SlideShare a Scribd company logo
SORT CASES BY Practice.
SPLIT FILE SEPARATE BY Practice.
EXAMINE VARIABLES=Comprehension BY Noise
/PLOT NPPLOT
/STATISTICS DESCRIPTIVES
/CINTERVAL 95
/MISSING LISTWISE
/NOTOTAL.
Explore
Notes
Output Created 19-DEC-2021 16:22:13
Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet0
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File Practice
N of Rows in Working
Data File
30
Missing Value
Handling
Definition of Missing User-defined missing
values for dependent
variables are treated as
missing.
Cases Used Statistics are based on
cases with no missing
values for any
dependent variable or
factor used.
Syntax EXAMINE
VARIABLES=Comprehe
nsion BY Noise
/PLOT NPPLOT
/STATISTICS
DESCRIPTIVES
/CINTERVAL 95
/MISSING LISTWISE
/NOTOTAL.
Resources Processor Time 00:00:04.69
Elapsed Time 00:00:05.78
[DataSet0]
Practice = No practice
Level of background
Case Processing Summarya
Level of
background
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Reading
comprehension
No noice 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 5 100.0%
Low noice 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 5 100.0%
High noice 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 5 100.0%
a. Practice = No practice
Descriptivesa
Level of background Statistic Std. Error
Reading
comprehension
No noice Mean 13.80 .663
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Lower Bound 11.96
Upper Bound 15.64
5% Trimmed Mean 13.78
Median 14.00
Variance 2.200
Std. Deviation 1.483
Minimum 12
Maximum 16
Range 4
Interquartile Range 3
Skewness .552 .913
Kurtosis .868 2.000
Low noice Mean 12.60 .600
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Lower Bound 10.93
Upper Bound 14.27
5% Trimmed Mean 12.61
Median 12.00
Variance 1.800
Std. Deviation 1.342
Minimum 11
Maximum 14
Range 3
Interquartile Range 3
Skewness .166 .913
Kurtosis -2.407 2.000
High noice Mean 11.40 .872
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Lower Bound 8.98
Upper Bound 13.82
5% Trimmed Mean 11.39
Median 12.00
Variance 3.800
Std. Deviation 1.949
Minimum 9
Maximum 14
Range 5
Interquartile Range 4
Skewness .081 .913
Kurtosis -.817 2.000
a. Practice = No practice
Tests of Normalitya
Level of
background
Kolmogorov-Smirnovb Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Reading
comprehension
No noice .246 5 .200* .956 5 .777
Low noice .273 5 .200* .852 5 .201
High noice .221 5 .200* .953 5 .758
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Practice = No practice
b. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Reading comprehension
Normal Q-Q Plots
Detrended Normal Q-Q Plots
Practice = Practice
Level of background
Case Processing Summarya
Level of
background
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Reading
comprehension
No noice 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 5 100.0%
Low noice 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 5 100.0%
High noice 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 5 100.0%
a. Practice = Practice
Descriptivesa
Level of background Statistic Std. Error
Reading
comprehension
No noice Mean 18.00 .548
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Lower Bound 16.48
Upper Bound 19.52
5% Trimmed Mean 17.94
Median 18.00
Variance 1.500
Std. Deviation 1.225
Minimum 17
Maximum 20
Range 3
Interquartile Range 2
Skewness 1.361 .913
Kurtosis 2.000 2.000
Low noice Mean 16.80 .583
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Lower Bound 15.18
Upper Bound 18.42
5% Trimmed Mean 16.83
Median 17.00
Variance 1.700
Std. Deviation 1.304
Minimum 15
Maximum 18
Range 3
Interquartile Range 3
Skewness -.541 .913
Kurtosis -1.488 2.000
High noice Mean 12.20 .917
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Lower Bound 9.66
Upper Bound 14.74
5% Trimmed Mean 12.22
Median 13.00
Variance 4.200
Std. Deviation 2.049
Minimum 10
Maximum 14
Range 4
Interquartile Range 4
Skewness -.441 .913
Kurtosis -3.163 2.000
a. Practice = Practice
Tests of Normalitya
Level of
background
Kolmogorov-Smirnovb Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Reading
comprehension
No noice .300 5 .161 .833 5 .146
Low noice .221 5 .200* .902 5 .421
High noice .258 5 .200* .782 5 .057
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Practice = Practice
b. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Reading comprehension
Normal Q-Q Plots
Detrended Normal Q-Q Plots
SPLIT FILE OFF.
DATASET ACTIVATE DataSet0.
UNIANOVA Comprehension BY Practice Noise
/METHOD=SSTYPE(3)
/INTERCEPT=INCLUDE
/PLOT=PROFILE(Practice*Noise) TYPE=LINE ERRORBAR=NO MEANREFERENCE=NO YAXIS=AUTO
/EMMEANS=TABLES(Practice) COMPARE ADJ(LSD)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(Noise) COMPARE ADJ(LSD)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(Practice*Noise) COMPARE(Practice)/EMMEANS=TABLES(Practice*Noise)
COMPARE(Noise)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(Practice*Noise)
/PRINT ETASQ DESCRIPTIVE HOMOGENEITY
/CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05)
/DESIGN=Practice Noise Practice*Noise.
Univariate Analysis of Variance
Notes
Output Created 19-DEC-2021 16:51:43
Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet0
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working
Data File
30
Missing Value
Handling
Definition of Missing User-defined missing
values are treated as
missing.
Cases Used Statistics are based on
all cases with valid data
for all variables in the
model.
Syntax UNIANOVA
Comprehension BY
Practice Noise
/METHOD=SSTYPE(3)
/INTERCEPT=INCLUDE
/PLOT=PROFILE(Practi
ce*Noise) TYPE=LINE
ERRORBAR=NO
MEANREFERENCE=N
O YAXIS=AUTO
/EMMEANS=TABLES(Pr
actice) COMPARE
ADJ(LSD)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(N
oise) COMPARE
ADJ(LSD)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(Pr
actice*Noise)
COMPARE(Practice)/EM
MEANS=TABLES(Practi
ce*Noise)
COMPARE(Noise)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(Pr
actice*Noise)
/PRINT ETASQ
DESCRIPTIVE
HOMOGENEITY
/CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05)
/DESIGN=Practice
Noise Practice*Noise.
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.61
Elapsed Time 00:00:00.70
Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label N
Practice 0 No practice 15
1 Practice 15
Level of
background
0 No noice 10
1 Low noice 10
2 High noice 10
Descriptive Statistics
Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension
Practice
Level of
background Mean
Std.
Deviation N
No practice No noice 13.80 1.483 5
Low noice 12.60 1.342 5
High noice 11.40 1.949 5
Total 12.60 1.805 15
Practice No noice 18.00 1.225 5
Low noice 16.80 1.304 5
High noice 12.20 2.049 5
Total 15.67 2.968 15
Total No noice 15.90 2.558 10
Low noice 14.70 2.541 10
High noice 11.80 1.932 10
Total 14.13 2.874 30
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa,b
Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
Reading
comprehension
Based on Mean 1.127 5 24 .373
Based on Median .400 5 24 .844
Based on Median and
with adjusted df
.400 5 20.061 .843
Based on trimmed
mean
1.107 5 24 .383
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across
groups.
a. Dependent variable: Reading comprehension
b. Design: Intercept + Practice + Noise + Practice * Noise
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Partial Eta
Squared
Corrected
Model
178.667a 5 35.733 14.105 .000 .746
Intercept 5992.533 1 5992.533 2365.474 .000 .990
Practice 70.533 1 70.533 27.842 .000 .537
Noise 88.867 2 44.433 17.539 .000 .594
Practice * Noise 19.267 2 9.633 3.803 .037 .241
Error 60.800 24 2.533
Total 6232.000 30
Corrected Total 239.467 29
a. R Squared = .746 (Adjusted R Squared = .693)
Estimated Marginal Means
1. Practice
Estimates
Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension
Practice Mean Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
No practice 12.600 .411 11.752 13.448
Practice 15.667 .411 14.818 16.515
Pairwise Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension
(I) Practice (J) Practice
Mean
Difference (I-
J) Std. Error Sig.b
95% Confidence Interval for
Differenceb
Lower Bound Upper Bound
No practice Practice -3.067* .581 .000 -4.266 -1.867
Practice No practice 3.067* .581 .000 1.867 4.266
Based on estimated marginal means
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
b. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Least Significant Difference (equivalent to no
adjustments).
Univariate Tests
Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension
Sum of
Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Partial Eta
Squared
Contrast 70.533 1 70.533 27.842 .000 .537
Error 60.800 24 2.533
The F tests the effect of Practice. This test is based on the linearly independent
pairwise comparisons among the estimated marginal means.
2. Level of background
Estimates
Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension
Level of
background Mean Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
No noice 15.900 .503 14.861 16.939
Low noice 14.700 .503 13.661 15.739
High noice 11.800 .503 10.761 12.839
Pairwise Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension
(I) Level of
background
(J) Level of
background
Mean
Difference (I-
J) Std. Error Sig.b
95% Confidence Interval for
Differenceb
Lower Bound Upper Bound
No noice Low noice 1.200 .712 .105 -.269 2.669
High noice 4.100* .712 .000 2.631 5.569
Low noice No noice -1.200 .712 .105 -2.669 .269
High noice 2.900* .712 .000 1.431 4.369
High noice No noice -4.100* .712 .000 -5.569 -2.631
Low noice -2.900* .712 .000 -4.369 -1.431
Based on estimated marginal means
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
b. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Least Significant Difference (equivalent to no adjustments).
Univariate Tests
Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension
Sum of
Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Partial Eta
Squared
Contrast 88.867 2 44.433 17.539 .000 .594
Error 60.800 24 2.533
The F tests the effect of Level of background. This test is based on the linearly
independent pairwise comparisons among the estimated marginal means.
3. Practice * Level of background
Estimates
Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension
Practice
Level of
background Mean Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
No practice No noice 13.800 .712 12.331 15.269
Low noice 12.600 .712 11.131 14.069
High noice 11.400 .712 9.931 12.869
Practice No noice 18.000 .712 16.531 19.469
Low noice 16.800 .712 15.331 18.269
High noice 12.200 .712 10.731 13.669
Pairwise Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension
Level of
background (I) Practice (J) Practice
Mean
Difference (I-
J) Std. Error Sig.b
95% Confidence Interval for
Differenceb
Lower Bound Upper Bound
No noice No practice Practice -4.200* 1.007 .000 -6.278 -2.122
Practice No practice 4.200* 1.007 .000 2.122 6.278
Low noice No practice Practice -4.200* 1.007 .000 -6.278 -2.122
Practice No practice 4.200* 1.007 .000 2.122 6.278
High noice No practice Practice -.800 1.007 .435 -2.878 1.278
Practice No practice .800 1.007 .435 -1.278 2.878
Based on estimated marginal means
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
b. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Least Significant Difference (equivalent to no adjustments).
Univariate Tests
Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension
Level of background
Sum of
Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Partial Eta
Squared
No noice Contrast 44.100 1 44.100 17.408 .000 .420
Error 60.800 24 2.533
Low noice Contrast 44.100 1 44.100 17.408 .000 .420
Error 60.800 24 2.533
High noice Contrast 1.600 1 1.600 .632 .435 .026
Error 60.800 24 2.533
Each F tests the simple effects of Practice within each level combination of the other effects shown.
These tests are based on the linearly independent pairwise comparisons among the estimated
marginal means.
4. Practice * Level of background
Estimates
Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension
Practice
Level of
background Mean Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
No practice No noice 13.800 .712 12.331 15.269
Low noice 12.600 .712 11.131 14.069
High noice 11.400 .712 9.931 12.869
Practice No noice 18.000 .712 16.531 19.469
Low noice 16.800 .712 15.331 18.269
High noice 12.200 .712 10.731 13.669
Pairwise Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension
Practice
(I) Level of
background
(J) Level of
background
Mean
Difference (I-
J) Std. Error Sig.b
95% Confidence Interval for
Differenceb
Lower Bound Upper Bound
No practice No noice Low noice 1.200 1.007 .245 -.878 3.278
High noice 2.400* 1.007 .025 .322 4.478
Low noice No noice -1.200 1.007 .245 -3.278 .878
High noice 1.200 1.007 .245 -.878 3.278
High noice No noice -2.400* 1.007 .025 -4.478 -.322
Low noice -1.200 1.007 .245 -3.278 .878
Practice No noice Low noice 1.200 1.007 .245 -.878 3.278
High noice 5.800* 1.007 .000 3.722 7.878
Low noice No noice -1.200 1.007 .245 -3.278 .878
High noice 4.600* 1.007 .000 2.522 6.678
High noice No noice -5.800* 1.007 .000 -7.878 -3.722
Low noice -4.600* 1.007 .000 -6.678 -2.522
Based on estimated marginal means
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
b. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Least Significant Difference (equivalent to no adjustments).
Univariate Tests
Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension
Practice
Sum of
Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Partial Eta
Squared
No practice Contrast 14.400 2 7.200 2.842 .078 .191
Error 60.800 24 2.533
Practice Contrast 93.733 2 46.867 18.500 .000 .607
Error 60.800 24 2.533
Each F tests the simple effects of Level of background within each level combination of the other
effects shown. These tests are based on the linearly independent pairwise comparisons among the
estimated marginal means.
5. Practice * Level of background
Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension
Practice
Level of
background Mean Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
No practice No noice 13.800 .712 12.331 15.269
Low noice 12.600 .712 11.131 14.069
High noice 11.400 .712 9.931 12.869
Practice No noice 18.000 .712 16.531 19.469
Low noice 16.800 .712 15.331 18.269
High noice 12.200 .712 10.731 13.669
Profile Plots

More Related Content

Similar to Bab 8

How to use statistica for rsm study
How to use statistica for rsm studyHow to use statistica for rsm study
How to use statistica for rsm study
Wan Nor Nadyaini Wan Omar
 
Tugas quiz SPSS
Tugas quiz SPSSTugas quiz SPSS
Tugas quiz SPSS
Yunus Moslem
 
Friedman-SPSS.docx
Friedman-SPSS.docxFriedman-SPSS.docx
Friedman-SPSS.docx
drsaravanan1977
 
Decision tree learning
Decision tree learningDecision tree learning
Decision tree learning
Dr. Radhey Shyam
 
A sample of adults with hearing aids were randomly assigned to one o.pdf
A sample of adults with hearing aids were randomly assigned to one o.pdfA sample of adults with hearing aids were randomly assigned to one o.pdf
A sample of adults with hearing aids were randomly assigned to one o.pdf
kostikjaylonshaewe47
 
RDataMining slides-regression-classification
RDataMining slides-regression-classificationRDataMining slides-regression-classification
RDataMining slides-regression-classification
Yanchang Zhao
 
Week8 livelecture2010 follow_up
Week8 livelecture2010 follow_upWeek8 livelecture2010 follow_up
Week8 livelecture2010 follow_up
Brent Heard
 
Module 5 lecture_4_final
Module 5 lecture_4_finalModule 5 lecture_4_final
Module 5 lecture_4_final
Amol Wadghule
 
IGARSSWellLog_Vancouver_07_29.pptx
IGARSSWellLog_Vancouver_07_29.pptxIGARSSWellLog_Vancouver_07_29.pptx
IGARSSWellLog_Vancouver_07_29.pptxgrssieee
 
An Introduction to boosting
An Introduction to boostingAn Introduction to boosting
An Introduction to boostingbutest
 
236628934.pdf
236628934.pdf236628934.pdf
236628934.pdf
KishoreAjayKumarAyya
 
19 9742 the application paper id 0016(edit ty)
19 9742 the application paper id 0016(edit ty)19 9742 the application paper id 0016(edit ty)
19 9742 the application paper id 0016(edit ty)
IAESIJEECS
 
Diploma sem 2 applied science physics-unit 1-chap 2 error s
Diploma sem 2 applied science physics-unit 1-chap 2 error sDiploma sem 2 applied science physics-unit 1-chap 2 error s
Diploma sem 2 applied science physics-unit 1-chap 2 error s
Rai University
 
Monte Carlo Methods 2017 July Talk in Montreal
Monte Carlo Methods 2017 July Talk in MontrealMonte Carlo Methods 2017 July Talk in Montreal
Monte Carlo Methods 2017 July Talk in Montreal
Fred J. Hickernell
 
Quantitative Analysis for Emperical Research
Quantitative Analysis for Emperical ResearchQuantitative Analysis for Emperical Research
Quantitative Analysis for Emperical Research
Amit Kamble
 
NOTE STATISTIC BA301
NOTE STATISTIC BA301NOTE STATISTIC BA301
NOTE STATISTIC BA301faijmsk
 
Erning spss baru sekali
Erning spss baru sekaliErning spss baru sekali
Erning spss baru sekali
ERNING KAROMAH
 
Interpreting Logistic Regression.pptx
Interpreting Logistic Regression.pptxInterpreting Logistic Regression.pptx
Interpreting Logistic Regression.pptx
GairuzazmiMGhani
 
Week8 Live Lecture for Final Exam
Week8 Live Lecture for Final ExamWeek8 Live Lecture for Final Exam
Week8 Live Lecture for Final Exam
Brent Heard
 

Similar to Bab 8 (20)

How to use statistica for rsm study
How to use statistica for rsm studyHow to use statistica for rsm study
How to use statistica for rsm study
 
Tugas quiz SPSS
Tugas quiz SPSSTugas quiz SPSS
Tugas quiz SPSS
 
Friedman-SPSS.docx
Friedman-SPSS.docxFriedman-SPSS.docx
Friedman-SPSS.docx
 
Decision tree learning
Decision tree learningDecision tree learning
Decision tree learning
 
A sample of adults with hearing aids were randomly assigned to one o.pdf
A sample of adults with hearing aids were randomly assigned to one o.pdfA sample of adults with hearing aids were randomly assigned to one o.pdf
A sample of adults with hearing aids were randomly assigned to one o.pdf
 
RDataMining slides-regression-classification
RDataMining slides-regression-classificationRDataMining slides-regression-classification
RDataMining slides-regression-classification
 
Week8 livelecture2010 follow_up
Week8 livelecture2010 follow_upWeek8 livelecture2010 follow_up
Week8 livelecture2010 follow_up
 
Output
OutputOutput
Output
 
Module 5 lecture_4_final
Module 5 lecture_4_finalModule 5 lecture_4_final
Module 5 lecture_4_final
 
IGARSSWellLog_Vancouver_07_29.pptx
IGARSSWellLog_Vancouver_07_29.pptxIGARSSWellLog_Vancouver_07_29.pptx
IGARSSWellLog_Vancouver_07_29.pptx
 
An Introduction to boosting
An Introduction to boostingAn Introduction to boosting
An Introduction to boosting
 
236628934.pdf
236628934.pdf236628934.pdf
236628934.pdf
 
19 9742 the application paper id 0016(edit ty)
19 9742 the application paper id 0016(edit ty)19 9742 the application paper id 0016(edit ty)
19 9742 the application paper id 0016(edit ty)
 
Diploma sem 2 applied science physics-unit 1-chap 2 error s
Diploma sem 2 applied science physics-unit 1-chap 2 error sDiploma sem 2 applied science physics-unit 1-chap 2 error s
Diploma sem 2 applied science physics-unit 1-chap 2 error s
 
Monte Carlo Methods 2017 July Talk in Montreal
Monte Carlo Methods 2017 July Talk in MontrealMonte Carlo Methods 2017 July Talk in Montreal
Monte Carlo Methods 2017 July Talk in Montreal
 
Quantitative Analysis for Emperical Research
Quantitative Analysis for Emperical ResearchQuantitative Analysis for Emperical Research
Quantitative Analysis for Emperical Research
 
NOTE STATISTIC BA301
NOTE STATISTIC BA301NOTE STATISTIC BA301
NOTE STATISTIC BA301
 
Erning spss baru sekali
Erning spss baru sekaliErning spss baru sekali
Erning spss baru sekali
 
Interpreting Logistic Regression.pptx
Interpreting Logistic Regression.pptxInterpreting Logistic Regression.pptx
Interpreting Logistic Regression.pptx
 
Week8 Live Lecture for Final Exam
Week8 Live Lecture for Final ExamWeek8 Live Lecture for Final Exam
Week8 Live Lecture for Final Exam
 

Recently uploaded

Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th SemesterGuidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Atul Kumar Singh
 
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCECLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
BhavyaRajput3
 
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
EugeneSaldivar
 
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9  .docxAcetabularia Information For Class 9  .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
vaibhavrinwa19
 
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideasThe geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
GeoBlogs
 
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfUnit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Thiyagu K
 
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
Ashokrao Mane college of Pharmacy Peth-Vadgaon
 
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
JosvitaDsouza2
 
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Atul Kumar Singh
 
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativeEmbracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Peter Windle
 
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPhrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
MIRIAMSALINAS13
 
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe..."Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
SACHIN R KONDAGURI
 
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdfAdversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Po-Chuan Chen
 
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxSynthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Pavel ( NSTU)
 
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.pptThesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
EverAndrsGuerraGuerr
 
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdfspecial B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
Special education needs
 
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
MysoreMuleSoftMeetup
 
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
beazzy04
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
Delapenabediema
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th SemesterGuidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
 
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCECLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
 
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
 
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9  .docxAcetabularia Information For Class 9  .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
 
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideasThe geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
 
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfUnit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
 
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
 
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
 
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 5pptx.pptx
 
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
 
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativeEmbracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
 
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPhrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
 
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe..."Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
 
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdfAdversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
 
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxSynthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
 
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.pptThesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
 
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdfspecial B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
 
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
 
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
 

Bab 8

  • 1. SORT CASES BY Practice. SPLIT FILE SEPARATE BY Practice. EXAMINE VARIABLES=Comprehension BY Noise /PLOT NPPLOT /STATISTICS DESCRIPTIVES /CINTERVAL 95 /MISSING LISTWISE /NOTOTAL. Explore Notes Output Created 19-DEC-2021 16:22:13 Comments Input Active Dataset DataSet0 Filter <none> Weight <none> Split File Practice N of Rows in Working Data File 30 Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values for dependent variables are treated as missing. Cases Used Statistics are based on cases with no missing values for any dependent variable or factor used. Syntax EXAMINE VARIABLES=Comprehe nsion BY Noise /PLOT NPPLOT /STATISTICS DESCRIPTIVES /CINTERVAL 95 /MISSING LISTWISE /NOTOTAL. Resources Processor Time 00:00:04.69 Elapsed Time 00:00:05.78 [DataSet0]
  • 2. Practice = No practice Level of background Case Processing Summarya Level of background Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Reading comprehension No noice 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 5 100.0% Low noice 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 5 100.0% High noice 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 5 100.0% a. Practice = No practice Descriptivesa Level of background Statistic Std. Error Reading comprehension No noice Mean 13.80 .663 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 11.96 Upper Bound 15.64 5% Trimmed Mean 13.78 Median 14.00 Variance 2.200 Std. Deviation 1.483 Minimum 12 Maximum 16 Range 4 Interquartile Range 3 Skewness .552 .913 Kurtosis .868 2.000 Low noice Mean 12.60 .600 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 10.93 Upper Bound 14.27 5% Trimmed Mean 12.61 Median 12.00 Variance 1.800 Std. Deviation 1.342 Minimum 11 Maximum 14 Range 3 Interquartile Range 3 Skewness .166 .913 Kurtosis -2.407 2.000 High noice Mean 11.40 .872
  • 3. 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 8.98 Upper Bound 13.82 5% Trimmed Mean 11.39 Median 12.00 Variance 3.800 Std. Deviation 1.949 Minimum 9 Maximum 14 Range 5 Interquartile Range 4 Skewness .081 .913 Kurtosis -.817 2.000 a. Practice = No practice Tests of Normalitya Level of background Kolmogorov-Smirnovb Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. Reading comprehension No noice .246 5 .200* .956 5 .777 Low noice .273 5 .200* .852 5 .201 High noice .221 5 .200* .953 5 .758 *. This is a lower bound of the true significance. a. Practice = No practice b. Lilliefors Significance Correction
  • 7. Level of background Case Processing Summarya Level of background Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Reading comprehension No noice 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 5 100.0% Low noice 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 5 100.0% High noice 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 5 100.0% a. Practice = Practice Descriptivesa Level of background Statistic Std. Error Reading comprehension No noice Mean 18.00 .548 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 16.48 Upper Bound 19.52 5% Trimmed Mean 17.94 Median 18.00 Variance 1.500 Std. Deviation 1.225 Minimum 17 Maximum 20 Range 3 Interquartile Range 2 Skewness 1.361 .913 Kurtosis 2.000 2.000 Low noice Mean 16.80 .583 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 15.18 Upper Bound 18.42 5% Trimmed Mean 16.83 Median 17.00 Variance 1.700 Std. Deviation 1.304 Minimum 15 Maximum 18 Range 3 Interquartile Range 3 Skewness -.541 .913 Kurtosis -1.488 2.000 High noice Mean 12.20 .917 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 9.66 Upper Bound 14.74 5% Trimmed Mean 12.22 Median 13.00 Variance 4.200
  • 8. Std. Deviation 2.049 Minimum 10 Maximum 14 Range 4 Interquartile Range 4 Skewness -.441 .913 Kurtosis -3.163 2.000 a. Practice = Practice Tests of Normalitya Level of background Kolmogorov-Smirnovb Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. Reading comprehension No noice .300 5 .161 .833 5 .146 Low noice .221 5 .200* .902 5 .421 High noice .258 5 .200* .782 5 .057 *. This is a lower bound of the true significance. a. Practice = Practice b. Lilliefors Significance Correction Reading comprehension Normal Q-Q Plots
  • 9.
  • 11. SPLIT FILE OFF. DATASET ACTIVATE DataSet0. UNIANOVA Comprehension BY Practice Noise /METHOD=SSTYPE(3) /INTERCEPT=INCLUDE /PLOT=PROFILE(Practice*Noise) TYPE=LINE ERRORBAR=NO MEANREFERENCE=NO YAXIS=AUTO /EMMEANS=TABLES(Practice) COMPARE ADJ(LSD) /EMMEANS=TABLES(Noise) COMPARE ADJ(LSD) /EMMEANS=TABLES(Practice*Noise) COMPARE(Practice)/EMMEANS=TABLES(Practice*Noise) COMPARE(Noise) /EMMEANS=TABLES(Practice*Noise) /PRINT ETASQ DESCRIPTIVE HOMOGENEITY /CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05) /DESIGN=Practice Noise Practice*Noise.
  • 12. Univariate Analysis of Variance Notes Output Created 19-DEC-2021 16:51:43 Comments Input Active Dataset DataSet0 Filter <none> Weight <none> Split File <none> N of Rows in Working Data File 30 Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are treated as missing. Cases Used Statistics are based on all cases with valid data for all variables in the model.
  • 13. Syntax UNIANOVA Comprehension BY Practice Noise /METHOD=SSTYPE(3) /INTERCEPT=INCLUDE /PLOT=PROFILE(Practi ce*Noise) TYPE=LINE ERRORBAR=NO MEANREFERENCE=N O YAXIS=AUTO /EMMEANS=TABLES(Pr actice) COMPARE ADJ(LSD) /EMMEANS=TABLES(N oise) COMPARE ADJ(LSD) /EMMEANS=TABLES(Pr actice*Noise) COMPARE(Practice)/EM MEANS=TABLES(Practi ce*Noise) COMPARE(Noise) /EMMEANS=TABLES(Pr actice*Noise) /PRINT ETASQ DESCRIPTIVE HOMOGENEITY /CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05) /DESIGN=Practice Noise Practice*Noise. Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.61 Elapsed Time 00:00:00.70 Between-Subjects Factors Value Label N Practice 0 No practice 15 1 Practice 15 Level of background 0 No noice 10 1 Low noice 10 2 High noice 10
  • 14. Descriptive Statistics Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension Practice Level of background Mean Std. Deviation N No practice No noice 13.80 1.483 5 Low noice 12.60 1.342 5 High noice 11.40 1.949 5 Total 12.60 1.805 15 Practice No noice 18.00 1.225 5 Low noice 16.80 1.304 5 High noice 12.20 2.049 5 Total 15.67 2.968 15 Total No noice 15.90 2.558 10 Low noice 14.70 2.541 10 High noice 11.80 1.932 10 Total 14.13 2.874 30 Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa,b Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig. Reading comprehension Based on Mean 1.127 5 24 .373 Based on Median .400 5 24 .844 Based on Median and with adjusted df .400 5 20.061 .843 Based on trimmed mean 1.107 5 24 .383 Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups. a. Dependent variable: Reading comprehension b. Design: Intercept + Practice + Noise + Practice * Noise Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Partial Eta Squared Corrected Model 178.667a 5 35.733 14.105 .000 .746 Intercept 5992.533 1 5992.533 2365.474 .000 .990 Practice 70.533 1 70.533 27.842 .000 .537 Noise 88.867 2 44.433 17.539 .000 .594 Practice * Noise 19.267 2 9.633 3.803 .037 .241 Error 60.800 24 2.533 Total 6232.000 30 Corrected Total 239.467 29 a. R Squared = .746 (Adjusted R Squared = .693)
  • 15. Estimated Marginal Means 1. Practice Estimates Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension Practice Mean Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper Bound No practice 12.600 .411 11.752 13.448 Practice 15.667 .411 14.818 16.515 Pairwise Comparisons Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension (I) Practice (J) Practice Mean Difference (I- J) Std. Error Sig.b 95% Confidence Interval for Differenceb Lower Bound Upper Bound No practice Practice -3.067* .581 .000 -4.266 -1.867 Practice No practice 3.067* .581 .000 1.867 4.266 Based on estimated marginal means *. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level. b. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Least Significant Difference (equivalent to no adjustments). Univariate Tests Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Partial Eta Squared Contrast 70.533 1 70.533 27.842 .000 .537 Error 60.800 24 2.533 The F tests the effect of Practice. This test is based on the linearly independent pairwise comparisons among the estimated marginal means.
  • 16. 2. Level of background Estimates Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension Level of background Mean Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper Bound No noice 15.900 .503 14.861 16.939 Low noice 14.700 .503 13.661 15.739 High noice 11.800 .503 10.761 12.839 Pairwise Comparisons Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension (I) Level of background (J) Level of background Mean Difference (I- J) Std. Error Sig.b 95% Confidence Interval for Differenceb Lower Bound Upper Bound No noice Low noice 1.200 .712 .105 -.269 2.669 High noice 4.100* .712 .000 2.631 5.569 Low noice No noice -1.200 .712 .105 -2.669 .269 High noice 2.900* .712 .000 1.431 4.369 High noice No noice -4.100* .712 .000 -5.569 -2.631 Low noice -2.900* .712 .000 -4.369 -1.431 Based on estimated marginal means *. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level. b. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Least Significant Difference (equivalent to no adjustments). Univariate Tests Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Partial Eta Squared Contrast 88.867 2 44.433 17.539 .000 .594 Error 60.800 24 2.533 The F tests the effect of Level of background. This test is based on the linearly independent pairwise comparisons among the estimated marginal means.
  • 17. 3. Practice * Level of background Estimates Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension Practice Level of background Mean Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper Bound No practice No noice 13.800 .712 12.331 15.269 Low noice 12.600 .712 11.131 14.069 High noice 11.400 .712 9.931 12.869 Practice No noice 18.000 .712 16.531 19.469 Low noice 16.800 .712 15.331 18.269 High noice 12.200 .712 10.731 13.669 Pairwise Comparisons Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension Level of background (I) Practice (J) Practice Mean Difference (I- J) Std. Error Sig.b 95% Confidence Interval for Differenceb Lower Bound Upper Bound No noice No practice Practice -4.200* 1.007 .000 -6.278 -2.122 Practice No practice 4.200* 1.007 .000 2.122 6.278 Low noice No practice Practice -4.200* 1.007 .000 -6.278 -2.122 Practice No practice 4.200* 1.007 .000 2.122 6.278 High noice No practice Practice -.800 1.007 .435 -2.878 1.278 Practice No practice .800 1.007 .435 -1.278 2.878 Based on estimated marginal means *. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level. b. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Least Significant Difference (equivalent to no adjustments). Univariate Tests Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension Level of background Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Partial Eta Squared No noice Contrast 44.100 1 44.100 17.408 .000 .420 Error 60.800 24 2.533 Low noice Contrast 44.100 1 44.100 17.408 .000 .420 Error 60.800 24 2.533 High noice Contrast 1.600 1 1.600 .632 .435 .026 Error 60.800 24 2.533 Each F tests the simple effects of Practice within each level combination of the other effects shown. These tests are based on the linearly independent pairwise comparisons among the estimated marginal means.
  • 18. 4. Practice * Level of background Estimates Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension Practice Level of background Mean Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper Bound No practice No noice 13.800 .712 12.331 15.269 Low noice 12.600 .712 11.131 14.069 High noice 11.400 .712 9.931 12.869 Practice No noice 18.000 .712 16.531 19.469 Low noice 16.800 .712 15.331 18.269 High noice 12.200 .712 10.731 13.669 Pairwise Comparisons Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension Practice (I) Level of background (J) Level of background Mean Difference (I- J) Std. Error Sig.b 95% Confidence Interval for Differenceb Lower Bound Upper Bound No practice No noice Low noice 1.200 1.007 .245 -.878 3.278 High noice 2.400* 1.007 .025 .322 4.478 Low noice No noice -1.200 1.007 .245 -3.278 .878 High noice 1.200 1.007 .245 -.878 3.278 High noice No noice -2.400* 1.007 .025 -4.478 -.322 Low noice -1.200 1.007 .245 -3.278 .878 Practice No noice Low noice 1.200 1.007 .245 -.878 3.278 High noice 5.800* 1.007 .000 3.722 7.878 Low noice No noice -1.200 1.007 .245 -3.278 .878 High noice 4.600* 1.007 .000 2.522 6.678 High noice No noice -5.800* 1.007 .000 -7.878 -3.722 Low noice -4.600* 1.007 .000 -6.678 -2.522 Based on estimated marginal means *. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level. b. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Least Significant Difference (equivalent to no adjustments). Univariate Tests Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension Practice Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Partial Eta Squared No practice Contrast 14.400 2 7.200 2.842 .078 .191 Error 60.800 24 2.533 Practice Contrast 93.733 2 46.867 18.500 .000 .607 Error 60.800 24 2.533
  • 19. Each F tests the simple effects of Level of background within each level combination of the other effects shown. These tests are based on the linearly independent pairwise comparisons among the estimated marginal means. 5. Practice * Level of background Dependent Variable: Reading comprehension Practice Level of background Mean Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper Bound No practice No noice 13.800 .712 12.331 15.269 Low noice 12.600 .712 11.131 14.069 High noice 11.400 .712 9.931 12.869 Practice No noice 18.000 .712 16.531 19.469 Low noice 16.800 .712 15.331 18.269 High noice 12.200 .712 10.731 13.669 Profile Plots