SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Assignment Instructions.
GETTING STARTED: The next assignments will focus on an
established non-profit organization called Engineers Without
Borders. This organization’s website can be found here:
http://www.ewb-usa.org/. This information will be necessary to
complete this Projects.
SCENARIO: You are still working with the brochures that you
produced in the previous assignment. You must take them to a
printer. In the past, the printing company, Gonzales and Sons,
Inc., 8852 Westheimer, Houston, TX, has printed brochures for
you in the past and has produced excellent work. Because EWB
is a not-for-profit organization, this printing company has for
the past seven years offered to print to 1,000 brochures at a 50%
reduction of normal costs as a “donation” to EWB. However,
this has been a bad economic year for Gonzales and Sons, and
they feel they cannot offer you the 50% discount anymore. The
printing company needs to write a bad news letter to EWB
telling them the organization telling them.
YOUR TASK:
· As the accounts manager of Gonzales and Sons, write a “bad
news” letter to EWB in correct business letter format. For
specific information on this, review the guidelines about letters,
specifically the areas about bad news and adjustments/refusals.
(You can find the guidelines below this assignment instructions)
· Tell them what you can do, though, to salvage a good
business relationship.
· Sign your name. The person signing is the accounts manager.
· Define the purpose of the letter by deciding what you want
the reader to do when he or she has finished reading the letter.
Write an appropriate action statement for use in the letter.
Because your request falls in the category of bad news,
organize the letter using an indirect pattern. A good way to
remember this is the “sandwich” method: start with good news,
then the bad news, then end with good news.
· Provide logical reasoning, explanations, and details when
needed.
· Cushion the bad news, perhaps suggesting a compromise.
· Present material with concision, clarity, and fluency.
· Tell your readers which enclosures you would send with this
letter.
· Determine if anybody else would need a copy of the letter and
make necessary notations if so.
FORMATTING: If you need to review the requirements for
standard business-like letters, refer to the “Bad News” and
“Adjustments / Refusals.” guidelines below.
GUIDELINES for Conveying Bad News*
· Don’t Procrastinate. As much as people may dislike the news,
they will feel doubly offended after being kept in the day.
Never just blurt it out. Set a considerate tone by prefacing your
bad news with considerate terms such as I regret, We’re sorry,
or Unfortunately. Instead of flatly proclaiming Your application
has been denied, give recipients information they can use:
Unfortunately, we are unable to offer you admission to this
year’s program. This letter will explain why we made this
decision and how you can reapply. Provide a context that leads
into your explanation.
· Give a clear and honest explanation. Don’t make things worse
by fogging or dodging the issue.
· When you need to apologize, do so immediately. Place your
apology right up front. Don’t say
An error was made in calculating your construction bill. Do say
we are sorry we made a mistake in calculating your construction
bill. Don’t attempt to camouflage the error. Don’t offer excuses
or try to shift the blame.
· Use the passive voice to avoid accusations but not to dodge
responsibility.
Instead of You used the wrong bolts, say The wrong bolts were
used.
· Do not use “you” to blame the reader. Instead of You did not
send a deposit, say We have not received your deposit.
GUIDELINE for Adjustment Letters
Granting Adjustment
· Begin with the good news. A sincere apology helps rebuild
customers’ confidence.
· Explain what went wrong and how the problem will be
corrected. Without an honest explanation you leave the
impression that such problems are common or beyond your
control.
· Name blame employees as scapegoats. To blame someone in
the firm reflects poorly on the firm itself.
· Do not promise that the problem never will recur. Mishaps are
inevitable.
· End on a positive note. Focus on the solution, not the problem.
Refusing Adjustment
· Use an indirect organizational plan. Explain diplomatically
and clearly why you are refusing the request. Your goal is to
convince the reader that your refusal results from a thorough
analysis of the situation.
· Be sure the refusal is unambiguous. Don’t create unrealistic
expectations by using evasive language.
· Avoid a patronizing or accusing tone. Use the passive voice so
as not to accuse the claimant, but do not hide behind the passive
voice.
· Close courteously and positively. Offer an alternative or
compromise, when it is feasible to do so.
Laboratory Experiment. Number 6 & 7
Heat Treatment and Hardenability of Steels
Submitted to fulfill the requirements of MSE 227/L T 7-9:50
California State University, Northridge
College of Engineering and Computer Science
Manufacturing Systems Engineering and Management
Coach: Tony Magee
April 2, 2013
Team No.4
Naif Alabdullatef
Abdulaziz Aljamaan
Naif Alolaiwi
Daniel Curry
Prepared By:
Naif Alabdullatef
Laboratory Experiment No. 6 & 7
Heat Treatment and Hardenability of Steels
Abstract
This experiment is attempted to measure the hardenability of the
steel and understand the process of heat treatment of different
materials at different cooling strategies. Cooling through
different procedures will cause the materials to have different
properties and different microstructures. Furthermore next stage
of experiment relates the cooling rate and hardness of 1045
steel and 4143 steel. This also helps in determine how alloying
a material permits it to be heat treated more homogeneously.
Investigated results also proven to be close enough to expected
results in obtaining higher brittleness with rapid cooling in and
to improve ductility the process of tempering is proven to be
very efficient with increase of tempering temperature the
hardness of material must be decrease. Last but not least, after
finishing experiment 6 the group found out that the lower the
tempering temperature the lower the hardness. Also, the results
that the group found from experiment 7 after finishing it proved
being inconsistent from what it should be.
Introduction
The purpose of this experiment is to determine what effect heat
treating and then cooling has on the hardness and grain
structure of two different types of steel. The two different types
of steels were utilized are 1045 steel samples and 4143 steel
sample which is considered to be a low-alloy steel.
The heat-treating process is a method to alter physical and
mechanical properties of the material. The heat-treating process
is consists of three crucial steps of annealing, hardening, and
tempering. Annealing is primarily used to soften and to induce
the ductility of the specimens by heating and holding at suitable
temperature and then cooling, by instantly quenching in the
water, which produces the higher brittleness with low ductility
and toughness in the specimens. Moreover, tempering is a
process of heat-treating, which is used to increase the toughness
of metal. Tempering is important because it used to achieve
desired hardness. To restore some the toughness and impact
properties is obtained by tempering where specimens are
reheated to a temperature between 5000 F and 10000 F for
certain time which removes the internal strain caused by sudden
cooling in the quenching bath without a large decrease in
hardness or strength.
In attempting the first phase of the experiment it cannot
determined why some heat-treated materials don’t reach a high
hardness when cooled at certain temperature. With the hardness
test the hardness of a material can be determined. The
Hardenability is a property that determines the depth and
distribution of hardness when steel is heated to a given
temperature and then quenched to reach martensitic structure,
which is obtained by performing Jominy test, where an
austenitized steel bar is quenched at one end only, thus
producing a range of cooling rates along the bar.
Procedure
First of all, the experiment provided six 1045 steel specimens
were for heat treating process, and for the second were only two
steel rods of 1045 steel and 4143 steel respectively used to
perform the Jominy test. In order to go though the details read
the following: First the group begin with identifying all each
specimen by punching different letter on to them using hammer.
Second, the engineer students heated all specimens at 16000 F
for 1/2 hour after obtaining the Rockwell a scale hardness
measurement. Third, The four samples were quenched in water,
one sample is allowed for air cool, and the other sample is set
for furnace cool for one hour and quenched in water. Then, the
two steel rods of different properties also allowed for heated at
16000 F for 45 minutes after obtaining the Rockwell scale
hardness measurements. Also, the group measured the Rockwell
a scale hardness on all six quenched specimens after being heat
treated and tempered the three-quenched specimen at different
temperature of 6000 F, 8000 F, and 10000 F respectively for 30
minutes. After tempering specimens then quenched in water.
Moreover, obtained hardness measurements using Brinell (3000
kg) and Rockwell A scale on all six steel specimens. In order to
perform the Jominy test one steel rod is then removed from the
furnace and is placed in the cooling tower for 10 minutes before
quenching in water, repeated the same procedure for other steel
rod. Finally, measured the hardness 1/16 inch for the first inch
and every 1/8 for the next inch and 1/4 for the next 2 inches
using Rockwell a scale for both steel rods.
Results and Discussions
The experiments “Heat Treatment of Steel” and “Hardenability
of Steel” are two different experiments, which show the effects
of heat-treating, and quenching of specimen provides different
hardness and microstructure in the materials. During first phase
of experiment the two specimens are left to cool at room
temperature and furnace temperature, these specimens were
quenched after an hour. The reason for this quenching after an
hour is due to the fact that the grains in the material are given a
chance to form when cooling at room temperature and furnace
cooling temperature. If the grains are not given enough time to
form when cooling at room and oven temperature the grain
structure would not be accurate as if actually air cooled and
furnace cooled. From the Table 1 it can be clearly seen the
hardness obtained through furnace cooled is lesser than
hardness obtained by air cooled specimens because in furnace
cooling allow the grains to from due to its slow cooling process
where as during air cool specimens tends to cool much quicker
compare to furnace cool and specimens have less time to form
grains. Due to that specimens will have more boundaries, which
mean there will be more interference with dislocation motion.
Also, in Table 1 it shows the Rockwell measurement is 76.99
for the instant quench. On the other hand, the furnace cooled is
55.05. Moreover, in Table 2 represent the Ultimate Tensile
strength (psi) for all samples from the average Brinell Hardness
number obtained. In fact, the hardness of both of the measured
BNH and the measured Rockwell are decreasing. The Ultimate
Tensile Strength (psi) is also decreasing because the hardness is
going down. As we know the harder a material is the higher the
strength is. Furthermore, the instant quenched sample has the
highest hardness and the Ultimate Tensile strength results.
Finally, Table 3 represents the hardness of the Steel 1045
sample after it has been placed at different tempering
temperatures. Moreover, Table 4 shows the difference in
hardness between Steel 1045 and Steel 4143 that that was taken
at different distance from the quenched end.
Table 1 Comparison between performed Brinell hardness
numbers measurements with Brinell hardness numbers obtained
by conversion of Rockwell A scale measurements.
Specimens
Rockwell
A scale
measurements
RHA Conversion to BHN
Dimple Diameters (mm)
BHN from Dimple Diameters
S instant quench
76.99
500
2.50
601
H Tempered @540 0C
71.58
390
3.20
363
D Tempered @ 430 0C
69.19
353
2.90
444
K Tempered @ 315 0C
70.89
381
2.81
417
M (air cooled)
53.39
172
4.29
197
E (Furnace cooled)
53.05
169
4.51
179
Table 2 Computed Ultimate Tensile strength (psi) based on the
average Brinell Hardness number obtained.
Specimens
Measured BHN
(3000)kg
Measured Rockwell A scale numbers (HRA )
Conversion BHN
Average BHN
Ultimate Tensile Strength (psi)
S
401
75.53
500
550.5
2.75E+05
D
429
71.71
353
398.5
1.99E+05
K
444
66.89
381
399
2.00E+05
H
388
66.99
390
376.5
1.88E+05
M
211
55.92
172
184.5
9.23E+04
E
363
52.10
169
174
8.70E+04
The obtained Brinell hardness comparing to Brinell hardness
obtained from the conversion scale of Rockwell A scale
hardness both results increase and decrease accordingly to the
hardness. The data represented in Table 1 and Figure 1 shows
that Brinell hardness increase in relation to the cooling rate and
heat treating hardness for Rockwell A scale hardness
measurements, but did not increase between specimens “K” and
“D” instead hardness went down. If both the Brinell hardness
and Rockwell a numbers were proportional to each other a
straight line would be seen. A graph like the one shown in
Figure 1 could be a result of an inaccurate machine or
inaccurate measurement taking strategies.
Figure 1 Brinell Hardness numbers vs. Rockwell A scale
numbers obtained after heat treating of the specimens.
Table 3 The hardness measurements obtained using Rockwell A
scale for three 1045 steel specimens that has been tempered at
different temperatures after being heat treated.
Specimens
Hardness Rockwell
A scale (HRA)
Tempering temperature ( c )
D
71.71
430
K
66.89
315
H
66.99
540
Figure 2 Hardness obtained using Rockwell A scale hardness
after tempering the specimens.
To obtain desired mechanical properties in steel specimens it is
necessary to process heat treating, quenching, and tempering of
the steel. Hardening is way of making steel harder, by first heat
treating the specimens to 8850 C for half hour and immediately
cools it by quenching the specimens in water, which increase
the brittleness of the substance at much higher rate with very
low ductility and toughness in the samples. The tempering is the
process through which brittleness is reduced to improve
ductility and toughness by heating the specimens at different
temperature for certain time.
Higher tempering temperature will yield a somewhat softer
material with higher toughness, whereas a lower tempering
temperature will produce a harder and somewhat more brittle
material, as shown by the Figure 2 where hardness increases
with the increase of tempering temperature.
The possible errors of not quenching the specimens in desired
time or factors of obtaining the hardness of the samples at
softer spot may have occurred in processing the tempering of
specimens, which resulted on the graphs for not obtaining
consistency.
The decline in hardness of tempered specimens once has been
heat treated and quenched in Table 3 proves the hypothesis of
decrease in brittleness by tempering the specimens.
The Ultimate tensile strength of materials is determined using
equation 1 by using data collected for Brinell hardness for all
the specimens mentioned in Table 2.
Equation 1 Calculating the Ultimate Tensile Strength of
materials.
In determining the strength, obtaining the hardness is great
ways of making comparison, which can be attain using
Rockwell A scale and Brinell hardness scale which is directly
proportional to the tensile strength. In using Brinell hardness
scale timing in maintaining the load on the specimens may have
been a factor of slight variation of results where as in Rockwell
A scale ha
From the Figure 4 the amount of carbide ((Fe3C) can be
calculated at temperature 1338 0F for 1045 steel using equation
2 where C1 is 45% because that is the weight percent of carbon
in 1045 steel. Ca and Cb calculated using the lever rule which
consists of drawing a line across to determine how much weight
percent of material there is in the steel, where “a” is alpha and
“b” is Iron Carbide (Fe3C). Using equation 2 is determined that
Iron carbide percent is about 0.68% and 99.32% is presumed to
be alpha phase.
Wb = (C1 – Ca)/(Cb – Ca) , Ca= 2.2%, and Cb= 65% are the
weight percent composition.
Equation 2 To find the Fe3C (carbide) content using weight
percent equation.
Figure 4 The iron-iron carbide phase diagram.
Different microstructures obtained when specimens processed
through differen cooling strategies that is why the TTT (Time,
Temperature, Transformation) chart in Figure 5 is proven to be
great tool in determining the microstructure. The TTT chart
shows the amount of time needed to quench a material to reach
a certain phase. The left part line represents the beginning of
the transformation and the right part line represents the
conclusion of the transformation. The TTT chart also explains
the need of quenching the specimens after an hour of cooling
due to after certain time the specimens does not require any
more transformation. The martensite structure which is one of
the hardest of all phases is obtained upon quenching instantly to
a low temperature. But the other samples that quenched were
temperd again to move higher up in the TTT chart where less
hardened materials are . To obtained a desired phase it is
neccsary to for rapid change in temperature with respect to time
when quenching the 1045 steel to reach a Bainite phase.
The specimens that were furnace cooled and cooled at room
temperature are most likely to fall in the pearlite phase where
the one cooled at room temperature is said to be fine pearlite
while the other one is more close to coarse pearlite due to slow
cooling process. The specimens tempered at 540°C falls
between pearlite and bainite phases. The specimens tempered at
430°C and 315°C fall under the Bainite phase, the one tempered
at a lower temperature could be classified as being of finer
Bainite.
Figure 5 The TTT (Time, Temperature, Transformation) chart
for 1045 steel.
Microstructure and hardness are closely correlated;
microstructure consists of grain size and crystal structure. When
the specimens were reached at austenite phase, the grains are
more uniform and homogeneously distributed; upon completion
of this process the specimens are ready to be cooled in order to
obtain different hardeneability in the material. During instant
quenching of the specimens the specimens with evenly
distributed grains are not given a chance to form and are then
solidified giving the material a fine grain structure in contrast
to a material slowly cooling which gives a material more coarse
grains making the material less hard and more ductile. The
Jominy test results illustrated in Figure 3 prove that how
cooling rate affects hardness data obtained on the attempt of
experiment. The greater distance of quenching the less hard the
material is because, as mentioned before, the grains are given
more time to form, and the bigger the grains the less hard the
material. The inconsistency among results obtained instead of
constantly moving downward may have caused due to
experimental errors such as not placing it fast enough on the
Jominy tester. The graph line obtained by the 4143steel and
1045 steel quickly goes up and down not opening the water
enough for quenching during the Jominy test. The overall graph
is also does not matches to the expected results where 1045
steel graph must lower than the graph line obtained by the 4061
steel rod specimen is considered to be an experimental error of
not transporting the specimen on the tester with in time
duration.
Table 4 The Jominy test results obtained on two steel rods.
Distance from quenched end (in)
1045 Steel
4143 Steel
0.0625
75.9
66.2
0.125
72.2
66.4
0.1875
61.7
66.5
0.25
50.3
68.5
0.3125
58.2
67.6
0.375
56.9
61.3
0.4375
55.6
65.1
0.5
55.9
60.8
0.5625
53.6
60.6
0.625
55.7
61.4
0.6875
54.4
57.8
0.75
49.7
58.2
0.8125
51.8
53.8
0.875
51.2
55.9
0.9375
51.6
51.9
1
50.2
56.6
1.125
49.2
52.3
1.25
50.8
55
1.375
50.5
53.5
1.5
48.4
51.8
1.625
49.2
49.8
1.75
49.1
51.9
1.875
47.8
52
2
47.2
47.7
2.25
47.3
49.7
2.5
47.5
49.7
2.75
46.9
45.5
3
44.2
45.8
3.25
38.6
45.1
3.5
40.1
22.9
3.75
42.7
32
4
36.4
26.3
Figure 3 Plot showing Hardness as a function of distance from
the quenched end for 1045 steel and 4061 steel specimens. The
dash line is the Steel 4061 and the solid line is the Steel 1045.
Conclusion
Materials that cool at slower cooling rates tend to be softer
materials while those that are cooled at faster cooling rates tend
to be harder. Tempering a material lowers its ultimate strength
but increases the amount of stress the material can absorb
(toughness), higher the tempering temperature the lower the
ultimate strength. Tempering also adds more ductile
characteristics to the material. High hardness in materials only
can be attain when there is a low toughness, in order to acquire
toughness in a material that has been quenched, The tempering
of the specimens is then processed to improve the toughness in
the material and lower the brittleness.Fine grain structures tend
to be hard material where as materials with coarse grain
structure has more ductile properties. Furthermore, the data
does not accurately show what should be happening. The data I
collected has error that is obviously shows in my graph. The
graph should show a straight line going down similar to the one
in experiment 6. For example, after heating the Steel and
quenched it the group had to measured it and probably by
mistake the engineer student measured the same point twice or
took similar points close to each other. Also, maybe the time it
took to move the Steel from furnace to be quenched was too
long which effected the measurements. Moreover, the water that
was used to quench could have been too strong hitting the
specimen, which leads to make a huge differences in
measurements.
References
D. Callister Jr, Fundamentals of Materials Science and
Engineering, J. Wiley & Sons, NY, 3rd Ed. 2008, Flinn and
Trojan, Engineering Materials and Their Application, Chapter 6
Dieter, Mechanical Metallurgy ASM Handbook on Heat
Treatment, Vol. 2
http://www.smt.sandvik.com/en/products/strip-steel-and-strip-
based-products/strip-products/knife-steel/hardening-
guide/purpose-of-hardening-and-tempering/
http://www.carbidedepot.com/formulas-hardness.htm
William D. Callister, Jr., David G. Rethwisch. Fundamentals of
materials science and engineering, third edition
www.csun.edu/~bavarian/Courses/MSE%20227/Labs/2-
Charpy_test.pdf
Distance From Quenching (in) vs. Hardness (HRA)
1045 Steel 0.0625 0.125 0.1875 0.25 0.3125
0.375 0.4375 0.5 0.5625 0.625 0.6875
0.75 0.8125 0.875 0.9375 1.0 1.125 1.25
1.375 1.5 1.625 1.75 1.875 2.0 2.25 2.5
2.75 3.0 3.25 3.5 3.75 4.0 75.9 72.2 61.7 50.3 58.2
56.9 55.6 55.9 53.6 55.7 54.4 49.7 51.8 51.2 51.6 50.2
49.2 50.8 50.5 48.4 49.2 49.1 47.8 47.2 47.3 47.5 46.9
44.2 38.6 40.1 42.7 36.4 4061 Steel 0.0625 0.125
0.1875 0.25 0.3125 0.375 0.4375 0.5 0.5625
0.625 0.6875 0.75 0.8125 0.875 0.9375
1.0 1.125 1.25 1.375 1.5 1.625 1.75 1.875
2.0 2.25 2.5 2.75 3.0 3.25 3.5 3.75 4.0 66.2 66.4
66.5 68.5 67.6 61.3 65.1 60.8 60.6 61.4 57.8 58.2 53.8
55.9 51.9 56.6 52.3 55.0 53.5 51.8 49.8 51.9 52.0 47.7
49.7 49.7 45.5 45.8 45.1 22.9 32.0 26.3
Distance From Quenching (in)
Hardness (HRA)
Brinell Hardness (krg) vs. Rockwell A Hardness (hra)
BHN vs. Rockwell A 601.0 444.0 417.0 363.0
197.0 179.0 76.99 69.19 70.89 71.58
53.39 53.05
Brinell Hardness (krg)
Hardness (Rockwell A scale) hra
Rockwell A Hardness vs. Tempering Temperature 540.0
315.0 71.58 70.89
Tempering Temperature (C)
Hardness (Rockwell A scale)
Laboratory Experiment. Number 6 & 7
Heat Treatment and Hardenability of Steels
Submitted to fulfill the requirements of MSE 227/L T 7-9:50
College of Engineering and Computer Science
Manufacturing Systems Engineering and Management
April 2, 2013
Laboratory Experiment No. 6 & 7
Heat Treatment and Hardenability of Steels
Abstract
This experiment is attempted to measure the hardenability of the
steel and understand the process of heat treatment of different
materials at different cooling strategies. Cooling through
different procedures will cause the materials to have different
properties and different microstructures. Furthermore next stage
of experiment relates the cooling rate and hardness of 1045
steel and 4143 steel. This also helps in determine how alloying
a material permits it to be heat treated more homogeneously.
Investigated results also proven to be close enough to expected
results in obtaining higher brittleness with rapid cooling in and
to improve ductility the process of tempering is proven to be
very efficient with increase of tempering temperature the
hardness of material must be decrease. Last but not least, after
finishing experiment 6 the group found out that the lower the
tempering temperature the lower the hardness. Also, the results
that the group found from experiment 7 after finishing it proved
being inconsistent from what it should be.
Introduction
The purpose of this experiment is to determine what effect heat
treating and then cooling has on the hardness and grain
structure of two different types of steel. The two different types
of steels were utilized are 1045 steel samples and 4143 steel
sample which is considered to be a low-alloy steel.
The heat-treating process is a method to alter physical and
mechanical properties of the material. The heat-treating process
is consists of three crucial steps of annealing, hardening, and
tempering. Annealing is primarily used to soften and to induce
the ductility of the specimens by heating and holding at suitable
temperature and then cooling, by instantly quenching in the
water, which produces the higher brittleness with low ductility
and toughness in the specimens. Moreover, tempering is a
process of heat-treating, which is used to increase the toughness
of metal. Tempering is important because it used to achieve
desired hardness. To restore some the toughness and impact
properties is obtained by tempering where specimens are
reheated to a temperature between 5000 F and 10000 F for
certain time which removes the internal strain caused by sudden
cooling in the quenching bath without a large decrease in
hardness or strength.
In attempting the first phase of the experiment it cannot
determined why some heat-treated materials don’t reach a high
hardness when cooled at certain temperature. With the hardness
test the hardness of a material can be determined. The
Hardenability is a property that determines the depth and
distribution of hardness when steel is heated to a given
temperature and then quenched to reach martensitic structure,
which is obtained by performing Jominy test, where an
austenitized steel bar is quenched at one end only, thus
producing a range of cooling rates along the bar.
Procedure
First of all, the experiment provided six 1045 steel specimens
were for heat treating process, and for the second were only two
steel rods of 1045 steel and 4143 steel respectively used to
perform the Jominy test. In order to go though the details read
the following: First the group begin with identifying all each
specimen by punching different letter on to them using hammer.
Second, the engineer students heated all specimens at 16000 F
for 1/2 hour after obtaining the Rockwell a scale hardness
measurement. Third, The four samples were quenched in water,
one sample is allowed for air cool, and the other sample is set
for furnace cool for one hour and quenched in water. Then, the
two steel rods of different properties also allowed for heated at
16000 F for 45 minutes after obtaining the Rockwell scale
hardness measurements. Also, the group measured the Rockwell
a scale hardness on all six quenched specimens after being heat
treated and tempered the three-quenched specimen at different
temperature of 6000 F, 8000 F, and 10000 F respectively for 30
minutes. After tempering specimens then quenched in water.
Moreover, obtained hardness measurements using Brinell (3000
kg) and Rockwell A scale on all six steel specimens. In order to
perform the Jominy test one steel rod is then removed from the
furnace and is placed in the cooling tower for 10 minutes before
quenching in water, repeated the same procedure for other steel
rod. Finally, measured the hardness 1/16 inch for the first inch
and every 1/8 for the next inch and 1/4 for the next 2 inches
using Rockwell a scale for both steel rods.
Results and Discussions
The experiments “Heat Treatment of Steel” and “Hardenability
of Steel” are two different experiments, which show the effects
of heat-treating, and quenching of specimen provides different
hardness and microstructure in the materials. During first phase
of experiment the two specimens are left to cool at room
temperature and furnace temperature, these specimens were
quenched after an hour. The reason for this quenching after an
hour is due to the fact that the grains in the material are given a
chance to form when cooling at room temperature and furnace
cooling temperature. If the grains are not given enough time to
form when cooling at room and oven temperature the grain
structure would not be accurate as if actually air cooled and
furnace cooled. From the Table 1 it can be clearly seen the
hardness obtained through furnace cooled is lesser than
hardness obtained by air cooled specimens because in furnace
cooling allow the grains to from due to its slow cooling process
where as during air cool specimens tends to cool much quicker
compare to furnace cool and specimens have less time to form
grains. Due to that specimens will have more boundaries, which
mean there will be more interference with dislocation motion.
Also, in Table 1 it shows the Rockwell measurement is 76.99
for the instant quench. On the other hand, the furnace cooled is
55.05. Moreover, in Table 2 represent the Ultimate Tensile
strength (psi) for all samples from the average Brinell Hardness
number obtained. In fact, the hardness of both of the measured
BNH and the measured Rockwell are decreasing. The Ultimate
Tensile Strength (psi) is also decreasing because the hardness is
going down. As we know the harder a material is the higher the
strength is. Furthermore, the instant quenched sample has the
highest hardness and the Ultimate Tensile strength results.
Finally, Table 3 represents the hardness of the Steel 1045
sample after it has been placed at different tempering
temperatures. Moreover, Table 4 shows the difference in
hardness between Steel 1045 and Steel 4143 that that was taken
at different distance from the quenched end.
Table 1 Comparison between performed Brinell hardness
numbers measurements with Brinell hardness numbers obtained
by conversion of Rockwell A scale measurements.
Specimens
Rockwell
A scale
measurements
RHA Conversion to BHN
Dimple Diameters (mm)
BHN from Dimple Diameters
S instant quench
76.99
500
2.50
601
H Tempered @540 0C
71.58
390
3.20
363
D Tempered @ 430 0C
69.19
353
2.90
444
K Tempered @ 315 0C
70.89
381
2.81
417
M (air cooled)
53.39
172
4.29
197
E (Furnace cooled)
53.05
169
4.51
179
Table 2 Computed Ultimate Tensile strength (psi) based on the
average Brinell Hardness number obtained.
Specimens
Measured BHN
(3000)kg
Measured Rockwell A scale numbers (HRA )
Conversion BHN
Average BHN
Ultimate Tensile Strength (psi)
S
401
75.53
500
550.5
2.75E+05
D
429
71.71
353
398.5
1.99E+05
K
444
66.89
381
399
2.00E+05
H
388
66.99
390
376.5
1.88E+05
M
211
55.92
172
184.5
9.23E+04
E
363
52.10
169
174
8.70E+04
The obtained Brinell hardness comparing to Brinell hardness
obtained from the conversion scale of Rockwell A scale
hardness both results increase and decrease accordingly to the
hardness. The data represented in Table 1 and Figure 1 shows
that Brinell hardness increase in relation to the cooling rate and
heat treating hardness for Rockwell A scale hardness
measurements, but did not increase between specimens “K” and
“D” instead hardness went down. If both the Brinell hardness
and Rockwell a numbers were proportional to each other a
straight line would be seen. A graph like the one shown in
Figure 1 could be a result of an inaccurate machine or
inaccurate measurement taking strategies.
Figure 1 Brinell Hardness numbers vs. Rockwell A scale
numbers obtained after heat treating of the specimens.
Table 3 The hardness measurements obtained using Rockwell A
scale for three 1045 steel specimens that has been tempered at
different temperatures after being heat treated.
Specimens
Hardness Rockwell
A scale (HRA)
Tempering temperature ( c )
D
71.71
430
K
66.89
315
H
66.99
540
Figure 2 Hardness obtained using Rockwell A scale hardness
after tempering the specimens.
To obtain desired mechanical properties in steel specimens it is
necessary to process heat treating, quenching, and tempering of
the steel. Hardening is way of making steel harder, by first heat
treating the specimens to 8850 C for half hour and immediately
cools it by quenching the specimens in water, which increase
the brittleness of the substance at much higher rate with very
low ductility and toughness in the samples. The tempering is the
process through which brittleness is reduced to improve
ductility and toughness by heating the specimens at different
temperature for certain time.
Higher tempering temperature will yield a somewhat softer
material with higher toughness, whereas a lower tempering
temperature will produce a harder and somewhat more brittle
material, as shown by the Figure 2 where hardness increases
with the increase of tempering temperature.
The possible errors of not quenching the specimens in desired
time or factors of obtaining the hardness of the samples at
softer spot may have occurred in processing the tempering of
specimens, which resulted on the graphs for not obtaining
consistency.
The decline in hardness of tempered specimens once has been
heat treated and quenched in Table 3 proves the hypothesis of
decrease in brittleness by tempering the specimens.
The Ultimate tensile strength of materials is determined using
equation 1 by using data collected for Brinell hardness for all
the specimens mentioned in Table 2.
Equation 1 Calculating the Ultimate Tensile Strength of
materials.
In determining the strength, obtaining the hardness is great
ways of making comparison, which can be attain using
Rockwell A scale and Brinell hardness scale which is directly
proportional to the tensile strength. In using Brinell hardness
scale timing in maintaining the load on the specimens may have
been a factor of slight variation of results where as in Rockwell
A scale ha
From the Figure 4 the amount of carbide ((Fe3C) can be
calculated at temperature 1338 0F for 1045 steel using equation
2 where C1 is 45% because that is the weight percent of carbon
in 1045 steel. Ca and Cb calculated using the lever rule which
consists of drawing a line across to determine how much weight
percent of material there is in the steel, where “a” is alpha and
“b” is Iron Carbide (Fe3C). Using equation 2 is determined that
Iron carbide percent is about 0.68% and 99.32% is presumed to
be alpha phase.
Wb = (C1 – Ca)/(Cb – Ca) , Ca= 2.2%, and Cb= 65% are the
weight percent composition.
Equation 2 To find the Fe3C (carbide) content using weight
percent equation.
Figure 4 The iron-iron carbide phase diagram.
Different microstructures obtained when specimens processed
through differen cooling strategies that is why the TTT (Time,
Temperature, Transformation) chart in Figure 5 is proven to be
great tool in determining the microstructure. The TTT chart
shows the amount of time needed to quench a material to reach
a certain phase. The left part line represents the beginning of
the transformation and the right part line represents the
conclusion of the transformation. The TTT chart also explains
the need of quenching the specimens after an hour of cooling
due to after certain time the specimens does not require any
more transformation. The martensite structure which is one of
the hardest of all phases is obtained upon quenching instantly to
a low temperature. But the other samples that quenched were
temperd again to move higher up in the TTT chart where less
hardened materials are . To obtained a desired phase it is
neccsary to for rapid change in temperature with respect to time
when quenching the 1045 steel to reach a Bainite phase.
The specimens that were furnace cooled and cooled at room
temperature are most likely to fall in the pearlite phase where
the one cooled at room temperature is said to be fine pearlite
while the other one is more close to coarse pearlite due to slow
cooling process. The specimens tempered at 540°C falls
between pearlite and bainite phases. The specimens tempered at
430°C and 315°C fall under the Bainite phase, the one tempered
at a lower temperature could be classified as being of finer
Bainite.
Figure 5 The TTT (Time, Temperature, Transformation) chart
for 1045 steel.
Microstructure and hardness are closely correlated;
microstructure consists of grain size and crystal structure. When
the specimens were reached at austenite phase, the grains are
more uniform and homogeneously distributed; upon completion
of this process the specimens are ready to be cooled in order to
obtain different hardeneability in the material. During instant
quenching of the specimens the specimens with evenly
distributed grains are not given a chance to form and are then
solidified giving the material a fine grain structure in contrast
to a material slowly cooling which gives a material more coarse
grains making the material less hard and more ductile. The
Jominy test results illustrated in Figure 3 prove that how
cooling rate affects hardness data obtained on the attempt of
experiment. The greater distance of quenching the less hard the
material is because, as mentioned before, the grains are given
more time to form, and the bigger the grains the less hard the
material. The inconsistency among results obtained instead of
constantly moving downward may have caused due to
experimental errors such as not placing it fast enough on the
Jominy tester. The graph line obtained by the 4143steel and
1045 steel quickly goes up and down not opening the water
enough for quenching during the Jominy test. The overall graph
is also does not matches to the expected results where 1045
steel graph must lower than the graph line obtained by the 4061
steel rod specimen is considered to be an experimental error of
not transporting the specimen on the tester with in time
duration.
Table 4 The Jominy test results obtained on two steel rods.
Distance from quenched end (in)
1045 Steel
4143 Steel
0.0625
75.9
66.2
0.125
72.2
66.4
0.1875
61.7
66.5
0.25
50.3
68.5
0.3125
58.2
67.6
0.375
56.9
61.3
0.4375
55.6
65.1
0.5
55.9
60.8
0.5625
53.6
60.6
0.625
55.7
61.4
0.6875
54.4
57.8
0.75
49.7
58.2
0.8125
51.8
53.8
0.875
51.2
55.9
0.9375
51.6
51.9
1
50.2
56.6
1.125
49.2
52.3
1.25
50.8
55
1.375
50.5
53.5
1.5
48.4
51.8
1.625
49.2
49.8
1.75
49.1
51.9
1.875
47.8
52
2
47.2
47.7
2.25
47.3
49.7
2.5
47.5
49.7
2.75
46.9
45.5
3
44.2
45.8
3.25
38.6
45.1
3.5
40.1
22.9
3.75
42.7
32
4
36.4
26.3
Figure 3 Plot showing Hardness as a function of distance from
the quenched end for 1045 steel and 4061 steel specimens. The
dash line is the Steel 4061 and the solid line is the Steel 1045.
Conclusion
Materials that cool at slower cooling rates tend to be softer
materials while those that are cooled at faster cooling rates tend
to be harder. Tempering a material lowers its ultimate strength
but increases the amount of stress the material can absorb
(toughness), higher the tempering temperature the lower the
ultimate strength. Tempering also adds more ductile
characteristics to the material. High hardness in materials only
can be attain when there is a low toughness, in order to acquire
toughness in a material that has been quenched, The tempering
of the specimens is then processed to improve the toughness in
the material and lower the brittleness.Fine grain structures tend
to be hard material where as materials with coarse grain
structure has more ductile properties. Furthermore, the data
does not accurately show what should be happening. The data I
collected has error that is obviously shows in my graph. The
graph should show a straight line going down similar to the one
in experiment 6. For example, after heating the Steel and
quenched it the group had to measured it and probably by
mistake the engineer student measured the same point twice or
took similar points close to each other. Also, maybe the time it
took to move the Steel from furnace to be quenched was too
long which effected the measurements. Moreover, the water that
was used to quench could have been too strong hitting the
specimen, which leads to make a huge differences in
measurements.
References
D. Callister Jr, Fundamentals of Materials Science and
Engineering, J. Wiley & Sons, NY, 3rd Ed. 2008, Flinn and
Trojan, Engineering Materials and Their Application, Chapter 6
Dieter, Mechanical Metallurgy ASM Handbook on Heat
Treatment, Vol. 2
http://www.smt.sandvik.com/en/products/strip-steel-and-strip-
based-products/strip-products/knife-steel/hardening-
guide/purpose-of-hardening-and-tempering/
http://www.carbidedepot.com/formulas-hardness.htm
William D. Callister, Jr., David G. Rethwisch. Fundamentals of
materials science and engineering, third edition
www.csun.edu/~bavarian/Courses/MSE%20227/Labs/2-
Charpy_test.pdf
Brinell Hardness (krg) vs. Rockwell A Hardness (hra)
BHN vs. Rockwell A 601 444 417 363 197 179
76.989999999999995 69.19 70.89 71.58
53.39 53.05
Brinell Hardness (krg)
Hardness (Rockwell A scale) hra
Rockwell A Hardness vs. Tempering Temperature 540 315
71.58 70.89
Tempering Temperature (C)
Hardness (Rockwell A scale)
Distance From Quenching (in) vs. Hardness (HRA)
1045 Steel 6.25E-2 0.125 0.1875 0.25 0.3125
0.375 0.4375 0.5 0.5625 0.625 0.6875
0.75 0.8125 0.875 0.9375 1 1.125 1.25
1.375 1.5 1.625 1.75 1.875 2 2.25 2.5
2.75 3 3.25 3.5 3.75 4 75.900000000000006
72.2 61.7 50.3 58.2 56.9 55.6 55.9 53.6 55.7 54.4 49.7
51.8 51.2 51.6 50.2 49.2 50.8 50.5 48.4 49.2 49.1 47.8
47.2 47.3 47.5 46.9 44.2 38.6 40.1 42.7 36.4 4061 Steel
6.25E-2 0.125 0.1875 0.25 0.3125 0.375
0.4375 0.5 0.5625 0.625 0.6875 0.75 0.8125
0.875 0.9375 1 1.125 1.25 1.375 1.5
1.625 1.75 1.875 2 2.25 2.5 2.75 3 3.25
3.5 3.75 4 66.2 66.400000000000006 66.5 68.5
67.599999999999994 61.3 65.099999999999994
60.8 60.6 61.4 57.8 58.2 53.8 55.9 51.9 56.6 52.3 55
53.5 51.8 49.8 51.9 52 47.7 49.7 49.7 45.5 45.8 45.1
22.9 32 26.3
Distance From Quenching (in)
Hardness (HRA)

More Related Content

Similar to Assignment Instructions.GETTING STARTED The next assignments wi.docx

1 P a g e Assignment Assignm.docx
1  P a g e  Assignment  Assignm.docx1  P a g e  Assignment  Assignm.docx
1 P a g e Assignment Assignm.docx
oswald1horne84988
 
Lab report michael chang
Lab report michael changLab report michael chang
Lab report michael changmichael20102010
 
Informational Essay Topics.pdf
Informational Essay Topics.pdfInformational Essay Topics.pdf
Informational Essay Topics.pdf
Jennifer Reese
 
Creative Ways To Write A Paper
Creative Ways To Write A PaperCreative Ways To Write A Paper
Creative Ways To Write A Paper
Victoria Barraza
 
Data Collection and Technology.htmlUnit III ProjectWeigh
Data Collection and Technology.htmlUnit III ProjectWeighData Collection and Technology.htmlUnit III ProjectWeigh
Data Collection and Technology.htmlUnit III ProjectWeigh
OllieShoresna
 
Laboratory organization, management and safety methods - Chapter # 03 : LABOR...
Laboratory organization, management and safety methods - Chapter # 03 : LABOR...Laboratory organization, management and safety methods - Chapter # 03 : LABOR...
Laboratory organization, management and safety methods - Chapter # 03 : LABOR...
EqraBaig
 
How to write Negative Messages
How to write Negative MessagesHow to write Negative Messages
How to write Negative Messages
Hoa PN Thaycacac
 

Similar to Assignment Instructions.GETTING STARTED The next assignments wi.docx (7)

1 P a g e Assignment Assignm.docx
1  P a g e  Assignment  Assignm.docx1  P a g e  Assignment  Assignm.docx
1 P a g e Assignment Assignm.docx
 
Lab report michael chang
Lab report michael changLab report michael chang
Lab report michael chang
 
Informational Essay Topics.pdf
Informational Essay Topics.pdfInformational Essay Topics.pdf
Informational Essay Topics.pdf
 
Creative Ways To Write A Paper
Creative Ways To Write A PaperCreative Ways To Write A Paper
Creative Ways To Write A Paper
 
Data Collection and Technology.htmlUnit III ProjectWeigh
Data Collection and Technology.htmlUnit III ProjectWeighData Collection and Technology.htmlUnit III ProjectWeigh
Data Collection and Technology.htmlUnit III ProjectWeigh
 
Laboratory organization, management and safety methods - Chapter # 03 : LABOR...
Laboratory organization, management and safety methods - Chapter # 03 : LABOR...Laboratory organization, management and safety methods - Chapter # 03 : LABOR...
Laboratory organization, management and safety methods - Chapter # 03 : LABOR...
 
How to write Negative Messages
How to write Negative MessagesHow to write Negative Messages
How to write Negative Messages
 

More from ssuser562afc1

Pick an Apollo Mission that went to the Moon.  Some mission only orb.docx
Pick an Apollo Mission that went to the Moon.  Some mission only orb.docxPick an Apollo Mission that went to the Moon.  Some mission only orb.docx
Pick an Apollo Mission that went to the Moon.  Some mission only orb.docx
ssuser562afc1
 
Pick a topic from data.gov that has large number of data sets on wid.docx
Pick a topic from data.gov that has large number of data sets on wid.docxPick a topic from data.gov that has large number of data sets on wid.docx
Pick a topic from data.gov that has large number of data sets on wid.docx
ssuser562afc1
 
Pick an animal with sophisticated communication. Quickly find and re.docx
Pick an animal with sophisticated communication. Quickly find and re.docxPick an animal with sophisticated communication. Quickly find and re.docx
Pick an animal with sophisticated communication. Quickly find and re.docx
ssuser562afc1
 
Pick a real healthcare organization or create your own. Think about .docx
Pick a real healthcare organization or create your own. Think about .docxPick a real healthcare organization or create your own. Think about .docx
Pick a real healthcare organization or create your own. Think about .docx
ssuser562afc1
 
PHYS 102In the Real World” Discussion TopicsYou may choose yo.docx
PHYS 102In the Real World” Discussion TopicsYou may choose yo.docxPHYS 102In the Real World” Discussion TopicsYou may choose yo.docx
PHYS 102In the Real World” Discussion TopicsYou may choose yo.docx
ssuser562afc1
 
Photosynthesis and Cellular RespirationCellular respiration .docx
Photosynthesis and Cellular RespirationCellular respiration .docxPhotosynthesis and Cellular RespirationCellular respiration .docx
Photosynthesis and Cellular RespirationCellular respiration .docx
ssuser562afc1
 
Philosophy of Inclusion Research SupportIt is not enough to simp.docx
Philosophy of Inclusion Research SupportIt is not enough to simp.docxPhilosophy of Inclusion Research SupportIt is not enough to simp.docx
Philosophy of Inclusion Research SupportIt is not enough to simp.docx
ssuser562afc1
 
PHYSICS DATA SHEET.docx
PHYSICS DATA SHEET.docxPHYSICS DATA SHEET.docx
PHYSICS DATA SHEET.docx
ssuser562afc1
 
Physical Assessment Reflection Consider your learning and gr.docx
Physical Assessment Reflection Consider your learning and gr.docxPhysical Assessment Reflection Consider your learning and gr.docx
Physical Assessment Reflection Consider your learning and gr.docx
ssuser562afc1
 
Phonemic Awareness TableTaskScriptingDescription and.docx
Phonemic Awareness TableTaskScriptingDescription and.docxPhonemic Awareness TableTaskScriptingDescription and.docx
Phonemic Awareness TableTaskScriptingDescription and.docx
ssuser562afc1
 
Philosophy 2582 - Media Ethics Paper 1 (Noam Chomsky) 
.docx
Philosophy 2582 - Media Ethics Paper 1 (Noam Chomsky) 
.docxPhilosophy 2582 - Media Ethics Paper 1 (Noam Chomsky) 
.docx
Philosophy 2582 - Media Ethics Paper 1 (Noam Chomsky) 
.docx
ssuser562afc1
 
Pick a large company you like. Find their Statement of Cash Flow.docx
Pick a large company you like. Find their Statement of Cash Flow.docxPick a large company you like. Find their Statement of Cash Flow.docx
Pick a large company you like. Find their Statement of Cash Flow.docx
ssuser562afc1
 
Philosophy 7 Asian Philosophy (Fall 2019) Paper Guidelines .docx
Philosophy 7 Asian Philosophy (Fall 2019) Paper Guidelines .docxPhilosophy 7 Asian Philosophy (Fall 2019) Paper Guidelines .docx
Philosophy 7 Asian Philosophy (Fall 2019) Paper Guidelines .docx
ssuser562afc1
 
PIC.jpga.zipAPA.pptAPA Style--Review.docx
PIC.jpga.zipAPA.pptAPA Style--Review.docxPIC.jpga.zipAPA.pptAPA Style--Review.docx
PIC.jpga.zipAPA.pptAPA Style--Review.docx
ssuser562afc1
 
PHIL101 B008 Win 20 ! # AssignmentsAssignmentsAssignmen.docx
PHIL101 B008 Win 20  !  # AssignmentsAssignmentsAssignmen.docxPHIL101 B008 Win 20  !  # AssignmentsAssignmentsAssignmen.docx
PHIL101 B008 Win 20 ! # AssignmentsAssignmentsAssignmen.docx
ssuser562afc1
 
Phase 3 Structured Probl.docx
Phase 3 Structured Probl.docxPhase 3 Structured Probl.docx
Phase 3 Structured Probl.docx
ssuser562afc1
 
Phil 2101 Final PaperGuidelines Approximately 5 pages, doubl.docx
Phil 2101 Final PaperGuidelines Approximately 5 pages, doubl.docxPhil 2101 Final PaperGuidelines Approximately 5 pages, doubl.docx
Phil 2101 Final PaperGuidelines Approximately 5 pages, doubl.docx
ssuser562afc1
 
Perspectives on WarInstructionsAnalyze After watching .docx
Perspectives on WarInstructionsAnalyze After watching .docxPerspectives on WarInstructionsAnalyze After watching .docx
Perspectives on WarInstructionsAnalyze After watching .docx
ssuser562afc1
 
pestle research for chile bolivia paraguay uruguay .docx
pestle research for chile bolivia paraguay uruguay .docxpestle research for chile bolivia paraguay uruguay .docx
pestle research for chile bolivia paraguay uruguay .docx
ssuser562afc1
 
Pg. 04Question Four Assignment 2Deadline Saturd.docx
Pg. 04Question Four Assignment 2Deadline Saturd.docxPg. 04Question Four Assignment 2Deadline Saturd.docx
Pg. 04Question Four Assignment 2Deadline Saturd.docx
ssuser562afc1
 

More from ssuser562afc1 (20)

Pick an Apollo Mission that went to the Moon.  Some mission only orb.docx
Pick an Apollo Mission that went to the Moon.  Some mission only orb.docxPick an Apollo Mission that went to the Moon.  Some mission only orb.docx
Pick an Apollo Mission that went to the Moon.  Some mission only orb.docx
 
Pick a topic from data.gov that has large number of data sets on wid.docx
Pick a topic from data.gov that has large number of data sets on wid.docxPick a topic from data.gov that has large number of data sets on wid.docx
Pick a topic from data.gov that has large number of data sets on wid.docx
 
Pick an animal with sophisticated communication. Quickly find and re.docx
Pick an animal with sophisticated communication. Quickly find and re.docxPick an animal with sophisticated communication. Quickly find and re.docx
Pick an animal with sophisticated communication. Quickly find and re.docx
 
Pick a real healthcare organization or create your own. Think about .docx
Pick a real healthcare organization or create your own. Think about .docxPick a real healthcare organization or create your own. Think about .docx
Pick a real healthcare organization or create your own. Think about .docx
 
PHYS 102In the Real World” Discussion TopicsYou may choose yo.docx
PHYS 102In the Real World” Discussion TopicsYou may choose yo.docxPHYS 102In the Real World” Discussion TopicsYou may choose yo.docx
PHYS 102In the Real World” Discussion TopicsYou may choose yo.docx
 
Photosynthesis and Cellular RespirationCellular respiration .docx
Photosynthesis and Cellular RespirationCellular respiration .docxPhotosynthesis and Cellular RespirationCellular respiration .docx
Photosynthesis and Cellular RespirationCellular respiration .docx
 
Philosophy of Inclusion Research SupportIt is not enough to simp.docx
Philosophy of Inclusion Research SupportIt is not enough to simp.docxPhilosophy of Inclusion Research SupportIt is not enough to simp.docx
Philosophy of Inclusion Research SupportIt is not enough to simp.docx
 
PHYSICS DATA SHEET.docx
PHYSICS DATA SHEET.docxPHYSICS DATA SHEET.docx
PHYSICS DATA SHEET.docx
 
Physical Assessment Reflection Consider your learning and gr.docx
Physical Assessment Reflection Consider your learning and gr.docxPhysical Assessment Reflection Consider your learning and gr.docx
Physical Assessment Reflection Consider your learning and gr.docx
 
Phonemic Awareness TableTaskScriptingDescription and.docx
Phonemic Awareness TableTaskScriptingDescription and.docxPhonemic Awareness TableTaskScriptingDescription and.docx
Phonemic Awareness TableTaskScriptingDescription and.docx
 
Philosophy 2582 - Media Ethics Paper 1 (Noam Chomsky) 
.docx
Philosophy 2582 - Media Ethics Paper 1 (Noam Chomsky) 
.docxPhilosophy 2582 - Media Ethics Paper 1 (Noam Chomsky) 
.docx
Philosophy 2582 - Media Ethics Paper 1 (Noam Chomsky) 
.docx
 
Pick a large company you like. Find their Statement of Cash Flow.docx
Pick a large company you like. Find their Statement of Cash Flow.docxPick a large company you like. Find their Statement of Cash Flow.docx
Pick a large company you like. Find their Statement of Cash Flow.docx
 
Philosophy 7 Asian Philosophy (Fall 2019) Paper Guidelines .docx
Philosophy 7 Asian Philosophy (Fall 2019) Paper Guidelines .docxPhilosophy 7 Asian Philosophy (Fall 2019) Paper Guidelines .docx
Philosophy 7 Asian Philosophy (Fall 2019) Paper Guidelines .docx
 
PIC.jpga.zipAPA.pptAPA Style--Review.docx
PIC.jpga.zipAPA.pptAPA Style--Review.docxPIC.jpga.zipAPA.pptAPA Style--Review.docx
PIC.jpga.zipAPA.pptAPA Style--Review.docx
 
PHIL101 B008 Win 20 ! # AssignmentsAssignmentsAssignmen.docx
PHIL101 B008 Win 20  !  # AssignmentsAssignmentsAssignmen.docxPHIL101 B008 Win 20  !  # AssignmentsAssignmentsAssignmen.docx
PHIL101 B008 Win 20 ! # AssignmentsAssignmentsAssignmen.docx
 
Phase 3 Structured Probl.docx
Phase 3 Structured Probl.docxPhase 3 Structured Probl.docx
Phase 3 Structured Probl.docx
 
Phil 2101 Final PaperGuidelines Approximately 5 pages, doubl.docx
Phil 2101 Final PaperGuidelines Approximately 5 pages, doubl.docxPhil 2101 Final PaperGuidelines Approximately 5 pages, doubl.docx
Phil 2101 Final PaperGuidelines Approximately 5 pages, doubl.docx
 
Perspectives on WarInstructionsAnalyze After watching .docx
Perspectives on WarInstructionsAnalyze After watching .docxPerspectives on WarInstructionsAnalyze After watching .docx
Perspectives on WarInstructionsAnalyze After watching .docx
 
pestle research for chile bolivia paraguay uruguay .docx
pestle research for chile bolivia paraguay uruguay .docxpestle research for chile bolivia paraguay uruguay .docx
pestle research for chile bolivia paraguay uruguay .docx
 
Pg. 04Question Four Assignment 2Deadline Saturd.docx
Pg. 04Question Four Assignment 2Deadline Saturd.docxPg. 04Question Four Assignment 2Deadline Saturd.docx
Pg. 04Question Four Assignment 2Deadline Saturd.docx
 

Recently uploaded

Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativeEmbracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Peter Windle
 
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCECLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
BhavyaRajput3
 
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPhrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
MIRIAMSALINAS13
 
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
Sandy Millin
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
Delapenabediema
 
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
Levi Shapiro
 
Lapbook sobre os Regimes Totalitários.pdf
Lapbook sobre os Regimes Totalitários.pdfLapbook sobre os Regimes Totalitários.pdf
Lapbook sobre os Regimes Totalitários.pdf
Jean Carlos Nunes Paixão
 
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9  .docxAcetabularia Information For Class 9  .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
vaibhavrinwa19
 
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxSynthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Pavel ( NSTU)
 
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfThe Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
kaushalkr1407
 
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptxChapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Mohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
 
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxHonest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
timhan337
 
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Atul Kumar Singh
 
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdfspecial B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
Special education needs
 
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free downloadThe French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
Vivekanand Anglo Vedic Academy
 
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech RepublicPolish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Anna Sz.
 
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptxThe approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
Jisc
 
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
Ashokrao Mane college of Pharmacy Peth-Vadgaon
 
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
MysoreMuleSoftMeetup
 
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativeEmbracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
 
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCECLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
 
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPhrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
 
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
 
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
 
Lapbook sobre os Regimes Totalitários.pdf
Lapbook sobre os Regimes Totalitários.pdfLapbook sobre os Regimes Totalitários.pdf
Lapbook sobre os Regimes Totalitários.pdf
 
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9  .docxAcetabularia Information For Class 9  .docx
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
 
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxSynthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
 
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfThe Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
 
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptxChapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
 
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxHonest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
 
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
 
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdfspecial B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
 
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free downloadThe French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
 
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech RepublicPolish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
 
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptxThe approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
 
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
 
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
 
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
 

Assignment Instructions.GETTING STARTED The next assignments wi.docx

  • 1. Assignment Instructions. GETTING STARTED: The next assignments will focus on an established non-profit organization called Engineers Without Borders. This organization’s website can be found here: http://www.ewb-usa.org/. This information will be necessary to complete this Projects. SCENARIO: You are still working with the brochures that you produced in the previous assignment. You must take them to a printer. In the past, the printing company, Gonzales and Sons, Inc., 8852 Westheimer, Houston, TX, has printed brochures for you in the past and has produced excellent work. Because EWB is a not-for-profit organization, this printing company has for the past seven years offered to print to 1,000 brochures at a 50% reduction of normal costs as a “donation” to EWB. However, this has been a bad economic year for Gonzales and Sons, and they feel they cannot offer you the 50% discount anymore. The printing company needs to write a bad news letter to EWB telling them the organization telling them. YOUR TASK: · As the accounts manager of Gonzales and Sons, write a “bad news” letter to EWB in correct business letter format. For specific information on this, review the guidelines about letters, specifically the areas about bad news and adjustments/refusals. (You can find the guidelines below this assignment instructions) · Tell them what you can do, though, to salvage a good business relationship. · Sign your name. The person signing is the accounts manager. · Define the purpose of the letter by deciding what you want the reader to do when he or she has finished reading the letter. Write an appropriate action statement for use in the letter. Because your request falls in the category of bad news, organize the letter using an indirect pattern. A good way to remember this is the “sandwich” method: start with good news, then the bad news, then end with good news.
  • 2. · Provide logical reasoning, explanations, and details when needed. · Cushion the bad news, perhaps suggesting a compromise. · Present material with concision, clarity, and fluency. · Tell your readers which enclosures you would send with this letter. · Determine if anybody else would need a copy of the letter and make necessary notations if so. FORMATTING: If you need to review the requirements for standard business-like letters, refer to the “Bad News” and “Adjustments / Refusals.” guidelines below. GUIDELINES for Conveying Bad News* · Don’t Procrastinate. As much as people may dislike the news, they will feel doubly offended after being kept in the day. Never just blurt it out. Set a considerate tone by prefacing your bad news with considerate terms such as I regret, We’re sorry, or Unfortunately. Instead of flatly proclaiming Your application has been denied, give recipients information they can use: Unfortunately, we are unable to offer you admission to this year’s program. This letter will explain why we made this decision and how you can reapply. Provide a context that leads into your explanation. · Give a clear and honest explanation. Don’t make things worse by fogging or dodging the issue. · When you need to apologize, do so immediately. Place your apology right up front. Don’t say An error was made in calculating your construction bill. Do say we are sorry we made a mistake in calculating your construction
  • 3. bill. Don’t attempt to camouflage the error. Don’t offer excuses or try to shift the blame. · Use the passive voice to avoid accusations but not to dodge responsibility. Instead of You used the wrong bolts, say The wrong bolts were used. · Do not use “you” to blame the reader. Instead of You did not send a deposit, say We have not received your deposit. GUIDELINE for Adjustment Letters Granting Adjustment · Begin with the good news. A sincere apology helps rebuild customers’ confidence. · Explain what went wrong and how the problem will be corrected. Without an honest explanation you leave the impression that such problems are common or beyond your control. · Name blame employees as scapegoats. To blame someone in the firm reflects poorly on the firm itself. · Do not promise that the problem never will recur. Mishaps are inevitable. · End on a positive note. Focus on the solution, not the problem. Refusing Adjustment · Use an indirect organizational plan. Explain diplomatically and clearly why you are refusing the request. Your goal is to convince the reader that your refusal results from a thorough analysis of the situation.
  • 4. · Be sure the refusal is unambiguous. Don’t create unrealistic expectations by using evasive language. · Avoid a patronizing or accusing tone. Use the passive voice so as not to accuse the claimant, but do not hide behind the passive voice. · Close courteously and positively. Offer an alternative or compromise, when it is feasible to do so. Laboratory Experiment. Number 6 & 7 Heat Treatment and Hardenability of Steels Submitted to fulfill the requirements of MSE 227/L T 7-9:50 California State University, Northridge College of Engineering and Computer Science Manufacturing Systems Engineering and Management Coach: Tony Magee April 2, 2013 Team No.4 Naif Alabdullatef Abdulaziz Aljamaan Naif Alolaiwi Daniel Curry Prepared By: Naif Alabdullatef Laboratory Experiment No. 6 & 7 Heat Treatment and Hardenability of Steels Abstract This experiment is attempted to measure the hardenability of the steel and understand the process of heat treatment of different
  • 5. materials at different cooling strategies. Cooling through different procedures will cause the materials to have different properties and different microstructures. Furthermore next stage of experiment relates the cooling rate and hardness of 1045 steel and 4143 steel. This also helps in determine how alloying a material permits it to be heat treated more homogeneously. Investigated results also proven to be close enough to expected results in obtaining higher brittleness with rapid cooling in and to improve ductility the process of tempering is proven to be very efficient with increase of tempering temperature the hardness of material must be decrease. Last but not least, after finishing experiment 6 the group found out that the lower the tempering temperature the lower the hardness. Also, the results that the group found from experiment 7 after finishing it proved being inconsistent from what it should be. Introduction The purpose of this experiment is to determine what effect heat treating and then cooling has on the hardness and grain structure of two different types of steel. The two different types of steels were utilized are 1045 steel samples and 4143 steel sample which is considered to be a low-alloy steel. The heat-treating process is a method to alter physical and mechanical properties of the material. The heat-treating process is consists of three crucial steps of annealing, hardening, and tempering. Annealing is primarily used to soften and to induce the ductility of the specimens by heating and holding at suitable temperature and then cooling, by instantly quenching in the water, which produces the higher brittleness with low ductility and toughness in the specimens. Moreover, tempering is a process of heat-treating, which is used to increase the toughness of metal. Tempering is important because it used to achieve desired hardness. To restore some the toughness and impact properties is obtained by tempering where specimens are reheated to a temperature between 5000 F and 10000 F for certain time which removes the internal strain caused by sudden cooling in the quenching bath without a large decrease in
  • 6. hardness or strength. In attempting the first phase of the experiment it cannot determined why some heat-treated materials don’t reach a high hardness when cooled at certain temperature. With the hardness test the hardness of a material can be determined. The Hardenability is a property that determines the depth and distribution of hardness when steel is heated to a given temperature and then quenched to reach martensitic structure, which is obtained by performing Jominy test, where an austenitized steel bar is quenched at one end only, thus producing a range of cooling rates along the bar. Procedure First of all, the experiment provided six 1045 steel specimens were for heat treating process, and for the second were only two steel rods of 1045 steel and 4143 steel respectively used to perform the Jominy test. In order to go though the details read the following: First the group begin with identifying all each specimen by punching different letter on to them using hammer. Second, the engineer students heated all specimens at 16000 F for 1/2 hour after obtaining the Rockwell a scale hardness measurement. Third, The four samples were quenched in water, one sample is allowed for air cool, and the other sample is set for furnace cool for one hour and quenched in water. Then, the two steel rods of different properties also allowed for heated at 16000 F for 45 minutes after obtaining the Rockwell scale hardness measurements. Also, the group measured the Rockwell a scale hardness on all six quenched specimens after being heat treated and tempered the three-quenched specimen at different temperature of 6000 F, 8000 F, and 10000 F respectively for 30 minutes. After tempering specimens then quenched in water. Moreover, obtained hardness measurements using Brinell (3000 kg) and Rockwell A scale on all six steel specimens. In order to perform the Jominy test one steel rod is then removed from the furnace and is placed in the cooling tower for 10 minutes before quenching in water, repeated the same procedure for other steel rod. Finally, measured the hardness 1/16 inch for the first inch
  • 7. and every 1/8 for the next inch and 1/4 for the next 2 inches using Rockwell a scale for both steel rods. Results and Discussions The experiments “Heat Treatment of Steel” and “Hardenability of Steel” are two different experiments, which show the effects of heat-treating, and quenching of specimen provides different hardness and microstructure in the materials. During first phase of experiment the two specimens are left to cool at room temperature and furnace temperature, these specimens were quenched after an hour. The reason for this quenching after an hour is due to the fact that the grains in the material are given a chance to form when cooling at room temperature and furnace cooling temperature. If the grains are not given enough time to form when cooling at room and oven temperature the grain structure would not be accurate as if actually air cooled and furnace cooled. From the Table 1 it can be clearly seen the hardness obtained through furnace cooled is lesser than hardness obtained by air cooled specimens because in furnace cooling allow the grains to from due to its slow cooling process where as during air cool specimens tends to cool much quicker compare to furnace cool and specimens have less time to form grains. Due to that specimens will have more boundaries, which mean there will be more interference with dislocation motion. Also, in Table 1 it shows the Rockwell measurement is 76.99 for the instant quench. On the other hand, the furnace cooled is 55.05. Moreover, in Table 2 represent the Ultimate Tensile strength (psi) for all samples from the average Brinell Hardness number obtained. In fact, the hardness of both of the measured BNH and the measured Rockwell are decreasing. The Ultimate Tensile Strength (psi) is also decreasing because the hardness is going down. As we know the harder a material is the higher the strength is. Furthermore, the instant quenched sample has the highest hardness and the Ultimate Tensile strength results. Finally, Table 3 represents the hardness of the Steel 1045 sample after it has been placed at different tempering temperatures. Moreover, Table 4 shows the difference in
  • 8. hardness between Steel 1045 and Steel 4143 that that was taken at different distance from the quenched end. Table 1 Comparison between performed Brinell hardness numbers measurements with Brinell hardness numbers obtained by conversion of Rockwell A scale measurements. Specimens Rockwell A scale measurements RHA Conversion to BHN Dimple Diameters (mm) BHN from Dimple Diameters S instant quench 76.99 500 2.50 601 H Tempered @540 0C 71.58 390 3.20 363 D Tempered @ 430 0C 69.19 353 2.90 444 K Tempered @ 315 0C 70.89 381 2.81 417 M (air cooled) 53.39 172
  • 9. 4.29 197 E (Furnace cooled) 53.05 169 4.51 179 Table 2 Computed Ultimate Tensile strength (psi) based on the average Brinell Hardness number obtained. Specimens Measured BHN (3000)kg Measured Rockwell A scale numbers (HRA ) Conversion BHN Average BHN Ultimate Tensile Strength (psi) S 401 75.53 500 550.5 2.75E+05 D 429 71.71 353 398.5 1.99E+05 K 444 66.89 381 399 2.00E+05
  • 10. H 388 66.99 390 376.5 1.88E+05 M 211 55.92 172 184.5 9.23E+04 E 363 52.10 169 174 8.70E+04 The obtained Brinell hardness comparing to Brinell hardness obtained from the conversion scale of Rockwell A scale hardness both results increase and decrease accordingly to the hardness. The data represented in Table 1 and Figure 1 shows that Brinell hardness increase in relation to the cooling rate and heat treating hardness for Rockwell A scale hardness measurements, but did not increase between specimens “K” and “D” instead hardness went down. If both the Brinell hardness and Rockwell a numbers were proportional to each other a straight line would be seen. A graph like the one shown in Figure 1 could be a result of an inaccurate machine or inaccurate measurement taking strategies. Figure 1 Brinell Hardness numbers vs. Rockwell A scale numbers obtained after heat treating of the specimens. Table 3 The hardness measurements obtained using Rockwell A
  • 11. scale for three 1045 steel specimens that has been tempered at different temperatures after being heat treated. Specimens Hardness Rockwell A scale (HRA) Tempering temperature ( c ) D 71.71 430 K 66.89 315 H 66.99 540 Figure 2 Hardness obtained using Rockwell A scale hardness after tempering the specimens. To obtain desired mechanical properties in steel specimens it is necessary to process heat treating, quenching, and tempering of the steel. Hardening is way of making steel harder, by first heat treating the specimens to 8850 C for half hour and immediately cools it by quenching the specimens in water, which increase the brittleness of the substance at much higher rate with very low ductility and toughness in the samples. The tempering is the process through which brittleness is reduced to improve ductility and toughness by heating the specimens at different temperature for certain time. Higher tempering temperature will yield a somewhat softer material with higher toughness, whereas a lower tempering temperature will produce a harder and somewhat more brittle material, as shown by the Figure 2 where hardness increases with the increase of tempering temperature. The possible errors of not quenching the specimens in desired time or factors of obtaining the hardness of the samples at
  • 12. softer spot may have occurred in processing the tempering of specimens, which resulted on the graphs for not obtaining consistency. The decline in hardness of tempered specimens once has been heat treated and quenched in Table 3 proves the hypothesis of decrease in brittleness by tempering the specimens. The Ultimate tensile strength of materials is determined using equation 1 by using data collected for Brinell hardness for all the specimens mentioned in Table 2. Equation 1 Calculating the Ultimate Tensile Strength of materials. In determining the strength, obtaining the hardness is great ways of making comparison, which can be attain using Rockwell A scale and Brinell hardness scale which is directly proportional to the tensile strength. In using Brinell hardness scale timing in maintaining the load on the specimens may have been a factor of slight variation of results where as in Rockwell A scale ha From the Figure 4 the amount of carbide ((Fe3C) can be calculated at temperature 1338 0F for 1045 steel using equation 2 where C1 is 45% because that is the weight percent of carbon in 1045 steel. Ca and Cb calculated using the lever rule which consists of drawing a line across to determine how much weight percent of material there is in the steel, where “a” is alpha and “b” is Iron Carbide (Fe3C). Using equation 2 is determined that Iron carbide percent is about 0.68% and 99.32% is presumed to be alpha phase. Wb = (C1 – Ca)/(Cb – Ca) , Ca= 2.2%, and Cb= 65% are the weight percent composition. Equation 2 To find the Fe3C (carbide) content using weight percent equation. Figure 4 The iron-iron carbide phase diagram. Different microstructures obtained when specimens processed
  • 13. through differen cooling strategies that is why the TTT (Time, Temperature, Transformation) chart in Figure 5 is proven to be great tool in determining the microstructure. The TTT chart shows the amount of time needed to quench a material to reach a certain phase. The left part line represents the beginning of the transformation and the right part line represents the conclusion of the transformation. The TTT chart also explains the need of quenching the specimens after an hour of cooling due to after certain time the specimens does not require any more transformation. The martensite structure which is one of the hardest of all phases is obtained upon quenching instantly to a low temperature. But the other samples that quenched were temperd again to move higher up in the TTT chart where less hardened materials are . To obtained a desired phase it is neccsary to for rapid change in temperature with respect to time when quenching the 1045 steel to reach a Bainite phase. The specimens that were furnace cooled and cooled at room temperature are most likely to fall in the pearlite phase where the one cooled at room temperature is said to be fine pearlite while the other one is more close to coarse pearlite due to slow cooling process. The specimens tempered at 540°C falls between pearlite and bainite phases. The specimens tempered at 430°C and 315°C fall under the Bainite phase, the one tempered at a lower temperature could be classified as being of finer Bainite. Figure 5 The TTT (Time, Temperature, Transformation) chart for 1045 steel. Microstructure and hardness are closely correlated; microstructure consists of grain size and crystal structure. When the specimens were reached at austenite phase, the grains are more uniform and homogeneously distributed; upon completion of this process the specimens are ready to be cooled in order to obtain different hardeneability in the material. During instant quenching of the specimens the specimens with evenly distributed grains are not given a chance to form and are then solidified giving the material a fine grain structure in contrast
  • 14. to a material slowly cooling which gives a material more coarse grains making the material less hard and more ductile. The Jominy test results illustrated in Figure 3 prove that how cooling rate affects hardness data obtained on the attempt of experiment. The greater distance of quenching the less hard the material is because, as mentioned before, the grains are given more time to form, and the bigger the grains the less hard the material. The inconsistency among results obtained instead of constantly moving downward may have caused due to experimental errors such as not placing it fast enough on the Jominy tester. The graph line obtained by the 4143steel and 1045 steel quickly goes up and down not opening the water enough for quenching during the Jominy test. The overall graph is also does not matches to the expected results where 1045 steel graph must lower than the graph line obtained by the 4061 steel rod specimen is considered to be an experimental error of not transporting the specimen on the tester with in time duration. Table 4 The Jominy test results obtained on two steel rods. Distance from quenched end (in) 1045 Steel 4143 Steel 0.0625 75.9 66.2 0.125 72.2 66.4 0.1875 61.7 66.5 0.25 50.3 68.5
  • 17. 3.25 38.6 45.1 3.5 40.1 22.9 3.75 42.7 32 4 36.4 26.3 Figure 3 Plot showing Hardness as a function of distance from the quenched end for 1045 steel and 4061 steel specimens. The dash line is the Steel 4061 and the solid line is the Steel 1045. Conclusion Materials that cool at slower cooling rates tend to be softer materials while those that are cooled at faster cooling rates tend to be harder. Tempering a material lowers its ultimate strength but increases the amount of stress the material can absorb (toughness), higher the tempering temperature the lower the ultimate strength. Tempering also adds more ductile characteristics to the material. High hardness in materials only can be attain when there is a low toughness, in order to acquire toughness in a material that has been quenched, The tempering of the specimens is then processed to improve the toughness in the material and lower the brittleness.Fine grain structures tend to be hard material where as materials with coarse grain structure has more ductile properties. Furthermore, the data does not accurately show what should be happening. The data I collected has error that is obviously shows in my graph. The graph should show a straight line going down similar to the one
  • 18. in experiment 6. For example, after heating the Steel and quenched it the group had to measured it and probably by mistake the engineer student measured the same point twice or took similar points close to each other. Also, maybe the time it took to move the Steel from furnace to be quenched was too long which effected the measurements. Moreover, the water that was used to quench could have been too strong hitting the specimen, which leads to make a huge differences in measurements. References D. Callister Jr, Fundamentals of Materials Science and Engineering, J. Wiley & Sons, NY, 3rd Ed. 2008, Flinn and Trojan, Engineering Materials and Their Application, Chapter 6 Dieter, Mechanical Metallurgy ASM Handbook on Heat Treatment, Vol. 2 http://www.smt.sandvik.com/en/products/strip-steel-and-strip- based-products/strip-products/knife-steel/hardening- guide/purpose-of-hardening-and-tempering/ http://www.carbidedepot.com/formulas-hardness.htm William D. Callister, Jr., David G. Rethwisch. Fundamentals of materials science and engineering, third edition www.csun.edu/~bavarian/Courses/MSE%20227/Labs/2- Charpy_test.pdf Distance From Quenching (in) vs. Hardness (HRA) 1045 Steel 0.0625 0.125 0.1875 0.25 0.3125 0.375 0.4375 0.5 0.5625 0.625 0.6875 0.75 0.8125 0.875 0.9375 1.0 1.125 1.25 1.375 1.5 1.625 1.75 1.875 2.0 2.25 2.5 2.75 3.0 3.25 3.5 3.75 4.0 75.9 72.2 61.7 50.3 58.2 56.9 55.6 55.9 53.6 55.7 54.4 49.7 51.8 51.2 51.6 50.2
  • 19. 49.2 50.8 50.5 48.4 49.2 49.1 47.8 47.2 47.3 47.5 46.9 44.2 38.6 40.1 42.7 36.4 4061 Steel 0.0625 0.125 0.1875 0.25 0.3125 0.375 0.4375 0.5 0.5625 0.625 0.6875 0.75 0.8125 0.875 0.9375 1.0 1.125 1.25 1.375 1.5 1.625 1.75 1.875 2.0 2.25 2.5 2.75 3.0 3.25 3.5 3.75 4.0 66.2 66.4 66.5 68.5 67.6 61.3 65.1 60.8 60.6 61.4 57.8 58.2 53.8 55.9 51.9 56.6 52.3 55.0 53.5 51.8 49.8 51.9 52.0 47.7 49.7 49.7 45.5 45.8 45.1 22.9 32.0 26.3 Distance From Quenching (in) Hardness (HRA) Brinell Hardness (krg) vs. Rockwell A Hardness (hra) BHN vs. Rockwell A 601.0 444.0 417.0 363.0 197.0 179.0 76.99 69.19 70.89 71.58 53.39 53.05 Brinell Hardness (krg) Hardness (Rockwell A scale) hra Rockwell A Hardness vs. Tempering Temperature 540.0 315.0 71.58 70.89 Tempering Temperature (C) Hardness (Rockwell A scale) Laboratory Experiment. Number 6 & 7 Heat Treatment and Hardenability of Steels Submitted to fulfill the requirements of MSE 227/L T 7-9:50 College of Engineering and Computer Science Manufacturing Systems Engineering and Management April 2, 2013 Laboratory Experiment No. 6 & 7 Heat Treatment and Hardenability of Steels Abstract This experiment is attempted to measure the hardenability of the steel and understand the process of heat treatment of different materials at different cooling strategies. Cooling through
  • 20. different procedures will cause the materials to have different properties and different microstructures. Furthermore next stage of experiment relates the cooling rate and hardness of 1045 steel and 4143 steel. This also helps in determine how alloying a material permits it to be heat treated more homogeneously. Investigated results also proven to be close enough to expected results in obtaining higher brittleness with rapid cooling in and to improve ductility the process of tempering is proven to be very efficient with increase of tempering temperature the hardness of material must be decrease. Last but not least, after finishing experiment 6 the group found out that the lower the tempering temperature the lower the hardness. Also, the results that the group found from experiment 7 after finishing it proved being inconsistent from what it should be. Introduction The purpose of this experiment is to determine what effect heat treating and then cooling has on the hardness and grain structure of two different types of steel. The two different types of steels were utilized are 1045 steel samples and 4143 steel sample which is considered to be a low-alloy steel. The heat-treating process is a method to alter physical and mechanical properties of the material. The heat-treating process is consists of three crucial steps of annealing, hardening, and tempering. Annealing is primarily used to soften and to induce the ductility of the specimens by heating and holding at suitable temperature and then cooling, by instantly quenching in the water, which produces the higher brittleness with low ductility and toughness in the specimens. Moreover, tempering is a process of heat-treating, which is used to increase the toughness of metal. Tempering is important because it used to achieve desired hardness. To restore some the toughness and impact properties is obtained by tempering where specimens are reheated to a temperature between 5000 F and 10000 F for certain time which removes the internal strain caused by sudden cooling in the quenching bath without a large decrease in hardness or strength.
  • 21. In attempting the first phase of the experiment it cannot determined why some heat-treated materials don’t reach a high hardness when cooled at certain temperature. With the hardness test the hardness of a material can be determined. The Hardenability is a property that determines the depth and distribution of hardness when steel is heated to a given temperature and then quenched to reach martensitic structure, which is obtained by performing Jominy test, where an austenitized steel bar is quenched at one end only, thus producing a range of cooling rates along the bar. Procedure First of all, the experiment provided six 1045 steel specimens were for heat treating process, and for the second were only two steel rods of 1045 steel and 4143 steel respectively used to perform the Jominy test. In order to go though the details read the following: First the group begin with identifying all each specimen by punching different letter on to them using hammer. Second, the engineer students heated all specimens at 16000 F for 1/2 hour after obtaining the Rockwell a scale hardness measurement. Third, The four samples were quenched in water, one sample is allowed for air cool, and the other sample is set for furnace cool for one hour and quenched in water. Then, the two steel rods of different properties also allowed for heated at 16000 F for 45 minutes after obtaining the Rockwell scale hardness measurements. Also, the group measured the Rockwell a scale hardness on all six quenched specimens after being heat treated and tempered the three-quenched specimen at different temperature of 6000 F, 8000 F, and 10000 F respectively for 30 minutes. After tempering specimens then quenched in water. Moreover, obtained hardness measurements using Brinell (3000 kg) and Rockwell A scale on all six steel specimens. In order to perform the Jominy test one steel rod is then removed from the furnace and is placed in the cooling tower for 10 minutes before quenching in water, repeated the same procedure for other steel rod. Finally, measured the hardness 1/16 inch for the first inch and every 1/8 for the next inch and 1/4 for the next 2 inches
  • 22. using Rockwell a scale for both steel rods. Results and Discussions The experiments “Heat Treatment of Steel” and “Hardenability of Steel” are two different experiments, which show the effects of heat-treating, and quenching of specimen provides different hardness and microstructure in the materials. During first phase of experiment the two specimens are left to cool at room temperature and furnace temperature, these specimens were quenched after an hour. The reason for this quenching after an hour is due to the fact that the grains in the material are given a chance to form when cooling at room temperature and furnace cooling temperature. If the grains are not given enough time to form when cooling at room and oven temperature the grain structure would not be accurate as if actually air cooled and furnace cooled. From the Table 1 it can be clearly seen the hardness obtained through furnace cooled is lesser than hardness obtained by air cooled specimens because in furnace cooling allow the grains to from due to its slow cooling process where as during air cool specimens tends to cool much quicker compare to furnace cool and specimens have less time to form grains. Due to that specimens will have more boundaries, which mean there will be more interference with dislocation motion. Also, in Table 1 it shows the Rockwell measurement is 76.99 for the instant quench. On the other hand, the furnace cooled is 55.05. Moreover, in Table 2 represent the Ultimate Tensile strength (psi) for all samples from the average Brinell Hardness number obtained. In fact, the hardness of both of the measured BNH and the measured Rockwell are decreasing. The Ultimate Tensile Strength (psi) is also decreasing because the hardness is going down. As we know the harder a material is the higher the strength is. Furthermore, the instant quenched sample has the highest hardness and the Ultimate Tensile strength results. Finally, Table 3 represents the hardness of the Steel 1045 sample after it has been placed at different tempering temperatures. Moreover, Table 4 shows the difference in hardness between Steel 1045 and Steel 4143 that that was taken
  • 23. at different distance from the quenched end. Table 1 Comparison between performed Brinell hardness numbers measurements with Brinell hardness numbers obtained by conversion of Rockwell A scale measurements. Specimens Rockwell A scale measurements RHA Conversion to BHN Dimple Diameters (mm) BHN from Dimple Diameters S instant quench 76.99 500 2.50 601 H Tempered @540 0C 71.58 390 3.20 363 D Tempered @ 430 0C 69.19 353 2.90 444 K Tempered @ 315 0C 70.89 381 2.81 417 M (air cooled) 53.39 172 4.29
  • 24. 197 E (Furnace cooled) 53.05 169 4.51 179 Table 2 Computed Ultimate Tensile strength (psi) based on the average Brinell Hardness number obtained. Specimens Measured BHN (3000)kg Measured Rockwell A scale numbers (HRA ) Conversion BHN Average BHN Ultimate Tensile Strength (psi) S 401 75.53 500 550.5 2.75E+05 D 429 71.71 353 398.5 1.99E+05 K 444 66.89 381 399 2.00E+05 H
  • 25. 388 66.99 390 376.5 1.88E+05 M 211 55.92 172 184.5 9.23E+04 E 363 52.10 169 174 8.70E+04 The obtained Brinell hardness comparing to Brinell hardness obtained from the conversion scale of Rockwell A scale hardness both results increase and decrease accordingly to the hardness. The data represented in Table 1 and Figure 1 shows that Brinell hardness increase in relation to the cooling rate and heat treating hardness for Rockwell A scale hardness measurements, but did not increase between specimens “K” and “D” instead hardness went down. If both the Brinell hardness and Rockwell a numbers were proportional to each other a straight line would be seen. A graph like the one shown in Figure 1 could be a result of an inaccurate machine or inaccurate measurement taking strategies. Figure 1 Brinell Hardness numbers vs. Rockwell A scale numbers obtained after heat treating of the specimens. Table 3 The hardness measurements obtained using Rockwell A scale for three 1045 steel specimens that has been tempered at
  • 26. different temperatures after being heat treated. Specimens Hardness Rockwell A scale (HRA) Tempering temperature ( c ) D 71.71 430 K 66.89 315 H 66.99 540 Figure 2 Hardness obtained using Rockwell A scale hardness after tempering the specimens. To obtain desired mechanical properties in steel specimens it is necessary to process heat treating, quenching, and tempering of the steel. Hardening is way of making steel harder, by first heat treating the specimens to 8850 C for half hour and immediately cools it by quenching the specimens in water, which increase the brittleness of the substance at much higher rate with very low ductility and toughness in the samples. The tempering is the process through which brittleness is reduced to improve ductility and toughness by heating the specimens at different temperature for certain time. Higher tempering temperature will yield a somewhat softer material with higher toughness, whereas a lower tempering temperature will produce a harder and somewhat more brittle material, as shown by the Figure 2 where hardness increases with the increase of tempering temperature. The possible errors of not quenching the specimens in desired time or factors of obtaining the hardness of the samples at softer spot may have occurred in processing the tempering of
  • 27. specimens, which resulted on the graphs for not obtaining consistency. The decline in hardness of tempered specimens once has been heat treated and quenched in Table 3 proves the hypothesis of decrease in brittleness by tempering the specimens. The Ultimate tensile strength of materials is determined using equation 1 by using data collected for Brinell hardness for all the specimens mentioned in Table 2. Equation 1 Calculating the Ultimate Tensile Strength of materials. In determining the strength, obtaining the hardness is great ways of making comparison, which can be attain using Rockwell A scale and Brinell hardness scale which is directly proportional to the tensile strength. In using Brinell hardness scale timing in maintaining the load on the specimens may have been a factor of slight variation of results where as in Rockwell A scale ha From the Figure 4 the amount of carbide ((Fe3C) can be calculated at temperature 1338 0F for 1045 steel using equation 2 where C1 is 45% because that is the weight percent of carbon in 1045 steel. Ca and Cb calculated using the lever rule which consists of drawing a line across to determine how much weight percent of material there is in the steel, where “a” is alpha and “b” is Iron Carbide (Fe3C). Using equation 2 is determined that Iron carbide percent is about 0.68% and 99.32% is presumed to be alpha phase. Wb = (C1 – Ca)/(Cb – Ca) , Ca= 2.2%, and Cb= 65% are the weight percent composition. Equation 2 To find the Fe3C (carbide) content using weight percent equation. Figure 4 The iron-iron carbide phase diagram. Different microstructures obtained when specimens processed through differen cooling strategies that is why the TTT (Time,
  • 28. Temperature, Transformation) chart in Figure 5 is proven to be great tool in determining the microstructure. The TTT chart shows the amount of time needed to quench a material to reach a certain phase. The left part line represents the beginning of the transformation and the right part line represents the conclusion of the transformation. The TTT chart also explains the need of quenching the specimens after an hour of cooling due to after certain time the specimens does not require any more transformation. The martensite structure which is one of the hardest of all phases is obtained upon quenching instantly to a low temperature. But the other samples that quenched were temperd again to move higher up in the TTT chart where less hardened materials are . To obtained a desired phase it is neccsary to for rapid change in temperature with respect to time when quenching the 1045 steel to reach a Bainite phase. The specimens that were furnace cooled and cooled at room temperature are most likely to fall in the pearlite phase where the one cooled at room temperature is said to be fine pearlite while the other one is more close to coarse pearlite due to slow cooling process. The specimens tempered at 540°C falls between pearlite and bainite phases. The specimens tempered at 430°C and 315°C fall under the Bainite phase, the one tempered at a lower temperature could be classified as being of finer Bainite. Figure 5 The TTT (Time, Temperature, Transformation) chart for 1045 steel. Microstructure and hardness are closely correlated; microstructure consists of grain size and crystal structure. When the specimens were reached at austenite phase, the grains are more uniform and homogeneously distributed; upon completion of this process the specimens are ready to be cooled in order to obtain different hardeneability in the material. During instant quenching of the specimens the specimens with evenly distributed grains are not given a chance to form and are then solidified giving the material a fine grain structure in contrast to a material slowly cooling which gives a material more coarse
  • 29. grains making the material less hard and more ductile. The Jominy test results illustrated in Figure 3 prove that how cooling rate affects hardness data obtained on the attempt of experiment. The greater distance of quenching the less hard the material is because, as mentioned before, the grains are given more time to form, and the bigger the grains the less hard the material. The inconsistency among results obtained instead of constantly moving downward may have caused due to experimental errors such as not placing it fast enough on the Jominy tester. The graph line obtained by the 4143steel and 1045 steel quickly goes up and down not opening the water enough for quenching during the Jominy test. The overall graph is also does not matches to the expected results where 1045 steel graph must lower than the graph line obtained by the 4061 steel rod specimen is considered to be an experimental error of not transporting the specimen on the tester with in time duration. Table 4 The Jominy test results obtained on two steel rods. Distance from quenched end (in) 1045 Steel 4143 Steel 0.0625 75.9 66.2 0.125 72.2 66.4 0.1875 61.7 66.5 0.25 50.3 68.5 0.3125
  • 32. 38.6 45.1 3.5 40.1 22.9 3.75 42.7 32 4 36.4 26.3 Figure 3 Plot showing Hardness as a function of distance from the quenched end for 1045 steel and 4061 steel specimens. The dash line is the Steel 4061 and the solid line is the Steel 1045. Conclusion Materials that cool at slower cooling rates tend to be softer materials while those that are cooled at faster cooling rates tend to be harder. Tempering a material lowers its ultimate strength but increases the amount of stress the material can absorb (toughness), higher the tempering temperature the lower the ultimate strength. Tempering also adds more ductile characteristics to the material. High hardness in materials only can be attain when there is a low toughness, in order to acquire toughness in a material that has been quenched, The tempering of the specimens is then processed to improve the toughness in the material and lower the brittleness.Fine grain structures tend to be hard material where as materials with coarse grain structure has more ductile properties. Furthermore, the data does not accurately show what should be happening. The data I collected has error that is obviously shows in my graph. The graph should show a straight line going down similar to the one in experiment 6. For example, after heating the Steel and
  • 33. quenched it the group had to measured it and probably by mistake the engineer student measured the same point twice or took similar points close to each other. Also, maybe the time it took to move the Steel from furnace to be quenched was too long which effected the measurements. Moreover, the water that was used to quench could have been too strong hitting the specimen, which leads to make a huge differences in measurements. References D. Callister Jr, Fundamentals of Materials Science and Engineering, J. Wiley & Sons, NY, 3rd Ed. 2008, Flinn and Trojan, Engineering Materials and Their Application, Chapter 6 Dieter, Mechanical Metallurgy ASM Handbook on Heat Treatment, Vol. 2 http://www.smt.sandvik.com/en/products/strip-steel-and-strip- based-products/strip-products/knife-steel/hardening- guide/purpose-of-hardening-and-tempering/ http://www.carbidedepot.com/formulas-hardness.htm William D. Callister, Jr., David G. Rethwisch. Fundamentals of materials science and engineering, third edition www.csun.edu/~bavarian/Courses/MSE%20227/Labs/2- Charpy_test.pdf Brinell Hardness (krg) vs. Rockwell A Hardness (hra) BHN vs. Rockwell A 601 444 417 363 197 179 76.989999999999995 69.19 70.89 71.58 53.39 53.05 Brinell Hardness (krg) Hardness (Rockwell A scale) hra Rockwell A Hardness vs. Tempering Temperature 540 315
  • 34. 71.58 70.89 Tempering Temperature (C) Hardness (Rockwell A scale) Distance From Quenching (in) vs. Hardness (HRA) 1045 Steel 6.25E-2 0.125 0.1875 0.25 0.3125 0.375 0.4375 0.5 0.5625 0.625 0.6875 0.75 0.8125 0.875 0.9375 1 1.125 1.25 1.375 1.5 1.625 1.75 1.875 2 2.25 2.5 2.75 3 3.25 3.5 3.75 4 75.900000000000006 72.2 61.7 50.3 58.2 56.9 55.6 55.9 53.6 55.7 54.4 49.7 51.8 51.2 51.6 50.2 49.2 50.8 50.5 48.4 49.2 49.1 47.8 47.2 47.3 47.5 46.9 44.2 38.6 40.1 42.7 36.4 4061 Steel 6.25E-2 0.125 0.1875 0.25 0.3125 0.375 0.4375 0.5 0.5625 0.625 0.6875 0.75 0.8125 0.875 0.9375 1 1.125 1.25 1.375 1.5 1.625 1.75 1.875 2 2.25 2.5 2.75 3 3.25 3.5 3.75 4 66.2 66.400000000000006 66.5 68.5 67.599999999999994 61.3 65.099999999999994 60.8 60.6 61.4 57.8 58.2 53.8 55.9 51.9 56.6 52.3 55 53.5 51.8 49.8 51.9 52 47.7 49.7 49.7 45.5 45.8 45.1 22.9 32 26.3 Distance From Quenching (in) Hardness (HRA)