The student learned how to use video equipment like cameras and tripods through completing a group preliminary task. They worked well together, giving each other advice to improve their video. However, they realized they could have improved it further by spending more time editing. They successfully storyboarded and filmed multiple takes when needed, but refilming wasted lesson time. The student also gained skills that will help with future group projects.
This is my Media Studies Preliminary Evaluation for a short piece of film that I created. The film is on my blogger account also, but the broad idea was to have two people walking into a room and exchanging dialogue before leaving the room.
This is my Media Studies Preliminary Evaluation for a short piece of film that I created. The film is on my blogger account also, but the broad idea was to have two people walking into a room and exchanging dialogue before leaving the room.
this was the presentation i did for my preliminary task and it had a lot of detail of what we needed to do and what we polished. hope you like it and any feedback will be appreciated.
this was the presentation i did for my preliminary task and it had a lot of detail of what we needed to do and what we polished. hope you like it and any feedback will be appreciated.
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024Albert Hoitingh
In this session I delve into the encryption technology used in Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Purview. Including the concepts of Customer Key and Double Key Encryption.
Accelerate your Kubernetes clusters with Varnish CachingThijs Feryn
A presentation about the usage and availability of Varnish on Kubernetes. This talk explores the capabilities of Varnish caching and shows how to use the Varnish Helm chart to deploy it to Kubernetes.
This presentation was delivered at K8SUG Singapore. See https://feryn.eu/presentations/accelerate-your-kubernetes-clusters-with-varnish-caching-k8sug-singapore-28-2024 for more details.
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
Builder.ai Founder Sachin Dev Duggal's Strategic Approach to Create an Innova...Ramesh Iyer
In today's fast-changing business world, Companies that adapt and embrace new ideas often need help to keep up with the competition. However, fostering a culture of innovation takes much work. It takes vision, leadership and willingness to take risks in the right proportion. Sachin Dev Duggal, co-founder of Builder.ai, has perfected the art of this balance, creating a company culture where creativity and growth are nurtured at each stage.
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf91mobiles
91mobiles recently conducted a Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey in which we asked over 3,000 respondents about the TV they own, aspects they look at on a new TV, and their TV buying preferences.
Transcript: Selling digital books in 2024: Insights from industry leaders - T...BookNet Canada
The publishing industry has been selling digital audiobooks and ebooks for over a decade and has found its groove. What’s changed? What has stayed the same? Where do we go from here? Join a group of leading sales peers from across the industry for a conversation about the lessons learned since the popularization of digital books, best practices, digital book supply chain management, and more.
Link to video recording: https://bnctechforum.ca/sessions/selling-digital-books-in-2024-insights-from-industry-leaders/
Presented by BookNet Canada on May 28, 2024, with support from the Department of Canadian Heritage.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 3. In this session, we will cover desktop automation along with UI automation.
Topics covered:
UI automation Introduction,
UI automation Sample
Desktop automation flow
Pradeep Chinnala, Senior Consultant Automation Developer @WonderBotz and UiPath MVP
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI supportAlan Dix
Paper presented at SYNERGY workshop at AVI 2024, Genoa, Italy. 3rd June 2024
https://alandix.com/academic/papers/synergy2024-epistemic/
As machine learning integrates deeper into human-computer interactions, the concept of epistemic interaction emerges, aiming to refine these interactions to enhance system adaptability. This approach encourages minor, intentional adjustments in user behaviour to enrich the data available for system learning. This paper introduces epistemic interaction within the context of human-system communication, illustrating how deliberate interaction design can improve system understanding and adaptation. Through concrete examples, we demonstrate the potential of epistemic interaction to significantly advance human-computer interaction by leveraging intuitive human communication strategies to inform system design and functionality, offering a novel pathway for enriching user-system engagements.
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI support
AS Media preliminary task evaluation.
1. What have I Learned during the making of the Preliminary
Task?
I feel I have achieved a lot from the preliminary task. Before we started, I
had no clue on how to attach cameras to tripods or even how to turn on a
camera.
I can now confidently attach a camera to a tripod securely and turn it on,
start recording and then stop/pause the camera.
Something I feel I need to value more is the time we have as a group to
create the video, we used all our lesson time effectively. However, we
could have used some time out of lessons to touch up on certain parts of
the footage to ensure that everything was perfect and not just ‘okay’.
We worked well as a group, giving advice to each other when we felt
something could be changed or improved whilst filming the preliminary
task.
2. What have I Learned during the making of the Preliminary
Task?
We referred to our storyboard throughout the whole of our task, we changed parts of
it which we felt were necessary to fit our task. Using a storyboard was useful
because it would help us plan our scenes instead of just improvising on the day
of filming.
We had to film our footage several times due to different reasons:
Continuity, changing of ideas etc.
This was inconvenient because we wasted a lesson which could have been
used for editing purely on re-filming. This is something that I feel let our group
down. However, at the end we detected little continuity errors, which was good.
3. Areas of success.
I feel that as a group we worked well together and we were confident discussing
different ideas with each other to develop further onto our plan.
We bounced off each others ideas which was useful because this ensured that no one
was too dominant over the group ideas and decisions and enabled us to connect
throughout the task without there being disruption or disturbance between the group.
We got on with the task quickly, giving ourselves enough time to adjust things and
to double check on which equipment we needed and how to set up the equipment
without taking too long.
We finished the task a few lessons before the deadline date, this gave us enough
time to check the editing was done appropriately to match each scene.
We used a range of different shots throughout our task.
4. We used a leading line shot to make
the audience follow and notify
where Rachael was walking to,
making them focus on the door and
Rachael at the same time.
I feel this worked well during our
task.
We used shot-reverse shot within our preliminary task, we did this to show how the
conversation was flowing and who the other person was talking to. We also did this to
ensure that continuity was correct during the conversation.
5. Areas for development.
When we got to the editing stage, we watched all our clips together to assure that our storyline
followed well. We noticed on one of the scenes as the door opened you can see our reflection
in the mirror
A way we can prevent this from
happening again, would be to watch our
footage before moving on to the next
scene to double check whether we need
to alter anything or not.
Something else that slowed the filming process down
was the location we chose to film our task in.
There was always people walking past and up and down
the stairs which made it difficult to have a flowing
lesson of filming, it did delay us slightly. A way to
avoid this would be to plan a place to film where it isn’t
very busy so we can film without any interruptions.
6. How well did you meet the brief?
In our short film we included a range of shots, but we were asked to include
three specific shots:
180 degree rule.
Shot/reverse shot.
Match on action
As I have previously shown we did do shot/reverse shot during our preliminary
task. We also used match on action to assure that our scene’s flowed
appropriately.
Here we showed Rachael
entering the room from
the outside and then her
walking in to the inside.
We did not include 180 degree rule. This is a fault on our behalf
because we needed to include these three shots and we failed to
do that. This is something we need to work on in the future.
7. Feedback from others.
Brandon Hoult watched our preliminary task and he gave me three good and bad things
within our video.
The three good things were:
-The wind sound effect at the beginning was effective for the audience to identify the
atmosphere of the scene.
-The positioning of the angles were good throughout the whole video.
-The zooming in was effective at the end to show how evil the character was and the
emotion behind the person talking.
The three bad things were:
-The length of each shot whilst we were talking was too long, it got slightly boring in
the middle.
-Our reflection was seen in the window which broke the reality of the video.
-The length of the walk at the beginning was too long and could have been cut down.
8. Evaluate your group contribution
to the group’s work.
We worked well together as a group to film/edit and finish our preliminary task before
the deadline. We all gave ideas which we used, tested and changed throughout the task,
this made it easier for us to work together because everyone had a fair chance with their
ideas.
I feel I wasn’t as flexible as I should have been within the task, this let my group down
slightly on my behalf, this is something I need to improve for when it comes down to my
real task.
I gained many skills from this task, including how to attach a camera to a tripod, how to
film and edit using different software's. I know where everything is in the classrooms so I
can get straight on with my work, for the next project we do.
Overall I feel we worked well together as a group and produced a fairly average video.
I am pleased at this fact and at the fact we all got on well and used all our ideas to finish
off our preliminary task.