is anointed as the first king, but he is not a good king. David, the shepherd boy is anointed and Saul is envious of him. David shows honor while Saul continues to self destruct.
2. Slide 1.2
Getting started with writing
Practical hints
Create time for your writing
Write when your mind is fresh
Find a regular writing place
Set goals and achieve them
Use word processing
Generate a plan for the report
Finish each writing session on a high point
Get friends to read and comment on your work
3. Slide 1.3
Structuring your research report
Suggested structure
Abstract
Introduction
Literature review
Method
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References
Appendices
4. Slide 1.4
Writing for different audiences
Key differences between an ‘Academic’ report
and a ‘Consultancy’ or ‘Management’ report
The academic report:
Tends to be longer
Will be marked and graded
Will contain contextual descriptions
The consultancy report:
Has less focus on the development of theory
Contains recommendations relating to the organisation’s
business
5. Slide 1.5
Report structure (1)
The abstract
Four short paragraphs that answer the questions:
1. What were my research questions and why were they
important?
2. How did I go about answering the research questions?
3. What did I find out in response to these questions?
4. What conclusions can be drawn?
Adapted from Saunders et al. (2009)
6. Slide 1.6
Report structure (2)
Introduction - include
The research questions(s) and a clear statement of research
objectives
Brief background and a guide to the storyline
Literature review - purpose
To set your study in the wider context
To show how your study supplements existing work
7. Slide 1.7
Report structure (3): Methods Chapter
Setting:
What was the research setting?
Why was this chosen?
What ethical issues were raised?
Participants:
How many?
How were they selected?
What were the characteristics?
How were refusals / non-returns
handled?
Materials:
What tests / interviews /
questionnaires etc. were used?
How ere the instruments
deployed?
How were the results analysed?
Procedures:
What were the characteristics of
the interviews and observers and
how were they trained?
How valid and reliable do you
think they were?
What instructions were given to
participants
How many
When was it carried out?
8. Slide 1.8
Report structure (4)
Results chapter(s) - purpose
To report the facts your research discovered
To support the facts with quotes from participants
Discussion chapter- purpose
To interpret results and relate the findings to the original
research goals and objectives
To indicate implications of the research
9. Slide 1.9
Report structure (5)
Using a matrix in the planning of the content for the results
and conclusions chapters
Saunders et al. (2009)
Figure 14.1 Using a matrix in the planning of the content for the results and
conclusions chapters
10. Slide 1.10
Report structure (6)
Conclusion chapter – purpose
To answer the research question(s)
To meet the research objectives
To consider the findings
To present any contributions to the topic displayed in the
literature
To reflect on any implications for future research
11. Slide 1.11
Report structure (7)
References
Use a convention that is accepted by your university (e.g.
Harvard, APA)
Cite all sources referred to in the text
Check all citations to prevent plagiarism
Appendices
Include only essential supporting material
Include copies of interview schedules
Keep appendices to a minimum
12. Slide 1.12
Organising the report content (2)
Main points to consider
Choosing the title
Telling a clear story
Helping the reader by-
Dividing your work
Previewing and summarising chapters
Using suitable tables and graphics
Writing in a suitable style
13. Slide 1.13
Writing style
Key points:
Clarity and simplicity – avoid jargon
Checking grammar and spelling
Preserving anonymity
Regularly revising each draft
15. Slide 1.15
Summary:
Writing is a creative process and a powerful way to clarifying
your thinking
A project report needs a clear structure that helps to develop
the storyline
All the information should be readily accessible to the reader
16. Slide 1.16
Summary:
Use a clear writing style free and check for spelling and
grammatical errors
Be prepared to rewrite the first draft several times
Remember to check the assessment criteria
17. Slide 1.17
Summary:
Failing to prepare for your presentation is preparing to fail
Visual aids help the audience understand your presentation
Remember to –
Tell them what you're going to say
Say it
Tell them what you said