The audience members provided positive feedback on the documentary. They rated the documentary as highly informative, with ratings of 4 or 5 out of 5. They praised the technical quality as very good or professional-looking. The lower third titles were described as excellent, professional, or linking well with the theme. The settings of interviews were seen as appropriate. The music was seen as effective in matching the tone. The color scheme was seen as linking well with the theme of social networking. The title sequence was described as professionally done and linking well with the theme. Overall opinions were that it was a really excellent, professionally done and interesting documentary that audience members wanted to see more of.

1. Audience Feedback Answers and Questions Audience member 1
Audience member 2
Audience member 3
1. On a scale of one to five how informative is the documentary?
(If 5= informative and 1= not v. informative) 4- it laid out the
arguments with scope to expand further.
4
5
2. One a scale of one to five how entertaining is the documentary?
1= not 5=very I'd say 5.
4
5
3. What do you think about the overall technical quality?
Very good overall technical quality, nice clear shots and images.
I particularly like the shot of the boy leaning over his tablet
with the screen lighting his face- artsy but not in your face
artsy which is very effective. The only thing I would say is that
in the first half some of the Voice over, and a couple of the
interviewers are a little quiet so the music starts to impinge on
listenability.
The lighting could be a little better other then that it is very
professional looking
The sound fits well and the editing looks professional
4. What are your opinions on the lover third titles?
Lower third titles are excellent
They are good
The lower third titles look rather professional.
5. How well do the lower thirds link to the theme?
Link in well to the theme in colour and style. The colours are a
good choice.
They link well
They link with the theme as they look like twitter
6. Do you think the settings of the interviews are appropicate?
I think the interview settings are good. If you were elaborating
on the cyberbullying in a longer documentary though some

2. shots of schools/skateparks/kids on phones whilst in school
would perhaps be good. The bank manager one being at home
is a little odd but I think in the context of getting connections
and working outside of an office networking it does work.
yes
The setting of the interviews are appropriate
7. Do you think the music is effective? Why?
I think the music is a good choice, and the shift from the upbeat
poppy sounds to the more melancholy is very well done clearly
demarcating the two sides of the argument
Yes the mood of the music matches the tone of the interviews.
Yes the music is effective as it isn’t too upbeat to make you stop
paying attention however it’s not bad enough to make you lose
interest.
8. Does the colour scheme link with the theme of social
networking?
The colour scheme is good- it's not too in you face but is
evocative of the main social networks at present. I like the use
of white space too and newsfeed screens I think that's
excellently done.
Yes very blue
Yes the colour scheme links
9. What do you think about the title sequence?
Absolutely love the title sequence. Very well put together. Good
variety of sites, nicely paced without being so quick you can't
follow the thread.
It works well with all of the different sites
It is professional looking and it links in with the theme
10.
What is your overall opinion of the documentary?
A really excellent documentary- I'm taking it as the clip being
the beginning of a longer piece because of how it cut off I hope
that's okay but it is very smooth with some good interviews in
there. I'd certainly watch more
It is good and I want to watch more
The documentary looks professionally done and is rather
interesting.