This document presents country profiles summarizing eHealth indicators from 114 WHO Member States that participated in a 2009 global survey. The profiles describe the current status of ICT use in health based on responses to questions about national policies, legal frameworks, funding, capacity building efforts, and specific eHealth applications. Secondary data on socioeconomic indicators are also included to complement each country profile.
Italy is an intriguing case study of how value-based healthcare, which looks at health outcomes of treatment relative to cost, can evolve. The country offers an interesting dichotomy between a pioneering approach to financing innovative treatments on the one hand, and a more complex and arguably less sophisticated institutional structure and measures for assessing healthcare outcomes on the other.
Italy is an intriguing case study of how value-based healthcare, which looks at health outcomes of treatment relative to cost, can evolve. The country offers an interesting dichotomy between a pioneering approach to financing innovative treatments on the one hand, and a more complex and arguably less sophisticated institutional structure and measures for assessing healthcare outcomes on the other.
Eysenbach AMIA Keynote: From Patient Needs to Personal Health ApplicationsGunther Eysenbach
AMIA Spring Conference, May 29th-31st, 2008, Phoenix/AZ. PHR Track Keynote covers: An international perspective on the importance of PHR/PHA development & research; patient needs (and other drivers of Personal Health Records); Emerging technological trends, with an emphasis on what Eysenbach calls PHR 2.0 – impact of Web 2.0 approaches e.g. to reduce attrition in ehealth applications
he technologies collectively known as health information technology (health IT) share a common attribute: they enable the secure collection and exchange of vast amounts of health data about individuals. The collection and movement of this data will power the health care of the future. Health IT has the potential to empower individuals and increase transparency; enhance the ability to study care delivery and payment systems; and ultimately achieve improvements in care, efficiency, and population health.
My Health Future Healthcare Solutions in Emerging Markets (Vietnam), Team Fin...Team Finland Future Watch
Main questions of My Health investigations are: 1) How cultural and geographical contexts effect on acceptance of new health products, services and solutions and what are the motivations behind different choices? 2) What kind of consumer and customer understanding do Finnish enterprises need in order to success in emerging markets 3) What kind of cultural or customer behavior changes would be anticipated in emerging markets in future?
AN EHEALTH ADOPTION FRAMEWORK FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEWhiij
There is growing interest in the rate of eHealth uptake resulting from the increased potential to advance
the quality of healthcare services in both the developed and developing countries. Although the
implementation of information and communication technology to support healthcare delivery would
greatly address the quality and accessibility challenges in healthcare as well as reduction in the cost of
healthcare delivery, the adoption of eHealth has not been fully realized. This study aimed at conducting a
systematic literature review to establish the factors associated with the adoption of eHealth and propose a
context-specific framework for successful adoption of eHealth technologies in developing countries such as
Uganda. The systematic literature review process was guided by the Systematic Review Protocol. The
review of 29 journals from the period 2009-2021 showed that, although the most widely used frameworks
in the developing countries were Technology Adoption Model (TAM), Unified Theory of Acceptance and
Use of Technology (UTAUT) framework and Technology Organization Environment (TOE) framework,
there were other salient factors reported by other researchers that contributed to the adoption of eHealth
in developing countries. A novel framework for adoption of eHealth in the local context with eight (8)
dimensions namely; Socio-demographic, Technology, Information, Socio-cultural, Organization,
Governance, Ethical and legal and Financial dimensions is derived and presented as result of the
research.
REALTIME NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE SCHEME (RNHIS): MEANS TO ACHIEVE HEALTH FO...IJCSEA Journal
E-health, tele-medicine, and informatics are terms prominent in the health sector nowadays; Real-time Health
Insurance should be among. The laudable program, National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) introduced in
Nigeria can only be effective and efficient with the introduction of dynamic and integrated online NHIS system.
Data were gathered through document examination, internet and interview of NHIS desk officers, health
record officers, and NHIS accountant in two of our tertiary hospitals. Data were analysed and graphs were
drawn to show current status. Software Engineering architecture for its development for better system was
introduced. From the data analysed, it was found that none of the current Nigeria HMOs, Health Facilities
(HFs) and NHIS headquarters is fully computerised and networked which is making the current system
epileptic. People on transit and rural areas are not adequately catered for. Therefore, a workable Real-time
Health Insurance Scheme will help people on transit and bridge urban-rural health divide.
This is an assignment for ITTP Special Topic in IT Engineering. Within this presentation, I try to propose e-health as term project.
E-health is important for Indonesia.
A Safer Financial Sector to Serve South Africa BetterDr Lendy Spires
Although South Africa‘s financial institutions were resilient in the face of the crisis, the indirect impact through job losses was devastating. In short, we cannot be complacent. National Treasury launched a formal review of the financial regulatory system in 2007. The scope of this review was expanded in 2008 after the financial crisis. This work has now been completed, culminating in this document, which sets out a number of proposals. This document provides a comprehensive review of the key challenges facing the financial sector, and proposes a roadmap to deal with the challenges. It presents government‘s vision of how to reshape the sector in order to address these challenges, and sets out the policy priorities of government over the next few years. The approach to financial sector reform takes into account not only the direct lessons of the crisis, but also the broader policy objectives of maintaining financial sector stability, protecting consumers and ensuring that efficient, effective and inexpensive financial services are more accessible. Box 1.1 A safer financial sector to serve South Africa better To promote sustained economic growth and development, South Africa needs a stable financial services sector that is accessible to all. This policy document sets out government‟s proposals, emphasising financial stability, consumer protection and financial inclusion. The main proposal is to separate prudential and market conduct regulation. In addition, it addresses: Stability.
Eysenbach AMIA Keynote: From Patient Needs to Personal Health ApplicationsGunther Eysenbach
AMIA Spring Conference, May 29th-31st, 2008, Phoenix/AZ. PHR Track Keynote covers: An international perspective on the importance of PHR/PHA development & research; patient needs (and other drivers of Personal Health Records); Emerging technological trends, with an emphasis on what Eysenbach calls PHR 2.0 – impact of Web 2.0 approaches e.g. to reduce attrition in ehealth applications
he technologies collectively known as health information technology (health IT) share a common attribute: they enable the secure collection and exchange of vast amounts of health data about individuals. The collection and movement of this data will power the health care of the future. Health IT has the potential to empower individuals and increase transparency; enhance the ability to study care delivery and payment systems; and ultimately achieve improvements in care, efficiency, and population health.
My Health Future Healthcare Solutions in Emerging Markets (Vietnam), Team Fin...Team Finland Future Watch
Main questions of My Health investigations are: 1) How cultural and geographical contexts effect on acceptance of new health products, services and solutions and what are the motivations behind different choices? 2) What kind of consumer and customer understanding do Finnish enterprises need in order to success in emerging markets 3) What kind of cultural or customer behavior changes would be anticipated in emerging markets in future?
AN EHEALTH ADOPTION FRAMEWORK FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEWhiij
There is growing interest in the rate of eHealth uptake resulting from the increased potential to advance
the quality of healthcare services in both the developed and developing countries. Although the
implementation of information and communication technology to support healthcare delivery would
greatly address the quality and accessibility challenges in healthcare as well as reduction in the cost of
healthcare delivery, the adoption of eHealth has not been fully realized. This study aimed at conducting a
systematic literature review to establish the factors associated with the adoption of eHealth and propose a
context-specific framework for successful adoption of eHealth technologies in developing countries such as
Uganda. The systematic literature review process was guided by the Systematic Review Protocol. The
review of 29 journals from the period 2009-2021 showed that, although the most widely used frameworks
in the developing countries were Technology Adoption Model (TAM), Unified Theory of Acceptance and
Use of Technology (UTAUT) framework and Technology Organization Environment (TOE) framework,
there were other salient factors reported by other researchers that contributed to the adoption of eHealth
in developing countries. A novel framework for adoption of eHealth in the local context with eight (8)
dimensions namely; Socio-demographic, Technology, Information, Socio-cultural, Organization,
Governance, Ethical and legal and Financial dimensions is derived and presented as result of the
research.
REALTIME NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE SCHEME (RNHIS): MEANS TO ACHIEVE HEALTH FO...IJCSEA Journal
E-health, tele-medicine, and informatics are terms prominent in the health sector nowadays; Real-time Health
Insurance should be among. The laudable program, National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) introduced in
Nigeria can only be effective and efficient with the introduction of dynamic and integrated online NHIS system.
Data were gathered through document examination, internet and interview of NHIS desk officers, health
record officers, and NHIS accountant in two of our tertiary hospitals. Data were analysed and graphs were
drawn to show current status. Software Engineering architecture for its development for better system was
introduced. From the data analysed, it was found that none of the current Nigeria HMOs, Health Facilities
(HFs) and NHIS headquarters is fully computerised and networked which is making the current system
epileptic. People on transit and rural areas are not adequately catered for. Therefore, a workable Real-time
Health Insurance Scheme will help people on transit and bridge urban-rural health divide.
This is an assignment for ITTP Special Topic in IT Engineering. Within this presentation, I try to propose e-health as term project.
E-health is important for Indonesia.
A Safer Financial Sector to Serve South Africa BetterDr Lendy Spires
Although South Africa‘s financial institutions were resilient in the face of the crisis, the indirect impact through job losses was devastating. In short, we cannot be complacent. National Treasury launched a formal review of the financial regulatory system in 2007. The scope of this review was expanded in 2008 after the financial crisis. This work has now been completed, culminating in this document, which sets out a number of proposals. This document provides a comprehensive review of the key challenges facing the financial sector, and proposes a roadmap to deal with the challenges. It presents government‘s vision of how to reshape the sector in order to address these challenges, and sets out the policy priorities of government over the next few years. The approach to financial sector reform takes into account not only the direct lessons of the crisis, but also the broader policy objectives of maintaining financial sector stability, protecting consumers and ensuring that efficient, effective and inexpensive financial services are more accessible. Box 1.1 A safer financial sector to serve South Africa better To promote sustained economic growth and development, South Africa needs a stable financial services sector that is accessible to all. This policy document sets out government‟s proposals, emphasising financial stability, consumer protection and financial inclusion. The main proposal is to separate prudential and market conduct regulation. In addition, it addresses: Stability.
Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises and the Informal Sector Dr Lendy Spires
PER&O 2006 identified an important issue related to employment growth namely that, while the formal sector appeared to be growing, the informal sector was lacklustre and did not appear to be generating new employment. In fact, informal sector employment appeared to be stagnant at best, preventing the sector from making a greater contribution to the provincial economy. This year, we take a closer look at the informal sector and Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises (SMMEs) in the Province.
This section presents some descriptive statistics of informal sector and SMME employment. The section continues by looking at some of the factors that may hinder growth, employment expansion and rising incomes in these sectors. It is hoped that this section raises some important issues for further debate and investigation. 2. SMMEs and the informal sector In PER&O 2006, it was noted that the informal sector was not performing well, that it was in fact flagging and therefore not making the contribution it could to employment growth and the alleviation of poverty. Informal sector employment was, at best, stagnant and, at worst, falling between 2000 and 2004.
While greater formal sector employment should, arguably, be the primary focus of policy in this area, the informal sector should not be neglected. In this section, we look at some of the characteristics of the informal and SMME sectors and some of the issues and challenges facing them. 2.1 Descriptive overview of informal and small business sectors The dividing line between the informal sector and the formal sector is not always a clear one, with varying definitions being used in different countries attempting to categorise economic activity that essentially falls on a (multi-dimensional) continuum.
Further, classifying businesses according to size can be done in more than one way, thus leading to situations where firms identified as small using one criterion are not necessarily small according to another. Although there is no universally accepted definition of what constitutes an informal enterprise, there is consensus that they are small scale, and operate outside registration, tax and social security frameworks, and health and safety rules for workers, with informal economic activity being defined by its ‘precarious’ nature. Chapter 6: Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises and the Informal Sector
Presentación de David Novillo en el nternational Workshop RITMOS, celebrado el pasado 14 y 15 de octubre en Barcelona con el apoyo de la UOC y Mobile World Capital de Barcelona (MWBC)
E health in Nigeria Current Realities and Future Perspectives. A User Centric...Ibukun Fowe
In this era of the digital revolution, innovative computer software programs and Information and communications technologies (ICTs) are disrupting different industries of most economies and the healthcare sector is one of the nascent and emerging opportunities for technology disruption and innovation. This is an “inevitable” welcome development as Global health innovation is at the forefront of embracing the use of technology solutions in various parts of the world to improve access to health services and medicines, and Nigeria is not to be an exception. This symposium is focused on asking the fundamental questions; how much impact are e-health applications making in the Nigerian health sector and how do we improve the level of impact and
effectiveness of these applications via a user-centric approach?
Taking these proactive steps serve to ensure that we focus on the real needs of the Nigerian people and put in place quality and safety measures that will give users the confidence needed to use e-health applications and solutions adequately and appropriately. This symposium invites key-stakeholders in the e-health
ecosystem to share their views on the pains and gains of e-health as of today and how to shape the future of e-health in Nigeria (and similar countries). Some of the presentations and panelist sessions will include real field experience and user-centered qualitative research that will elicit the current level of impact and the real needs of e-health users in the southwest region of Nigeria.
Chapter 30 International Efforts, Issues, and InnovationsHyeoun-.docxchristinemaritza
Chapter 30 International Efforts, Issues, and Innovations
Hyeoun-Ae Park
To promote international development in health and nursing informatics it is necessary to provide tools for the development of national and regional ehealth initiatives and strategies.
Objectives
At the completion of this chapter the reader will be prepared to:
1.Outline key international health informatics initiatives
2.Describe key organizations leading international health informatics initiatives
3.Discuss the role of health practitioners such as nurses in international health informatics initiatives
Key Terms
Derived classifications, 482
eHealth initiatives, 474
Reference classifications, 482
Related classifications, 482
Abstract
This chapter highlights international health informatics initiatives, international organizations involved in these initiatives, and how health practitioners such as nurses are involved in the activities of these organizations. There are numerous international health informatics–related activities that have been initiated across the different regions of the world. In addition academic societies within these regions are pursuing health informatics theory and practice developments. These international health informatics initiatives, along with associated academic organizations, are introduced here with brief histories and the key activities of each region. There are also several international organizations involved in the development of health informatics, such as the World Health Organization, the International Medical Informatics Association, the International Organization for Standardization, the International Council of Nurses, the International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation, and Health Level Seven. These organizations are introduced with a short description of health practitioners' contributions to their activities. Finally, global issues in health informatics initiatives are also described.
Introduction
In many parts of the world healthcare is one of the largest sectors of the economy. As a result, health spending plays a major role in economic policy throughout the world with growing pressure on the healthcare industry to streamline costs, gain efficiency, and become more innovative in improving and maintaining the health of the population. Today the health industry around the world is looking for better ways of providing healthcare and improved health for all. The application of health information technology (health IT), called information and communication technology or ICT in international settings, to healthcare is seen as key to realizing this aim. The World Health Organization (WHO) uses ehealth as an umbrella term to cover all aspects of the use of ICT in healthcare. While the terminology differs—from health IT to ICT to ehealth—the goal of using technology to effectively and efficiently improve the health of individuals, families, and communities remains the same. An important differenc ...
eHealth Practice in Europe: where do we stand?chronaki
eHealth as the use of Information and communication technologies in the practice of health care comprises Electronic health records, Healthcare information exchange cross-jurisdictions, Personal health records, Telehealth, telemedicine and remote monitoring.
There are several efforts to reflect and measure the practice of eHealth including efforts by the OECD and WHO, but in general there is little reported sharing of health data particularly with patients. Specific barriers frequently mentioned are supporting policies and coherent widely implemented standards.
The presentation discusses relevant efforts and programs supported by the European Commission such as the eHealth DSI, eStandards, ASSESS CT, and openMedicine aiming at large scale eHealth adoption It calls for engagement of European Society, its national societies, and its members.
Overview of Health Informatics: survey of fundamentals of health information technology, Identify the forces behind health informatics, educational and career opportunities in health informatics.
Monitoring progress towards universal health coverage at country and global l...The Rockefeller Foundation
A movement towards universal health coverage (UHC) – ensuring that everyone who needs health services is able to get them, without undue financial hardship – has been growing across the globe (1). This has led to a sharp increase in the demand for expertise, evidence and measures of progress and a push to make UHC one of the goals of the post-2015 development agenda (2). This paper proposes a framework for tracking country and global progress towards UHC; its aim is to inform and guide these discussions and assessment of both aggregate and equitable coverage of essential health services as well as financial protection. Monitoring progress towards these two components of UHC will be complementary and critical to achieving desirable health outcome goals, such as ending preventable deaths and promoting healthy life expectancy and also reducing poverty and protecting household incomes.
This paper was written jointly by the World Health Organization (WHO) and The World Bank Group on the basis of consultations and discussions with country representatives, technical experts and global health and development partners (3). A draft of this paper was posted online and circulated widely for consultation between December 2013 and February 2014. Nearly 70 submissions were received from countries, development partners, civil society, academics and other interested stakeholders. The feedback was synthesized and reviewed at a meeting of country and global experts in Bellagio, Italy, in March 2014 (4). The paper was modified to reflect the views emerging from these consultations.
Reviewwww.thelancet.com Vol 395 May 16, 2020 1579Adessiechisomjj4
Review
www.thelancet.com Vol 395 May 16, 2020 1579
Artificial intelligence and the future of global health
Nina Schwalbe*, Brian Wahl*
Concurrent advances in information technology infrastructure and mobile computing power in many low and
middle-income countries (LMICs) have raised hopes that artificial intelligence (AI) might help to address challenges
unique to the field of global health and accelerate achievement of the health-related sustainable development goals. A
series of fundamental questions have been raised about AI-driven health interventions, and whether the tools,
methods, and protections traditionally used to make ethical and evidence-based decisions about new technologies can
be applied to AI. Deployment of AI has already begun for a broad range of health issues common to LMICs, with
interventions focused primarily on communicable diseases, including tuberculosis and malaria. Types of AI vary, but
most use some form of machine learning or signal processing. Several types of machine learning methods are
frequently used together, as is machine learning with other approaches, most often signal processing. AI-driven
health interventions fit into four categories relevant to global health researchers: (1) diagnosis, (2) patient morbidity
or mortality risk assessment, (3) disease outbreak prediction and surveillance, and (4) health policy and planning.
However, much of the AI-driven intervention research in global health does not describe ethical, regulatory, or
practical considerations required for widespread use or deployment at scale. Despite the field remaining nascent,
AI-driven health interventions could lead to improved health outcomes in LMICs. Although some challenges of
developing and deploying these interventions might not be unique to these settings, the global health community will
need to work quickly to establish guidelines for development, testing, and use, and develop a user-driven research
agenda to facilitate equitable and ethical use.
Introduction
AI is changing how health services are delivered in many
high-income settings, particularly in specialty care
(eg, radiology and pathology).1–3 This development has
been facilitated by the growing availability of large
datasets and novel analytical methods that rely on such
datasets. Concurrent advances in information technology
(IT) infrastructure and mobile computing power have
raised hopes that AI might also provide opportunities to
address health challenges in LMICs.4 These challenges,
including acute health workforce shortages and weak
public health surveillance systems, undermine global
progress towards achieving the health-related sustainable
development goals (SDGs).5,6 Although not unique to
such countries, these challenges are particularly relevant
given their contribution to morbidity and mortality.7,8
AI-driven health technologies could be used to address
many of these and other system-related challenges.4
For example, ...
Multi-cluster Kubernetes Networking- Patterns, Projects and GuidelinesSanjeev Rampal
Talk presented at Kubernetes Community Day, New York, May 2024.
Technical summary of Multi-Cluster Kubernetes Networking architectures with focus on 4 key topics.
1) Key patterns for Multi-cluster architectures
2) Architectural comparison of several OSS/ CNCF projects to address these patterns
3) Evolution trends for the APIs of these projects
4) Some design recommendations & guidelines for adopting/ deploying these solutions.
This 7-second Brain Wave Ritual Attracts Money To You.!nirahealhty
Discover the power of a simple 7-second brain wave ritual that can attract wealth and abundance into your life. By tapping into specific brain frequencies, this technique helps you manifest financial success effortlessly. Ready to transform your financial future? Try this powerful ritual and start attracting money today!
1.Wireless Communication System_Wireless communication is a broad term that i...JeyaPerumal1
Wireless communication involves the transmission of information over a distance without the help of wires, cables or any other forms of electrical conductors.
Wireless communication is a broad term that incorporates all procedures and forms of connecting and communicating between two or more devices using a wireless signal through wireless communication technologies and devices.
Features of Wireless Communication
The evolution of wireless technology has brought many advancements with its effective features.
The transmitted distance can be anywhere between a few meters (for example, a television's remote control) and thousands of kilometers (for example, radio communication).
Wireless communication can be used for cellular telephony, wireless access to the internet, wireless home networking, and so on.
ER(Entity Relationship) Diagram for online shopping - TAEHimani415946
https://bit.ly/3KACoyV
The ER diagram for the project is the foundation for the building of the database of the project. The properties, datatypes, and attributes are defined by the ER diagram.
3. eHealth
country
profiles ATLAS
Based on the findings of the
second global survey on eHealth
Global Observatory for
eHealth series - Volume 1
2010
4. Acknowledgments
This publication is part of a series of reports based on the second Global Observatory on
eHealth (GOe) Survey. The preparation of this report would not have been possible without
the input of hundreds of eHealth experts and the support of the numerous colleagues at
the World Health Organization headquarters, regional and country offices.
Our sincere gratitude goes to over 800 eHealth experts in 114 countries worldwide who
helped shape this report by sharing their knowledge through completing the survey. We
are also indebted to an extensive network of eHealth professionals and WHO staff who
assisted with the design and implementation of the survey. Names of contributors can be
found at http://www.who.int/goe
Special thanks to the many authors and reviewers who contributed their time and ideas
to this publication especially Titilola Falasinnu (Lola) who developed the template and
compiled the secondary data for each participating Member State. The document was
reviewed by colleagues Gael Kernen, Joan Dzenowagis and Ahmad Hosseinpoor.
Special appreciation to:
Messagio Studios and Jillian Reichenbach Ott for their design and layout, and Kai Lashley
for technical editing.
The global survey and this report were prepared by the WHO Global Observatory for eHealth:
Misha Kay, Jonathan Santos, and Marina Takane.
5. Table of contents
i
Background . . . . . . . ii
Methodological considerations . . . iii
Quality assurance . . . . . . iii
Terminology and interpretation . . . vi
Presentation of primary data . . .viii
Presentation of secondary data . . . ix
Country profiles . . . . . .1
6. Background
1 A guide to the
eHealth country
profiles
This publication presents data on the 114 WHO Member States that participated in
the 2009 global survey on eHealth. Intended as a reference to the state of eHealth
development in Member States, the publication highlights selected indicators in the form
of country profiles.
The objectives of the country profiles are to:
Ė describe the current status of the use of ICT for health in Member States; and
Ė provide information concerning the progress of eHealth applications in these
countries.
Due to layout restrictions, additional information provided by Member States could not be
included in these profiles. The country survey tools may be downloaded from the following
web site: http://www.who.int/goe. All country profiles can be accessed at the same URL as
well as the full country data sets.
ii
7. Methodological considerations
A total of 114 countries (59% of WHO Member States, representing 81% of the world’s
population) completed at least one section of the survey (Figure 1). The survey responses
were based on self-reporting by a selected group of eHealth expert informants for
each participating country. Although national survey administrators were given detailed
instructions to maintain consistency, there was significant variation across participating
Member States in the quality and level of detail in the responses, particularly to
descriptive, open-ended questions. While survey responses were checked for consistency
and accuracy, it was not possible to verify all responses to every question.
The scope of the survey was broad; survey questions covered diverse areas of eHealth,
from policy issues and legal frameworks to specific types of eHealth initiatives being
conducted. While every effort was made to select the best national experts to complete
the instrument, it was not possible to determine whether they had the collective eHealth
knowledge to answer each question. Further, there is no guarantee that national experts
used the detailed instructions included with the survey when responding.
Quality assurance
Country profiles are intended to provide a ‘snapshot’ of the status of eHealth in WHO
Member States according to selected criteria. The Global Observatory for eHealth (GOe)
implemented a range of measures to assure their quality. The questionnaires received
from participating countries were reviewed for completeness. External sources of
information were used for validation of the data and to resolve inconsistencies. Data
were reviewed before entry and after layout for publication.
iii
8. Figure 1: Countries completing part or all of the global eHealth survey
Reponding Member State
Data not available
Not applicable
iv
10. Terminology and interpretation
The following terms and definitions were used in the survey and therefore apply to the
country profiles. The terms are listed in the order they appear in the country profiles.
Ė National eGovernment policy: the vision and objectives for the use of information
and communication technologies (ICT) to exchange information, provide services,
and communicate with citizens, businesses, and other sectors.
Ė National eHealth policy: the vision and objectives to promote the use of ICT
specifically for the health sector.
Ė National ICT procurement policy: the principles for the acquisition of software,
hardware, and content for the health sector.
Ė National multiculturalism policy: the vision and objectives to promote and respect
linguistic diversity, cultural identity, traditions, and religions within cultures.
Ė Personal identifiable data: information which can specifically identify an individual.
This can include, but is not limited to, names, date of birth, addresses, telephone
numbers, occupations, photographs, fingerprints – regardless of the format or
medium in which it is held.
Ė Health-related data: information recorded about an individual including their
illnesses and prescribed treatments. It generally includes details of prescribed
medication, and any medical or surgical procedures undertaken as well as
treatments received from other health-care providers.
Ė eHealth: the use of ICT for health
Ė Electronic Medical Records / Electronic Health Records (EMR/EHR): a real-time
longitudinal electronic record of an individual patient’s health information that
can assist health professionals with decision-making and treatment. Terms used
interchangeably in this survey.
Ė Internet pharmacies: Internet sites selling pharmaceuticals and related products.
Ė Funding: eHealth funding can come from a number of sources. Public funding
is support through financial resources provided by government be it national,
regional, or district level. Private funding is support through financial or in-kind
resources provided by the private or commercial sector. Donor/non-public funding
is support through financial or in-kind resources provided by development
agencies, banks, foundations or other non-public funding bodies. These can be
international, regional, or national bodies. Public-private partnerships are joint
ventures between public organizations and private sector companies to work
together to achieve a common goal.
vi
11. Ė Capacity building: the development of the health work force through training. ICT
skills and knowledge are key elements in developing an information society. They
contribute to building capacity through their inclusion in education and training.
Ė ICT continuing education: courses or programmes for health professionals (not
necessarily for formal accreditation) that bring participants up-to-date with ICT
knowledge or skills for health settings.
Ė Telemedicine (or telehealth): involves the delivery of health services using ICT,
specifically where distance is a barrier to health care. It falls under the rubric of
eHealth.
Ė mHealth (or mobile health): a term for medical and public health practice
supported by mobile devices, such as mobile phones, patient monitoring devices,
personal digital assistants (PDAs), and other wireless devices.
Ė eLearning: the use of ICT for learning. It can be used to improve the quality of
education, to increase accessibility to education (for those geographically isolated
or those who have access to inadequate learning facilities), and to make new
and innovative forms of education available to more people.
vii
12. Presentation of primary data
Below is a sample of a typical table found in the country profiles. Descriptions follow,
which correspond to the boxed numbers.
II. Legal and ethical frameworks for eHealth
Country response Global response (%)a§
Legislation on personal and health-related data
7RHQVXUHSULYDFRISHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWD Yes 70
7RSURWHFWSHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWDVSHFLÀFDOOLQ(05RU(+51 No 30
Legislation for sharing health-related data between health care staff through EMR/EHR1
Within the same health care facility and its network of care providers No 26
With different health care entities within the country No 23
With health care entities in other countries No 11
Internet pharmacies
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFRSHUDWLRQV Prohibits $OORZV3URKLELWV
1DWLRQDOUHJXODWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQFHUWLÀFDWLRQRI,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFVLWHV No 7
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFSXUFKDVHVIURPRWKHUFRXQWULHV No $OORZV3URKLELWV
Internet safety
*RYHUQPHQWVSRQVRUHGLQLWLDWLYHVDERXW,QWHUQHWVDIHWDQGOLWHUDF Yes 47
6HFXULWWRROVUHTXLUHGEODZIRUIDFLOLWLHVXVHGEFKLOGUHQ Do not know 22
Quality assurance approaches to health-related Internet content
9ROXQWDUFRPSOLDQFHEFRQWHQWSURYLGHUVRUZHEVLWHRZQHUV Yes 55
7HFKQRORJWKURXJKÀOWHUVDQGFRQWUROV No 28
Government intervention through laws or regulations No 26
(GXFDWLRQSURJUDPPHVIRUFRQVXPHUVDQGSURIHVVLRQDOV No 23
2IÀFLDODSSURYDOWKURXJKFHUWLÀFDWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQRUTXDOLWVHDOV No 16
1.
2.
3.
4.
Country response is the country’s answer to “Yes/No/Do not know” questions in
the survey. It could also refer to the country’s selection of the options presented in
closed-ended questions. The country has instituted legislation to ensure privacy of
personally identifiable data of individuals irrespective of whether it is in analogue
or digital format. The global response is the percentage of participating Member
States responding “Yes” to questions. Alternatively, it also indicates the percentage
of countries selecting an option presented in closed-ended questions. Seventy per
cent of participating Member States responded that they have instituted legislation to
ensure privacy of personally identifiable data of individuals irrespective of whether it
is in analogue or digital format.
The country has no legislation that either allows or prohibits Internet pharmacy
purchases from other countries. Globally, 6% of responding countries indicated that
they have legislation that allows Internet pharmacy purchases from other countries.
Twelve per cent have legislation that prohibits Internet pharmacy purchases from
other countries.
The options in this section are listed in the order of global importance. Based on the
aggregated responses from all participating Member States, voluntary compliance
was the most cited answer (55%), while official approval through certification,
accreditation, or quality seals was the least cited.
The country does not utilize official approval through certification, accreditation, or
quality seals as a quality assurance approach to health-related Internet content.
In contrast, 16% of responding countries indicated that they have adopted official
approval through certification, accreditation, or quality seals as an approach to
health-related Internet content.
1.
o
$$OOOORRZZVV33UURRKKLLEELLWWVV
TT
99RROOXXQQWWDDUUFFRRPPSSOOLLDDQQFFHHEEFFRRQQWWHHQQWWSSUURRYYLLGGHHUUVVRRUUZZHHEEVVLLWWHHRRZZQQHHUUVV 77HHFFKKQQRROORRJJWWKKUURRXXJJKKÀÀOOWWHHUUVVDDQQGGFFRRQQWWUURROOVV ((GGXXFFDDWWLLRRQQSSUURRJJUUDDPPPPHHVVIIRRUUFFRRQQVVXXPPHHUUVVDDQQGGSSUURRIIHHVVVVLLRRQQDDOOVV 22IIÀÀFFLLDDOODDSSSSUURRYYDDOOWWKKUURRXXJJKKFFHHUUWWLLÀÀFFDDWWLLRRQQDDFFFFUUHHGGLLWWDDWWLLRRQQRRUUTTXXDDOOLLWWVVHHDDOOVV 2.
3.
4.
viii
13. Presentation of secondary data
The following socioeconomic indicators were selected for each country to complement
the country profile information. Indicators and their sources are included below.
1. Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs: http://esa.un.org/unpp
2. Gross national income (GNI) per capita (international $). PPP int. $ = Purchasing Power
Parity at international dollar rate (2008). World Development Indicators Database, 2009.
Washington, DC, World Bank, 2009: http://www.worldbank.org/data
3. World Bank income category. divided among income groups according to 2008 gross
national income (GNI) per capita, calculated using the World Bank Atlas method. The
groups are: low income, US$ 975 or less; lower-middle income, US$ 976–3855; upper-middle
income, US$ 3856–11 905; and high income, US$ 11 906 or more. http://www.
worldbank.org
4. Country grouping by OECD and non-OECD membership. For more information, see the
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: http://www.oecd.org
5. Life expectancy at birth in years (2007). WHO Global Atlas of the Health Workforce.
Geneva, World Health Organization, 2009: http://www.who.int/whosis/whostat/EN_
WHS09_Table1.pdf
6. Total health expenditure (% GDP). Total expenditure on health as percentage of
gross domestic product (2010). WHO National Health Accounts (NHA) Country health
expenditure database. Geneva, World Health Organization: http:www.who.int/nha/country
7. Per capita total health expenditure (PPP international $). PPP int. $ = Purchasing Power
Parity at international dollar rate (2010). WHO National Health Accounts (NHA) Country health
expenditure database. Geneva, World Health Organization: http://www.who.int/nha/country
8. Hospital bed density per 10 000 population (2008). WHO World Health Statistics.
Geneva, World Health Organization, 2009: http://www.who.int/whosis/whostat/EN_
WHS09_Table6.pdf
9. Physician density per 10 000 population (2007). WHO World Health Statistics. Geneva, World
Health Organization, 2009: http://www.who.int/whosis/whostat/EN_WHS09_Table6.pdf
10. Nurse density per 10 000 population (2007): WHO World Health Statistics. Geneva, World
Health Organization, 2009: http://www.who.int/whosis/whostat/EN_WHS09_Table6.pdf
11. ICT Development Index 2008. International Telecommunication Union ICT Statistics: http://
www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/publications/idi/2010/Material/MIS_2010_Summary_E.pdf
12. ICT Development Index rank 2008. International Telecommunication Union ICT Statistics:
http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/publications/idi/2010/Material/MIS_2010_Summary_E.pdf
13. Mobile cellular subscriptions per 100 population (2009). International Telecommunication
Union ICT Statistics: http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Indicators/Indicators.aspx#
14. Internet users per 100 population (2009). International Telecommunication Union ICT
Statistics: http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ICTEYE/Indicators/Indicators.aspx#
15. Age-standardized disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) per 100 000 population.
The sum of years of potential life lost due to premature mortality and the years of
productive life lost due to disability (2004). Department of Measurement and Health
Information, World Health Organization, 2008: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_
burden_disease/en/index.html
ix
22. 42 Nurse density (per 10 000 population) 5.0 'LVDELOLW$GMXVWHG/LIHHDUV'$/
23. 61 622
Sources: See page ix
1. eHealth foundation actions
H+HDOWKIRXQGDWLRQDFWLRQVEXLOGDQHQDEOLQJHQYLURQPHQWIRUWKHXVHRI,7IRUKHDOWK7KHVHLQFOXGHVXSSRUWLYHH+HDOWK
policy, legal and ethical frameworks; adequate funding from various sources; infrastructure development; and developing the
capacity of the health work force through training.
I. Policy framework
Country response Global response (%)§ Policy implemented Year of implementation
National eGovernment policy No 85E — —
1DWLRQDOH+HDOWKSROLF No 55E — —
1DWLRQDO,7SURFXUHPHQWSROLFIRUKHDOWKVHFWRU No 37E — —
1DWLRQDOPXOWLFXOWXUDOLVPSROLFIRUH+HDOWK No 30E — —
National telemedicine policy No 25c — —
II. Legal and ethical frameworks for eHealth
Country response Global response (%)a§
Legislation on personal and health-related data
7RHQVXUHSULYDFRISHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWD Yes 70
7RSURWHFWSHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWDVSHFLÀFDOOLQ(05RU(+51 No 31
Legislation for sharing health-related data between health care staff through EMR/EHR1
Within the same health care facility and its network of care providers No 26
With different health care entities within the country No 23
With health care entities in other countries No 11
Internet pharmacies
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFRSHUDWLRQV No $OORZV3URKLELWV
1DWLRQDOUHJXODWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQFHUWLÀFDWLRQRI,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFVLWHV No 7
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFSXUFKDVHVIURPRWKHUFRXQWULHV No $OORZV3URKLELWV
Internet safety
*RYHUQPHQWVSRQVRUHGLQLWLDWLYHVDERXW,QWHUQHWVDIHWDQGOLWHUDF No 47
6HFXULWWRROVUHTXLUHGEODZIRUIDFLOLWLHVXVHGEFKLOGUHQ No 22
Quality assurance approaches to health-related Internet content
9ROXQWDUFRPSOLDQFHEFRQWHQWSURYLGHUVRUZHEVLWHRZQHUV No data 56
7HFKQRORJWKURXJKÀOWHUVDQGFRQWUROV No data 28
Government intervention through laws or regulations No data 26
(GXFDWLRQSURJUDPPHVIRUFRQVXPHUVDQGSURIHVVLRQDOV No data 23
2IÀFLDODSSURYDOWKURXJKFHUWLÀFDWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQRUTXDOLWVHDOV No data 17
IV. Capacity building
Country response Global response (%)b§
ICT education
,7WUDLQLQJIRUVWXGHQWVLQKHDOWKVFLHQFHVDWWHUWLDULQVWLWXWLRQV No 77
,QVWLWXWLRQVRIIHUFRQWLQXLQJHGXFDWLRQLQ,7IRUKHDOWKSURIHVVLRQDOV No 75
Professional groups offered ICT continuing education
0HGLFDO — 73
Nursing — 62
3XEOLFKHDOWK — 60
Dentistry — 54
Pharmacy — 54
§,QGLFDWHVWKHSHUFHQWDJHRISDUWLFLSDWLQJ0HPEHU6WDWHVUHVSRQGLQJ´HVµ
III. eHealth expenditures and their funding source
Expenditure Public funding Private funding
Donor/non-public
funding
Public-private
partnerships funding
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
,7HTXLSPHQW — 78 — 37 — — 28
Software — 76 — 35 — 56 —
3LORWSURMHFWV — — 33 — 51 — 28
Skills training — 61 — 26 — 43 — 20
Ongoing support — 61 — — 35 — 18
Scholarships — 28 — 8 — — 4
27. I. Telemedicine
Country response Global response (%)c§
Telemedicine enabling actions
National telemedicine policy No 25
,PSOHPHQWHGQDWLRQDOWHOHPHGLFLQHSROLF — —
)RUPDOHYDOXDWLRQDQGRUSXEOLFDWLRQRIWHOHPHGLFLQHLQLWLDWLYHVVLQFH Yes 22
Barriers to implementing telemedicine solutions
Perceived costs too high No 60
Lack of legal policies/regulation No 40
Organizational culture not supportive No
Underdeveloped infrastructure No 38
Lack of policy frameworks No 37
RPSHWLQJSULRULWLHV No 37
/DFNRIGHPDQGEKHDOWKSURIHVVLRQDOV No 31
Lack of nationally adopted standards No 26
Lack of knowledge of applications No 25
Lack of technical expertise Yes 17
Information most needed in country to support telemedicine development
RVWDQGFRVWHIIHFWLYHQHVV No
OLQLFDOSRVVLELOLWLHV Yes 58
,QIUDVWUXFWXUH Yes 52
(YDOXDWLRQ No 46
Legal and ethical No 45
(IIHFWRQKXPDQUHVRXUFHV No 40
Patients' perception No 30
II. mHealth
Country response Global response (%)b§
mHealth initiatives
P+HDOWKLQLWLDWLYHVDUHFRQGXFWHGLQFRXQWU No 83
)RUPDOHYDOXDWLRQDQGRUSXEOLFDWLRQRIP+HDOWKLQLWLDWLYHV No 12
Barriers to implementing mHealth initiatives
RPSHWLQJSULRULWLHV Yes 53
Lack of knowledge of applications Yes 47
Lack of policy framework No 44
RVWHIIHFWLYHQHVVXQNQRZQ No 40
Lack of legal policies/regulation No 38
Perceived costs too high Yes 37
Lack of demand No
Underdeveloped infrastructure Yes 26
Lack of technical expertise No 26
IIIa. eLearning
Country response Global response (%)c§
eLearning in health sciences at the tertiary level
Used in teaching health sciences No 72
Used in training health professionals No
Barriers to eLearning
Underdeveloped infrastructure Yes 64
Lack of policy framework No 63
Lack of skilled course developers Yes 55
Lack of knowledge of applications No 46
Perceived costs too high Yes 45
$YDLODELOLWRIVXLWDEOHFRXUVHV Yes 42
Lack of demand No 21
IIIb. eLearning target groups
Profession Students Professionals
Country response Global response (%)c§ Country response Global response (%)c§
0HGLFDO — 68 — 71
3XEOLFKHDOWK — 52 — 56
Nursing — 50 — 55
Pharmacy — 45 — 37
Dentistry — — 37
a n=113
E n=112
c n=114
WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region
34. 73 Nurse density (per 10 000 population) 40.3 'LVDELOLW$GMXVWHG/LIHHDUV'$/
35. 16 106
Sources: See page ix
1. eHealth foundation actions
H+HDOWKIRXQGDWLRQDFWLRQVEXLOGDQHQDEOLQJHQYLURQPHQWIRUWKHXVHRI,7IRUKHDOWK7KHVHLQFOXGHVXSSRUWLYHH+HDOWK
policy, legal and ethical frameworks; adequate funding from various sources; infrastructure development; and developing the
capacity of the health work force through training.
I. Policy framework
Country response Global response (%)§ Policy implemented Year of implementation
National eGovernment policy Yes 85E Partly 2004
1DWLRQDOH+HDOWKSROLF Yes 55E Partly 2004
1DWLRQDO,7SURFXUHPHQWSROLFIRUKHDOWKVHFWRU Yes 37E Yes 2007
1DWLRQDOPXOWLFXOWXUDOLVPSROLFIRUH+HDOWK No 30E — —
National telemedicine policy No 25c — —
II. Legal and ethical frameworks for eHealth
Country response Global response (%)a§
Legislation on personal and health-related data
7RHQVXUHSULYDFRISHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWD Yes 70
7RSURWHFWSHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWDVSHFLÀFDOOLQ(05RU(+51 No 31
Legislation for sharing health-related data between health care staff through EMR/EHR1
Within the same health care facility and its network of care providers No 26
With different health care entities within the country No 23
With health care entities in other countries No 11
Internet pharmacies
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFRSHUDWLRQV No $OORZV3URKLELWV
1DWLRQDOUHJXODWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQFHUWLÀFDWLRQRI,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFVLWHV No 7
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFSXUFKDVHVIURPRWKHUFRXQWULHV No $OORZV3URKLELWV
Internet safety
*RYHUQPHQWVSRQVRUHGLQLWLDWLYHVDERXW,QWHUQHWVDIHWDQGOLWHUDF No 47
6HFXULWWRROVUHTXLUHGEODZIRUIDFLOLWLHVXVHGEFKLOGUHQ No 22
Quality assurance approaches to health-related Internet content
9ROXQWDUFRPSOLDQFHEFRQWHQWSURYLGHUVRUZHEVLWHRZQHUV No 56
7HFKQRORJWKURXJKÀOWHUVDQGFRQWUROV Yes 28
Government intervention through laws or regulations No 26
(GXFDWLRQSURJUDPPHVIRUFRQVXPHUVDQGSURIHVVLRQDOV No 23
2IÀFLDODSSURYDOWKURXJKFHUWLÀFDWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQRUTXDOLWVHDOV No 17
IV. Capacity building
Country response Global response (%)b§
ICT education
,7WUDLQLQJIRUVWXGHQWVLQKHDOWKVFLHQFHVDWWHUWLDULQVWLWXWLRQV Yes 77
,QVWLWXWLRQVRIIHUFRQWLQXLQJHGXFDWLRQLQ,7IRUKHDOWKSURIHVVLRQDOV Yes 75
Professional groups offered ICT continuing education
0HGLFDO No 73
Nursing No 62
3XEOLFKHDOWK Yes 60
Dentistry No 54
Pharmacy No 54
§,QGLFDWHVWKHSHUFHQWDJHRISDUWLFLSDWLQJ0HPEHU6WDWHVUHVSRQGLQJ´HVµ
III. eHealth expenditures and their funding source
Expenditure Public funding Private funding
Donor/non-public
funding
Public-private
partnerships funding
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
,7HTXLSPHQW Yes 78 — 37 Yes — 28
Software Yes 76 — 35 No 56 —
3LORWSURMHFWV No — 33 No 51 — 28
Skills training No 61 — 26 No 43 — 20
Ongoing support No 61 — No 35 — 18
Scholarships No 28 — 8 No — 4
39. I. Telemedicine
Country response Global response (%)c§
Telemedicine enabling actions
National telemedicine policy No 25
,PSOHPHQWHGQDWLRQDOWHOHPHGLFLQHSROLF — —
)RUPDOHYDOXDWLRQDQGRUSXEOLFDWLRQRIWHOHPHGLFLQHLQLWLDWLYHVVLQFH No 22
Barriers to implementing telemedicine solutions
Perceived costs too high No 60
Lack of legal policies/regulation No 40
Organizational culture not supportive No
Underdeveloped infrastructure No 38
Lack of policy frameworks Yes 37
RPSHWLQJSULRULWLHV Yes 37
/DFNRIGHPDQGEKHDOWKSURIHVVLRQDOV No 31
Lack of nationally adopted standards Yes 26
Lack of knowledge of applications No 25
Lack of technical expertise Yes 17
Information most needed in country to support telemedicine development
RVWDQGFRVWHIIHFWLYHQHVV Yes
OLQLFDOSRVVLELOLWLHV No 58
,QIUDVWUXFWXUH No 52
(YDOXDWLRQ Yes 46
Legal and ethical Yes 45
(IIHFWRQKXPDQUHVRXUFHV No 40
Patients' perception Yes 30
II. mHealth
Country response Global response (%)b§
mHealth initiatives
P+HDOWKLQLWLDWLYHVDUHFRQGXFWHGLQFRXQWU Yes 83
)RUPDOHYDOXDWLRQDQGRUSXEOLFDWLRQRIP+HDOWKLQLWLDWLYHV No 12
Barriers to implementing mHealth initiatives
RPSHWLQJSULRULWLHV Yes 53
Lack of knowledge of applications No 47
Lack of policy framework Yes 44
RVWHIIHFWLYHQHVVXQNQRZQ No 40
Lack of legal policies/regulation No 38
Perceived costs too high No 37
Lack of demand No
Underdeveloped infrastructure Yes 26
Lack of technical expertise Yes 26
IIIa. eLearning
Country response Global response (%)c§
eLearning in health sciences at the tertiary level
Used in teaching health sciences No 72
Used in training health professionals No
Barriers to eLearning
Underdeveloped infrastructure Yes 64
Lack of policy framework Yes 63
Lack of skilled course developers No 55
Lack of knowledge of applications Yes 46
Perceived costs too high No 45
$YDLODELOLWRIVXLWDEOHFRXUVHV Yes 42
Lack of demand No 21
IIIb. eLearning target groups
Profession Students Professionals
Country response Global response (%)c§ Country response Global response (%)c§
0HGLFDO — 68 — 71
3XEOLFKHDOWK — 52 — 56
Nursing — 50 — 55
Pharmacy — 45 — 37
Dentistry — — 37
a n=113
E n=112
c n=114
WHO European Region
46. 76 Nurse density (per 10 000 population) 4.8 'LVDELOLW$GMXVWHG/LIHHDUV'$/
47. 15 371
Sources: See page ix
1. eHealth foundation actions
H+HDOWKIRXQGDWLRQDFWLRQVEXLOGDQHQDEOLQJHQYLURQPHQWIRUWKHXVHRI,7IRUKHDOWK7KHVHLQFOXGHVXSSRUWLYHH+HDOWK
policy, legal and ethical frameworks; adequate funding from various sources; infrastructure development; and developing the
capacity of the health work force through training.
I. Policy framework
Country response Global response (%)§ Policy implemented Year of implementation
National eGovernment policy Yes 85E Partly 2005
1DWLRQDOH+HDOWKSROLF No 55E — —
1DWLRQDO,7SURFXUHPHQWSROLFIRUKHDOWKVHFWRU No 37E — —
1DWLRQDOPXOWLFXOWXUDOLVPSROLFIRUH+HDOWK No 30E — —
National telemedicine policy No 25c — —
II. Legal and ethical frameworks for eHealth
Country response Global response (%)a§
Legislation on personal and health-related data
7RHQVXUHSULYDFRISHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWD Yes 70
7RSURWHFWSHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWDVSHFLÀFDOOLQ(05RU(+51 Yes 31
Legislation for sharing health-related data between health care staff through EMR/EHR1
Within the same health care facility and its network of care providers No 26
With different health care entities within the country No 23
With health care entities in other countries No 11
Internet pharmacies
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFRSHUDWLRQV Prohibits $OORZV3URKLELWV
1DWLRQDOUHJXODWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQFHUWLÀFDWLRQRI,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFVLWHV No 7
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFSXUFKDVHVIURPRWKHUFRXQWULHV Do not know $OORZV3URKLELWV
Internet safety
*RYHUQPHQWVSRQVRUHGLQLWLDWLYHVDERXW,QWHUQHWVDIHWDQGOLWHUDF Yes 47
6HFXULWWRROVUHTXLUHGEODZIRUIDFLOLWLHVXVHGEFKLOGUHQ Do not know 22
Quality assurance approaches to health-related Internet content
9ROXQWDUFRPSOLDQFHEFRQWHQWSURYLGHUVRUZHEVLWHRZQHUV Yes 56
7HFKQRORJWKURXJKÀOWHUVDQGFRQWUROV No 28
Government intervention through laws or regulations No 26
(GXFDWLRQSURJUDPPHVIRUFRQVXPHUVDQGSURIHVVLRQDOV No 23
2IÀFLDODSSURYDOWKURXJKFHUWLÀFDWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQRUTXDOLWVHDOV No 17
IV. Capacity building
Country response Global response (%)b§
ICT education
,7WUDLQLQJIRUVWXGHQWVLQKHDOWKVFLHQFHVDWWHUWLDULQVWLWXWLRQV Yes 77
,QVWLWXWLRQVRIIHUFRQWLQXLQJHGXFDWLRQLQ,7IRUKHDOWKSURIHVVLRQDOV Yes 75
Professional groups offered ICT continuing education
0HGLFDO Yes 73
Nursing Yes 62
3XEOLFKHDOWK Yes 60
Dentistry Yes 54
Pharmacy Yes 54
§,QGLFDWHVWKHSHUFHQWDJHRISDUWLFLSDWLQJ0HPEHU6WDWHVUHVSRQGLQJ´HVµ
III. eHealth expenditures and their funding source
Expenditure Public funding Private funding
Donor/non-public
funding
Public-private
partnerships funding
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
,7HTXLSPHQW Yes 78 Yes 37 Yes Yes 28
Software Yes 76 Yes 35 Yes 56 Yes
3LORWSURMHFWV Yes Yes 33 Yes 51 Yes 28
Skills training No 61 No 26 No 43 No 20
Ongoing support No 61 No No 35 No 18
Scholarships No 28 No 8 No No 4
51. I. Telemedicine
Country response Global response (%)c§
Telemedicine enabling actions
National telemedicine policy No 25
,PSOHPHQWHGQDWLRQDOWHOHPHGLFLQHSROLF — —
)RUPDOHYDOXDWLRQDQGRUSXEOLFDWLRQRIWHOHPHGLFLQHLQLWLDWLYHVVLQFH No 22
Barriers to implementing telemedicine solutions
Perceived costs too high No 60
Lack of legal policies/regulation Yes 40
Organizational culture not supportive Yes
Underdeveloped infrastructure No 38
Lack of policy frameworks Yes 37
RPSHWLQJSULRULWLHV Yes 37
/DFNRIGHPDQGEKHDOWKSURIHVVLRQDOV Yes 31
Lack of nationally adopted standards No 26
Lack of knowledge of applications Yes 25
Lack of technical expertise No 17
Information most needed in country to support telemedicine development
RVWDQGFRVWHIIHFWLYHQHVV Yes
OLQLFDOSRVVLELOLWLHV No 58
,QIUDVWUXFWXUH Yes 52
(YDOXDWLRQ Yes 46
Legal and ethical Yes 45
(IIHFWRQKXPDQUHVRXUFHV Yes 40
Patients' perception Yes 30
II. mHealth
Country response Global response (%)b§
mHealth initiatives
P+HDOWKLQLWLDWLYHVDUHFRQGXFWHGLQFRXQWU Yes 83
)RUPDOHYDOXDWLRQDQGRUSXEOLFDWLRQRIP+HDOWKLQLWLDWLYHV No data 12
Barriers to implementing mHealth initiatives
RPSHWLQJSULRULWLHV Yes 53
Lack of knowledge of applications No 47
Lack of policy framework No 44
RVWHIIHFWLYHQHVVXQNQRZQ Yes 40
Lack of legal policies/regulation Yes 38
Perceived costs too high No 37
Lack of demand Yes
Underdeveloped infrastructure No 26
Lack of technical expertise No 26
IIIa. eLearning
Country response Global response (%)c§
eLearning in health sciences at the tertiary level
Used in teaching health sciences Yes 72
Used in training health professionals Yes
Barriers to eLearning
Underdeveloped infrastructure Yes 64
Lack of policy framework Yes 63
Lack of skilled course developers No 55
Lack of knowledge of applications No 46
Perceived costs too high No 45
$YDLODELOLWRIVXLWDEOHFRXUVHV No 42
Lack of demand Yes 21
IIIb. eLearning target groups
Profession Students Professionals
Country response Global response (%)c§ Country response Global response (%)c§
0HGLFDO Yes 68 Yes 71
3XEOLFKHDOWK Yes 52 Yes 56
Nursing Yes 50 Yes 55
Pharmacy Yes 45 Yes 37
Dentistry Yes Yes 37
a n=113
E n=112
c n=114
WHO Region of the Americas
58. 70 Nurse density (per 10 000 population) 48.7 'LVDELOLW$GMXVWHG/LIHHDUV'$/
59. 18 411
Sources: See page ix
1. eHealth foundation actions
H+HDOWKIRXQGDWLRQDFWLRQVEXLOGDQHQDEOLQJHQYLURQPHQWIRUWKHXVHRI,7IRUKHDOWK7KHVHLQFOXGHVXSSRUWLYHH+HDOWK
policy, legal and ethical frameworks; adequate funding from various sources; infrastructure development; and developing the
capacity of the health work force through training.
I. Policy framework
Country response Global response (%)§ Policy implemented Year of implementation
National eGovernment policy No 85E — —
1DWLRQDOH+HDOWKSROLF No 55E — —
1DWLRQDO,7SURFXUHPHQWSROLFIRUKHDOWKVHFWRU No 37E — —
1DWLRQDOPXOWLFXOWXUDOLVPSROLFIRUH+HDOWK No 30E — —
National telemedicine policy No 25c — —
II. Legal and ethical frameworks for eHealth
Country response Global response (%)a§
Legislation on personal and health-related data
7RHQVXUHSULYDFRISHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWD Yes 70
7RSURWHFWSHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWDVSHFLÀFDOOLQ(05RU(+51 Do not know 31
Legislation for sharing health-related data between health care staff through EMR/EHR1
Within the same health care facility and its network of care providers Do not know 26
With different health care entities within the country No 23
With health care entities in other countries No 11
Internet pharmacies
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFRSHUDWLRQV Do not know $OORZV3URKLELWV
1DWLRQDOUHJXODWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQFHUWLÀFDWLRQRI,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFVLWHV Do not know 7
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFSXUFKDVHVIURPRWKHUFRXQWULHV Do not know $OORZV3URKLELWV
Internet safety
*RYHUQPHQWVSRQVRUHGLQLWLDWLYHVDERXW,QWHUQHWVDIHWDQGOLWHUDF No 47
6HFXULWWRROVUHTXLUHGEODZIRUIDFLOLWLHVXVHGEFKLOGUHQ No 22
Quality assurance approaches to health-related Internet content
9ROXQWDUFRPSOLDQFHEFRQWHQWSURYLGHUVRUZHEVLWHRZQHUV No data 56
7HFKQRORJWKURXJKÀOWHUVDQGFRQWUROV No data 28
Government intervention through laws or regulations No data 26
(GXFDWLRQSURJUDPPHVIRUFRQVXPHUVDQGSURIHVVLRQDOV No data 23
2IÀFLDODSSURYDOWKURXJKFHUWLÀFDWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQRUTXDOLWVHDOV No data 17
IV. Capacity building
Country response Global response (%)b§
ICT education
,7WUDLQLQJIRUVWXGHQWVLQKHDOWKVFLHQFHVDWWHUWLDULQVWLWXWLRQV Yes 77
,QVWLWXWLRQVRIIHUFRQWLQXLQJHGXFDWLRQLQ,7IRUKHDOWKSURIHVVLRQDOV No 75
Professional groups offered ICT continuing education
0HGLFDO — 73
Nursing — 62
3XEOLFKHDOWK — 60
Dentistry — 54
Pharmacy — 54
§,QGLFDWHVWKHSHUFHQWDJHRISDUWLFLSDWLQJ0HPEHU6WDWHVUHVSRQGLQJ´HVµ
III. eHealth expenditures and their funding source
Expenditure Public funding Private funding
Donor/non-public
funding
Public-private
partnerships funding
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
,7HTXLSPHQW No 78 Yes 37 Yes — 28
Software No 76 Yes 35 Yes 56 —
3LORWSURMHFWV No Yes 33 Yes 51 — 28
Skills training No 61 Yes 26 Yes 43 — 20
Ongoing support No 61 No No 35 — 18
Scholarships No 28 No 8 Yes — 4
63. I. Telemedicine
Country response Global response (%)c§
Telemedicine enabling actions
National telemedicine policy No 25
,PSOHPHQWHGQDWLRQDOWHOHPHGLFLQHSROLF — —
)RUPDOHYDOXDWLRQDQGRUSXEOLFDWLRQRIWHOHPHGLFLQHLQLWLDWLYHVVLQFH No 22
Barriers to implementing telemedicine solutions
Perceived costs too high Yes 60
Lack of legal policies/regulation Yes 40
Organizational culture not supportive No
Underdeveloped infrastructure No 38
Lack of policy frameworks Yes 37
RPSHWLQJSULRULWLHV No 37
/DFNRIGHPDQGEKHDOWKSURIHVVLRQDOV Yes 31
Lack of nationally adopted standards No 26
Lack of knowledge of applications No 25
Lack of technical expertise No 17
Information most needed in country to support telemedicine development
RVWDQGFRVWHIIHFWLYHQHVV Yes
OLQLFDOSRVVLELOLWLHV Yes 58
,QIUDVWUXFWXUH No 52
(YDOXDWLRQ Yes 46
Legal and ethical No 45
(IIHFWRQKXPDQUHVRXUFHV No 40
Patients' perception Yes 30
II. mHealth
Country response Global response (%)b§
mHealth initiatives
P+HDOWKLQLWLDWLYHVDUHFRQGXFWHGLQFRXQWU No 83
)RUPDOHYDOXDWLRQDQGRUSXEOLFDWLRQRIP+HDOWKLQLWLDWLYHV No data 12
Barriers to implementing mHealth initiatives
RPSHWLQJSULRULWLHV Yes 53
Lack of knowledge of applications Yes 47
Lack of policy framework Yes 44
RVWHIIHFWLYHQHVVXQNQRZQ No 40
Lack of legal policies/regulation No 38
Perceived costs too high No 37
Lack of demand Yes
Underdeveloped infrastructure No 26
Lack of technical expertise No 26
IIIa. eLearning
Country response Global response (%)c§
eLearning in health sciences at the tertiary level
Used in teaching health sciences Yes 72
Used in training health professionals Yes
Barriers to eLearning
Underdeveloped infrastructure No 64
Lack of policy framework Yes 63
Lack of skilled course developers Yes 55
Lack of knowledge of applications Yes 46
Perceived costs too high No 45
$YDLODELOLWRIVXLWDEOHFRXUVHV No 42
Lack of demand Yes 21
IIIb. eLearning target groups
Profession Students Professionals
Country response Global response (%)c§ Country response Global response (%)c§
0HGLFDO Yes 68 Yes 71
3XEOLFKHDOWK Yes 52 Yes 56
Nursing Yes 50 No 55
Pharmacy Yes 45 No 37
Dentistry Yes No 37
a n=113
E n=112
c n=114
WHO European Region
70. 80 Nurse density (per 10 000 population) 66.4 'LVDELOLW$GMXVWHG/LIHHDUV'$/
71. 10 223
Sources: See page ix
1. eHealth foundation actions
H+HDOWKIRXQGDWLRQDFWLRQVEXLOGDQHQDEOLQJHQYLURQPHQWIRUWKHXVHRI,7IRUKHDOWK7KHVHLQFOXGHVXSSRUWLYHH+HDOWK
policy, legal and ethical frameworks; adequate funding from various sources; infrastructure development; and developing the
capacity of the health work force through training.
I. Policy framework
Country response Global response (%)§ Policy implemented Year of implementation
National eGovernment policy Yes 85E Partly 2006
1DWLRQDOH+HDOWKSROLF Yes 55E Partly 2006
1DWLRQDO,7SURFXUHPHQWSROLFIRUKHDOWKVHFWRU No 37E — —
1DWLRQDOPXOWLFXOWXUDOLVPSROLFIRUH+HDOWK No 30E — —
National telemedicine policy Yes 25c Partly —
II. Legal and ethical frameworks for eHealth
Country response Global response (%)a§
Legislation on personal and health-related data
7RHQVXUHSULYDFRISHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWD Yes 70
7RSURWHFWSHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWDVSHFLÀFDOOLQ(05RU(+51 Yes 31
Legislation for sharing health-related data between health care staff through EMR/EHR1
Within the same health care facility and its network of care providers No 26
With different health care entities within the country No 23
With health care entities in other countries No 11
Internet pharmacies
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFRSHUDWLRQV Prohibits $OORZV3URKLELWV
1DWLRQDOUHJXODWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQFHUWLÀFDWLRQRI,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFVLWHV No 7
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFSXUFKDVHVIURPRWKHUFRXQWULHV No $OORZV3URKLELWV
Internet safety
*RYHUQPHQWVSRQVRUHGLQLWLDWLYHVDERXW,QWHUQHWVDIHWDQGOLWHUDF Yes 47
6HFXULWWRROVUHTXLUHGEODZIRUIDFLOLWLHVXVHGEFKLOGUHQ Do not know 22
Quality assurance approaches to health-related Internet content
9ROXQWDUFRPSOLDQFHEFRQWHQWSURYLGHUVRUZHEVLWHRZQHUV Yes 56
7HFKQRORJWKURXJKÀOWHUVDQGFRQWUROV No 28
Government intervention through laws or regulations No 26
(GXFDWLRQSURJUDPPHVIRUFRQVXPHUVDQGSURIHVVLRQDOV No 23
2IÀFLDODSSURYDOWKURXJKFHUWLÀFDWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQRUTXDOLWVHDOV No 17
IV. Capacity building
Country response Global response (%)b§
ICT education
,7WUDLQLQJIRUVWXGHQWVLQKHDOWKVFLHQFHVDWWHUWLDULQVWLWXWLRQV Yes 77
,QVWLWXWLRQVRIIHUFRQWLQXLQJHGXFDWLRQLQ,7IRUKHDOWKSURIHVVLRQDOV Yes 75
Professional groups offered ICT continuing education
0HGLFDO Yes 73
Nursing No 62
3XEOLFKHDOWK No 60
Dentistry Yes 54
Pharmacy No 54
§,QGLFDWHVWKHSHUFHQWDJHRISDUWLFLSDWLQJ0HPEHU6WDWHVUHVSRQGLQJ´HVµ
III. eHealth expenditures and their funding source
Expenditure Public funding Private funding
Donor/non-public
funding
Public-private
partnerships funding
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
,7HTXLSPHQW Yes 78 Yes 37 No Yes 28
Software Yes 76 Yes 35 No 56 Yes
3LORWSURMHFWV Yes Yes 33 Yes 51 Yes 28
Skills training Yes 61 Yes 26 No 43 No 20
Ongoing support Yes 61 Yes No 35 No 18
Scholarships Yes 28 Yes 8 No No 4
75. I. Telemedicine
Country response Global response (%)c§
Telemedicine enabling actions
National telemedicine policy Yes 25
,PSOHPHQWHGQDWLRQDOWHOHPHGLFLQHSROLF Partly —
)RUPDOHYDOXDWLRQDQGRUSXEOLFDWLRQRIWHOHPHGLFLQHLQLWLDWLYHVVLQFH Yes 22
Barriers to implementing telemedicine solutions
Perceived costs too high No 60
Lack of legal policies/regulation No 40
Organizational culture not supportive Yes
Underdeveloped infrastructure No 38
Lack of policy frameworks No 37
RPSHWLQJSULRULWLHV Yes 37
/DFNRIGHPDQGEKHDOWKSURIHVVLRQDOV Yes 31
Lack of nationally adopted standards No 26
Lack of knowledge of applications Yes 25
Lack of technical expertise No 17
Information most needed in country to support telemedicine development
RVWDQGFRVWHIIHFWLYHQHVV Yes
OLQLFDOSRVVLELOLWLHV Yes 58
,QIUDVWUXFWXUH No 52
(YDOXDWLRQ Yes 46
Legal and ethical Yes 45
(IIHFWRQKXPDQUHVRXUFHV Yes 40
Patients' perception Yes 30
II. mHealth
Country response Global response (%)b§
mHealth initiatives
P+HDOWKLQLWLDWLYHVDUHFRQGXFWHGLQFRXQWU Yes 83
)RUPDOHYDOXDWLRQDQGRUSXEOLFDWLRQRIP+HDOWKLQLWLDWLYHV Yes 12
Barriers to implementing mHealth initiatives
RPSHWLQJSULRULWLHV Yes 53
Lack of knowledge of applications Yes 47
Lack of policy framework No 44
RVWHIIHFWLYHQHVVXQNQRZQ Yes 40
Lack of legal policies/regulation Yes 38
Perceived costs too high No 37
Lack of demand No
Underdeveloped infrastructure No 26
Lack of technical expertise No 26
IIIa. eLearning
Country response Global response (%)c§
eLearning in health sciences at the tertiary level
Used in teaching health sciences Yes 72
Used in training health professionals Yes
Barriers to eLearning
Underdeveloped infrastructure No 64
Lack of policy framework No 63
Lack of skilled course developers Yes 55
Lack of knowledge of applications No 46
Perceived costs too high Yes 45
$YDLODELOLWRIVXLWDEOHFRXUVHV Yes 42
Lack of demand No 21
IIIb. eLearning target groups
Profession Students Professionals
Country response Global response (%)c§ Country response Global response (%)c§
0HGLFDO Yes 68 No 71
3XEOLFKHDOWK Yes 52 Yes 56
Nursing No 50 Yes 55
Pharmacy No 45 No 37
Dentistry Yes No 37
a n=113
E n=112
c n=114
WHO European Region
82. 68 Nurse density (per 10 000 population) 84.2 'LVDELOLW$GMXVWHG/LIHHDUV'$/
83. 21 525
Sources: See page ix
1. eHealth foundation actions
H+HDOWKIRXQGDWLRQDFWLRQVEXLOGDQHQDEOLQJHQYLURQPHQWIRUWKHXVHRI,7IRUKHDOWK7KHVHLQFOXGHVXSSRUWLYHH+HDOWK
policy, legal and ethical frameworks; adequate funding from various sources; infrastructure development; and developing the
capacity of the health work force through training.
I. Policy framework
Country response Global response (%)§ Policy implemented Year of implementation
National eGovernment policy Yes 85E Partly 2003
1DWLRQDOH+HDOWKSROLF Yes 55E Partly 2005
1DWLRQDO,7SURFXUHPHQWSROLFIRUKHDOWKVHFWRU No 37E — —
1DWLRQDOPXOWLFXOWXUDOLVPSROLFIRUH+HDOWK No 30E — —
National telemedicine policy No 25c — —
II. Legal and ethical frameworks for eHealth
Country response Global response (%)a§
Legislation on personal and health-related data
7RHQVXUHSULYDFRISHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWD Yes 70
7RSURWHFWSHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWDVSHFLÀFDOOLQ(05RU(+51 No 31
Legislation for sharing health-related data between health care staff through EMR/EHR1
Within the same health care facility and its network of care providers No 26
With different health care entities within the country No 23
With health care entities in other countries No 11
Internet pharmacies
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFRSHUDWLRQV No $OORZV3URKLELWV
1DWLRQDOUHJXODWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQFHUWLÀFDWLRQRI,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFVLWHV No 7
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFSXUFKDVHVIURPRWKHUFRXQWULHV No $OORZV3URKLELWV
Internet safety
*RYHUQPHQWVSRQVRUHGLQLWLDWLYHVDERXW,QWHUQHWVDIHWDQGOLWHUDF Yes 47
6HFXULWWRROVUHTXLUHGEODZIRUIDFLOLWLHVXVHGEFKLOGUHQ Yes 22
Quality assurance approaches to health-related Internet content
9ROXQWDUFRPSOLDQFHEFRQWHQWSURYLGHUVRUZHEVLWHRZQHUV Yes 56
7HFKQRORJWKURXJKÀOWHUVDQGFRQWUROV No 28
Government intervention through laws or regulations No 26
(GXFDWLRQSURJUDPPHVIRUFRQVXPHUVDQGSURIHVVLRQDOV No 23
2IÀFLDODSSURYDOWKURXJKFHUWLÀFDWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQRUTXDOLWVHDOV No 17
IV. Capacity building
Country response Global response (%)b§
ICT education
,7WUDLQLQJIRUVWXGHQWVLQKHDOWKVFLHQFHVDWWHUWLDULQVWLWXWLRQV Yes 77
,QVWLWXWLRQVRIIHUFRQWLQXLQJHGXFDWLRQLQ,7IRUKHDOWKSURIHVVLRQDOV Yes 75
Professional groups offered ICT continuing education
0HGLFDO Yes 73
Nursing Yes 62
3XEOLFKHDOWK Yes 60
Dentistry No 54
Pharmacy No 54
§,QGLFDWHVWKHSHUFHQWDJHRISDUWLFLSDWLQJ0HPEHU6WDWHVUHVSRQGLQJ´HVµ
III. eHealth expenditures and their funding source
Expenditure Public funding Private funding
Donor/non-public
funding
Public-private
partnerships funding
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
,7HTXLSPHQW Yes 78 — 37 Yes — 28
Software Yes 76 — 35 Yes 56 —
3LORWSURMHFWV Yes — 33 Yes 51 — 28
Skills training Yes 61 — 26 Yes 43 — 20
Ongoing support No 61 — No 35 — 18
Scholarships No 28 — 8 No — 4
87. I. Telemedicine
Country response Global response (%)c§
Telemedicine enabling actions
National telemedicine policy No 25
,PSOHPHQWHGQDWLRQDOWHOHPHGLFLQHSROLF — —
)RUPDOHYDOXDWLRQDQGRUSXEOLFDWLRQRIWHOHPHGLFLQHLQLWLDWLYHVVLQFH No 22
Barriers to implementing telemedicine solutions
Perceived costs too high No 60
Lack of legal policies/regulation Yes 40
Organizational culture not supportive Yes
Underdeveloped infrastructure Yes 38
Lack of policy frameworks No 37
RPSHWLQJSULRULWLHV No 37
/DFNRIGHPDQGEKHDOWKSURIHVVLRQDOV Yes 31
Lack of nationally adopted standards No 26
Lack of knowledge of applications No 25
Lack of technical expertise Yes 17
Information most needed in country to support telemedicine development
RVWDQGFRVWHIIHFWLYHQHVV Yes
OLQLFDOSRVVLELOLWLHV Yes 58
,QIUDVWUXFWXUH Yes 52
(YDOXDWLRQ No 46
Legal and ethical Yes 45
(IIHFWRQKXPDQUHVRXUFHV No 40
Patients' perception No 30
II. mHealth
Country response Global response (%)b§
mHealth initiatives
P+HDOWKLQLWLDWLYHVDUHFRQGXFWHGLQFRXQWU Yes 83
)RUPDOHYDOXDWLRQDQGRUSXEOLFDWLRQRIP+HDOWKLQLWLDWLYHV No 12
Barriers to implementing mHealth initiatives
RPSHWLQJSULRULWLHV No 53
Lack of knowledge of applications Yes 47
Lack of policy framework No 44
RVWHIIHFWLYHQHVVXQNQRZQ No 40
Lack of legal policies/regulation No 38
Perceived costs too high Yes 37
Lack of demand No
Underdeveloped infrastructure Yes 26
Lack of technical expertise Yes 26
IIIa. eLearning
Country response Global response (%)c§
eLearning in health sciences at the tertiary level
Used in teaching health sciences Yes 72
Used in training health professionals Yes
Barriers to eLearning
Underdeveloped infrastructure Yes 64
Lack of policy framework No 63
Lack of skilled course developers Yes 55
Lack of knowledge of applications Yes 46
Perceived costs too high No 45
$YDLODELOLWRIVXLWDEOHFRXUVHV No 42
Lack of demand No 21
IIIb. eLearning target groups
Profession Students Professionals
Country response Global response (%)c§ Country response Global response (%)c§
0HGLFDO Yes 68 Yes 71
3XEOLFKHDOWK No 52 Yes 56
Nursing No 50 No 55
Pharmacy No 45 No 37
Dentistry No No 37
a n=113
E n=112
c n=114
WHO European Region
94. 65 Nurse density (per 10 000 population) 2.8 'LVDELOLW$GMXVWHG/LIHHDUV'$/
95. 27 532
Sources: See page ix
1. eHealth foundation actions
H+HDOWKIRXQGDWLRQDFWLRQVEXLOGDQHQDEOLQJHQYLURQPHQWIRUWKHXVHRI,7IRUKHDOWK7KHVHLQFOXGHVXSSRUWLYHH+HDOWK
policy, legal and ethical frameworks; adequate funding from various sources; infrastructure development; and developing the
capacity of the health work force through training.
I. Policy framework
Country response Global response (%)§ Policy implemented Year of implementation
National eGovernment policy Yes 85E Partly 2002
1DWLRQDOH+HDOWKSROLF No 55E — —
1DWLRQDO,7SURFXUHPHQWSROLFIRUKHDOWKVHFWRU No 37E — —
1DWLRQDOPXOWLFXOWXUDOLVPSROLFIRUH+HDOWK Yes 30E Partly 2007
National telemedicine policy No 25c — —
II. Legal and ethical frameworks for eHealth
Country response Global response (%)a§
Legislation on personal and health-related data
7RHQVXUHSULYDFRISHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWD No 70
7RSURWHFWSHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWDVSHFLÀFDOOLQ(05RU(+51 No 31
Legislation for sharing health-related data between health care staff through EMR/EHR1
Within the same health care facility and its network of care providers No 26
With different health care entities within the country No 23
With health care entities in other countries No 11
Internet pharmacies
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFRSHUDWLRQV No $OORZV3URKLELWV
1DWLRQDOUHJXODWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQFHUWLÀFDWLRQRI,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFVLWHV No 7
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFSXUFKDVHVIURPRWKHUFRXQWULHV No $OORZV3URKLELWV
Internet safety
*RYHUQPHQWVSRQVRUHGLQLWLDWLYHVDERXW,QWHUQHWVDIHWDQGOLWHUDF No 47
6HFXULWWRROVUHTXLUHGEODZIRUIDFLOLWLHVXVHGEFKLOGUHQ No 22
Quality assurance approaches to health-related Internet content
9ROXQWDUFRPSOLDQFHEFRQWHQWSURYLGHUVRUZHEVLWHRZQHUV Yes 56
7HFKQRORJWKURXJKÀOWHUVDQGFRQWUROV No 28
Government intervention through laws or regulations No 26
(GXFDWLRQSURJUDPPHVIRUFRQVXPHUVDQGSURIHVVLRQDOV No 23
2IÀFLDODSSURYDOWKURXJKFHUWLÀFDWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQRUTXDOLWVHDOV No 17
IV. Capacity building
Country response Global response (%)b§
ICT education
,7WUDLQLQJIRUVWXGHQWVLQKHDOWKVFLHQFHVDWWHUWLDULQVWLWXWLRQV No 77
,QVWLWXWLRQVRIIHUFRQWLQXLQJHGXFDWLRQLQ,7IRUKHDOWKSURIHVVLRQDOV Yes 75
Professional groups offered ICT continuing education
0HGLFDO Yes 73
Nursing Yes 62
3XEOLFKHDOWK Yes 60
Dentistry Yes 54
Pharmacy Yes 54
§,QGLFDWHVWKHSHUFHQWDJHRISDUWLFLSDWLQJ0HPEHU6WDWHVUHVSRQGLQJ´HVµ
III. eHealth expenditures and their funding source
Expenditure Public funding Private funding
Donor/non-public
funding
Public-private
partnerships funding
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
,7HTXLSPHQW Yes 78 Yes 37 Yes — 28
Software Yes 76 Yes 35 Yes 56 —
3LORWSURMHFWV Yes Yes 33 Yes 51 — 28
Skills training Yes 61 Yes 26 Yes 43 — 20
Ongoing support Yes 61 Yes Yes 35 — 18
Scholarships No 28 No 8 No — 4
99. I. Telemedicine
Country response Global response (%)c§
Telemedicine enabling actions
National telemedicine policy No 25
,PSOHPHQWHGQDWLRQDOWHOHPHGLFLQHSROLF — —
)RUPDOHYDOXDWLRQDQGRUSXEOLFDWLRQRIWHOHPHGLFLQHLQLWLDWLYHVVLQFH No 22
Barriers to implementing telemedicine solutions
Perceived costs too high Yes 60
Lack of legal policies/regulation No 40
Organizational culture not supportive No
Underdeveloped infrastructure Yes 38
Lack of policy frameworks No 37
RPSHWLQJSULRULWLHV No 37
/DFNRIGHPDQGEKHDOWKSURIHVVLRQDOV No 31
Lack of nationally adopted standards No 26
Lack of knowledge of applications Yes 25
Lack of technical expertise Yes 17
Information most needed in country to support telemedicine development
RVWDQGFRVWHIIHFWLYHQHVV Yes
OLQLFDOSRVVLELOLWLHV Yes 58
,QIUDVWUXFWXUH Yes 52
(YDOXDWLRQ No 46
Legal and ethical No 45
(IIHFWRQKXPDQUHVRXUFHV No 40
Patients' perception Yes 30
II. mHealth
Country response Global response (%)b§
mHealth initiatives
P+HDOWKLQLWLDWLYHVDUHFRQGXFWHGLQFRXQWU Yes 83
)RUPDOHYDOXDWLRQDQGRUSXEOLFDWLRQRIP+HDOWKLQLWLDWLYHV No 12
Barriers to implementing mHealth initiatives
RPSHWLQJSULRULWLHV No 53
Lack of knowledge of applications Yes 47
Lack of policy framework Yes 44
RVWHIIHFWLYHQHVVXQNQRZQ Yes 40
Lack of legal policies/regulation No 38
Perceived costs too high No 37
Lack of demand No
Underdeveloped infrastructure No 26
Lack of technical expertise Yes 26
IIIa. eLearning
Country response Global response (%)c§
eLearning in health sciences at the tertiary level
Used in teaching health sciences No 72
Used in training health professionals No
Barriers to eLearning
Underdeveloped infrastructure No 64
Lack of policy framework Yes 63
Lack of skilled course developers Yes 55
Lack of knowledge of applications Yes 46
Perceived costs too high No 45
$YDLODELOLWRIVXLWDEOHFRXUVHV No 42
Lack of demand No 21
IIIb. eLearning target groups
Profession Students Professionals
Country response Global response (%)c§ Country response Global response (%)c§
0HGLFDO — 68 — 71
3XEOLFKHDOWK — 52 — 56
Nursing — 50 — 55
Pharmacy — 45 — 37
Dentistry — — 37
a n=113
E n=112
c n=114
WHO South-East Asia Region
106. 70 Nurse density (per 10 000 population) 125.6 'LVDELOLW$GMXVWHG/LIHHDUV'$/
107. Sources: See page ix
1. eHealth foundation actions
H+HDOWKIRXQGDWLRQDFWLRQVEXLOGDQHQDEOLQJHQYLURQPHQWIRUWKHXVHRI,7IRUKHDOWK7KHVHLQFOXGHVXSSRUWLYHH+HDOWK
policy, legal and ethical frameworks; adequate funding from various sources; infrastructure development; and developing the
capacity of the health work force through training.
I. Policy framework
Country response Global response (%)§ Policy implemented Year of implementation
National eGovernment policy Yes 85E Partly 2003
1DWLRQDOH+HDOWKSROLF No 55E — —
1DWLRQDO,7SURFXUHPHQWSROLFIRUKHDOWKVHFWRU No 37E — —
1DWLRQDOPXOWLFXOWXUDOLVPSROLFIRUH+HDOWK No 30E — —
National telemedicine policy No 25c — —
II. Legal and ethical frameworks for eHealth
Country response Global response (%)a§
Legislation on personal and health-related data
7RHQVXUHSULYDFRISHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWD Do not know 70
7RSURWHFWSHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWDVSHFLÀFDOOLQ(05RU(+51 No 31
Legislation for sharing health-related data between health care staff through EMR/EHR1
Within the same health care facility and its network of care providers No 26
With different health care entities within the country No 23
With health care entities in other countries No 11
Internet pharmacies
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFRSHUDWLRQV Do not know $OORZV3URKLELWV
1DWLRQDOUHJXODWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQFHUWLÀFDWLRQRI,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFVLWHV No 7
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFSXUFKDVHVIURPRWKHUFRXQWULHV No $OORZV3URKLELWV
Internet safety
*RYHUQPHQWVSRQVRUHGLQLWLDWLYHVDERXW,QWHUQHWVDIHWDQGOLWHUDF Do not know 47
6HFXULWWRROVUHTXLUHGEODZIRUIDFLOLWLHVXVHGEFKLOGUHQ Do not know 22
Quality assurance approaches to health-related Internet content
9ROXQWDUFRPSOLDQFHEFRQWHQWSURYLGHUVRUZHEVLWHRZQHUV Yes 56
7HFKQRORJWKURXJKÀOWHUVDQGFRQWUROV No 28
Government intervention through laws or regulations No 26
(GXFDWLRQSURJUDPPHVIRUFRQVXPHUVDQGSURIHVVLRQDOV Yes 23
2IÀFLDODSSURYDOWKURXJKFHUWLÀFDWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQRUTXDOLWVHDOV Yes 17
IV. Capacity building
Country response Global response (%)b§
ICT education
,7WUDLQLQJIRUVWXGHQWVLQKHDOWKVFLHQFHVDWWHUWLDULQVWLWXWLRQV Do not know 77
,QVWLWXWLRQVRIIHUFRQWLQXLQJHGXFDWLRQLQ,7IRUKHDOWKSURIHVVLRQDOV Do not know 75
Professional groups offered ICT continuing education
0HGLFDO — 73
Nursing — 62
3XEOLFKHDOWK — 60
Dentistry — 54
Pharmacy — 54
§,QGLFDWHVWKHSHUFHQWDJHRISDUWLFLSDWLQJ0HPEHU6WDWHVUHVSRQGLQJ´HVµ
III. eHealth expenditures and their funding source
Expenditure Public funding Private funding
Donor/non-public
funding
Public-private
partnerships funding
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
,7HTXLSPHQW Yes 78 — 37 Yes — 28
Software Yes 76 — 35 Yes 56 —
3LORWSURMHFWV Yes — 33 Yes 51 — 28
Skills training Yes 61 — 26 No 43 — 20
Ongoing support No 61 — No 35 — 18
Scholarships No 28 — 8 No — 4
111. I. Telemedicine
Country response Global response (%)c§
Telemedicine enabling actions
National telemedicine policy No 25
,PSOHPHQWHGQDWLRQDOWHOHPHGLFLQHSROLF — —
)RUPDOHYDOXDWLRQDQGRUSXEOLFDWLRQRIWHOHPHGLFLQHLQLWLDWLYHVVLQFH No 22
Barriers to implementing telemedicine solutions
Perceived costs too high Yes 60
Lack of legal policies/regulation Yes 40
Organizational culture not supportive No
Underdeveloped infrastructure No 38
Lack of policy frameworks No 37
RPSHWLQJSULRULWLHV No 37
/DFNRIGHPDQGEKHDOWKSURIHVVLRQDOV Yes 31
Lack of nationally adopted standards No 26
Lack of knowledge of applications Yes 25
Lack of technical expertise No 17
Information most needed in country to support telemedicine development
RVWDQGFRVWHIIHFWLYHQHVV No
OLQLFDOSRVVLELOLWLHV Yes 58
,QIUDVWUXFWXUH No 52
(YDOXDWLRQ Yes 46
Legal and ethical Yes 45
(IIHFWRQKXPDQUHVRXUFHV No 40
Patients' perception Yes 30
II. mHealth
Country response Global response (%)b§
mHealth initiatives
P+HDOWKLQLWLDWLYHVDUHFRQGXFWHGLQFRXQWU Yes 83
)RUPDOHYDOXDWLRQDQGRUSXEOLFDWLRQRIP+HDOWKLQLWLDWLYHV Do not know 12
Barriers to implementing mHealth initiatives
RPSHWLQJSULRULWLHV No 53
Lack of knowledge of applications Yes 47
Lack of policy framework Yes 44
RVWHIIHFWLYHQHVVXQNQRZQ Yes 40
Lack of legal policies/regulation No 38
Perceived costs too high Yes 37
Lack of demand No
Underdeveloped infrastructure No 26
Lack of technical expertise No 26
IIIa. eLearning
Country response Global response (%)c§
eLearning in health sciences at the tertiary level
Used in teaching health sciences Yes 72
Used in training health professionals Yes
Barriers to eLearning
Underdeveloped infrastructure Yes 64
Lack of policy framework No 63
Lack of skilled course developers Yes 55
Lack of knowledge of applications Yes 46
Perceived costs too high Yes 45
$YDLODELOLWRIVXLWDEOHFRXUVHV No 42
Lack of demand No 21
IIIb. eLearning target groups
Profession Students Professionals
Country response Global response (%)c§ Country response Global response (%)c§
0HGLFDO Yes 68 Yes 71
3XEOLFKHDOWK Yes 52 Yes 56
Nursing Yes 50 Yes 55
Pharmacy Yes 45 Yes 37
Dentistry No No 37
a n=113
E n=112
c n=114
WHO European Region
118. 80 Nurse density (per 10 000 population) 5.3 'LVDELOLW$GMXVWHG/LIHHDUV'$/
119. 10 750
Sources: See page ix
1. eHealth foundation actions
H+HDOWKIRXQGDWLRQDFWLRQVEXLOGDQHQDEOLQJHQYLURQPHQWIRUWKHXVHRI,7IRUKHDOWK7KHVHLQFOXGHVXSSRUWLYHH+HDOWK
policy, legal and ethical frameworks; adequate funding from various sources; infrastructure development; and developing the
capacity of the health work force through training.
I. Policy framework
Country response Global response (%)§ Policy implemented Year of implementation
National eGovernment policy Yes 85E Partly 2000
1DWLRQDOH+HDOWKSROLF Yes 55E Partly 2005
1DWLRQDO,7SURFXUHPHQWSROLFIRUKHDOWKVHFWRU Yes 37E Yes 2003
1DWLRQDOPXOWLFXOWXUDOLVPSROLFIRUH+HDOWK Yes 30E Yes Before 2000
National telemedicine policy No 25c — —
II. Legal and ethical frameworks for eHealth
Country response Global response (%)a§
Legislation on personal and health-related data
7RHQVXUHSULYDFRISHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWD Yes 70
7RSURWHFWSHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWDVSHFLÀFDOOLQ(05RU(+51 Yes 31
Legislation for sharing health-related data between health care staff through EMR/EHR1
Within the same health care facility and its network of care providers Yes 26
With different health care entities within the country Yes 23
With health care entities in other countries No 11
Internet pharmacies
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFRSHUDWLRQV Prohibits $OORZV3URKLELWV
1DWLRQDOUHJXODWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQFHUWLÀFDWLRQRI,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFVLWHV Yes 7
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFSXUFKDVHVIURPRWKHUFRXQWULHV Prohibits $OORZV3URKLELWV
Internet safety
*RYHUQPHQWVSRQVRUHGLQLWLDWLYHVDERXW,QWHUQHWVDIHWDQGOLWHUDF Yes 47
6HFXULWWRROVUHTXLUHGEODZIRUIDFLOLWLHVXVHGEFKLOGUHQ Yes 22
Quality assurance approaches to health-related Internet content
9ROXQWDUFRPSOLDQFHEFRQWHQWSURYLGHUVRUZHEVLWHRZQHUV Yes 56
7HFKQRORJWKURXJKÀOWHUVDQGFRQWUROV No 28
Government intervention through laws or regulations Yes 26
(GXFDWLRQSURJUDPPHVIRUFRQVXPHUVDQGSURIHVVLRQDOV No 23
2IÀFLDODSSURYDOWKURXJKFHUWLÀFDWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQRUTXDOLWVHDOV Yes 17
IV. Capacity building
Country response Global response (%)b§
ICT education
,7WUDLQLQJIRUVWXGHQWVLQKHDOWKVFLHQFHVDWWHUWLDULQVWLWXWLRQV Yes 77
,QVWLWXWLRQVRIIHUFRQWLQXLQJHGXFDWLRQLQ,7IRUKHDOWKSURIHVVLRQDOV Yes 75
Professional groups offered ICT continuing education
0HGLFDO Yes 73
Nursing No 62
3XEOLFKHDOWK Yes 60
Dentistry No 54
Pharmacy No 54
§,QGLFDWHVWKHSHUFHQWDJHRISDUWLFLSDWLQJ0HPEHU6WDWHVUHVSRQGLQJ´HVµ
III. eHealth expenditures and their funding source
Expenditure Public funding Private funding
Donor/non-public
funding
Public-private
partnerships funding
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
,7HTXLSPHQW Yes 78 Yes 37 — No 28
Software Yes 76 Yes 35 — 56 No
3LORWSURMHFWV Yes Yes 33 — 51 Yes 28
Skills training No 61 Yes 26 — 43 No 20
Ongoing support Yes 61 Yes — 35 No 18
Scholarships No 28 No 8 — No 4
123. I. Telemedicine
Country response Global response (%)c§
Telemedicine enabling actions
National telemedicine policy No 25
,PSOHPHQWHGQDWLRQDOWHOHPHGLFLQHSROLF — —
)RUPDOHYDOXDWLRQDQGRUSXEOLFDWLRQRIWHOHPHGLFLQHLQLWLDWLYHVVLQFH No 22
Barriers to implementing telemedicine solutions
Perceived costs too high Yes 60
Lack of legal policies/regulation No 40
Organizational culture not supportive Yes
Underdeveloped infrastructure No 38
Lack of policy frameworks No 37
RPSHWLQJSULRULWLHV No 37
/DFNRIGHPDQGEKHDOWKSURIHVVLRQDOV Yes 31
Lack of nationally adopted standards No 26
Lack of knowledge of applications No 25
Lack of technical expertise No 17
Information most needed in country to support telemedicine development
RVWDQGFRVWHIIHFWLYHQHVV Yes
OLQLFDOSRVVLELOLWLHV Yes 58
,QIUDVWUXFWXUH No 52
(YDOXDWLRQ No 46
Legal and ethical No 45
(IIHFWRQKXPDQUHVRXUFHV No 40
Patients' perception No 30
II. mHealth
Country response Global response (%)b§
mHealth initiatives
P+HDOWKLQLWLDWLYHVDUHFRQGXFWHGLQFRXQWU Yes 83
)RUPDOHYDOXDWLRQDQGRUSXEOLFDWLRQRIP+HDOWKLQLWLDWLYHV Yes 12
Barriers to implementing mHealth initiatives
RPSHWLQJSULRULWLHV No 53
Lack of knowledge of applications Yes 47
Lack of policy framework No 44
RVWHIIHFWLYHQHVVXQNQRZQ Yes 40
Lack of legal policies/regulation No 38
Perceived costs too high No 37
Lack of demand No
Underdeveloped infrastructure No 26
Lack of technical expertise Yes 26
IIIa. eLearning
Country response Global response (%)c§
eLearning in health sciences at the tertiary level
Used in teaching health sciences Yes 72
Used in training health professionals Yes
Barriers to eLearning
Underdeveloped infrastructure No 64
Lack of policy framework Yes 63
Lack of skilled course developers No 55
Lack of knowledge of applications Yes 46
Perceived costs too high No 45
$YDLODELOLWRIVXLWDEOHFRXUVHV No 42
Lack of demand Yes 21
IIIb. eLearning target groups
Profession Students Professionals
Country response Global response (%)c§ Country response Global response (%)c§
0HGLFDO Yes 68 Yes 71
3XEOLFKHDOWK Yes 52 No 56
Nursing No 50 No 55
Pharmacy No 45 No 37
Dentistry No No 37
a n=113
E n=112
c n=114
WHO European Region
130. 72 Nurse density (per 10 000 population) 12.6 'LVDELOLW$GMXVWHG/LIHHDUV'$/
131. 21 180
Sources: See page ix
1. eHealth foundation actions
H+HDOWKIRXQGDWLRQDFWLRQVEXLOGDQHQDEOLQJHQYLURQPHQWIRUWKHXVHRI,7IRUKHDOWK7KHVHLQFOXGHVXSSRUWLYHH+HDOWK
policy, legal and ethical frameworks; adequate funding from various sources; infrastructure development; and developing the
capacity of the health work force through training.
I. Policy framework
Country response Global response (%)§ Policy implemented Year of implementation
National eGovernment policy Yes 85E Partly 2007
1DWLRQDOH+HDOWKSROLF Yes 55E No —
1DWLRQDO,7SURFXUHPHQWSROLFIRUKHDOWKVHFWRU No 37E — —
1DWLRQDOPXOWLFXOWXUDOLVPSROLFIRUH+HDOWK No 30E — —
National telemedicine policy No 25c — —
II. Legal and ethical frameworks for eHealth
Country response Global response (%)a§
Legislation on personal and health-related data
7RHQVXUHSULYDFRISHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWD No 70
7RSURWHFWSHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWDVSHFLÀFDOOLQ(05RU(+51 No 31
Legislation for sharing health-related data between health care staff through EMR/EHR1
Within the same health care facility and its network of care providers Do not know 26
With different health care entities within the country Do not know 23
With health care entities in other countries Do not know 11
Internet pharmacies
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFRSHUDWLRQV No $OORZV3URKLELWV
1DWLRQDOUHJXODWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQFHUWLÀFDWLRQRI,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFVLWHV No 7
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFSXUFKDVHVIURPRWKHUFRXQWULHV No $OORZV3URKLELWV
Internet safety
*RYHUQPHQWVSRQVRUHGLQLWLDWLYHVDERXW,QWHUQHWVDIHWDQGOLWHUDF No 47
6HFXULWWRROVUHTXLUHGEODZIRUIDFLOLWLHVXVHGEFKLOGUHQ No 22
Quality assurance approaches to health-related Internet content
9ROXQWDUFRPSOLDQFHEFRQWHQWSURYLGHUVRUZHEVLWHRZQHUV No data 56
7HFKQRORJWKURXJKÀOWHUVDQGFRQWUROV No data 28
Government intervention through laws or regulations No data 26
(GXFDWLRQSURJUDPPHVIRUFRQVXPHUVDQGSURIHVVLRQDOV No data 23
2IÀFLDODSSURYDOWKURXJKFHUWLÀFDWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQRUTXDOLWVHDOV No data 17
IV. Capacity building
Country response Global response (%)b§
ICT education
,7WUDLQLQJIRUVWXGHQWVLQKHDOWKVFLHQFHVDWWHUWLDULQVWLWXWLRQV No 77
,QVWLWXWLRQVRIIHUFRQWLQXLQJHGXFDWLRQLQ,7IRUKHDOWKSURIHVVLRQDOV Yes 75
Professional groups offered ICT continuing education
0HGLFDO Yes 73
Nursing Yes 62
3XEOLFKHDOWK Yes 60
Dentistry Yes 54
Pharmacy Yes 54
§,QGLFDWHVWKHSHUFHQWDJHRISDUWLFLSDWLQJ0HPEHU6WDWHVUHVSRQGLQJ´HVµ
III. eHealth expenditures and their funding source
Expenditure Public funding Private funding
Donor/non-public
funding
Public-private
partnerships funding
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
,7HTXLSPHQW Yes 78 Yes 37 Yes No 28
Software Yes 76 Yes 35 Yes 56 Yes
3LORWSURMHFWV Yes No 33 Yes 51 No 28
Skills training Yes 61 Yes 26 Yes 43 No 20
Ongoing support Yes 61 Yes Yes 35 Yes 18
Scholarships Yes 28 Yes 8 Yes No 4
135. I. Telemedicine
Country response Global response (%)c§
Telemedicine enabling actions
National telemedicine policy No 25
,PSOHPHQWHGQDWLRQDOWHOHPHGLFLQHSROLF — —
)RUPDOHYDOXDWLRQDQGRUSXEOLFDWLRQRIWHOHPHGLFLQHLQLWLDWLYHVVLQFH No 22
Barriers to implementing telemedicine solutions
Perceived costs too high Yes 60
Lack of legal policies/regulation Yes 40
Organizational culture not supportive No
Underdeveloped infrastructure Yes 38
Lack of policy frameworks No 37
RPSHWLQJSULRULWLHV Yes 37
/DFNRIGHPDQGEKHDOWKSURIHVVLRQDOV No 31
Lack of nationally adopted standards No 26
Lack of knowledge of applications No 25
Lack of technical expertise No 17
Information most needed in country to support telemedicine development
RVWDQGFRVWHIIHFWLYHQHVV No
OLQLFDOSRVVLELOLWLHV Yes 58
,QIUDVWUXFWXUH No 52
(YDOXDWLRQ Yes 46
Legal and ethical Yes 45
(IIHFWRQKXPDQUHVRXUFHV Yes 40
Patients' perception No 30
II. mHealth
Country response Global response (%)b§
mHealth initiatives
P+HDOWKLQLWLDWLYHVDUHFRQGXFWHGLQFRXQWU Yes 83
)RUPDOHYDOXDWLRQDQGRUSXEOLFDWLRQRIP+HDOWKLQLWLDWLYHV No 12
Barriers to implementing mHealth initiatives
RPSHWLQJSULRULWLHV Yes 53
Lack of knowledge of applications No 47
Lack of policy framework No 44
RVWHIIHFWLYHQHVVXQNQRZQ No 40
Lack of legal policies/regulation Yes 38
Perceived costs too high Yes 37
Lack of demand No
Underdeveloped infrastructure Yes 26
Lack of technical expertise No 26
IIIa. eLearning
Country response Global response (%)c§
eLearning in health sciences at the tertiary level
Used in teaching health sciences No 72
Used in training health professionals Yes
Barriers to eLearning
Underdeveloped infrastructure Yes 64
Lack of policy framework Yes 63
Lack of skilled course developers Yes 55
Lack of knowledge of applications No 46
Perceived costs too high No 45
$YDLODELOLWRIVXLWDEOHFRXUVHV No 42
Lack of demand Yes 21
IIIb. eLearning target groups
Profession Students Professionals
Country response Global response (%)c§ Country response Global response (%)c§
0HGLFDO — 68 Yes 71
3XEOLFKHDOWK — 52 Yes 56
Nursing — 50 Yes 55
Pharmacy — 45 No 37
Dentistry — No 37
a n=113
E n=112
c n=114
WHO Region of the Americas
142. 57 Nurse density (per 10 000 population) 7.7 'LVDELOLW$GMXVWHG/LIHHDUV'$/
143. 37 601
Sources: See page ix
1. eHealth foundation actions
H+HDOWKIRXQGDWLRQDFWLRQVEXLOGDQHQDEOLQJHQYLURQPHQWIRUWKHXVHRI,7IRUKHDOWK7KHVHLQFOXGHVXSSRUWLYHH+HDOWK
policy, legal and ethical frameworks; adequate funding from various sources; infrastructure development; and developing the
capacity of the health work force through training.
I. Policy framework
Country response Global response (%)§ Policy implemented Year of implementation
National eGovernment policy Yes 85E Partly 2003
1DWLRQDOH+HDOWKSROLF No 55E — —
1DWLRQDO,7SURFXUHPHQWSROLFIRUKHDOWKVHFWRU Yes 37E Partly 2000
1DWLRQDOPXOWLFXOWXUDOLVPSROLFIRUH+HDOWK No 30E — —
National telemedicine policy No 25c — —
II. Legal and ethical frameworks for eHealth
Country response Global response (%)a§
Legislation on personal and health-related data
7RHQVXUHSULYDFRISHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWD No 70
7RSURWHFWSHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWDVSHFLÀFDOOLQ(05RU(+51 No 31
Legislation for sharing health-related data between health care staff through EMR/EHR1
Within the same health care facility and its network of care providers No 26
With different health care entities within the country No 23
With health care entities in other countries No 11
Internet pharmacies
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFRSHUDWLRQV No $OORZV3URKLELWV
1DWLRQDOUHJXODWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQFHUWLÀFDWLRQRI,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFVLWHV No 7
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFSXUFKDVHVIURPRWKHUFRXQWULHV No $OORZV3URKLELWV
Internet safety
*RYHUQPHQWVSRQVRUHGLQLWLDWLYHVDERXW,QWHUQHWVDIHWDQGOLWHUDF No 47
6HFXULWWRROVUHTXLUHGEODZIRUIDFLOLWLHVXVHGEFKLOGUHQ No 22
Quality assurance approaches to health-related Internet content
9ROXQWDUFRPSOLDQFHEFRQWHQWSURYLGHUVRUZHEVLWHRZQHUV No data 56
7HFKQRORJWKURXJKÀOWHUVDQGFRQWUROV No data 28
Government intervention through laws or regulations No data 26
(GXFDWLRQSURJUDPPHVIRUFRQVXPHUVDQGSURIHVVLRQDOV No data 23
2IÀFLDODSSURYDOWKURXJKFHUWLÀFDWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQRUTXDOLWVHDOV No data 17
IV. Capacity building
Country response Global response (%)b§
ICT education
,7WUDLQLQJIRUVWXGHQWVLQKHDOWKVFLHQFHVDWWHUWLDULQVWLWXWLRQV Yes 77
,QVWLWXWLRQVRIIHUFRQWLQXLQJHGXFDWLRQLQ,7IRUKHDOWKSURIHVVLRQDOV Yes 75
Professional groups offered ICT continuing education
0HGLFDO Yes 73
Nursing No 62
3XEOLFKHDOWK Yes 60
Dentistry No 54
Pharmacy No 54
§,QGLFDWHVWKHSHUFHQWDJHRISDUWLFLSDWLQJ0HPEHU6WDWHVUHVSRQGLQJ´HVµ
III. eHealth expenditures and their funding source
Expenditure Public funding Private funding
Donor/non-public
funding
Public-private
partnerships funding
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
,7HTXLSPHQW Yes 78 Yes 37 Yes Yes 28
Software Yes 76 Yes 35 Yes 56 Yes
3LORWSURMHFWV No No 33 No 51 No 28
Skills training No 61 No 26 Yes 43 No 20
Ongoing support No 61 No No 35 No 18
Scholarships No 28 No 8 No No 4
147. I. Telemedicine
Country response Global response (%)c§
Telemedicine enabling actions
National telemedicine policy No 25
,PSOHPHQWHGQDWLRQDOWHOHPHGLFLQHSROLF — —
)RUPDOHYDOXDWLRQDQGRUSXEOLFDWLRQRIWHOHPHGLFLQHLQLWLDWLYHVVLQFH No 22
Barriers to implementing telemedicine solutions
Perceived costs too high No 60
Lack of legal policies/regulation No 40
Organizational culture not supportive Yes
Underdeveloped infrastructure Yes 38
Lack of policy frameworks No 37
RPSHWLQJSULRULWLHV No 37
/DFNRIGHPDQGEKHDOWKSURIHVVLRQDOV No 31
Lack of nationally adopted standards No 26
Lack of knowledge of applications Yes 25
Lack of technical expertise Yes 17
Information most needed in country to support telemedicine development
RVWDQGFRVWHIIHFWLYHQHVV No
OLQLFDOSRVVLELOLWLHV Yes 58
,QIUDVWUXFWXUH No 52
(YDOXDWLRQ Yes 46
Legal and ethical No 45
(IIHFWRQKXPDQUHVRXUFHV Yes 40
Patients' perception Yes 30
II. mHealth
Country response Global response (%)b§
mHealth initiatives
P+HDOWKLQLWLDWLYHVDUHFRQGXFWHGLQFRXQWU Yes 83
)RUPDOHYDOXDWLRQDQGRUSXEOLFDWLRQRIP+HDOWKLQLWLDWLYHV Yes 12
Barriers to implementing mHealth initiatives
RPSHWLQJSULRULWLHV No 53
Lack of knowledge of applications No 47
Lack of policy framework No 44
RVWHIIHFWLYHQHVVXQNQRZQ No 40
Lack of legal policies/regulation No 38
Perceived costs too high Yes 37
Lack of demand Yes
Underdeveloped infrastructure Yes 26
Lack of technical expertise Yes 26
IIIa. eLearning
Country response Global response (%)c§
eLearning in health sciences at the tertiary level
Used in teaching health sciences No 72
Used in training health professionals No
Barriers to eLearning
Underdeveloped infrastructure No 64
Lack of policy framework Yes 63
Lack of skilled course developers Yes 55
Lack of knowledge of applications Yes 46
Perceived costs too high No 45
$YDLODELOLWRIVXLWDEOHFRXUVHV Yes 42
Lack of demand No 21
IIIb. eLearning target groups
Profession Students Professionals
Country response Global response (%)c§ Country response Global response (%)c§
0HGLFDO — 68 — 71
3XEOLFKHDOWK — 52 — 56
Nursing — 50 — 55
Pharmacy — 45 — 37
Dentistry — — 37
a n=113
E n=112
c n=114
WHO African Region
154. 63 Nurse density (per 10 000 population) 2.4 'LVDELOLW$GMXVWHG/LIHHDUV'$/
155. 25 734
Sources: See page ix
1. eHealth foundation actions
H+HDOWKIRXQGDWLRQDFWLRQVEXLOGDQHQDEOLQJHQYLURQPHQWIRUWKHXVHRI,7IRUKHDOWK7KHVHLQFOXGHVXSSRUWLYHH+HDOWK
policy, legal and ethical frameworks; adequate funding from various sources; infrastructure development; and developing the
capacity of the health work force through training.
I. Policy framework
Country response Global response (%)§ Policy implemented Year of implementation
National eGovernment policy Yes 85E Partly 2004
1DWLRQDOH+HDOWKSROLF No 55E — —
1DWLRQDO,7SURFXUHPHQWSROLFIRUKHDOWKVHFWRU No 37E — —
1DWLRQDOPXOWLFXOWXUDOLVPSROLFIRUH+HDOWK No 30E — —
National telemedicine policy No 25c — —
II. Legal and ethical frameworks for eHealth
Country response Global response (%)a§
Legislation on personal and health-related data
7RHQVXUHSULYDFRISHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWD No 70
7RSURWHFWSHUVRQDOOLGHQWLÀDEOHGDWDVSHFLÀFDOOLQ(05RU(+51 No 31
Legislation for sharing health-related data between health care staff through EMR/EHR1
Within the same health care facility and its network of care providers No 26
With different health care entities within the country No 23
With health care entities in other countries No 11
Internet pharmacies
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFRSHUDWLRQV No $OORZV3URKLELWV
1DWLRQDOUHJXODWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQFHUWLÀFDWLRQRI,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFVLWHV No 7
/HJLVODWLRQWKDWDOORZVSURKLELWV,QWHUQHWSKDUPDFSXUFKDVHVIURPRWKHUFRXQWULHV No $OORZV3URKLELWV
Internet safety
*RYHUQPHQWVSRQVRUHGLQLWLDWLYHVDERXW,QWHUQHWVDIHWDQGOLWHUDF Yes 47
6HFXULWWRROVUHTXLUHGEODZIRUIDFLOLWLHVXVHGEFKLOGUHQ No 22
Quality assurance approaches to health-related Internet content
9ROXQWDUFRPSOLDQFHEFRQWHQWSURYLGHUVRUZHEVLWHRZQHUV Yes 56
7HFKQRORJWKURXJKÀOWHUVDQGFRQWUROV No 28
Government intervention through laws or regulations No 26
(GXFDWLRQSURJUDPPHVIRUFRQVXPHUVDQGSURIHVVLRQDOV No 23
2IÀFLDODSSURYDOWKURXJKFHUWLÀFDWLRQDFFUHGLWDWLRQRUTXDOLWVHDOV No 17
IV. Capacity building
Country response Global response (%)b§
ICT education
,7WUDLQLQJIRUVWXGHQWVLQKHDOWKVFLHQFHVDWWHUWLDULQVWLWXWLRQV Yes 77
,QVWLWXWLRQVRIIHUFRQWLQXLQJHGXFDWLRQLQ,7IRUKHDOWKSURIHVVLRQDOV Yes 75
Professional groups offered ICT continuing education
0HGLFDO Yes 73
Nursing Yes 62
3XEOLFKHDOWK Yes 60
Dentistry Yes 54
Pharmacy Yes 54
§,QGLFDWHVWKHSHUFHQWDJHRISDUWLFLSDWLQJ0HPEHU6WDWHVUHVSRQGLQJ´HVµ
III. eHealth expenditures and their funding source
Expenditure Public funding Private funding
Donor/non-public
funding
Public-private
partnerships funding
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
RXQWU
response
*OREDO
response (%)E†
,7HTXLSPHQW Yes 78 — 37 Yes — 28
Software Yes 76 — 35 Yes 56 —
3LORWSURMHFWV Yes — 33 Yes 51 — 28
Skills training Yes 61 — 26 Yes 43 — 20
Ongoing support Yes 61 — No 35 — 18
Scholarships Yes 28 — 8 Yes — 4