SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
Download to read offline
Stephen Mopope (Kiowa, 1898–1974), Young
Mother, 1929, watercolor on paper, 9¼” x 5½”
Monroe Tsatoke (Kiowa, 1904–1937), Belo
Cozad, undated, watercolor on paper, 11” x 8”
D
URING THE EIGHTEENTH AND NINETEENTH CENTURIES,
Plains Indian men recorded their martial accomplishments and
spiritual encounters on their clothing and robes and on tipi
exteriors. As Europeans and Americans began crossing the Plains, they
brought with them paper and pencils, and these new mediums were soon
utilized by Native artists. The lined accounting books used by traders and
the military provided an abundant source of drawing paper and early Plains
Indian works of art on paper are referred to as “ledger art.” The ledger art
tradition declined after the 1880s as sedentary reservation life became the
norm and there was no longer a need for men to record their battle exploits
and hunting successes.
The work of the Kiowa artist Silver Horn
(Haungooah; 1860–1940) is a major link
in the artistic chain that connected the
nineteenth-century Plains pictographic
tradition to the Plains painting tradition of
the twentieth-century. Silver Horn’s father
was a keeper of one of the Kiowa pictorial
calendars. His older brother Ohettoint
(1852–1934) also made and sold ledger-
style art while imprisoned at Fort Marion
in St. Augustine, Florida, during the 1870s.
Besides inspiring his own children to
produce creative work in a variety of
mediums, Silver Horn also influenced
the Kiowa artists who began working with
Oscar Brousse Jacobson (1882–1966) at
the University of Oklahoma during the late
1920s. He was the grand-uncle of Stephen
Mopope (1898–1974), and Mopope
and James Auchiah (1906–1974) both
acknowledged him as their first teacher.
Spencer Asah (1906–1954) was also a
relative and Jack Hokeah (1902–1969)
was a frequent visitor to his home.
The work of the Kiowa Six artists represents
a watershed in twentieth-century American
Indian art. In about 1914, Mopope, Hokeah,
Asah and Auchiah began receiving art
instruction at the St. Patrick’s Mission
School in Anadarko, Oklahoma. Several
years later, they took part in a fine arts class
that was organized under the auspices of
the Kiowa Agency. Then, with two others—
Monroe Tsatoke (1904–1937) and Lois
(Bougetah) Smoky (1907–1981)—they
enrolled in art classes at the University of
Oklahoma. Smoky’s tenure in the program
was short-lived, however.
The Director of the University’s School of
Art, Jacobson, organized an exhibition of
Kiowa work that traveled widely beginning
in 1928. The display was featured at the
International Folk Art Congress in Prague
and a print portfolio of the exhibited works,
titled Kiowa Indian Art, was published in
Paris in 1929. The five men continued
working as artists for the remainder of their
lives. In a 1975 interview, Creek artist Fred
2
Allan C. Houser (Chiricahua Apache, 1914–1994), Buffalo Hunt, 1952,
gouache on illustration board, 17¼” x 26½”
Harrison Begay (Navajo, 1917–2012), Navajo Maidens, c. 1970,
watercolor on paper, 14” x 10”
Beaver (1911–1980) commented on the education and legacy
of the Kiowa Six painters and the fact that they were largely self-
taught: “The way we paint, that came from us. Just like I taught
myself to paint; so did Mopope and Tsatoke and all those Kiowa
boys. . . . I saw those Kiowas and I knew Dr. Jacobson pretty well . . .
I know that Miss Peters pretty much let them do what they wanted
to do. Their art was their own, all the way.”
Works of art on paper by Southwest Indian artists had appeared
prior to 1900, especially among Native artists working with
anthropologists. After 1910, Edgar Lee Hewett (1865–1946)
encouraged the work of artists who were part of what is now
called the San Ildefonso Watercolor Movement. He arranged for
the Pueblo men who were working for him in excavations in Frijoles
Canyon (near present-day Los Alamos) to receive art supplies and
he also commissioned paintings from them. The resultant works
usually showed ceremonial scenes or other Pueblo activities.
Artists linked with the movement included its “founder,” Crescencio
Martinez (1879–1918), his nephew, Awa Tsireh (Alfonso Roybal;
1898–1955), and Julian Martinez (1879–1943; husband of the
famous potter, Maria). Hewett also encouraged the talents of Tonita
Peña (Quah Ah; 1893–1945), who was the only woman associated
with the early watercolorists.
In about 1915, Hopi artist Fred Kabotie (c. 1900–1986) was forced
to leave Second Mesa in Arizona and attend the Santa Fe Indian
School. Several years later, the school’s new superintendent, John
DeHuff (1872–1945), allowed his wife, Elizabeth (1892–1983), to
begin teaching painting to students. The classes also included well-
known artists Otis Polelonema (Hopi; 1902–1981) and Velino Shije
Herrera (Zia; 1902–1973).
When talking about his earliest work, Kabotie said, “When you’re
so remote from your own people, you get lonesome. You don’t paint
what’s around you, you paint what you have in mind. Loneliness
moves you to express something of your home, your background.”
He also said, “”I had been away [from Hopi] so long then that I
was yearning . . . getting lonesome for my Hopi way, and I started
painting katsinas, because I missed them. . . .” Despite these
innocent sentiments, controversy erupted around the DeHuffs’ art
classes and critics alleged that the sessions encouraged paganism,
the recollection of traditional stories and the recording of Native
religious activity. As a result, John DeHuff was eventually demoted
and forced to leave the Indian School.
Attitudes eventually changed and when a painting studio was
founded at the Santa Fe Indian School in 1932, it marked a major
milestone in the development of twentieth-century American Indian
art. Santa Fe students were encouraged to paint subjects with
3
Archie Blackowl (Southern Cheyenne, 1911–1992), Love Call, c. 1970,
tempera on mat board, 19½” x 14½”
Fred Beaver (Creek/Seminole, 1911–1980), Seminole Cook, 1971,
gouache on board, 9” x 11”
which they were familiar and to find visual inspiration in traditions
such as ledger drawings, pottery designs, and rock art. They
were also instructed to avoid the influence of non-Native artistic
expression. The Studio’s Pueblo students used dancers and dances
as their primary subject matter. In contrast, Navajo painters chose
pastoral landscapes, animal subjects, and genre scenes for their
compositions. Equestrian subjects were also common.
The Studio ultimately provided a training ground for nearly thirty
painters whose work defined public perceptions of Native American
art for more than half a century. Of this number, four Navajo artists—
Harrison Begay (1917–2012), Gerald Nailor (1917–1952), Quincy
Tahoma (1920–1956), and Andrew Van Tsihnahjinnie (1916–2000)—
are said to have painted and sold more pictures than all of the other
Studio alumni combined.
The success of the Kiowa Six and Santa Fe Studio artists made
Plains and Southwestern Indian subjects popular with aficionados
of twentieth-century Indian painting. During the second half of the
twentieth-century, however, many eastern Oklahoma artists chose
not to paint what had become stereotypical imagery. They instead
turned to their own traditions and painted modern and historic
scenes of Southeastern Indian life. Some of these artists attended
Bacone College in Muskogee, Oklahoma—a Baptist-run institution
that took a progressive role in Indian education. Prior to 1970,
Bacone’s Art Department was directed variously by artists Acee
Blue Eagle (Creek; 1907–1959), Woody Crumbo (Potawatomi;
1912–1989) and W. Richard West, Sr. (Southern Cheyenne;
1912–1996). Importantly, West said in 1955 that “the Indian artist
must be allowed to absorb influences outside of his own art forms
and develop them in his own manner.”
At both the University of Oklahoma and the Santa Fe Indian School,
romantically inclined educators had encouraged young Indian artists
to find and preserve the primitive and the unspoiled, and to remain
untaught. They encouraged their students to produce works that
they believed looked uniquely “Indian.” Lakota artist Oscar Howe
(1915–1983) responded to this regimen in 1958, when he wrote,
“There is much more to Indian Art, than pretty, stylized pictures . . .
Are we to be held back forever with one phase of Indian painting,
with no right for individualism, dictated to as the Indian always has
been, put on reservations and treated like a child, and only the
White Man knows what is best for him?”
Several factors soon encouraged Native artists to create personal,
expressive and socially meaningful art. The conservative proponents
of Indian painting ultimately recognized that the style of art they
Anthony Edward “Tony” Da (San Ildefonso
Pueblo, 1940–2008), Symbols of the Southwest,
1970, tempera on paper, 19½” x 14¾”
Joe Hilario Herrera (Cochiti Pueblo, 1923–
2001), Eagles and Rabbit (Symbols Used on
Altars), c. 1950, paint on board, 15¼” x 13”
Patrick DesJarlait, (Chippewa, 1921–1973),
The Catch, 1970, tempera on paper, 19¾” x 25”
were promoting had become sterile. The
civil rights movement also gave rise to a
generation of politically active Indian young
people who found social commentary
to be a necessary expression. Too, the
Southwest Indian Art Project—sponsored
by the Rockefeller Foundation—was held
at the University of Arizona in Tucson
during the summers of 1960 and 1961.
This led to the founding of the Institute
of American Indian Arts in Santa Fe in
1962. The Institute and its celebrated
instructors—Fritz Scholder (Luiseño;
1937–2005), Allen Houser (Chiricahua
Apache; 1914–1994) and Charles Loloma
(Hopi; 1921–1991) among them—taught
that the form and content of Indian art
could embrace the ideas and techniques
in use in the mainstream art community.
A new generation of painters brought
rapid change and in 1971, in his Indian
Painters and White Patrons, J.J. Brody
observed that “easel painting was a
White art medium; it was given to the
Indians, and the result for fifty years was
meek acceptance. Now the Indians have
taken it . . . The taking has resulted in a
vital, expressive, sometimes un-pretty,
sometimes polemical, and always
stylistically varied art. The forms may
be quite un-Indian but they merely
reflect radical changes in the purpose
of Indian art.”
Steven L. Grafe, Ph.D.
Curator of Art
All of the pictured works are from the
Arthur and Shifra Silberman Collection,
National Cowboy & Western Heritage
Museum, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
FURTHER READING:
Anthes, Bill. Native Moderns: American
Indian Painting, 1940–1960. Durham,
NC: Duke University Press, 2006.
Bernstein, Bruce, and W. Jackson Rushing.
Modern by Tradition: American Indian
Painting in the Studio Style. Santa
Fe, NM: Museum of New Mexico
Press, 1995.
Brody, J.J. Indian Painters and White
Patrons. Albuquerque, NM: University
of New Mexico Press, 1971.
---. Pueblo Indian Painting: Tradition and
Modernism in New Mexico, 1900–1930.
Santa Fe, NM: School of American
Research Press, 1997.
Burke, Christina E. Impact: The Philbrook
Indian Annual, 1946–1979. Tulsa, OK:
Philbrook Museum of Art, 2014.
Dunn, Dorothy. American Indian Painting
of the Southwest and Plains Areas.
Albuquerque, NM: University of New
Mexico Press, 1968.
McGeough, Michelle. Through Their Eyes:
Indian Painting in Santa Fe, 1918–1945.
Santa Fe, NM: Wheelwright Museum of
the American Indian, 2009.
Seymour, Tryntje Van Ness. When the
Rainbow Touches Down: The Artists
and Stories Behind the Apache, Navajo,
Rio Grande Pueblo, and Hopi Paintings
in the William and Leslie Van Ness
Denman Collection. Phoenix, AZ:
Heard Museum, 1988.
Wyckoff, Lydia L. Visions and Voices: Native
American Painting from the Philbrook
Museum of Art. Tulsa, OK: Philbrook
Museum of Art, 1996.
35 Maryhill Museum Dr.
Goldendale, WA 98620
509.773.3733
maryhillmuseum.org

More Related Content

What's hot

Lesson 6: interpretion and analysis in contemporary art
Lesson 6: interpretion and analysis in contemporary artLesson 6: interpretion and analysis in contemporary art
Lesson 6: interpretion and analysis in contemporary artFaythsheriegne Godoy
 
3d assemblage and sculpture presentation
3d assemblage and sculpture presentation3d assemblage and sculpture presentation
3d assemblage and sculpture presentationLoulizerl Infante
 
Contemporary Philippine Arts from the Regions
Contemporary Philippine Arts from the RegionsContemporary Philippine Arts from the Regions
Contemporary Philippine Arts from the RegionsNoel Banca
 
Lives and works of filipino artist
Lives and works of filipino artistLives and works of filipino artist
Lives and works of filipino artistJessica Ortega II
 
NationalArtistinthePhilippines
NationalArtistinthePhilippinesNationalArtistinthePhilippines
NationalArtistinthePhilippinesJan Jan Sieras
 
Depression To Pop
Depression To PopDepression To Pop
Depression To Popbassmanb
 
Trends of contemporary _ arts_ course _ structure _2_
Trends of contemporary _ arts_ course _ structure _2_Trends of contemporary _ arts_ course _ structure _2_
Trends of contemporary _ arts_ course _ structure _2_Amen Mohamed Eid
 
1 What is Con(temporary) Art?
1 What is Con(temporary) Art?1 What is Con(temporary) Art?
1 What is Con(temporary) Art?Ophelynn Cano
 
ARTalk Tuesday Jacob Lawrence
ARTalk Tuesday Jacob Lawrence ARTalk Tuesday Jacob Lawrence
ARTalk Tuesday Jacob Lawrence marilyn traeger
 
Integrative art (function of arts and affecting styles)
Integrative art (function of arts and affecting styles)Integrative art (function of arts and affecting styles)
Integrative art (function of arts and affecting styles)Huwarang Renz
 
H.R. Ocampo and Fernando Zobel
H.R. Ocampo and Fernando ZobelH.R. Ocampo and Fernando Zobel
H.R. Ocampo and Fernando ZobelKaye Laririt
 
SUBJECT MATTER IN CONTEMPORARY ARTS
SUBJECT MATTER IN CONTEMPORARY ARTSSUBJECT MATTER IN CONTEMPORARY ARTS
SUBJECT MATTER IN CONTEMPORARY ARTSShin Chan
 
National artist
National artistNational artist
National artistFerry0720
 
Father of philippine arts
Father of philippine artsFather of philippine arts
Father of philippine artsAbegailAlolod
 

What's hot (20)

Lesson 6: interpretion and analysis in contemporary art
Lesson 6: interpretion and analysis in contemporary artLesson 6: interpretion and analysis in contemporary art
Lesson 6: interpretion and analysis in contemporary art
 
3d assemblage and sculpture presentation
3d assemblage and sculpture presentation3d assemblage and sculpture presentation
3d assemblage and sculpture presentation
 
Painting in the philippines
Painting in the philippinesPainting in the philippines
Painting in the philippines
 
Contemporary Philippine Arts from the Regions
Contemporary Philippine Arts from the RegionsContemporary Philippine Arts from the Regions
Contemporary Philippine Arts from the Regions
 
Lives and works of filipino artist
Lives and works of filipino artistLives and works of filipino artist
Lives and works of filipino artist
 
NationalArtistinthePhilippines
NationalArtistinthePhilippinesNationalArtistinthePhilippines
NationalArtistinthePhilippines
 
Nhel
NhelNhel
Nhel
 
Depression To Pop
Depression To PopDepression To Pop
Depression To Pop
 
Trends of contemporary _ arts_ course _ structure _2_
Trends of contemporary _ arts_ course _ structure _2_Trends of contemporary _ arts_ course _ structure _2_
Trends of contemporary _ arts_ course _ structure _2_
 
1 What is Con(temporary) Art?
1 What is Con(temporary) Art?1 What is Con(temporary) Art?
1 What is Con(temporary) Art?
 
ARTalk Tuesday Jacob Lawrence
ARTalk Tuesday Jacob Lawrence ARTalk Tuesday Jacob Lawrence
ARTalk Tuesday Jacob Lawrence
 
Integrative art (function of arts and affecting styles)
Integrative art (function of arts and affecting styles)Integrative art (function of arts and affecting styles)
Integrative art (function of arts and affecting styles)
 
Indigeneity (QUT)
Indigeneity (QUT)Indigeneity (QUT)
Indigeneity (QUT)
 
H.R. Ocampo and Fernando Zobel
H.R. Ocampo and Fernando ZobelH.R. Ocampo and Fernando Zobel
H.R. Ocampo and Fernando Zobel
 
Philippine Art History
Philippine Art HistoryPhilippine Art History
Philippine Art History
 
SUBJECT MATTER IN CONTEMPORARY ARTS
SUBJECT MATTER IN CONTEMPORARY ARTSSUBJECT MATTER IN CONTEMPORARY ARTS
SUBJECT MATTER IN CONTEMPORARY ARTS
 
National artist
National artistNational artist
National artist
 
Cesar Torrente Legaspi
Cesar Torrente LegaspiCesar Torrente Legaspi
Cesar Torrente Legaspi
 
Father of philippine arts
Father of philippine artsFather of philippine arts
Father of philippine arts
 
Conarts 1
Conarts 1Conarts 1
Conarts 1
 

Viewers also liked

Medios de exticion tributaria
Medios de exticion tributariaMedios de exticion tributaria
Medios de exticion tributariaAlibeth Maduro
 
The United States government
The United States governmentThe United States government
The United States governmentMsSbarbada
 
Corectivo unidad 2 yordi
Corectivo unidad 2 yordi Corectivo unidad 2 yordi
Corectivo unidad 2 yordi Yordi700
 
pasos para hacer un compostaje
pasos para hacer un compostajepasos para hacer un compostaje
pasos para hacer un compostajeClaire Escobar
 
His 102 chapter 19 ppt
His 102 chapter 19 pptHis 102 chapter 19 ppt
His 102 chapter 19 pptdcyw1112
 
Margot Ellis-4 pg resume-Oct 2016
Margot Ellis-4 pg resume-Oct 2016Margot Ellis-4 pg resume-Oct 2016
Margot Ellis-4 pg resume-Oct 2016Margot Ellis
 
El género dramático
El género dramático El género dramático
El género dramático lkvillarreal
 
Cuadro comparativo
Cuadro comparativoCuadro comparativo
Cuadro comparativoargimenez
 
Manufacturing-Backgrounder
Manufacturing-BackgrounderManufacturing-Backgrounder
Manufacturing-BackgrounderWes Frye
 
Tic ooctubre 10
Tic ooctubre 10Tic ooctubre 10
Tic ooctubre 10Nelcita1
 
Presenter study
Presenter studyPresenter study
Presenter studyDanGozza
 
Brief service info
Brief service infoBrief service info
Brief service infoMilos Krneta
 
Mr. Dino - Saaed Magazine
Mr. Dino - Saaed MagazineMr. Dino - Saaed Magazine
Mr. Dino - Saaed MagazineDino Kalivas
 

Viewers also liked (18)

The Resume
The ResumeThe Resume
The Resume
 
Medios de exticion tributaria
Medios de exticion tributariaMedios de exticion tributaria
Medios de exticion tributaria
 
Bandera azul
Bandera azulBandera azul
Bandera azul
 
The United States government
The United States governmentThe United States government
The United States government
 
Corectivo unidad 2 yordi
Corectivo unidad 2 yordi Corectivo unidad 2 yordi
Corectivo unidad 2 yordi
 
pasos para hacer un compostaje
pasos para hacer un compostajepasos para hacer un compostaje
pasos para hacer un compostaje
 
His 102 chapter 19 ppt
His 102 chapter 19 pptHis 102 chapter 19 ppt
His 102 chapter 19 ppt
 
Margot Ellis-4 pg resume-Oct 2016
Margot Ellis-4 pg resume-Oct 2016Margot Ellis-4 pg resume-Oct 2016
Margot Ellis-4 pg resume-Oct 2016
 
El género dramático
El género dramático El género dramático
El género dramático
 
Cuadro comparativo
Cuadro comparativoCuadro comparativo
Cuadro comparativo
 
Manufacturing-Backgrounder
Manufacturing-BackgrounderManufacturing-Backgrounder
Manufacturing-Backgrounder
 
Tic ooctubre 10
Tic ooctubre 10Tic ooctubre 10
Tic ooctubre 10
 
Presenter study
Presenter studyPresenter study
Presenter study
 
spark-operations
spark-operationsspark-operations
spark-operations
 
Brief service info
Brief service infoBrief service info
Brief service info
 
Mr. Dino - Saaed Magazine
Mr. Dino - Saaed MagazineMr. Dino - Saaed Magazine
Mr. Dino - Saaed Magazine
 
Nanotecnologia
NanotecnologiaNanotecnologia
Nanotecnologia
 
03 59282 mukjam3
03 59282 mukjam303 59282 mukjam3
03 59282 mukjam3
 

Similar to American Indian Painting gallery guide

In order to understand contemporary art in South Africa, the po.docx
In order to understand contemporary art in South Africa, the po.docxIn order to understand contemporary art in South Africa, the po.docx
In order to understand contemporary art in South Africa, the po.docxtarifarmarie
 
LAS-ARTS-CONTEMPORARY-12-Q1-WEEK2-ADONIS.CAPULONG.pdf
LAS-ARTS-CONTEMPORARY-12-Q1-WEEK2-ADONIS.CAPULONG.pdfLAS-ARTS-CONTEMPORARY-12-Q1-WEEK2-ADONIS.CAPULONG.pdf
LAS-ARTS-CONTEMPORARY-12-Q1-WEEK2-ADONIS.CAPULONG.pdfAdonisMCapulong
 
Why art matters module 6
Why art matters   module 6Why art matters   module 6
Why art matters module 6PetrutaLipan
 
Grant Wood Essay
Grant Wood EssayGrant Wood Essay
Grant Wood EssayLisa Brown
 
National-Artists-of-the-Philippines.pptx
National-Artists-of-the-Philippines.pptxNational-Artists-of-the-Philippines.pptx
National-Artists-of-the-Philippines.pptxCHARLESFRANCISCALUYO
 
Harlem Renaissance
Harlem RenaissanceHarlem Renaissance
Harlem RenaissanceThomas Dunn
 
WESTERN PAINTERS-by Sunil & Sadiq
WESTERN PAINTERS-by Sunil & SadiqWESTERN PAINTERS-by Sunil & Sadiq
WESTERN PAINTERS-by Sunil & Sadiqsantukana
 
19th-Century African American Artists
19th-Century African American Artists19th-Century African American Artists
19th-Century African American ArtistsHarry Swartz-Turfle
 
Stass Paraskos: art and politics
Stass Paraskos: art and politicsStass Paraskos: art and politics
Stass Paraskos: art and politicsMichaelParaskos
 
Chapter 15 globalism 20 21st century
Chapter 15 globalism 20 21st centuryChapter 15 globalism 20 21st century
Chapter 15 globalism 20 21st centuryKaren Owens
 
Aziz art july 2015
Aziz art july 2015Aziz art july 2015
Aziz art july 2015Aziz Anzabi
 
Modern Chinese Calligraphy
Modern Chinese CalligraphyModern Chinese Calligraphy
Modern Chinese CalligraphyKim A Munson
 
Art Of The 1920’S
Art Of The 1920’SArt Of The 1920’S
Art Of The 1920’SMrG
 

Similar to American Indian Painting gallery guide (20)

In order to understand contemporary art in South Africa, the po.docx
In order to understand contemporary art in South Africa, the po.docxIn order to understand contemporary art in South Africa, the po.docx
In order to understand contemporary art in South Africa, the po.docx
 
LAS-ARTS-CONTEMPORARY-12-Q1-WEEK2-ADONIS.CAPULONG.pdf
LAS-ARTS-CONTEMPORARY-12-Q1-WEEK2-ADONIS.CAPULONG.pdfLAS-ARTS-CONTEMPORARY-12-Q1-WEEK2-ADONIS.CAPULONG.pdf
LAS-ARTS-CONTEMPORARY-12-Q1-WEEK2-ADONIS.CAPULONG.pdf
 
Why art matters module 6
Why art matters   module 6Why art matters   module 6
Why art matters module 6
 
Grant Wood Essay
Grant Wood EssayGrant Wood Essay
Grant Wood Essay
 
National-Artists-of-the-Philippines.pptx
National-Artists-of-the-Philippines.pptxNational-Artists-of-the-Philippines.pptx
National-Artists-of-the-Philippines.pptx
 
Harlem Renaissance
Harlem RenaissanceHarlem Renaissance
Harlem Renaissance
 
Ashcan school and the eight
Ashcan school and the eightAshcan school and the eight
Ashcan school and the eight
 
WESTERN PAINTERS-by Sunil & Sadiq
WESTERN PAINTERS-by Sunil & SadiqWESTERN PAINTERS-by Sunil & Sadiq
WESTERN PAINTERS-by Sunil & Sadiq
 
20s Realism
20s Realism20s Realism
20s Realism
 
19th-Century African American Artists
19th-Century African American Artists19th-Century African American Artists
19th-Century African American Artists
 
Art and social action
Art and social actionArt and social action
Art and social action
 
2- PAINTING.pptx
2- PAINTING.pptx2- PAINTING.pptx
2- PAINTING.pptx
 
Stass Paraskos: art and politics
Stass Paraskos: art and politicsStass Paraskos: art and politics
Stass Paraskos: art and politics
 
ASP 1900-29
ASP 1900-29ASP 1900-29
ASP 1900-29
 
Chapter 15 globalism 20 21st century
Chapter 15 globalism 20 21st centuryChapter 15 globalism 20 21st century
Chapter 15 globalism 20 21st century
 
Aziz art july 2015
Aziz art july 2015Aziz art july 2015
Aziz art july 2015
 
Modern Chinese Calligraphy
Modern Chinese CalligraphyModern Chinese Calligraphy
Modern Chinese Calligraphy
 
HUM1020 Pop Art.pdf
HUM1020 Pop Art.pdfHUM1020 Pop Art.pdf
HUM1020 Pop Art.pdf
 
Pop Art
Pop ArtPop Art
Pop Art
 
Art Of The 1920’S
Art Of The 1920’SArt Of The 1920’S
Art Of The 1920’S
 

American Indian Painting gallery guide

  • 1. Stephen Mopope (Kiowa, 1898–1974), Young Mother, 1929, watercolor on paper, 9¼” x 5½” Monroe Tsatoke (Kiowa, 1904–1937), Belo Cozad, undated, watercolor on paper, 11” x 8” D URING THE EIGHTEENTH AND NINETEENTH CENTURIES, Plains Indian men recorded their martial accomplishments and spiritual encounters on their clothing and robes and on tipi exteriors. As Europeans and Americans began crossing the Plains, they brought with them paper and pencils, and these new mediums were soon utilized by Native artists. The lined accounting books used by traders and the military provided an abundant source of drawing paper and early Plains Indian works of art on paper are referred to as “ledger art.” The ledger art tradition declined after the 1880s as sedentary reservation life became the norm and there was no longer a need for men to record their battle exploits and hunting successes. The work of the Kiowa artist Silver Horn (Haungooah; 1860–1940) is a major link in the artistic chain that connected the nineteenth-century Plains pictographic tradition to the Plains painting tradition of the twentieth-century. Silver Horn’s father was a keeper of one of the Kiowa pictorial calendars. His older brother Ohettoint (1852–1934) also made and sold ledger- style art while imprisoned at Fort Marion in St. Augustine, Florida, during the 1870s. Besides inspiring his own children to produce creative work in a variety of mediums, Silver Horn also influenced the Kiowa artists who began working with Oscar Brousse Jacobson (1882–1966) at the University of Oklahoma during the late 1920s. He was the grand-uncle of Stephen Mopope (1898–1974), and Mopope and James Auchiah (1906–1974) both acknowledged him as their first teacher. Spencer Asah (1906–1954) was also a relative and Jack Hokeah (1902–1969) was a frequent visitor to his home. The work of the Kiowa Six artists represents a watershed in twentieth-century American Indian art. In about 1914, Mopope, Hokeah, Asah and Auchiah began receiving art instruction at the St. Patrick’s Mission School in Anadarko, Oklahoma. Several years later, they took part in a fine arts class that was organized under the auspices of the Kiowa Agency. Then, with two others— Monroe Tsatoke (1904–1937) and Lois (Bougetah) Smoky (1907–1981)—they enrolled in art classes at the University of Oklahoma. Smoky’s tenure in the program was short-lived, however. The Director of the University’s School of Art, Jacobson, organized an exhibition of Kiowa work that traveled widely beginning in 1928. The display was featured at the International Folk Art Congress in Prague and a print portfolio of the exhibited works, titled Kiowa Indian Art, was published in Paris in 1929. The five men continued working as artists for the remainder of their lives. In a 1975 interview, Creek artist Fred
  • 2. 2 Allan C. Houser (Chiricahua Apache, 1914–1994), Buffalo Hunt, 1952, gouache on illustration board, 17¼” x 26½” Harrison Begay (Navajo, 1917–2012), Navajo Maidens, c. 1970, watercolor on paper, 14” x 10” Beaver (1911–1980) commented on the education and legacy of the Kiowa Six painters and the fact that they were largely self- taught: “The way we paint, that came from us. Just like I taught myself to paint; so did Mopope and Tsatoke and all those Kiowa boys. . . . I saw those Kiowas and I knew Dr. Jacobson pretty well . . . I know that Miss Peters pretty much let them do what they wanted to do. Their art was their own, all the way.” Works of art on paper by Southwest Indian artists had appeared prior to 1900, especially among Native artists working with anthropologists. After 1910, Edgar Lee Hewett (1865–1946) encouraged the work of artists who were part of what is now called the San Ildefonso Watercolor Movement. He arranged for the Pueblo men who were working for him in excavations in Frijoles Canyon (near present-day Los Alamos) to receive art supplies and he also commissioned paintings from them. The resultant works usually showed ceremonial scenes or other Pueblo activities. Artists linked with the movement included its “founder,” Crescencio Martinez (1879–1918), his nephew, Awa Tsireh (Alfonso Roybal; 1898–1955), and Julian Martinez (1879–1943; husband of the famous potter, Maria). Hewett also encouraged the talents of Tonita Peña (Quah Ah; 1893–1945), who was the only woman associated with the early watercolorists. In about 1915, Hopi artist Fred Kabotie (c. 1900–1986) was forced to leave Second Mesa in Arizona and attend the Santa Fe Indian School. Several years later, the school’s new superintendent, John DeHuff (1872–1945), allowed his wife, Elizabeth (1892–1983), to begin teaching painting to students. The classes also included well- known artists Otis Polelonema (Hopi; 1902–1981) and Velino Shije Herrera (Zia; 1902–1973). When talking about his earliest work, Kabotie said, “When you’re so remote from your own people, you get lonesome. You don’t paint what’s around you, you paint what you have in mind. Loneliness moves you to express something of your home, your background.” He also said, “”I had been away [from Hopi] so long then that I was yearning . . . getting lonesome for my Hopi way, and I started painting katsinas, because I missed them. . . .” Despite these innocent sentiments, controversy erupted around the DeHuffs’ art classes and critics alleged that the sessions encouraged paganism, the recollection of traditional stories and the recording of Native religious activity. As a result, John DeHuff was eventually demoted and forced to leave the Indian School. Attitudes eventually changed and when a painting studio was founded at the Santa Fe Indian School in 1932, it marked a major milestone in the development of twentieth-century American Indian art. Santa Fe students were encouraged to paint subjects with
  • 3. 3 Archie Blackowl (Southern Cheyenne, 1911–1992), Love Call, c. 1970, tempera on mat board, 19½” x 14½” Fred Beaver (Creek/Seminole, 1911–1980), Seminole Cook, 1971, gouache on board, 9” x 11” which they were familiar and to find visual inspiration in traditions such as ledger drawings, pottery designs, and rock art. They were also instructed to avoid the influence of non-Native artistic expression. The Studio’s Pueblo students used dancers and dances as their primary subject matter. In contrast, Navajo painters chose pastoral landscapes, animal subjects, and genre scenes for their compositions. Equestrian subjects were also common. The Studio ultimately provided a training ground for nearly thirty painters whose work defined public perceptions of Native American art for more than half a century. Of this number, four Navajo artists— Harrison Begay (1917–2012), Gerald Nailor (1917–1952), Quincy Tahoma (1920–1956), and Andrew Van Tsihnahjinnie (1916–2000)— are said to have painted and sold more pictures than all of the other Studio alumni combined. The success of the Kiowa Six and Santa Fe Studio artists made Plains and Southwestern Indian subjects popular with aficionados of twentieth-century Indian painting. During the second half of the twentieth-century, however, many eastern Oklahoma artists chose not to paint what had become stereotypical imagery. They instead turned to their own traditions and painted modern and historic scenes of Southeastern Indian life. Some of these artists attended Bacone College in Muskogee, Oklahoma—a Baptist-run institution that took a progressive role in Indian education. Prior to 1970, Bacone’s Art Department was directed variously by artists Acee Blue Eagle (Creek; 1907–1959), Woody Crumbo (Potawatomi; 1912–1989) and W. Richard West, Sr. (Southern Cheyenne; 1912–1996). Importantly, West said in 1955 that “the Indian artist must be allowed to absorb influences outside of his own art forms and develop them in his own manner.” At both the University of Oklahoma and the Santa Fe Indian School, romantically inclined educators had encouraged young Indian artists to find and preserve the primitive and the unspoiled, and to remain untaught. They encouraged their students to produce works that they believed looked uniquely “Indian.” Lakota artist Oscar Howe (1915–1983) responded to this regimen in 1958, when he wrote, “There is much more to Indian Art, than pretty, stylized pictures . . . Are we to be held back forever with one phase of Indian painting, with no right for individualism, dictated to as the Indian always has been, put on reservations and treated like a child, and only the White Man knows what is best for him?” Several factors soon encouraged Native artists to create personal, expressive and socially meaningful art. The conservative proponents of Indian painting ultimately recognized that the style of art they
  • 4. Anthony Edward “Tony” Da (San Ildefonso Pueblo, 1940–2008), Symbols of the Southwest, 1970, tempera on paper, 19½” x 14¾” Joe Hilario Herrera (Cochiti Pueblo, 1923– 2001), Eagles and Rabbit (Symbols Used on Altars), c. 1950, paint on board, 15¼” x 13” Patrick DesJarlait, (Chippewa, 1921–1973), The Catch, 1970, tempera on paper, 19¾” x 25” were promoting had become sterile. The civil rights movement also gave rise to a generation of politically active Indian young people who found social commentary to be a necessary expression. Too, the Southwest Indian Art Project—sponsored by the Rockefeller Foundation—was held at the University of Arizona in Tucson during the summers of 1960 and 1961. This led to the founding of the Institute of American Indian Arts in Santa Fe in 1962. The Institute and its celebrated instructors—Fritz Scholder (Luiseño; 1937–2005), Allen Houser (Chiricahua Apache; 1914–1994) and Charles Loloma (Hopi; 1921–1991) among them—taught that the form and content of Indian art could embrace the ideas and techniques in use in the mainstream art community. A new generation of painters brought rapid change and in 1971, in his Indian Painters and White Patrons, J.J. Brody observed that “easel painting was a White art medium; it was given to the Indians, and the result for fifty years was meek acceptance. Now the Indians have taken it . . . The taking has resulted in a vital, expressive, sometimes un-pretty, sometimes polemical, and always stylistically varied art. The forms may be quite un-Indian but they merely reflect radical changes in the purpose of Indian art.” Steven L. Grafe, Ph.D. Curator of Art All of the pictured works are from the Arthur and Shifra Silberman Collection, National Cowboy & Western Heritage Museum, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma FURTHER READING: Anthes, Bill. Native Moderns: American Indian Painting, 1940–1960. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006. Bernstein, Bruce, and W. Jackson Rushing. Modern by Tradition: American Indian Painting in the Studio Style. Santa Fe, NM: Museum of New Mexico Press, 1995. Brody, J.J. Indian Painters and White Patrons. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, 1971. ---. Pueblo Indian Painting: Tradition and Modernism in New Mexico, 1900–1930. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, 1997. Burke, Christina E. Impact: The Philbrook Indian Annual, 1946–1979. Tulsa, OK: Philbrook Museum of Art, 2014. Dunn, Dorothy. American Indian Painting of the Southwest and Plains Areas. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, 1968. McGeough, Michelle. Through Their Eyes: Indian Painting in Santa Fe, 1918–1945. Santa Fe, NM: Wheelwright Museum of the American Indian, 2009. Seymour, Tryntje Van Ness. When the Rainbow Touches Down: The Artists and Stories Behind the Apache, Navajo, Rio Grande Pueblo, and Hopi Paintings in the William and Leslie Van Ness Denman Collection. Phoenix, AZ: Heard Museum, 1988. Wyckoff, Lydia L. Visions and Voices: Native American Painting from the Philbrook Museum of Art. Tulsa, OK: Philbrook Museum of Art, 1996. 35 Maryhill Museum Dr. Goldendale, WA 98620 509.773.3733 maryhillmuseum.org