The Role of Modeled Available
Groundwater in Local Regulation
and State Planning
Presented By Bill Mullican, PG.,
to the
2015 Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts
Groundwater Summit
San Marcos, Texas
9
How many major
aquifers have
been designated
in Texas?
199,000,000,000,000,001
According to a recent
scientific study published by
Johnson, McCarthy, and
Jones, what is the volume of
groundwater, in AFY,
available in Texas today?
6
How many acronyms using the letters A, G,
and M can be utilized based on TWC Chapter
36?
GAM – Groundwater Availability Model
GMA – Groundwater Management Area
MAG – Modeled Available Groundwater
MGA – Modeled Groundwater Applications
AGM – Approved Groundwater Model, and
AMG – Attorneys for Modeled Groundwater
16 Planning Regions
11
Three Texas Water Plans Published since SB 1 in 1997
Six prior to SB 1 (1961, 1968, 1984, 1990, 1992, and 1997)
Texas Water Code Chapter 16.053 (e) & (2-a)
(e) Each regional water planning group shall submit to the
development board a regional water plan that:
(2-a) is consistent with the desired future conditions adopted
under Section 36.108 for the relevant aquifers located in the
regional water planning area as of the date the board most
recently adopted a state water plan under Section 16.051 or, at
the option of the regional water planning group, established
subsequent to the adoption of the most recent plan.
31 Texas Administrative Code Chapter 357.32 (d)
RWPGs shall use modeled available groundwater volumes for
groundwater availability, as issued by the Board, and incorporate
such information in its RWP unless no modeled available
groundwater volumes are provided. Groundwater availability
used in the RWP must be consistent with the desired future
conditions as of the date the Board most recently adopted a
state water plan or, at the discretion of the RWPG, established
subsequent to the adoption of the most recent state water plan.
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Years
Scenario 1 - Drought Demands vs. MAGS
Drought Water Demand
Average Historical Use
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
Scenario 2 - Pumping + New Strategy
vs. MAG
Pumping Strategy
MAG = 10,000 AFY • Pumping in Year 1
starts at 5,500 AFY
and increases at a
rate of 100 AFY for
50 years
• WMS = 1,000 AFY
pumping starting in
Year 1
• MAG = 10,000 AFY
• Total pumping +
WMS =447,500
• Excess MAG =
47,500 AF.
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
Scenario 2 - Cumulative MAG vs
Cumulative Pumping + WMS
Cumulative MAG Cumulative Pumping + WMS

Bill mullican

  • 1.
    The Role ofModeled Available Groundwater in Local Regulation and State Planning Presented By Bill Mullican, PG., to the 2015 Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts Groundwater Summit San Marcos, Texas
  • 4.
  • 5.
    How many major aquifershave been designated in Texas?
  • 6.
  • 7.
    According to arecent scientific study published by Johnson, McCarthy, and Jones, what is the volume of groundwater, in AFY, available in Texas today?
  • 8.
  • 9.
    How many acronymsusing the letters A, G, and M can be utilized based on TWC Chapter 36? GAM – Groundwater Availability Model GMA – Groundwater Management Area MAG – Modeled Available Groundwater MGA – Modeled Groundwater Applications AGM – Approved Groundwater Model, and AMG – Attorneys for Modeled Groundwater
  • 10.
  • 11.
    11 Three Texas WaterPlans Published since SB 1 in 1997 Six prior to SB 1 (1961, 1968, 1984, 1990, 1992, and 1997)
  • 12.
    Texas Water CodeChapter 16.053 (e) & (2-a) (e) Each regional water planning group shall submit to the development board a regional water plan that: (2-a) is consistent with the desired future conditions adopted under Section 36.108 for the relevant aquifers located in the regional water planning area as of the date the board most recently adopted a state water plan under Section 16.051 or, at the option of the regional water planning group, established subsequent to the adoption of the most recent plan.
  • 13.
    31 Texas AdministrativeCode Chapter 357.32 (d) RWPGs shall use modeled available groundwater volumes for groundwater availability, as issued by the Board, and incorporate such information in its RWP unless no modeled available groundwater volumes are provided. Groundwater availability used in the RWP must be consistent with the desired future conditions as of the date the Board most recently adopted a state water plan or, at the discretion of the RWPG, established subsequent to the adoption of the most recent state water plan.
  • 14.
    0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 1 2 34 5 6 7 8 9 10 Years Scenario 1 - Drought Demands vs. MAGS Drought Water Demand Average Historical Use
  • 15.
    0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 1 2 34 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Scenario 2 - Pumping + New Strategy vs. MAG Pumping Strategy MAG = 10,000 AFY • Pumping in Year 1 starts at 5,500 AFY and increases at a rate of 100 AFY for 50 years • WMS = 1,000 AFY pumping starting in Year 1 • MAG = 10,000 AFY • Total pumping + WMS =447,500 • Excess MAG = 47,500 AF.
  • 16.
    0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 1 2 34 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Scenario 2 - Cumulative MAG vs Cumulative Pumping + WMS Cumulative MAG Cumulative Pumping + WMS