Be sure to analyze the cost differences as well as other differences in the proposal. Required: Create a scorecard using at least five criteria (must include cost and savings as two of the criteria ) to aid in the analysis. Provide an explanation of why you chose the criteria you chose and why you used the weights you chose (why is one criteria more or less important than others). You are allowed to make assumptions but clearly state your assumptions. Required: Provide an explanation of why you selected the solution that you recommended. Use the table below as guidance. The scores should be out of 100 and the weights should add up to 1. Table 1 : Scorecard for XYZ Corp . Criteria Score Weight Total Cost 85 0.30 25.5 Savings 88 0.25 22 Criteria 3 95 0.15 14.25 Criteria 4 100 0.15 15 Criteria 5 80 0.15 12 Final Score 88.75 Criteria Score Weight Total Cost 85 0.30 25.5 Savings 88 0.25 22 Criteria 3 95 0.15 14.25 Criteria 4 100 0.15 15 Criteria 5 80 0.15 12 Final Score 88.75 Criteria Score Weight Total Cost 85 0.30 25.5 Savings 88 0.25 22 Criteria 3 95 0.15 14.25 Criteria 4 100 0.15 15 Criteria 5 80 0.15 12 Final Score 88.75 In late Nowbater, Ms. Elaine Taylor, Girsctar of upe andy the eperatian of the city-ewnsd old-age bome. ply for the city of Winuton, wal seviewing propole. Mk. Trylor isew that her necemmentations for selesfor the Carion Manor stady. Three comalting groupn boe of a consaltaat wield have to be completed by hat responded to a request for proposat (RFir) be CARSON MANOR PURCHASING AND SUPPLY Carson Manor was epened about 30 yean ago for pers. DIVISION (PSD) taif and the Canon Mios Comnithe of Minagenent isg, and Dispoul. final appoval. Bu Baine Taybor becane firector of PSD Ino yras ago at M. R. Hollvight, and dealt diferely withober departmeatind EXHIBIT 2 Carus Manor Chapter 6 Nend identification and Specificatian 157 Eicerpts from "The Municipal Home for the Aged, a Review and Altecnatves." A sepont to the Carson Manor Commitree of Management by I Peterson, City Adminstrator, and H. Davis, Orector of Social Services Page 25 : increasing leves of care requered by Carson Mancr residents have a major intluence on coss, since care essentialy is transiated into staff to provide the necesary services No objective ciassification of resideat care fequiements has ever been carred out at the Carson Manor although there is no question that curtent. residents and even new applicants require much more nurang care than was formedy the case. Page 33 An operational review could be camied out by an ndependent cansulting firm of the State's Department of Community and Socal Senices and would provide a thorough analyss of options and posstle areas tor improvement at the Carson Manot. Such an approech would provide e fim basi for the developrrent of strategies for operationar change but would not guarantee implementation of the necesiacy changes. Page 34 The cuerall advantage of an opecational revew would be the abiity to idently, in depth, prob.

1. Be sure to analyze the cost differences as well as other differences in the proposal.
Required: Create a scorecard using at least five criteria (must include cost and savings as two of the
criteria ) to aid in the analysis. Provide an explanation of why you chose the criteria you chose and why
you used the weights you chose (why is one criteria more or less important than others). You are allowed
to make assumptions but clearly state your assumptions.
Required: Provide an explanation of why you selected the solution that you recommended.
Use the table below as guidance. The scores should be out of 100 and the weights should add up to 1.
Table 1 : Scorecard for XYZ Corp .
Criteria Score Weight Total
Cost 85 0.30 25.5
Savings 88 0.25 22
Criteria 3 95 0.15 14.25
Criteria 4 100 0.15 15
Criteria 5 80 0.15 12
Final Score 88.75
Criteria
Score
Weight
Total
Cost
85
0.30
25.5
Savings
88
0.25
22
Criteria 3
95
0.15
14.25
Criteria 4
100
0.15
15
Criteria 5
80
0.15
12
Final Score
88.75
Criteria Score Weight Total
Cost 85 0.30 25.5
Savings 88 0.25 22
Criteria 3 95 0.15 14.25

2. Criteria 4 100 0.15 15
Criteria 5 80 0.15 12
Final Score 88.75
In late Nowbater, Ms. Elaine Taylor, Girsctar of upe andy the eperatian of the city-ewnsd old-age
bome. ply for the city of Winuton, wal seviewing propole. Mk. Trylor isew that her
necemmentations for selesfor the Carion Manor stady. Three comalting groupn boe of a
consaltaat wield have to be completed by hat responded to a request for proposat (RFir) be
CARSON MANOR PURCHASING AND SUPPLY Carson Manor was epened about 30 yean
ago for pers. DIVISION (PSD) taif and the Canon Mios Comnithe of Minagenent isg, and
Dispoul. final appoval. Bu Baine Taybor becane firector of PSD Ino yras ago at M. R. Hollvight,
and dealt diferely withober departmeatind EXHIBIT 2 Carus Manor Chapter 6 Nend
identification and Specificatian 157 Eicerpts from "The Municipal Home for the Aged, a Review
and Altecnatves." A sepont to the Carson Manor Commitree of Management by I Peterson, City
Adminstrator, and H. Davis, Orector of Social Services Page 25 : increasing leves of care
requered by Carson Mancr residents have a major intluence on coss, since care essentialy is
transiated into staff to provide the necesary services No objective ciassification of resideat care
fequiements has ever been carred out at the Carson Manor although there is no question that
curtent. residents and even new applicants require much more nurang care than was formedy the
case. Page 33 An operational review could be camied out by an ndependent cansulting firm of
the State's Department of Community and Socal Senices and would provide a thorough analyss
of options and posstle areas tor improvement at the Carson Manot. Such an approech would
provide e fim basi for the developrrent of strategies for operationar change but would not
guarantee implementation of the necesiacy changes. Page 34 The cuerall advantage of an
opecational revew would be the abiity to idently, in depth, probien areas at the Carson Manor for
which change suraseges could be developed by the oty Such stateges might indude contract
management of a specilic service, for rample. The type of anatyis would provide sold ground for
furure planning On the negatwe sed of the balance are the costs of such a study and the necessity
to wubsequenty dewlog and inpienent changes for the identificd problem areas perbed hasis. The
report highlighted the diffcusies of cou per bed nat cort boubat. Cay cowntal fai inar the
eminended an epenitional miew by an outside ageacy privately net ins andecturily high when
congared to and outlined sombe general guidelines and objecthwe. birscted die cay admisistrator.
Mr. Perenoe, and the lines and ebjeceives, are shaw a in Echibit 2. Lirectar of social senices, Mr.
Davis, to prepare a rpoit Council aceepted ihe mepart's netomaneadations and for subenision to
the Carice Maner Camnitlee of Man: directed Mewas. Petenon asd Danis fo initiate an inde:
agonent in early June. The iepont wat to coatain: genteat consultaed's stady of Canen Manor.
This was 1. An analyuis of the comperative soses at Carnos Manir oot a bedgeted expenie and
the approval of the CMCM, and ober mabe facilities. 2. A eviqu of the feaviblity of incrowing
cont efficiesy. Cobtrol, and City Council weese necesury prier to let3. A miew of the ieplicuiots
of positile alkematives ting a conseltiog contrit. Mr. Davis requeted the Ash as: 2. Contret
masagemem ing and evaluatine potetial aboly participants. Elaine b. An io-degeh operational
seview and cont effeiency Taylor handied the Canon Manor Stady pervonally. stady canied out
by as edemal agency. Thereumested intemerienee of her buyen. She drafted an RFP, which The
requested inteemal report, tisted "The Carnon Manor it show in Exhibit J. In-vase conalting
arganizations for the Aged, = Roview aed Aliernatives." was tabled were contacted abd a lis of
coesultieg coerpaaies with EXHIEIT 3 Meequrst for Prepesal You are invited to submt a
proposal for the purpose of conducting an adminstatint and coerasconal rniew of the Camon
Manor for elder cibizero. The review is to incude al aspects of operation at the honte, noloding.

3. but not sestricted to, asesiment of resedent care seourements, invew of adminstrison, orgationons
desigr, and statting The main sectons of the home include laundy and housekeping. nunng and p
iothesapy, detary, specul servces, propery, bulding inartmance. and admenstration. The iniew is
to be conducted by examination ind adrmanittration. On the basis of the revied, you are so
deviog comprohersme incominendatens ler introducng in prowed operating and cost efficiencies
for the futiare ceseation of the home. All recommendations should offer alteinatyes, identify
saveros to be achieved and the welated cost in order to impiement the incomeneo. dations,
propected mpact on qatt and admunistation and stratigis for molementason that are coesuteet wht
the cily's role as optraton of the home. as well as provisons for ensung the numberance of the
curtemt quality of care. it is our intent that the cost of the mrew and subseguest inglemengation
of the iecommenduboes as io be recorered trom savings achiewed in the coeratons of the home.
Your Proposal is to include the following Informatioe a. Proposed methodology for urelertaking
the resiew b. Names and qualfications of persons to be involwed in the revirw and developenent
of sicuequert recommendabons. c. An estimase of the time requied to undertaie the invew mad
develog the recomithendations d. Docimentation and celerences demonstrating vour abily to
successi aly imolement recommendabons in sainilar circimatances. e. Potentiel cost harings that
mary be achieved as a result of the neview: f. A copy of any contracts or agreements that are to
be entered into is a nesut of beeng setared to con. dust the review. It is to be noted that your ice
structure including uoset limts a to be idenailed yeparately howeved. included in the operating
cost, caiculations wht the shving are to be shown as at net amount Felevan rxperimase wat
developed. Five cotweltiag companies were invited to vatvit propesals. sulaing oompatict sent
aepresentatives for prelimiuary it. spections of Carwon Manor and for infoemal disorident of the
squpe, iernt of refereace, and evaluation crikecia to he used in the peopocil evaluatioe. Thee
pooposals neme unheieted by closing, 00 November 17, with the follow ing cont brealdown. wh
the RFP. by Deceater 19, jrier as acelity aypoival af the varian buensirest of elscted efficiels.
Chapter 6 Need Identification and Speofication 159 160 Purchasing and Jupply Management
EXHIEIT 4 Proposals for Carsoe Mlaner lieview (Catriamed)