Presentation at the Pakistan Afghanistan Federation Forum, U.S. Pentagon, June 6, 2014, by Gary Langer, Langer Research Associates, and Matthew Warshaw, D3 Systems/ACSOR, on D3's Afghan Futures public opinion polling on the Afghan presidential election.
Exploring protein-protein interactions by Weak Affinity Chromatography (WAC) ...
Afghan Election Fed Forum-June 6 2014
1. Presented at the Afghanistan Pakistan Federation Forum
June 6, 2014
Gary Langer – Langer Research Associates
Matt Warshaw - D3 Systems/ACSOR-Surveys
2. Gary Langer, founder and president of Langer Research Associates, is an
internationally recognized public opinion researcher with nearly three
decades in the field. A former longtime director of polling at ABC News,
Langer continues to direct the ongoing ABC News/Washington Post poll for
ABC, as well as leading survey research projects for government, NGO,
foundation, corporate and other media clients. The firm specializes in
public policy, politics, consumer attitudes, international development and
health care, among other topics.
A two-time Emmy award winner, Langer’s analyses of a six-year series of
national news-sponsored surveys in Afghanistan and Iraq were recognized
with the Policy Impact Award of the American Association for Public Opinion
Research. He’s a board member of the nonprofit Roper Center for Public
Opinion Research, a trustee of the National Council on Public Polls and
former president of the New York Chapter of the American Association for
Public Opinion Research.
3. Matthew Warshaw is the Vice President of D3 Systems, Inc., and
managing director of ACSOR-Surveys, founded by D3 in 2003 to create
Afghan opinion and market research capacity (www.acsor-surveys.com ).
Mr. Warshaw has extensive experience establishing research operations
in conflict and post-conflict environments and developing countries
including Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Haiti, Iraq,
Kosovo, Nigeria, Pakistan, Yemen and Iran. He has worked on polling for
programs such as the Emmy award-winning ABC News series “Where
Things Stand” in Afghanistan and Iraq.
He also manages projects in more stable markets in Africa, Asia, Europe,
the Gulf States, the former Soviet Union and Latin America. He joined the
board of Infinite Insight, D3’s partner in Africa, in August 2011.
4. Data for this presentation come from the Afghan
Futures research series, conceived as a public service
to document the attitudes of Afghan citizens and
independently conducted since 2010 by ACSOR-
Surveys and D3 Systems.
The project to date has produced five nationally
representative studies. Details: www.acsor-
surveys.com or www.d3systems.com
5. F2F sample in all 34 Afghan provinces
Area probability w/ urban/rural stratification;
random walk from 540 starting points
Within-household selection via Kish grid
Interviews in Dari and Pashto
Weighting to urban/rural status by province
and gender by region per 2011 CSO projections
Field work and DP by ACSOR-Surveys
Analysis and questionnaire design by Langer
Research Associates
6. Field work: March 10-18, 2014
Election Day was April 5
N=2,643, RR 81%
MOE +/-2.5 for GP, +/-4 for LVs, inc. DEFF
7. Quality control measures included supervisor and
telephone back-checks on 18%, double-entry on
10%, and logic and patterning controls.
• Interviews conducted
by ACSOR-trained,
locally based
professional
interviewers
• In compliance with
cultural norms, all
interviews were
gender-matched.
8. • One in 10 men, 26
percent of women live
in areas inaccessible
due to security
conditions.
• Inaccessible districts
were randomly
replaced within the
same province.
9.
10.
11.
12. 76% reported being registered to vote
13% “very likely” to register
75% said they would vote; 50% “definitely”
23. Abdullah Ghani Other cands.
Tajik 53% 24% 33%
Pashtun 14% 43% 48%
Hazara 21% 11% 13%
Uzbek 6% 15% 1%
Other ethnicity 6% 6% 5%
North 40% 31% 21%
Central/Kabul 30% 20% 24%
West 10% 9% 9%
Hazarjat 9% 5% 8%
South Central 7% 16% 8%
East 4% 13% 14%
Southwest 1% 6% 16%
Support Profile
Note: Low Ns, “other” ethnicity and Southwest
24. All resps. RVs LVs
Pashtun 40% 37% 31%
Tajik 34% 34% 39%
Hazara 11% 12% 16%
Uzbek 9% 9% 8%
Other ethnicity 7% 7% 6%
North 29% 31% 33%
Central/Kabul 20% 19% 26%
West 11% 11% 9%
South Central 14% 13% 10%
East 10% 10% 9%
Southwest 9% 8% 6%
Hazarjat 7% 7% 7%
Prevalence of Groups
25. 44.9%
31.5%
11.5%
7.1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Abdullah Ghani Rasul Sayaf
Final Election Results
April 2014
Source: Independent Election Commission of Afghanistan
http://www.iec.org.af/media-section/press-releases/357-preliminary
Our estimate was 46-35%
Appx. 6.6m votes cast (vs. 4.6m in 2009)
Abdullah and Ghani go to runoff, June 14
26. 47% 48% 48%
51% 50% 52% 53%52% 51% 51% 49% 49%
47% 46%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1
(69%
of adults)
2
(57%)
3
(50%)
4
(48%)
5
(45%)
6
(35%)
7
(29%)
Abdullah Ghani
Support by Likely Voter Model, Runoff
Among likely voters, March 2014
Higher turnout Lower turnout
Average of the three
middle models: 50-50
30. First round Runoff Diff.
Tajik 21% 31% +10
Pashtun 49% 75% +26
Hazara 24% 31% +7
Uzbek 64% 60% -4
Other ethnicity 39% 52% +13
North 33% 41% +8
Central/Kabul 28% 38% +10
South Central 55% 67% +12
East 51% 83% +32
West 32% 42% +10
Hazarjat 23% 37% +14
Southwest 35% 78% +43
31. First round Runoff Diff.
Tajik 62% 67% +5
Pashtun 21% 24% +3
Hazara 61% 68% +7
Uzbek 33% 39% +6
Other ethnicity 46% 47% +1
North 55% 58% +3
Central/Kabul 54% 60% +6
South Central 30% 33% +3
East 19% 17% -2
West 49% 54% +5
Hazarjat 55% 62% +7
Southwest 10% 22% +12
32. Abdullah Ghani
Tajik 52% 25%
Pashtun 15% 48%
Hazara 21% 10%
Uzbek 6% 10%
Other ethnicity 5% 6%
North 39% 29%
Central/Kabul 31% 20%
South Central 7% 14%
East 3% 15%
West 10% 8%
Hazarjat 9% 6%
Southwest 2% 9%
33. Variable Beta
Hazara .20***
Tajik .19***
East -.11**
South Central -.11**
Importance of candidate’s views on
dealing with the Taliban
-.10**
Importance of candidate’s empathy -.08*
Rate living conditions positively .07**
Rural .07*
*** < .001, ** < .01, * < .05; R2=.21
34. Affinity-group voting is hardly unusual, and while
ethnic or tribal predispositions are a key factor in
Afghans’ vote preferences, they’re not exclusive.
Note: Ghani wins support from three in 10 Tajiks
while Abdullah is backed by a quarter of Pashtuns.
Candidates’ options: consolidate within their
ethnic support groups; build out to gain greater
cross-ethnic support; or - perhaps best – seek a
middle path that accomplishes both.
We find room for ethnic/tribal accommodation.
36. 76%
71%
67%
45%
38% 37%
33% 31% 29% 27%
23%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100% Would Vote For or Accept as Legitimate
Among general population, March 2014
38. Presented at the Afghanistan Pakistan Federation Forum
June 6, 2014
Gary Langer – Langer Research Associates
Matt Warshaw - D3 Systems/ACSOR-Surveys
Thank you!
Editor's Notes
Langer Research Associates has partnered with ACSOR Surveys on more than a dozen public opinion surveys in Afghanistan for media and NGO clients since 2005. Gary Langer has directed election polling for ABC News in every U.S. national election since 1990.
ACSOR has provided surveys for a broad variety of clients including ABC News, BBC News, and The Asia Foundation
Regional differences: Concerns are lowest in the North and Hazarjat, 54 and 52 percent; highest in the West, 81 percent, and in the East and South Central, 68-69 percent.
Expectation of fairness is lowest among Tajiks, 47%, vs. about six in 10 among Pashtuns, Hazaras and Uzbeks alike.
As noted, security concerns are lowest in the North and Hazarjat, 54 and 52 percent; highest in the West, 81 percent, and in the East and South Central, 68-69 percent.
Expectation of fairness is lowest among Tajiks, 47%, vs. about six in 10 among Pashtuns, Hazaras and Uzbeks alike.
Need legend
Peaks among Tajiks (85%), also in Kabul (87%). Lowest in the South and East (60s).
Note: Small N of LVs in Southwest, 67. Others are 100+.
Note, small N of LVs for “other” ethnicity, 60.
Note: Small N of LVs in Southwest, 67. Others are 100+. Small N for “other” ethnicity, 60.
Pashtun plurality among all resps. goes to Tajik plurality among likely voters.
North + Central/Kabul go from 49% to 59%.
Note: Small N of LVs in Southwest, 67. Others are 100+. Small N for “other” ethnicity, 60.
This is 19% of all LVs.
Note: Small N of LVs in Southwest, 67. Others are 100+.
Ghani goes from 49% of Pashtuns in 1st round to 75% of Pashtuns in runoff. (See next slide.)
Note, small N for “other” ethnicity, 60.
Note: Small N in Southwest, 67. Others are 100+. Small N for “other” ethnicity, 60.
Note: Small N in Southwest, 67. Others are 100+. Small N for “other” ethnicity, 60.
Note: Small N in Southwest, 67. Others are 100+. Small N for “other” ethnicity, 60.
Predicts Abdullah. Refs are West for region and Other for ethnicity.
Pashtun and Uzbek are marginally sig for Ghani, with Betas of -.11 and -.08, respectively.
Note: Removing region, R2s are .18 to .20, and ethnicity is sig at <.001 in 15 of 20 cases (with varying referents). In largest betas, with Pashtun as referent, Tajik is sig. at .37, Hazara at .27; with Tajik as referent, Pashtun is sig at -39; with Hazara as referent, Pashtun is sig a -.38.
Independent variables: Views of the country’s direction; ratings of living conditions; urban/rural status; gender; age; region; ethnicity; ratings of the importance of the candidates’ views on economic development, negotiation with the Taliban, corruption, relations with the U.S. and relations with Pakistan; importance of the candidates’ integrity, experience, leadership, education and empathy; and ratings of the condition of the economy.
NUMBERS = Vote for candidate first choice + second choice + if it was not their candidate for either would find him acceptable.