This document provides assessment criteria and feedback for a task analyzing a TV crime drama. It includes 16 marks across several categories: use of binary opposites, relevant locations, detailed mise-en-scene, appropriateness for audience, reference to Todorov, title relating to characters and mood, clear genre/sub-genre, use of terminology, clear character types, and realistic scheduling. The feedback distinguishes between a C and A grade response, noting what was good and could be improved for storyboarding, including progression, genre, integration of text, camera movement, creating enigma, thoughtful action, and stimulus.

1. TV Crime Drama
– Assessment
Task 02
Feedback
Total of 16 Marks
• Explicit use of binary opposite (2 marks) Grade Boundaries
17 – 16 A*
•Locations relevant to genre (2 marks) 13 – 15 A
10 – 12 B
• Detailed mise-en-scene (2 marks) 7–9 C
3–6 D
2–1 E
• Appropriate for audience; Bulmer & Katz (2 Marks) 0 U
•Referenceto Todorov (2 Marks)
Read the answer and highlight where the
• Title relates to characters and mood (1 Marks) response would score a mark.
What grade does it get? Why?
• Clear genre / sub-genre (1 Marks)
• Terminology used throughout e.g. connotation (1Marks) Highlight the areas on the mark scheme where
you need to improve your Task 02
What two areas are you going to improve
• Clear TV Crime character types (1 Marks) this lesson?
• Realistic scheduling (1 Mark) 1.
• Setting clear and relevant setting (1 Mark)
• Realistic scheduling (1 Mark) 2.

2. Storyboarding Feedback
C Grade A Grade
• Every shot complete • Sense of progression
• Annotations correct (LS/MS/CU) • Sense of genre
• Sound considered • Clever integration of text
• Title sequence conventions • Camera movement
used • Enigma created
• Thoughtful action

3. Today
Work on your IDEA
TASK 2
Work on your storyboard
TASK 4

4. Storyboarding
Stimulus

5. Storyboard: Feedback
What was good… TV Crime Genre
1. Audience Appeal
Character
2. Setting
Even better if…
-
Video Essay of the Wire title Sequence