Bishop'S method ofstability analysis
OR
Effective Stress AnalysisbyBishop's Method
Inthe method of slices, the effect of the horizontal and shearing forces acting the
slices were neglected.
As a consequence, the factor of safety values obtained were conservative and may lead
touneconomical design, especially in the case ofdeep slip circles.
Bishop's method (1955) eliminates these errors to a large degree and provides more
accurate results. The analysis is based on the effective stress approach.
The shape of the slip surface is assumed to be circular.
His method also takes into account the pore pressure acting on the slice.
Let E, and Ent1 resultant horizontal forces on the
section n and n+1 respectively.
X,and Xt =resultant vertical shear forces
W= weight of theslice
P= total normal force acting on the base ofthe slice
S= Shear force acting at the base of theslice
Z= height oftheslice
l= length ofthe arc ab ofthe slice
b= horizontal width ofthe slice
= angle of the base ab of the slice with horizontal
OR angle between P and the vertical
x = horizontal distance of the slice from the centre of
the rotation
En
P
W
n+1
En+1
FIG. 23.23. BISHOP"S ANALYSIS.
Centre of
rolatkon
Total normal stress G on the base of the slice
F= (1)
Therefore,
I
Ifuis the pore pressure, the effective stress is
1
1
1
S=Tl.l
P
T=- c'+(o-u) tan ¢](3)
(2)
(Since, Shear strength =c+otan¢)
I- [c +G-u) tan¢](4)
Shear force acting on the base of the slice,
P
l.1
En
P
W
n+1
-En+1
FIG. 23.23. BISHOP'S ANALYSIS.
Centre of
rolatlon
For equilibrium,
Sliding moment = Restoring or resisting moment
Xw.x-)s.r-Xrlir
Or
Now from equation (4), which is as under:
1
W.x=)T.l.1.r
T= c +f-u)tan¢'] (49)
:. F=
Fz+6-u)cano
P
-2[cl +(P - u.l)tano']
F
XWx -Z[cl+ (P - u. )tao](5)
E,-
n
P
W
n+1
-En+1
FIG. 23.23. BISHOP'S ANALYSIS.
Centre of
rolatlon
Letthe normal effective force,
P=P- u.l.1= P- ul
Resolving the forces vertically,
W=Pcos +S sin (6)
(The vertical shear forces, X, and Xm are taken
to be equal and hence to be neutralizing each
other, the error from this assumption being
considered negligible).
Here P =P'+ul
Since, S=T1.1
From equation (4), which is as under:
1
T=c+G-)tan¢'] (4)
S= [cl+ P- ul)tan ]
1
F
-[cl+P'tan ¢']
E,
W
n+1
-En +1
FIG. 23.23. BISHOP"'S ANALYSIS.
Centre of
rolation
Substituting the values of P and S in equation (6),
which is as: W
=P cos +S sin 0 (6)
W= (P + ul)cose +
=P cos + ul. cos +
-p' (cose +
Therefore, P =
:. F=
XWx
c l.sin 0
(c l+P tan o )sin9
F
w-ucos04e
P tan sin0
+1(ucose + ina
cos9+
Weget, FEcl+
F
F
sin 0
tan D sin 8
Substituting the value of Pfor (P-ul) in equation (5), which is as:
F
cos +
Z[cl+ (P - u. )tano](5)
F
w-ucos 04C sin 91
F
tan 0 sin
F
tang' (7)
En
W
0
n+1
En+1
FIG. 23.23. BISHOP'S ANALYSIS.
Centre of
rolatlon
Substituting x=rsin., b = lcos0
The pore pressure ratio I,, for any slice is defined as
ub
F=
W
where z =
average height of a slice
Substituting the above values in equation (7), we get
1
Since, W (weight of slice) = yzb.1,
Therefore,
W
sinb2(c'b+W(1- n)tand')1+
seco
tane tanp
F
Since this equation contains F on both sides, the
solution should be one by trial and error.
E
W
n+1
-En+1
FIG. 23.23. BISHOP'S ANALYSIS,
Centre of
rolatlon
Methods of Improving Stability of Slopes
Theslopes which are susceptible to failure by sliding
can be improved and made safe either by reducing
the mass which may cause
use sliding or improve the
shear strength ofthe soil in the failure zone.
1. Geometrical Method
The changing of the slope angle from steep
slope to a gentle slope may increase the
stabilization of slope and the angle is
usually supported by grass bonding
together with soil.
Fig.1 Geometrical method grass bonding
Fig.2 Combination ofgeometrical method with gabion wall at the toe ofthe slopes.
2. Drainage Method
Saturation and pore water pressure building up in the subsoil causes slope failure.
Construction ofsurface drains minimize the building ofpore water pressure.
This method is very effective and easy to maintain the surface drains, but it is difficult to
maintain the subsoil drains.
Subsoil drain is mostly found in the retaining structure
as leak holes and cut off drain.
Itis capable of discharging more water during heavy
rain to avoid the effects of large amounts of water
absorption by the slope.
3. Retaining Structures Method
This method is generally more costly. However, due to its
flexibility in aconstrained site, it is mostly used.
The principle of this method is to use a
a retaining
structure to resist the downward forces of the soi mass.
Ground anchors or other tie back system may be used
together with the retaining structures if the driving
4. Grouting and injection of cement or other compounds into
specific zones help in increasing the stability ofslopes.
CementGrouting EpoxyInjection
RC Retaining Wall
forces are too large to resist.
5. Upstrcam and downstream slope protection
Upstream slope of earth dam is protected against the erosive action of waves by stone
pitching or by stone dumping.
The thickness of the dumped rock should be about 1 m, and should be placed over a
gravel filter of about 0.3 m thickness.
Downstream slope protection
Downstream of slope 1 also
protected in similar manner.
In addition, downstream should be
provided berm at suitable
interval (about 15 m) to intercept
drain water and discharge safely.
Grass, and plants should be
planted soon after the construction
of earth dam.
Dumped stone
called rip rap
Concrete
toe wallI
1m
0.3 m
Filter in 3 layers
(lowest size i.e.
Badarpur at
bottom and
gravel at top)
Fig. 14.19. Upstream slope protection
of Earthen dams.

BISHOP'S METHOD in trsdxvbvfvbb. Fggvbhffv

  • 1.
    Bishop'S method ofstabilityanalysis OR Effective Stress AnalysisbyBishop's Method Inthe method of slices, the effect of the horizontal and shearing forces acting the slices were neglected. As a consequence, the factor of safety values obtained were conservative and may lead touneconomical design, especially in the case ofdeep slip circles. Bishop's method (1955) eliminates these errors to a large degree and provides more accurate results. The analysis is based on the effective stress approach. The shape of the slip surface is assumed to be circular. His method also takes into account the pore pressure acting on the slice.
  • 2.
    Let E, andEnt1 resultant horizontal forces on the section n and n+1 respectively. X,and Xt =resultant vertical shear forces W= weight of theslice P= total normal force acting on the base ofthe slice S= Shear force acting at the base of theslice Z= height oftheslice l= length ofthe arc ab ofthe slice b= horizontal width ofthe slice = angle of the base ab of the slice with horizontal OR angle between P and the vertical x = horizontal distance of the slice from the centre of the rotation En P W n+1 En+1 FIG. 23.23. BISHOP"S ANALYSIS. Centre of rolatkon
  • 3.
    Total normal stressG on the base of the slice F= (1) Therefore, I Ifuis the pore pressure, the effective stress is 1 1 1 S=Tl.l P T=- c'+(o-u) tan ¢](3) (2) (Since, Shear strength =c+otan¢) I- [c +G-u) tan¢](4) Shear force acting on the base of the slice, P l.1 En P W n+1 -En+1 FIG. 23.23. BISHOP'S ANALYSIS. Centre of rolatlon
  • 4.
    For equilibrium, Sliding moment= Restoring or resisting moment Xw.x-)s.r-Xrlir Or Now from equation (4), which is as under: 1 W.x=)T.l.1.r T= c +f-u)tan¢'] (49) :. F= Fz+6-u)cano P -2[cl +(P - u.l)tano'] F XWx -Z[cl+ (P - u. )tao](5) E,- n P W n+1 -En+1 FIG. 23.23. BISHOP'S ANALYSIS. Centre of rolatlon
  • 5.
    Letthe normal effectiveforce, P=P- u.l.1= P- ul Resolving the forces vertically, W=Pcos +S sin (6) (The vertical shear forces, X, and Xm are taken to be equal and hence to be neutralizing each other, the error from this assumption being considered negligible). Here P =P'+ul Since, S=T1.1 From equation (4), which is as under: 1 T=c+G-)tan¢'] (4) S= [cl+ P- ul)tan ] 1 F -[cl+P'tan ¢'] E, W n+1 -En +1 FIG. 23.23. BISHOP"'S ANALYSIS. Centre of rolation
  • 6.
    Substituting the valuesof P and S in equation (6), which is as: W =P cos +S sin 0 (6) W= (P + ul)cose + =P cos + ul. cos + -p' (cose + Therefore, P = :. F= XWx c l.sin 0 (c l+P tan o )sin9 F w-ucos04e P tan sin0 +1(ucose + ina cos9+ Weget, FEcl+ F F sin 0 tan D sin 8 Substituting the value of Pfor (P-ul) in equation (5), which is as: F cos + Z[cl+ (P - u. )tano](5) F w-ucos 04C sin 91 F tan 0 sin F tang' (7) En W 0 n+1 En+1 FIG. 23.23. BISHOP'S ANALYSIS. Centre of rolatlon
  • 7.
    Substituting x=rsin., b= lcos0 The pore pressure ratio I,, for any slice is defined as ub F= W where z = average height of a slice Substituting the above values in equation (7), we get 1 Since, W (weight of slice) = yzb.1, Therefore, W sinb2(c'b+W(1- n)tand')1+ seco tane tanp F Since this equation contains F on both sides, the solution should be one by trial and error. E W n+1 -En+1 FIG. 23.23. BISHOP'S ANALYSIS, Centre of rolatlon
  • 8.
    Methods of ImprovingStability of Slopes Theslopes which are susceptible to failure by sliding can be improved and made safe either by reducing the mass which may cause use sliding or improve the shear strength ofthe soil in the failure zone. 1. Geometrical Method The changing of the slope angle from steep slope to a gentle slope may increase the stabilization of slope and the angle is usually supported by grass bonding together with soil. Fig.1 Geometrical method grass bonding Fig.2 Combination ofgeometrical method with gabion wall at the toe ofthe slopes.
  • 9.
    2. Drainage Method Saturationand pore water pressure building up in the subsoil causes slope failure. Construction ofsurface drains minimize the building ofpore water pressure. This method is very effective and easy to maintain the surface drains, but it is difficult to maintain the subsoil drains. Subsoil drain is mostly found in the retaining structure as leak holes and cut off drain. Itis capable of discharging more water during heavy rain to avoid the effects of large amounts of water absorption by the slope.
  • 10.
    3. Retaining StructuresMethod This method is generally more costly. However, due to its flexibility in aconstrained site, it is mostly used. The principle of this method is to use a a retaining structure to resist the downward forces of the soi mass. Ground anchors or other tie back system may be used together with the retaining structures if the driving 4. Grouting and injection of cement or other compounds into specific zones help in increasing the stability ofslopes. CementGrouting EpoxyInjection RC Retaining Wall forces are too large to resist.
  • 11.
    5. Upstrcam anddownstream slope protection Upstream slope of earth dam is protected against the erosive action of waves by stone pitching or by stone dumping. The thickness of the dumped rock should be about 1 m, and should be placed over a gravel filter of about 0.3 m thickness. Downstream slope protection Downstream of slope 1 also protected in similar manner. In addition, downstream should be provided berm at suitable interval (about 15 m) to intercept drain water and discharge safely. Grass, and plants should be planted soon after the construction of earth dam. Dumped stone called rip rap Concrete toe wallI 1m 0.3 m Filter in 3 layers (lowest size i.e. Badarpur at bottom and gravel at top) Fig. 14.19. Upstream slope protection of Earthen dams.