The document provides an overview of America's current and future electricity generation capacity. It analyzes capacity by fuel type, region, development stage, and ownership. Currently, natural gas accounts for 42% of capacity and coal 27%. Nearly 372,000 MW of new capacity is planned, with natural gas and wind being the dominant future fuel sources. The Southeast currently has the most capacity, but the West is expected to add the most new capacity. The overall fuel mix will gradually change but remain similar in 2020, with natural gas remaining the leading resource.
Energy crisis
Energy Demand and Supply Statistics
Power Production Sources
Causes of Energy Crisis
Consequences of Energy Crisis in Pakistan
Suggestion/ Recommendations and Solutions
Power Sector at A Glance, the monthly newsletter was founded by the management students of UPES,Dehradun. The main objective it is to provide a digital collection of all power sector news, editorials & articles in one newsletter.
The newsletter focuses on helping power sector professionals to stay updated without loosing time & money, & can be referred anywhere, anytime . The PSAG has published 9 successful editions and has a distribution network of more than 4000 in power sector companies, consultants and professionals.
Energy crisis
Energy Demand and Supply Statistics
Power Production Sources
Causes of Energy Crisis
Consequences of Energy Crisis in Pakistan
Suggestion/ Recommendations and Solutions
Power Sector at A Glance, the monthly newsletter was founded by the management students of UPES,Dehradun. The main objective it is to provide a digital collection of all power sector news, editorials & articles in one newsletter.
The newsletter focuses on helping power sector professionals to stay updated without loosing time & money, & can be referred anywhere, anytime . The PSAG has published 9 successful editions and has a distribution network of more than 4000 in power sector companies, consultants and professionals.
A Green New Deal 2018 - energy and jobs in the UKJeremy Leggett
Repairing economies requires major new investments in sustainable-energy jobs (that will more than pay themselves back), and the UK is a perfect example
Simon Reeve shares his predictions on the future energy mix, taking into consideration recent events such as Deepwater Horizon and Fukushima. Simon is joined by key energy professionals offering perspectives from different corners of the industry.
Simon is the Power Sector Director for the Lloyd's Register Group.
Winds of change: Offshore U.S. farms finally herehardhathub
John Gregerson, with Rob McManamy from BuiltWorlds dive into North America's first offshore wind energy farm finally reaching critical mass this month with the achievement of two significant milestones in New England being developed by Deepwater Wind and GE Renewable Energy. Will be known as the Block Island Wind Farm.
This webinar session discusses changes to the generation portfolio, the introduction of significant renewable resources, and the deployment of customer-side resources.
This is a presentation which I delivered at a conference. The theme is to point out the crisis in the power sector in Pakistan. The renewable energy development at the Global level to show that wind and solar have become viable and mature technologically. It shows Pakistan's potential and the way forward. There will be many more presentations on the subject to deal with various areas in more detail.
China nuclear power sector opportunity analysisKuicK Research
“China Nuclear Power Sector Opportunity Analysis” Report Highlight:
China Power Sector Overview
China Nuclear Power Sector Overview
China Nuclear Power Sector Installed & Projected Capacity
Nuclear Fuel Procurement Overview
Insight on Existing & Upcoming Nuclear Plants
China Nuclear Power Sector Regulatory Landscape
China Nuclear Power Plant Infrastructure & Technology
China Emerging Exporter of Nuclear Reactor Technology
Wind and solar energy—two of the most popular
sources of renewable energy—are sometimes touted
as the answer to the world’s energy challenges.
Some advocates of these energy sources want us
to believe they can solve a plethora of problems,
ranging from avoiding the disastrous 2010 oil leak
in the Gulf region to materially reducing global
climate change. Wind and solar energy are also
routinely promoted with the promise of green jobs,
which will lead to a green technology revolution
while improving the environment—and making
us “energy independent” to boot. But how well do
wind and solar energy solutions actually perform on
these promises? Let’s take a rational loo
A Green New Deal 2018 - energy and jobs in the UKJeremy Leggett
Repairing economies requires major new investments in sustainable-energy jobs (that will more than pay themselves back), and the UK is a perfect example
Simon Reeve shares his predictions on the future energy mix, taking into consideration recent events such as Deepwater Horizon and Fukushima. Simon is joined by key energy professionals offering perspectives from different corners of the industry.
Simon is the Power Sector Director for the Lloyd's Register Group.
Winds of change: Offshore U.S. farms finally herehardhathub
John Gregerson, with Rob McManamy from BuiltWorlds dive into North America's first offshore wind energy farm finally reaching critical mass this month with the achievement of two significant milestones in New England being developed by Deepwater Wind and GE Renewable Energy. Will be known as the Block Island Wind Farm.
This webinar session discusses changes to the generation portfolio, the introduction of significant renewable resources, and the deployment of customer-side resources.
This is a presentation which I delivered at a conference. The theme is to point out the crisis in the power sector in Pakistan. The renewable energy development at the Global level to show that wind and solar have become viable and mature technologically. It shows Pakistan's potential and the way forward. There will be many more presentations on the subject to deal with various areas in more detail.
China nuclear power sector opportunity analysisKuicK Research
“China Nuclear Power Sector Opportunity Analysis” Report Highlight:
China Power Sector Overview
China Nuclear Power Sector Overview
China Nuclear Power Sector Installed & Projected Capacity
Nuclear Fuel Procurement Overview
Insight on Existing & Upcoming Nuclear Plants
China Nuclear Power Sector Regulatory Landscape
China Nuclear Power Plant Infrastructure & Technology
China Emerging Exporter of Nuclear Reactor Technology
Wind and solar energy—two of the most popular
sources of renewable energy—are sometimes touted
as the answer to the world’s energy challenges.
Some advocates of these energy sources want us
to believe they can solve a plethora of problems,
ranging from avoiding the disastrous 2010 oil leak
in the Gulf region to materially reducing global
climate change. Wind and solar energy are also
routinely promoted with the promise of green jobs,
which will lead to a green technology revolution
while improving the environment—and making
us “energy independent” to boot. But how well do
wind and solar energy solutions actually perform on
these promises? Let’s take a rational loo
Annual report issued by the American Petroleum Institute that looks at not only natural gas, but wind, solar, biomass, nuclear and other forms of energy and the role they play in the U.S. Just a few short years ago it was inconceivable that America would be the world's leading energy producer! Why? The miracle of hydraulic fracturing.
Lattice energy LLC - Climate change can reduce wind and solar power output - ...Lewis Larsen
A mystery wind drought hit the U.S. in the first half of 2015. Total wind-powered electrical output in the U.S. during that year went down 6% while total installed capacity went up 9%. Thus climate change disrupts prior weather patterns which can then impact renewables. If you believe wind and solar can someday totally replace short-notice sources of dispatchable power generation then think again, because they simply can’t --- ever.
Given innate variability in power output from renewable green energy sources, substantial amounts of short-notice dispatchable generation capacity are an unavoidable necessity that, along with a shift toward distributed generation, could serve as key system components crucial to maintaining modern high-availability electricity grids that continue to provide customers with 99+ % uptime during an era of increasing climate change. Having adequate dispatchable power generation capacity on-hand would thus be invaluable in helping to insure reliable, low-cost energy production and prudent risk management with respect to sudden unexpected “Black Swan” events such as extremely large volcanic eruptions and violent earthquakes that can adversely impact power generation by renewables.
Published peer-reviewed data suggests that it would also be prudent for global society to reduce future CO2 emissions from power generation activities. This will eventually happen anyway because at current rates of consumption, British Petroleum has estimated that fossil fuel resources will be totally exhausted in <150 years. Well, nuclear power plants are dispatchable and do not emit any CO2. Like it or not, major worldwide expansion of nuclear power generation is probably inevitable and could play a key strategic role in the long-term future of energy. In that regard, if safe radiation-free ultralow energy neutron reactions (LENRs) are successfully commercialized for producing green nuclear power, they could someday provide the future “energy miracle” sought by Bill Gates.
High Efficiency - A Green Revolution In Dc PowerEltek
An Eltek Valere Whitepaper:
How a revolution in DC Power Systems can reduce electricity usage and carbon emissions.
energy for the Telecom Industry.
For more information, visit www.eltekvalere.com
Policy Recommendations For Chinese Renewable Energy Industry Glenn Klith Andersen
The Renewable Energy Network for the 21st Century (REN21) recently released a report titled Recommendations for Improving the Effectiveness of Renewable Energy Policies in China. The report provides a list of recommendations to the policy makers in China on improving the effectiveness of renewable energy policies domestically.
Maintaining Reliability in the Modern Power System Maintaining Reliability in the Modern Power System Maintaining Reliability in the Modern Power System Maintaining Reliability in the Modern Power System Maintaining Reliability in the Modern Power System Maintaining Reliability in the Modern Power System Maintaining Reliability in the Modern Power System Maintaining Reliability in the Modern Power System Maintaining Reliability in the Modern Power System Maintaining Reliability in the Modern Power System Maintaining Reliability in the Modern Power System Maintaining Reliability in the Modern Power System Maintaining Reliability in the Modern Power System Maintaining Reliability in the Modern Power System Maintaining Reliability in the Modern Power System Maintaining Reliability in the Modern Power System Maintaining Reliability in the Modern Power System Maintaining Reliability in the Modern Power System Maintaining Reliability in the Modern Power System Maintaining Reliability in the Modern Power System Maintaining Reliability in the Modern Power System
The Innovation Issue. Electricity: The Greatest Innovation of All Time
FEATURES:
-APPA's DEED program brings new ideas to scale
-The Instant Gratification Grid: Today's electricity customers want more and they want it now. Utilities in all sectors are prioritizing new, smart technologies.
-Smart Utilities, Smart Cities
-Career Day
Powering Ahead: The Future of Electricity
-Moving Public Power Forward, Together:
Technology often changes the way we live our lives. Remember what life was like before smartphones — I actually used to read paper maps!
- Energy Storage: Changing the Game, Changing the Grid:
Energy storage is emerging as a jack-of-all-trades resource. It's essential to renewable generation proliferation; the backbone of the smartphone decade; and the technology behind peak-shaving, grid-shoring, and other ancillary services.
-Compare and Save With Web-Based Energy Efficiency Tool:
Franklin D. Roosevelt may have said comparison is the thief of joy, but to the contrary, it can be the source of valuable information for utilities.
-Changes to Emission Rules Cloud the Future:
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in early August released its final rule under section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from existing power plants.
-Smart Meters Are Smart Enough to Protect Your Privacy:
Since 2012, utilities in the United States have set up more than 43 million advanced meter installations, known as smart meters, in homes and businesses, and more are being installed every day.
-Charge of the Light Brigade: Is Your Utility Ready for Electric Cars? For many people, the rise in popularity of electric vehicles may seem like something new. What they may not realize is that the first electric car was introduced in 1832, around the same time engineers were developing the first internal combustion engine.
-What Does the Future of Energy Use Look Like? Captain Public Power takes a peek into the future with his young friends.
-Microgrids: Self-Sufficient Energy Islands:
Microgrids can run independently, making small towns into energy islands — a strategy public power utilities have been employing for decades.
-The Evolving Electric Grid, Customer and Utility:
Today, the electric power industry — a fundamental industry that powers our economy and our lives — is in the midst of a profound transition.
-The Future Is Now:
The utility of the future is greener, smarter, more efficient and more flexible. For some public power utilities, the future is now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Power magazine is the trade magazine for the more than 2,000 community-owned electric utilities that serve more than 48 million people in the United States. The American Public Power Association publishes the magazine bi-monthly online and in print.
Join the discussion! Use #PublicPower and connect with us:
https://www.facebook.com/americanpublicpower
https://twitter.com/publicpowerorg
https://instagram.com/publicpowerorg/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/american-public-power-association
https://www.pinterest.com/publicpowerorg/
Public Power Magazine - The Community Solar Issue:
-8 Find Fertile Ground in Public Power: Public power was an early adopter of the community solar trend.
-14 Fund a Solar Suitcase: Give the gift of electricity to save lives.
-20 Healthy Choices: Choosing the best distributed generation rate design for your utility.
-26 Customer Perspectives: Community solar customers are informed and eager participants.
-32 The Many Dimensions of Leadership:
An interview with Doug Hunter, chairman of the American Public Power Association.
-41 What Is Community Solar? Captain Public Power explains how community solar works.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Power magazine is the trade magazine for the more than 2,000 community-owned electric utilities that serve more than 48 million people in the United States. The American Public Power Association publishes the magazine bi-monthly online and in print.
Join the discussion! Use #PublicPower and connect with us:
https://www.facebook.com/americanpublicpower
https://twitter.com/publicpowerorg
https://instagram.com/publicpowerorg/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/american-public-power-association
https://www.pinterest.com/publicpowerorg/
The American Public Power Association’s “Rate Design for Distributed Generation” report examines rate design options for solar and other distributed generation (DG), using public power utility case studies. The report discusses how utilities have educated customers about new rates, and how DG
and non-DG customers responded. While the rate design options have some drawbacks, and might not be technically feasible for all utilities, they offer the industry new models that account for the rate impacts of distributed generation.
The use of DG, particularly rooftop solar photovoltaic (PV), is growing fast. As of October 2014, just under 8,000 megawatts (MW) of solar capacity was installed on residential and business rooftops across the United States (U.S.).1
The growth of DG has been spurred by environmental concerns and economic considerations. Federal and state tax incentives are a driving force behind solar PV installations
and can together cover up to 70 percent of the total cost of solar panels in some states.2 Declining solar panel prices have also fueled growth in rooftop solar. Utility rate structures for distributed generation have provided a significant benefit to solar customers.
As DG becomes more widespread, rate analysts and researchers are developing new rate designs to help ensure that utilities recover their cost of service, encouraging while providing appropriate incentives for rooftop solar deployment.
Utilities can no longer afford to take a wait and see approach in rate design for DG, nor should they assume that old rate designs adopted before the escalation in DG installations will work in the future.
Most utilities in the U.S. use net metering to measure and compensate customers for the generation they produce. However net metering has several shortcomings and results in non-DG customers subsidizing DG customers.
Utilities have options other than traditional net metering. Many public power utilities have adopted new rate designs to serve DG customers. Some of these rate designs supplement net metering by recouping more of their fixed costs through fixed charges, while other designs provide comprehensive alternatives to net metering.
Utility rate setters must balance between simplicity and accuracy, align costs and prices, support environmental stewardship, and ensure that rate designs are well suited to customers. Customer communication and engagement are essential components of the rate-setting process.
This report does not examine every rate design option, nor does it suggest a single best option. It offers alternatives
to traditional net metering, with case studies. Utilities
can consider how they can adapt rate designs to suit their community’s needs, factoring in market structure, state policies, and other considerations.
In the late 1990s, many states began to usher in retail choice for customers of investor-owned utilities. During this same time period, the wholesale markets in a number of regions were restructured and prices were deregulated. These restructured wholesale markets, operated by Regional Transmission Organizations, generally overlap with the retail choice states. The intent of both the retail and wholesale restructuring was to reduce electricity rates through competition.
However, after nearly two decades of retail and wholesale electric market restructuring, the promise of reduced rates has failed to materialize. In fact, customers in states with retail choice programs located within RTO-operated markets are now paying more for their electricity.
In 1997, the retail electric rate in deregulated states — the ones offering retail choice and located within an RTO — was 2.8 cents per kilowatt-hour (kWh) higher than rates in the regulated states with no retail choice. The gap has increased over the last two decades. In 2014, customers in deregulated states paid, on average, 3.3 cents per kWh more than customers in regulated states.
The details are in a new report, 2014 Retail Electric Rates in Deregulated and Regulated States, issued by the American Public Power Association. The report examines how retail rates have been affected by the restructuring of the wholesale markets.
Proponents of the restructuring of retail and wholesale electricity markets in the 1990s claimed that competition would create incentives for greater efficiencies in generation and lower retail electricity rates.
APPA’s report compares average retail electric rates paid by residential, commercial, and industrial end users in deregulated and regulated states. In the deregulated states, the investor-owned utilities no longer own generation and must buy power from the RTO-operated markets. Alternative suppliers also purchase from these markets. Public power utilities purchase from these markets to the extent they do not own generation, and their contracts for power are often influenced by RTO market prices. Customers in these deregulated states are therefore exposed to the prices from the RTO markets. In the regulated states, the utilities continue to be vertically integrated and much less power is purchased from the wholesale markets. States without retail access are included in this category regardless of whether they are located in an RTO.
APPA’s report reveals that in 2014, states in the deregulated category had an average retail electricity rate of 12.7 cents per kWh, while regulated states had an average rate of 9.4 cents, a 3.3 cent difference. In 1997, at the start of deregulation, the differential was 2.8 cents and has since increased by 0.5 cents.
Read more: http://blog.publicpower.org/sme/?p=547
Contents: Seventy-Five Years of Strength, a look back at public power’s roots shows achievement in the face of overwhelming force and continued advancement in the average American’s quality of life.
-Powerful Leadership
Public power’s leaders steer their community-owned utilities with communication, collaboration and strength.
-What Is Leadership, Anyway?
Editor, author and APPA National Conference speaker Geoff Colvin maps the path to success that anyone can follow.
-Top 10 Leadership Reads
Get the best insight on leadership with these books recommended by public power’s leadership in Washington.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Power magazine is the trade magazine for the more than 2,000 community-owned electric utilities that serve more than 48 million people in the United States. The American Public Power Association publishes the magazine bi-monthly online and in print.
Join the discussion! Use #PublicPower and connect with us:
https://www.facebook.com/americanpublicpower
https://twitter.com/publicpowerorg
https://instagram.com/publicpowerorg/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/american-public-power-association
https://www.pinterest.com/publicpowerorg/
Contents: We want you to be a lineworker: Still a viable career, a new era of electrical work is luring the next generation of professionals.
-Public Power on the Hill: Elected representatives don’t have much time to spare; read how to make the most of a Hill visit.
-Why Is Energy Storage Suddenly Such a Big Deal?
Batteries are leading the way in a new wave of energy storage technologies and utilities are ready to give the field the jolt it needs.
-Make Solar Work for You: Customers want solar and no matter how they access it, they will turn to their utility for help.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Power magazine is the trade magazine for the more than 2,000 community-owned electric utilities that serve more than 48 million people in the United States. The American Public Power Association publishes the magazine bi-monthly online and in print.
Join the discussion! Use #PublicPower and connect with us:
https://www.facebook.com/americanpublicpower
https://twitter.com/publicpowerorg
https://instagram.com/publicpowerorg/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/american-public-power-association
https://www.pinterest.com/publicpowerorg/
Contents: Hoping for the Best, Preparing for the Worst: Utilities continue to prepare to implement the EPA's most sweeping carbon-dioxide rule to date.
-Nuclear Still Delivers: Some public power utilities continue to invest in nuclear power plants as CO2-free, diversified energy sources.
-Smart Start for Public Power: Utilities modernized the gird with smart meters.
-Power in Numbers: New Jersey public power utilities are trying to secure state legislation that would allow them to work together through a joint action agency and harness economies of scale.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Power magazine is the trade magazine for the more than 2,000 community-owned electric utilities that serve more than 48 million people in the United States. The American Public Power Association publishes the magazine bi-monthly online and in print.
Join the discussion! Use #PublicPower and connect with us:
https://www.facebook.com/americanpublicpower
https://twitter.com/publicpowerorg
https://instagram.com/publicpowerorg/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/american-public-power-association
https://www.pinterest.com/publicpowerorg/
Explore our comprehensive data analysis project presentation on predicting product ad campaign performance. Learn how data-driven insights can optimize your marketing strategies and enhance campaign effectiveness. Perfect for professionals and students looking to understand the power of data analysis in advertising. for more details visit: https://bostoninstituteofanalytics.org/data-science-and-artificial-intelligence/
Show drafts
volume_up
Empowering the Data Analytics Ecosystem: A Laser Focus on Value
The data analytics ecosystem thrives when every component functions at its peak, unlocking the true potential of data. Here's a laser focus on key areas for an empowered ecosystem:
1. Democratize Access, Not Data:
Granular Access Controls: Provide users with self-service tools tailored to their specific needs, preventing data overload and misuse.
Data Catalogs: Implement robust data catalogs for easy discovery and understanding of available data sources.
2. Foster Collaboration with Clear Roles:
Data Mesh Architecture: Break down data silos by creating a distributed data ownership model with clear ownership and responsibilities.
Collaborative Workspaces: Utilize interactive platforms where data scientists, analysts, and domain experts can work seamlessly together.
3. Leverage Advanced Analytics Strategically:
AI-powered Automation: Automate repetitive tasks like data cleaning and feature engineering, freeing up data talent for higher-level analysis.
Right-Tool Selection: Strategically choose the most effective advanced analytics techniques (e.g., AI, ML) based on specific business problems.
4. Prioritize Data Quality with Automation:
Automated Data Validation: Implement automated data quality checks to identify and rectify errors at the source, minimizing downstream issues.
Data Lineage Tracking: Track the flow of data throughout the ecosystem, ensuring transparency and facilitating root cause analysis for errors.
5. Cultivate a Data-Driven Mindset:
Metrics-Driven Performance Management: Align KPIs and performance metrics with data-driven insights to ensure actionable decision making.
Data Storytelling Workshops: Equip stakeholders with the skills to translate complex data findings into compelling narratives that drive action.
Benefits of a Precise Ecosystem:
Sharpened Focus: Precise access and clear roles ensure everyone works with the most relevant data, maximizing efficiency.
Actionable Insights: Strategic analytics and automated quality checks lead to more reliable and actionable data insights.
Continuous Improvement: Data-driven performance management fosters a culture of learning and continuous improvement.
Sustainable Growth: Empowered by data, organizations can make informed decisions to drive sustainable growth and innovation.
By focusing on these precise actions, organizations can create an empowered data analytics ecosystem that delivers real value by driving data-driven decisions and maximizing the return on their data investment.
As Europe's leading economic powerhouse and the fourth-largest hashtag#economy globally, Germany stands at the forefront of innovation and industrial might. Renowned for its precision engineering and high-tech sectors, Germany's economic structure is heavily supported by a robust service industry, accounting for approximately 68% of its GDP. This economic clout and strategic geopolitical stance position Germany as a focal point in the global cyber threat landscape.
In the face of escalating global tensions, particularly those emanating from geopolitical disputes with nations like hashtag#Russia and hashtag#China, hashtag#Germany has witnessed a significant uptick in targeted cyber operations. Our analysis indicates a marked increase in hashtag#cyberattack sophistication aimed at critical infrastructure and key industrial sectors. These attacks range from ransomware campaigns to hashtag#AdvancedPersistentThreats (hashtag#APTs), threatening national security and business integrity.
🔑 Key findings include:
🔍 Increased frequency and complexity of cyber threats.
🔍 Escalation of state-sponsored and criminally motivated cyber operations.
🔍 Active dark web exchanges of malicious tools and tactics.
Our comprehensive report delves into these challenges, using a blend of open-source and proprietary data collection techniques. By monitoring activity on critical networks and analyzing attack patterns, our team provides a detailed overview of the threats facing German entities.
This report aims to equip stakeholders across public and private sectors with the knowledge to enhance their defensive strategies, reduce exposure to cyber risks, and reinforce Germany's resilience against cyber threats.
Chatty Kathy - UNC Bootcamp Final Project Presentation - Final Version - 5.23...John Andrews
SlideShare Description for "Chatty Kathy - UNC Bootcamp Final Project Presentation"
Title: Chatty Kathy: Enhancing Physical Activity Among Older Adults
Description:
Discover how Chatty Kathy, an innovative project developed at the UNC Bootcamp, aims to tackle the challenge of low physical activity among older adults. Our AI-driven solution uses peer interaction to boost and sustain exercise levels, significantly improving health outcomes. This presentation covers our problem statement, the rationale behind Chatty Kathy, synthetic data and persona creation, model performance metrics, a visual demonstration of the project, and potential future developments. Join us for an insightful Q&A session to explore the potential of this groundbreaking project.
Project Team: Jay Requarth, Jana Avery, John Andrews, Dr. Dick Davis II, Nee Buntoum, Nam Yeongjin & Mat Nicholas
StarCompliance is a leading firm specializing in the recovery of stolen cryptocurrency. Our comprehensive services are designed to assist individuals and organizations in navigating the complex process of fraud reporting, investigation, and fund recovery. We combine cutting-edge technology with expert legal support to provide a robust solution for victims of crypto theft.
Our Services Include:
Reporting to Tracking Authorities:
We immediately notify all relevant centralized exchanges (CEX), decentralized exchanges (DEX), and wallet providers about the stolen cryptocurrency. This ensures that the stolen assets are flagged as scam transactions, making it impossible for the thief to use them.
Assistance with Filing Police Reports:
We guide you through the process of filing a valid police report. Our support team provides detailed instructions on which police department to contact and helps you complete the necessary paperwork within the critical 72-hour window.
Launching the Refund Process:
Our team of experienced lawyers can initiate lawsuits on your behalf and represent you in various jurisdictions around the world. They work diligently to recover your stolen funds and ensure that justice is served.
At StarCompliance, we understand the urgency and stress involved in dealing with cryptocurrency theft. Our dedicated team works quickly and efficiently to provide you with the support and expertise needed to recover your assets. Trust us to be your partner in navigating the complexities of the crypto world and safeguarding your investments.
Opendatabay - Open Data Marketplace.pptxOpendatabay
Opendatabay.com unlocks the power of data for everyone. Open Data Marketplace fosters a collaborative hub for data enthusiasts to explore, share, and contribute to a vast collection of datasets.
First ever open hub for data enthusiasts to collaborate and innovate. A platform to explore, share, and contribute to a vast collection of datasets. Through robust quality control and innovative technologies like blockchain verification, opendatabay ensures the authenticity and reliability of datasets, empowering users to make data-driven decisions with confidence. Leverage cutting-edge AI technologies to enhance the data exploration, analysis, and discovery experience.
From intelligent search and recommendations to automated data productisation and quotation, Opendatabay AI-driven features streamline the data workflow. Finding the data you need shouldn't be a complex. Opendatabay simplifies the data acquisition process with an intuitive interface and robust search tools. Effortlessly explore, discover, and access the data you need, allowing you to focus on extracting valuable insights. Opendatabay breaks new ground with a dedicated, AI-generated, synthetic datasets.
Leverage these privacy-preserving datasets for training and testing AI models without compromising sensitive information. Opendatabay prioritizes transparency by providing detailed metadata, provenance information, and usage guidelines for each dataset, ensuring users have a comprehensive understanding of the data they're working with. By leveraging a powerful combination of distributed ledger technology and rigorous third-party audits Opendatabay ensures the authenticity and reliability of every dataset. Security is at the core of Opendatabay. Marketplace implements stringent security measures, including encryption, access controls, and regular vulnerability assessments, to safeguard your data and protect your privacy.
5. Executive
Summary
The American Public Power Association presents the ninth annual report on current
and imminent electricity generation capacity in America by types of fuel, location, and
ownership type.
Currently, America has just over 1.1 million megawatts of generation capacity.
The largest fuel source is natural gas, accounting for nearly 42 percent of all generation
capacity. Coal, with a share of nearly 28 percent of capacity, is the second largest
generation source. Nuclear, hydro, and wind together account for 23 percent of
capacity. Solar currently constitutes less than one percent of all capacity.
This report analyzes prospective generation capacity in four categories — under
construction, permitted, application pending, and proposed.
Nearly 372,000 MW of new generation capacity is under development in the United
States — 92,000 MW under construction or permitted, and just under 280,000 MW
proposed or pending application.
Natural gas will continue to be the top fuel source in the near and distant future,
followed by wind. A growing amount of generating capacity is expected to be fueled
by solar. In fact, solar constitutes just over 10 percent of all capacity for plants under
construction and that have permits to start building.
While the Southeast has the most generation currently, with 25 percent of the nation’s
total capacity, the Western region is slated to add the most generation, projecting more
than 144,000 MW new capacity.
This report also provides information on retirements and planned retirements,
cancellations, and capacity that has been added over the past eight years.
The report approximates what the U.S. capacity mix will look like by the end of 2020.
Natural gas will continue to be the leading resource.
While the overall capacity mix in the United States will change, it will do so at a gradual
pace. Coal and other traditional forms of electric generation are being displaced by
wind, solar, and other forms of renewable generation. Environmental regulations as well
as the speed at which certain resources can be developed might spur more significant
changes. However, the overall fuel mix five years from now will not be dramatically
different from the current mix.
Source: Data analyzed for this report was taken from the Ventyx Velocity Suite database, accessed
January 2015.
Natural Gas
41.88%
Coal
27.81%
Other
6.33%
Nuclear
9.21%
Hydro
8.42%
Wind
5.44%
Solar 0.91%
2015 Generation
Capacity
2020 Potential
Generation Capacity
Natural Gas
43.04%
Coal
24.27%
Nuclear
9.35%
Hydro
8.15%
Other
6.08%
Solar1.66%
Wind
7.45%
6. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 1
Section 1
Current Generation Capacity
TABLE 1.1 shows the sources from which electricity
is currently generated in America. Current nameplate
capacity includes capacity labeled as standby, but not
mothballed or out of service.
TABLE 1.1
2015 Current Electricity Generation
Capacity, by Fuel Type
Primary Fuel Type Current Nameplate
Capacity (MW) Share
Natural Gas ....................................489,327.93 ...............41.88%
Coal...............................................324,908.24 ...............27.81%
Nuclear ..........................................107,548.64 .................9.21%
Hydro...............................................98,381.72 .................8.42%
Wind................................................63,588.62 .................5.44%
Distillate Fuel Oil...............................25,030.22 .................2.14%
Residual Fuel Oil...............................18,401.80 .................1.58%
Solar................................................10,595.40 .................0.91%
Wood .................................................4,988.27 .................0.43%
Wood Waste Liquids............................4,790.95 .................0.41%
Geothermal ........................................3,869.45 .................0.33%
Petroleum Coke .................................2,774.20 .................0.24%
Waste ................................................2,697.75 .................0.23%
Landfill Gas ........................................2,561.60 .................0.22%
Kerosene............................................2,185.70 .................0.19%
Other Gas...........................................2,042.80 .................0.17%
Waste Heat.........................................1,131.11 .................0.10%
Blast Furnace Gas..................................929.60 .................0.08%
Jet Fuel Oil............................................537.94 .................0.05%
Purchased Steam...................................419.40 .................0.04%
Agricultural Byproduct............................392.50 .................0.03%
Other ....................................................383.24 .................0.03%
Biomass Gas .........................................354.51 .................0.03%
Biomass Solid........................................220.86 .................0.02%
Biomass Liquid ......................................126.69 .................0.01%
Oil Other................................................119.91 .................0.01%
Biomass Other...........................................5.96 .................0.00%
Multi-fuel...................................................4.00 .................0.00%
Propane ....................................................1.63 .................0.00%
Total 1,168,320.63 100.00%
Natural Gas
41.88%
Coal
27.81%
Other
6.33%
Nuclear
9.21%
Hydro
8.42%
Wind
5.44%
Solar 0.91%
7. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 2
TABLE 1.2 shows how America’s current generation
capacity is distributed through the various regions
defined by the North American Electric Reliability
Corporation.
TABLE 1.2
2015 Current Electricity Generation
Capacity, by Region
Region* Nameplate Capacity (MW) Share
SERC .............................................300,748.59 .................25.7%
RFC................................................248,602.41 .................21.3%
WECC ............................................224,848.06 .................19.2%
ERCOT ...........................................101,404.30 ...................8.7%
NPCC...............................................82,326.60 ...................7.0%
SPP..................................................72,112.04 ...................6.2%
MRO ................................................66,759.84 ...................5.7%
FRCC ...............................................65,696.33 ...................5.6%
HCC...................................................2,923.05 ...................0.3%
ASCC.................................................2,899.41 ...................0.2%
Total 1,168,320.63 100.0%
* Regions Defined by NERC
ASCC: Alaska Systems Coordinating Council
(not shown on map)
FRCC: Florida Reliability Coordinating Council
HCC: Hawaii Coordinating Council (not shown on map)
NPCC: Northeast Power Coordinating Council
MRO: Midwest Reliability Organization
RFC: Reliability First Corporation
SERC: Southeastern Electric Reliability Council
SPP: Southwest Power Pool
TRE: Texas Reliability Entity
WECC: Western Electricity Coordinating Council
8. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 3
As seen in TABLE 1.3, over 177,000 MW of current
generation capacity was added between 2008 and
2014. Nearly three-quarters of this new capacity is
fueled by natural gas or wind, with another 12 percent
coming from coal.
TABLE 1.3
Generation Capacity Additions,
2008 – 2014
Primary Fuel Type Nameplate Share
Capacity (MW)
Natural Gas ......................................74,874.56..................42.2%
Wind................................................56,641.15..................31.9%
Coal.................................................20,557.70..................11.6%
Solar................................................11,087.53....................6.2%
Hydro.................................................5,962.82....................3.4%
Wood .................................................1,420.47....................0.8%
Landfill Gas ........................................1,136.34....................0.6%
Petroleum Coke ..................................1,048.20....................0.6%
Other Gas...........................................1,020.10....................0.6%
Geothermal............................................787.29....................0.4%
Distillate Fuel Oil....................................753.22....................0.4%
Waste Heat............................................501.29....................0.3%
Wood Waste Liquid ................................478.30....................0.3%
Kerosene...............................................440.00....................0.2%
Blast Furnace Gas..................................171.00....................0.1%
Biomass Gas .........................................165.67....................0.1%
Biomass Solid........................................124.98....................0.1%
Biomass Liquid ......................................124.09....................0.1%
Residual Fuel Oil......................................42.00....................0.0%
Waste ...................................................36.10....................0.0%
Agricultural Byproduct..............................23.02....................0.0%
Other ....................................................10.70....................0.0%
Biomass Other.........................................10.56....................0.0%
Other Oil....................................................9.20....................0.0%
Jet Fuel ....................................................5.20....................0.0%
Propane ....................................................1.63....................0.0%
Purchased Steam.......................................1.00....................0.0%
Total 177,434.11
Natural Gas
42.2%
Coal
11.6%
Other
4.7%
Hydro
3.4%
Wind
31.9%
Solar
6.2%
9. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 4
TABLE 1.4 shows that in 2014 alone, over 17,000 MW
of generation began operating, with natural gas, wind,
and solar accounting for 83 percent of the new capacity.
TABLE 1.4
Generation Capacity Additions,
2014
Primary Fuel Type Nameplate Share
Capacity (MW)
Natural Gas ........................................6,651.87..................38.2%
Wind..................................................4,932.94..................28.4%
Solar..................................................2,865.74..................16.5%
Hydro.................................................1,397.00....................8.0%
Other Gas..............................................839.80....................4.8%
Coal......................................................266.20....................1.5%
Wood ....................................................111.50....................0.6%
Landfill Gas .............................................92.61....................0.5%
Geothermal..............................................84.50....................0.5%
Wood Waste Liquids.................................80.60....................0.5%
Distillate Fuel Oil......................................48.05....................0.3%
Biomass Gas ...........................................10.15....................0.1%
Other ......................................................6.50....................0.0%
Waste Heat................................................5.00....................0.0%
Biomass Other...........................................2.80....................0.0%
Biomass Solid............................................1.30....................0.0%
Purchased Steam.......................................1.00....................0.0%
Total 17,397.57 100.0%
Natural Gas
38.2%
Coal
1.5%
Other
7.4%
Hydro
8%
Wind
28.4%
Solar
16.5%
10. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 5
FIGURE 1.1 shows capacity additions between 2008 and 2014, with the fuel mix installed. With the exception of
2012, natural gas has been the leading fuel source added each year, and often by a fairly wide margin. Of note is the
growth in solar capacity added —from 80 MW in 2008 to 2,866 MW in 2014.
FIGURE 1.1
New Generation Installed, 2008-2014
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
MWCapacity
New Generation Installed, 2008-2014
Other
Hydro
Solar
Coal
Wind
Natural Gas
11. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 6
TABLE 2.1
Plants Under Construction, Fuel Type
Primary Fuel Type Capacity (MW) Share
Natural Gas ......................................18,741.69..................43.0%
Wind................................................14,685.70..................33.7%
Nuclear ..............................................5,737.90..................13.2%
Solar..................................................2,847.65....................6.5%
Hydro....................................................428.68....................1.0%
Coal......................................................320.00....................0.7%
Waste ...................................................278.20....................0.6%
Other .................................................105.00....................0.2%
Wood ......................................................88.56....................0.2%
Biomass Solid..........................................77.50....................0.2%
Wood Waste Liquids.................................62.00....................0.1%
Distillate Fuel Oil......................................37.50....................0.1%
Waste Heat..............................................37.23....................0.1%
Landfill Gas .............................................33.30....................0.1%
Geothermal..............................................30.18....................0.1%
Other Gas................................................17.00....................0.0%
Refuse ....................................................15.79....................0.0%
Biomass Gas .............................................5.60....................0.0%
Biomass Other...........................................1.60....................0.0%
Total 43,551.06 100.0%
Section 2
Future Generating Capacity:
Fuel Mix
Tables 2.1 – 2.4 show the fuel makeup of America’s
future generation capacity.
TABLE 2.1 shows the sources for the 43,551 MW of
generation capacity under construction. Natural gas
and wind account for over three-quarters of the capac-
ity under construction. Three major nuclear operations
in the Southeast account for all nuclear capacity under
construction.
Natural Gas
43%
Coal
0.7%
Other
1.9%
Hydro
1%
Wind
33.7%
Solar
6.5%
Nuclear
13.2%
12. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 7
TABLE 2.2 shows the fuel makeup for plants that have
received permits to construct 48,551 MW of capacity
overall but that have not yet started construction.
Natural gas is the leading resource choice for permitted
plants, accounting for over half of the new capacity.
Wind is second and accounts for nearly a quarter of
potential capacity.
TABLE 2.2
Permitted Plants, Fuel Type
Primary Fuel Type Capacity (MW) Share
Natural Gas ......................................25,024.50..................51.5%
Wind................................................11,901.28..................24.5%
Solar..................................................6,517.65..................13.4%
Coal...................................................2,855.00....................5.9%
Geothermal............................................740.90....................1.5%
Other ....................................................587.00....................1.2%
Hydro....................................................477.74....................1.0%
Wood ....................................................298.90....................0.6%
Biomass Gas ...........................................50.00....................0.1%
Agricultural Byproduct..............................49.90....................0.1%
Distillate Fuel Oil......................................26.00....................0.1%
Waste .....................................................12.00....................0.0%
Landfill Gas .............................................10.31....................0.0%
Total 48,551.18 100.0%
TABLE 2.3
Pending Application Plants, Fuel Type
Primary Fuel Type Capacity (MW) Share
Natural Gas ......................................32,246.37..................40.5%
Solar................................................15,269.13..................19.2%
Nuclear ............................................12,516.00..................15.7%
Wind................................................11,067.91..................13.9%
Hydro.................................................5,923.00....................7.4%
Coal...................................................1,417.00....................1.8%
Geothermal............................................408.00....................0.5%
Waste Heat............................................361.00....................0.5%
Wood ....................................................194.30....................0.2%
Waste .....................................................69.80....................0.1%
Liquefied Natural Gas...............................50.63....................0.1%
Agricultural Byproduct..............................50.00....................0.1%
Landfill Gas .............................................33.33....................0.0%
Distillate Fuel Oil......................................11.00....................0.0%
Biomass Solid............................................5.00....................0.0%
Total 79,622.47 100.0%
TABLE 2.3 shows the fuel mix for the 79,622 MW of
capacity awaiting approval of applications. Natural
gas is the leading resource choice, accounting for over
40 percent of the capacity. Solar is second, accounting
for 19 percent of the capacity.
13. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 8
TABLE 2.4
Proposed Plants, Fuel Type
Primary Fuel Type Capacity (MW) Share
Wind................................................65,986.98..................32.9%
Natural Gas ......................................44,194.86..................22.1%
Hydro...............................................33,919.32..................16.9%
Solar................................................30,292.19..................15.1%
Nuclear ............................................15,955.00....................8.0%
Coal...................................................4,545.00....................2.3%
Geothermal.........................................1,834.70....................0.9%
Wood .................................................1,019.48....................0.5%
Residual Fuel Oil....................................632.40....................0.3%
Blast Furnace Gas..................................600.00....................0.3%
Other ....................................................338.59....................0.2%
Waste ...................................................282.80....................0.1%
Landfill Gas ...........................................163.14....................0.1%
Biomass Solid........................................128.63....................0.1%
Waste Heat............................................120.00....................0.1%
Biomass Gas ...........................................63.92....................0.0%
Jet Fuel...................................................60.00....................0.0%
Distillate Fuel Oil......................................53.95....................0.0%
Biomass Other.........................................53.60....................0.0%
Agricultural Byproduct..............................19.44....................0.0%
Biomass Liquid ..........................................9.00....................0.0%
Total 200,272.98 100.0%
TABLE 2.4 shows the resource mix for the 200,273 MW of capacity still in the planning
stages. This is the earliest and most uncertain stage of development, and includes
units that are least likely to be built. Wind power accounts for approximately one-third
of planned capacity with natural gas, hydro, and solar accounting for the bulk of the
remaining capacity.
Natural Gas
22.1%
Coal
2.3%
Other
2.7%
Nuclear
8%
Hydro
16.9%
Wind
32.9%
Solar
15.1%
14. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 9
FIGURE 3.1 tracks the major fuel sources in each stage
of development. Natural gas is the dominant fuel choice
in the first three stages — under construction, permitted,
and pending application. Wind becomes dominant in the
proposed capacity stage. Figure 1 also shows that the
resource mix is more balanced in the earlier stages of
development.
Section 3
Future Generating Capacity:
Development Stages
FIGURE 3.1
Share of Fuel Type: Stage of Development, 2015
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Under
Construc5on
Permi9ed
Pending
Applica5on
Proposed
Percent
Share
Share
of
Fuel
Type:
Stage
of
Development,
2015
Coal
Natural
Gas
Nuclear
Wind
Hydro
Solar
Other
15. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 10
FIGURES 3.2 – 3.5 demonstrate how the fuel mix outlook has changed from 2007 to 2015.
FIGURE 3.2
Share of Fuel Type: Plants Under Construction, 2007-2015
FIGURE 3.2 shows the capacity under construction. The most notable development
is the steep decline in coal under construction — from over 40 percent in 2009 to just
above 1 percent in 2014. Wind capacity under construction has increased from
12 percent in 2007 to over 34 percent in 2015. Natural gas has been by far the most
popular resource in the under construction category from 2007 to 2015.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
PercentShare
Figure 3.2
Share of Fuel Type: Plants Under Construction,
2007-2015
Coal
Natural Gas
Nuclear
Wind
Hydro
Solar
Other
16. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 11
FIGURE 3.3
Share of Fuel Type: Permitted Plants, 2007-2015
FIGURES 3.3 – 3.4 track fuel types in the permitted and pending application categories,
which show some major fluctuations in the first few years and then become relatively
steady. Coal has declined precipitously — from 50 percent to 6 percent in the
permitted category, and from 48 percent to 2 percent in the application pending
category.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
PercentShare
Figure 3.3
Share of Fuel Type: Permitted Plants, 2007-2015
Coal
Natural Gas
Nuclear
Wind
Hydro
Solar
Other
17. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 12
FIGURE 3.4
Share of Fuel Type: Application Pending, 2007-2015
As seen in FIGURE 3.4, the fuel mix in the application pending category varies most
widely, with different fuels like wind, solar, and nuclear emerging in recent years.
18. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 13
FIGURE 3.5
Share of Fuel Type: Proposed Plants, 2007-2015
FIGURE 3.5 shows the steep decline in coal for proposed plants, paralleled by the
growth in wind, solar, and natural gas.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
PercentShare
Figure 3.5
Share of Fuel Type: Proposed Plants, 2007-2015
Coal
Natural Gas
Nuclear
Wind
Hydro
Solar
Other
19. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 14
TABLE 4.1 shows that four regions account for roughly
three-quarters of the capacity under construction.
TABLE 4.1
Plants Under Construction, by Region
Region* Capacity (MW) Share
SERC .................................................9,046.83..................20.8%
RFC....................................................8,049.93..................18.5%
WECC ................................................7,786.19..................17.9%
ERCOT ...............................................7,236.29..................16.6%
SPP....................................................4,348.25..................10.0%
MRO ..................................................3,748.10....................8.6%
FRCC .................................................2,591.03....................5.9%
ASCC....................................................333.50....................0.8%
NPCC....................................................329.80....................0.8%
HCC........................................................81.14....................0.2%
Total 43,551.06 100.0%
Section 4
Future Generating Capacity:
Regional Mix
TABLES 4.1 – 4.4 show where the new plants are
being built or planned for construction by North
American Electric Reliability Corporation regions.
(See Appendix 1 for definition of regions and included
states and Appendix 2 for the fuel mix for each region.)
* Regions Defined by NERC
ASCC: Alaska Systems Coordinating
Council (not shown on map)
FRCC: Florida Reliability Coordinating Council
HCC: Hawaii Coordinating Council
(not shown on map)
NPCC: Northeast Power Coordinating Council
MRO: Midwest Reliability Organization
RFC: Reliability First Corporation
SERC: Southeastern Electric Reliability
Council
SPP: Southwest Power Pool
TRE: Texas Reliability Entity
WECC: Western Electricity Coordinating
Council
20. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 15
TABLE 4.2 shows that the Western Electricity Coordinat-
ing Council region has over 30 percent of the permitted
capacity.
TABLE 4.2
Permitted Plants, by Region
Region* Capacity (MW) Share
WECC ..............................................17,142.83..................35.3%
ERCOT .............................................12,027.60..................24.8%
RFC....................................................4,974.50..................10.2%
SERC .................................................4,429.67....................9.1%
NPCC.................................................4,368.97....................9.0%
MRO ..................................................2,549.40....................5.3%
SPP....................................................2,093.80....................4.3%
FRCC ....................................................593.00....................1.2%
ASCC....................................................339.70....................0.7%
HCC........................................................31.72....................0.1%
Total 48,551.19 100.0%
* Regions Defined by NERC
ASCC: Alaska Systems Coordinating
Council (not shown on map)
FRCC: Florida Reliability Coordinating Council
HCC: Hawaii Coordinating Council
(not shown on map)
NPCC: Northeast Power Coordinating Council
MRO: Midwest Reliability Organization
RFC: Reliability First Corporation
SERC: Southeastern Electric Reliability
Council
SPP: Southwest Power Pool
TRE: Texas Reliability Entity
WECC: Western Electricity Coordinating
Council
21. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 16
TABLES 4.3 and 4.4 show plants in the pending
application and proposed categories, in both of which
WECC has far more potential capacity than any other
region.
TABLE 4.3
Pending Application Plants,
by Region
Region* Capacity (MW) Share
WECC ..............................................34,329.53..................43.1%
ERCOT .............................................17,377.22..................21.8%
RFC..................................................12,415.60..................15.6%
SERC .................................................6,856.88....................8.6%
NPCC.................................................4,002.67....................5.0%
FRCC .................................................3,060.00....................3.8%
MRO ..................................................1,052.04....................1.3%
SPP.......................................................261.80....................0.3%
HCC......................................................197.93....................0.2%
ASCC......................................................68.80....................0.1%
Total 79,622.47 100.0%
TABLE 4.4
Proposed Plants, by Region
Region* Capacity (MW) Share
WECC ..............................................85,699.61..................42.8%
RFC..................................................29,539.95..................14.7%
SERC ...............................................24,666.25..................12.3%
MRO ................................................15,977.90....................8.0%
ERCOT .............................................14,445.20....................7.2%
SPP..................................................11,611.20....................5.8%
NPCC.................................................8,893.43....................4.4%
FRCC .................................................5,238.92....................2.6%
ASCC.................................................3,505.04....................1.8%
HCC......................................................695.48....................0.3%
Total 200,272.98 100.0%
* Regions Defined by NERC
ASCC: Alaska Systems Coordinating
Council (not shown on map)
FRCC: Florida Reliability Coordinating Council
HCC: Hawaii Coordinating Council
(not shown on map)
NPCC: Northeast Power Coordinating Council
MRO: Midwest Reliability Organization
RFC: Reliability First Corporation
SERC: Southeastern Electric Reliability
Council
SPP: Southwest Power Pool
TRE: Texas Reliability Entity
WECC: Western Electricity Coordinating
Council
22. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 17
TABLES 4.5 and 4.6 show the fuels of choice for proposed capacity by development stage.
As seen in TABLE 4.5, for plants most certain to be built — those already under construction or permitted — natural
gas and wind account for over 76 percent of the capacity, with solar contributing another 10 percent.
Nearly half of the capacity under construction and permitted is in WECC and Electric Reliability Council of Texas
regions, with another 28.7 percent in Reliability First Corporation and Southeastern Electric Reliability Council regions.
Natural gas is the primary resource in the ERCOT and RFC regions as well as in the Florida Reliability Coordinating
Council and Northeast Power Coordinating Council regions. In each of these four regions, natural gas accounts for at
least two-thirds of future capacity.
There is a general increase in planned solar capacity. Just under 88 percent of solar capacity in the permitted and
under construction stages is located in the WECC region. Four regions account for nearly 85 percent of new wind
capacity — ERCOT and WECC as well as the Midwest Reliability Organization and Southwest Power Pool regions.
TABLE 4.5
Plants Under Construction and
Permitted, by Fuel Type
Primary Fuel Type Capacity (MW) Share
Natural Gas ......................................43,766.19..................47.5%
Wind................................................26,586.98..................28.9%
Solar..................................................9,365.29..................10.2%
Nuclear ..............................................5,737.90....................6.2%
Coal...................................................3,175.00....................3.4%
Hydro....................................................906.42....................1.0%
Geothermal............................................771.08....................0.8%
Other ....................................................692.00....................0.8%
Wood ....................................................387.46....................0.4%
Waste ...................................................290.20....................0.3%
Biomass Solid..........................................77.50....................0.1%
Distillate Fuel Oil......................................63.50....................0.1%
Wood Waste Liquids.................................62.00....................0.1%
Biomass Gas ...........................................55.60....................0.1%
Agricultural Byproduct..............................49.90....................0.1%
Landfill Gas .............................................43.61....................0.0%
Waste Heat..............................................37.23....................0.0%
Other Gas................................................17.00....................0.0%
Refuse ....................................................15.79....................0.0%
Biomass Other...........................................1.60....................0.0%
Total 92,102.24 100.0%
Natural Gas
47.5%
Coal
3.4%
Other
2.8%
Hydro
1%
Wind
28.9%
Solar
10.2%
Nuclear
6.2%
23. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 18
As seen in TABLE 4.6, for plants in the more distant future — those that are proposed or pending application —
the fuel mix tends more toward wind and other renewable resources, compared to plants that are scheduled to
come online in the near future. There is almost as much natural gas capacity as wind in these stages.
TABLE 4.6
Proposed and Application Pending
Plants, by Fuel Type
Primary Fuel Type Capacity (MW) Share
Wind................................................77,054.89..................27.5%
Natural Gas ......................................76,441.23..................27.3%
Solar................................................45,561.32..................16.3%
Hydro...............................................39,842.31..................14.2%
Nuclear ............................................28,471.00..................10.2%
Coal...................................................5,962.00....................2.1%
Geothermal.........................................2,242.70....................0.8%
Wood .................................................1,213.78....................0.4%
Residual Fuel Oil....................................632.40....................0.2%
Blast Furnace Gas..................................600.00....................0.2%
Waste Heat............................................481.00....................0.2%
Waste ...................................................352.60....................0.1%
Other ....................................................338.59....................0.1%
Landfill Gas ...........................................196.47....................0.1%
Biomass Solid........................................133.63....................0.0%
Distillate Fuel Oil......................................64.95....................0.0%
Biomass Gas ...........................................63.92....................0.0%
Agricultural Byproduct..............................63.14....................0.0%
Jet Fuel...................................................60.00....................0.0%
Biomass Other.........................................53.60....................0.0%
Liquefied Natural Gas...............................50.63....................0.0%
Biomass Liquid ..........................................9.00....................0.0%
Total 279,889.15 100.0%
Wind is slated to account for twenty percent or more of new capacity in all but the Alaska and Florida regions and is
the leading resource in four regions. Nearly 83 percent of the proposed or application pending solar capacity is locat-
ed in WECC, a region that accounts for much of the future renewable capacity, and for nearly half of all capacity in
the proposed and application pending stages. Other forms of renewable energy, particularly wood, waste, and waste
heat, are more dispersed through the various regions.
Natural Gas
27.3%
Coal
2.1%
Other
2.4%
Hydro
14.2%
Wind
27.5%
Solar
16.3%
Nuclear
10.2%
24. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 19
Section 5
Future Generating Capacity:
Ownership Type
Analysis of future generation capacity by ownership
is summarized in Tables 5.1 – 5.4.
TABLE 5.1 shows that for plants under construction,
most of the capacity is owned by non-utility generators,
while regulated utilities collectively account for over
40 percent of the capacity.
TABLE 5.1
Plants Under Construction,
by Ownership
Utility Type Capacity (MW) Share
Investor Owned.................................11,052.99..................25.4%
Public Power ......................................4,597.56..................10.6%
Federal...............................................1,290.40....................3.0%
Co-op....................................................979.18....................2.2%
Regulated Total..............................17,920.13..................41.1%
Non-utility Generators .......................25,630.93..................58.9%
Total 43,551.06 100.0%
TABLE 5.2
Permitted Plants, by Ownership
Ownership Capacity (MW) Share
Investor Owned ..................................2,172.67 ...................4.5%
Co-op.................................................1,915.00 ...................3.9%
Public Power ......................................1,179.60 ...................2.4%
Federal....................................................15.00 ...................0.0%
Regulated Total................................5,282.27..................10.9%
Non-utility Generators .......................43,268.92..................89.1%
Total 48,551.19 100.0%
Public Power
10.6%
Co-op 2.2%
Federal 3%
Non-utility
Generators
58.9%
Investor
Owned
25.4%
Public Power
2.4%
Co-op 3.9%
Non-utility
Generators
89.1%
Investor
Owned
4.5%
25. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 20
TABLE 5.3
Pending Application Plants,
by Ownership
Ownership Capacity (MW) Share
Investor Owned...................................9,368.13 .................14.1%
Co-op.................................................2,148.47 ...................3.2%
Public Power ......................................1,571.59 ...................2.4%
Federal....................................................11.00 ...................0.0%
Regulated Total..............................13,099.20 .................16.5%
Non-utility Generators .......................66,523.28 .................83.5%
Total 79,622.47 100.0%
Of note in TABLE 5.4 is that for proposed plants,
generation owned by public power has the largest
share of capacity among utilities.
TABLES 5.2 – 5.4 show that non-utility generators
account for significant capacity in the earlier stages
of development.
TABLE 5.4
Proposed Plants, by Ownership
Ownership Capacity (MW) Share
Public Power ....................................12,375.95 ...................6.2%
Investor Owned.................................10,897.47 ...................5.4%
Federal...............................................4,940.50 ...................2.5%
Co-op.................................................2,869.67 ...................1.4%
Regulated Total..............................31,083.59 .................15.5%
Non-utility Generators .....................169,189.40 .................84.5%
Total 200,272.98 100.0%
Public Power
6.2%
Co-op 1.4%
Federal 2.5%
Non-utility
Generators
84.5%
Investor Owned
5.4%
Public Power
2.4%
Co-op
3.2%
Non-utility
Generators
83.5%
Investor
Owned
14.1%
26. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 21
Section 6
Generating Capacity:
Retirements and Cancellations
TABLES 6.1 and 6.2 show generation capacity retire-
ments by fuel type between 2008 and 2014, when just
over 66,000 MW of capacity was retired. Over 77 per-
cent of this retired capacity was natural gas or coal, and
14 percent was oil. More than 84 percent of the retired
natural gas capacity used steam turbines.
TABLE 6.1
Retired Plants by Fuel Type,
2008-2014
Primary Fuel Type Capacity (MW) Share
Coal.................................................27,717.50..................41.6%
Natural Gas ......................................23,487.80..................35.2%
Residual Fuel Oil.................................6,308.10....................9.5%
Nuclear ..............................................3,781.47....................5.7%
Distillate Fuel Oil.................................3,022.79....................4.5%
Hydro....................................................938.25....................1.4%
Petroleum Coke .....................................323.50....................0.5%
Wood Waste Liquid ................................187.30....................0.3%
Blast Furnace Gas..................................171.20....................0.3%
Wood ..................................................166.80....................0.3%
Landfill Gas ...........................................150.20....................0.2%
Wind.....................................................133.60....................0.2%
Other ....................................................67.00....................0.1%
Waste .....................................................44.70....................0.1%
Geothermal..............................................40.20....................0.1%
Other Gas................................................37.50....................0.1%
Purchased Steam.....................................37.00....................0.1%
Jet Fuel...................................................17.40....................0.0%
Biomass Liquid ........................................15.80....................0.0%
Biomass Gas .............................................7.00....................0.0%
Solar.........................................................3.50....................0.0%
Other Oil....................................................3.00....................0.0%
Total 66,661.61 100.0%
Natural Gas
35.2%
Coal
41.6%
Nuclear
5.7%
Hydro
1.4%
Wind
0.2% Other
15.9%
27. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 22
TABLE 6.2
Retired Plants by Fuel Type, 2014
Primary Fuel Capacity (MW) Share
Coal...................................................4,509.60 .................61.4%
Natural Gas ........................................1,534.30 .................20.9%
Residual Fuel Oil....................................490.50 ...................6.7%
Distillate Fuel Oil....................................254.95 ...................3.5%
Hydro....................................................212.50 ...................2.9%
Petroleum Coke .....................................184.00 ...................2.5%
Wood Waste Liquids.................................88.70 ...................1.2%
Wind.......................................................63.60 ...................0.9%
Landfill Gas .............................................10.60 ...................0.1%
Jet Fuel.....................................................1.20 ...................0.0%
Total 7,349.95 100.0%
More than 7,000 MW of capacity was retired in 2014
alone, of which coal accounted for over 60 percent.
Over 54,000 MW of current operating capacity is
scheduled to retire by 2020, two-thirds of which is coal.
Almost all planned natural gas retirements are powered
by steam or gas combustion turbines.
TABLE 6.3 reflects planned retirements that have been
publicly announced.
TABLE 6.3
Planned Retirements to 2020,
by Fuel Type
Primary Fuel Type Capacity (MW) % Planned
Retirement
Capacity
Coal.................................................35,419.20 .................65.1%
Natural Gas ......................................13,987.30 .................25.7%
Residual Fuel Oil.................................1,465.20 ...................2.7%
Distillate Fuel Oil.................................1,240.70 ...................2.3%
Hydro.................................................1,018.00 ...................1.9%
Nuclear .................................................550.00 ...................1.0%
Kerosene...............................................418.50 ...................0.8%
Wind.....................................................279.35 ...................0.5%
Landfill Gas .............................................22.30 ...................0.0%
Biomass Gas .............................................3.50 ...................0.0%
Total 54,404.05 100.0%
s
Natural Gas
25.7%
Coal
65.1%
Other
5.8%Hydro
1.9%
Wind
0.5%
Nuclear
1%
28. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 23
TABLE 6.4
Plant Cancellations, 2014
Primary Fuel Type Nameplate Share
Capacity (MW)
Wind................................................28,226.05..................54.0%
Solar................................................15,749.02..................30.1%
Natural Gas ........................................3,404.77....................6.5%
Hydro.................................................2,820.42....................5.4%
Geothermal............................................902.00....................1.7%
Coal......................................................478.50....................0.9%
Waste ...................................................262.80....................0.5%
Wood ....................................................242.60....................0.5%
Landfill Gas .............................................81.44....................0.2%
Biomass Gas ...........................................49.00....................0.1%
Other Gas................................................10.00....................0.0%
Biomass Solid............................................8.60....................0.0%
Distillate Fuel Oil........................................2.98....................0.0%
Total 52,238.16 100.0%
More than 52,000 MW of planned capacity additions was canceled in 2014, nearly
triple the amount of capacity added to the grid. Wind and solar constituted 84 percent
of this canceled capacity.
29. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 24
TABLE 6.5
Plant Cancellations, 2008-2014
Primary Fuel Type Nameplate Share
Capacity (MW)
Wind 124,583.27 33.0%
Coal.................................................55,838.50..................14.8%
Natural Gas ......................................54,026.96..................14.3%
Hydro...............................................53,542.85..................14.2%
Solar................................................50,870.05..................13.5%
Nuclear ............................................23,130.00....................6.1%
Petroleum Coke ..................................5,060.20....................1.3%
Wood .................................................3,540.03....................0.9%
Geothermal.........................................1,700.00....................0.4%
Other Gas...........................................1,646.00....................0.4%
Biomass Gas ......................................1,198.05....................0.3%
Waste ...................................................716.30....................0.2%
Other ..................................................681.20....................0.2%
Biomass Gas .........................................469.60....................0.1%
Landfill Gas ...........................................327.52....................0.1%
Agricultural Byproduct............................280.32....................0.1%
Waste Heat............................................125.80....................0.0%
Biomass Gas ...........................................96.04....................0.0%
Kerosene.................................................49.20....................0.0%
Biomass Other.........................................30.00....................0.0%
Distillate Fuel Oil......................................21.98....................0.0%
Wood Waste Liquids...................................3.80....................0.0%
Total 377,937.66 100.0%
Since 2008, nearly 378,000 MW of planned capacity additions were ultimately
canceled, more than double the amount that was actually added. Wind represents
one-third of this canceled capacity. Nearly equal shares of coal, natural gas, hydro,
and solar were also canceled during this time.
Natural Gas
14.3%
Solar
13.5%
Coal
14.8%
Other
4.1%
Hydro
14.2%
Wind
33%
Nuclear
6.1%
30. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 25
FIGURE 6.1 shows additions, cancellations, and retirements from 2008 to 2014.
Natural gas is the only resource for which additions outnumber cancellations.
For all other resources, far more capacity was cancelled than was added.
FIGURE 6.1
Additions, Cancellations, and Retirements, 2008-2014
31. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 26
continued on next page
Impending environmental regulations have made coal capacity especially vulnerable to retirements, with nearly 37
gigawatts of existing capacity likely to retire by 2020.1
Some states have much more coal capacity at risk than others.
Table 6.6 shows current coal capacity and planned retirements and additions in each state.
In several states with large amounts of planned retirements, there is not a corresponding amount of capacity currently
under construction or permitted. Conversely, several states have much more capacity under development than facing
retirement.
TABLE 6.6 compares coal to planned natural gas, wind, and total capacity additions. While natural gas additions
will equal or exceed coal retirements in many states, added wind capacity will make up for coal retirements in other
states.
TABLE 6.6
Coal Retirements and Additions
State Total Current Coal Anounced Planned Planned Planned Total Planned
Capacity Capacity Coal Coal Natural Gas Wind Capacity
(MW) (MW) Retirements Additions Additions Additions Additions
(MW) (MW) (MW) (MW) (MW)
Alabama 34,408.63 11,797.20 2,594.20 62.00
Alaska 2,899.41 113.50 32.50 300.00 17.60 673.20
Arizona 31,554.59 6,690.80 1,092.00 1,050.00 51.00 2,010.30
Arkansas 16,789.69 5,287.00 1.80
California 80,610.12 238.70 115.50 4,460.20 911.10 10,933.99
Colorado 16,884.84 5,705.10 365.20 665.60 298.70 1,114.30
Connecticut 9,821.67 400.00 24.80 27.26
Delaware 3,255.94 442.40 309.20 309.20
District of Columbia 10.80 0.00
Florida 68,510.13 11,361.70 1,252.70 3,264.20 3,184.03
Georgia 42,111.66 13,444.20 2,441.90 850.00 760.00 4,105.76
Hawaii 3,027.45 203.00 112.86
Idaho 4,987.74 18.90 6.20 520.00 5.49 227.70 817.19
Illinois 51,822.09 17,355.80 1,218.40 571.00 1,202.40 1,820.66
Indiana 30,858.83 20,688.80 2,522.80 644.00 280.00 937.00
Iowa 17,263.00 7,168.41 689.80 870.00 1,557.05 2,482.05
Kansas 15,607.03 5,384.80 49.00 895.00 246.20 1,884.10 3,026.30
Kentucky 25,028.54 17,822.70 3,057.50 690.00 968.80
Louisiana 29,400.63 3,764.30 46.00 629.40 629.40
Maine 4,843.89 0.00 277.40 282.40
Maryland 13,676.60 5,139.20 1,328.40 866.00 190.00 1,219.00
Massachusetts 14,788.18 1,160.30 1,154.60 1,394.00 468.60 1,958.36
Michigan 33,485.33 12,339.90 2,429.70 143.90 134.40 279.34
Minnesota 17,933.74 5,353.90 785.50 1,274.50 1,274.50
32. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 27
1
This total includes 35,419 MW of announced coal retirements plus an additional 1,500 MW of coal capacity that Ventyx estimates is likely to
retire based on certain criteria. This does not include unannounced retirements and other coal capacity vulnerable to retirement if more stringent
regulations are put in place.
Mississippi 17,926.38 2,887.50
Missouri 23,643.37 12,878.00 365.10 27.60 31.51
Montana 6,530.70 2,676.60 240.00 255.00
Nebraska 9,378.85 4,274.00 73.50 303.90 303.90
Nevada 12,578.38 1,445.80 294.80 200.10 1,915.20
New Hampshire 4,896.07 559.20 50.00 8.55 8.55
New Jersey 20,457.76 2,003.00 2,105.00 2,171.80
New Mexico 8,811.89 3,741.20 924.00 815.00 904.07
New York 44,068.69 2,170.70 204.50 2,128.00 107.80 2,300.85
North Carolina 33,165.35 10,957.10 40.00 475.00 80.00 1,035.18
North Dakota 7,139.81 4,363.40 90.00 1,538.50 1,628.50
Ohio 34,971.12 19,498.50 3,154.80 2,754.00 1,054.29 3,811.69
Oklahoma 25,322.14 5,844.00 1,013.00 103.00, 1,713.55 1,816.55
Oregon 14,602.97 601.00 601.00 662.00 1,258.50 2,227.07
Pennsylvania 47,058.53 15,628.40 1,342.00 2,823.00 2,924.10
Rhode Island 2,074.35 0.00 45.00 45.23
South Carolina 24,579.45 6,277.70 366.00 750.00 3,019.00
South Dakota 4,242.20 456.00 402.05 402.05
Tennessee 23,923.65 9,210.70 2,511.20 1,303.50
Texas 122,043.07 25,354.80 558.00 240.00 13,924.70 6,084.40 21,186.09
Utah 8,940.77 5,218.89 296.10 5.90 140.00 545.90
Vermont 1,435.65 0.00 30.00 76.12
Virginia 28,268.67 5,890.20 593.00 1,358.00 1,391.70
Washington 31,500.66 1,459.80 729.90 267.00 417.00
West Virginia 17,213.39 15,019.93 1,802.70 52.50 110.50
Wisconsin 19,369.78 8,410.10 802.40 102.50 102.50
Wyoming 8,889.02 6,755.80 7.00 670 3,269.00 3,939.00
Total 1,172,613.18 325,462.93 36,910.90 3,175.00 44,075.39 26,511.98 92,102.24
TABLE 6.6
Coal Retirements and Additions (continued from page 26)
State Total Current Coal Anounced Planned Planned Planned Total Planned
Capacity Capacity Coal Coal Natural Gas Wind Capacity
(MW) (MW) Retirements Additions Additions Additions Additions
(MW) (MW) (MW) (MW) (MW)
33. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 28
TABLE 6.7
Net Potential Generation Capacity by 2020
TABLE 6.7 combines current operating capacity with planned capacity additions and retirements to demonstrate the
shift in electricity generation in America by 2020. This table only includes plants permitted and under construction
because proposed capacity is uncertain. Planned retirements and additions can and most likely will change.
The table shows the continued prominence of natural gas-fired generation. Solar capacity does not require as much
lead time to be developed as other fuels, so this table likely undercounts the amount of solar and wind capacity that
will be online in the future.
Primary Fuel Type Existing Percent Planned Existing Plus Planned Net Potential Percent Potential
Nameplate Capacity Added Planned Retirements Cacpacity in Increase Percent
Capacity in in 2015 Capacity Added by 2020 2020 (MW) in Capacity Capacity
2015 (MW) (MW) Capacity (MW) by 2020 in 2020
Natural Gas 489,327.93 41.88% 43,766.19 533,094.12 13,987.30 519,106.82 6.1% 43.04%
Coal 324,908.24 27.81% 3,175.00 328,083.24 35,419.20 292,664.04 -9.9% 24.27%
Nuclear 107,548.64 9.21% 5,737.90 113,286.54 550.00 112,736.54 4.8% 9.35%
Hydro 98,381.72 8.42% 906.42 99,288.14 1,018.00 98,270.14 -0.1% 8.15%
Wind 63,588.62 5.44% 26,586.98 90,175.60 279.35 89,896.25 41.4% 7.45%
Distillate Fuel Oil 25,030.22 2.14% 63.50 25,093.72 1,240.70 23,853.02 -4.7% 1.98%
Oil 18,401.80 1.58% 18,401.80 1,465.20 16,936.60 -8.0% 1.40%
Solar 10,595.40 0.91% 9,365.29 19,960.70 19,960.70 88.4% 1.66%
Wood 4,988.27 0.43% 387.46 5,375.72 5,375.72 7.8% 0.45%
Wood Waste Liquids 4,790.95 0.41% 62.00 4,852.95 4,852.95 1.3% 0.40%
Geothermal 3,869.45 0.33% 771.08 4,640.53 4,640.53 19.9% 0.38%
Petroleum Coke 2,774.20 0.24% 2,774.20 2,774.20 0.0% 0.23%
Waste 2,697.75 0.23% 290.20 2,987.95 2,987.95 10.8% 0.25%
Landfill Gas 2,561.60 0.22% 43.61 2,605.21 22.30 2,582.91 0.8% 0.21%
Kerosene 2,185.70 0.19% 2,185.70 418.50 1,767.20 -19.1% 0.15%
Other Gas 2,042.80 0.17% 17.00 2,059.80 2,059.80 0.8% 0.17%
Waste Heat 1,131.11 0.10% 37.23 1,168.34 1,168.34 3.3% 0.10%
Blast Furnace Gas 929.60 0.08% 929.60 929.60 0.0% 0.08%
Jet Fuel Oil 537.94 0.05% 537.94 537.94 0.0% 0.04%
Purchased Steam 419.40 0.04% 419.40 419.40 0.0% 0.03%
Agricultural Byproduct 392.50 0.03% 49.90 442.40 442.40 12.7% 0.04%
Other 383.24 0.03% 707.79 1,091.03 1,091.03 184.7% 0.09%
Biomass Gas 354.51 0.03% 55.60 410.11 3.50 406.61 14.7% 0.03%
Biomass Solid 220.86 0.02% 77.50 298.36 298.36 35.1% 0.02%
continued on page 29
34. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 29
Biomass Liquid 126.69 0.01% 126.69 126.69 0.0% 0.01%
Oil Other 119.91 0.01% 119.91 119.91 0.0% 0.01%
Biomass Other 5.96 0.00% 1.60 7.56 7.56 26.8% 0.00%
MultiFuel 4.00 0.00% 4.00 4.00 0.0% 0.00%
Propane 1.63 0.00% 1.63 1.63 0.0% 0.00%
Total 1,168,320.63 100.00% 92,102.24 1,260,422.87 54,404.05 1,206,018.82 3.2% 100.00%
TABLE 6.7
Net Potential Generation Capacity by 2020 (continued from page 28)
Primary Fuel Type Existing Percent Planned Existing Plus Planned Net Potential Percent Potential
Nameplate Capacity Added Planned Retirements Cacpacity in Increase Percent
Capacity in in 2015 Capacity Added by 2020 2020 (MW) in Capacity Capacity
2015 (MW) (MW) Capacity (MW) by 2020 in 2020
Natural Gas
43.04%
Coal
24.27%
Nuclear
9.35%
Hydro
8.15%
Other
6.08%
Solar
1.66%
Wind
7.45%
2020 Potential
Generation Capacity
35. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 30
The rate of new capacity additions has slowed over the
past couple of years, but the trends in new capacity
development have remained consistent. Natural gas
continues to be the leading resource for current and
future capacity, while wind and solar are making greater
inroads into the nation’s overall electricity generation
capacity.
The data on cancellations and additions illustrates that
while the overall capacity mix in the United States will
change, it will do so at a gradual pace. Coal and other
traditional forms of electric generation are being dis-
placed by wind, solar, and other forms of renewable
generation. Environmental regulations as well as the
speed at which certain resources can be developed
might spur more significant changes. However, the
overall fuel mix five years hence will not be dramatically
different from the current mix.
Section 7
Conclusion
36. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 31
Appendix 1
Regions
This report uses regions defined by the North American Electric Reliability Council:
ASCC - Alaska Systems Coordinating Council (not shown on map)
FRCC – Florida Reliability Coordinating Council
HCC – Hawaii Coordinating Council (not shown on map)
NPCC - Northeast Power Coordinating Council
MRO – Midwest Reliability Organization
RFC – Reliability First Corporation
SERC - Southeastern Electric Reliability Council
SPP – Southwest Power Pool
TRE – Texas Reliability Entity*
WECC - Western Electricity Coordinating Council
* The Independent System Operator that operates the electric grid for nearly all of the state of Texas is the
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), and is the name used for this region in the report. The Texas
Reliability Entity (TRE) monitors and enforces compliance with reliability standards for NERC.
37. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 32
ASCC Hydro 351.20 52.2% 38.7%
Natural Gas 300.00 44.6% 0.7%
Wind 17.60 2.6% 0.1%
Distillate Fuel Oil 4.40 0.7% 6.9%
Total 673.20
ERCOT Natural Gas 13,059.70 67.8% 29.8%
Wind 5,334.20 27.7% 20.1%
Other 332.00 1.7% 48.0%
Coal 240.00 1.2% 7.6%
Solar 219.20 1.1% 2.3%
Wood 63.00 0.3% 16.3%
Refuse 15.79 0.1%
Total 19,263.89
FRCC Natural Gas 2,955.00 92.8% 6.8%
Waste 95.00 3.0% 32.7%
Solar 76.50 2.4% 0.8%
Waste Heat 35.03 1.1% 94.1%
Biomass Solid 18.50 0.6% 23.9%
Biomass Gas 4.00 0.1% 7.2%
Total 3,184.03
HCC Solar 50.59 44.8% 0.5%
Biomass Solid 28.00 24.8% 36.1%
Hydro 14.72 13.0% 1.6%
Waste 12.00 10.6% 4.1%
Wood 7.56 6.7% 1.9%
Total 112.86
MRO Wind 5,282.50 83.9% 19.9%
Natural Gas 960.00 15.2% 2.2%
Hydro 55.00 0.9% 6.1%
Total 6,297.50
Permitted Plants and Plants Under Construction: Fuel Mix by Region
Region Fuel Type Capacity (MW) Share of Region’s Share of Selected Fuel’s
New Fuel Capacity Emerging Capacity
Appendix 2
Regional Fuel Mix
continued on next page
38. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 33
NPCC Natural Gas 3,522.00 75.0% 8.0%
Wind 962.15 20.5% 3.6%
Solar 99.63 2.1% 1.1%
Wood 72.00 1.5% 18.6%
Hydro 21.99 0.5% 2.4%
Waste 21.00 0.4% 7.2%
Total 4,698.77
RFC Natural Gas 10,216.10 78.4% 23.3%
Wind 2,192.09 16.8% 8.2%
Hydro 250.90 1.9% 27.7%
Waste 157.00 1.2% 54.1%
Solar 113.84 0.9% 1.2%
Other 90.00 0.7% 13.0%
Biomass Solid 3.00 0.0% 3.9%
Distillate Fuel Oil 1.50 0.0% 2.4%
Total 13,024.43
SERC Nuclear 5,737.90 42.6% 100.0%
Natural Gas 5,139.00 38.1% 11.7%
Coal 850.00 6.3% 26.8%
Wind 697.50 5.2% 2.6%
Solar 598.18 4.4% 6.4%
Wood 149.00 1.1% 38.5%
Hydro 119.12 0.9% 13.1%
Wood Waste Liquid 62.00 0.5% 100.0%
Biomass Gas 50.00 0.4% 89.9%
Landfill Gas 39.01 0.3% 89.5%
Biomass Solid 28.00 0.2% 36.1%
Waste 5.20 0.0% 1.8%
Biomass Other 1.60 0.0% 100.0%
Total 13,476.51
Permitted Plants and Plants Under Construction: Fuel Mix by Region (continued from page 32)
Region Fuel Type Capacity (MW) Share of Region’s Share of Selected Fuel’s
New Fuel Capacity Emerging Capacity
continued on next page
39. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 34
Permitted Plants and Plants Under Construction: Fuel Mix by Region (continued from page 33)
Region Fuel Type Capacity (MW) Share of Region’s Share of Selected Fuel’s
New Fuel Capacity Emerging Capacity
SPP Wind 4,862.85 75.5% 18.3%
Coal 895.00 13.9% 28.2%
Natural Gas 413.20 6.4% 0.9%
Other 270.00 4.2% 39.0%
Solar 1.00 0.0% 0.0%
Total 6,442.05
WECC Solar 8,206.36 32.9% 87.6%
Wind 7,238.10 29.0% 27.2%
Natural Gas 7,201.19 28.9% 16.5%
Coal 1,190.00 4.8% 37.5%
Geothermal 771.08 3.1% 100.0%
Wood 95.90 0.4% 24.8%
Hydro 93.50 0.4% 10.3%
Distillate Fuel Oil 57.60 0.2% 90.7%
Agricultural Byproduct 49.90 0.2% 100.0%
Other Gas 17.00 0.1% 100.0%
Landfill Gas 4.60 0.0% 10.5%
Waste Heat 2.20 0.0% 5.9%
Biomass Gas 1.60 0.0% 2.9%
Total 24,929.02
40. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 35
Proposed Plants and Plants Pending Application: Fuel Mix by Region
Region Fuel Type Capacity (MW) Share of Region’s Share of Selected Fuel’s
New Fuel Capacity Emerging Capacity
ASCC Hydro 3,239.24 90.6% 8.1%
Coal 120.00 3.4% 2.0%
Geothermal 110.00 3.1% 4.9%
Jet Fuel 60.00 1.7% 100.0%
Wind 41.60 1.2% 0.1%
Distillate Fuel Oil 3.00 0.1% 4.6%
Total 3,573.84
ERCOT Natural Gas 16,788.97 52.8% 22.0%
Wind 9,652.45 30.3% 12.5%
Nuclear 2,716.00 8.5% 9.5%
Coal 1,500.00 4.7% 25.2%
Solar 890.00 2.8% 2.0%
Waste Heat 266.00 0.8% 55.3%
Biomass Liquid 9.00 0.0% 100.0%
Total 31,822.42
FRCC Natural Gas 3,493.77 42.1% 4.6%
Nuclear 3,000.00 36.1% 10.5%
Solar 1,292.85 15.6% 2.8%
Wood 459.60 5.5% 37.9%
Waste 13.00 0.2% 3.7%
Hydro 26.30 0.3% 0.1%
Landfill Gas 9.00 0.1% 4.6%
Other 4.40 0.1% 1.3%
Total 8,298.92
HCC Wind 565.00 63.2% 0.7%
Geothermal 100.00 11.2% 4.5%
Solar 72.00 8.1% 0.2%
Liquified Natural Gas 50.63 5.7% 100.0%
Agricultural Byproduct 50.00 5.6% 79.2%
Landfill Gas 15.00 1.7% 7.6%
Hydro 12.50 1.4% 0.0%
Distillate Fuel Oil 10.00 1.1% 15.4%
Waste 7.30 0.8% 2.1%
Biomass Solid 6.00 0.7% 4.5%
Wood 4.98 0.6% 0.4%
Total 893.41
continued on next page
41. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 36
Proposed Plants and Plants Pending Application: Fuel Mix by Region (continued from page 35)
Region Fuel Type Capacity (MW) Share of Region’s Share of Selected Fuel’s
New Fuel Capacity Emerging Capacity
MRO Wind 12,826.00 75.3% 16.6%
Natural Gas 3,325.52 19.5% 4.4%
Coal 375.00 2.2% 6.3%
Solar 361.75 2.1% 0.8%
Hydro 67.37 0.4% 0.2%
Wood 40.00 0.2% 3.3%
Biomass Solid 30.00 0.2% 22.5%
Biomass Gas 2.70 0.0% 4.2%
Landfill Gas 1.60 0.0% 0.8%
Total 17,029.94
NPCC Natural Gas 6,338.85 49.2% 8.3%
Wind 5,011.77 38.9% 6.5%
Residual Fuel Oil 632.40 4.9% 100.0%
Hydro 416.86 3.2% 1.0%
Solar 384.52 3.0% 0.8%
Wood 97.90 0.8% 8.1%
Other 4.80 0.0% 1.4%
Landfill Gas 4.80 0.0% 2.4%
Waste 3.20 0.0% 0.9%
Biomass Gas 1.00 0.0% 1.6%
Total 12,896.10
RFC Natural Gas 22,021.79 52.5% 28.8%
Wind 9,101.40 21.7% 11.8%
Nuclear 4,750.00 11.3% 16.7%
Hydro 3,823.76 9.1% 9.6%
Coal 1,266.00 3.0% 21.2%
Solar 478.30 1.1% 1.0%
Waste Heat 160.00 0.4% 33.3%
Waste 100.50 0.2% 28.5%
Blast Furnace Gas 100.00 0.2% 16.7%
Wood 82.50 0.2% 6.8%
Landfill Gas 34.00 0.1% 17.3%
Biomass Gas 14.00 0.0% 21.9%
Biomass Other 8.00 0.0% 14.9%
Biomass Solid 6.40 0.0% 4.8%
Distillate Fuel Oil 5.90 0.0% 9.1%
Other 3.00 0.0% 0.9%
Total 41,955.55
continued on next page
42. America’s Electricity Generation Capacity 2015 Update 37
SERC Wind 8,870.35 28.1% 11.5%
Natural Gas 7,154.20 22.7% 9.4%
Nuclear 5,065.00 16.1% 17.8%
Hydro 4,666.03 14.8% 11.7%
Solar 4,358.06 13.8% 9.6%
Blast Furnace Gas 500.00 1.6% 83.3%
Wood 467.00 1.5% 38.5%
Waste 210.40 0.7% 59.7%
Waste Heat 65.00 0.2% 13.5%
Biomass Solid 61.43 0.2% 46.0%
Distillate Fuel Oil 46.05 0.1% 70.9%
Biomass Other 45.60 0.1% 85.1%
Landfill Gas 12.10 0.0% 6.2%
Other 8.80 0.0% 2.6%
Biomass Gas 3.12 0.0% 4.9%
Total 31,533.14
SPP Wind 7,138.52 60.1% 9.3%
Nuclear 2,700.00 22.7% 9.5%
Natural Gas 1,176.76 9.9% 1.5%
Hydro 794.92 6.7% 2.0%
Solar 62.80 0.5% 0.1%
Total 11,873.00
WECC Solar 37,661.03 31.4% 82.7%
Hydro 26,795.33 22.3% 67.3%
Wind 23,847.80 19.9% 30.9%
Natural Gas 16,141.38 13.4% 21.1%
Nuclear 10,240.00 8.5% 36.0%
Geothermal 2,032.70 1.7% 90.6%
Coal 2,701.00 2.3% 45.3%
Other 317.59 0.3% 93.8%
Landfill Gas 119.97 0.1% 61.1%
Wood 61.80 0.1% 5.1%
Biomass Gas 43.10 0.0% 67.4%
Biomass Solid 29.80 0.0% 22.3%
Agricultural Byproduct 19.44 0.0% 30.8%
Waste 18.20 0.0% 5.2%
Total 120,029.14 .
Proposed Plants and Plants Pending Application: Fuel Mix by Region (continued from page 36)
Region Fuel Type Capacity (MW) Share of Region’s Share of Selected Fuel’s
New Fuel Capacity Emerging Capacity