SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1
Appendix A
Table of Contents
Specifications ..................................................................................................................... 1
Gross Weight Calculations ................................................................................................... 2
Wing Loading .................................................................................................................... 4
Cruise wing loading is least value ......................................................................................... 5
Thrust to Weight ................................................................................................................ 6
Mean aerodynamic chord ..................................................................................................... 7
1st CG Estimate ................................................................................................................. 8
2nd CG Estimate (Wing Addition) ........................................................................................ 8
Tail Addition ..................................................................................................................... 9
2nd Wing Placement and Landing Gear Specifications ............................................................ 12
Better Weight Estimates ..................................................................................................... 13
Convergence of Weight Estimates ....................................................................................... 16
Second Performance Analysis ............................................................................................. 18
Time calculations .............................................................................................................. 23
Specifications
clc,clear
% Passengers
% 10 family members (200 lbs.)
% 2 pilots (180 lbs.)
% 1 Flight attendant (180 lbs.)
% Baggage per crew (20 lbs.)
% Baggage per passenger (50 lbs.)
% Total Payload Weight
Wp = 10*200 + 20*3 + 10*50
% Total Crew Weight
Wc = 3*180
% Cruise Specifications
Vcruise = .75 * 659.8 * 5280 / 3600; % ft/s
Hcruise = 40000; % Altitude (ft)
% Stall Specifications
Vstall = 90 * 5280 / 3600; % ft/s
% Range Specifications (PHL to Bankok)
R = 8721 * 5280; % ft
% Loiter Specifications
Vloiter = .6 * 678.1 * 5280 / 3600; % ft/s
Hloiter = 30000; % ft
E = 1800; % seconds
% Rate of Climb Specifications
Appendix A
2
RC = 1500 / 60; % ft/s
% POWER PLANT
% More than 1 Turbofan
% MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS
% Composite Material
% Load Limit Factor Sepcification
n = 4.0;
% Take Off and Landing Distance Specification
% s_T corresponds to Take-Off
% s_L corresponds to Landing
sgT = 6000; % ft
saT = 50; % ft
sgL = 4000; % ft
saL = 50; % ft
% Densities
rho40 = .00058727; % slugs/ft3
rho30 = .00089068; % slugs/ft3
rhoS = .0023769; % slugs/ft3
Wp =
2560
Wc =
540
Gross Weight Calculations
% Jet specific fuel consumptions (sfc) with respect to the cruise and
% loiter mission sections.
% Values are derived form Table 3.3 (Raymer) for high-bypass turbofans
% then converted to from lb/hr/lb to lb/s/lb
Ctcruise = .5/3600; % lb/s
Ctloiter = .4/3600; % lb/s
% Empy weight to gross weight ratio assumed from figure 8.1 (Anderson) for
% an approximate gross weight estimate according to previously designed
% aircraft depending upon their missions. NOTE: all ratios below are
% derived from historical data except for empty-gross.
WeW0 = .45;
W1W0 = .97;
W2W1 = .985;
W5W4 = .995;
Appendix A
3
% B-52 Bomber specificaitons, desired LDmax is 21 while in the loiter
% phase. The loiter phase will see the maximum lift to drag ratio while
% the cruise mission segment will see a slight reduction in the LD
% ratio according to page 22 (Raymer)
LDmaxL = 21;
LDmaxC = (.866).*LDmaxL;
% Cruise mission objective is for maximum range while loiter phase requires
% flying for endurance or specified time.
W3W2 = 1./(exp((R.*Ctcruise)./(Vcruise.*LDmaxC)))
W4W3 = 1./(exp((E.*Ctloiter)./LDmaxL))
W5W0 = W1W0.*W2W1.*W3W2.*W4W3.*W5W4
WfW0 = 1.06.*(1 - W5W0)
denom = 1- WfW0 - WeW0;
% Gross, Fuel and Empty Weights, Fcap = Fuel Capacity
W0 = (Wp + Wc)./denom %lbs
Wf = W0.*WfW0 %lbs
We = .45*W0 %lbs
Fcap = (Wf./5.64)*0.133681 %ft^3
W3W2 =
0.6160
W4W3 =
0.9905
W5W0 =
0.5800
WfW0 =
0.4451
W0 =
2.9566e+04
Wf =
1.3161e+04
Appendix A
4
We =
1.3305e+04
Fcap =
311.9510
Wing Loading
% Wing loading calculations for various mission segments of the flight. The
% The minimum wing loading will be selected.
% Take Off (Stall Velocity)
CL_airfoil = 1.6;
CL_highlift = .9;
CL_max = (CL_airfoil+CL_highlift)*.9
q = (0.5).*rhoS.*(Vstall.^2);
W1S = q.*CL_max
% Landing
g = 32.2;
Radius2 = ((1.23*Vstall)^2)/(.2*32.2);
hf = Radius2*(1-cosd(3));
sa2 = (50 -hf)/tand(3);
sf2 = Radius2*sind(3);
j = 1.15;
N = 3;
Ur = 0.4;
sg2 = sgL - sa2 - sf2;
A = j.*N.*sqrt(2./(rhoS.*CL_max));
B = (j.^2)./(g.*rhoS.*CL_max.*Ur);
C = B.^2;
D = (A.^2) + (2.*sg2.*B);
Z = sg2.^2;
x = [C -D Z];
W2S = roots(x)
% Cruise
Cdo = .012; % Taken from B-52
e = .6; % low wing from McCormick
K = 1./(4*(LDmaxC.^2).*Cdo)
W3S = (Vcruise.^2).*rho40./(2*sqrt((3.*K)./(Cdo)))
Appendix A
5
CL_max =
2.2500
W1S =
46.5920
W2S =
202.5173
115.6891
K =
0.0630
W3S =
38.9767
Cruise wing loading is least value
% Wing loading value selected as minimum from cruise flight and used to
% obtain wing area, and wing span thereafter. The aspect ratio is
% derived from induced drag and oswald efficiency factor.
WSmin = W3S
S = W0./WSmin
AR = 1./(pi.*e.*K)
b = sqrt(AR.*S)
WSmin =
38.9767
S =
758.5505
AR =
8.4220
Appendix A
6
b =
79.9281
Thrust to Weight
% Thrust to weight calculations for various mission segments. The highest
% value is to be selected.
% Take Off
n = 4;
CLadjust = .9*(1.7 + .5);
Radius = (6.96*(Vstall^2))/32.2;
ThetaOB = acosd(1-(50/Radius));
Sa = Radius*sind(ThetaOB);
y = (1.21*W3S)/(32.2*rhoS*CLadjust);
TW1 = y/(sgT - Sa)
% Rate of Climb
TW2 = (RC/Vstall)+(.5*rhoS*(Vstall^2)*(W3S^-1)*Cdo)+((2*W3S*K)/(rhoS*(Vstall^2)))
%Thrust Matching
a = .267;
c = .363;
TW3 = a.*(.75).^c
%Transport Statistical
TW4 = .25
%Sustained Turn
TWt = (.5*rho40*(Vcruise^2)*Cdo/W3S)+((W3S*K*(n^2))/(.5*rho40*(Vcruise^2)))
% Check
TWturnCheck = 2.*n.*sqrt(K.*Cdo)
TWcruiseCheck = 2*sqrt(K.*Cdo)
TW = TW2
T = W0.*TW
TW1 =
0.0578
TW2 =
0.3143
TW3 =
Appendix A
7
0.2405
TW4 =
0.2500
TWt =
0.3016
TWturnCheck =
0.2199
TWcruiseCheck =
0.0550
TW =
0.3143
T =
9.2936e+03
Mean aerodynamic chord
% cT = tip chord length, cR = root chord length, ybar = height of m.a.c.,
% cbar = spanwise location of m.a.c. and taper ratio lambda.
cT = 7.2;
cR = 12;
lambda = 0.6;
ybar = (b./6).*((1+2.*lambda)./(1+lambda))
cbar = (2/3).*cR.*((1+lambda+(lambda.^2))./(1+lambda))
ybar =
18.3169
cbar =
9.8000
Appendix A
8
1st CG Estimate
% Approximate locations and weights of all fuselage components. Used for
% moment calculation. (Refer to the AutoCAD sketch for better
% perspective).
% Engine
x1 = 80.8115;
w1 = 1.4*1644;
% Flight Attendant
x2 = 24.222;
w2 = 180;
% Bathroom
x3 = 28.972;
w3 = 130;
% Fridge & Food/ Drink
x4 = 28.972;
w4 = 400;
% Passengers
x5 = 56.157;
w5 = (10*200);
% Fuel Secondary and crew baggage
x6 = 36.7970;
w6 = 4767.5 + 20*3;
% Electrical System and Fuel Pump
x7 = 43.2970;
w7 = 200;
% Pilots
x8 = 20.472;
w8 = 2*180;
%Passenger Baggage
x9 = 70.342;
w9 = 50*10;
% Total Moment aabout Aircraft Nose
Mn = (x1.*w1) + (x2.*w2) + (x3.*w3) + (x4.*w4) + (x5.*w5) + (x6.*w6)...
+ (x7.*w7) + (x8.*w8) + (x9.*w9);
wn = w1 + w2 + w3 + w4 + w5 + w6 + w7 + w8 + w9;
% First center of gravity without wings
CG1 = Mn./wn
CG1 =
50.1750
2nd CG Estimate (Wing Addition)
% Wing mean aerodynamic center located at fuselage CG1 above
Wwing = (2.5).*S;
WwF = Wwing + (Wf - 4767.5)
Appendix A
9
% Distance from leading edge to aerodynamic center
cbar1 = (.25).*cbar
% Distance between aerodynamic center and the center of gravity
cbar2 = (.4).*cbar - cbar1
% Fuel weight had been incorporated in the wing weight value because of the
% significant amount of weight added to the wings from the fuel. Process
% follows that of Anderson.
CG2 = (Mn + WwF.*(CG1 + cbar2))./(wn + WwF)
WwF =
1.0290e+04
cbar1 =
2.4500
cbar2 =
1.4700
CG2 =
50.8889
Tail Addition
% Horizontal and Vertical tail volume ratios, values were averaged form data
% ranges of aircraft with good stability characterisitcs.
VHT = .5;
VVT = .0425;
% Measuring from the nose of the aircraft, PL = Plane Length, PL2 =
% approximate location of the mean aerodynmic center of the horizontal
% tail.
PL = 90;
PL2 = (.965250965).*PL
% Locations of the horizontal and vertical m.a.c. from the center of
% gravity of the aircraft (wings and fuselage). The horizontal is found
% by subtracting the fuselage/wing combination center of gravity from
% the overall length the Horizontal m.a.c. from the a/c nose.
lHT = PL2 - CG2
lVT = (.934033859).*lHT
Appendix A
10
% The planview area calculations for both horizontal and vertical sections.
SHT = (VHT.*cbar.*S)./lHT
SVT = (VVT.*b.*S)./lVT
% Assumed aspect ratio of the horizontal wing section ARH according to
% Anderson. The horizontal span, root cord length and tip chord length
% calculations are shown below respectively.
ARH = 4;
bt = sqrt(SHT.*ARH)
crt = (2.*SHT)./((lambda + 1).*bt)
ctt = lambda.*crt
% These are the coordinates for the location of the m.a.c. of the
% horizontal tail. cHT is the spanwise distance from the right-most edge,
% while yHT is distance away from the centerline. (Where the mirror of the
% tail occurs)
yHT = (bt./6).*(1 + 2.*lambda)./(1 + lambda)
cHT = (2/3).*crt.*(1 + lambda + (lambda.^2))./(1+lambda)
% Vertical tail section aspect ratio, averaged from data range found on
% page 441 (Anderson)
ARV = 1.65;
Lambda_Vtail = .85;
% In order below, the height of the vertical tail section, root chord
% length, and tip chord length.
hVT = sqrt(ARV.*SVT)
crVT = 2.*SVT./((Lambda_Vtail+1).*hVT)
ctVT = Lambda_Vtail.*crVT
% Similar to the horizontal tail section, cVT is the distance of the m.a.c.
% measured spanwise from the right of the airfoil, while zVT is height
% component of the m.a.c. location.
zVT = (2.*hVT./6).*(1+(2.*Lambda_Vtail))./(1+Lambda_Vtail)
cVT = (2/3).*crVT.*(1 + Lambda_Vtail + (Lambda_Vtail.^2))./(1 + Lambda_Vtail)
PL2 =
86.8726
lHT =
35.9837
lVT =
33.6100
SHT =
Appendix A
11
103.2940
SVT =
76.6663
bt =
20.3267
crt =
6.3521
ctt =
3.8113
yHT =
4.6582
cHT =
5.1876
hVT =
11.2472
crVT =
7.3692
ctVT =
6.2638
zVT =
5.4716
cVT =
Appendix A
12
6.8314
2nd Wing Placement and Landing Gear Specifi-
cations
% Static margin given as 10% (Anderson), calculation of the aerodynamic
% center of the wing body. Followed by calculation of the wing leading
% edge location, Crlead, and wing center location, Xc. NOTE: that Xc
% will be the location of the main landing gear for the aircraft.
% Measurements are made from the nose of the a/c.
SM = 0.1;
Xn = SM.*cbar + CG2;
Xacwing = Xn - VHT
Crlead = Xacwing - cbar1 - ((cR - cbar)./2);
Xc = Crlead + cR./2
Xnose = (0.086872587).*PL
% Distance calculation of each wheel from the known center of gravity (as
% opposed to the nose). Diagram can be seen on page 446 (Anderson). There
% are two location for the focus of all aircraft weight, being the nose and
% main landing gears. The main landing gear consists of a set of 2 wheels
% (left and right) and therefore it is necessary to split the load at that
% between between them.
X3 = Xc - Xnose;
X1 = CG2 - Xnose;
X2 = X3 - X1;
Fm = (W0.*X1)./X3
Fn = (W0.*X2)./X3
% Wheel Dimensions are calculated according to equation 8.82 (Anderson),
% where AD is the A diameter coefficient and AW is the A width
% coefficient, and so-on and so-forth.
AD = 1.51;
BD = 0.349;
AW = 0.715;
BW = 0.312;
% Main wheel diameter and width
MD = (AD.*((Fm./2).^BD))./12
MW = (AW.*((Fm./2).^BW))./12
% Nosewheel diameter and width
ND = (AD.*(Fn.^BD))./12
NW = (AW.*(Fn.^BW))./12
Xacwing =
Appendix A
13
51.3689
Xc =
53.8189
Xnose =
7.8185
Fm =
2.7683e+04
Fn =
1.8832e+03
MD =
3.5081
MW =
1.1673
ND =
1.7488
NW =
0.6265
Better Weight Estimates
%Front Cone Area
Front = pi*4*(4+sqrt(16.472^2+4^2))
%Main Cylinder Area
Center = (2*pi*4*56.476)+(2*pi*4^2)
%Rear Elipse Area
Appendix A
14
Back = pi*8*6.25*17.052
%Total Wetted Area
Wetted_area = Front+Center+Back
%Fuselage Weight
W_Fuselage = Wetted_area*1.4
%Main Wing Weight
W_Wings = 2.5*((7.2*36)+(36*2.4))
% Horizontal Tail Weight
W_HStab = 2*((4.1192*9.9822)+(1.25555*9.9822)+(.5*.9398*6.6303))
% Vertical Tail Weight
W_VStab = 2*((11.5656*5.2855)+(1.7618*11.5656))
% Landing Gear Weight
W_LGear = .057*W0
% W_Engine
W_Engine = 1.4*1644
% Other weight
W_Other = (.1*W0)
% Total Empty Weight
W_Empty = W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_LGear+W_Engine+W_Other
Wf
% Take Off Weight
W_TO = Wc+Wp+Wf+W_Empty
Front =
263.2745
Center =
1.5199e+03
Back =
2.6785e+03
Wetted_area =
4.4617e+03
Appendix A
15
W_Fuselage =
6.2464e+03
W_Wings =
864.0000
W_HStab =
113.5348
W_VStab =
163.0125
W_LGear =
1.6853e+03
W_Engine =
2.3016e+03
W_Other =
2.9566e+03
W_Empty =
1.4330e+04
Wf =
1.3161e+04
W_TO =
3.0592e+04
Appendix A
16
Convergence of Weight Estimates
% Pluged the new W0 weight into the landing gear and other calculations and
% redetermined We (still using WeW0 ratio from the beginning and Wf.
% Repeated 16 times until all three weight values remianed steady.
W_LGear2 = .057*W_TO;
W_Other2 = (.1*W_TO);
W_Empty2 = W_LGear2+W_Other2+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine;
Wf2 = WfW0*W_TO;
W_TO2 = Wc+Wp+Wf2+W_Empty2;
W_LGear3 = .057*W_TO2;
W_Other3 = (.1*W_TO2);
W_Empty3 = W_LGear3+W_Other3+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine;
Wf3 = WfW0*W_TO2;
W_TO3 = Wc+Wp+Wf3+W_Empty3;
W_LGear4 = .057*W_TO3;
W_Other4 = (.1*W_TO3);
W_Empty4 = W_LGear4+W_Other4+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine;
Wf4 = WfW0*W_TO3;
W_TO4 = Wc+Wp+Wf4+W_Empty4;
W_LGear5 = .057*W_TO4;
W_Other5 = (.1*W_TO4);
W_Empty5 = W_LGear5+W_Other5+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine;
Wf5 = WfW0*W_TO4;
W_TO5 = Wc+Wp+Wf5+W_Empty5;
W_LGear6 = .057*W_TO5;
W_Other6 = (.1*W_TO5);
W_Empty6 = W_LGear6+W_Other6+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine;
Wf6 = WfW0*W_TO5;
W_TO6 = Wc+Wp+Wf6+W_Empty6;
W_LGear7 = .057*W_TO6;
W_Other7 = (.1*W_TO6);
W_Empty7 = W_LGear7+W_Other7+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine;
Wf7 = WfW0*W_TO6;
W_TO7 = Wc+Wp+Wf7+W_Empty7;
W_LGear8 = .057*W_TO7;
W_Other8 = (.1*W_TO7);
W_Empty8 = W_LGear8+W_Other8+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine;
Wf8 = WfW0*W_TO7;
W_TO8 = Wc+Wp+Wf8+W_Empty8;
W_LGear9 = .057*W_TO8;
W_Other9 = (.1*W_TO8);
W_Empty9 = W_LGear9+W_Other9+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine;
Wf9 = WfW0*W_TO8;
W_TO9 = Wc+Wp+Wf9+W_Empty9;
Appendix A
17
W_LGear10 = .057*W_TO9;
W_Other10 = (.1*W_TO9);
W_Empty10 = W_LGear10+W_Other10+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine;
Wf10 = WfW0*W_TO9;
W_TO10 = Wc+Wp+Wf10+W_Empty10;
W_LGear11 = .057*W_TO10;
W_Other11 = (.1*W_TO10);
W_Empty11 = W_LGear11+W_Other11+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine;
Wf11 = WfW0*W_TO10;
W_TO11 = Wc+Wp+Wf11+W_Empty11;
W_LGear12 = .057*W_TO11;
W_Other12 = (.1*W_TO11);
W_Empty12 = W_LGear12+W_Other12+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine;
Wf12 = WfW0*W_TO11;
W_TO12 = Wc+Wp+Wf12+W_Empty12;
W_LGear13 = .057*W_TO12;
W_Other13 = (.1*W_TO12);
W_Empty13 = W_LGear13+W_Other13+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine;
Wf13 = WfW0*W_TO12;
W_TO13 = Wc+Wp+Wf13+W_Empty13;
W_LGear14 = .057*W_TO13;
W_Other14 = (.1*W_TO13);
W_Empty14 = W_LGear14+W_Other14+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine;
Wf14 = WfW0*W_TO13;
W_TO14 = Wc+Wp+Wf14+W_Empty14;
W_LGear15 = .057*W_TO14;
W_Other15 = (.1*W_TO14);
W_Empty15 = W_LGear15+W_Other15+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine;
Wf15 = WfW0*W_TO14;
W_TO15 = Wc+Wp+Wf15+W_Empty15;
W_LGear16 = .057*W_TO15;
W_Other16 = (.1*W_TO15);
W_Empty16 = W_LGear16+W_Other16+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine
Wf16 = WfW0*W_TO15
W_TO16 = Wc+Wp+Wf16+W_Empty16
W_Empty16 =
1.4735e+04
Wf16 =
1.4308e+04
W_TO16 =
Appendix A
18
3.2143e+04
Second Performance Analysis
% 2nd analysis gross weight, empty weight, and fuel weight calculations.
W0v2 = W_TO16;
Wev2 = W_Empty16 ;
Wfv2 = Wf16;
% Lowest wing loading value, as well as the wing loading specific to climb,
% to be used in rate of climb calculations.
WSn = W0v2./S
WSclimb = (.97)*(.985).*WSn
% Rate of Climb
% The data series/ arrays shown below are for air densities according
% to their respective altitude, i.e. sea level, h = 0 and rho =
% 2.3769*10^-3. The rate of climb graph is derived from this data
% series being proportionally incorporated into thrut to weight
% caluclations. According to Anderson, as altitude increases, Thrust
% decreases proportional to rho^0.6 for turbofan engines.
rho_series = [2.3769 2.3423 2.3081 2.2743 2.2409 2.2079 2.1752 2.1429 ...
2.1110 2.0794 2.0482 2.0174 1.9869 1.9567 1.9270 1.8975 1.8685 ...
1.8397 1.8113 1.7833 1.7556 1.7282 1.7011 1.6744 1.6480 1.6219 ...
1.5961 1.5707 1.5455 1.5207 1.4962 1.4719 1.4480 1.4244 1.4011 ...
1.3781 1.3553 1.3329 1.3107 1.2889 1.2673 1.2459 1.2249 1.2041 ...
1.1836 1.1634 1.1435 1.1238 1.1043 1.0852 1.0663 1.0476 1.0292 ...
1.0110 .99311 .97544 .95801 .94082 .92387 .90716 .89068 .87443 ...
.85841 .84261 .82704 .81169 .79656 .78165 .76696 .75247 .73820 ...
.72413 .71028 .69443 .67800 .66196 .64629 .63100 .61608 .60150 ...
.58727 .41329 .39147 ] *(10^-3);
Altitude = [0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 ...
6000 6500 7000 7500 8000 8500 9000 9500 10000 10500 11000 11500 ...
12000 12500 13000 13500 14000 14500 15000 15500 16000 16500 ...
17000 17500 18000 18500 19000 19500 20000 20500 21000 21500 ...
22000 22500 23000 23500 24000 24500 25000 25500 26000 26500 ...
27000 27500 28000 28500 29000 29500 30000 30500 31000 31500 ...
32000 32500 33000 33500 34000 34500 35000 35500 36000 36500 ...
37000 37500 38000 38500 39000 39500 40000 47342 48475];
% Varying Thrust to Weight with increasing altitude. Note the sea level RC
% is estimated to be in the upper 90's (ft/s), well over 5400 ft/min
% which is 3.6 times shorter than desired specification.
TWnew = (T./W0v2).*(rho_series./rhoS)
% Equations 5.116 and 5.113 (Anderson) to solve for RCmaximum with 2nd
% analysis wing loading and thrust to weight specifications. The first
% three lines below utilize the data series above to plot a graph of
% the RCmax of the aircraft according to altitude. The following two
% lines of code are used to calculate time to climb using the sea level
Appendix A
19
% values of the array. Linies 413 - 428 combine equations 5.116 and
% 5.113 and then incorporate the change in thurst to weight with
% respect to altitude change. The "combined" equation then set to a
% a specific value of RCmax. According to Anderson, the absolute
% and service ceilings occur when RCmax = 0, 100 ft/min respectively.
% This translates to 0, and 5/3 ft/s. When plugged in and solved, x and
% y yield the absolute and service ceiling densities. Looking in the
% density tables in (Anderson), a corresponding height is found and
% manually typed into Absolute_Ceiling and Servvice_Ceiling below.
% (Values are interpolated by hand). These values were added to the
% arrays above after the fact.
Z = 1 + sqrt(1 + (3./((LDmaxL.^2).*(TWnew.^2))));
RCmax = sqrt((WSclimb.*Z)./(3.*rho_series.*Cdo)).*(TWnew.^1.5).*...
(1 - (Z./6) - (3./(2.*(TWnew.^2).*(LDmaxL.^2).*Z)));
% t_climb_min is converted to minutes
RCmaxSea = RCmax(1,1)
t_climb_min = (Altitude(1,81) - Altitude(1,1))./(RCmax(1,1));
syms x y
AC = solve( sqrt((WSclimb.*(1 + sqrt(1 + (3./...
((LDmaxL.^2).*(((T./W0v2).*(x./rhoS)).^2))))))./(3.*x.*Cdo)).*...
(((T./W0v2).*(x./rhoS)).^1.5).*(1 - ((1 + sqrt(1 + (3./...
((LDmaxL.^2).*(((T./W0v2).*(x./rhoS)).^2)))))./6) - (3./(2.*...
(((T./W0v2).*(x./rhoS)).^2).*(LDmaxL.^2).*(1 + sqrt(1 + (3./...
((LDmaxL.^2).*(((T./W0v2).*(x./rhoS)).^2)))))))) == 0, x);
Absolute_Density = vpa(AC(1,:))
Absolute_Ceiling = 48000 + (48500 - 48000)*((Absolute_Density - .00040045)/...
(.00039099 - .00040045))
SC = solve( sqrt((WSclimb.*(1 + sqrt(1 + (3./...
((LDmaxL.^2).*(((T./W0v2).*(x./rhoS)).^2))))))./(3.*x.*Cdo)).*...
(((T./W0v2).*(x./rhoS)).^1.5).*(1 - ((1 + sqrt(1 + (3./...
((LDmaxL.^2).*(((T./W0v2).*(x./rhoS)).^2)))))./6) - (3./(2.*...
(((T./W0v2).*(x./rhoS)).^2).*(LDmaxL.^2).*(1 + sqrt(1 + (3./...
((LDmaxL.^2).*(((T./W0v2).*(x./rhoS)).^2)))))))) == 5/3 , x);
Service_Density = vpa(SC)
Service_Ceiling = 47000 + (47500 - 47000)*((Service_Density - .00042008)/...
(.00041015 - .00042008))
% Plotting and Marking Ceiling Data
int = 0:1:100;
xx = Altitude(1,82).*(int./int);
yy = Altitude(1,83).*(int./int);
plot(RCmax, Altitude,RCmax(1,83),Altitude(1,83),'rs',RCmax(1,82),...
Altitude(1,82),'ks')
hold on
plot(xx,'k')
plot(yy,'r')
legend('RC vs. Altitude','Absolute Ceiling','Service Ceiling',...
'SC Marker','AC Marker')
Appendix A
20
grid on
xlabel('RCmax (ft/s)')
ylabel('Altitude (ft)')
title('RCmax Vs. Altitude')
axis([0 100 0 50000])
% 2nd Analysis Stall Velocity
Vstalln = sqrt((2./rhoS).*WSn./CLadjust)
% Landing Distance, where grv is gravity, AA is approach angle, Vf is flare
% velocity, R is flight path radius,hF is flare height. Determined valu
% is appr. 61% of the specified value 4000 ft. Well within constraints.
grv = 32.2;
AA = 3;
Vf = (1.23).*Vstalln;
Rv2 = (Vf.^2)./((0.2).*grv)
hF = Rv2.*(1 - cosd(AA))
SA = (50 - hF)./(tand(AA))
SF = (Rv2.*sind(AA))
SG = j.*N.*sqrt((2./rhoS).*WSn./CLadjust) + ...
((j.^2).*WSn./(grv.*rhoS.*CLadjust.*Ur))
SGn = SA + SF + SG
% 2nd Analysis Takeoff Distance, appr. 29% of specified value 6000 ft.
SGT = (1.21).*WSn./(grv.*rhoS.*CLadjust.*TW(1,:))
RR = (6.96).*(Vstalln.^2)./grv
OB = acosd(1 - saT./RR)
SAT = R.*sind(OB)
TOD = SGT + SAT
WSn =
42.3747
WSclimb =
40.4869
TWnew =
Columns 1 through 7
0.2891 0.2849 0.2808 0.2766 0.2726 0.2686 0.2646
Columns 8 through 14
0.2607 0.2568 0.2529 0.2491 0.2454 0.2417 0.2380
Appendix A
21
Columns 15 through 21
0.2344 0.2308 0.2273 0.2238 0.2203 0.2169 0.2136
Columns 22 through 28
0.2102 0.2069 0.2037 0.2005 0.1973 0.1942 0.1911
Columns 29 through 35
0.1880 0.1850 0.1820 0.1790 0.1761 0.1733 0.1704
Columns 36 through 42
0.1676 0.1649 0.1621 0.1594 0.1568 0.1542 0.1516
Columns 43 through 49
0.1490 0.1465 0.1440 0.1415 0.1391 0.1367 0.1343
Columns 50 through 56
0.1320 0.1297 0.1274 0.1252 0.1230 0.1208 0.1187
Columns 57 through 63
0.1165 0.1144 0.1124 0.1103 0.1083 0.1064 0.1044
Columns 64 through 70
0.1025 0.1006 0.0987 0.0969 0.0951 0.0933 0.0915
Columns 71 through 77
0.0898 0.0881 0.0864 0.0845 0.0825 0.0805 0.0786
Columns 78 through 83
0.0768 0.0749 0.0732 0.0714 0.0503 0.0476
RCmaxSea =
97.7624
Absolute_Density =
0.00039147049586455985078970718599533
Absolute_Ceiling =
48474.603812655400139974897115356
Appendix A
22
Service_Density =
0.00041329397068659587824712505735577
Service_Ceiling =
47341.693318902524126111895057413
Vstalln =
134.1931
Rv2 =
4.2304e+03
hF =
5.7977
SA =
843.4309
SF =
221.4038
SG =
1.3875e+03
SGn =
2.4523e+03
SGT =
1.0764e+03
RR =
Appendix A
23
3.8924e+03
OB =
9.1935
SAT =
7.3569e+06
TOD =
7.3580e+06
Time calculations
% Climb Segment
TCmin = (Hcruise - 0)./25
ThetaC = asind(RCmax(1,1)./Vstalln)
Rclimb = 39950./tand(ThetaC)
Appendix A
24
%Glide phase to loiter altitude
Thetamin1 = atan(1./LDmaxL);
Rglidemax1 = (Hcruise - Hloiter)./tan(Thetamin1)
VLDmax1 = sqrt(2*WSn.*sqrt(K./Cdo)./rho40);
VLDactual1 = sqrt(rho40./rho30).*VLDmax1;
Vsink1 = VLDactual1.*sin(Thetamin1);
Tglide1 = (Hcruise - Hloiter)./Vsink1
% Glide Phase 2 to sea level
Thetamin2 = atan(1./LDmaxL);
Rglidemax2 = (Hloiter - 0)./tan(Thetamin2)
VLDmax2 = sqrt(2*WSn.*sqrt(K./Cdo)./rho30);
VLDactual2 = sqrt(rho30./rhoS).*VLDmax2;
Vsink2 = VLDactual2.*sin(Thetamin2);
Tglide2 = (Hcruise - Hloiter)./Vsink2
T_Glide_Total = Tglide1 + Tglide2
% Loiter Time
Tloiter = E
% Cruise Time
Rnew = R - Rclimb - Rglidemax1 - Rglidemax2
Tcruise = Rnew./Vcruise
% Cumulative trip time
T_trip_total = TCmin + + Tcruise + T_Glide_Total + Tloiter
Thrs = T_trip_total./3600
TCmin =
1600
ThetaC =
46.7625
Rclimb =
3.7565e+04
Rglidemax1 =
210000
Tglide1 =
Appendix A
25
450.2751
Rglidemax2 =
630000
Tglide2 =
735.5675
T_Glide_Total =
1.1858e+03
Tloiter =
1800
Rnew =
4.5169e+07
Tcruise =
6.2236e+04
T_trip_total =
6.6821e+04
Thrs =
18.5615
Published with MATLAB® R2013a

More Related Content

What's hot

Airbus Civil Aircraft Design
Airbus Civil Aircraft DesignAirbus Civil Aircraft Design
Airbus Civil Aircraft Design
Baba Kakkar
 
Matlab codes for Sizing and Calculating the Aircraft Stability & Performance
Matlab codes for Sizing and Calculating the Aircraft Stability & PerformanceMatlab codes for Sizing and Calculating the Aircraft Stability & Performance
Matlab codes for Sizing and Calculating the Aircraft Stability & Performance
Ahmed Momtaz Hosny, PhD
 
Thesis_Eddie_Zisser_final_submission
Thesis_Eddie_Zisser_final_submissionThesis_Eddie_Zisser_final_submission
Thesis_Eddie_Zisser_final_submission
Eddie Zisser
 
DA-40 MATLAB results
DA-40 MATLAB resultsDA-40 MATLAB results
DA-40 MATLAB results
Michael Mastromichalis
 
Zivko edge 540 t stability analysis
Zivko edge 540 t stability analysisZivko edge 540 t stability analysis
Zivko edge 540 t stability analysis
Ariann Duncan
 
Aircraft propulsion ideal turbofan performance
Aircraft propulsion   ideal turbofan performanceAircraft propulsion   ideal turbofan performance
Aircraft propulsion ideal turbofan performance
Anurak Atthasit
 
Aircraft propulsion non ideal cycle analysis
Aircraft propulsion   non ideal cycle analysisAircraft propulsion   non ideal cycle analysis
Aircraft propulsion non ideal cycle analysis
Anurak Atthasit
 
3DoF Helicopter Trim , Deceleration manouver simulation, Stability
3DoF Helicopter Trim , Deceleration manouver simulation, Stability 3DoF Helicopter Trim , Deceleration manouver simulation, Stability
3DoF Helicopter Trim , Deceleration manouver simulation, Stability
Deepak Paul Tirkey
 
Aircraft propulsion non ideal turbofan cycle analysis
Aircraft propulsion   non ideal turbofan cycle analysisAircraft propulsion   non ideal turbofan cycle analysis
Aircraft propulsion non ideal turbofan cycle analysis
Anurak Atthasit
 
CE 320 Steel Structures Design Sessional slides
CE 320 Steel Structures Design Sessional slidesCE 320 Steel Structures Design Sessional slides
CE 320 Steel Structures Design Sessional slides
nazifa tabassum
 
Aircraft propulsion non ideal turbomachine 2 d
Aircraft propulsion   non ideal turbomachine 2 dAircraft propulsion   non ideal turbomachine 2 d
Aircraft propulsion non ideal turbomachine 2 d
Anurak Atthasit
 
Water pumping based on wind turbine generation system.
Water pumping based on wind turbine generation system.Water pumping based on wind turbine generation system.
Water pumping based on wind turbine generation system.
Adel Khinech
 
Final Wing design
Final Wing designFinal Wing design
Design and Analysis of Solar Powered RC Aircraft
Design and Analysis of Solar Powered RC AircraftDesign and Analysis of Solar Powered RC Aircraft
Design and Analysis of Solar Powered RC Aircraft
theijes
 
Roof Truss Design (By Hamza Waheed UET Lahore )
Roof Truss Design (By Hamza Waheed UET Lahore )Roof Truss Design (By Hamza Waheed UET Lahore )
Roof Truss Design (By Hamza Waheed UET Lahore )
Hamza Waheed
 
Dmitriy Rivkin Thesis
Dmitriy Rivkin ThesisDmitriy Rivkin Thesis
Dmitriy Rivkin Thesis
Dmitriy Rivkin
 
Water pumping based on wind turbine generation system.
Water pumping based on wind turbine generation system.Water pumping based on wind turbine generation system.
Water pumping based on wind turbine generation system.
Adel Khinech
 
Aircraft propulsion turbomachine 2 d
Aircraft propulsion   turbomachine 2 dAircraft propulsion   turbomachine 2 d
Aircraft propulsion turbomachine 2 d
Anurak Atthasit
 
Final term 2012-2013 D1
Final term 2012-2013 D1Final term 2012-2013 D1
Final term 2012-2013 D1
Ehab AL-Timimi
 

What's hot (19)

Airbus Civil Aircraft Design
Airbus Civil Aircraft DesignAirbus Civil Aircraft Design
Airbus Civil Aircraft Design
 
Matlab codes for Sizing and Calculating the Aircraft Stability & Performance
Matlab codes for Sizing and Calculating the Aircraft Stability & PerformanceMatlab codes for Sizing and Calculating the Aircraft Stability & Performance
Matlab codes for Sizing and Calculating the Aircraft Stability & Performance
 
Thesis_Eddie_Zisser_final_submission
Thesis_Eddie_Zisser_final_submissionThesis_Eddie_Zisser_final_submission
Thesis_Eddie_Zisser_final_submission
 
DA-40 MATLAB results
DA-40 MATLAB resultsDA-40 MATLAB results
DA-40 MATLAB results
 
Zivko edge 540 t stability analysis
Zivko edge 540 t stability analysisZivko edge 540 t stability analysis
Zivko edge 540 t stability analysis
 
Aircraft propulsion ideal turbofan performance
Aircraft propulsion   ideal turbofan performanceAircraft propulsion   ideal turbofan performance
Aircraft propulsion ideal turbofan performance
 
Aircraft propulsion non ideal cycle analysis
Aircraft propulsion   non ideal cycle analysisAircraft propulsion   non ideal cycle analysis
Aircraft propulsion non ideal cycle analysis
 
3DoF Helicopter Trim , Deceleration manouver simulation, Stability
3DoF Helicopter Trim , Deceleration manouver simulation, Stability 3DoF Helicopter Trim , Deceleration manouver simulation, Stability
3DoF Helicopter Trim , Deceleration manouver simulation, Stability
 
Aircraft propulsion non ideal turbofan cycle analysis
Aircraft propulsion   non ideal turbofan cycle analysisAircraft propulsion   non ideal turbofan cycle analysis
Aircraft propulsion non ideal turbofan cycle analysis
 
CE 320 Steel Structures Design Sessional slides
CE 320 Steel Structures Design Sessional slidesCE 320 Steel Structures Design Sessional slides
CE 320 Steel Structures Design Sessional slides
 
Aircraft propulsion non ideal turbomachine 2 d
Aircraft propulsion   non ideal turbomachine 2 dAircraft propulsion   non ideal turbomachine 2 d
Aircraft propulsion non ideal turbomachine 2 d
 
Water pumping based on wind turbine generation system.
Water pumping based on wind turbine generation system.Water pumping based on wind turbine generation system.
Water pumping based on wind turbine generation system.
 
Final Wing design
Final Wing designFinal Wing design
Final Wing design
 
Design and Analysis of Solar Powered RC Aircraft
Design and Analysis of Solar Powered RC AircraftDesign and Analysis of Solar Powered RC Aircraft
Design and Analysis of Solar Powered RC Aircraft
 
Roof Truss Design (By Hamza Waheed UET Lahore )
Roof Truss Design (By Hamza Waheed UET Lahore )Roof Truss Design (By Hamza Waheed UET Lahore )
Roof Truss Design (By Hamza Waheed UET Lahore )
 
Dmitriy Rivkin Thesis
Dmitriy Rivkin ThesisDmitriy Rivkin Thesis
Dmitriy Rivkin Thesis
 
Water pumping based on wind turbine generation system.
Water pumping based on wind turbine generation system.Water pumping based on wind turbine generation system.
Water pumping based on wind turbine generation system.
 
Aircraft propulsion turbomachine 2 d
Aircraft propulsion   turbomachine 2 dAircraft propulsion   turbomachine 2 d
Aircraft propulsion turbomachine 2 d
 
Final term 2012-2013 D1
Final term 2012-2013 D1Final term 2012-2013 D1
Final term 2012-2013 D1
 

Similar to Aircraft Performance and Design Project Code

Flywheel
FlywheelFlywheel
report_2_v2
report_2_v2report_2_v2
report_2_v2
Islam Mansour
 
Fighter jet Swept back wing design and Analysis by using of Xflr5
Fighter jet Swept back wing design  and Analysis by using of Xflr5Fighter jet Swept back wing design  and Analysis by using of Xflr5
Fighter jet Swept back wing design and Analysis by using of Xflr5
Mani5436
 
Hydrostatics and stability
Hydrostatics and stabilityHydrostatics and stability
Hydrostatics and stability
João Henrique Volpini Mattos
 
Electric_Propeller_Aircraft_Sizing.pptx
Electric_Propeller_Aircraft_Sizing.pptxElectric_Propeller_Aircraft_Sizing.pptx
Electric_Propeller_Aircraft_Sizing.pptx
ssuser425dc3
 
Aircraft design lab report converted
Aircraft design lab report convertedAircraft design lab report converted
Aircraft design lab report converted
Pramod Yadav
 
Vehicle Testing and Data Analysis
Vehicle Testing and Data AnalysisVehicle Testing and Data Analysis
Vehicle Testing and Data Analysis
Benjamin Labrosse
 
RC Plane and Aerofoil Design bst - CACULATIONS 2-1-1 (1).pdf
RC Plane and Aerofoil Design bst - CACULATIONS 2-1-1 (1).pdfRC Plane and Aerofoil Design bst - CACULATIONS 2-1-1 (1).pdf
RC Plane and Aerofoil Design bst - CACULATIONS 2-1-1 (1).pdf
PriyanshuYadav501002
 
Take Off And Landing Performance
Take Off And Landing PerformanceTake Off And Landing Performance
Take Off And Landing Performance
ahmad bassiouny
 
Total energy optimization in F3J glider towing
Total energy optimization in F3J glider towingTotal energy optimization in F3J glider towing
Total energy optimization in F3J glider towing
Francesco Meschia
 
IRJET- Design and Development of Open Differential for Transmission System of...
IRJET- Design and Development of Open Differential for Transmission System of...IRJET- Design and Development of Open Differential for Transmission System of...
IRJET- Design and Development of Open Differential for Transmission System of...
IRJET Journal
 
SELECTION AND ANALYSIS OF AN AIRFOIL FOR FIXED WING MICRO UNMANNED AERIAL VEH...
SELECTION AND ANALYSIS OF AN AIRFOIL FOR FIXED WING MICRO UNMANNED AERIAL VEH...SELECTION AND ANALYSIS OF AN AIRFOIL FOR FIXED WING MICRO UNMANNED AERIAL VEH...
SELECTION AND ANALYSIS OF AN AIRFOIL FOR FIXED WING MICRO UNMANNED AERIAL VEH...
IRJET Journal
 
Aircraft Design Proposal 2016
Aircraft Design Proposal 2016Aircraft Design Proposal 2016
Aircraft Design Proposal 2016
Francisco Davila
 
V8N3-6.PDF
V8N3-6.PDFV8N3-6.PDF
V8N3-6.PDF
Ram Mohan
 
Consider a 4-Link robot manipulator shown below. Use the forward kine.pdf
Consider a 4-Link robot manipulator shown below. Use the forward kine.pdfConsider a 4-Link robot manipulator shown below. Use the forward kine.pdf
Consider a 4-Link robot manipulator shown below. Use the forward kine.pdf
meerobertsonheyde608
 
Structures proyect
Structures proyectStructures proyect
Structures proyect
Carlos J Gutierrez
 
Girth flange load calculation using by fea techniques
Girth flange load calculation using by fea techniquesGirth flange load calculation using by fea techniques
Girth flange load calculation using by fea techniques
Kingston Rivington
 
E0314033040
E0314033040E0314033040
E0314033040
theijes
 
Mini Project - STRUCTURAL-ANALYSIS-AND-MATERIAL-SELECTION
Mini Project - STRUCTURAL-ANALYSIS-AND-MATERIAL-SELECTIONMini Project - STRUCTURAL-ANALYSIS-AND-MATERIAL-SELECTION
Mini Project - STRUCTURAL-ANALYSIS-AND-MATERIAL-SELECTION
dna1992
 
pdf-22-autoflight-a320-training-manual_compress.pdf
pdf-22-autoflight-a320-training-manual_compress.pdfpdf-22-autoflight-a320-training-manual_compress.pdf
pdf-22-autoflight-a320-training-manual_compress.pdf
MuhammadJawad192750
 

Similar to Aircraft Performance and Design Project Code (20)

Flywheel
FlywheelFlywheel
Flywheel
 
report_2_v2
report_2_v2report_2_v2
report_2_v2
 
Fighter jet Swept back wing design and Analysis by using of Xflr5
Fighter jet Swept back wing design  and Analysis by using of Xflr5Fighter jet Swept back wing design  and Analysis by using of Xflr5
Fighter jet Swept back wing design and Analysis by using of Xflr5
 
Hydrostatics and stability
Hydrostatics and stabilityHydrostatics and stability
Hydrostatics and stability
 
Electric_Propeller_Aircraft_Sizing.pptx
Electric_Propeller_Aircraft_Sizing.pptxElectric_Propeller_Aircraft_Sizing.pptx
Electric_Propeller_Aircraft_Sizing.pptx
 
Aircraft design lab report converted
Aircraft design lab report convertedAircraft design lab report converted
Aircraft design lab report converted
 
Vehicle Testing and Data Analysis
Vehicle Testing and Data AnalysisVehicle Testing and Data Analysis
Vehicle Testing and Data Analysis
 
RC Plane and Aerofoil Design bst - CACULATIONS 2-1-1 (1).pdf
RC Plane and Aerofoil Design bst - CACULATIONS 2-1-1 (1).pdfRC Plane and Aerofoil Design bst - CACULATIONS 2-1-1 (1).pdf
RC Plane and Aerofoil Design bst - CACULATIONS 2-1-1 (1).pdf
 
Take Off And Landing Performance
Take Off And Landing PerformanceTake Off And Landing Performance
Take Off And Landing Performance
 
Total energy optimization in F3J glider towing
Total energy optimization in F3J glider towingTotal energy optimization in F3J glider towing
Total energy optimization in F3J glider towing
 
IRJET- Design and Development of Open Differential for Transmission System of...
IRJET- Design and Development of Open Differential for Transmission System of...IRJET- Design and Development of Open Differential for Transmission System of...
IRJET- Design and Development of Open Differential for Transmission System of...
 
SELECTION AND ANALYSIS OF AN AIRFOIL FOR FIXED WING MICRO UNMANNED AERIAL VEH...
SELECTION AND ANALYSIS OF AN AIRFOIL FOR FIXED WING MICRO UNMANNED AERIAL VEH...SELECTION AND ANALYSIS OF AN AIRFOIL FOR FIXED WING MICRO UNMANNED AERIAL VEH...
SELECTION AND ANALYSIS OF AN AIRFOIL FOR FIXED WING MICRO UNMANNED AERIAL VEH...
 
Aircraft Design Proposal 2016
Aircraft Design Proposal 2016Aircraft Design Proposal 2016
Aircraft Design Proposal 2016
 
V8N3-6.PDF
V8N3-6.PDFV8N3-6.PDF
V8N3-6.PDF
 
Consider a 4-Link robot manipulator shown below. Use the forward kine.pdf
Consider a 4-Link robot manipulator shown below. Use the forward kine.pdfConsider a 4-Link robot manipulator shown below. Use the forward kine.pdf
Consider a 4-Link robot manipulator shown below. Use the forward kine.pdf
 
Structures proyect
Structures proyectStructures proyect
Structures proyect
 
Girth flange load calculation using by fea techniques
Girth flange load calculation using by fea techniquesGirth flange load calculation using by fea techniques
Girth flange load calculation using by fea techniques
 
E0314033040
E0314033040E0314033040
E0314033040
 
Mini Project - STRUCTURAL-ANALYSIS-AND-MATERIAL-SELECTION
Mini Project - STRUCTURAL-ANALYSIS-AND-MATERIAL-SELECTIONMini Project - STRUCTURAL-ANALYSIS-AND-MATERIAL-SELECTION
Mini Project - STRUCTURAL-ANALYSIS-AND-MATERIAL-SELECTION
 
pdf-22-autoflight-a320-training-manual_compress.pdf
pdf-22-autoflight-a320-training-manual_compress.pdfpdf-22-autoflight-a320-training-manual_compress.pdf
pdf-22-autoflight-a320-training-manual_compress.pdf
 

Aircraft Performance and Design Project Code

  • 1. 1 Appendix A Table of Contents Specifications ..................................................................................................................... 1 Gross Weight Calculations ................................................................................................... 2 Wing Loading .................................................................................................................... 4 Cruise wing loading is least value ......................................................................................... 5 Thrust to Weight ................................................................................................................ 6 Mean aerodynamic chord ..................................................................................................... 7 1st CG Estimate ................................................................................................................. 8 2nd CG Estimate (Wing Addition) ........................................................................................ 8 Tail Addition ..................................................................................................................... 9 2nd Wing Placement and Landing Gear Specifications ............................................................ 12 Better Weight Estimates ..................................................................................................... 13 Convergence of Weight Estimates ....................................................................................... 16 Second Performance Analysis ............................................................................................. 18 Time calculations .............................................................................................................. 23 Specifications clc,clear % Passengers % 10 family members (200 lbs.) % 2 pilots (180 lbs.) % 1 Flight attendant (180 lbs.) % Baggage per crew (20 lbs.) % Baggage per passenger (50 lbs.) % Total Payload Weight Wp = 10*200 + 20*3 + 10*50 % Total Crew Weight Wc = 3*180 % Cruise Specifications Vcruise = .75 * 659.8 * 5280 / 3600; % ft/s Hcruise = 40000; % Altitude (ft) % Stall Specifications Vstall = 90 * 5280 / 3600; % ft/s % Range Specifications (PHL to Bankok) R = 8721 * 5280; % ft % Loiter Specifications Vloiter = .6 * 678.1 * 5280 / 3600; % ft/s Hloiter = 30000; % ft E = 1800; % seconds % Rate of Climb Specifications
  • 2. Appendix A 2 RC = 1500 / 60; % ft/s % POWER PLANT % More than 1 Turbofan % MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS % Composite Material % Load Limit Factor Sepcification n = 4.0; % Take Off and Landing Distance Specification % s_T corresponds to Take-Off % s_L corresponds to Landing sgT = 6000; % ft saT = 50; % ft sgL = 4000; % ft saL = 50; % ft % Densities rho40 = .00058727; % slugs/ft3 rho30 = .00089068; % slugs/ft3 rhoS = .0023769; % slugs/ft3 Wp = 2560 Wc = 540 Gross Weight Calculations % Jet specific fuel consumptions (sfc) with respect to the cruise and % loiter mission sections. % Values are derived form Table 3.3 (Raymer) for high-bypass turbofans % then converted to from lb/hr/lb to lb/s/lb Ctcruise = .5/3600; % lb/s Ctloiter = .4/3600; % lb/s % Empy weight to gross weight ratio assumed from figure 8.1 (Anderson) for % an approximate gross weight estimate according to previously designed % aircraft depending upon their missions. NOTE: all ratios below are % derived from historical data except for empty-gross. WeW0 = .45; W1W0 = .97; W2W1 = .985; W5W4 = .995;
  • 3. Appendix A 3 % B-52 Bomber specificaitons, desired LDmax is 21 while in the loiter % phase. The loiter phase will see the maximum lift to drag ratio while % the cruise mission segment will see a slight reduction in the LD % ratio according to page 22 (Raymer) LDmaxL = 21; LDmaxC = (.866).*LDmaxL; % Cruise mission objective is for maximum range while loiter phase requires % flying for endurance or specified time. W3W2 = 1./(exp((R.*Ctcruise)./(Vcruise.*LDmaxC))) W4W3 = 1./(exp((E.*Ctloiter)./LDmaxL)) W5W0 = W1W0.*W2W1.*W3W2.*W4W3.*W5W4 WfW0 = 1.06.*(1 - W5W0) denom = 1- WfW0 - WeW0; % Gross, Fuel and Empty Weights, Fcap = Fuel Capacity W0 = (Wp + Wc)./denom %lbs Wf = W0.*WfW0 %lbs We = .45*W0 %lbs Fcap = (Wf./5.64)*0.133681 %ft^3 W3W2 = 0.6160 W4W3 = 0.9905 W5W0 = 0.5800 WfW0 = 0.4451 W0 = 2.9566e+04 Wf = 1.3161e+04
  • 4. Appendix A 4 We = 1.3305e+04 Fcap = 311.9510 Wing Loading % Wing loading calculations for various mission segments of the flight. The % The minimum wing loading will be selected. % Take Off (Stall Velocity) CL_airfoil = 1.6; CL_highlift = .9; CL_max = (CL_airfoil+CL_highlift)*.9 q = (0.5).*rhoS.*(Vstall.^2); W1S = q.*CL_max % Landing g = 32.2; Radius2 = ((1.23*Vstall)^2)/(.2*32.2); hf = Radius2*(1-cosd(3)); sa2 = (50 -hf)/tand(3); sf2 = Radius2*sind(3); j = 1.15; N = 3; Ur = 0.4; sg2 = sgL - sa2 - sf2; A = j.*N.*sqrt(2./(rhoS.*CL_max)); B = (j.^2)./(g.*rhoS.*CL_max.*Ur); C = B.^2; D = (A.^2) + (2.*sg2.*B); Z = sg2.^2; x = [C -D Z]; W2S = roots(x) % Cruise Cdo = .012; % Taken from B-52 e = .6; % low wing from McCormick K = 1./(4*(LDmaxC.^2).*Cdo) W3S = (Vcruise.^2).*rho40./(2*sqrt((3.*K)./(Cdo)))
  • 5. Appendix A 5 CL_max = 2.2500 W1S = 46.5920 W2S = 202.5173 115.6891 K = 0.0630 W3S = 38.9767 Cruise wing loading is least value % Wing loading value selected as minimum from cruise flight and used to % obtain wing area, and wing span thereafter. The aspect ratio is % derived from induced drag and oswald efficiency factor. WSmin = W3S S = W0./WSmin AR = 1./(pi.*e.*K) b = sqrt(AR.*S) WSmin = 38.9767 S = 758.5505 AR = 8.4220
  • 6. Appendix A 6 b = 79.9281 Thrust to Weight % Thrust to weight calculations for various mission segments. The highest % value is to be selected. % Take Off n = 4; CLadjust = .9*(1.7 + .5); Radius = (6.96*(Vstall^2))/32.2; ThetaOB = acosd(1-(50/Radius)); Sa = Radius*sind(ThetaOB); y = (1.21*W3S)/(32.2*rhoS*CLadjust); TW1 = y/(sgT - Sa) % Rate of Climb TW2 = (RC/Vstall)+(.5*rhoS*(Vstall^2)*(W3S^-1)*Cdo)+((2*W3S*K)/(rhoS*(Vstall^2))) %Thrust Matching a = .267; c = .363; TW3 = a.*(.75).^c %Transport Statistical TW4 = .25 %Sustained Turn TWt = (.5*rho40*(Vcruise^2)*Cdo/W3S)+((W3S*K*(n^2))/(.5*rho40*(Vcruise^2))) % Check TWturnCheck = 2.*n.*sqrt(K.*Cdo) TWcruiseCheck = 2*sqrt(K.*Cdo) TW = TW2 T = W0.*TW TW1 = 0.0578 TW2 = 0.3143 TW3 =
  • 7. Appendix A 7 0.2405 TW4 = 0.2500 TWt = 0.3016 TWturnCheck = 0.2199 TWcruiseCheck = 0.0550 TW = 0.3143 T = 9.2936e+03 Mean aerodynamic chord % cT = tip chord length, cR = root chord length, ybar = height of m.a.c., % cbar = spanwise location of m.a.c. and taper ratio lambda. cT = 7.2; cR = 12; lambda = 0.6; ybar = (b./6).*((1+2.*lambda)./(1+lambda)) cbar = (2/3).*cR.*((1+lambda+(lambda.^2))./(1+lambda)) ybar = 18.3169 cbar = 9.8000
  • 8. Appendix A 8 1st CG Estimate % Approximate locations and weights of all fuselage components. Used for % moment calculation. (Refer to the AutoCAD sketch for better % perspective). % Engine x1 = 80.8115; w1 = 1.4*1644; % Flight Attendant x2 = 24.222; w2 = 180; % Bathroom x3 = 28.972; w3 = 130; % Fridge & Food/ Drink x4 = 28.972; w4 = 400; % Passengers x5 = 56.157; w5 = (10*200); % Fuel Secondary and crew baggage x6 = 36.7970; w6 = 4767.5 + 20*3; % Electrical System and Fuel Pump x7 = 43.2970; w7 = 200; % Pilots x8 = 20.472; w8 = 2*180; %Passenger Baggage x9 = 70.342; w9 = 50*10; % Total Moment aabout Aircraft Nose Mn = (x1.*w1) + (x2.*w2) + (x3.*w3) + (x4.*w4) + (x5.*w5) + (x6.*w6)... + (x7.*w7) + (x8.*w8) + (x9.*w9); wn = w1 + w2 + w3 + w4 + w5 + w6 + w7 + w8 + w9; % First center of gravity without wings CG1 = Mn./wn CG1 = 50.1750 2nd CG Estimate (Wing Addition) % Wing mean aerodynamic center located at fuselage CG1 above Wwing = (2.5).*S; WwF = Wwing + (Wf - 4767.5)
  • 9. Appendix A 9 % Distance from leading edge to aerodynamic center cbar1 = (.25).*cbar % Distance between aerodynamic center and the center of gravity cbar2 = (.4).*cbar - cbar1 % Fuel weight had been incorporated in the wing weight value because of the % significant amount of weight added to the wings from the fuel. Process % follows that of Anderson. CG2 = (Mn + WwF.*(CG1 + cbar2))./(wn + WwF) WwF = 1.0290e+04 cbar1 = 2.4500 cbar2 = 1.4700 CG2 = 50.8889 Tail Addition % Horizontal and Vertical tail volume ratios, values were averaged form data % ranges of aircraft with good stability characterisitcs. VHT = .5; VVT = .0425; % Measuring from the nose of the aircraft, PL = Plane Length, PL2 = % approximate location of the mean aerodynmic center of the horizontal % tail. PL = 90; PL2 = (.965250965).*PL % Locations of the horizontal and vertical m.a.c. from the center of % gravity of the aircraft (wings and fuselage). The horizontal is found % by subtracting the fuselage/wing combination center of gravity from % the overall length the Horizontal m.a.c. from the a/c nose. lHT = PL2 - CG2 lVT = (.934033859).*lHT
  • 10. Appendix A 10 % The planview area calculations for both horizontal and vertical sections. SHT = (VHT.*cbar.*S)./lHT SVT = (VVT.*b.*S)./lVT % Assumed aspect ratio of the horizontal wing section ARH according to % Anderson. The horizontal span, root cord length and tip chord length % calculations are shown below respectively. ARH = 4; bt = sqrt(SHT.*ARH) crt = (2.*SHT)./((lambda + 1).*bt) ctt = lambda.*crt % These are the coordinates for the location of the m.a.c. of the % horizontal tail. cHT is the spanwise distance from the right-most edge, % while yHT is distance away from the centerline. (Where the mirror of the % tail occurs) yHT = (bt./6).*(1 + 2.*lambda)./(1 + lambda) cHT = (2/3).*crt.*(1 + lambda + (lambda.^2))./(1+lambda) % Vertical tail section aspect ratio, averaged from data range found on % page 441 (Anderson) ARV = 1.65; Lambda_Vtail = .85; % In order below, the height of the vertical tail section, root chord % length, and tip chord length. hVT = sqrt(ARV.*SVT) crVT = 2.*SVT./((Lambda_Vtail+1).*hVT) ctVT = Lambda_Vtail.*crVT % Similar to the horizontal tail section, cVT is the distance of the m.a.c. % measured spanwise from the right of the airfoil, while zVT is height % component of the m.a.c. location. zVT = (2.*hVT./6).*(1+(2.*Lambda_Vtail))./(1+Lambda_Vtail) cVT = (2/3).*crVT.*(1 + Lambda_Vtail + (Lambda_Vtail.^2))./(1 + Lambda_Vtail) PL2 = 86.8726 lHT = 35.9837 lVT = 33.6100 SHT =
  • 11. Appendix A 11 103.2940 SVT = 76.6663 bt = 20.3267 crt = 6.3521 ctt = 3.8113 yHT = 4.6582 cHT = 5.1876 hVT = 11.2472 crVT = 7.3692 ctVT = 6.2638 zVT = 5.4716 cVT =
  • 12. Appendix A 12 6.8314 2nd Wing Placement and Landing Gear Specifi- cations % Static margin given as 10% (Anderson), calculation of the aerodynamic % center of the wing body. Followed by calculation of the wing leading % edge location, Crlead, and wing center location, Xc. NOTE: that Xc % will be the location of the main landing gear for the aircraft. % Measurements are made from the nose of the a/c. SM = 0.1; Xn = SM.*cbar + CG2; Xacwing = Xn - VHT Crlead = Xacwing - cbar1 - ((cR - cbar)./2); Xc = Crlead + cR./2 Xnose = (0.086872587).*PL % Distance calculation of each wheel from the known center of gravity (as % opposed to the nose). Diagram can be seen on page 446 (Anderson). There % are two location for the focus of all aircraft weight, being the nose and % main landing gears. The main landing gear consists of a set of 2 wheels % (left and right) and therefore it is necessary to split the load at that % between between them. X3 = Xc - Xnose; X1 = CG2 - Xnose; X2 = X3 - X1; Fm = (W0.*X1)./X3 Fn = (W0.*X2)./X3 % Wheel Dimensions are calculated according to equation 8.82 (Anderson), % where AD is the A diameter coefficient and AW is the A width % coefficient, and so-on and so-forth. AD = 1.51; BD = 0.349; AW = 0.715; BW = 0.312; % Main wheel diameter and width MD = (AD.*((Fm./2).^BD))./12 MW = (AW.*((Fm./2).^BW))./12 % Nosewheel diameter and width ND = (AD.*(Fn.^BD))./12 NW = (AW.*(Fn.^BW))./12 Xacwing =
  • 13. Appendix A 13 51.3689 Xc = 53.8189 Xnose = 7.8185 Fm = 2.7683e+04 Fn = 1.8832e+03 MD = 3.5081 MW = 1.1673 ND = 1.7488 NW = 0.6265 Better Weight Estimates %Front Cone Area Front = pi*4*(4+sqrt(16.472^2+4^2)) %Main Cylinder Area Center = (2*pi*4*56.476)+(2*pi*4^2) %Rear Elipse Area
  • 14. Appendix A 14 Back = pi*8*6.25*17.052 %Total Wetted Area Wetted_area = Front+Center+Back %Fuselage Weight W_Fuselage = Wetted_area*1.4 %Main Wing Weight W_Wings = 2.5*((7.2*36)+(36*2.4)) % Horizontal Tail Weight W_HStab = 2*((4.1192*9.9822)+(1.25555*9.9822)+(.5*.9398*6.6303)) % Vertical Tail Weight W_VStab = 2*((11.5656*5.2855)+(1.7618*11.5656)) % Landing Gear Weight W_LGear = .057*W0 % W_Engine W_Engine = 1.4*1644 % Other weight W_Other = (.1*W0) % Total Empty Weight W_Empty = W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_LGear+W_Engine+W_Other Wf % Take Off Weight W_TO = Wc+Wp+Wf+W_Empty Front = 263.2745 Center = 1.5199e+03 Back = 2.6785e+03 Wetted_area = 4.4617e+03
  • 15. Appendix A 15 W_Fuselage = 6.2464e+03 W_Wings = 864.0000 W_HStab = 113.5348 W_VStab = 163.0125 W_LGear = 1.6853e+03 W_Engine = 2.3016e+03 W_Other = 2.9566e+03 W_Empty = 1.4330e+04 Wf = 1.3161e+04 W_TO = 3.0592e+04
  • 16. Appendix A 16 Convergence of Weight Estimates % Pluged the new W0 weight into the landing gear and other calculations and % redetermined We (still using WeW0 ratio from the beginning and Wf. % Repeated 16 times until all three weight values remianed steady. W_LGear2 = .057*W_TO; W_Other2 = (.1*W_TO); W_Empty2 = W_LGear2+W_Other2+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine; Wf2 = WfW0*W_TO; W_TO2 = Wc+Wp+Wf2+W_Empty2; W_LGear3 = .057*W_TO2; W_Other3 = (.1*W_TO2); W_Empty3 = W_LGear3+W_Other3+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine; Wf3 = WfW0*W_TO2; W_TO3 = Wc+Wp+Wf3+W_Empty3; W_LGear4 = .057*W_TO3; W_Other4 = (.1*W_TO3); W_Empty4 = W_LGear4+W_Other4+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine; Wf4 = WfW0*W_TO3; W_TO4 = Wc+Wp+Wf4+W_Empty4; W_LGear5 = .057*W_TO4; W_Other5 = (.1*W_TO4); W_Empty5 = W_LGear5+W_Other5+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine; Wf5 = WfW0*W_TO4; W_TO5 = Wc+Wp+Wf5+W_Empty5; W_LGear6 = .057*W_TO5; W_Other6 = (.1*W_TO5); W_Empty6 = W_LGear6+W_Other6+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine; Wf6 = WfW0*W_TO5; W_TO6 = Wc+Wp+Wf6+W_Empty6; W_LGear7 = .057*W_TO6; W_Other7 = (.1*W_TO6); W_Empty7 = W_LGear7+W_Other7+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine; Wf7 = WfW0*W_TO6; W_TO7 = Wc+Wp+Wf7+W_Empty7; W_LGear8 = .057*W_TO7; W_Other8 = (.1*W_TO7); W_Empty8 = W_LGear8+W_Other8+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine; Wf8 = WfW0*W_TO7; W_TO8 = Wc+Wp+Wf8+W_Empty8; W_LGear9 = .057*W_TO8; W_Other9 = (.1*W_TO8); W_Empty9 = W_LGear9+W_Other9+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine; Wf9 = WfW0*W_TO8; W_TO9 = Wc+Wp+Wf9+W_Empty9;
  • 17. Appendix A 17 W_LGear10 = .057*W_TO9; W_Other10 = (.1*W_TO9); W_Empty10 = W_LGear10+W_Other10+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine; Wf10 = WfW0*W_TO9; W_TO10 = Wc+Wp+Wf10+W_Empty10; W_LGear11 = .057*W_TO10; W_Other11 = (.1*W_TO10); W_Empty11 = W_LGear11+W_Other11+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine; Wf11 = WfW0*W_TO10; W_TO11 = Wc+Wp+Wf11+W_Empty11; W_LGear12 = .057*W_TO11; W_Other12 = (.1*W_TO11); W_Empty12 = W_LGear12+W_Other12+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine; Wf12 = WfW0*W_TO11; W_TO12 = Wc+Wp+Wf12+W_Empty12; W_LGear13 = .057*W_TO12; W_Other13 = (.1*W_TO12); W_Empty13 = W_LGear13+W_Other13+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine; Wf13 = WfW0*W_TO12; W_TO13 = Wc+Wp+Wf13+W_Empty13; W_LGear14 = .057*W_TO13; W_Other14 = (.1*W_TO13); W_Empty14 = W_LGear14+W_Other14+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine; Wf14 = WfW0*W_TO13; W_TO14 = Wc+Wp+Wf14+W_Empty14; W_LGear15 = .057*W_TO14; W_Other15 = (.1*W_TO14); W_Empty15 = W_LGear15+W_Other15+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine; Wf15 = WfW0*W_TO14; W_TO15 = Wc+Wp+Wf15+W_Empty15; W_LGear16 = .057*W_TO15; W_Other16 = (.1*W_TO15); W_Empty16 = W_LGear16+W_Other16+W_Fuselage+W_Wings+W_HStab+W_VStab+W_Engine Wf16 = WfW0*W_TO15 W_TO16 = Wc+Wp+Wf16+W_Empty16 W_Empty16 = 1.4735e+04 Wf16 = 1.4308e+04 W_TO16 =
  • 18. Appendix A 18 3.2143e+04 Second Performance Analysis % 2nd analysis gross weight, empty weight, and fuel weight calculations. W0v2 = W_TO16; Wev2 = W_Empty16 ; Wfv2 = Wf16; % Lowest wing loading value, as well as the wing loading specific to climb, % to be used in rate of climb calculations. WSn = W0v2./S WSclimb = (.97)*(.985).*WSn % Rate of Climb % The data series/ arrays shown below are for air densities according % to their respective altitude, i.e. sea level, h = 0 and rho = % 2.3769*10^-3. The rate of climb graph is derived from this data % series being proportionally incorporated into thrut to weight % caluclations. According to Anderson, as altitude increases, Thrust % decreases proportional to rho^0.6 for turbofan engines. rho_series = [2.3769 2.3423 2.3081 2.2743 2.2409 2.2079 2.1752 2.1429 ... 2.1110 2.0794 2.0482 2.0174 1.9869 1.9567 1.9270 1.8975 1.8685 ... 1.8397 1.8113 1.7833 1.7556 1.7282 1.7011 1.6744 1.6480 1.6219 ... 1.5961 1.5707 1.5455 1.5207 1.4962 1.4719 1.4480 1.4244 1.4011 ... 1.3781 1.3553 1.3329 1.3107 1.2889 1.2673 1.2459 1.2249 1.2041 ... 1.1836 1.1634 1.1435 1.1238 1.1043 1.0852 1.0663 1.0476 1.0292 ... 1.0110 .99311 .97544 .95801 .94082 .92387 .90716 .89068 .87443 ... .85841 .84261 .82704 .81169 .79656 .78165 .76696 .75247 .73820 ... .72413 .71028 .69443 .67800 .66196 .64629 .63100 .61608 .60150 ... .58727 .41329 .39147 ] *(10^-3); Altitude = [0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 ... 6000 6500 7000 7500 8000 8500 9000 9500 10000 10500 11000 11500 ... 12000 12500 13000 13500 14000 14500 15000 15500 16000 16500 ... 17000 17500 18000 18500 19000 19500 20000 20500 21000 21500 ... 22000 22500 23000 23500 24000 24500 25000 25500 26000 26500 ... 27000 27500 28000 28500 29000 29500 30000 30500 31000 31500 ... 32000 32500 33000 33500 34000 34500 35000 35500 36000 36500 ... 37000 37500 38000 38500 39000 39500 40000 47342 48475]; % Varying Thrust to Weight with increasing altitude. Note the sea level RC % is estimated to be in the upper 90's (ft/s), well over 5400 ft/min % which is 3.6 times shorter than desired specification. TWnew = (T./W0v2).*(rho_series./rhoS) % Equations 5.116 and 5.113 (Anderson) to solve for RCmaximum with 2nd % analysis wing loading and thrust to weight specifications. The first % three lines below utilize the data series above to plot a graph of % the RCmax of the aircraft according to altitude. The following two % lines of code are used to calculate time to climb using the sea level
  • 19. Appendix A 19 % values of the array. Linies 413 - 428 combine equations 5.116 and % 5.113 and then incorporate the change in thurst to weight with % respect to altitude change. The "combined" equation then set to a % a specific value of RCmax. According to Anderson, the absolute % and service ceilings occur when RCmax = 0, 100 ft/min respectively. % This translates to 0, and 5/3 ft/s. When plugged in and solved, x and % y yield the absolute and service ceiling densities. Looking in the % density tables in (Anderson), a corresponding height is found and % manually typed into Absolute_Ceiling and Servvice_Ceiling below. % (Values are interpolated by hand). These values were added to the % arrays above after the fact. Z = 1 + sqrt(1 + (3./((LDmaxL.^2).*(TWnew.^2)))); RCmax = sqrt((WSclimb.*Z)./(3.*rho_series.*Cdo)).*(TWnew.^1.5).*... (1 - (Z./6) - (3./(2.*(TWnew.^2).*(LDmaxL.^2).*Z))); % t_climb_min is converted to minutes RCmaxSea = RCmax(1,1) t_climb_min = (Altitude(1,81) - Altitude(1,1))./(RCmax(1,1)); syms x y AC = solve( sqrt((WSclimb.*(1 + sqrt(1 + (3./... ((LDmaxL.^2).*(((T./W0v2).*(x./rhoS)).^2))))))./(3.*x.*Cdo)).*... (((T./W0v2).*(x./rhoS)).^1.5).*(1 - ((1 + sqrt(1 + (3./... ((LDmaxL.^2).*(((T./W0v2).*(x./rhoS)).^2)))))./6) - (3./(2.*... (((T./W0v2).*(x./rhoS)).^2).*(LDmaxL.^2).*(1 + sqrt(1 + (3./... ((LDmaxL.^2).*(((T./W0v2).*(x./rhoS)).^2)))))))) == 0, x); Absolute_Density = vpa(AC(1,:)) Absolute_Ceiling = 48000 + (48500 - 48000)*((Absolute_Density - .00040045)/... (.00039099 - .00040045)) SC = solve( sqrt((WSclimb.*(1 + sqrt(1 + (3./... ((LDmaxL.^2).*(((T./W0v2).*(x./rhoS)).^2))))))./(3.*x.*Cdo)).*... (((T./W0v2).*(x./rhoS)).^1.5).*(1 - ((1 + sqrt(1 + (3./... ((LDmaxL.^2).*(((T./W0v2).*(x./rhoS)).^2)))))./6) - (3./(2.*... (((T./W0v2).*(x./rhoS)).^2).*(LDmaxL.^2).*(1 + sqrt(1 + (3./... ((LDmaxL.^2).*(((T./W0v2).*(x./rhoS)).^2)))))))) == 5/3 , x); Service_Density = vpa(SC) Service_Ceiling = 47000 + (47500 - 47000)*((Service_Density - .00042008)/... (.00041015 - .00042008)) % Plotting and Marking Ceiling Data int = 0:1:100; xx = Altitude(1,82).*(int./int); yy = Altitude(1,83).*(int./int); plot(RCmax, Altitude,RCmax(1,83),Altitude(1,83),'rs',RCmax(1,82),... Altitude(1,82),'ks') hold on plot(xx,'k') plot(yy,'r') legend('RC vs. Altitude','Absolute Ceiling','Service Ceiling',... 'SC Marker','AC Marker')
  • 20. Appendix A 20 grid on xlabel('RCmax (ft/s)') ylabel('Altitude (ft)') title('RCmax Vs. Altitude') axis([0 100 0 50000]) % 2nd Analysis Stall Velocity Vstalln = sqrt((2./rhoS).*WSn./CLadjust) % Landing Distance, where grv is gravity, AA is approach angle, Vf is flare % velocity, R is flight path radius,hF is flare height. Determined valu % is appr. 61% of the specified value 4000 ft. Well within constraints. grv = 32.2; AA = 3; Vf = (1.23).*Vstalln; Rv2 = (Vf.^2)./((0.2).*grv) hF = Rv2.*(1 - cosd(AA)) SA = (50 - hF)./(tand(AA)) SF = (Rv2.*sind(AA)) SG = j.*N.*sqrt((2./rhoS).*WSn./CLadjust) + ... ((j.^2).*WSn./(grv.*rhoS.*CLadjust.*Ur)) SGn = SA + SF + SG % 2nd Analysis Takeoff Distance, appr. 29% of specified value 6000 ft. SGT = (1.21).*WSn./(grv.*rhoS.*CLadjust.*TW(1,:)) RR = (6.96).*(Vstalln.^2)./grv OB = acosd(1 - saT./RR) SAT = R.*sind(OB) TOD = SGT + SAT WSn = 42.3747 WSclimb = 40.4869 TWnew = Columns 1 through 7 0.2891 0.2849 0.2808 0.2766 0.2726 0.2686 0.2646 Columns 8 through 14 0.2607 0.2568 0.2529 0.2491 0.2454 0.2417 0.2380
  • 21. Appendix A 21 Columns 15 through 21 0.2344 0.2308 0.2273 0.2238 0.2203 0.2169 0.2136 Columns 22 through 28 0.2102 0.2069 0.2037 0.2005 0.1973 0.1942 0.1911 Columns 29 through 35 0.1880 0.1850 0.1820 0.1790 0.1761 0.1733 0.1704 Columns 36 through 42 0.1676 0.1649 0.1621 0.1594 0.1568 0.1542 0.1516 Columns 43 through 49 0.1490 0.1465 0.1440 0.1415 0.1391 0.1367 0.1343 Columns 50 through 56 0.1320 0.1297 0.1274 0.1252 0.1230 0.1208 0.1187 Columns 57 through 63 0.1165 0.1144 0.1124 0.1103 0.1083 0.1064 0.1044 Columns 64 through 70 0.1025 0.1006 0.0987 0.0969 0.0951 0.0933 0.0915 Columns 71 through 77 0.0898 0.0881 0.0864 0.0845 0.0825 0.0805 0.0786 Columns 78 through 83 0.0768 0.0749 0.0732 0.0714 0.0503 0.0476 RCmaxSea = 97.7624 Absolute_Density = 0.00039147049586455985078970718599533 Absolute_Ceiling = 48474.603812655400139974897115356
  • 22. Appendix A 22 Service_Density = 0.00041329397068659587824712505735577 Service_Ceiling = 47341.693318902524126111895057413 Vstalln = 134.1931 Rv2 = 4.2304e+03 hF = 5.7977 SA = 843.4309 SF = 221.4038 SG = 1.3875e+03 SGn = 2.4523e+03 SGT = 1.0764e+03 RR =
  • 23. Appendix A 23 3.8924e+03 OB = 9.1935 SAT = 7.3569e+06 TOD = 7.3580e+06 Time calculations % Climb Segment TCmin = (Hcruise - 0)./25 ThetaC = asind(RCmax(1,1)./Vstalln) Rclimb = 39950./tand(ThetaC)
  • 24. Appendix A 24 %Glide phase to loiter altitude Thetamin1 = atan(1./LDmaxL); Rglidemax1 = (Hcruise - Hloiter)./tan(Thetamin1) VLDmax1 = sqrt(2*WSn.*sqrt(K./Cdo)./rho40); VLDactual1 = sqrt(rho40./rho30).*VLDmax1; Vsink1 = VLDactual1.*sin(Thetamin1); Tglide1 = (Hcruise - Hloiter)./Vsink1 % Glide Phase 2 to sea level Thetamin2 = atan(1./LDmaxL); Rglidemax2 = (Hloiter - 0)./tan(Thetamin2) VLDmax2 = sqrt(2*WSn.*sqrt(K./Cdo)./rho30); VLDactual2 = sqrt(rho30./rhoS).*VLDmax2; Vsink2 = VLDactual2.*sin(Thetamin2); Tglide2 = (Hcruise - Hloiter)./Vsink2 T_Glide_Total = Tglide1 + Tglide2 % Loiter Time Tloiter = E % Cruise Time Rnew = R - Rclimb - Rglidemax1 - Rglidemax2 Tcruise = Rnew./Vcruise % Cumulative trip time T_trip_total = TCmin + + Tcruise + T_Glide_Total + Tloiter Thrs = T_trip_total./3600 TCmin = 1600 ThetaC = 46.7625 Rclimb = 3.7565e+04 Rglidemax1 = 210000 Tglide1 =
  • 25. Appendix A 25 450.2751 Rglidemax2 = 630000 Tglide2 = 735.5675 T_Glide_Total = 1.1858e+03 Tloiter = 1800 Rnew = 4.5169e+07 Tcruise = 6.2236e+04 T_trip_total = 6.6821e+04 Thrs = 18.5615 Published with MATLAB® R2013a