There was a significant effect of physical activity level on coping with workplace stress. A one-way ANOVA showed a significant effect at p<0.05. Post-hoc Tukey tests found significant differences between sedentary and moderate activity levels (p<0.002) and sedentary and high activity levels (p<0.001), but no other significant differences between groups. The results suggest that moderate and high physical activity levels are associated with better coping with workplace stress than sedentary levels.

1. 1. State hypothesis:
H0 : µ1 + µ2 + µ3 + µ4
Ha: At leastone groupmeandiffer
2. Make a decisionbasedon SPSSoutput:
“There was a signification effect of physical activity remembered at the p<0.05 level for
three conditions (F (2, 27) = 8.32 , p = 0.00).”
3. Interpret POST- HOC result:
Multiple Comparisons
Coping with workplace stress score
Tukey HSD
(I) Physical Activity
Level
(J) Physical Activity
Level
Mean
Difference (I-
J) Std. Error Sig.
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Sedentary Low -1.72762 .70650 .092 -3.6610 .2058
Moderate -2.97153*
.72557 .002 -4.9571 -.9860
High -3.35409* .74936 .001 -5.4048 -1.3034
Low Sedentary 1.72762 .70650 .092 -.2058 3.6610
Moderate -1.24391 .68121 .284 -3.1081 .6203
High -1.62647 .70650 .123 -3.5599 .3069
Moderate Sedentary 2.97153*
.72557 .002 .9860 4.9571
Low 1.24391 .68121 .284 -.6203 3.1081
High -.38256 .72557 .952 -2.3681 1.6030
High Sedentary 3.35409* .74936 .001 1.3034 5.4048
Low 1.62647 .70650 .123 -.3069 3.5599
Moderate .38256 .72557 .952 -1.6030 2.3681
ANOVA
Coping with workplace stress score
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 49.033 3 16.344 8.316 .000
Within Groups 53.066 27 1.965
Total 102.099 30

2. Multiple Comparisons
Coping with workplace stress score
Tukey HSD
(I) Physical Activity
Level
(J) Physical Activity
Level
Mean
Difference (I-
J) Std. Error Sig.
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Sedentary Low -1.72762 .70650 .092 -3.6610 .2058
Moderate -2.97153*
.72557 .002 -4.9571 -.9860
High -3.35409*
.74936 .001 -5.4048 -1.3034
Low Sedentary 1.72762 .70650 .092 -.2058 3.6610
Moderate -1.24391 .68121 .284 -3.1081 .6203
High -1.62647 .70650 .123 -3.5599 .3069
Moderate Sedentary 2.97153*
.72557 .002 .9860 4.9571
Low 1.24391 .68121 .284 -.6203 3.1081
High -.38256 .72557 .952 -2.3681 1.6030
High Sedentary 3.35409*
.74936 .001 1.3034 5.4048
Low 1.62647 .70650 .123 -.3069 3.5599
Moderate .38256 .72557 .952 -1.6030 2.3681
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
Group 1 (Sedentary and Low) : p >0.092 (statistically not significant)
Group 2 (Sedentary and Moderate ) : p < 0.002 (statistically significant)
Group 3 (Sedentary and High ) : p < 0.001 (statistically significant)
Group 4 (Low and Moderate ) : p >0.284 (statistically not significant)
Group 5 (Low and High) : p >0.123 (statistically not significant)
Group 6 (Moderate and high ) : p >0.952 (statistically not significant)
4. Present your report according to APA:
A one way between subject ANOVA was conducted to compare the effect of physical activity.
There was a signification effect of physical activity remembered at the p<0.05 level for three
conditions (F (2, 27) = 8.32 , p = 0.00). Post hoc comparison using the Turkey HSD test
indicated that the mean score for Group 1 , Sedentary and Low ( p >0.092) was statistically not
significant. Group 2, Sedentary and Moderate : p < 0.002 was statistically significant
Group 3 , Sedentary and High (p < 0.001) was statistically significant. However, Group 4 ,
Low and Moderate, (p >0.284) was statistically not significant. Group 5, Low and High (p

3. >0.123) was statistically not significant. Then Group 6 ,Moderate and high ( p >0.952) was
statistically not significant.