A Proposal to Study the Effects of
Adding Pre-Exercise to Mindfulness-
Based Training
Ryan C. Dugan, Samuel E. Dunham, Daniel J. O’Shea,
& Josh S. Shiver
Valdosta State University
Logic
• Occupational stress is associated with absenteeism, health
insurance claims, performance, and turnover intention.
• Mindfulness training is associated with low stress levels
and increased cognitive performance.
• People vary in difficulty being induced into a “mindful” state
due individual differences in dispositional and situational
factors such as stress and anxiety.
• Exercise is associated with decreased stress and anxiety.
Relevant Social Psychological Principles
• Social Affect
• Stress negatively impacts:
• Knowledge acquisition
• Schema accessibility
• Attribution
• Attitudes
• Persuasion
• Resilience
• Self-esteem
• Coping
Method
• Participants:
• One organization
• Departments will be coded
• Individuals who participated in the previous mindfulness
training program within the organization
Method
• Procedures:
• Two pre-exercise mindfulness training sessions per week, one
guided and one self-guided, for 50 weeks
• Pre-exercise activity will include walking the length of the
room, and lunging back at a pace set by the instructor
• Levels of the intervention will include 0 minutes, 5 minutes, 10
minutes, and 15 minutes
• Post-exercise mindfulness training will last 30 minutes for all
intervention levels
• Participants will be surveyed once per month
Hypotheses
• H1a: Organizational absenteeism data will show a
significant reduction from pre to post-study.
• H1b: The number of health insurance claims will be
significantly less at post-study than pre-study.
• H1c: Organizational turnover data will show significant
reduction from pre to post-study.
• H1d: Department-based job performance data will show
significant increase from pre to post-study.
Hypotheses
• H2a: Individual measures of perceived ease of mindfulness
state will significantly increase from pre to post-study.
• H2b: Individual measures of mindfulness level based on
FFMQ will significantly increase from pre to post-study.
• H2c: Individual measures of perceived stress will
significantly decrease from pre to post-study.
• H2d: Individual measures of turnover intentions will
significantly decrease from pre to post-study.
Hypotheses
• H3a: Individual gains in perceived ease of mindfulness will
co-vary with measures of amount of exercise outside
of work.
• H3b: Individual gains in mindfulness level based on FFMQ
will co-vary with measures of amount of exercise
outside of work.
Hypotheses
• H4a: Amount of time spent pre-exercising will show an
inverted-U relationship with perceived ease of
mindfulness.
• H4b:Amount of time spent pre-exercising will show an
inverted-U relationship with level of mindfulness based
on FFMQ.
Analyses
• Correlations
• To examine convergent and discriminant validity
• t-tests
• To interpret changes in organizational measures
• ANOVAs
• To compare differences across levels of the intervention
Discussion: Organizational Measures
• Direct effects:
• Significant decreases in absenteeism, number of health
insurance claims, and turnover
• Significant increases in departmental job performance
• Indirect effects:
• Increased organizational efficiency
• Improvement in the quality of the work environment
• Increase in revenue
Discussion: Individual Measures
• Direct effects:
• Significant increase in perceived ease of mindfulness and
FFMQ mindfulness
• Significant decrease in perceived level of stress
• Indirect effects:
• Individuals may partake in more exercise outside of work,
which could lead to even further decreases in stress and
anxiety
Discussion: Demographical
Differences
• Direct effects:
• Significant differences would be considered a limitation of the
study
• Indirect effects:
• Significant differences could provide insight on how to target
specific audiences
• Further research needed
Discussion: Differences in Intervention
• Direct effects:
• An optimal level might exist, rather than only a minimum level
• Indirect effects:
• Limitation in organizational application as the likelihood of
implementing small time-periods is greater than larger time-
periods
Discussion: Potential Limitations
• Generalizability of results
• Participants are volunteers
• Assumption of full involvement in participants
• Self-report biases
References
• Available upon request via email
• rcdugan@valdosta.edu
• sedunham@valdosta.edu
• djoshea@valdosta.edu
• jsshiver@valdosta.edu

Research proposal presentation

  • 1.
    A Proposal toStudy the Effects of Adding Pre-Exercise to Mindfulness- Based Training Ryan C. Dugan, Samuel E. Dunham, Daniel J. O’Shea, & Josh S. Shiver Valdosta State University
  • 2.
    Logic • Occupational stressis associated with absenteeism, health insurance claims, performance, and turnover intention. • Mindfulness training is associated with low stress levels and increased cognitive performance. • People vary in difficulty being induced into a “mindful” state due individual differences in dispositional and situational factors such as stress and anxiety. • Exercise is associated with decreased stress and anxiety.
  • 3.
    Relevant Social PsychologicalPrinciples • Social Affect • Stress negatively impacts: • Knowledge acquisition • Schema accessibility • Attribution • Attitudes • Persuasion • Resilience • Self-esteem • Coping
  • 4.
    Method • Participants: • Oneorganization • Departments will be coded • Individuals who participated in the previous mindfulness training program within the organization
  • 5.
    Method • Procedures: • Twopre-exercise mindfulness training sessions per week, one guided and one self-guided, for 50 weeks • Pre-exercise activity will include walking the length of the room, and lunging back at a pace set by the instructor • Levels of the intervention will include 0 minutes, 5 minutes, 10 minutes, and 15 minutes • Post-exercise mindfulness training will last 30 minutes for all intervention levels • Participants will be surveyed once per month
  • 6.
    Hypotheses • H1a: Organizationalabsenteeism data will show a significant reduction from pre to post-study. • H1b: The number of health insurance claims will be significantly less at post-study than pre-study. • H1c: Organizational turnover data will show significant reduction from pre to post-study. • H1d: Department-based job performance data will show significant increase from pre to post-study.
  • 7.
    Hypotheses • H2a: Individualmeasures of perceived ease of mindfulness state will significantly increase from pre to post-study. • H2b: Individual measures of mindfulness level based on FFMQ will significantly increase from pre to post-study. • H2c: Individual measures of perceived stress will significantly decrease from pre to post-study. • H2d: Individual measures of turnover intentions will significantly decrease from pre to post-study.
  • 8.
    Hypotheses • H3a: Individualgains in perceived ease of mindfulness will co-vary with measures of amount of exercise outside of work. • H3b: Individual gains in mindfulness level based on FFMQ will co-vary with measures of amount of exercise outside of work.
  • 9.
    Hypotheses • H4a: Amountof time spent pre-exercising will show an inverted-U relationship with perceived ease of mindfulness. • H4b:Amount of time spent pre-exercising will show an inverted-U relationship with level of mindfulness based on FFMQ.
  • 10.
    Analyses • Correlations • Toexamine convergent and discriminant validity • t-tests • To interpret changes in organizational measures • ANOVAs • To compare differences across levels of the intervention
  • 11.
    Discussion: Organizational Measures •Direct effects: • Significant decreases in absenteeism, number of health insurance claims, and turnover • Significant increases in departmental job performance • Indirect effects: • Increased organizational efficiency • Improvement in the quality of the work environment • Increase in revenue
  • 12.
    Discussion: Individual Measures •Direct effects: • Significant increase in perceived ease of mindfulness and FFMQ mindfulness • Significant decrease in perceived level of stress • Indirect effects: • Individuals may partake in more exercise outside of work, which could lead to even further decreases in stress and anxiety
  • 13.
    Discussion: Demographical Differences • Directeffects: • Significant differences would be considered a limitation of the study • Indirect effects: • Significant differences could provide insight on how to target specific audiences • Further research needed
  • 14.
    Discussion: Differences inIntervention • Direct effects: • An optimal level might exist, rather than only a minimum level • Indirect effects: • Limitation in organizational application as the likelihood of implementing small time-periods is greater than larger time- periods
  • 15.
    Discussion: Potential Limitations •Generalizability of results • Participants are volunteers • Assumption of full involvement in participants • Self-report biases
  • 16.
    References • Available uponrequest via email • rcdugan@valdosta.edu • sedunham@valdosta.edu • djoshea@valdosta.edu • jsshiver@valdosta.edu

Editor's Notes

  • #4 http://catalog.flatworldknowledge.com/bookhub/2105?e=stangorsocial_1.0-ch03_s02 http://wps.prenhall.com/hss_aronson_socpsych_6/64/16430/4206089.cw/index.html