Advocating Working Out Loud (WOL) in an OrganisationMichelle Ockers
Presentation given by Michelle Ockers at EduTECHAU on 8 June 2017. Introduces Working Out Loud Circles and presents three tactics to advocate WOL in an organisation - social proof, showcase, strategic links.
This article originally appeared in Training & Development magazine February 2014 Vol 41 No 1, published by the Australian Institute of Training and Development.
It has been reproduced with permission from the editor.
Advocating Working Out Loud (WOL) in an OrganisationMichelle Ockers
Presentation given by Michelle Ockers at EduTECHAU on 8 June 2017. Introduces Working Out Loud Circles and presents three tactics to advocate WOL in an organisation - social proof, showcase, strategic links.
This article originally appeared in Training & Development magazine February 2014 Vol 41 No 1, published by the Australian Institute of Training and Development.
It has been reproduced with permission from the editor.
Presentation on the evolution of internal communications and the emergence of the social enterprise. Also features tips on how to foster social inside organizations.
The workplace in the digital age. How a digital workplace can support business goals and help bring a shared sense of purpose to an organization. Facts and figures from the 2015 digital workplace survey.
How can companies use their internal communities of practice to collaborate, innovate and grow?
This paper explores the elements of internal on-line community success, and provides examples of how Schneider-Electric addresses this challenge.
Digital Workplace Quick Poll: What's not, what's not!Jane McConnell
Priority topics as voted by 110 organizations worldwide in the July 2013 Quick Poll for the 2014 Digital Workplace Survey.
Lots of food for thought for digital practitioners and their eco-system of partners, consultants, agencies and vendors.
According to Gartner, 70% of social implementations fail because they lack a business purpose. When it comes to harnessing the power of social software, a focus on business value is required. This whitepaper defines a strategic framework for gaining business value from social software. It outlines six successful rollout strategies. Each of the six approaches delivers different business results, and has a different level of risk. And most importantly, each has different requirements to succeed. To be successful with social software, you need to choose the rollout strategy that is best for your organization, and understand its requirements for success.
User Experience (UX) Capacity-Building: A Conceptual Model and Research Agendacraigmmacdonald
Many User Experience (UX) practitioners face organizational barriers that limit their ability to influence product decisions. Unfortunately, there is little concrete knowledge about how to systematically overcome these barriers to optimize UX work and foster a stronger organizational UX culture. This paper introduces the concept of User Experience Capacity-Building (UXCB) to describe the process of building, strengthening, and sustaining effective UX practices throughout an organization. Through an integrated literature review of relevant HCI and capacity-building research, this paper defines UXCB and proposes a conceptual model that outlines the conditions, strategies, and outcomes that define a UXCB initiative. Five areas of future research are presented that aim to deepen our understanding of UXCB as both a practice and an area of scholarship.
Thierry Barsalou - IPSEN CIO - on Traction TeamPage for Competitive Intellige...Traction Software
At the Gilbane Conference, Thierry Barsalou, CIO of IPSEN (a global pharmaceutical company), discusses the benefits of and approach to deploying TeamPage for Competitive Intelligence.
See this on our blog at
http://traction.tractionsoftware.com/traction/permalink/Blog119
Social software lets employees connect and share in new ways, and can dramatically improve the effectiveness of your organization. But social technologies like microblogging, social networking, automated activity feeds, social spreadsheets, wikis, etc. are new to most organizations, and most IT departments don’t have experience with how to successfully implement them.
Success with social software involves a lot more than simply finding the product that best fits your needs. It involves framing the problem appropriately in the first place, defining your business goals, and choosing a rollout methodology designed to meet those goals. It involves selling your CFO, changing behavior across your organization, and more.
This paper is designed to help you learn from the mistakes of others before you, so you can avoid the common pitfalls of social software, and get fast business value.
Presentation on the evolution of internal communications and the emergence of the social enterprise. Also features tips on how to foster social inside organizations.
The workplace in the digital age. How a digital workplace can support business goals and help bring a shared sense of purpose to an organization. Facts and figures from the 2015 digital workplace survey.
How can companies use their internal communities of practice to collaborate, innovate and grow?
This paper explores the elements of internal on-line community success, and provides examples of how Schneider-Electric addresses this challenge.
Digital Workplace Quick Poll: What's not, what's not!Jane McConnell
Priority topics as voted by 110 organizations worldwide in the July 2013 Quick Poll for the 2014 Digital Workplace Survey.
Lots of food for thought for digital practitioners and their eco-system of partners, consultants, agencies and vendors.
According to Gartner, 70% of social implementations fail because they lack a business purpose. When it comes to harnessing the power of social software, a focus on business value is required. This whitepaper defines a strategic framework for gaining business value from social software. It outlines six successful rollout strategies. Each of the six approaches delivers different business results, and has a different level of risk. And most importantly, each has different requirements to succeed. To be successful with social software, you need to choose the rollout strategy that is best for your organization, and understand its requirements for success.
User Experience (UX) Capacity-Building: A Conceptual Model and Research Agendacraigmmacdonald
Many User Experience (UX) practitioners face organizational barriers that limit their ability to influence product decisions. Unfortunately, there is little concrete knowledge about how to systematically overcome these barriers to optimize UX work and foster a stronger organizational UX culture. This paper introduces the concept of User Experience Capacity-Building (UXCB) to describe the process of building, strengthening, and sustaining effective UX practices throughout an organization. Through an integrated literature review of relevant HCI and capacity-building research, this paper defines UXCB and proposes a conceptual model that outlines the conditions, strategies, and outcomes that define a UXCB initiative. Five areas of future research are presented that aim to deepen our understanding of UXCB as both a practice and an area of scholarship.
Thierry Barsalou - IPSEN CIO - on Traction TeamPage for Competitive Intellige...Traction Software
At the Gilbane Conference, Thierry Barsalou, CIO of IPSEN (a global pharmaceutical company), discusses the benefits of and approach to deploying TeamPage for Competitive Intelligence.
See this on our blog at
http://traction.tractionsoftware.com/traction/permalink/Blog119
Social software lets employees connect and share in new ways, and can dramatically improve the effectiveness of your organization. But social technologies like microblogging, social networking, automated activity feeds, social spreadsheets, wikis, etc. are new to most organizations, and most IT departments don’t have experience with how to successfully implement them.
Success with social software involves a lot more than simply finding the product that best fits your needs. It involves framing the problem appropriately in the first place, defining your business goals, and choosing a rollout methodology designed to meet those goals. It involves selling your CFO, changing behavior across your organization, and more.
This paper is designed to help you learn from the mistakes of others before you, so you can avoid the common pitfalls of social software, and get fast business value.
The value creation process has shifted from an emphasis on tangible things to optimizing intangible things in order to create tangible results. Let’s examine some of the evidence
If you want to succeed in the Social Era then the recipe is to create more value by using assets that create the most value, intangibles. The problem with most organizational leaders is they simply don't know how.
Modeling of symmetrically and asymmetrically loaded reinforced concrete slabsEva Lantsoght
For the assessment of existing structures and the design of new structures, it is important to have a good understanding of the flow of forces, here applied to reinforced concrete solid slabs. Two analyti-cal methods are used: finite element models with 3D solid elements and a plasticity-based model that is suita-ble for hand calculations, the Modified Bond Model. The slabs that are modeled are half-scale models of rein-forced concrete solid slab bridges. As the Eurocode live load model prescribes more heavily loaded trucks in the first lane, the load model is asymmetric. For the finite element models, limited use is made of the redistri-bution capacity of the slab. For the Modified Bond Model, the influence of torsion and the edge effect need to be taken into account. The results of these studies improve the current state-of-the-art for analysis and design of reinforced concrete slabs.
Network effects. It’s one of the most important concepts for business in general and especially for tech businesses, as it’s the key dynamic behind many successful software-based companies. Understanding network effects not only helps build better products, but it helps build moats and protect software companies against competitors’ eating away at their margins.
Yet what IS a network effect? How do we untangle the nuances of 'network effects' with 'marketplaces' and 'platforms'? What’s the difference between network effects, virality, supply-side economies of scale? And how do we know a company has network effects?
Most importantly, what questions can entrepreneurs and product managers ask to counter the wishful thinking and sometimes faulty assumption behind the belief that “if we build it, they will come” … and instead go about more deterministically creating network effects in their business? Because it's not a winner-take-all market by accident.
What's Your LMSs Status? Online Learning Conference 2014Brandon Williams
Has your LMS become irrelevant in your greater learning strategy? Are you employees finding it difficult to use? Do administrators find it old and stodgy or want to get rid of it altogether? Take a look at this presentation (originally prepared for Training Magazine's Online Learning Conference in Chicago on September 23, 2014) for some insight into why you may want to keep your LMS around and how you might be able to transform it into a more useful and usable piece of technology in your portfolio.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
What's Your LMSs Status? Online Learning Conference 2013 (#olc13) session 504v2Brandon Williams
Here's an updated version of the LMSs Status preso shared initially at the Training Magazine Conference and Expo in Orlando back in Feb. The organizers of their online conference reached out to ask that we present in Chicago, so I updated the deck with new info and relevant stats. Enjoy!
How Content Strategy Drives the High Impact Learning OrganizationXyleme
According to research by Bersin, profits from High Impact Learning Organizations (HILO) grew three times faster than other organizations studied. So, what makes some Learning & Development organizations better than others? One core capability is Learning Content Strategy.
In this webinar, David Mallon, VP of Research at Bersin by Deloitte, will dive into the evolving nature of learning content and share findings from Bersin’s recent High Impact Learning Organization report. Joining David will be Michael Miller, Process and Standards Supervisor at Caterpillar, Inc. Together they will discuss how eLearning has become a small part of the larger pie that now includes the delivery of contextual-based content at the right time and in the right format to drive performance outcomes. Key takeaways for Senior Learning & Talent executives will include the methodologies used by HILOs to build a sustainable content strategy that helps companies solve business and operational problems.
A Wall Street Journal article postulates that innovation comes from inside a company through networks—not lone individuals. The authors offers strategies to cultivate innovation, such as making efforts to break down the walls between company departments, rapidly testing and refining ideas, and figure out whether there are people in the chain of command who are hard to work with.
But for most large organizations, this “formula” for innovation is difficult to implement. Change, especially innovative change, is often is met with organizational resistance. Conversely, the culture of the organization often expresses collective frustrations with the limitations of business processes and underlying technologies to support business needs.
Doug Jackson, senior director of the Business Analysis Practice for Robbins Gioia (http://www.robbinsgioia.com), and Paula Pierce, CEO and principal transformation strategist, Peridona Strategies LLC (http://www.periodonastrategies.com), conduct an interactive session on integrating business analysis and organizational change management to create an environment for innovation and successful change. They will examine problems that prevent establishing successful innovation networks and provide an approach using best practices from both disciplines to help organizations harvest and test innovative ideas. They will show you how to:
• Identify the root of change resistance in our organizations
• Identify and capitalize on existing networks
• Apply BA and OCM best practices to create an environment for innovation.
We are social creatures and we crave social interaction. This presentation from SPSNYC is about how we build social solutions to our business problems...today.
June 4, 2015 | 11am-12pm Pacific
Session Description:
We are launching a webinar series to provide a space for practitioners and researchers in both the leadership and network development areas to connect and learn from each other. Often these groups are not connected and we want to build awareness and even collaboration across the research – practice divide. We will focus on the intersection of leadership and network development. After clarifying the various ways in which leadership and networks intersect, we will consider the following questions: what does it mean for people in networks who see the need to be more intentional about developing leadership, and what does it mean for leadership development practitioners to design and deliver programs that better equip their participants to effectively utilize network strategies and tools.
This first webinar will start to explore the intersection between leadership and networks, and introduce a relational perspective of leadership. The three partnering organizations will discuss concrete examples and ideas from their work, and then participants will have a chance to ask questions.
Register for this first webinar with The Center for Creative Leadership, NYU/Wagner, and The Leadership Learning Community
Learn with the Flow: Mission Critical: Leveraging Learning Engineering to Dr...Aggregage
Digital is disrupting every part of an organization's value chain at a record pace, creating a critical need to transform operations and employees' ways of working. Formal training alone can't keep up; it's often too slow, too generic, inconvenient, inefficient, unduly expensive and lacks or lags methods for measuring business-related effectiveness. Trish Uhl show you how to start leveraging Learning Engineering, a multidisciplinary approach that combines modern technology, data analytics, decision science, learning sciences and change management with human-centered engineering design methodologies to ultimately deliver targeted learning outcomes and business results that keep pace with the business and merge learning into the flow of work and lead Digital Adoption.
Translating Results into Actionable InformationJSI
Poster presentation by Amanda Makulec at the 2015 Evaluation Conference in Chicago, IL. She shared insights from an internal initiative to build data visualization capacity across the organization through creating a data viz network, hosting short designstorms, and coaching teams.
Similar to Employee Social Capital: Formation via Social Technologies (20)
EASY TUTORIAL OF HOW TO USE G-TEAMS BY: FEBLESS HERNANEFebless Hernane
Using Google Teams (G-Teams) is simple. Start by opening the Google Teams app on your phone or visiting the G-Teams website on your computer. Sign in with your Google account. To join a meeting, click on the link shared by the organizer or enter the meeting code in the "Join a Meeting" section. To start a meeting, click on "New Meeting" and share the link with others. You can use the chat feature to send messages and the video button to turn your camera on or off. G-Teams makes it easy to connect and collaborate with others!
Telegram is a messaging platform that ushers in a new era of communication. Available for Android, Windows, Mac, and Linux, Telegram offers simplicity, privacy, synchronization across devices, speed, and powerful features. It allows users to create their own stickers with a user-friendly editor. With robust encryption, Telegram ensures message security and even offers self-destructing messages. The platform is open, with an API and source code accessible to everyone, making it a secure and social environment where groups can accommodate up to 200,000 members. Customize your messenger experience with Telegram's expressive features.
Project Serenity is an innovative initiative aimed at transforming urban environments into sustainable, self-sufficient communities. By integrating green architecture, renewable energy, smart technology, sustainable transportation, and urban farming, Project Serenity seeks to minimize the ecological footprint of cities while enhancing residents' quality of life. Key components include energy-efficient buildings, IoT-enabled resource management, electric and autonomous transportation options, green spaces, and robust waste management systems. Emphasizing community engagement and social equity, Project Serenity aspires to serve as a global model for creating eco-friendly, livable urban spaces that harmonize modern conveniences with environmental stewardship.
The Evolution of SEO: Insights from a Leading Digital Marketing AgencyDigital Marketing Lab
Explore the latest trends in Search Engine Optimization (SEO) and discover how modern practices are transforming business visibility. This document delves into the shift from keyword optimization to user intent, highlighting key trends such as voice search optimization, artificial intelligence, mobile-first indexing, and the importance of E-A-T principles. Enhance your online presence with expert insights from Digital Marketing Lab, your partner in maximizing SEO performance.
Your Path to YouTube Stardom Starts HereSocioCosmos
Skyrocket your YouTube presence with Sociocosmos' proven methods. Gain real engagement and build a loyal audience. Join us now.
https://www.sociocosmos.com/product-category/youtube/
Your LinkedIn Success Starts Here.......SocioCosmos
In order to make a lasting impression on your sector, SocioCosmos provides customized solutions to improve your LinkedIn profile.
https://www.sociocosmos.com/product-category/linkedin/
This tutorial presentation provides a step-by-step guide on how to use Facebook, the popular social media platform. In simple and easy-to-understand language, this presentation explains how to create a Facebook account, connect with friends and family, post updates, share photos and videos, join groups, and manage privacy settings. Whether you're new to Facebook or just need a refresher, this presentation will help you navigate the features and make the most of your Facebook experience.
This tutorial presentation offers a beginner-friendly guide to using THREADS, Instagram's messaging app. It covers the basics of account setup, privacy settings, and explores the core features such as close friends lists, photo and video sharing, creative tools, and status updates. With practical tips and instructions, this tutorial will empower you to use THREADS effectively and stay connected with your close friends on Instagram in a private and engaging way.
Surat Digital Marketing School is created to offer a complete course that is specifically designed as per the current industry trends. Years of experience has helped us identify and understand the graduate-employee skills gap in the industry. At our school, we keep up with the pace of the industry and impart a holistic education that encompasses all the latest concepts of the Digital world so that our graduates can effortlessly integrate into the assigned roles.
This is the place where you become a Digital Marketing Expert.
Surat Digital Marketing School - course curriculum
Employee Social Capital: Formation via Social Technologies
1. 1
Blogging and Micro-Blogging Inside a Large, High-
Tech Corporation: Impacts on the Formation of
Organizational Social Capital
Konstanze Alex-Brown, PhD
3. Changes in the
formation of
organizational
social capital
Case Study
Research
Corporate
employee
blog &
micro-blog
INTRODUCTION
3 7/25/2014
4. INTRODUCTION
4 7/25/2014
Why this study?
http://iphonasia.com/?p=2664
Research gap revealed in literature:
How do social media communication technologies used for
internal (employee) communication change the ways in which
organizational social capital is formed? Few studies.
Potential implications:
Find new ways to facilitate
the generation of
organizational social capital
Impact knowledge transfer
efficiency
Impact firm’s ability to
innovate
Change managers’ ability to
foster the creation of
organizational social capital
Change employees’ ability
to pursue common goals
(M&A)
Change employee online
social networks
The perfect storm:
Unique opportunity for research collaboration between industry and academia (Spilka,
Gurak and Hill Duin, Clark, Winsor)
Opportunity to position TC practitioners as communication strategists / leverage
industry insights in TC curriculum (Spilka, Gurak and Hill Duin, Clark, Salvo and Rosinski)
Very recent introduction of social media tools for employee communication at Dell
Dell at forefront of social media use not only in IT industry but also overall
5. INTRODUCTION
5 7/25/2014
Questions guiding this research
1. How do the corporate blog and micro-blog change the ways in
which organizational social capital is generated at Dell?
2. How is the existence of the three dimensions of organizational
social capital reflected in the information product of the two
tools?
3. What are other indicators (beyond those defined in current
scholarship) for measuring an increase in organizational
social capital generated by the blog and micro-blog?
4. How does the formation of social capital as well as information
and knowledge sharing differ on the blog versus on the micro-
blog?
5. From a business perspective, what aspects of the blog and
micro-blog are valued most by Dell’s leadership?
7. LITERATUREREVIEW
7 7/25/2014
• Complement f2f
networks
• Individualized
networks vs.
socialized
communities
• Social communication
tools create ties via
knowledge exchange
• Archived information
product
• Benefits resulting
from social network
relationships
• Firm’s ability to
innovate via improved
knowledge transfer
• People-centric
• Social context
• Motivational
factors
▪ Organizational
knowledge
management
(Lesser, Prusak,
Cohen, Davenport,
Dalkir, Rao, Hackos,
Rockley)
▪ Social capital
▪ Organizational
social capital
(Granovetter,
Coleman, Putnam,
Portes, Burt, Lin,
Nahapiet and
Ghoshal, Tsai and
Ghoshal, Okoli and
Oh)
▪ Online social
structures
(Dal Fiore, Wellman,
Wellman and Gulia,
Gruzd, Takhteyev,
Resnick, Quan-Haase
and Wellman,
Hampton)
▪ Blog
▪ Micro-blog
(Clark, Gurak and
Antonijevic, Hsu and
Lin, Okoli and Oh)
8. 8 7/25/2014
Organizational social capital – three dimensions
Changes in structure
LITERATUREREVIEW
(Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998; Tsai and Ghoshal, 1998)
9. 9 7/25/2014
Changes in relationships
Changes in common paradigm/knowledge
Changes in structure
LITERATUREREVIEW
(Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998; Tsai and Ghoshal, 1998)
Organizational social capital – three dimensions
11. Onlinesurvey
Interviews
Contentanalysis
METHODOLOGY
11 7/25/2014
Web analytics
STRUCTURAL DIMENSION
RELATIONAL DIMENSION
COGNITIVE DIMENSION
Multi-method case study
Follow the person and follow the text (Berkenkotter, 2006)
• content evaluation between 2007 and 2011, final corpus assembly between Februrary and May 2011.
• interviews were conducted between August 2010 and February 2011;
• the online survey was open to collect responses between October 2010 and February 2011;
13. 13
RESULTS/Discussion
7/25/2014
1. Both tools do change the ways in which organizational social
capital is formed at Dell.
2. The tools do this in different ways. Different activity streams
can facilitate different dimensions of social capital.
3. The content analysis is a valuable tool for the measurement
of organizational social capital and communicative instances
can be used as indicators for the generation of organizational
social capital.
4. Results can be used as tools to improve employee social
media communication strategies.
5. Lack in leaders’ ability to articulate the tools’ business value.
Main trends in findings
16. 16 7/25/2014
http://www.networksolutions.com/blog/2009/04/event-review-social-matchbox-dc/
Nick D: Does anybody
know an expert in
virtualization? (1)
Sameer F: @Nick D
check with @Carlos N
from IT (2)
Tom G: We sold a full
data center solution to
a new customer. (1)
Gina A:
@Tom G –
Nice! (2)
Nick D: @Sameer F
thanks! @Carlos N was
very helpful. (3)
Katja B: @Sameer F
your answer helped me
too (4)
(3)
(4)
Dell’s un-moderated micro-blog: facilitating structural
and relational social capitalRESULTS/Discussion
18. 70
60
62
51
30 30
85
81
85
68 67
55
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Invited colleage to
participate
Contacted
colleague based on
their post
Answered
colleague's
question
Forwarded
colleague's
question
Crowdsourced
question
Met f2f with online
contact
blog micro-blog
18 7/25/2014
RESULTS/Discussion Survey results – structural social capital
19. RESULTS
57
68
60
80
62
54
47
80
84
78
85
80
76
69
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Provided needed
information to
colleague
specifically
because he/she
helped me before
Volunteered
information to
help others
Revised posts to
conform to
expectations
Cognizant of
colleagues'
varying
cultural/linguistic
backgrounds
Engaged in
discussions with
colleagues
Found colleagues
with whom I share
professional or
personal interests
Have built
professional
relationship with
colleague based
on online
interactions
blog micro-blog
19 7/25/2014
Survey results – relational social capital
20. RESULTS
47
69
76
64
59
94
52
65
76
67
78
83
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Use Dell language
and acronyms
Reading tool content
improves my
familiarity with Dell
jargon
Reading tool content
improves my
familiarity with Dell
culture
Reading tool content
improves my ability
to do my job
Posted best
practices
Found best practices
blog micro-blog
20 7/25/2014
Survey results – cognitive social capital
21. RESULTS
21 7/25/2014
89
61
72
78
72
100
67
85
62
71
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Have you actively
participated in the tool by
submitting a post or a
comment?
Have you connected with
co-workers because of
information you found in
the tool?
Does the tool help you to
get to know your
colleagues better?
Has your knowledge
about co-workers'
expertise and job
responsibilities changed
since you started using
the tool?
Does participating in the
tool help you gain insight
into the Dell culture?
Blog Micro-blog
Interview results –structural, relational and cognitive
social capital
Structural SC Relational SC Cognitive SC
24. RELEVANCE/OUTLOO
K
24 7/25/2014
Relevance of results for industry and academia
Industry/Dell
Warranted investment in tools that facilitate the generation of
organizational social capital
Tools are not redundant but fulfill different purposes
Targeted improvements to internal social media communication
strategies (activity streams)
Equip managers with tools to foster all three dimensions of
organizational social capital
Improve infrastructure for knowledge sharing (innovation)
Improved understanding of how the blog and micro-blog facilitate
organizational social capital to improve new employee integration
(M&A)
25. RELEVANCE/OUTLOO
K
25 7/25/2014
Relevance of results for industry and academia
Academia/Technical Communication
New knowledge regarding organizational social capital theory from the
perspective of technical communication
New knowledge regarding the use of social communications
technologies inside of a global, high-tech organization. (Gurak and Hill
Duin, 2004)
Position the technical communication practitioner as communication
strategist/leader in digital literacy/pioneer in the digital revolution
(Spilka, 2010)
First-hand insights into use of social communication technologies in
industry help to prepare students for jobs
Content analysis as viable tool for organizational social capital
research
New, early concept for positioning online social structures on a
continuum between purely social and purely individual control
26. RELEVANCE/OUTLOO
K
26 7/25/2014
Study limitations & research opportunities
Limitations
Single case study at one organization
Content analysis was experimental, categories need to be
validated, single content rater
Corpus of data is relatively small, different activity streams or
different data parsing methods could yield different results
Potential bias of researcher (Dell employee)
Research opportunities
Replicate the case study at another organization for validation
Develop content analysis further, refine categories as viable tool for
organizational social capital research
Assess cultural and linguistic impact on tool use
Further develop new concept for positioning online social structures
on a continuum between purely social and purely individual control
28. Anschuetz, L. & Rosenbaum, S. (2002) Chapter 9: Expanding roles for technical communicators. Reshaping technical communication: New directions and challenges for the 21st
century. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Baehr, C., & Alex-Brown, K. (2010b). Assessing the value of corporate blogs: A social capital perspective. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 53, 358-369.
Berkenkotter, C. (2002). Chapter 3: Analysis Everyday Texts in Organizational Settings, 47-65. In Gurak, L. & Lay, M. (Eds.) (2002). Research in technical communication.
Westport, CT: Praeger.
Burt, R. (2005). Brokerage and closure : An introduction to social capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chen, D., & Hu, N. (2007). Corporate blogging and firm performance: An empirical study. International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile
Computing, 1-15, 6158-6161.
Clark, D. (2010). Shaped and shaping tools: The rhetorical nature of technical communication technologies. Digital literacy for technical communication: 21st century theory and
practice. Routledge.
Cohen, D., & Prusak, L. (2001). In good company: How social capital makes organizations work. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
Coleman, J. (1988a). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 94, Supplement: Organizations and Institutions: Sociological and
Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure (1988), 94, S95-S120.
Dalkir, K. (2005). Knowledge management in theory and practice. Amterdam: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
Davenport T. & Prusak, L. (2000). Working knowledge. How organizations manage what they know. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press.
Davidson, E., & Vaast, E. (2007). Tech Talk: An investigation of blogging in technology innovation discourse. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 52(1), 40-60.
Fiore, F. D. (2007). Communities versus networks: The implications on innovation and social change. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 857-866.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973) The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78, 6, 1360-1380.
Gruzd, A., Wellman, B., & Takhteyev, Y. (2011). A research primer for technical communication : methods, exemplars, and analyses. Special issue of the American Behavioral
Scientist on Imagined Communities.
Gurak, L., & Antonijevic, S. (2008c). The psychology of blogging: You, me, and everyone in between. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 60-68.
Gurak, L., & Duin, A. H. (2004). The impact of the internet and digital technologies on teaching and research in technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly,
13(2), 187-198.
Hackos, J. (2007). Information development. Indianapolis: Wiley Publishing Inc.
Hampton, K., & Wellman, B. (2001). Long distance community in the network society: Contact and support beyond netville. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 476-495.
Hsu, C., & Lin, J. (2007). Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Information & Management, 45(1),
65-74.
Lesser, E. & L. Prussak (Eds.) (2004). Creating value with knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press
Lesser, E. (2000). Knowledge and social capital: Foundations and applications. Boston; Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Lin, N. (2008). Social capital : A theory of social structure and action (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Longo, B. (2010). Human + machine culture: Where we work. Digital Literacy for Technical Communication: 21st Century Theory and Practice. Routledge.
Miller, C. & Shepherd, D. (2003) Blogging as social action: A genre analysis of the weblog. Into the Blogsphere: Rhetoric, Community, and Culture of Weblogs.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
Ojala, M. (2005). Blogging: For knowledge sharing, management and dissemination. Business Information Review, 22(4), 269-276.
Okoli, C., & Oh, W. (2007). Investigating recognition-based performance in an open content community: A social capital perspective. Information & Management, 44(3), 240-252.
Portes, A. (1998) Social Capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24
Prusak, L. & Cohen, D. (2001) How to invest in social capital. Harvard Business Review, 79 (6), 86-93, 147.
Prusak, L. (1997). Knowledge in organizations. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Putnam, R. (2000) Blowing alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster:
Rao, M. (Ed.) Knowledge management tools and techniques. (pp. 185-196) Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heineman.Rao, Madanmohan. (2005). Knowledge Management Tools and
Techniques. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heineman.
Rockley, A. (2003). Managing enterprise content : A unified content strategy (1st ed.). Indianapolis IN.: New Riders.
Spilka, Rachel. (2010). Digital literacy for technical communication : 21st century theory and practice. New York: Routledge.
Tsai, W. & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. The Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.
Van Deth, J. (2003). Measuring social capital: Orthodoxies and continuing controversies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6(1), 79-92.
Wellman, B. (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral
Scientist (45), 3, 436 – 455.
Wellman, B., Haase, A. Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community
commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 436-455.
Winsor, D. (2001). Learning to do knowledge work in systems of distributed cognition. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15(1), 5-28.Texas Tech University28
References
30. METHODOLOGY
Texas Tech University30 7/25/2014
Dimensions of organizational social
capital structuring research methods
Dimension of
Organizational
Social Capital
STRUCTURAL Examine whether connections to other
employees can be made via the
blog/micro-blog
RELATIONAL Examine whether relational assets can
change via the use of the blog/micro-blog
COGNITIVE Examine how the blog/micro-blog helps to
build a shared paradigm among users
31. METHODOLOGY
Texas Tech University31 7/25/2014
Research participants / data corpus
Surveyparticipants
Recruitment:
Link to survey
on blog and
micro-blog
Respondents
- 60
Global
Cross-functional
Diverse Dell
tenure
Diverse seniority
Interviewparticipants
Recruitment:
Via email
Interviewees
- Blog 18
- Micro-blog 15
Global
Cross-functional
Diverse Dell
tenure
Diverse seniority
Informationproduct
Blog
- Subset of
monthly activity
stream
Micro-blog
- Daily activity
stream
- Topic
discussion
stream
- Event reporting
stream
32. 1. How do the corporate blog and micro-blog change the ways
in which organizational social capital is generated at Dell?
– Survey, interviews and content analysis confirm changes in structural,
relational and cognitive social capital
› Structural ties are generated by use of both tools via communication based on
content found in the information product
› Relations change via use of both tools
› Common knowledge is generated via use of both tools
2. How is the existence of the three dimensions of organizational
social capital reflected in the information product of the two tools?
– Content analysis shows patterns of communicative activity between
employees that indicate that new connections are formed, relationships are
deepened and common knowledge is created
› directly addressing an individual, seeking a connection with another employee
based on his/her comment or visible subject matter expertise, responding or
acknowledging information being shared, forwarding a another user’s query to
someone who might have the answer, answers to questions (crowdsourcing)
Results: research questions
Texas Tech University32 7/25/2014
RESULTS/Discussion
33. 3. What are other indicators (beyond those defined in current
scholarship) for measuring an increase in organizational social
capital generated by the blog and micro-blog?
– The content analysis is a valuable tool for the measurement of organizational social capital and
communicative instances can be used as indicators for the generation of organizational social
capital.
– Patterns of instances of communicative activity allow for a very detailed assessment of specific
usage models within the tools that cannot be extracted via survey or interview methods.
4. How does the formation of organizational social capital as well
as information and knowledge sharing differ on the blog versus
on the micro-blog?
– Blog: information dissemination with limited author/audience and audience/audience engagement –
great for diffusion of a common paradigm to aide the organization in enabling employees to pursue
common goals
– Micro-blog: making connections, deepening relationships with high employee engagement – very
flexible tool with multiple usage models yielding different levels of organizational social capital
formation
5. From a business perspective, what aspects of the blog and
micro-blog are valued most by Dell’s leadership?
– Very limited responses mostly due to limited understanding of the exact value of the tools.
Assessing the value the leadership places on these tools will take further research.
Results: research questions
Texas Tech University33 7/25/2014
RESULTS/Discussion
34. Texas Tech University34 7/25/2014
Structural
28%
Relational
34%
Cognitive
38%
Survey results: Blog
Structural
33%
Relational
35%
Cognitive
32%
Survey results: Micro-blog
Survey and interview results – relative distribution of structural, relational
and cognitive social capital
Structural
34%
Relational
32%
Cognitive
34%
Interview results: Blog
Structural
36%
Relational
36%
Cognitive
28%
Interview results: Micro-blog
RESULTS/Discussion
Editor's Notes
Social capital theory at the very basic level assigns value to the social connections that people have with one another.
Organizational social capital can be summed up as the benefits resulting from the ties employees form with other employees in the social structure of an organization, often independently of organizational structures.
These benefits can be seen at the individual level and at the organizational level.
Individual level: faster access to information about an internal job opening due to a beneficial tie to another employee can lead to a positive career move
organizational level, the benefit might come in the form of faster access to needed knowledge by employees and, thus, faster task completion times, i.e. greater efficiencies, or, in some cases to faster innovation.
three aspects of social capital: structural, relational and cognitive. All three aspects impact the individual’s behavior within the social structure.
Social capital literature links high levels of social capital to a firm’s increased ability to innovate based on improved communication among employees.
Organizational knowledge management systems, in essence, are designed to improve the knowledge flow inside of an organization to improve efficiencies of work streams and to increase the organization’s ability to be innovative in an economy where knowledge is the primary differentiator in a highly competitive market place.
KM literature indicates a trend of moving away from technology centric, rigid information repositories agnostic of the social context they are to operate in towards people centric systems that are designed to naturally fit in the employees’ work streams and social context.
Social communication technologies like the blog and the micro-blog have been introduced to improve organizational knowledge flow supplementing more traditional KM tools.
Enabling employees to communicate easily and instantly across time zones and geographies, these technologies are far from the rigid document repositories of the past and need yet to be fully understood. The focus of this study can be found at the intersection of organizational social capital, knowledge management and the social communication tools: How do social communication technologies used to improve knowledge flow inside of an organization change the ways in which social capital is formed? The literature indicates a positive correlation between the ability to connect with others online and higher levels of social capital. This study explores this question with respect to the organizational blog and micro-blog used by employees of a large, high-tech organization.
Strategy on inquiry: case study methodology with multiple methods to collect data
Satisfy the unique requirements of this research - two very specific situations at one organization in depth over a period of several months (Creswell, 2003, p. 15; Stake, 1995)
The literature has indicated that organizational social capital research in the corporate environment uses case studies that observe and analyze relatively narrow environments to uncover trends that might hold true beyond the boundaries of the original study.
Case study methodology supports the use of mixed methods to understand the issue under research better to examine processes, activities, or events (Creswell, 2003).
Yin (1994) describes the case study methodology as observations of real life events that are not controlled
Campbell and Fiske in 1959: combining data collection methods to counteract the limitations of each one of these methods (Creswell, 2003).
Organizational social capital research has made successful use of case studies. A case study seeks understanding of current and complex social phenomena by posing ‘‘how’’ and ‘‘why’’ questions. According to Yin (1994), the use of quantitative and qualitative data collection methods allows for triangulation to compare and corroborate the evidence.
Berkenkotter (2002) has advocated for the use of a number of sources to collect relevant data and has stressed that for a researcher, in order to understand how an organization operates, it is equally important to “follow the actors” in a particular organizational environment as it is to “follow the text” (p. 53).
The blog and micro-blog allow for this via easy access to the written records of a multitude of actors facilitated by the digital archive of their textual interactions that span the spectrum of (almost) synchronous to asynchronous and ad hoc to planned interactions. These textual records are open for all employees to search, filter, or browse. They allow insight into the organization’s culture, jargon, processes, and the social action the text carries out.
Highly relevant for the validity of my study’s mixed-methods approach are the following evaluations and conclusion by social capital researchers who call for multi-method approaches.
Widen-Wulf and Ginman (2004) have examined the literature regarding the methods used to measure social capital and have concluded that there are several measures and getting one true measure is unlikely. They trace this back to the slightly varying dimensions and levels of social capital used and the differing perspectives used in analyses.
Importantly, the authors have suggested a context-sensitive approach when examining knowledge sharing from a social capital perspective. These findings have been taken into account in my study which employs a holistic approach in the measurement of organizational social capital.
Van Deth (2002) has called for strengthening the role of empirical evidence (knowledge gained by direct or indirect observation) in measuring social capital and has also stressed the need to develop multi-method research strategies. In addition, Van Deth has warned against relying too heavily on polling strategies to the detriment of other methods, such as experiments and content analyses, etc.
Devine and Roberts (2003) have agreed with Van Deth’s assessment regarding the need for expanded methods to measure social capital that go beyond surveys and polls which traditionally have dominated the field. They have supported Van Deth’s call for multi-method approaches and have emphasized the need for incorporating qualitative methods into social capital research in order to fully understand the complexities at play. Baehr and Alex-Brown (2010) have advocated a mixed-methods approach within a case study setting to explore questions related to organizational social capital research. Based on the results of their study, they have concluded that a more holistic approach in terms of research methodology is better suited to provide valid conclusions. My study builds on learnings from Baehr and Alex-Brown’s study with respect to using a variety of data collection methods, albeit in a study that is upscaled in number of participants and data examined.
The mixed-methods approach allows for robust data triangulation between qualitative (interviews and open-ended survey items) and quantitative data (web analytics and content analysis) as well as triangulation across methods collecting self-reported behavior and methods collecting actual behavior.
data was collected over a 20-month period between July 2009 and February 2011.
Specifically, interviews were conducted between August 2010 and February 2011;
the online survey was open to collect responses between October 2010 and February 2011;
and web analytics and content for the content
Dorothy Winsor (2006), in her long-term study on four engineers’ progression to positions of increased organizational power, Using Writing to Structure Agency: An Examination of Engineers’ Practice, used structured interviews to collect self-reported data on their perception of establishing agency through writing.
interview method with self-reported writing behaviors a trustworthy instrument in an organizational setting within the realm of technical communication, even with a very small number of participants.
The survey is a highly structured form of interviewing because all respondents encounter the same questions in the same form on an internet capable, electronic device, whereas the interview, as I define it for my study, is unstructured. The interview allowed me to probe further and to inject questions not in the original script. It was more flexible overall.
In organizational social capital research, the interview as a data collection method has been used less frequently than is highly structured relative, the survey.
Sherif et al. (2006, p. 799) conducted a case study at a single site to validate their hypotheses related to the positive influence of knowledge management systems (KMS) on an organization’s social capital
collected data via 22 mostly open-ended employee interviews at different organizational levels of an IT consulting firm over a six month period.
a priori coding by multiple coders organized under the three dimensions of social capital: structural, relational, and cognitive.
successful use of open-ended interview questions as a data collection tool in the research of organizational social capital in an IT oriented firm. Theirs also investigated the impact of a communication technology on the formation of social capital, as does my study.
The interview as a method of inquiry is among the most widely used qualitative methods in social research. In fields such as business, academia, and media, (Mann and Stewart, 2000, p. 75), the interview is dominant as a method for conducting systematic social research. Two main subdivisions of interviews are recognized: the standardized or structured interview, and the non-standardized or unstructured interview (Mann and Stewart, 2000).
unstructured interview, there is variance depending on whether the interview is conducted face-to-face or electronically via email or instant message, for example. Often, as in my case, the researcher has to make choices depending on the availability, preference, or location of participants (Holstein and Gubrium, 2003, p.175).
Purposeful sampling: important for this study was that I reach Dell employees who have used the internal blogs and the micro-blog, (Mann and Stewart, 2000, p. 78) rather than solely representative.
Interviewees were recruited from the Global Corporate Communications team, the Marketing and Training teams, the CTO Office team, the HR team, the Product Group and several other functional teams via a recruitment email (see Appendix B). Those employees who agreed to be interviewed and fulfilled the criteria (use of the internal blogs and the micro-blog) had several means of letting me know of their decision to participate. They had the opportunity to email me at Konnie_Brown@dell.com, send me their agreement via instant message or tell me verbally by phone or in person. Interviews were conducted face-to-face, electronically via email or instant message depending on the employees’ availability, location and preference. Interviewees included individuals at different organizational levels with and without managerial responsibilities.
The face-to-face interviews were conducted in Dell team rooms to guarantee privacy (room with door). I recorded the face-to-face interviews (audio only) for transcription purposes and safeguarded in a password protected folder on my Dell laptop. Once fully transcribed, these files were deleted. The transcription was stripped of any data that could identify the participant. All electronic interviews were conducted via the Dell email or instant messaging system with the data hosted on Dell servers within Dell’s firewall. All identifiers of the interviewee were removed.
Dorothy Winsor (2006), in her long-term study on four engineers’ progression to positions of increased organizational power, Using Writing to Structure Agency: An Examination of Engineers’ Practice, used structured interviews to collect self-reported data on their perception of establishing agency through writing.
interview method with self-reported writing behaviors a trustworthy instrument in an organizational setting within the realm of technical communication, even with a very small number of participants.
The survey is a highly structured form of interviewing because all respondents encounter the same questions in the same form on an internet capable, electronic device, whereas the interview, as I define it for my study, is unstructured. The interview allowed me to probe further and to inject questions not in the original script. It was more flexible overall.
In organizational social capital research, the interview as a data collection method has been used less frequently than is highly structured relative, the survey.
Sherif et al. (2006, p. 799) conducted a case study at a single site to validate their hypotheses related to the positive influence of knowledge management systems (KMS) on an organization’s social capital
collected data via 22 mostly open-ended employee interviews at different organizational levels of an IT consulting firm over a six month period.
a priori coding by multiple coders organized under the three dimensions of social capital: structural, relational, and cognitive.
successful use of open-ended interview questions as a data collection tool in the research of organizational social capital in an IT oriented firm. Theirs also investigated the impact of a communication technology on the formation of social capital, as does my study.
The interview as a method of inquiry is among the most widely used qualitative methods in social research. In fields such as business, academia, and media, (Mann and Stewart, 2000, p. 75), the interview is dominant as a method for conducting systematic social research. Two main subdivisions of interviews are recognized: the standardized or structured interview, and the non-standardized or unstructured interview (Mann and Stewart, 2000).
unstructured interview, there is variance depending on whether the interview is conducted face-to-face or electronically via email or instant message, for example. Often, as in my case, the researcher has to make choices depending on the availability, preference, or location of participants (Holstein and Gubrium, 2003, p.175).
Purposeful sampling: important for this study was that I reach Dell employees who have used the internal blogs and the micro-blog, (Mann and Stewart, 2000, p. 78) rather than solely representative.
Interviewees were recruited from the Global Corporate Communications team, the Marketing and Training teams, the CTO Office team, the HR team, the Product Group and several other functional teams via a recruitment email (see Appendix B). Those employees who agreed to be interviewed and fulfilled the criteria (use of the internal blogs and the micro-blog) had several means of letting me know of their decision to participate. They had the opportunity to email me at Konnie_Brown@dell.com, send me their agreement via instant message or tell me verbally by phone or in person. Interviews were conducted face-to-face, electronically via email or instant message depending on the employees’ availability, location and preference. Interviewees included individuals at different organizational levels with and without managerial responsibilities.
The face-to-face interviews were conducted in Dell team rooms to guarantee privacy (room with door). I recorded the face-to-face interviews (audio only) for transcription purposes and safeguarded in a password protected folder on my Dell laptop. Once fully transcribed, these files were deleted. The transcription was stripped of any data that could identify the participant. All electronic interviews were conducted via the Dell email or instant messaging system with the data hosted on Dell servers within Dell’s firewall. All identifiers of the interviewee were removed.