The document discusses broadband over power lines (BPL) as a potential solution to providing broadband internet access to rural areas. It explains that BPL works by transmitting voice and internet data signals over existing power lines using a technology similar to digital subscriber line (DSL) that sends higher frequency signals carrying data alongside the lower frequency alternating current. The document also discusses regulatory issues around whether BPL would be classified as a telecommunications or information service and debates around how internet service providers should be regulated, particularly regarding net neutrality.
Big Broadband: Public Infrastructure or Private MonopoliesWayne Caswell
This paper contrasts the different incentives of incumbent ISPs, municipalities and other stakeholders, suggesting that the cost of extending fiber closer to premises is high enough to cause IPSs to cherry pick the most profitable customers, leaving others to fend for themselves. That’s where public broadband comes in, but the politics can pose obstacles for municipalities that want their own networks, so this paper also includes a section explaining the fears of various stakeholders. Incumbent phone companies, for example, fear competition from VoIP alternatives and are using their deep pockets and powerful lobbyists to delay competition as long as they can.
Big Broadband: Public Infrastructure or Private MonopoliesWayne Caswell
This paper contrasts the different incentives of incumbent ISPs, municipalities and other stakeholders, suggesting that the cost of extending fiber closer to premises is high enough to cause IPSs to cherry pick the most profitable customers, leaving others to fend for themselves. That’s where public broadband comes in, but the politics can pose obstacles for municipalities that want their own networks, so this paper also includes a section explaining the fears of various stakeholders. Incumbent phone companies, for example, fear competition from VoIP alternatives and are using their deep pockets and powerful lobbyists to delay competition as long as they can.
An internet with lower case “i” is two or more networks that can communicate with each other. The most notable internet is called the Internet with upper case “I” is composed of thousands of interconnected networks The Internet as several backbones, provider networks, and customer networks. At the top level, the backbones (international ISPs) are large networks owned by some communication companies such as Sprint, Verizon (MCI), AT&T, and NTT. The backbone networks are connected through some complex switching systems, called peering points. At the second level, there are smaller networks, called provider networks that uses the services of the backbones and pay them for their services. The provider networks are connected to backbones or other provider networks. At the edge of the Internet the customer networks are networks that actually use the services provided by the Internet. They pay to provider networks for receiving services. Backbones and provider networks are also called Internet Service Providers (ISPs). The backbones are known as international ISPs and the provider networks are known as national or regional lSPs.
UNDERSTANDING THE DEBATE OVER GOVERNMENT-OWNED BROADBAND NETWORKSEd Dodds
Context, Lessons Learned, and a Way Forward for Policy Makers Cedar Falls Case Study Charles M. Davidson Director, ACLP at New York Law School Michael J. Santorelli Director, ACLP at New York Law School From JUNE 2014
Overview of what an IP transition is: the replacement of traditional public switched telephone network with a network based around the IP protocol — a packet-switched v. a circuit switched network. The purpose of the switch is to bring potentially more efficiency and purpose to the network via wireless or wireline — or a combination of both — networks.
Global Trends in Broadband: Learn about the emergence of big bandwidth networks and applications from around the world. Hear about what is happening in Minnesota and in the U.S with fiber optic networks! Understand how advanced wireless networks are changing our world and the way we communicate.
Rethinking Investments in Rural Infrastructure and Access in a Changing World ruralxchange
A webinar from NARP
Speakers:
Edyael Casaperalta (Center for Rural Strategies), Jason Whittet (Massachusetts Broadband Institute), Darlene R. Wong and John Van Alst (National Consumer Law Center)
This webinar will focus primarily on the need, funding and investment for telecommunications, including broadband infrastructure. Public advocates will identify issues underlying the need for telecommunications infrastructure to rural areas, and associated challenges to funding. Associated challenges include FCC policies and directives and will include a review of FCC's plans for extending broadband to rural areas. It will examine and critique the current dynamic of public funding that is allocated to telecommunications companies, rather than to smaller entities and community anchor institutions. It will also touch on the depletion of private Foundation resources, and describe the different ways that public investment in broadband infrastructure can be funded.
The U.S. telecom industry has undergone a number of significant changes over the past few years.
In this presentation that Dr. Jim Anderson created for MBA students, he explains where the industry has been and where it is going.
Dr. Anderson takes the time to explain the changes that have occurred in the industry in terms of the classes that MBA students have already had. He brings home how the changes have dramatically reshaped the telecom industry.
For more information on Dr. Jim Anderson and his company, Blue Elephant Consulting, find out more on the web at http://www.BlueElephantConsulting.com
Presentation by Dwight Allison, CEO of Maine Fiber Company, Fletcher Kittredge, CEO of GWI, and Susan Corbett, CEO of Axiom technologies on uses and adoption of broadband in Maine. Presented in December, 2011
Self Prepared material when i didn't find one. It covers basics of communication network evolution and also covers the Key factors in communication network evolution.
An internet with lower case “i” is two or more networks that can communicate with each other. The most notable internet is called the Internet with upper case “I” is composed of thousands of interconnected networks The Internet as several backbones, provider networks, and customer networks. At the top level, the backbones (international ISPs) are large networks owned by some communication companies such as Sprint, Verizon (MCI), AT&T, and NTT. The backbone networks are connected through some complex switching systems, called peering points. At the second level, there are smaller networks, called provider networks that uses the services of the backbones and pay them for their services. The provider networks are connected to backbones or other provider networks. At the edge of the Internet the customer networks are networks that actually use the services provided by the Internet. They pay to provider networks for receiving services. Backbones and provider networks are also called Internet Service Providers (ISPs). The backbones are known as international ISPs and the provider networks are known as national or regional lSPs.
UNDERSTANDING THE DEBATE OVER GOVERNMENT-OWNED BROADBAND NETWORKSEd Dodds
Context, Lessons Learned, and a Way Forward for Policy Makers Cedar Falls Case Study Charles M. Davidson Director, ACLP at New York Law School Michael J. Santorelli Director, ACLP at New York Law School From JUNE 2014
Overview of what an IP transition is: the replacement of traditional public switched telephone network with a network based around the IP protocol — a packet-switched v. a circuit switched network. The purpose of the switch is to bring potentially more efficiency and purpose to the network via wireless or wireline — or a combination of both — networks.
Global Trends in Broadband: Learn about the emergence of big bandwidth networks and applications from around the world. Hear about what is happening in Minnesota and in the U.S with fiber optic networks! Understand how advanced wireless networks are changing our world and the way we communicate.
Rethinking Investments in Rural Infrastructure and Access in a Changing World ruralxchange
A webinar from NARP
Speakers:
Edyael Casaperalta (Center for Rural Strategies), Jason Whittet (Massachusetts Broadband Institute), Darlene R. Wong and John Van Alst (National Consumer Law Center)
This webinar will focus primarily on the need, funding and investment for telecommunications, including broadband infrastructure. Public advocates will identify issues underlying the need for telecommunications infrastructure to rural areas, and associated challenges to funding. Associated challenges include FCC policies and directives and will include a review of FCC's plans for extending broadband to rural areas. It will examine and critique the current dynamic of public funding that is allocated to telecommunications companies, rather than to smaller entities and community anchor institutions. It will also touch on the depletion of private Foundation resources, and describe the different ways that public investment in broadband infrastructure can be funded.
The U.S. telecom industry has undergone a number of significant changes over the past few years.
In this presentation that Dr. Jim Anderson created for MBA students, he explains where the industry has been and where it is going.
Dr. Anderson takes the time to explain the changes that have occurred in the industry in terms of the classes that MBA students have already had. He brings home how the changes have dramatically reshaped the telecom industry.
For more information on Dr. Jim Anderson and his company, Blue Elephant Consulting, find out more on the web at http://www.BlueElephantConsulting.com
Presentation by Dwight Allison, CEO of Maine Fiber Company, Fletcher Kittredge, CEO of GWI, and Susan Corbett, CEO of Axiom technologies on uses and adoption of broadband in Maine. Presented in December, 2011
Self Prepared material when i didn't find one. It covers basics of communication network evolution and also covers the Key factors in communication network evolution.
Given the central role of telecommunications in the global economy and in the lives of humans worldwide, an understanding of innovation in telecommunications is critical to understanding the global dynamics of innovation generally. The technical, economic, and political dynamism of the sector means that there could be no better time for this work.
Broadband refers to various high-capacity transmission technologies that transmit data, voice, and video across long distances and at high speeds. Common mediums of transmission include coaxial cables, fiber optic cables, and radio waves.
Broadband is always connected and removes the need for dial-up. Its importance is far-reaching; it allows for high-quality and quick access to information, teleconferencing, data transmission, and more in various capacities, including healthcare, education, and technological development.
Today, the discussion of broadband often centers on high-speed Internet access. Historically, broadband Internet was defined as being faster than a traditional dial-up Internet connection. However, it is now common for more precise definitions to be required.In general, however, the two defining characteristics of broadband are that it is high-speed and that it is available at all times. Both of these characteristics serve to distinguish broadband from older dial-up connections. Not only was dial-up Internet connection slower, but it was only available when specifically requested by the user. Global usage and speeds
Because of its clear advantages over dial-up services, broadband Internet access is preferred by both end users and governments.
The use of broadband has been increasing. According to data from the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the United Nations specialized agency for information and communication technologies (ICTs), the estimated number of people using the Internet hit 4.9 billion in 2021, up from an estimated 4.1 billion in 2019.
Broadband speeds are also improving. By 2023, the global average broadband speed is expected to be 110.4 Mbps, more than double the average speed of 45.9 Mbps registered in 2018. Mobile speeds, meanwhile, are predicted to average 43.9 Mbps in 2023, up from 13.2 Mbps in 2018.
Managerial Economics and Business Strategy, 8e Page 1
Case Summary 3
Justice Department Seeks to Enjoin Merger between WorldCom
and Sprint Corporation
Michael Baye and Patrick Scholten prepared this case to serve as the basis for classroom discussion rather
than to present economic or legal fact. The case is a condensed and slightly modified version of the public
copy of the U.S. Justice Department’s civil action on June 26, 2000 to enjoin WorldCom, Inc. from acquiring
Sprint Corporation.
Overview of The Telecommunication Industry
For most of the twentieth century, the provision of long distance telecommunications
services and many other telecommunications services in the United States was
monopolized by AT&T. In the 1970s, this monopoly was challenged by new entrants,
supported by changes in Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations designed
to promote competition and by the government’s antitrust case challenging AT&T’s actions
to preserve its monopoly. These efforts ultimately succeeded in bringing competition to
long distance services.
In the 1980s and 1990s, two companies -- and only two companies -- emerged as major
competitors to AT&T, and to each other. MCI (which merged with WorldCom in 1998) and
Sprint each constructed national and international fiber optic networks, developed
sophisticated systems for handling many millions of customer accounts, hired and trained
large workforces capable of providing a wide range of high-quality telecommunications
services to customers throughout the nation, and invested billions of dollars over many
years to establish widely known and trusted brands.
Many other carriers have entered on a much smaller scale, but none has produced
beneficial effects on competition comparable in magnitude to the effects produced by
competition between WorldCom and Sprint, and between those companies and AT&T.
Those two companies, together with AT&T, dominate the provision of long distance services
to residential and small/home office consumers, the provision of international services
between the United States and many countries throughout the world for customers in the
United States, and the provision of key data network services and custom network services
used by many large business customers. In addition, WorldCom has attained (primarily
through a series of acquisitions) a commanding position in the ownership and operation of
the “backbone” networks that connect the thousands of smaller networks that constitute
the Internet, and Sprint is WorldCom’s largest competitor in that market.
Managerial Economics and Business Strategy, 8e Page 2
In particular, WorldCom and Sprint are:
1. the largest and second-largest of a small group of top-tier providers of Internet
“backbone” network services in the United States and the world;
2. the second- and third-largest of three providers who collectively dominate long
distance telecommunications within the Unit ...
An Internet service provider (ISP) is an organisation that provides services for accessing, using, or participating in the Internet. Internet service providers can be organised in various forms, such as commercial, community-owned, non-profit, or otherwise privately owned.
THIS IS AN ARTICLE PLEASE GIVE ANSWERS FOR THE QUESTIONS (THE PROBLE.pdfinfo824691
THIS IS AN ARTICLE PLEASE GIVE ANSWERS FOR THE QUESTIONS (THE
PROBLEM)
Closing Case Network Neutrality Wars
The explosive growth of streaming video and mobile technologies is creating bandwidth
problems over the Internet. The Internet was designed to transmit content such as e-mails and
Web pages. However, media items being transmitted across the Internet today, such as high-
definition movies, are vastly larger in size. To compound this problem, there are (in early 2015)
over 180 million smartphone users in the United States, many of whom use the Internet to stream
video content to their phones. The Internet bandwidth issue is as much about economics as it is
about technology. Currently, consumers can send 1-kilobyte e-mails or watch the latest 30-
gigabyte movie on their large-screen televisions for the same monthly broadband fee. Unlike the
system used for power and water bills where higher usage results in higher fees, monthly
broadband fees are not tied to consumer usage. A study from Juniper Networks
(www.juniper.net) highlights this “revenue-per-bit” problem. The report predicts that Internet
revenue for carriers such as AT&T (www.att.com) and Comcast (www.comcast.com) will grow
by 5 percent per year through 2020. At the same time, Internet traffic will increase by 27 percent
annually, meaning that carriers will have to increase their bandwidth investment by 20 percent
per year just to keep up with demand. Under this model, the carrier’s business models will face
pressures, because their total necessary investment will exceed revenue growth. Few industry
analysts expect carriers to stop investing in new capacity. Nevertheless, analysts agree that a
financial crunch is coming. As Internet traffic soars, analysts expect revenue per megabit to
decrease. These figures translate into a far lower return on investment (ROI). Although carriers
can find ways to increase their capacity, it will be difficult for them to reap any revenue benefits
from doing so. The heart of the problem is that, even if the technology is equal to the task of
transmitting huge amounts of data, no one is sure how to pay for these technologies. One
proposed solution is to eliminate network neutrality. (A POSSIBLE SOLUTION)Network
neutrality is an operating model under which Internet service providers (ISPs) must allow
customers equal access to content and applications, regardless of the source or nature of the
content. That is, Internet backbone carriers must treat all Web traffic equally, not charging
different rates by user, content, site, platform, or application. Telecommunications and cable
companies want to replace network neutrality with an arrangement in which they can charge
differentiated prices based on the amount of bandwidth consumed by the content that is being
delivered over the Internet. These companies believe that differentiated pricing is the most
equitable method by which they can finance the necessary investments in their network
infrastructures. .
C5-1 CASE STUDY 5NET NEUTRALITYFew issues related to.docxRAHUL126667
C5-1
CASE STUDY 5
NET NEUTRALITY
Few issues related to business use of the Internet have spurred as much
heated debate as Net Neutrality. At the heart of the Net Neutrality debate is
the idea that Internet access providers should not discriminate with regard
to what applications an individual can use or interact with over the Internet.
Advocates of Net Neutrality contend that individual freedom to use of the
Internet extends to the content uploads or downloads. They also believe that
individuals acquiring services from Internet access providers should be able
to use the applications and devices of their choice, and be allowed to interact
with the content of their choice anywhere on the Internet.
The concept of Net Neutrality is grounded in traditional “common
carriage” concepts. Because carriers of goods, people, and information can
be considered common carriers, common carriage concepts have been
applied to trains, planes, buses, and telephone companies. Common carriage
principles embody the ideal that the efficient movement of goods and
information is essential to our economy, nation, and culture, and therefore
carriers must not discriminate against or favor particular individuals or
content.
If common carriers are truly public goods, it can be argued that these
modes of conveyance should not discriminate with regard to what they carry
or where they carry it. This also means that the carrier should not be held
liable for carrying things that may be harmful. For example, if a terrorist
C5-2
uses a subway to travel to the site of a terrorist act, the subway cannot be
sued for being complicit in terrorism.
Telecommunication carriers have been classified as common carriers for
more than 100 years, dating back to the early days of the telegraph. Nearly
half a century has passed since the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) determined that the telephone network should be an open platform
over which computer networks can be created. As a result of the
Carterphone case, the FCC resolved that individuals had the right to attach
devices of their choosing to the telephone network [BOSW12]. This opened
the door for data communication devices such as fax machines and modems
to be attached to telephone lines, thereby making it possible to create
computer networks over the telephone network. In essence, court and
regulatory rulings in the U.S. created an environment that fostered the idea
that computer networks could be constructed to go anywhere the telephone
network could take them using devices that could carry just about any type
of content. The decisions made by courts and regulatory agencies that
opened the door for telephone networks to carry data generated by
computers were largely consistent with traditional common carriage
concepts. However, the emergence of the World Wide Web and the
increased popularity of broadband access that it generated added a ...
Similar to A smart idea for electricity companies (20)