Alternate Dispute
Resolution
APPEALS
Appealable orders
(Section 37)
 An appeal shall lie from the following
orders (and from no others) to the court
authority by law to hear appeals from
original decrees of the court passing the
order, namely:
 Granting or refusing to grant any measure
under section 9
 Setting aside or refusing to set aside an arbitral
award by the court under section 34.
2
Section 37(2)
 An appeal shall also lie to a court from an order
of the arbitral tribunal:
 Accepting the plea referred to in sub-section (2) or sub-
section (3) of Section 16; or
 Granting or refusing to grant any interim measure under
section 17.
3
Section 37(3)
 No second appeal shall lie from an order
passed in appeal under this section, but
nothing in this section shall affect or take
away any right to appeal to the supreme
court.
4
 Lakme Ltd. v. Plethice Pharl Ltd. (2003)4 Raj 649
(MP)
 The court said that as per section 115 CPC, the
High Court may entertain a revision petition when
a subordinate court has refused to exercise a
jurisdiction vested in it.
 Shyam Sunder v. Union of India (1996) 2 SCC 132
 Revision Application is maintainable.
5

Appeals under Alternate Dispute Resolution

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Appealable orders (Section 37) An appeal shall lie from the following orders (and from no others) to the court authority by law to hear appeals from original decrees of the court passing the order, namely:  Granting or refusing to grant any measure under section 9  Setting aside or refusing to set aside an arbitral award by the court under section 34. 2
  • 3.
    Section 37(2)  Anappeal shall also lie to a court from an order of the arbitral tribunal:  Accepting the plea referred to in sub-section (2) or sub- section (3) of Section 16; or  Granting or refusing to grant any interim measure under section 17. 3
  • 4.
    Section 37(3)  Nosecond appeal shall lie from an order passed in appeal under this section, but nothing in this section shall affect or take away any right to appeal to the supreme court. 4
  • 5.
     Lakme Ltd.v. Plethice Pharl Ltd. (2003)4 Raj 649 (MP)  The court said that as per section 115 CPC, the High Court may entertain a revision petition when a subordinate court has refused to exercise a jurisdiction vested in it.  Shyam Sunder v. Union of India (1996) 2 SCC 132  Revision Application is maintainable. 5