The document discusses various topics related to assessment, scoring, and evaluation. It defines key terms and describes different types of assessments including formative and summative, formal and informal, traditional and alternative. It also covers criterion-referenced and norm-referenced evaluation, and assessing scientific process skills. The document provides details on developing and implementing various assessment strategies and techniques.
Applied Psych Test Design: Part D--Develop norm (standardization) planKevin McGrew
The Art and Science of Applied Test Development. This is the fourth in a series of PPT modules explicating the development of psychological tests in the domain of cognitive ability using contemporary methods (e.g., theory-driven test specification; IRT-Rasch scaling; etc.). The presentations are intended to be conceptual and not statistical in nature. Feedback is appreciated.
Applied Psych Test Design: Part C - Use of Rasch scaling technologyKevin McGrew
The Art and Science of Applied Test Development. This is the third in a series of PPT modules explicating the development of psychological tests in the domain of cognitive ability using contemporary methods (e.g., theory-driven test specification; IRT-Rasch scaling; etc.). The presentations are intended to be conceptual and not statistical in nature. Feedback is appreciated.
Blueprinting: deciding what to measure, Liz Norman 2014Liz Norman
Blueprinting: deciding what to measure, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences Teaching and Learning Workshop, July 3, 2014, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Applied Psych Test Design: Part A--Planning, development frameworks & domain/...Kevin McGrew
The Art and Science of Applied Test Development. This is the first in a series of PPT modules explicating the development of psychological tests in the domain of cognitive ability using contemporary methods (e.g., theory-driven test specification; IRT-Rasch scaling; etc.). The presentations are intended to be conceptual and not statistical in nature. Feedback is appreciated.
Presented August 16, 2012 - Part of 2012 Collaborative Mentoring Webinar Series
Education Northwest/National Mentoring Center, Friends For Youth, Indiana Mentoring Partnership, Kansas Mentors, Mass Mentoring Partnership, Mentoring Partnership of Minnesota, Mentor Michigan, Mobius Mentors, Oregon Mentors and other partners are working together in 2012 to deliver this free monthly webinar series for mentoring professionals.
For updates about upcoming webinars, join and follow the Mentoring Forums at http://mentoringforums.educationnorthwest.org.
Applied Psych Test Design: Part D--Develop norm (standardization) planKevin McGrew
The Art and Science of Applied Test Development. This is the fourth in a series of PPT modules explicating the development of psychological tests in the domain of cognitive ability using contemporary methods (e.g., theory-driven test specification; IRT-Rasch scaling; etc.). The presentations are intended to be conceptual and not statistical in nature. Feedback is appreciated.
Applied Psych Test Design: Part C - Use of Rasch scaling technologyKevin McGrew
The Art and Science of Applied Test Development. This is the third in a series of PPT modules explicating the development of psychological tests in the domain of cognitive ability using contemporary methods (e.g., theory-driven test specification; IRT-Rasch scaling; etc.). The presentations are intended to be conceptual and not statistical in nature. Feedback is appreciated.
Blueprinting: deciding what to measure, Liz Norman 2014Liz Norman
Blueprinting: deciding what to measure, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences Teaching and Learning Workshop, July 3, 2014, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Applied Psych Test Design: Part A--Planning, development frameworks & domain/...Kevin McGrew
The Art and Science of Applied Test Development. This is the first in a series of PPT modules explicating the development of psychological tests in the domain of cognitive ability using contemporary methods (e.g., theory-driven test specification; IRT-Rasch scaling; etc.). The presentations are intended to be conceptual and not statistical in nature. Feedback is appreciated.
Presented August 16, 2012 - Part of 2012 Collaborative Mentoring Webinar Series
Education Northwest/National Mentoring Center, Friends For Youth, Indiana Mentoring Partnership, Kansas Mentors, Mass Mentoring Partnership, Mentoring Partnership of Minnesota, Mentor Michigan, Mobius Mentors, Oregon Mentors and other partners are working together in 2012 to deliver this free monthly webinar series for mentoring professionals.
For updates about upcoming webinars, join and follow the Mentoring Forums at http://mentoringforums.educationnorthwest.org.
Reflecting On Assessment A Tale Of Hope And Ideals 2010John McCarthy
Eliminating Grade Fog
How do we know what students know or don't know? If the primary purpose of grades is giving academic data on a student's learning progress. The challenge is to use a grading process that tells a clear picture of learning, unfogged by non-academic factors.
http://wb4all.blogspot.com
Reflecting On Assessment A Tale Of Hope And Ideals 2010John McCarthy
Eliminating Grade Fog
How do we know what students know or don't know? If the primary purpose of grades is giving academic data on a student's learning progress. The challenge is to use a grading process that tells a clear picture of learning, unfogged by non-academic factors.
http://wb4all.blogspot.com
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
2. DefinitionsDefinitions
AssessmentAssessment ---- The process of measuringThe process of measuring
something with the purpose of assigning asomething with the purpose of assigning a
numerical value.numerical value.
ScoringScoring ---- The procedure of assigning aThe procedure of assigning a
numerical value to assessment task.numerical value to assessment task.
EvaluationEvaluation ---- The process of determiningThe process of determining
the worth of something in relation tothe worth of something in relation to
established benchmarks usingestablished benchmarks using
assessment information.assessment information.
3. Assessment TypesAssessment Types
FormativeFormative - for- for
performanceperformance
enhancementenhancement
FormalFormal - quizzes,- quizzes,
tests, essays, labtests, essays, lab
reports, etc.reports, etc.
TraditionalTraditional - tests,- tests,
quizzes, homework ,quizzes, homework ,
lab reports, teacherlab reports, teacher
SummativeSummative - for- for
performanceperformance
assessmentassessment
InformalInformal - active- active
questioning during andquestioning during and
at end of classat end of class
AlternativeAlternative - PBL’s,- PBL’s,
presentations, essays,presentations, essays,
book reviews, peersbook reviews, peers
4. Alternative AssessmentAlternative Assessment
Alternative to what? Paper & pencil examsAlternative to what? Paper & pencil exams
Alternatives:Alternatives:
lab work / research projectslab work / research projects
portfoliosportfolios
presentationspresentations
research papersresearch papers
essaysessays
self-assessment / peer assessmentself-assessment / peer assessment
lab practicallab practical
classroom “clickers” or responder padsclassroom “clickers” or responder pads
5. More Formal AlternativesMore Formal Alternatives
Rube Goldberg projectsRube Goldberg projects
bridge building / rocketry / mousetrap carsbridge building / rocketry / mousetrap cars
writing a computer programwriting a computer program
research projectresearch project
term paperterm paper
create web pagecreate web page
create moviecreate movie
role playingrole playing
building modelsbuilding models
academic competitionsacademic competitions
6. Informal CATsInformal CATs (Classroom Assessment Techniques)(Classroom Assessment Techniques)
Quick-fire questionsQuick-fire questions
Minute paperMinute paper
1) What did you learn today?1) What did you learn today?
2) What questions do you have?2) What questions do you have?
Directed paraphrasing (explain a concept to aDirected paraphrasing (explain a concept to a
particular audience)particular audience)
The “muddiest” point (What is it about the topicThe “muddiest” point (What is it about the topic
that remains unclear to you?)that remains unclear to you?)
For additional ideas, see Angelo, T.A. & Cross, P.K. (1993)For additional ideas, see Angelo, T.A. & Cross, P.K. (1993) ClassroomClassroom
Assessment TechniquesAssessment Techniques (2nd ed) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.(2nd ed) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Authentic AssessmentAuthentic Assessment
The National Science EducationThe National Science Education
Standards draft (1994) states, "AuthenticStandards draft (1994) states, "Authentic
assessment exercises require students toassessment exercises require students to
apply scientific information and reasoningapply scientific information and reasoning
to situations like those they will encounterto situations like those they will encounter
in the world outside the classroom as wellin the world outside the classroom as well
as situations that approximate howas situations that approximate how
scientists do their work."scientists do their work."
8. Assessment ConcernsAssessment Concerns
ValidityValidity -- Is the test assessing what’s intended?-- Is the test assessing what’s intended?
Are test items based on stated objectives?Are test items based on stated objectives?
Are test items properly constructed?Are test items properly constructed?
DifficultyDifficulty -- Are questions too easy or too hard?-- Are questions too easy or too hard?
(e.g., 30% to 70% of students should answer a(e.g., 30% to 70% of students should answer a
given item correctly)given item correctly)
DiscriminabilityDiscriminability -- Are the performance on-- Are the performance on
individual test items positively correlated withindividual test items positively correlated with
overall student performances? (e.g., only bestoverall student performances? (e.g., only best
students do well on most difficult questions)students do well on most difficult questions)
9. Evaluation TypesEvaluation Types
Criterion-referenced evaluationCriterion-referenced evaluation -- student-- student
performance is assessed against a set ofperformance is assessed against a set of
predetermined standardspredetermined standards
Norm-referenced evaluationNorm-referenced evaluation -- student-- student
performance is assessed relative to theperformance is assessed relative to the
other studentsother students
The “curve”The “curve” -- sometimes a combination of-- sometimes a combination of
criterion- and norm-referenced processescriterion- and norm-referenced processes
10. Criterion-Referenced Eval’sCriterion-Referenced Eval’s
Based on a predetermined set of criteria.Based on a predetermined set of criteria.
For instance,For instance,
90% and up = A90% and up = A
80% to 89.99% = B80% to 89.99% = B
70% to 79.99% = C70% to 79.99% = C
60% to 69.99% = D60% to 69.99% = D
59.99% and below = F59.99% and below = F
11. Criterion-Referenced Eval’sCriterion-Referenced Eval’s
Pros:Pros:
Sets minimumSets minimum
performanceperformance
expectations.expectations.
Demonstrate whatDemonstrate what
students can andstudents can and
cannot do in relation tocannot do in relation to
important content-areaimportant content-area
standards (e.g, ILS).standards (e.g, ILS).
Cons:Cons:
Some times it’s hard toSome times it’s hard to
know just where to setknow just where to set
boundary conditions.boundary conditions.
Lack of comparisonLack of comparison
data with otherdata with other
students and/orstudents and/or
schools.schools.
12. Norm-referenced EvaluationNorm-referenced Evaluation
Based upon the assumption of a standardBased upon the assumption of a standard
normal (Gaussian) distribution with n > 30.normal (Gaussian) distribution with n > 30.
Employs theEmploys the z score:score:
AA = top 10% (= top 10% (z > +1.28)> +1.28)
BB = next 20% (+0.53 <= next 20% (+0.53 < z < +1.28)< +1.28)
CC = central 40% (-0.53 <= central 40% (-0.53 < z < +0.53)< +0.53)
DD = next 20% (-1.28 <= next 20% (-1.28 < z < -0.53)< -0.53)
FF = bottom 10% (= bottom 10% (z < -1.28)< -1.28)
z =
X −X
σ
13. Norm-referenced EvaluationNorm-referenced Evaluation
Pros:Pros:
Ensures a “spread”Ensures a “spread”
between top andbetween top and
bottom of the class forbottom of the class for
clear grade setting.clear grade setting.
Shows studentShows student
performance relativeperformance relative
to group.to group.
Con:Con: In a group withIn a group with
great performance,great performance,
some will be ensuredsome will be ensured
an “F.”an “F.”
Cons:Cons:
Top and bottomTop and bottom
performances canperformances can
sometimes be verysometimes be very
close.close.
Dispenses withDispenses with
absolute criteria forabsolute criteria for
performance.performance.
Being above averageBeing above average
does not necessarilydoes not necessarily
imply “A” performance.imply “A” performance.
14. Norm and Criterion ComparedNorm and Criterion Compared
Norm-Referenced:Norm-Referenced:
Ensures a competitiveEnsures a competitive
classroom atmosphereclassroom atmosphere
Assumes a standardAssumes a standard
normal distributionnormal distribution
Small-group statisticsSmall-group statistics
a problema problem
Assumes “this” classAssumes “this” class
like all otherslike all others
Criterion-Referenced:Criterion-Referenced:
Allows for a cooperativeAllows for a cooperative
classroom atmosphereclassroom atmosphere
No assumptions aboutNo assumptions about
form of distributionform of distribution
Small-group statisticsSmall-group statistics
not a problemnot a problem
Difficult to know justDifficult to know just
where to set criteriawhere to set criteria
15. The “Curve”The “Curve”
The “curve” might represent a mixture ofThe “curve” might represent a mixture of
norm- and criterion-referenced grading.norm- and criterion-referenced grading.
The “curve” is a highly subjective process.The “curve” is a highly subjective process.
The “curve” is normally applied only at theThe “curve” is normally applied only at the
end of a term.end of a term.
16. Assessing ScientificAssessing Scientific
Process SkillsProcess Skills
Scientific Process Skills (intellectual skillsScientific Process Skills (intellectual skills
closely associated with inquiry learning)closely associated with inquiry learning)
18. Integrated ScientificIntegrated Scientific
Process SkillsProcess Skills
Identifying variablesIdentifying variables
Constructing a table of dataConstructing a table of data
Constructing a graphConstructing a graph
Describing a relationship between variablesDescribing a relationship between variables
Acquiring and processing dataAcquiring and processing data
Analyzing investigationsAnalyzing investigations
Constructing hypothesesConstructing hypotheses
Defining variables operationallyDefining variables operationally
Designing investigationsDesigning investigations
ExperimentingExperimenting
19. Enhanced ScientificEnhanced Scientific
Process SkillsProcess Skills
Solving complex, real-world problems
Establishing empirical laws
Synthesizing theoretical explanations
Analyzing and evaluating scientific arguments
Constructing logical proofs
Generating principles through the process of
induction
Generating predictions through the process of
deduction
20. Miscellaneous CommentsMiscellaneous Comments
Study guides can be created to set objectives.
Prepare tests from objectives.
Assess broad spectrum: content AND skills.
Make a rubric for questions that do not have
forced-choice answers.
Create an answer key for forced-choice
questions.
Double-check your answer key.
Grade ASAP, providing corrective feedback.
21. Handling AppealsHandling Appeals
Encourage students to learn from their mistakes.Encourage students to learn from their mistakes.
Accept appeals in writing, due by a certain date.Accept appeals in writing, due by a certain date.
Refuse to discuss question if student will beRefuse to discuss question if student will be
appealing the answer.appealing the answer.
Appeals include the following:Appeals include the following:
Question being appealedQuestion being appealed
Teacher and student responsesTeacher and student responses
Explanation of why student’s response is as good as or betterExplanation of why student’s response is as good as or better
than teacher’s expected response.than teacher’s expected response.
Teacher responds in writing.Teacher responds in writing.
No class-wide correction: each student must make own appeal.No class-wide correction: each student must make own appeal.
Benefit: students feel they are treated fairly.Benefit: students feel they are treated fairly.
22. Portfolios of Student WorkPortfolios of Student Work
Have students prepare an ongoing,Have students prepare an ongoing,
extensive portfolio of their work.extensive portfolio of their work.
Maintain these portfolios in an open butMaintain these portfolios in an open but
supervised setting.supervised setting.
During parent-teacher conferences, haveDuring parent-teacher conferences, have
student in attendance and have parentsstudent in attendance and have parents
go through portfolio with student under thego through portfolio with student under the
watchful eyes of the teacher.watchful eyes of the teacher.
23. Record KeepingRecord Keeping
Keep copies of your grade book orKeep copies of your grade book or
computer program in widely separatedcomputer program in widely separated
locations.locations.
Keep up to date.Keep up to date.
Respect confidentiality laws....Respect confidentiality laws....