SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review
Shelley  Pecha 	 Scott Short Mary Jo Pittman Ron  Verdon Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review Chair, Curriculum Committee Current Program Director Program Director’s Office Former Program Director
Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review email to students
Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review Student Self-Assessment Questionnaire
Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review courses completed questionnaire
Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review artist & designer statement
Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review matting instructions
Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review MPR evaluation sheets used by faculty
Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
 
Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review MPR assessment chart
Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review MPR assessment chart
 
Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review student assessment of MPR process
Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review summary of  student outcomes assessment  in the major  report
Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review summary of student outcomes assessment in the major report
Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review summary of student outcomes assessment in the major report
Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review summary of student outcomes assessment in the major report
Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review MPR score summary of evaluation sheets assessment in the major report
Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review MPR score summary of evaluation sheets assessment in the major report
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Other Comments: I am thankful for the teachers taking time to do this for us. Great to hear unbiased professional feedback from different areas Notify students freshman year about mid program. Impress upon them the importance of preserving their work. I think at the end of each review the professors should sum up what needs to be worked on and what was good. Just for clarification Over all good experience I think that mid-program review would have been more beneficial for me if at least one person from my content area had been present and if the reviewers had given me more feedback about my artwork. The advisors really opened my eyes to things I have been avoiding and unable to see on my own It’s not as bad as I’ve heard it to be. 

More Related Content

Similar to Mid Program Review

Estings evaluation
Estings evaluationEstings evaluation
Estings evaluation
smashingentertainment
 
7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation
BenjaminPartner
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
louis harman
 
Effective communication skills, both verbal and written, are essen.docx
Effective communication skills, both verbal and written, are essen.docxEffective communication skills, both verbal and written, are essen.docx
Effective communication skills, both verbal and written, are essen.docx
toltonkendal
 
Ha3 evaluation.doc
Ha3 evaluation.docHa3 evaluation.doc
Ha3 evaluation.doc
Stuart_Preston
 
Factual Page Layout Evaluation
Factual Page Layout EvaluationFactual Page Layout Evaluation
Factual Page Layout Evaluation
katietorpey1
 
Factual Page Layout Evaluation Task 10
Factual Page Layout Evaluation Task 10Factual Page Layout Evaluation Task 10
Factual Page Layout Evaluation Task 10
katietorpey1
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
Herbie nelson
 
Print Project - 7. Evaluation
Print Project - 7. EvaluationPrint Project - 7. Evaluation
Print Project - 7. Evaluation
Tigs0102
 
Hip hop shakespeare evaluation yo
Hip hop shakespeare evaluation yoHip hop shakespeare evaluation yo
Hip hop shakespeare evaluation yo
smashingentertainment
 
6. evaluation mv 2018 3
6. evaluation mv 2018 36. evaluation mv 2018 3
6. evaluation mv 2018 3
amy foster
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
AJ
 
7. evaluation(1)
7. evaluation(1)7. evaluation(1)
7. evaluation(1)
brooklynwhiteley1
 
7. evaluation (fmp)
7. evaluation (fmp)7. evaluation (fmp)
7. evaluation (fmp)
kyranDurkin
 
Anne Cunningham Sunderland event April 10
Anne Cunningham Sunderland event April 10Anne Cunningham Sunderland event April 10
Anne Cunningham Sunderland event April 10
MEL SIG - Media Enhanced learning, Special Interest Group
 
Sunderland event - Dr Anne Cunningham
Sunderland event - Dr Anne CunninghamSunderland event - Dr Anne Cunningham
Sunderland event - Dr Anne Cunningham
MEL SIG
 
So B Teaching Better Seminar
So B Teaching Better SeminarSo B Teaching Better Seminar
So B Teaching Better Seminar
University of Otago
 
Client evaluation
 Client evaluation  Client evaluation
Client evaluation
Tom Batty
 
L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template (1)
L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template (1)L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template (1)
L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template (1)
JayBrown42459
 
Creative media y1 unit 3 review
Creative media y1 unit 3 reviewCreative media y1 unit 3 review
Creative media y1 unit 3 review
ClaudiaRose5
 

Similar to Mid Program Review (20)

Estings evaluation
Estings evaluationEstings evaluation
Estings evaluation
 
7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
Effective communication skills, both verbal and written, are essen.docx
Effective communication skills, both verbal and written, are essen.docxEffective communication skills, both verbal and written, are essen.docx
Effective communication skills, both verbal and written, are essen.docx
 
Ha3 evaluation.doc
Ha3 evaluation.docHa3 evaluation.doc
Ha3 evaluation.doc
 
Factual Page Layout Evaluation
Factual Page Layout EvaluationFactual Page Layout Evaluation
Factual Page Layout Evaluation
 
Factual Page Layout Evaluation Task 10
Factual Page Layout Evaluation Task 10Factual Page Layout Evaluation Task 10
Factual Page Layout Evaluation Task 10
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
 
Print Project - 7. Evaluation
Print Project - 7. EvaluationPrint Project - 7. Evaluation
Print Project - 7. Evaluation
 
Hip hop shakespeare evaluation yo
Hip hop shakespeare evaluation yoHip hop shakespeare evaluation yo
Hip hop shakespeare evaluation yo
 
6. evaluation mv 2018 3
6. evaluation mv 2018 36. evaluation mv 2018 3
6. evaluation mv 2018 3
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
 
7. evaluation(1)
7. evaluation(1)7. evaluation(1)
7. evaluation(1)
 
7. evaluation (fmp)
7. evaluation (fmp)7. evaluation (fmp)
7. evaluation (fmp)
 
Anne Cunningham Sunderland event April 10
Anne Cunningham Sunderland event April 10Anne Cunningham Sunderland event April 10
Anne Cunningham Sunderland event April 10
 
Sunderland event - Dr Anne Cunningham
Sunderland event - Dr Anne CunninghamSunderland event - Dr Anne Cunningham
Sunderland event - Dr Anne Cunningham
 
So B Teaching Better Seminar
So B Teaching Better SeminarSo B Teaching Better Seminar
So B Teaching Better Seminar
 
Client evaluation
 Client evaluation  Client evaluation
Client evaluation
 
L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template (1)
L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template (1)L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template (1)
L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template (1)
 
Creative media y1 unit 3 review
Creative media y1 unit 3 reviewCreative media y1 unit 3 review
Creative media y1 unit 3 review
 

Mid Program Review

  • 1. Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review
  • 2. Shelley Pecha Scott Short Mary Jo Pittman Ron Verdon Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review Chair, Curriculum Committee Current Program Director Program Director’s Office Former Program Director
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6. Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review email to students
  • 7. Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review Student Self-Assessment Questionnaire
  • 8. Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review courses completed questionnaire
  • 9. Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review artist & designer statement
  • 10. Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review matting instructions
  • 11. Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review MPR evaluation sheets used by faculty
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16.  
  • 17. Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review MPR assessment chart
  • 18. Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review MPR assessment chart
  • 19.  
  • 20. Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review student assessment of MPR process
  • 21. Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review summary of student outcomes assessment in the major report
  • 22. Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review summary of student outcomes assessment in the major report
  • 23. Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review summary of student outcomes assessment in the major report
  • 24. Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review summary of student outcomes assessment in the major report
  • 25. Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review MPR score summary of evaluation sheets assessment in the major report
  • 26. Department of Art & Design Mid-Program Review MPR score summary of evaluation sheets assessment in the major report
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32. Other Comments: I am thankful for the teachers taking time to do this for us. Great to hear unbiased professional feedback from different areas Notify students freshman year about mid program. Impress upon them the importance of preserving their work. I think at the end of each review the professors should sum up what needs to be worked on and what was good. Just for clarification Over all good experience I think that mid-program review would have been more beneficial for me if at least one person from my content area had been present and if the reviewers had given me more feedback about my artwork. The advisors really opened my eyes to things I have been avoiding and unable to see on my own It’s not as bad as I’ve heard it to be. 