GROUP MEMEBERS
• SHANIKA DILRUKSHI
• SACHIN ABEYKOON
• SACHINI UDUGE
• UGEEMA DE SILVA
• SHAKTHI DISSANAYAKE
• AVISHA SENEVIRATHNE
• PIYATH GUNAWARDENA
• SINTHUJA ESWARAN
FINANCIAL CRISIS
Situation of a country’s economy when they find themselves in an
unmanageable lifestyle
Debt of a country equalizes to the income of a nation.
It causes devaluation of currencies and stock
ASIAN FINANCIAL CRISIS
 Unsustainable lifestyle was maintained in Asian markets
 Aroused in July 1997
 Also called Asian contagion
 It began and spread throughout Asia resulting currency devaluations
ASIA BEFORE FINANCIAL CRISIS
Asian countries had an extraordinary records of economic performances in 1994-1997
Asian markets went through:
 Fast economic growth,
 Low inflations,
 Strong financial positions a stability
 Increases saving rates
 Open economies
 Blooming export divisions
flourishing Asian markets did not predict any financial crisis
BEGINNING OF ASIAN FINANCIAL CRISIS
 Began from Thailand (Tom Yum Goong crisis)
 IMF (International Monetary Fund)
 Thailand Authorities was notified about the upcoming crisis by IMF
 Convincing Thailand was a failure
 IMF assumed that the Thailand were tolerable to the crisis.
 Occurred due to the shortage of foreign currency to upkeep its stable
exchange rate.
AFFECTED COUNTRIES
 All countries underwent a loss of demand and self-confidence
 But in a different degree of impact
 Highly affected countries:- Indonesia, South Korea, and Thailand.
 Moderate impact to :- Hong Kong, Malaysia and Philippines.
 Least impact to :- Japan, China, Singapore and Vietnam.
AT THE END OF ASIAN FINANCIAL CRISIS
 This crisis spread throughout the Asian markets.
 It caused:
 Collapsing currencies
 Stock market crashes
 Devalued assets
 Reduced import revenues
 Increment in private debt
ROLE OF IMF AFTER THE CRISIS
 Adopt to protective strategies to safeguard the stability of their own currency.
 Affected authorities requested help from IMF
 IMF
 provided financial assistance
 provided the biggest loans in its history.
 and the World Bank then secured the financial stability
(1)
 Low interests were provided for funds in Asia
 Investors shifted extensive amounts of foreign funds
 Asian underwent economic boom
 But there was a poor corporate control and weak investment systems
 It left the foreign capital unproductive.
(2)
 Acquired dollar-denominated debt.
 Fixed exchange rates
 pictured them an incorrect sense of safe keeping
(3)
 Exports of Asian countries were weak
 Because of the:
 Indebtedness of US dollar in compared to Yen
 Weakening value of china’s Yuan in 1994
 NAFTA following market collapses
 extensive foreign funds and wilting exports
 enlarging account deficiencies
IMPACT OF ASIAN FINANCIAL CRISIS TO DIFFERENT
COUNTRIES
THAILAND
IMPACT TO THAILAND
 Huge downsizings in financial assets, constructions and stocks
 Population was left unemployed
 600,000 foreign employees left Thailand
 75% dropped in Thai Stock market
 Thai finance companies collapsed
IMF ROLE TO THAILAND
 Provided a helping hand to Thailand
 Provided a set of loans and investments.
THAILAND AFTER THE FINANCIAL CRISIS
 Stabilized its budget
 Paid off their debt to IMF
PHILIPPINES
 Philippines Pesos (PHP) is the currency of Philippines
 PHP was devalued from 26 ₱ to 55.75 ₱ against 1 US dollar
 Later after the PHP was appreciated to 53 ₱ in 2001
 And PHP was appreciated to 41 ₱ in 2007
MALAYSIA
IMPACT TO MALAYSIA
 Malaysian ringgit (MYR) is the currency of Malaysia
 Devaluation of Thai baht in July 1997 increased demand for MYR
 In 1997 MYR devalued from 2.50RM to 4.57RM against 1 US dollar
 GDP dropped by 6.2% in 1998
 Ultimately Malaysian economy dropped the country to collapse.
HOW MALAYSIA OVRCAME
 Various protective measures were taken into action
 Malaysian authorities imposed capital controls
 Pegged the ringgit at a value of 3.8RM to 1 US dollar.
 They refused the aids of IMF
 Established different task force agencies.
JAPAN
 Japan markets were also hit but the markets did not collapse
 40% of the Japan’s exports were sent to Asian markets
 Japan had to run on a trade deficit
 This decreased the Japanese GDP growth rate from 5% to 1.6%
 Led to an increment in bankruptcies in Japan.
1950 SEOUL 2015
 Shutting down all the merchant banks.
 Economy collapsed quarterly at an average rate of -6.65%.
 The finance sector was loaded with non-performing loans for aggressive
expansions.
 Excess debt of Chaebols’ directed them to failures and takeovers.
 The Seoul stock exchange fell by 11.2%
 $5 billion venture of Hyundai Motors, Kia Motors. Samsung Motors was dissolved due to the crisis.
The South Korean won decreased to more than 1,700 per U.S. dollar from around 800.
• Nation’s financial problems were handled with the arrangements by the South Korean
government and debt exchanges.
• Much of South Korea's recovery from the Crisis was credited to labor modifications and
alternate funding sources.
• GDP growth had risen to 5.4% by the first quarter of 1999, and strong growth in currency lead
to an annual growth of 10.5%.
In order to provide a helping hand to South Korea IMF
offered USD $21 billion loan as a part of USD $58.4
billion bailout plan by December 1997.
This lead Koreas situation even worse.
 After the Financial Crisis, many are aware on preventing such in Future.
 Prof. Gray B. Gorton’s new type of test for financial institutions and banks.
 Central Banks potential to end future crisis with their experiences on 1997.
 The design of '' Dodd Frank Act'' to prevent future financial crisis.
CONCLUSION
 1997 Asian markets were living an unmanageable lifestyle
 began with Thailand and was spread through the Asian markets
 Major reasons
 extensive amounts of foreign funds
fixed exchange rate
poor corporate control, weak investment systems
less exports
ASIAN CRISIS CAUSED:
 a devaluation of currencies
 led to stock market crashes
 reduced the trade revenues
increased their private debt.
LATER ASIAN MARKETS:
 increased tax revenues
stabilized their financial markets
paid off the debts to IMF.
IMF provided loans and investments.

Asian fianancial crisis

  • 2.
    GROUP MEMEBERS • SHANIKADILRUKSHI • SACHIN ABEYKOON • SACHINI UDUGE • UGEEMA DE SILVA • SHAKTHI DISSANAYAKE • AVISHA SENEVIRATHNE • PIYATH GUNAWARDENA • SINTHUJA ESWARAN
  • 3.
    FINANCIAL CRISIS Situation ofa country’s economy when they find themselves in an unmanageable lifestyle Debt of a country equalizes to the income of a nation. It causes devaluation of currencies and stock
  • 4.
    ASIAN FINANCIAL CRISIS Unsustainable lifestyle was maintained in Asian markets  Aroused in July 1997  Also called Asian contagion  It began and spread throughout Asia resulting currency devaluations
  • 5.
    ASIA BEFORE FINANCIALCRISIS Asian countries had an extraordinary records of economic performances in 1994-1997 Asian markets went through:  Fast economic growth,  Low inflations,  Strong financial positions a stability  Increases saving rates  Open economies  Blooming export divisions flourishing Asian markets did not predict any financial crisis
  • 6.
    BEGINNING OF ASIANFINANCIAL CRISIS  Began from Thailand (Tom Yum Goong crisis)  IMF (International Monetary Fund)  Thailand Authorities was notified about the upcoming crisis by IMF  Convincing Thailand was a failure  IMF assumed that the Thailand were tolerable to the crisis.  Occurred due to the shortage of foreign currency to upkeep its stable exchange rate.
  • 7.
    AFFECTED COUNTRIES  Allcountries underwent a loss of demand and self-confidence  But in a different degree of impact  Highly affected countries:- Indonesia, South Korea, and Thailand.  Moderate impact to :- Hong Kong, Malaysia and Philippines.  Least impact to :- Japan, China, Singapore and Vietnam.
  • 8.
    AT THE ENDOF ASIAN FINANCIAL CRISIS  This crisis spread throughout the Asian markets.  It caused:  Collapsing currencies  Stock market crashes  Devalued assets  Reduced import revenues  Increment in private debt
  • 9.
    ROLE OF IMFAFTER THE CRISIS  Adopt to protective strategies to safeguard the stability of their own currency.  Affected authorities requested help from IMF  IMF  provided financial assistance  provided the biggest loans in its history.  and the World Bank then secured the financial stability
  • 11.
    (1)  Low interestswere provided for funds in Asia  Investors shifted extensive amounts of foreign funds  Asian underwent economic boom  But there was a poor corporate control and weak investment systems  It left the foreign capital unproductive.
  • 12.
    (2)  Acquired dollar-denominateddebt.  Fixed exchange rates  pictured them an incorrect sense of safe keeping
  • 13.
    (3)  Exports ofAsian countries were weak  Because of the:  Indebtedness of US dollar in compared to Yen  Weakening value of china’s Yuan in 1994  NAFTA following market collapses  extensive foreign funds and wilting exports  enlarging account deficiencies
  • 14.
    IMPACT OF ASIANFINANCIAL CRISIS TO DIFFERENT COUNTRIES
  • 15.
    THAILAND IMPACT TO THAILAND Huge downsizings in financial assets, constructions and stocks  Population was left unemployed  600,000 foreign employees left Thailand  75% dropped in Thai Stock market  Thai finance companies collapsed
  • 16.
    IMF ROLE TOTHAILAND  Provided a helping hand to Thailand  Provided a set of loans and investments. THAILAND AFTER THE FINANCIAL CRISIS  Stabilized its budget  Paid off their debt to IMF
  • 17.
    PHILIPPINES  Philippines Pesos(PHP) is the currency of Philippines  PHP was devalued from 26 ₱ to 55.75 ₱ against 1 US dollar  Later after the PHP was appreciated to 53 ₱ in 2001  And PHP was appreciated to 41 ₱ in 2007
  • 18.
    MALAYSIA IMPACT TO MALAYSIA Malaysian ringgit (MYR) is the currency of Malaysia  Devaluation of Thai baht in July 1997 increased demand for MYR  In 1997 MYR devalued from 2.50RM to 4.57RM against 1 US dollar  GDP dropped by 6.2% in 1998  Ultimately Malaysian economy dropped the country to collapse.
  • 19.
    HOW MALAYSIA OVRCAME Various protective measures were taken into action  Malaysian authorities imposed capital controls  Pegged the ringgit at a value of 3.8RM to 1 US dollar.  They refused the aids of IMF  Established different task force agencies.
  • 20.
    JAPAN  Japan marketswere also hit but the markets did not collapse  40% of the Japan’s exports were sent to Asian markets  Japan had to run on a trade deficit  This decreased the Japanese GDP growth rate from 5% to 1.6%  Led to an increment in bankruptcies in Japan.
  • 21.
  • 22.
     Shutting downall the merchant banks.  Economy collapsed quarterly at an average rate of -6.65%.  The finance sector was loaded with non-performing loans for aggressive expansions.  Excess debt of Chaebols’ directed them to failures and takeovers.  The Seoul stock exchange fell by 11.2%  $5 billion venture of Hyundai Motors, Kia Motors. Samsung Motors was dissolved due to the crisis. The South Korean won decreased to more than 1,700 per U.S. dollar from around 800.
  • 23.
    • Nation’s financialproblems were handled with the arrangements by the South Korean government and debt exchanges. • Much of South Korea's recovery from the Crisis was credited to labor modifications and alternate funding sources. • GDP growth had risen to 5.4% by the first quarter of 1999, and strong growth in currency lead to an annual growth of 10.5%.
  • 24.
    In order toprovide a helping hand to South Korea IMF offered USD $21 billion loan as a part of USD $58.4 billion bailout plan by December 1997. This lead Koreas situation even worse.
  • 25.
     After theFinancial Crisis, many are aware on preventing such in Future.  Prof. Gray B. Gorton’s new type of test for financial institutions and banks.  Central Banks potential to end future crisis with their experiences on 1997.  The design of '' Dodd Frank Act'' to prevent future financial crisis.
  • 26.
    CONCLUSION  1997 Asianmarkets were living an unmanageable lifestyle  began with Thailand and was spread through the Asian markets  Major reasons  extensive amounts of foreign funds fixed exchange rate poor corporate control, weak investment systems less exports
  • 27.
    ASIAN CRISIS CAUSED: a devaluation of currencies  led to stock market crashes  reduced the trade revenues increased their private debt. LATER ASIAN MARKETS:  increased tax revenues stabilized their financial markets paid off the debts to IMF. IMF provided loans and investments.