This document summarizes a presentation given by Dr. Mark Leiser on international law and fake news. The presentation covered:
1) Defining fake news and analyzing methods used to spread misinformation.
2) The role of human rights law and principles in regulating fake news while protecting free expression.
3) Future concerns around regulating political advertising, demonetizing fake news sites, and balancing free speech with restricting the sharing of misinformation. The presentation argued for a principled, human-empowering approach to regulation.
Presentation by Federica Casarosa at the 2019 CMPF Summer School for Journalists and Media Practitioners - Covering Political Campaigns in the Age of Data, Algorithms & Artificial Intelligence
Journalism in jordan: Developments in press freedom since the Arab SpringMatt J. Duffy
Research shows four major incidents in Jordan that led to worse press freedom rankings. They are criminal defamation charges, unfair protection of public figures, licensing of journalists and vague terrorism laws.
Presentation by Federica Casarosa at the 2019 CMPF Summer School for Journalists and Media Practitioners - Covering Political Campaigns in the Age of Data, Algorithms & Artificial Intelligence
Journalism in jordan: Developments in press freedom since the Arab SpringMatt J. Duffy
Research shows four major incidents in Jordan that led to worse press freedom rankings. They are criminal defamation charges, unfair protection of public figures, licensing of journalists and vague terrorism laws.
Its not easy being a journalist. Especially in my home country, Kenya. There are constant challenges around the profession, which highlights the effects of press freedom around the world.
Presentation by Bernd Holznagel at the 2019 CMPF Summer School for Journalists and Media Practitioners - Covering Political Campaigns in the Age of Data, Algorithms & Artificial Intelligence
Presentation by Anna Herold at the 2019 CMPF Summer School for Journalists and Media Practitioners - Covering Political Campaigns in the Age of Data, Algorithms & Artificial Intelligence
Presentation by Damian Tambini at the 2019 CMPF Summer School for Journalists and Media Practitioners - Covering Political Campaigns in the Age of Data, Algorithms & Artificial Intelligence
Freedom of the press is not the same as freedom of expressionMartin Hirst
This lecture discusses the concepts of freedom of expression, freedom of speech and freedom of the press. I argue they are not the same thing. I also talk about freedom of speech and freedom of the press under capitalism and conditions of class struggle. I am a Marxist, after all.
Overview of our GNI report, downloadable from http://globalnetworkinitiative.org/news/new-report-outlines-recommendations-governments-companies-and-others-how-protect-free
This paper identifies and analyzes the defamation provisions in the laws of six Arab countries and compares them to generally accepted approaches toward libel and slander. The authors identify three main characteristics related to defamation law that are generally adopted by countries with strong protections for press freedom. First, public figures must withstand greater scrutiny than private figures so that powerful officials cannot use defamation charges to stifle public debate. Second, truth must be an absolute defense against allegations of defamation so that people cannot protect a good reputation that they do not deserve. Third, defamation cases should be handled by civil lawsuits rather than police complaints so that journalists are not unduly swayed in their reporting by the specter of ending up in prison. The analysis examines the penal codes, media laws and cybercrime laws of these six countries: Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, and the United Arab Emirates. The results find that the defamation provisions in these countries were nearly identical and that all were out of alignment with generally accepted norms. Public officials receive more protection than private figures, truth is not an absolute defense and all defamation charges are handled as criminal complaints. Also, the analysis found that most of the defamation provisions—which severely limit the ability of the press to function—are found in the penal codes, not the media laws. Therefore, any reform of media systems must address the penal codes.
In a country deeply polarized after three years of tumultuous change, Egyptian news websites have become very important media for free expression. This study looks at some of the pressures they are experiencing.
Study available in English and Arabic.
ILS presentation on principles of fake news regulationmrleiser
A short presentation for the ILS lunch series on how to regulate fake news, focusing on inter-agency cooperation while protecting free expression, ensuring financial and advertising transparency.
Its not easy being a journalist. Especially in my home country, Kenya. There are constant challenges around the profession, which highlights the effects of press freedom around the world.
Presentation by Bernd Holznagel at the 2019 CMPF Summer School for Journalists and Media Practitioners - Covering Political Campaigns in the Age of Data, Algorithms & Artificial Intelligence
Presentation by Anna Herold at the 2019 CMPF Summer School for Journalists and Media Practitioners - Covering Political Campaigns in the Age of Data, Algorithms & Artificial Intelligence
Presentation by Damian Tambini at the 2019 CMPF Summer School for Journalists and Media Practitioners - Covering Political Campaigns in the Age of Data, Algorithms & Artificial Intelligence
Freedom of the press is not the same as freedom of expressionMartin Hirst
This lecture discusses the concepts of freedom of expression, freedom of speech and freedom of the press. I argue they are not the same thing. I also talk about freedom of speech and freedom of the press under capitalism and conditions of class struggle. I am a Marxist, after all.
Overview of our GNI report, downloadable from http://globalnetworkinitiative.org/news/new-report-outlines-recommendations-governments-companies-and-others-how-protect-free
This paper identifies and analyzes the defamation provisions in the laws of six Arab countries and compares them to generally accepted approaches toward libel and slander. The authors identify three main characteristics related to defamation law that are generally adopted by countries with strong protections for press freedom. First, public figures must withstand greater scrutiny than private figures so that powerful officials cannot use defamation charges to stifle public debate. Second, truth must be an absolute defense against allegations of defamation so that people cannot protect a good reputation that they do not deserve. Third, defamation cases should be handled by civil lawsuits rather than police complaints so that journalists are not unduly swayed in their reporting by the specter of ending up in prison. The analysis examines the penal codes, media laws and cybercrime laws of these six countries: Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, and the United Arab Emirates. The results find that the defamation provisions in these countries were nearly identical and that all were out of alignment with generally accepted norms. Public officials receive more protection than private figures, truth is not an absolute defense and all defamation charges are handled as criminal complaints. Also, the analysis found that most of the defamation provisions—which severely limit the ability of the press to function—are found in the penal codes, not the media laws. Therefore, any reform of media systems must address the penal codes.
In a country deeply polarized after three years of tumultuous change, Egyptian news websites have become very important media for free expression. This study looks at some of the pressures they are experiencing.
Study available in English and Arabic.
ILS presentation on principles of fake news regulationmrleiser
A short presentation for the ILS lunch series on how to regulate fake news, focusing on inter-agency cooperation while protecting free expression, ensuring financial and advertising transparency.
The challenges that we are facing can be addressed only through stronger international cooperation. The Summit of the Future, to be held in 2024, is an opportunity to agree on multilateral solutions for a better tomorrow, strengthening global governance for both present and future generations (General Assembly resolution
76/307). In my capacity as Secretary-General, I have been invited to provide inputs to the preparations for the Summit in the form of action oriented recommendations, building on the proposals contained in my report entitled “Our Common Agenda” (A/75/982), which was itself a response to the declaration on the commemoration of the seventy-fifth anniversary of the United
Nations (General Assembly resolution 75/1). The present policy brief is one such input. It serves to elaborate on the ideas first proposed in Our Common Agenda, taking into account subsequent guidance from Member States and more than one year of intergovernmental and multi-stakeholder consultations, and rooted in the purposes and the principles of the Charter of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international instruments.
Presentation by Christian D'Cunha at the 2019 CMPF Summer School for Journalists and Media Practitioners - Covering Political Campaigns in the Age of Data, Algorithms & Artificial Intelligence
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
A principle-based approach to regulating #fakenews
1. Dr Mark Leiser FHEA FRSA
Assistant Professor
eLaw – Center for Law and DigitalTechnologies
Leiden University
Cambridge International LawConference
20 Mar 2019 18h00-19h00 Plenary Session
2. I. International Propaganda
II. Defining Fake News
III. Analyse the methods
IV.The role of human rights
V.Principle-based approach
VI.Future Concerns
3. 3
UK Security Services: 10M tweets from 700KTwitter accounts that linked to more than 600 misinformation & conspiracy news
outlets
4. State obligation not to disseminate propaganda
hostile to neighbours
Customary law since French Revolution
Consistently violated, leaving status in confusion
▪ Napoleon (1802): ‘general maxim of international law that states
bound to suppress private propaganda and punish those who purvey
it’
Technology (radio, telegram)
Message dissemination across borders in early 20th Century
▪ The ConventionConcerning the Use of Broadcasting in the Cause of
Peace
▪ Bi-LateralTreaties of Friendship and Non-Aggression
▪ Law of Neutrality 4
5. The Convention Concerning the Use of
Broadcasting in the Cause of Peace
Articles 1,3,5 charged states w/ control of broadcast
▪ Public and private
States sovereignty over the flow of all information
in/out territory
▪ Establishment of controls for licensing facilities
▪ Eliminating clandestine radio stations
▪ “Transmission and reception of information, public or private,
which might directly or indirectly promote the purposes of the
aggressor States, or of governments subservient to them” 5
6. Conflict between US/UK marketplace of ideas to correct
inaccuracies w/ USSR approach of direct control of media
Economic and Social Council sponsored International Conference on
Freedom of Information (Geneva, 1948)
▪ “Measures for counteracting the persistent spreading of demonstrably false or
tendentious reports which confuse the peoples of the world, aggravate
relations between nations, or otherwise interfere with the growth of
international understanding, peace, and security against a Nazi, Fascist, or
Japanese aggression”
Affirmed FoI as fundamental right, the right to listen
Only censorship ground was “military security”, not PS or NS 6
7. Draft Convention to the GeneralAssembly (1949)
The right to know and the right to freely seek the truth are inalienable
and fundamental rights of man. Everyone has the right, individually and
collectively to seek, receive and impart information
Article 2: “The right to seek and transmit information should be assured in
order to enable the public to ascertain facts and appraise events”
Article 19, ICCPR
Right to hold opinions w/o interference/FoI/ Qualifications
Article 26, ICCPR
Propaganda prohibited for war or advocacy of hatred, incitement to
discrimination, hostility or violence 7
8. Demanded an expanded definition
Propaganda should not be thought of as
purposefully misleading information whose
dissemination intended to harm a nation or
people
Can also result from technically accurate,
incomplete understanding
Right of correction is critical to thwart
propaganda
▪ Incorrect statements shall be rectified at the
earliest opportunity by the most effective means 8
9. Can we come up with a working definition?
Tambini: define ‘fake news’ by identifying the beneficiaries:
▪ New populists: undermine legitimate opposition, resist fourth estate accountability.
▪ Historical losers: Political actors claim that result only happened due to misinformation
▪ Some say those on the wrong end of an outcome say results are not legitimate.
▪ Legacy media: “mainstream media” want to discredit ‘wisdom of crowds’; aim for a return to
trusted news brands
D’Ancona: “the deliberate presentation of falsehood as fact”;
▪ Definition doesn’t actually include news
EC’s High Level Group on fake news and online disinformation: drops ‘fake news’ and
refers to ‘online manipulation’
▪ Micro-targeted, managed-content display presented as most relevant for individual; is determined
in order to maximise revenue for the platform; Leiser: definition excludes advertising
Leiser: “Deceptive form of authentic-looking media, publishing or advertising that seeks to
take advantage of our cognitive biases and errors in judgement to advance a commercial or
political agenda.Content creator does not submit to media regulation
12. Both interlinked…
Limited content in traditional press/media
▪ Everything from peer review in academia to editorial judgments in broadcast, press
Threat to quality/reliability of information in circulation
▪ Matters of public interest/infosphere
Acted to ensure some qualitative boundaries, especially on statements of fact
Media UK: self-regulation/co-regulation
Independent Press Standards Organization; IMPRESS: statutory regulation through Ofcom and Communications Act 2003
▪ System ensures “best-attempt” in ensuring accuracy; with requirements to correct “inaccuracy”
▪ Media Deal: Submit to legal frameworks for media duties and responsibility; gain highest protection under Article X
Platforms : self-regulatory
Business models designed to distribute stories after qualitative assessment about a news article based on
popularity (within certain groups)
▪ Not accuracy/based on fact or evidence or logical reasoning
Limited attention spans/overload prevent discriminating between messages at:
▪ Individual level
▪ System level (algorithmic recommendations, choice architecture)
13. Political Speech
Organic, holistic, individualized
▪ Users “sharing user generated content” via platforms like Facebook andTwitter
Commercial Speech
Dark Posts (psychometric profiling and targeted advertising)
#FakeNews sites powered by GoogleAdSense and paid-for
advertising
Political Advertising (paid for advertisements delivered to custom
audiences that link to a #fakenews website or a political nature)
Hybrid Speech:
Machine speech (bots, botnets, automation, machine-learning)
▪ Applies to commercial and political speech
13
14. Principle of subsidiarity
▪ “In areas which do not fall within its exclusive competence, the Union shall act only if and in so far as the objectives of the
proposed action cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, either at central level or at regional and local level, but
can rather, by reason of the scale or effects of the proposed action, be better achieved at Union level.”
Nothing new?
Old: First Statute ofWestminster (1275)
▪ “None be so hardy to tell or publish any false news or tales, whereby discord, or occasion oof discord or slander may grow between the King and
his people, or the great men of the Realm” –
New: Section 106, Representation of the PeoplesAct 1983:
Criminal offence to publish a false statement about character or conduct of an election candidate in order to
(negatively) affect how many votes that person will/might get
▪ Law is not specifically or solely aimed at the press/media, and usually involves a claim against opposition candidate
▪ Offence not to include an “imprint” (identification) on election material printed in a newspaper or periodical.
▪ Electoral Commission fined Mr LaurenceTaylor GBP 4,000 for failing to include proper identification details on newspaper advertisement he
placed during regulated period (15 April to 23 June) for EU referendum
Ofcom (UK’s Broadcast Regulator) and the Advertisement Standards Authority (ASA) cannot stop online advertising
during campaigns because do not have the power to control what happens online
Electoral Commission
15. Does fake news speech
Does fake news engageArticle 10(1) ECHR protection?
Who is responsible for regulating fake news?
Are platforms, providing means of transport for speech bits, without
exercising any editing function, simply exercising preferences exhibited by its
users?
Can speech regulation be compatible with citizen empowerment?
Should non-human or “automated transmissions” be treated as speech?
“Fact that algorithm is involved does not mean that a machine is doing the
talking”
▪ Bots as extension of the user/machine learning speech
15
16. Methods-based approach
Data Protection (psychometric/behavioural core, custom, targeted advertising)
Free Expression
▪ Regulation of Commercial Speech
▪ PoliticalAdvertising regulation requires financial transparency
▪ Domain Name Registration (Registrar and Registries including contractual terms and conditions)
▪ Regulation of Political Speech
▪ Complex and controversial, but not impossible
▪ Criminal Law: Defamation (where applicable) and Fraud
FinancialTransparency
▪ Psychometric & targeted advertising,GoogleAdSense)
Subsidiarity
Human Empowerment 16
17. 1st Amendment, US Constitution
Majoritarian beliefs in the marketplace of ideas
Article 10 ECHR –Qualified Right to free expression
Objective approach judges speech on contribution to
society & protects speech if and insofar it contributes to
finding the best ideas in the marketplace
Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
(ICCPR)
Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (CFR)
Article 20 ICCPR on propaganda for war & forms of hatred that
constitutes an incitement to discrimination, hostility, or violence
17
18. Article 10(1) “Everyone has the right to free expression”
“Freedom of expression constitutes essential foundation of a democratic society”
“Free elections and free expression, particularly freedom of political debate, together
form the bedrock of any democratic system”
▪ Lingens v Austria (app. No 9815/82); Stensaas v Norway (app. No 21980/93); Axel Springer v Germany
‘Expression Deal’: “Media given editorial responsibility for content ensuring
responsible, quality controls in exchange for significant freedom when reporting
matters of public concern”
Article 10(2) Contextual “duties and responsibilities”
MS permitted to legislate, subject to proportional “formalities, conditions, restrictions
or penalties are as prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society”
▪ “Particularly important in the period preceding an election that opinions and information of all kinds
are permitted to circulate freely” – Bowman v UK, Para. 40 .18
19. Article 10(1) protects the act of deceptive speech, while 10(2)
contextualizes regulation of speech actors
Facilitates just outcomes in face of competing general interests
Margin of Appreciation to regulate actors when “prescribed by law”
▪ Inflammatory racist or false terrorist threats
▪ Curtailment of private rights
▪ Harm to consumers through misleading advertising
▪ Risk of false conviction
Nb defamatory speech is not protected speech
19
20. Four Characteristics associated with speech
▪ Personhood
▪ “Humanness”
▪ Cognizance
▪ Expressiveness
US approach has shifted from humanness towards protecting rights of entities w/ personhood
Is machine speech output in scope of 1st Amendment?
Full arsenal of rules, principles, standards, distinctions, presumptions, tools, factors, tests becomes
available to determine whether particular speech will be protected
Protection flows alongside natural technological developments
Video games and search engine results protected under 1st Amendment
▪ ACLU v Reno 521 US 844 (1997); Zhang v Baidu.Com Inc 10 F. Supp 3d 433
Wu: “Like a book, canvas or pamphlet, the program is the medium the author uses to communicate his
ideas to the world…”
20
21. 21
Effective regulation and Free Expression not incompatible
Enhanced protection: Article 10 ECHR, Article 11 EU’s ChFR
Qualifications: Interference is necessary in a democratic society. ... pressing social need
must accord with the requirements of a democratic society.
Simple choices about content amplification can suppress minority
speech
Regulating machine speech (bots, botnets, scripts, automation)
Interagency cooperation including organizations responsible for the state’s cybersecurity
to develop frameworks for preventing, disrupting and investigation of the propagation
of computational propaganda and disinformation
Regulating political advertising during sensitive periods
Social media analysis and network mapping to model the creator’s intention, the
potential responsibility for the intentional (or reckless) facilitation of deception by the
propagator
“To place certain
restrictions, of a type which
would not usually be
acceptable, on freedom of
expression” in order to
secure the “free expression
of the opinion of the people
in the choice of the
legislature” –
Bowman v the United
Kingdom App no 24839/94
(ECtHR, 19 February 1998)
22. Article 10 impose positive duty on states:
“To ensure, firstly, that the public has access through television and radio to impartial
and accurate information and a range of opinion and comment, reflecting inter alia the
diversity of political outlook within the country, and secondly, that journalists and
other professionals working in the audio-visual media are not prevented from
imparting this information and comment” - Manole v Maldova, Decision of 13 July 2010
at Para 100.
Appropriate regulatory framework to ensure journalists’ freedom of expression on the
Internet.
Margin of Appreciation
▪ Legitimizes general media duties to relay accurate information
Obligation restricted to broadcast media, but consider structural decline of traditional,
legacy media, this principle could be applied to platforms 22
23. 23
Demonetization of #fakenews websites
‘Follow the money’ approach to disrupting economic incentives
▪ Technical measures that preventGoogle Ads visibility on #fakenews websites
Note: Platforms already decide what content is permitted
▪ Google/FB policies state they will restrict ad serving on websites that misrepresent content or use “deceptive and misleading
content”.
Transparency for Advertising
Public repositories for political advertisements
▪ Metadata with a full documentary account of the ad, who purchased it, the associated landing page,
targeting campaign, etc.
▪ All metadata associated with a political advertisement should be downloadable in machine readable
language, stimulating economic growth by creating markets for competing campaign
Prescribed Periods
▪ Licensing regime implemented by Election Regulator in conjunction w/ the security services, inter-agency
cooperation
▪ Electoral regulators to mandate platforms like Google Adsense hold all advertising revenue during any
sensitive periods to allow content to be reviewed and critiqued by stakeholders, with advertising revenue
withheld for violating Codes of Conduct
With a combined market share of
63.1% of the US digital ad
market, Facebook’s Audience
Network and Google’s AdSense
play a major role in deciding
what content will or will not be
monetized
24. Speech protection, share restriction
Freedom of speech, not freedom to share
▪ WhatsApp sharing restrictions
▪ HashingTechnology, Article flagging, Choice Architecture
▪ Default newsfeeds
Right to Data Portability (Article 20)
Regulator advance 3rd party analysis of media usage
Inform users of corrections via data analysis
Empowering users w/ info about content
24
25. 25
Problem with terminology?
Do social media platforms matter anymore?
Should we move away from using the term, #FakeNews, and go back to deceptive content?
26. 26
?
?
?
??
?
?
? ?
Thank you for your attention!
Or contact me later: m.r.leiser@law.leidenuniv.nl
Twitter: @mleiser
Editor's Notes
UN Charter does not mention propaganda but implied under Article 39. “peace-threatening situations”. Nations asked the UN to address propaganda diretly. International Conference on the Freedom of information at Geneva in 1948.
Ironic –Artile 26 negotiations specifically called for governmental regulation of any information advocating discrimination or qualifying as propaganda.
Jowett and O'Donnell: Twitter essentially combines the oral tradition of spreading propaganda with new electronic means of dissemination; New populists: Historical losers: Legacy media: Interestingly, mainstream media are the ones screaming from the hilltops that intermediaries (mainly Facebook and Google) are media, and with none of the obligations that traditional media have taken on, they are acting irresponsible by allowing fake news to spread so easily across their platforms. Accordingly, they should be regulated as such, and recoup lost ad revenue.
In matters of public interest, fake news is a threat to the public interest and the infosphere; traditional Media forced to operate under the ‘’expression paradox”.